Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Most Useful Browser Extensions?

An anonymous reader writes: One of the most powerful features of modern browsers is the ability to install third-party extensions. They allow third-party developers to work on really useful niche functionality, and let users customize their browser with the tools they need. Unfortunately, this environment has the same discover-ability and security problems as standalone software. Thus, my question: what are your most useful (and safe) browser extensions? I can't live without some privacy basics like NoScript, AdBlock, and Ghostery. I also find FoxyProxy helpful for getting around geolocation requirements for media streaming. OneTab works pretty well for saving groups of browser tabs, and Pushbullet keeps getting better at managing my phone while I'm at my PC.

187 of 353 comments (clear)

  1. Browser Makers Should Get The Message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A lot of these addons have millions of downloads. Perhaps browser makers need to get the message and include popular functionality that people want.

    1. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by master_kaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well think aboout it, why would Google want to have adblock enabled by default, when most of there revenue comes from ads.
      Similar with mozilla where a lot of there revenue comes from google (or I guess yahoo now)
      Microsoft with bing.

    2. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by Krojack · · Score: 2

      Browser: Google Chrome
      Extension: Tabs to the front!
      What it does: Brings newly created tabs to the foreground.

      When opening a link in a new tab on my phone and having to take the extra time to then change to it enrages me. Why would anyone long press a link and choose "Open in new tab" and not want to view that tab right away? Why does Chrome toss it in the back?

    3. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I almost always want the new tab to open in the back. I'm usually opening shit that I want to read after I finish whatever I'm currently reading.

    4. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by Tower · · Score: 2

      Having a setting for that would be nice, but I much prefer my new tabs to pop to the back. I will usually scan through a page and open the set of links I want to read, then read them after the page I'm on, or switch and dive into one, but a lot of times it is just to build the queue. On my phone, I open them just so I can read them on a real screen later, since I can see my tabs and history from all devices.

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    5. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by lectos · · Score: 1

      Porn

    6. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by JMJimmy · · Score: 5, Informative

      As well, why not have a neutral platform you can build on to your needs instead of introducing bloat that only some people will like/use.

      Firefox:
        - AdBlock Plus + Element Hiding Helper
        - Chatzilla (IRC Chat)
        - FireFTP
        - SnapLinks Plus (right click multi-link select/copy/open)
        - Firebug
        - HTTPS Everywhere
        - Quickdrag (drag drop links into white space to open in new tab, drag drop images to download them)
        - SQLite Manager (manually browse and fix Mozilla's privacy blunders)
        - TableTools2 (manage table data when site options don't offer it)
        - YouTube HD (forces specific sizes when possible)
        - Live HTTP Headers (see what's really being sent)

    7. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by Dorianny · · Score: 3, Informative

      Add:

      FlashControl (To disable automatic running of applets is a must with the constant 0-day exploits and the widespread use of tracking applets.)

      Vanilla Cookie Manager (automatic clean up after gorging on cookies.)

    8. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by gsslay · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having them as addons is the browser makers getting the message. Some people want what an addon does, some people don't. Providing capability for addons to deliver functionality is giving people exactly what they want, and not burdening them with stuff they don't want.

      Or would you rather have your browsers provided as bloatware full of functionality you don't want and can't get rid of?

    9. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by codeButcher · · Score: 1
      Apart from finishing the current article and starting new one(s) only then, continuing to read the current article also allows a slow link to finish the non-instantaneous (sometimes painful) process of loading.

      I've you'd used Firefox, you would have a little checkbox that allowed you to choose between the two options sans plugins.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    10. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by qvatch · · Score: 2

      Or, as firefox says, why not both?

    11. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      FlashContol, FlashBlock etc are no longer needed. Both Firefox and Chrome support it out of the box, for all plugins: flash, java applets, silverlight, adobe pdf, etc

    12. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Wow, thanks for the list. I'll have to see if Chrome has anything like "YouTube HD". I hate how YouTube defaults to 480p for me, buffers about 1/2 of the video instantly, then I switch to 720p just to have it reload. Seems so wasteful since I almost exclusive use 720p for my low resolution, except when listening to mix-music.

    13. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by Snotnose · · Score: 1

      Me too. Having the new tab be on top would drive me nuts.

    14. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      I'll add:
      NoScript (stops most of the baddies, just turn on what you need, when you need it)
      Ghostery (clean up what AdBlock Plus and NoScript miss)
      FireSSH (because FTP's inherently insecure)
      Leet Key (great for transforming all sorts of text)
      gTranslate (in-context automatic language translation!)
      Tree Style Tab (if you use lots of tabs)

    15. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      Definitely going to check out some of those, thanks!

    16. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      Chatzilla (IRC Chat)

      Don't give Mozilla any ideas, or the next version of Firefox will have a full fledged IRC client built in. I think they're already working on the kitchen sink.

      Chatzilla has been around for years. It is a full fledged IRC client as an addon - pretty light weight as well.

    17. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A lot of these addons have millions of downloads. Perhaps browser makers need to get the message and include popular functionality that people want.

      And then you end up with Firefox as it is now, (stupid UI decisions aside) losing users who want their browser to be lightweight and only have the plugins that they actually want.

    18. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      A lot of these addons have millions of downloads. Perhaps browser makers need to get the message and include popular functionality that people want.

      Ah, you mean functions like not having the buttons and links bounce up and down because the browser keeps re-organizing the page as it loads new elements? Or refreshes and re-scrolls back to the top while you're halfway down reading something. Or suppressing the pushy ads that shove everything you're trying to look at out of the way?

      Nah. Who'd want a plugin for that?

    19. Re: Browser Makers Should Get The Message by Kvathe · · Score: 1

      You might want to listen to music in 720p as well; according to Google audio from videos at less than 720p plays at a lower bitrate.

    20. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by labnet · · Score: 1

      What. No treetab control.
      This is the first thing I install on Firefox. I have 50+ tabs open at any one time, and don't get how anyone can do that with horizontal tabs.

      --
      46137
    21. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Because they want a reliable way to return to the previous page. If you use the new tab a lot there will be a huge number of history items you would have to back up over to go back to the original page.

      I prefer opening the new tab in back, however. I probably want to keep reading the page I clicked.

      I seem to remember earlier Android browser having two items on the pop-up, one for a foreground tab and another for a background tab. Either my memory is faulty or this was removed a few years ago.

    22. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      I tend not to have that many tabs open at once since they introduced the "reload on restart" (for lack of a better name). Since I've got to reload the content of a tab after a restart of the browser I figure it's faster to just re-search the page rather than sort through the tabs to figure out which tab belongs to what information. Especially since not all tabs have useful title names.

    23. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      Oh and to clarify - normally I wouldn't restart the browser but Windows 8.1 has a limit of 2GB of accessible 32bit memory so every time I launch a game I have to quit firefox or get nag messages from Win8 about low RAM (which pull me out of the game). If I could I'd just leave the browser open.

    24. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Google could include an adblocker that blocks everything but Google ads...?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    25. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      Same here. It's bad enough that searching Google for a word in a page opens Google in the foreground in Chrome.

    26. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Get a real computer? Run 64 bit?

      Who the hell runs games with only 3.5 GB of ram (32 bit limit)?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    27. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      Get a real computer? Run 64 bit?

      Who the hell runs games with only 3.5 GB of ram (32 bit limit)?

      I'm running 64bit but I can't control whether a program runs in 32bit or 64bit. Firefox 64bit will solve the browser portion of it - Win8 is just fucked.

    28. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by WiPEOUT · · Score: 1

      Adblock Edge for those who don't want "acceptable" ads showing up.

    29. Re: Browser Makers Should Get The Message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This makes... no sense. Even with a 32-bit OS, each process gets its own address space. Quitting the browser won't free-up any "more" RAM for your game, regardless of the architecture.

      It may cut-down on swapping to virtual memory, but that's just about speed, not about the OS whining about RAM.

      Are you running with severely limited RAM (my definition would be 2GiB or less for Windows 8, either 32-bit or 64-bit).

    30. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Having them as addons is the browser makers getting the message. Some people want what an addon does, some people don't. Providing capability for addons to deliver functionality is giving people exactly what they want, and not burdening them with stuff they don't want.

