Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

MPAA Considers Major Changes After Sony Hack

Posted by samzenpus on from the changing-things-up dept.

Earthquake Retrofit shares this story about changes that may be coming to the MPAA prompted by the Sony hack. "Fissures revealed by the hacking at Sony Pictures Entertainment have raised the prospect of profound change at one of Hollywood's oldest institutions: the Motion Picture Association of America. In a behind-the-scenes drama, the Sony Pictures chairman, Michael Lynton, last month told industry colleagues of a plan to withdraw from the movie trade organization, according to people who have been briefed on the discussions. He cited the organization’s slow response and lack of public support in the aftermath of the attack on Sony and its film The Interview, as well as longstanding concerns about the cost and efficacy of the group. Reversing course in mid-January, as the Oscar nominations were being announced, Mr. Lynton stayed in. But he and other studio executives are now discussing proposals that could alter the structure, mandate and governance of a 93-year-old organization that has been the policy front for Hollywood’s major film studios."

15 of 65 comments (clear)

  1. Disbanding? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Disbanding is the only postive change the MPAA could make, IMHO.

    1. Re:Disbanding? by disposable60 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Now if we could just get the RIAA to fall over, we'd be rid of the
      M usic
      A nd
      F ilm
      I ndustry
      A ssociations of
      A merica

      That _should_ be a good thing, but I fear a competition to become the most draconian in copyright enforcement.

      --
      You're looking for quotes? See my journal.
    2. Re:Disbanding? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If the MPAA disbands because of North Korea's actions, that could clean up North Korea's and the Kim dynasty's image overnight! We'd praise the Glorious Leader as a great hero of the people!

      (I'm joking...they do run death camps which are at least as bad as the MPAA)

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:Disbanding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You do realize that MPAA promotes a fascist system, not a capitalist one, don't you?

  2. Those are substantial annual fees by operator_error · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have you folks read TFA and seen the annuals fees due the MPAA by it's members? I am stunned. What value does the MPAA possibly offer that could come anywhere close to commanding such regal sums annually?

    1. Re:Those are substantial annual fees by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What value does the MPAA possibly offer that could come anywhere close to commanding such regal sums annually?

      Lobbying. And the MPAA has done a tremendous job, which is why all of Disney's characters are still under copyright half a century after Disney died, and nearly a century after they were first created. $20 million from each of the 6 big studios is a pittance in return. FTA:

      Under tightened government ethics rules, the building’s screening room [MPAA's in Washington DC], though still active, is no longer the scene of lavish movie-and-dinner nights that were once popular with lawmakers.

      So they had a "lavish" theater where they would wine and dine lawmakers, and most certainly let lawmakers rub elbows with A-list celebrities, over the decades before more stringent rules were put in place. You bet that influenced laws that keep extending copyright in favor of the MPAAs constituents.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    2. Re:Those are substantial annual fees by Zalbik · · Score: 3, Informative

      What value does the MPAA possibly offer that could come anywhere close to commanding such regal sums annually?

      Hey, congressmen are expensive!

  3. I doubt they are looking to go kinder and gentler by Crashmarik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the sound of it Sony wants a Meaner and leaner attack dog that does more damage and costs less.

  4. Re:I doubt they are looking to go kinder and gentl by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was, of course, talking from my own point of view. I am not talking better DRM, I am talking about getting rid of some corporate idiocy. We are all drowning in it.

  5. Change in Leadership by Guy+From+V · · Score: 4, Funny

    Insiders are reporting a shift in the hierarchy are being proposed such as allowing Satan to step down as CEO and having a board of directors take his place with possible suggested applicants being Lucifer, called the Lord of Light by some for his personality and ability mediate conflicts effectively, Babylon The Great Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth...a possibly good PR move to appeal to women in the field and a relative newcomer named Nyarlathotep who is unknown in many circles and seen as charismatic Middle-Eastern troubleshooter that "gets things done with everybody happy".

  6. Re:I doubt they are looking to go kinder and gentl by Crashmarik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well I agree about too much corporate and idiocy in general. I just wouldn't hold my breath on this guy. Just how did he expect the MPAA to come to his aid when his company was too stupid to properly secure it's network ? Strikes me as someone who is adept at blaming others for their mistakes.

  7. "We can harass our OWN customers," said Sony by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We already have enough DRM, region coding, forced commercials on our blu-rays and DVD's, etc. to annoy our OWN customers. Why do we need the MPAA harassing them too, when we do it so well already?

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  8. Re:Wow - Sony are imploding by jonwil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I was Sony I would be splitting the company into 3 pieces, one for the movie and music operations, one for the consumer electronics division (Bravia TVs, CyberShot & Alpha cameras etc etc) and one for the PlayStation division and their video games empire.

    A 3-way split means the consumer electronics division will no longer be restricted by the need to not do anything that would piss off the guys over in the content creation division. Also people who hate Sony and refuse to buy their products due to the crap their content creation division does (come on, they made & sold a whole pile of audio CDs that installed malware on basically any Windows PC you put the disk into) would be able to buy from the (presumably no longer super-evil) stand-alone consumer electronics company knowing they aren't supporting the super-evil content creation part of the company.

  9. Re:Wow - Sony are imploding by SIGBUS · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I always thought that Sony's acquisition of Columbia Pictures and CBS Records were long-term colossal mistakes.

    Old Sony: made cool stuff, fought tooth and nail for consumer rights (example: the Betamax case that went to the Supreme Court).
    New Sony: all about DRM and lock-in, fights tooth and nail against consumer rights.

    I liked the old Sony better.

    --
    Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
  10. They will have my support by Revek · · Score: 3, Informative

    When they give back what was stolen from me.