Slashdot Mirror
Researcher Developing Tattoo Removal Cream
BarbaraHudson writes During tattooing, ink is injected into the skin, initiating an immune response, and cells called "macrophages" move into the area and "eat up" the ink. The macrophages carry some of the ink to the body's lymph nodes, but some that are filled with ink stay put, embedded in the skin. That's what makes the tattoo visible under the skin. Dalhousie Uiversity's Alec Falkenham is developing a topical cream that works by targeting the macrophages that have remained at the site of the tattoo. New macrophages move in to consume the previously pigment-filled macrophages and then migrate to the lymph nodes, eventually taking all the dye with them. "When comparing it to laser-based tattoo removal, in which you see the burns, the scarring, the blisters, in this case, we've designed a drug that doesn't really have much off-target effect," he said. "We're not targeting any of the normal skin cells, so you won't see a lot of inflammation. In fact, based on the process that we're actually using, we don't think there will be any inflammation at all and it would actually be anti-inflammatory."
A lot of things are much easier for individuals to judge in hindsight than at the time they make those decisions.
Everything from teenage angst to pornography would be entirely different if more people foresaw the personal ramifications of their decisions.
Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
Got a tattoo in college. I really liked it for about 10 years, then I decided I was done with it and wanted to move on to another phase of my life. So I did laser removal, and I would say it's 99% gone. You'd have to be pretty close and know where to look to find any trace of it. In short, I rubbed a thousand dollars on it and it came right off!
No ragrets
-Dave
Why would you want something that is not permanent?
I know a porn star who has some prominent tattoos that are not permanent (possibly Henna that she has re-inked). They are her trademark, but also an exit strategy from the porn biz. Retire, take a vacation to let the ink fade. Then she can go out in public as the woman who looks like that porn star, but without the tats.
Have gnu, will travel.
Trees pump out all sorts of carcinogenic crap. The Great Smokey Mountains aren't smokey from man-made pollution or fire, after all. If the canopy isn't too heavy, living outdoors means susceptibility to skin cancer. Natural food, especially plants also contains all sorts of toxins. And water in nature can contain lead and arsenic and kill you too. But if you live like that, your chance of cancer might be cut down by getting bitten by a snake or attacked by a wolf or a bear or something, or just hypothermia.
This could help out a lot of misguided kids who went and uglified themselves, can't figure out why they keep getting rejected for jobs, can't wear a nice dress without looking like an octopus puked on them, or otherwise have defecated all over their skin.
Some ex-prisoners, too. Nothing like prison tats to mark you as an outcast, with all the social and financial downsides that involves (besides the complete drop to permanently lowest-class unemployable for most, I mean.)
Most tats -- not all, a very few are actually amazing bits of art -- aren't worth getting, and even fewer are worth keeping, confirmation bias and pure stubbornness notwithstanding.
This stuff works, though, and it'll change the entire nature of the industry. The idea that these aren't permanent will change the motivation and the sense of commitment, which could cut down on some of the outright stupidity. And for those who go forward, they'd no longer be outright screwing themselves when the styles change, or they run into one of the (many) bosses who view them as a mark of abject stupidity. Even that outlook might change, based on the knowledge that they aren't permanent -- I could see some saying, "You can work the returns counter as soon as you get 'John luvz Mary' off your forehead."
I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
I don't think so. When I was a college student it never occurred to me that I would want to remove the tattoo. It perfectly suited me, and I didn't understand that I would change over time and outgrow the tattoo. This is how kids think. They think that the way things are will remain forever. Forever young!
Some advice for people considering this path -- only get a black ink tattoo. They are much easier to remove than a colored tattoo. The laser has to be tuned to the wavelength of the ink color, so if you have a tattoo that is black, red and green then you need to hit it with three separate lasers and the way one color responds may be different than other colors.
Also, set your expectations. By the time my treatments were complete (6 treatments, each 6 weeks apart), the tattoo was about 2/3 faded. then my body flushed the rest out over the following year. So I can't complain!
I'm a math/science guy, and I have math symbols on my arms. If I ever regret my affection towards math and science, I might as well have some skin torn off.
Besides, the capital Sigma works great whenever somebody asks me "Are you series?".
Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
If the macrophages do this with tattoo ink, they no doubt do it with other things, as well.
I wonder if using this cream to remove ALL the dead-macrophages-loaded-with-junk from the skin will result in effectively "younger" skin?
If your hypothesis is proven accurate, the new product will remove ink and years off your appearance.
Cha-ching!
The only pharmaceutical product imaginably more profitable would be a weight loss cream that makes your dick hard.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.
Ernest Hemingway
I had a friend who was in the Marines when he was in this late teen years in the early 1950's. In the mid 80's he showed it to me. I was just a round blotch of blue/gray.
Tattoo ink migrates over time. Muscle and skin age and change their shape. It's guaranteed that a tattoo will not stay the same as time passes. It will only look worse.
By the way, the reason that sailors and marines get tattoos is in case they are blown to pieces. A distinctive tattoo on a limb makes it more likely that that body part will be recognized by the survivors. That's why there are often tats on different limbs.
Whens someone gets a tat, and then says that it's to mark a point in their life, I often wonder if that means they are planning for future senility, or being blown apart. Just wondering...
Why is Snark Required?