      If most people want a certain addon, it could be included by default in a new install. Then the people who don't want it can still remove it. I wish they had done it this way with a Chrome-clone addon that could be removed, instead of converting Firefox into wannabe-Chrome.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    31. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone long press a link and choose "Open in new tab" and not want to view that tab right away?

      Typically when I want to read something straight away I click on it and when I'm done I click back.
      When I open up new tabs I typically want to queue my reading for later and instead continue going down the page.

      There's a good reason for the default behaviour. That said there's no good reason for this not to simply be an optional flag in the settings.

    32. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      A lot of these addons have millions of downloads. Perhaps browser makers need to get the message and include popular functionality that people want.

      Sadly, things look like they're heading in the opposite direction. The first thing I do with a new install of Chromefox is download a pile of extensions to turn it back into Firefox, but it seems like every new release requires even more extensions to undo the Chromefox braindamage. So at least for that browser, the developers are making changes that force you to download more extensions, not less.

    33. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      Or just uncheck the box.

    34. Re: Browser Makers Should Get The Message by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      No. I want to collect the links in the background after reading the parent article. The back button is even worse if it has to reload the original page.

      Which Slashdot does by the way.

    35. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Middle click the link, it does exactly that.

    36. Re:Browser Makers Should Get The Message by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Do you have a reason for using flashcontrol over flashblock? Just curious.

  2. Hola by X10 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hola internet is the most useful plugin. It helps me watch video's from the US, Canada and the UK that are limited to their respective countries. I wonder, I have BBC on my TV, I can rightfully watch any BBC program, but I can't use the service on the bbc web site to watch it a day later. With Hola, I can.

    --
    no, I don't have a sig
    1. Re:Hola by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Same here. I'd check is their website has the download but my job blocks all sites related to proxies.

  3. Adblock by master_kaos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Adblock is the 2nd thing I install on a fresh install (right after Chrome)
    I had the misfortune of having to use a computer that did not have it installed. The internet pretty much seemed unusable.

    1. Re:Adblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I had the same experience. I actually tried to give no ad blocker a chance but so many of the websites I tried to go to would not load in a reasonable amount of time. At first I just stopped following links, but eventually a case came up where really wanted to know what was said on the other side... so installed the ad blocker. It is very strange behavior to make your page unreadable due to advertisements.

    2. Re:Adblock by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Informative

      Adblock, Flashblock, uBlock, Ghostery all pick up slightly different items to block which combined do a pretty good job of breaking things like Facebook (whitelisted) and news sites with embedded non-youtube videos. I just don't watch embedded videos anymore, the article is typically better anyways.
       
      Now that Youtube is HTML5 by default for 99.99% of their videos you can safely enable flashblock for 100% of all sites, the only one I have whitelisted anymore is Pandora because they're stuck in 2007.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:Adblock by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Informative

      Adblock and Ghostery work on an opt-out basis, which is semi-adequate for ads and totally inadequate for tracking. Request Policy is my #1 mandatory extension.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:Adblock by NotDrWho · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      When you hear "The Internet" in 2015, do you seriously still think of telnet, gopher, and ftp?

      Because almost no one else does.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    5. Re:Adblock by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Adblock and uBlock use the same rules and subscriptions. They pick up exactly the same stuff, you don't need both. Ghostery is worth having, or Privacy Badger. Flashblock seems kind of redundant, since you can just enable click-to-play on plug-ins.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Adblock by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 2

      I'd go a little farther and suggest that AdBlock Edge is the most useful plugin. I highly recommend it.

    7. Re:Adblock by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      That's interesting you say they pick up the same stuff, I have both running and Adblock picks up 2 items on this slashdot comment page, while uBlock picks up 3. I made sure I'm blocking everything on both with no whitelisted items.
       
      I am using the Adblock chrome extension from getadblock.com, there are several extensions marketed as "Adblock", maybe we are using different extensions.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    8. Re:Adblock by Fencepost · · Score: 2

      Heh, I reinstalled Windows recently along with switching to a SSD, and apparently didn't install Flash. I didn't miss it until I saw mention of one of the Flash 0-day exploits and a new update, so I went looking to confirm that it had updated.

      Of course, I run with NoScript and RequestPolicy, so I wouldn't have been seeing much Flash content anyway.

      --
      fencepost
      just a little off
    9. Re:Adblock by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Informative

      uBlock and AdBlock do indeed block the same stuff, but if you're going to pick one, go with uBlock, since it's significantly more efficient.

    10. Re:Adblock by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 3, Funny

      Adblock, Flashblock, uBlock, Ghostery all pick up slightly different items to block which combined do a pretty good job of breaking things like Facebook

      Breaking Facebook is a feature, not a bug, right?

      --
      My first program:

      Hell Segmentation fault

    11. Re:Adblock by fisted · · Score: 1, Troll
      I'm not AC, but kind of agree with them, so..

      When you hear "The Internet" in 2015, do you seriously still think of telnet, gopher, and ftp?

      Telnet? Occasionally used to play nethack, or as a replacement for netcat missing on Windows machines
      Gopher? Not really.
      FTP? Erm, yes? Although I don't like the fact, it is still very relevant.

      Because almost no one else does.

      Since you decided to hand-pick examples which suit your argument, let me do the same.
      When you hear "The Internet" in 2015, do you seriously still think of email, XMPP, bittorrent?

      Because almost noone else does.(*)

      (*) Oh, wait.

    12. Re:Adblock by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I use telnet and SFTP, FTPS [not ftp] all the time, but when you say internet I think of a jerk facebooking and playing games on his smart phone constantly, while having a conversation, in the line at the grocery store, while driving, while on the pot... and I think we really screwed that up.

    13. Re:Adblock by firewrought · · Score: 3, Informative

      Request Policy is my #1 mandatory extension.

      For those who are unfamiliar with it, Request Policy works a lot like NoScript... it lists the domains that the page is trying to load *any* content from (not just scripts), and you whitelist which cross-domain loads you want to allow. On slashdot, for instance, I'm allowing requests to fsdn.com, but disallowing them to gstatic.com and scorecardreasearch.com.

      I use it myself, but I can't recommend it. Too much of the web breaks. Credit card payments that bounce to a payment processor's website are especially problematic (I've gotten double-billed at least once). And using it in front of other people is especially awkward when I have to fiddle with a new site for a few minutes to get it to work. Also, I don't know that this provides that much better privacy than AdBlock+EasyPrivacy or some of the host-file blacklists.

      Maybe with some extra development Request Policy could be a lot easier. Integration with (or incorporation into) NoScript and/or a community of well-maintained whitelists would make a big difference.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    14. Re:Adblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      APKBlock is also good. Especially for slashdot. It lets you block that arsehole, and unlike HostsBlock, you can still read the rest of slashdot.

    15. Re:Adblock by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The only way they could be different is if you have different subscriptions or if you have the AdBlock whitelist enabled.... Just checking, you didn't have both running at the same time, right?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:Adblock by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Yes, both at the same time, perhaps uBlock is intercepting one before it has a chance to run on Adblock? This is consistent behavior.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    17. Re:Adblock by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Seeing all of these comments about adblock, I will now do a test to see what happens.

      Adblock
      Adblock Edge
      Ghostery

      I wonder if my thoughts are correct on an automated search engine posting certain responses.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    18. Re:Adblock by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I bought a new PC recently, plugged it and go. Fuck me I couldn't believe what an abomination the Internet has become without adblock. I listen to commercial free radio, record all my TV shows so I can fast forward ads, and download movies to avoid ads at theatres. When you live in a relatively ad-free existence, then get dropped into the world everyone else is exposed to, it's truly an assault on your brain.

    19. Re:Adblock by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If you are running both then they are competing for the same stuff to block. Try disabling one and then the other, and re-check your counts. Also make sure you have the same subscriptions in each, and the whitelist turned off in ABP.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:Adblock by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      if you like adblock you will hate it after you try ublock. it's adblock without the bloat.

  4. DNSSEC validation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why of course a TLS validator: https://www.dnssec-validator.cz/
    Death to the CA cartels! Support self-signed TLS certificates with a DNSSEC/TLSA Validator

  5. Re:My favorites by aahpandasrun · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm so bored I reply sarcastically on Slashdot! So random!

