Slashdot Mirror


DARPA-Funded Robots Learning To Cook By Watching YouTube Videos

jfruh writes Once you've built humanoid-shaped robots, how do you get them to move and act like humans? Well, one way to teach them how to do it is to have them watch one of the greatest repository of recorded human experience ever: YouTube. Robots in a Maryland lab have learned how to prepare meals by watching and processing a slew of cooking videos, one of YouTube's most popular genres.

50 of 88 comments (clear)

  1. cOOKING? rEALLY? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Funny

    These types of robots will never replace humans in the fast food industry because high school drop-outs and liberal arts masters grads will always be cheaper. Might make a nice bartender on the long trip to Mars.

    Yes, yes, I know. "Machine Learning" ...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:cOOKING? rEALLY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      They have said this about computers and every new technology that has come along. The truth is, eventually it does replace us in the workforce. Now we have to figure out how we are going to value our contribution to society.

    2. Re: cOOKING? rEALLY? by smaddox · · Score: 1

      Last I read, they are targeting a price point of $20k for those robots. Considering they could probably replace 2 workers each, the payback time would be less than a year.

    3. Re:cOOKING? rEALLY? by gman003 · · Score: 1

      You're right - different robots have already replaced humans for much of the fast-food process. All the humans do is slap the meat into a cooker for a precise amount of time, then piles all the ingredients in the right order. The meat, the sauce, the buns, were all made by machines.

      Besides, this robot wouldn't be cooking fast-food. This would replace the actual chefs at actual restaurants, at least the low-end ones at first. Think "Applebees", not "McDonalds".

    4. Re: cOOKING? rEALLY? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Last I read, they are targeting a price point of $20k for those robots. Considering they could probably replace 2 workers each, the payback time would be less than a year.

      How many people would buy the "Kate" model just so they can say "Kate, make me a sammich"?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re: cOOKING? rEALLY? by MisterSquid · · Score: 2

      How many people would buy the "Kate" model just so they can say "Kate, make me a sammich"?

      Unless you're logged in as root, you have to use sudo

      --
      blog
    6. Re:cOOKING? rEALLY? by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      These types of robots will never replace humans in the fast food industry because high school drop-outs and liberal arts masters grads will always be cheaper.

      Humans have a minimum acceptable wage in that they require food to continue operation. If the cost of robots were to drop below the amount humans need for minimal survival then humans would be unable to compete since it would be impossible to drop their wage demands to match.

  2. Meet the Meat... by chrysosphinx · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is the worst of what could be invented in robotics. If such robot can cut the meat with a kitchen knife, what happens to humanity when it learns from head cutting terrorist videos?

    1. Re:Meet the Meat... by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Funny

      We get in our mech suits and seek and destroy. That is of course after several years calling it work place violance rather than robot terrorism.

    2. Re:Meet the Meat... by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      This is the worst of what could be invented in robotics.

      You think that's bad? Wait until they start watching old twilight zone episodes and start writing books with titles like "To serve man".

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:Meet the Meat... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      Easy way to neutralize them - just have them watch online pr0n for a while.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re: Meet the Meat... by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      Thats why you ser the parental controls to only allow Paula Dean videos.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    5. Re:Meet the Meat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Easy way to neutralize them - just have them watch online pr0n for a while.

      I'm sure that someone in the adult entertainment industry will soon be working on ways to extend this technology out into new ways for these robots to meet various other needs of their human owners. Just sayin'.

    6. Re:Meet the Meat... by amalcolm · · Score: 1

      Until the damn thnig segfaults in the middle of fellatio !

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    7. Re:Meet the Meat... by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      *segfaulted robot sits motionless while tester writhes in agony*

      ENGINEER: "Ah. Now I see. The jaws' default state should be /open/ on loss of power or critical error. Hey Frank? Make a note for version 1.1, will ya?"

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  3. That's cool and all but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... can they learn to reproduce by watching free porno?

    1. Re:That's cool and all but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://imgdonkey.com/big/MDVRVWlLcQ/robot-humping-a-washing-machine.gif

    2. Re:That's cool and all but... by Quasimodem · · Score: 1

      Unless someone uploads a usable robot repair and upgrading video to YouTube, they will have to keep a few humans around for maintenance.

  4. *sigh* by eagee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If climate change and the next ice age we're inevitably bringing down on ourselves doesn't destroy human civilization, robots that learn how to behave by watching YouTube certainly will.

    1. Re:*sigh* by gman003 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Let's hope they didn't program it to read the comments.

    2. Re:*sigh* by dissy · · Score: 1

      And I for one welcome our new robotic cooking mama letsplayer overlords, and would like to remind them I have experience providing data center uptimes of fine nines while they are rounding up humans to toil away in their underground minecraft mines.

  5. Re:really? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    Who says they are not learning all sorts of things? Cooking is all they are telling us about. And by they, it could be DARPA or the robots themselves. Maybe they are waiting for just the right time.

  6. Big Deal? by rotorbudd · · Score: 1

    I think that's how my wife learned

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it, but artillery is addressed to " Whom It May concern"
    1. Re:Big Deal? by TWX · · Score: 2

      Episodes of My Drunk Kitchen don't count...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  7. DARPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    First of all, thanks for a lot of cool things, the internet being possibly the greatest.

    Now, since they are a "Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency", where is OARPA? You know, the Offense Advanced Research Projects Agency?

    Somehow, I think there's not one -- and it's not hidden for secrecy reasons. I'm not pointing out that because I'm against them. I even recognize to deal with certain folks which have been asking for lead for some time now.

    But I think, since we don't like Russian being hypocrites (or the Chinese, though less so), it would be nice if the western world would be more transparent...