  6. addons by aahpandasrun · · Score: 2

    Definitely Adblock, Lastpass, Chrome Remote Desktop, and Tampermonkey. There's a great gmail pop3 mail checker for my pop3 only work email that works with gmail: http://www.danielslaughter.com...

  7. Clearly AdBlock by GroeFaZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I do regret the real financial consequences for creators whose content I consume and appreciate, the annoyance factor and sometimes security risks of online advertising far outstrip my capacity for caring. Pure text ads would be fine by me, but as soon as ads start screaming at me audio-visually, I turn them the fuck off, no matter how much I like the content they surround.

    --
    The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
    1. Re:Clearly AdBlock by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      And the response from the advertisers, like with the advent of DVRs, is more ads, more annoying, and louder... which only drives more people to avoid them. They don't understand the circular hell they are putting themselves in, or why they are failing.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:Clearly AdBlock by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Google seems to get it just about right. The only complaint I have with Google is that they will whore out just about any AD, regardless of utility.

      Do a search for MalwareBytes and take a look at the the ADs. Useful?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Clearly AdBlock by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Honestly, the security is the real slam dunk for me.

      If ads were served through the same channels as the rest of the page, and from the same sources, with the same basic level of trustworthiness, I'd be inclined to be at least slightly conflicted about the poor starving site operator; but that's not how it works anymore. Even relatively 'respectable' ad networks are an architectural nightmare; practically designed to make malicious injection easy. The less respectable ones are no better and don't even bother to try to restrain bad actors.

      Whatever arguments there are to be made about some 'implicit contract' to put up with ads as part of the ad-supported-model there may be, there is nothing that justifies the security clusterfuck that is ad distribution. You might as well just scavenge for used needles and shove them into your neck hoping for some left-over drugs as accept ads injected into a page.

    4. Re:Clearly AdBlock by asimons04 · · Score: 2

      Mod this up. If advertisers didn't look at Times Square and think, "Yes! This! But...like, everywhere! And louder! And spammier! Maybe throw in 3 autoplaying videos and a few infectious diseases (malvertising)", I wouldn't be so inclined to block ads. As it stands, they can fuck right off.

      And content creators aren't off the hook, either. They should vet their ads instead of just allowing whatever scumbag ad-network to throw whatever onto the page (looking at you, Taboola). I think Hack-a-Day does a good job with that; their ads are simple, static images and are relevant to the target audience. Site owners/operators also need to give visitors the option of actually paying them. Case in point is Ars Technica which allows users to subscribe for an ad-free experience or use the site for free with ads. If more sites would adopt similar models, we might stand a chance of taking the internet back from the sensory-raping advertising cartels. I subscribe to Ars and whitelist Hack-a-Day in AdBlock because they make a genuine effort to improve the situation for their audiences. Slashdot allows me to disable advertising, so there is no need to block ads here. I like that these sites are setting an example, but the rest of the internet (or world-wide-web for you pedantic fuckers) needs to pay attention.

    5. Re:Clearly AdBlock by Lorens · · Score: 1

      I've run without AdBlock since forever, because hey the guys running the content get money that way, and sometimes the ads are useful, sometimes I click, and sometimes I've even bought... but just this week I encountered an ad by Essilor that just wouldn't shut up, with the useless AdChoices button but without the X to get rid of it. I closed the page, installed Adblock, went back to finish the page. Three days later I am definitely not missing all those ads!

    6. Re:Clearly AdBlock by Trogre · · Score: 1

      This. A thousand times this.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    7. Re:Clearly AdBlock by s.t.a.l.k.e.r._loner · · Score: 1

      The static ads stopped working. Don't you remember the good old days when static banners were all there was? And do you remember how you'd completely tune out that top section of every website?

  8. My lists by Nexion · · Score: 5, Interesting

    FireFox:

    noscript
    ghostery
    noredirect
    firebug
    flash video downloader

    Chrome:
    scriptno
    ghostery

    1. Re:My lists by Jahta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A couple more for Firefox:

      BetterPrivacy - Deals with "super cookies"
      HTTPS-Everywhere - Transparently turns HTTP requests into HTTPS requests for sites that support it

      TableTools2 - Sort, filter, copy, etc. table data, even if the web site doesn't support it
      Vimperator - Not for everybody, but if you use vi as your editor this adds a lot of keyboard goodness to your browsing experience.

    2. Re:My lists by RandCraw · · Score: 1

      A good list. For Firefox I'd add:

      Ant Video Downloader
      Cookies Manager+
      Flashblock
      Web Of Trust
      Zoom Page

      On Windows 7 where gadgets are broken, I also like Weather Forecast.

    3. Re:My lists by joelgrimes · · Score: 1

      It's a sad commentary that all the most useful plugins fall into the category of "protect me from bad guys" rather than "help me do something awesome".

    4. Re:My lists by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      At least now you could protect yourself from the bad guys if you want to or if you care to. In the bad old days of IE domination, you could not even if you wanted to.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re:My lists by coop247 · · Score: 1

      Firebug is amazing in every way, if it didn't exist I wouldn't be a web developer. When there is a chrome specific issue and I have to use their debugger it is so very painful.

      Abduction is another good one, lets you save any part of your browser to an image, quality is always better than screencapture.

      --
      //TODO: Insert catchy phrase
    6. Re:My lists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      pentadactyl >> vimperator

    7. Re:My lists by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Knights carry more armor than swords...

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  9. web designers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not the browsers fault, it's the web designers. when I have my add-ons on full privacy mode, I cannot use any of my financial sites. Web designers are under the impression that input checking always has to be done on the client side.

    And Yahoo!'s web pages are so crappy they don't even render correctly when I have all my add-ons running.

    Google does it right - their pages don't require all the bells and whistles to be turned on in order to view the page.

    But anyway, non of these add-ons would be required if web designers weren't so inept.

    1. Re:web designers by whopub · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not the web designers' fault! I'm a small time self employed web designer. When it comes to designing a website, we don't do what we want! We don't even do what the customer needs. We end up doing what he asks. Most of the time what they ask for sucks, and that's what they/you get.

    2. Re:web designers by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So you're saying that the customer demands cross-site scripting hell, where to look at a simple article I have to have fifteen different sites' javascript enabled, including probably half a dozen ad/tracking sites that have nothing to do with reading text on a screen?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:web designers by gauauu · · Score: 4, Informative

      So you're saying that the customer demands cross-site scripting hell, where to look at a simple article I have to have fifteen different sites' javascript enabled, including probably half a dozen ad/tracking sites that have nothing to do with reading text on a screen?

      Yes.

    4. Re:web designers by pspahn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, that's exactly what they're saying. Was there something you weren't clear about?

      Do you think developers just sit around all day looking for tracking scripts to start installing on client's sites?

      Since the advent of saving markup in the DB, clients have become empowered on what code runs on their site. They google something, find a script snippet that they don't understand, copy and paste it into their CMS' "additional header scripts" field and save. They don't understand the concept of optimizing image files, let alone be concerned with the number HTTP requests on each load.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    5. Re:web designers by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Funny
      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    6. Re:web designers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With all third-party resources blocked, that is an almost empty page. If you allow access only to s3.amazonaws.com, you get all the content you'd expect on that page. The page still wants to load from 8 more domains though. I find that amusingly self-referential, but I sincerely doubt it is intentional.

    7. Re:web designers by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      You're making a flimsy assumption that there is valuable content on the web.

    8. Re:web designers by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not the web designers' fault! I'm a small time self employed web designer. When it comes to designing a website, we don't do what we want! We don't even do what the customer needs. We end up doing what he asks. Most of the time what they ask for sucks, and that's what they/you get.

      If you have so little input into the process as that, you're not a technical professional, you're a prostitute.

    9. Re:web designers by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      You're making a flimsy assumption that there is valuable content on the web.

      Given the number of people who do it over other activities, that's a pretty easy assumption to make.

    10. Re:web designers by TWX · · Score: 1

      How the hell do you think I know how many sites it's trying to cross-site-script to load?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    11. Re:web designers by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Web designers are under the impression that input checking always has to be done on the client side.

      I don't know much about this sort of thing, but doesn't that mean that anyone who edits the client program to eliminate those checks can hack your site?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    12. Re:web designers by OffTheWallSoccer · · Score: 1

      It's not the web designers' fault! I'm a small time self employed web designer. When it comes to designing a website, we don't do what we want! We don't even do what the customer needs. We end up doing what he asks. Most of the time what they ask for sucks, and that's what they/you get.

      If you have so little input into the process as that, you're not a technical professional, you're a prostitute.

      Have you ever worked directly with customers? Not all customers are savvy or intelligent, and your advice to change their foolish request will fall on deaf ears. It is a genuine pleasure to work with smart customers, because they will generally listen to design advice and understand the concepts.

    13. Re:web designers by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Actually, the smart customers can be the worst. There's a reason that they say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

      Engineers work with customers. But if the customer want something unrealistic, the engineers push back. If what the customer wants is too far out of line, they don't merely advise, they refuse. Same with architects and physicians.

      One of the hallmarks of being a professional is that the professional is expected to have experience and understanding and the autonomy to say "no". If you don't have that, you can't count yourself as a professional.

    14. Re:web designers by OffTheWallSoccer · · Score: 1

      Actually, the smart customers can be the worst. There's a reason that they say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

      Engineers work with customers. But if the customer want something unrealistic, the engineers push back. If what the customer wants is too far out of line, they don't merely advise, they refuse. Same with architects and physicians.

      One of the hallmarks of being a professional is that the professional is expected to have experience and understanding and the autonomy to say "no". If you don't have that, you can't count yourself as a professional.

      Agree 100%. My team and I have said no to some pretty big/important customers. However, the customer will occasionally escalate the issue, sometimes to 2 or 3 levels above me. At that point it's a coin flip as to whether upper management listens to engineering reason or to the customer.

  10. Web of Trust by Saysys · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Web of Trust rates pages before you click on them and when you hit a pop-up it blocks the page if it's not trustworthy until you explicitly give the pop-up permission.

    1. Re:Web of Trust by Tink2000 · · Score: 2

      I came in to recommend WOT as well. I install it on all of my clients computers and it really helps cut down on those malicious links because it puts a big red circle beside untrustworthy links.

    2. Re:Web of Trust by toygeek · · Score: 1

      I do the same thing. Every clients computer gets AdBlockPlus and WOT. HUGE helper.

  11. FYI - Chrome's Task Manager by RevWaldo · · Score: 2

    Chrome has its own task manager under More Tools Task Manager, so you can see which extensions are gumming up the works.

    .

  12. Remove Google tracking by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 2

    This nice plugin will ease your life while searching for information on google by removing URL tracking.
    Adblock is also a plugin I use almost always, but I had to disable it on some ecommerce sites, since it causes the merchant goods to disappear!

  13. Not sure if this is an "extension" by msobkow · · Score: 1

    Flash.

    :P :P :P

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Not sure if this is an "extension" by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Closely followed by Java.

      I mean, seriously -- how *else* are you supposed to transfer control of your browser to a nefarious third party?

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  14. Re:Bare minimum by fisted · · Score: 1

    [...] and I know people who swear by Tree Style Tabs

    Reporting in.

  15. Re:My favorites by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Blue! No! Yelloooooooooooooooooooooooow!

  16. IE tab by slorge · · Score: 1

    IE Tab, for when you absolutely have to...

    --
    Some people are like slinkys. They're useless, but it puts a smile on your face to push them down the stairs.
  17. Implicit assumption by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    There is a huge assumption implicit in this question - the browser that you use.

    Not all of those plugins are available for all browsers. And any recommended plugin really needs to identify the ecosystem that it works in.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  18. Chrome Apps/Extensions by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1
    • Authy App - Two-factor auth for Android and Desktop... syncs your auth stuff across devices so you don't have one point of failure. I don't like the companion extension, I just use the app.
    • PushBullet - Notification sync between Android and Desktop. Quick Reply to SMS and IMs from desktop. Push links from one device to another.
    • Google Keep - There is also a purely web version available so an app isn't totally necessary but i find it useful as a synced todo list between my Android and desktop.
    • HTTP Switchboard - Like NoScript (plus partial AdBlock) for Firefox, but a bit cleaner, and it starts out with a good whitelist. microBlock is an alternative based off of this project that simplifies things if HTTP Switchboard is too complex.
    • HTTPS Everywhere - Use HTTPS whenever it's available.
    • iChrome New Tab - Styled roughly like the now-dead iGoogle, it brings a bunch of services together on your new tab page. I can see my e-mail and RSS feed new items in one spot, which is nice.
    • Reddit Enhancement Suite - If you use Reddit this is a must.
    • Enhanced Steam - If you use Steam this is a must.
    • Chrome Remote Desktop - Access your desktop from another device. Punches through firewalls and routers automatically.
    1. Re:Chrome Apps/Extensions by technomom · · Score: 1

      Pushbullet is also surprisingly handy when you're using Chromecast. It pops up Play, Pause, Stop buttons on your desktop. Handy for when you might have walked away from your phone and are at your desk. Also, the shared clipboard feature is absolutely wonderful if you can get over the creepiness of it.

    2. Re:Chrome Apps/Extensions by ezelkow1 · · Score: 1

      big +1 to enhanced steam, adds so many useful features and allows you to remove the cruft

      Its a shame steam shafted the dev, they invited him to come talk with them about features, enhancements, etc, and then basically jacked all his ideas and implemented his features 2 years after he did it and refused to offer him a job even when he was struggling to make ends meet

    3. Re:Chrome Apps/Extensions by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Chrome Remote Desktop - Access your desktop from another device. Punches through firewalls and routers automatically.

      Unfortunately, it does that by making Google a 3rd party(I think that they even handle the authentication) in every connection you make between two of your own computers. They aren't privy to the actual content of the interaction, to the best of my knowledge; but that still creeps me the hell out.

      It's unfortunate, really. An architecturally-modern successor to VNC(ie. same platform-agnostic low level approach; but taking advantage of the fact that most devices can, often with dedicated coprocessors, pump out a very nice H.264 stream or similar as easily or more easily than retro JPEG tiling stuff, along with a dose of some sort of remotely modern authentication) would be fantastic; but CRD doesn't even offer a 'the host is right on the same damn subnet, no, I don't need Google looking over my shoulder to connect to it!' mode.

  19. Self-Destructing Cookies by KlomDark · · Score: 2

    Doesn't cure all the ways they try to track you, but definitely puts a major dent in their efforts:

    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...

  20. Re:My small list to add by anarcobra · · Score: 1

    I also use https everywhere and I use privacy badger.

  21. Scrapbook in Firefox by BrendaEM · · Score: 2

    I have over 3,000 webpages and over 2000 links saved and organized in Scrapbook. Scrapbook can recursively safe entire websites. Searching for good information is tedious with search engines. Webpages come and go. Scrapbook lets you build a library, your own personal knowledgeable over years. You can highlight text and save the results, too. All the webpages can be be organized in a tree-like hierarchal manner.

    The only issue with it has to do with synchronization and differential backups. It should be rewritten to save Mozilla Archive Format files MAFF's so that synchronization would be quicker from machine to machine.

    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
    1. Re:Scrapbook in Firefox by markh100 · · Score: 1

      I have over 3,000 webpages and over 2000 links saved and organized in Scrapbook. Scrapbook can recursively safe entire websites. Searching for good information is tedious with search engines. Webpages come and go. Scrapbook lets you build a library, your own personal knowledgeable over years. You can highlight text and save the results, too. All the webpages can be be organized in a tree-like hierarchal manner.

      The only issue with it has to do with synchronization and differential backups. It should be rewritten to save Mozilla Archive Format files MAFF's so that synchronization would be quicker from machine to machine.

      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...

      Just don't use Scrapbook on Slashdot. I got banned from Slashdot several times, because I wanted to save a single article to read while taking transit home. I once got my entire office banned from Slashdot.

  22. adblock, flashblock, ghostery and noscript by schleprock63 · · Score: 1

    i very much agree with GroeFaz, when the ads completely drown out everything else on my machine (whether it's a pc, tablet or phone) they have to be blocked. this is especially true of ads with annoying audio. on my pc if it's just a visual ad i can switch to another desktop and not be bothered, but when the ad contains audio, game over. someday enough people will be using ad blocking technology to where the the people paying for the ads will not see any return on their money. at that point, advertisers will begin to go away (or at least in my dreams they'll go away!)