    And BTW, if robots are watching the internet, we might as well start writing our wills...

  8. Re:really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From TFA (which also uses the word "cooking" -the original article on the university website, quoted by TFA, does not, however), they "only" had the robot "recognize" tools used with 79% accuracy, grasps with 91% accuracy, and movements, with 83% accuracy for the description of the movement using words (which is more about digitizing the movement itself... I suppose the naming is "just" a static algorithm "recognizing" movement parts... although they say this is a significant part of this research, the fact the robot does not "simply" try to imitate the movement exactly, but "recognizes" it, and moves as he "thinks" is best to do the same thing). They don't mention anything else, so I suppose this is just that. Tool and movement "recognition", and task reproduction. No mention of the precision of the movement (although once recognized, for known movements and ingredients at least, I suppose the movement could be very precise), no mention about ingredients, no mention about actual cooking, no mention about video sample selection (they do talk about "varied quality and consistency", but that does not mean "a large quantity of random cooking videos with comparable results" of course...), etc.

    Aside from that, I think cooking sure could be an "easy" target, considering the more general goal, but there is of course absolutely zero point in itself, in having robots learn cooking by watching videos... Adaptation is of course very important (many things sure can happen in a kitchen, starting with the cooking environment and the ingredients, and any number of possible events which may have problematic and negative physical security and health consequences), but cooking is mostly a very technical task, and having pre-programmed specific verified and perfected recipes would be far more beneficial.

  9. Next week the robots will watch Terminator by luckytroll · · Score: 1

    We really should be careful of what video our young impressionable robots are watching.

    Only a matter of time before a nature/firmware versus nurture/experience debate becomes a thing for machines too.

  10. What is our robot doing? by drolli · · Score: 1

    Yea i mistyped "cock" instead of "cook" in the search field from which videos he should learn....

  11. It's a Cookbook! by Hairy1 · · Score: 1

    It's a Cookbook!

  12. what about viewing some braking bad by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    what about viewing some braking bad?

  13. What if it watches HowToBasic? by SophiaKadaj · · Score: 2

    Title.

  14. Please don't let them watch Criminal Minds by NothingWasAvailable · · Score: 1

    Just sayin.

  15. Coolest thing ever by techyperson1 · · Score: 1

    This is soo amazing and cool!!!

  16. Eat at home by ehiris · · Score: 1

    That's a concept which might end up being a reality. Can't wait for a robot cook.

  17. Re:really? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    So everything is going to taste like chicken?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  18. What could possibly go wrong? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1
    Great. Just great. Now we're teaching robots to watch TV. As if the Neilsen ratings weren't skewed enough already, NOW we'll have robots watching TV all the time to learn various things.

    So what happens when they start watching porn?

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      So what happens when they start watching porn?

      We'll finally get our jobs back.

  19. Re:really? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

    So everything is going to taste like chicken?

    Yeah, except the chicken...

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  20. Can't wait... by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

    Can't wait to see what yummy meals these robots will prepare after watching 'Will it blend' on youtube!

    --
    If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
  21. Oh oh, too many examples. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    They cook cats.

  22. Remember Muppet Show? by Jade_Wayfarer · · Score: 1

    I, for one, would love to watch these robots perform after watching some Swedish Chef videos.

    --
    Absence of proof != proof of absence.
  23. Re:well under the gop healthcare plan you may want by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

    well under the gop healthcare plan you may want to be in prison if you need anything high cost and you have an preexisting condition

    Except these days, most prisons are privately owned and run under government contracts. Their track records speak volumes. They're not gonna spend a dime they think they don't have to to stay profitable. See this, this, and just for the hell of it, this. Further examples can be googled of course.

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  24. Re:really? by gnupun · · Score: 1

    This seems like way too big of a leap... If they could do that they could learn all sort of things besides cooking.

    Yep, if they can cook by watching cooking videos, they can also learn about being waiters, auto mechanics and a host of other fixed skill jobs. But let's not put fear into the common masses that their jobs may be obsolete in 10-20 years.

  25. Re:really? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    So, half the time they'll be trying to cut you dog in half with a spoon, but part of the reason it's not cutting in half is because they're prodding instead of sawing and the ingredient keeps moving.

    Or 83% * 79% * 91% = 59% success rate for tool, grasp and movement types combined, of course this is just one part of cooking a meal. They really should have a video.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  26. Why cooking? by sabbede · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be easier to use YouTube videos to train robot cats?

  27. Good point on cost reductions in prison healthcare by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    I guess the initial "dystopia" I painted in this video parable where everyone ends up in prison just to get food to survive after robots take all the jobs is even worse than anticipated:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
    "The Richest Man in the World: A parable about robotics, abundance, technological change, unemployment, happiness, and a basic income."

    And of course, once you have AIs running the prisons and robot guards, who knows what they will do?

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  28. Re:really? by GTRacer · · Score: 1
    ObMatrix:

    "How do the machines know what Tastee Wheat tasted like? Maybe they got it wrong. Maybe what I think Tastee Wheat tasted like actually tasted like oatmeal, or tuna fish. That makes you wonder about a lot of things. You take chicken, for example: maybe they couldn't figure out what to make chicken taste like, which is why chicken tastes like everything!"

    --
    Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  29. Re:How is this news?!? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Bad humans cooks with bad recipes and low budgets?

    Robots really have been preparing food for decades. Almost all food that ends up shrink-wrapped was made by machines. However they were made by specialized machines built for the task required instead of building something that could work in a human kitchen.

  30. sure, robots can cook by cschepers · · Score: 1

    but they have no sense of taste, so they use way too much salt.

  31. When the singularity hits by bobvious · · Score: 1

    "How to Serve Humans" will take on a whole new meaning.