  23. Save As by jodido · · Score: 1

    (or print to) pdf. Most useful after AdBlock.

  24. Tab Tree especially for work by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    All the tabs as a tree on the left. Very useful. All links opened from a tab nest under it. Trees can collapsed at any node. Most important feature is that I can collapse the tree to keep the logos and first website names from prying eyes at work. When I use WebEx or Google+ to share a desktop, I don't want sites like DailyKos, Mother Jones or Salon to show up in the tab line. Now it gets conveniently collapsed under "C++ STL Reference" ;-)

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  25. RequestPolicy and NoScript by FeatherBoa · · Score: 1

    I use many plugins and my go-to ones are CookieMonster, Ghostery, FlashBlock, NoScript and RefControl. CookieMonster, Ghostery and Flashblock are easy to get used to, but NoScript and RefControl make an interesting pair.

    Using these at first is incredibly painful. It is a true education how fragile the construction of some web sites is, with scripts and components coming from all over the place. Because you have to approve every cross site reference, separately to load and to execute scripts, you really get a feel for how cobbled-together some sites really are -- random CSSs loading from who knows where, scripts from google, trackers, CDNs, web design houses, software vendors -- a real dogs breakfast. It can be a challenge to work out how much actually has to run in order for the site to work, versus how much is analytics and advertising overheads.

    As I type this, scripts from three different google tracking systems, as well as rpxnow and ooyala, whoever they are, are NOT running in my browser. But for some reason slashdot won't work without loading some junk from fsdn.com.

  26. Extensions? by mrbene · · Score: 1

    Not really sure that any extensions that I install are particularly "useful". However, here's a list of tools that I find especially useful that have to do with web browsing.

    • Fiddler (now Fiddler4). Still a solid debugging proxy.
    • PrivateInternetAccess or any other system-level VPN. Running it as a browser extension seems risky, even given the WebRTC issue with VPNs.
    • On Chrome, the browser extension "Cookies", which enables reasonable cookie management when debugging.
    • WGET and cURL

    OK, I snuck an actual browser extension in there. But it really only enables what should be core functionality.

  27. Tab Mix Plus by CityZen · · Score: 3, Informative

    I can't understand why "focus last selected tab" isn't default on all browsers. Essentially, I need ctrl-tab to work as well as alt-tab does with applications. I have to have Tab Mix Plus in order to get this as well as other features that let me control how/where tabs pop up.

    1. Re:Tab Mix Plus by wile_e8 · · Score: 2

      Does anyone know if there is a good equivalent to this on Chrome? I've switched primarily from Firefox to Chrome for multiple other reasons, but the one thing I really miss about Firefox is Tab Mix Plus and customizing ctrl+tab most recently used, tab opening at the end, most recent when closing a tab, etc. Everything I've tried works extremely unreliably, and nothing overrides ctrl+tab behavior (I think this is a Chrome limitation, not an extension problem).

    2. Re:Tab Mix Plus by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

      Yes, Tab Mix Plus is essential for me. I use it extensively to do things like manage saving and restoring of sessions, change the font and text colour of tabs for instant identification of state, undoing a Close Tab command, closing a tab by double-clicking the tab, and opening a new tab by double clicking the tab bar. When I'm forced to use a browser that doesn't have it I go a little bit crazy and my efficiency drops enormously.

      Aside from the usual security and privacy addons, another one I find indispensable is Flashblock. I tend to have many YouTube tabs open at once, and Flashblock calms my urge to strangle and dismember whatever fuckwit decided that videos should play automatically as soon as the page loads.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  28. No Script, of course. by lowen · · Score: 1

    The only absolutely essential addon for me is NoScript. Everything else is gravy; tasty gravy perhaps, but gravy. HTTPSEverywhere is really high on the gravy list.

    1. Re:No Script, of course. by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      I love noscript, but it's practically impossible for a non-techy to use. It's second nature to me, but very obvious when my wife tries to look something up on one of my computers. "Oh right, I forgot, yeah, you'll need to decipher and selectively enable 8 different domains to view that recipe for chocolate cookies."

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  29. all-in-one gestures by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Am a great fan of gesture based navigation. Right click + up for new tab, L-shape for close tab left/right for back and forward.

  30. SSL and HSTS by jukk · · Score: 1

    From the ones already listed, and in addition, I would like to point out HTTPS-everywhere, Calomel SSL Validation and Strict Transport Security (HSTS is important!). FlagFox for fun.

  31. Quality by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    ...my question: what are your most useful (and safe) browser extensions?...

    The ones that have a level of quality that is on par with the browser. I've found too many extensions that are so buggy that they are useless.

  32. My favorite Firefox Extensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you're a collector, there are 3 must-have extensions for Firefox.

    DownThemAll: Lets you download embedded and linked files on a page, with pretty good filtering options.
    VideoDownloadHelper: Lets you download streaming videos.
    Save Images: Download multiple images at once.

    Others:

    Right To Click: If pages disable right-clicking, this extension allows you to re-enable it.
    Print Edit: Remove elements from a page before printing or turning it into a PDF.
    Classic Theme Restorer: Get rid of the Australis interface and re-enable options Firefox took away in recent versions.

    I have several other extensions as well, but they're just tweaks for my own personal preferences. The ones above, along with the usual Adblock, Ghostery, and Flashblock, are the ones I recommend to everyone.

  33. Vimperator by Damnshock · · Score: 1

    It's the main reason why I am sticking to Firefox and not use any other browser (chromium, rekonq, arora, konqueror...)

  34. Some unmentioned FF's by Falos · · Score: 1

    Here's a couple of little QoL perks I haven't seen (I skimmed) mentioned:

    * Text-to-link (or something like that) or any other equivalent that will grab URLs and hyperlink them. You should (as always) double-check the actual destination of a weird link/post/message.

    * Text-to-image (or something like that) is a toss-up. Any direct IMG link will be displayed in-page (handy on forums), but sometimes it makes layouts look a little awkward. You can blacklist sites (use wildcard) or pages from triggering it.

    * Used to have one that would try to capture text fields (like the post I'm writing) and would allow for some historical fetching, like if your browser crashes or a Next Page load fails. L*S did one gag dedicated to just this. Might want to check the fine boilerplate (I didn't) or just skip it if you're super-tinfoil, seeing captures of yourself can feel uncanny. Some of you may already be in the habit of clipboard/notepad dumping for safety, but consider that automation is consistent.

    Echoing on NoScript and RequestPolicy, they're privacy tweaks but also improve safety. After whitelists are done, page layout and even load times can improve. Take control of what your machines accesses.

  35. We'd like your feedback... by SoCalChris · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is there an extension that blocks these "We'd like your feedback" messages that seem to be popping up on every single site lately? Or a way to block them easily with AdBlock?

    1. Re:We'd like your feedback... by firewrought · · Score: 1

      I've heard that "element hiding helper" can assist with this. However, it's also easy to right-click on an item in FireFox, select "Inspect Element" and then figure out a rule to hide the content (though you'll have to consult the documentation). For instance, Slashdot has a "Site Notice" that will appear at the top of every page (unless you accept the cookies/whatever to suppress showing it). I added the rule "slashdot.org##div#sitenotice" to suppress it (though it has since been added to EasyList).

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    2. Re:We'd like your feedback... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      To expand on this is there any plugin which can stop all canvas pop-ups?

      It seems we spent years getting to a point where we blocked pop-ups only to now have the damn things re-appear using HTML5.

    3. Re:We'd like your feedback... by cavebison · · Score: 1

      > Is there an extension that blocks these "We'd like your feedback" messages that seem to be popping up on every single site lately?

      Not that I've seen, but if it's a site you frequent then try using the Element Hiding Helper for AdBlock Plus. Once you learn a little about HTML, enough to understand how the hiding works, I find it *very* effective at removing the popups, and anything else on a site that I want to remove for one reason or another (usually distracting sidebar stuff).

    4. Re:We'd like your feedback... by cavebison · · Score: 1

      > To expand on this is there any plugin which can stop all canvas pop-ups?

      Not that I've seen, but if it's a site you frequent then try using the Element Hiding Helper for AdBlock Plus. Once you learn a little about HTML, enough to understand how the hiding works, I find it *very* effective at removing the popups, and anything else on a site that I want to remove for one reason or another (usually distracting sidebar stuff).

    5. Re:We'd like your feedback... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I was hoping for something more automatic.

      Also based on the other comments in on this story I just removed Adblock Plus in favour of uBlock. I run a lot of tabs in a session at once and it appears to work much faster and use considerably less memory when I have something like 30+ tabs open.

  36. My list by technomom · · Score: 1

    - Pushbullet for all the reasons given by others here.

    - uBlock - ad blocking that is not opted out of by the highest bidder

    - Airdroid - okay, technically not an extension/app but still a good app for extending your phone's reach to your desktop.

    - Sunrise - nicely done Chrome app that looks and plays just like the mobile version.

    - Chrome Remote Desktop - Very handy for making my iMac usable from anywhere and also for doing remote help for mom and dad when they call with computer problems.

  37. most useful browser extensions by jjbenz · · Score: 1

    noscript, that is all.

  38. Imgur/TinyURL by Guy+From+V · · Score: 1

    I love the Imgur Uploader and TinyURL Generator addons. Imgur is my fave pichost, the addon doesn't even make you save the pic to the HDD. A right & left click auto-copies the right code and pastes it...everything's in the pipe 5 x 5, Spunkmeyer.

  39. My (Chrome) List by drkvogel · · Score: 1

    Chrome to Phone (send a link from your desk/laptop to your phone to view later)
    Snipe (search and locate tabs)
    Diigo bookmark (best alternative to Delicious after Delicious went downhill - save links to cloud with tags etc)
    Tabs Outliner (manage windows and tabs, recover sessions, hibernate windows and tabs - absolutely awesome!)
    AdBlock (of course)

  40. ColorToggle, Hostname in Titlebar, FocyOverride by paulrrogers · · Score: 1

    ColorToggle has made the web so much easier on the eyes, stopping all the bleach white backgrounds. Hostname in Titlebar also makes auto-typing with KeePass less spoof-able and more reliable. My own FocyOverride has also helped make KeePass a bit easier to use. Having used some blocking add-on's like RequestPolicy I don't feel comfortable with the shady practice of consuming content without paying the price of seeing the ads.

    1. Re:ColorToggle, Hostname in Titlebar, FocyOverride by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Having used some blocking add-on's like RequestPolicy I don't feel comfortable with the shady practice of consuming content without paying the price of seeing the ads.

      I don't feel comfortable with the risky practice of consuming content and paying the price of exploit attempts via ad networks. It used to only happen on "sketchy" websites. Now big name news sites and the like are using sketchy ad networks that occasionally try to push malware. I've reached the point where I don't mind spending ten minutes figuring out which domains I can temporarily unblock safely for a site. It's rare that I go to "new" sites anyway. And ad domains are always blocked without question. If the site wants to host ads, they can do it the old fashioned way and host them on their own servers (and accept responsibility for the exploit attempts).

  41. EHH by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    I recommend the 'element hiding helper' for adblock plus.
    Additionally to the local ads, it allowed me to easily remove sports, games, promotions, donation reminders, religious stuff and other unwanted things from my usual sources.

  42. For Chrome by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

    Chrome: Adblock Plus, Web Of Trust, (WOT), Xmarks, Context Menu Search (allows you to highlight text as a search parameter and open results in a new tab. ex: Dictionary.com, Wikipedia, Google, etc)

  43. Mine by arielCo · · Score: 2

    Open in Browser: Because some sites insist that I should save that PDF to open it.
    Session Manager: a.k.a. "task freezer". Save and restore any or all of your open windows and tabs along with their histories.
    Google and TinEye Reverse Image search. TinEye's matching engine is more powerful; Google has a much bigger database.
    Offline QR code Generator: the easiest way to send page/image/link URLs and arbitrary text to my phone: [highlight text if applicable,] right click on page/image/link, "Show QR", aim phone.
    Restartless Restart: Because it's Firefox and Control-Alt-R is much faster than killing the process.
    Context Search X: highlight, right click, "Search with", pick any of my engines. Very flexible; allows custom accelerator keys.
    Context Highlight: highlight multiple words or phrases all over the current page. Not perfect but really useful.
    Live HTTP headers: Disabled since Fx ships with devtools.
    It's All Text!: Edit those pesky textareas in your preferred editor. Perfect for HTML boards and wikis.

    And obviously Adblock Plus.

    Not shown: custom search engines for Google Images, Wiktionary, Google Translate, Gmail...

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  44. Lazarus saves the day, FoxClocks, Netcraft by Guy+Smiley · · Score: 1

    I work with a lot of web-based tools (bugzilla, Jira, wikis, etc.) that include a lot of writing. Being able to autosave and recover web form input has saved me many hours of effort after the browser crashed, laptop ran out of battery, accidentally closing a tab, etc.

    I also work with people all around the world, so Fox Clocks is very helpful by adding clocks for various cities to the Firefox status bar and/or a mouseover popup.

    Haven't seen Netcraft Anti-Phishing bar mentioned yet either. It is helpful to detect malicious sites, and always interesting to see a bit of info on websites I visit (Slashdot currently ranks 8806 and has been around since March 2002 it tells me).

    Also using NoScript, Tabmix Plus, WOT, Cookie Controller.

  45. Is there an extension that...? by cjellibebi · · Score: 1

    ...when you visit a clickbait site such as Cracked.com, blocks all the "you may also be interested in" stuff so that you just see what you came to see and don't get distracted into visiting millions of other "10 signs you are a serial procrastinator, number 5 will turn your underwear into a war-zone" links?

    So far, after Googling, I have only been able to find "Anti-Upworthy" which de-sensationalises the language of clickbait headlines, but ideally, I'd like to block the display of "you may also be interested in" stuff. And no, using a .hosts file to block the offending site is not an answer because I don't get to see the original article I came to see.

    1. Re:Is there an extension that...? by henni16 · · Score: 1

      You might want to have a look at deslide.clusterfake.net.
      It's not a browser extension, but there's a bookmarklet.
      If your particular clickbait slideshow/listicle site happens to be supported, it'll reformat the clickbait into a single page and discard everything but the actual content.

    2. Re:Is there an extension that...? by O-Deka-K · · Score: 1

      Sometimes "Element Hiding Helper for Adblock Plus" can help with that. It can block an HTML element based on its name, id, size, etc. When you use it, it selects the element under your mouse pointer and outlines it in red. Then you can use the hotkeys (there's a handy popup that displays them) to select the exact element you want and block it.

      It's also useful for blocking certain ad boxes. As long as the element has some kind of identifying feature, you should be able to block it. Some sites get around it by randomizing the name/id or not having any identifying features.

    3. Re:Is there an extension that...? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      One of my recent pet peeves are the "similar article" links that 1) actually go to other sites, 2) don't seem to be tied to the article I'm reading, and 3) straddle the NSFW line. Specifically, I might be at work looking at an article about some technology-related issue and one of the "similar articles" at the end suddenly has a thumbnail image that I wouldn't want my boss to see if he suddenly appeared behind me. Nothing X-rated, mind you, but nothing I'd purposefully look at at work. I'd love to just block these outright and not have to worry about them coming up.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  46. pentadactyl by countach44 · · Score: 1

    The main reason I still use firefox.

  47. Exactly! by dfm3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I had mod points, I'd mod you up.

    First, having a platform onto which developers can build plugins that users can choose from and enable as needed is far superior to being stuck with the single half-baked implementation that is built in to the browser.

    Second, building features directly into browsers eliminates any chance of security-through-obscurity that comes with an ecosystem of security and ad blocking plugins. Two examples: popup blockers (everything is done in javascript now), and the do not track header (arguably, useless even before major browsers implemented it, but even more useless now...)

    1. Re:Exactly! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      The sole reason Do Not Track was useless was that it was voluntary, and too many interests simply didn't want to honor it. I was really amused by all the cries of "But... but... our ad revenue will dry up and the internet will die!" Hahaha. Script blockers do the same thing, better, without any volunteerism, and the internet hasn't died. "I told you so" comes to mind.

      I would add a couple of add-ons to the list above:

      * Disconnect, and Disconnect Search, respectively, block 3rd-party requests and do anonymous search.

      * Bloody Vikings! lets you create temporary email addresses for those sites that insist on an email address before you can move forward. (Name comes from Monty Python "Spam!" skit.)

      * Privacy Badger, from EFF intelligently blocks 3rd-party cookies and tracking. (They tried to make an add-on for Chrome too but announced that it was too difficult and they had given up.)

      * User Agent Switcher, mainly for developers, lets you change your browser user agent.

      * YSlow, cleverly named add-on from Yahoo, shows developers why web pages are slow.

      * Lightbeam from Mozilla shows a good view third parties that have tried to track your browsing over time.

  48. NukeAnything by hwk_br · · Score: 1

    Remove any section of the loaded HTML... Perfect if you want to copy/paste content when event the print version of a site has tons of ads/logo/etc... (no Chrome support, unfortunately)

    --
    \m/
  49. adblock* by steak · · Score: 1

    adblock or adblock plus (for now) or adblock edge.

  50. A comment in which I gush over uMatrix by Mobius+Evalon · · Score: 1

    Until approximately a month ago, I used Firefox. The extensions I made the most use of were all privacy related:
    NoScript (duh)
    Ghostery (allowed me to block the little niggling crap scripts allowed through from the first party domain with NoScript)
    Self destructing cookies (whitelisting cookies, brilliant idea)
    BetterPrivacy (dealt with flash cookies, though I think Firefox handles those itself now)
    Scriptish (which is 99% scripts I make for my own use, like removing the sitenotice node here on Slashdot)

    Then I switched to Chrome and got uMatrix, and felt like a complete pleb. It never quite dawns on you the kind of content amalgamation a simple webpage actually is until you have a comprehensive breakdown by subdomain of where every cookie, script, XML HTTP request, plugin, CSS file, image, etc. is all coming from. It even has built-in options to spoof your useragent and clear the browser cache on regular intervals, spoof referers, block hyperlink auditing, etc. Switch that bad-boy into what I call "hostile mode" (block everything that the user does not explicitly whitelist) and you feel like Gandalf.

    uMatrix covers the function of Noscript and Ghostery very well, and I found an extension called Tab Cookie which covers the function of Self Destructing Cookies. Tampermonkey replaced Scriptish, though I've yet to find something with a similar function to BetterPrivacy. Hulu is one of the sites I frequent with a flash cookie whose existence is obvious (the volume level) and I've noticed it is not resetting between logins, so it must not be handled by TabCookie.

    --
    Potatoes are friggin' magical. Can you power an alarm clock with a carrot? No, sir!
  51. an extension to neuter Chrome auto-updates? by jlv · · Score: 1

    Is there an extension to prevent Chrome from automatically updating extensions?

    (I'm tired of finding something I was depending upon no longer working because I got an "update")

  52. Re:Welcome to the post-OS computer world! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Extensions to the browser? This used to be called "programs you install on your computer". Weird.

    I'm pretty sure that 'extensions' 'plugins' and the like have been recognized as distinct from full 'programs'(even if, in practice, the line is architecturally somewhat blurry, depending on how elegant the extension mechanism provided by the main program is).

    I know that I was using Winamp plugins well before I had a remotely reliable internet connection, and most sufficiently sprawling programs tend to spawn a plugin or extension mechanism sooner or later. In fact, some are barely more than a default set of plugins lodged in a labyrinthine mechanism for adding more(looking at you, Lotus Notes...)

  53. Jasper's List by muffbagmuffbagmuffba · · Score: 1

    Lazarus Form Recovery - keeps a continuous history of all forms. Essential if your job consists of manipulating web interfaces all day.
    Saved Password Editor - Clue's in the name.
    Check4Changes - Reloads a page and alerts you [sound or email] when a specific element has changed.
    reallyremember - saves passwords on forms with autocomplete="off" set .
    Tree Style Tab - move the tabs to the side of the browser instead of the top.

  54. uBlock by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    uBlock is great because it's a good ad blocker with minimal overhead. it works on firefox and chrome.
    https://github.com/gorhill/uBl...

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:uBlock by Velocifero · · Score: 1

      Safari, also.

  55. Text free browsing by HairyNevus · · Score: 1

    Text free browsing for when reading people's stupid comments becomes just too much.

    --
    You were critically hit for no damage. The bruise will look nice, and maybe the scars will make good party talk.
  56. LastPass and RetroGmail by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 1

    retro removes the nasty compose window

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
  57. aardvark / hack the web by swell · · Score: 1

    These allow you to edit a web page. Remove the ads, the fluff, anything you don't like. Or simply select the text that interests you and poke CMD-i to isolate it. Print, copy the text, or make a PDF if you want to keep it. Aardvark is legacy, may not work on your newer Firefox. Hack seems to work well.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  58. Give me less. by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    By far the most useful extensions are the ones that reduce my "browsing experience"
    Things which prevent things from being pushed at me (NoScript, AdBlock)
    Things which allow me watch videos at my pace and choice of quality instead of "streaming". (youtube downloader)
    And in general things which reduce the number of features I'm forced to contend with.

  59. Nuke Anything by ortholattice · · Score: 1

    For Firefox, I use Nuke Anything Enhanced 1.1 when overlays, ads, etc. on broken or poorly designed pages obscure the text I'm trying to read. Basically you right-click over the object and select "Remove this object" (and there is an undo). At first I installed it out of curiosity, but I'm surprised how often it is useful.

  60. Here is what I use in my SeaMonkeys in Windows... by antdude · · Score: 1

    Last updated: Wed Feb 18 2015 11:28:06 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
    User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32.1

    Extensions (enabled: 7)
    * Adblock Plus 2.6.7 (http://adblockplus.org/en/)
    * British English Dictionary 1.19.1 (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/british-english-dictionary/?src=api)
    * ColorfulTabs 18.1 (http://www.binaryturf.com/free-software/colorfultabs-for-firefox/)
    * DOM Inspector 2.0.15 (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/inspector/)
    * IE View 1.5.6 (http://ieview.roub.net/)
    * PrefBar 6.5.0 (http://prefbar.tuxfamily.org/)
    * WOT 20131030 (http://www.mywot.com/)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  61. Bonjour browser by davecotter · · Score: 1

    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-... I'm surprised this isn't built in to the browser itself.

  62. Er.... by plcurechax · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you could ask the browser extension sites themselves....

    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...

    https://chrome.google.com/webs...

    Most have highlighted the most common for slashdot users are:

    • obnoxious advertisement mitigation (aka "ad blocking")
    • privacy & security e.g. Do-Not-Track Plus, various (super-)cookie deleters,, cross-site scripting managements/restriction (NoScript, Request-Policy), HTTPS-Everywhere,
    • some advanced users / web developers e.g. Firebug, vimperator, TableTools2
    • content access / VPN tools (Hola)
  63. Cloud to Butt by rokstar · · Score: 2

    I find cloud to butt very useful in terms of maintaining my sanity, YMMV. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...

  64. My best Firefox extensions by bblakeny · · Score: 1

    Lastpass - probably the biggest thing most users can do to improve security, use a secure password manager.
    NoScript - another critical security tool
    Adblock Plus
    BetterPrivacy
    WOT - web of trust, gives quick security info on any website
    Lazarus - really useful ability to recover input, prevent losing a post
    CompactMenu - add menu to the navigation toolbar, hide menu bar
    TooManyTabs - great for saving lots of tabs
    Places Context Menu - allows bookmarks to be sorted by visit count

  65. Greaseonkey and NoBennett script by Iarwain+Ben-adar · · Score: 1

    Maybe someone already posted this, but I can't see it! https://gist.github.com/Mini-G...

  66. Scripting hosts! My must-have by EdZep · · Score: 1

    Greasemonkey for Firefox
    Tampermonkey for Chrome

    I've spent a lot of time writing and maintaining scripts to add beauty and functionality to the Hollywood Stock Exchange, http://hsx.com/. Check 'em out if you play, or start to play: http://ez-edzep.tripod.com/

  67. Can't live without these by rxtc · · Score: 1

    Firefox: LastPass, NoScript, Better Privacy, uBlock, Disconnect, Pocket, HTTPS Everywhere, RES, Free Memory, Configuration Mania, DownThemAll, Extended Statusbar, Fire Gestures, MEGA, OmniBar

  68. Special request by operagost · · Score: 1

    I'd like whatever plugin it is that keeps Firefox from ballooning to 1+ GB of RAM if I have a few tabs open.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  69. Here's a few by Trogre · · Score: 2

    Here's what I use at present. I consider all of the highly useful.

    Status-4-evar because no desktop browser should be without a status bar
    Tab Mix Plus for its excellent session handling and handling of unread tabs.
    Tree Style Tab for its correct placement of tabs on widescreen monitors (on the left, not at the top) and its absolutely wonderful hierarchical tree of tabs.
    One of the many YouTube video downloaders
    Flashblock for obvious reasons
    Adblock, for when ads get to invasive.
    Disable CTRL-Q Shortcut because 'q' is too close to 'w' on my keyboard.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  70. Fix a senseless waste of screen real estate by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    About 2 years ago Mozilla decided to always use some of your precious screen real estate to show a row of tabs, even when that's a total waste because you only have one tab open. The fix:
    "Hide Tab Bar With One Tab"
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  71. Safari Extensions by mattack2 · · Score: 1

    My favorite Safari extensions..
    OpenAtEnd -- makes new tabs go to the far right
    Right Exit -- closing a tab moves you to the next tab on the right, not the left
    ClickToPlugin -- the superset of ClickToFlash

  72. How about none? by chaoskitty · · Score: 1

    How about no extra browser extensions? Or even an extension or two which limits the other browser extensions?

    Browser plugins have the WORST security surface. If you want to do something, do it outside of a browser so that you're not giving every and any site you visit the opportunity to exploit something you only run once in a great while.

    Netflix no longer requires Silverlight, so we can remove that. Once Hulu moves away from the crapstorm which is Adobe Flash, it'll be more realistic to completely trash that forever (I will have a party when that happens!) Don't get me started on Adobe Acrobat and PDFs in browsers... Java - shit - what a MESS! Who the hell wants to run Java in a browser anyway? There has to be a better way. Keep around an old Windows machine if you want to feel dirty by trolling around for the latest disease and let Java die.

    It'd be nice if something like ClickToPlugin were available for all the browsers (it's for Safari), but I learned from The Register how to make plugins click-to-play on Firefox and Chrome. See the bottom of this article:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

  73. Firefox is important, partly because of add-ons. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Informative

    Firefox is extraordinarily important to all of humanity. Without the open-source Firefox, our communication with each other with web pages would be severely limited by abusive managers of huge companies. For example, Microsoft's Internet Explorer version 6 had an enormous number of quirks; web designers wasted huge amounts of time dealing with that.

    Mozilla Foundation has exhibited a combination of excellent and poor management, in my opinion.

    Add-ons are very useful. One of the most important aspects of Firefox is the huge number of Add-ons available. Here are some I've found necessary:

    Adblock Edge, ads were yesterday! Attacks sometimes pose as ads. Stop tracking. Advertisers of run annoying ads.

    BetterPrivacy, "Super-Cookie Safeguard", eliminate sneaky tracking.

    Classic Theme Restorer, required because of Mozilla Foundation's bad management of GUIs.

    Close tabs to the left, title says it all. What? Why is that necessary? Why does Firefox have only "Close tabs to the right"?

    Cookies Manager+, needed because of poor management of Slashdot by the parent company, Dice Holdings.

    FEBE, backup your Firefox data. Restores only to the same profile. Use MozBackup to restore to a different profile, such as when you move to the Pale Moon 64-bit version of Firefox to get away from Mozilla Foundation bad management.

    Ghostery, protect your privacy.

    iMacros for Firefox, help jump through log-on hoops.

    Mozilla Archive Format, save everything you see displayed on a web page.

    NoScript, protect against attacks, stop tracking.

    Nuke Anything, Enhanced, remove areas of a web page.

    Restart-less Restart, Firefox frequently crashes when there are many windows and tabs, because of the memory-hogging bug that Mozilla Foundation hasn't fixed in 9 years.

    Session Manager, when Firefox crashes, go back to the Windows and tabs you had before the crash.

    Session Manager Export Tool, export windows and tabs of a Firefox session to HTML.

    Snap Links Plus, opens multiple links inside a selected area.

    SQLite Manager, manage any SQLite database.

    Tab Mix Plus, fix Firefox's insufficient GUI design.

  74. Google has become an abusive company. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    In a Windows command-line window, type:
    services.msc

    Right-click on Google services, choose "Properties", then choose "Disable" as the "Startup type".

    Google installs at least 3 system services:

    Google Update Service (gupdate), "C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Update\GoogleUpdate.exe" /svc

    Google Update Service (gupdatem), "C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Update\GoogleUpdate.exe" /medsvc

    Google Updater Service (gusvc), "C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Common\Google Updater\GoogleUpdaterService.exe"

  75. Titi username by fgouget · · Score: 1
    The report says "Titi is a French diminutive for Thiery, or a colloquial term for a small person".

    Well first it's Thierry with two 'r's, but I've never seen titi being used as a diminutive for it, though that's because nobody would stand to it being used in public. Then there's the titi parisien but I've never seen titi refering to a small person.

    But all this misses the point. Just like an uninspired English-speaking programmer will call his variable 'foo' and then 'bar' if he needs a second one, a French programmer will call his variable 'toto' (from the classic Toto jokes) and then 'titi' if he needs a second one (and then 'tata' but normally by the time he reaches tutu he realizes he really needs to straighten up ;-) ).

    So what this really tells us is that this developer has a collegue whose username is 'toto'.

    1. Re:Titi username by fgouget · · Score: 1

      Sorry, wrong story.

  76. Re:I asked AdBlock's creator those questions... ap by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

    Uhh...

    A) You look like a crazy spammer with your insane formatting, massive hyperbole, and numerous comments that seem to be frothing at the mouth. It's no wonder Palant stopped responding to you.

    B) I never suggested people should use AdBlock. Quite the contrary, in fact, since I already pointed out that it wasn't particularly efficient and suggested that people should use an alternative to it. I know that reading my single sentence is asking a lot of you, but you might be advised to read it a bit more carefully next time before you make multiple comments, each of which has dozens of lines of inapplicable text that look to have been written by a madman.

    C) Custom hosts files complement browser addons, rather than replacing them. I use both uBlock and a custom hosts file, and I'd encourage others to do so as well, since each handles various things better or differently than the other. For instance, hosts are more efficient and can prevent the ad server from ever getting my request, which addons sometimes can't do, but it can't remove the element from the page where the ad would have showed, whereas an addon can. Hosts files are also a bit more hands-on in keeping up-to-date than addons, but they have the benefit of working across any browser or Internet service on your computer, whereas addons are easier to keep up-to-date, but only work in the browser where they are installed.

    TL;DR: Read more carefully, use both, and stop posting tirades. We'll all be happier, you included.

  77. Quickdrag by TheOneFreeman · · Score: 1

    Firefox has this add-on called Quickdrag (there are some clones around but this one is clean, small and simple) with a very basic premise but it's one of the greatest speed boosters I've ever had the pleasure of using: drag and drop any piece of text and it automatically launches a search on the search engine enabled in the search bar. If it's a link, it'll open a new tab with the link as URL. It's so simple to use but is a huge time saver. A few things to bear in mind however: since it hasn't been updated in quite a long time one of its functions which saves a dragged and dropped image (not being captured by javascript that is) doesn't work and you must manually disable adware using the last option in its option menu.

  78. Auto Text Expander by IsoQuantic · · Score: 1

    If you use Chrome, the Auto Text Expander extension will become a must have. Create some text trigger shortcut, enter it, and it expands to any sort of text you want to enter into a textual field that you find yourself entering often.

    --
    -- I fear explanations explanatory of things explained.
  79. My faves by BSDchik · · Score: 1

    Def. HTTPS Everywhere. getcocoon, Firebug, Live HTTP Headers, and Better Privacy. I generally do not use more than 5 extensions.

  80. Re:I asked AdBlock's creator those questions... ap by OffTheWallSoccer · · Score: 1

    TL;DR: Read more carefully, use both, and stop posting tirades. We'll all be happier, you included.

    Nicely measured response! Usually such responses fall on deaf ears and only invite further flame from that guy, but it looks like you (to use that guy's lingo) destroyed him. :-)