Slashdot Mirror


'Babar' Malware Attributed To France

sarahnaomi writes: The NSA, GCHQ, and their allies in the Five Eyes are not the only government agencies using malware for surveillance. French intelligence is almost certainly hacking its targets too — and now security researchers believe they have proof. On Wednesday, the researchers will reveal new details about a powerful piece of malware known as "Babar," which is capable of eavesdropping on online conversations held via Skype, MSN and Yahoo messenger, as well as logging keystrokes and monitoring which websites an infected user has visited. The researchers are publishing two separate but complementary reports that analyze samples of the malware, and all but confirm that France's spying agency the General Directorate for External Security (DGSE) was responsible for its creation.

37 of 65 comments (clear)

  1. A nice piece of... by Arkh89 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The first ever malware to work only 35 hours a week...

    1. Re:A nice piece of... by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is anyone going to talk about the elephant in the room?

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:A nice piece of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I forget, which elephant is that?

    3. Re:A nice piece of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why do people seem to view short work weeks as a bad thing ?
      I understand that dedicating a long time to work is sometimes necessary, but being proud of it ? That's stupid. It's like admitting one's own inefficiency.

      BTW, France doesn't have the shortest work week. In fact, 35 hours is typical for an European country.

    4. Re:A nice piece of... by king+neckbeard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hard work is basically a religion to large swaths of the US.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    5. Re:A nice piece of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It did create jobs, multiple studies show it. So yes, real economy works that way.

    6. Re:A nice piece of... by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

      The malware also doesn't work at all during August, and will randomly go on strike.

      It also immediately surrenders to the first AV program to find it.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    7. Re:A nice piece of... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      Somehow malware named Babar doesn't geel so threatening.

      NSA: Note to self - call our next drop Curious George

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    8. Re:A nice piece of... by greatpatton · · Score: 4, Informative

      Low productivity? Per hour French productivity is 25$, US one is 24.6$. It's clear that French productivity is bad.... US debt is 102% of GDP compare to France 93% (reference FT: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/28c0...).

    9. Re:A nice piece of... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Would that elephant be that while those agencies were all so busy working on those hacks, they were doing nothing at all to protect us from them. In fact it would have gone against their own personal, individual benefit and future career prospects to protect us from those security failings ie they were actively working against the interests of the own state and citizens in order to attack other states and their citizens. The stupidity continues as does the failure of various justice departments to prosecute because yes, when those tools turn around and attack their own citizens they have committed a computer crime and should be prosecuted.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    10. Re:A nice piece of... by quenda · · Score: 2

      You mean sophisticated malware in the hands of a known terrorist organisation?

      Two of the DGSE killers were caught and imprisoned in New Zealand, but the French government threatened crippling EU trade sanctions if they were not released.

    11. Re:A nice piece of... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Presumably they named it thus because it never forgets.

  2. Re:"all but confirm" English lesson by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    Basically, we have very strong reasons to believe this is the case, but we don't have enough evidence yet to say conclusively that they are responsible. The researchers are likely saying that they clearly did it, but backing off just a bit to not be at risk of getting sued.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  3. Re:"all but confirm" English lesson by everett · · Score: 1

    They present a lot of information that will lead to that conclusion, but do not themselves state that the conclusion is fact.

    --
    Sig withheld to protect the innocent.
  4. Re:"all but confirm" English lesson by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    "All but confirm" means "everything up to, but not actually, confirming".

    So the "all but" includes "strongly suggests", "gives reason to believe", and similar suggestive (but non-confirming) phrases.

    In other words: "We can't confirm (prove) the assertion, but we strongly believe in the assertion."

    "Everything short of" is a similar phrase.

    --
    -kgj
  5. Could have been worse by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Funny

    It could have been the Asterix malware. That shit doesn't just spy on you, it beats the crap out of of you - and then has a nice feast to celebrate!

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  6. Lord forbid.... by nrasch · · Score: 1

    Lord forbid a security researcher share list of user name and passwords, or a journalist post a link to a database dump, or a college student download a large number of academic journal articles through MIT's computer network.... These evil computer hackers need to be put away forever to protect the children, moral people everywhere, and our pristine government that can do no wrong. The death penalty probably won't be too good for them!

    However, should the government want to hack us, destroy our privacy, intercept and tamper with postal packages, harm the computing environment in general by embedding back doors and exploits into software/hardware, etc. by all means this is perfectly OK. Hell, we should be grateful they are doing this for us poor pleebs since we can't think for ourselves. I mean this is the government; they know what's best for us.

    So kill the "hackers" for doing something that doesn't even remotely approach the level of invasiveness described by this article and others, but let the government do anything they like in the name of "security" and "safety." Or hell, maybe even because they just feel like it. Who are we to question our betters?

    This crap makes me sick.

    1. Re:Lord forbid.... by chipschap · · Score: 1

      These evil computer hackers need to be put away forever to protect the children

      I believe they are also responsible for global warming.

  7. Re:Isn't slashdot's reaction interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There must be a commercial break on Fox News. You better get back, you might miss something.

  8. Isn't the name alone proof enough? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I mean, who else is going to craft malware named after french speaking elephant.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Isn't the name alone proof enough? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      I mean, who else is going to craft malware named after french speaking elephant.

      Ivory Coast (Côte d'Ivoire) seems to have more tie-ins...

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:Isn't the name alone proof enough? by havana9 · · Score: 1

      I mean, who else is going to craft malware named after french speaking elephant.

      Next malware, derived from a japanese one wil be called Albator.

  9. International protest month by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    Everyone get online and start talking about terrorism to flood the snoopers.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:International protest month by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

      Protest?

      Great idea, then the NSA can justify a bigger black budget in a country that has been floating on credit since it went bankrupt in 1971 as a direct result of what the mob did in the late 50's/early 60's beyond turning national security into a fucking joke. It is completely understandable as to why they did what they did to Snowden, and not in a good way. The more people they push towards the edge, the more that will start playing it like they have nothing left to lose. Think Bosnia.

  10. Meaningful Oversight by Etherwalk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This proves that all the whining about the NSA has little to do with actual worries (as if anyone in the government actually cares about their porn viewing habits), and more to do with overwrought anti-Americanism.

    No, it doesn't.

    We are more concerned about the NSA doing it because it has a bigger budget and because, for a lot of slashdotters, it's our government that's doing it. It's still a subject for humor, but nevertheless a real social policy concern. I've met a lot of great guys who work in law enforcement whom I would generally trust not to abuse the powers created by massive surveillance, but the problem arises when too much trust is given and there isn't enough oversight of how it is used. As it is, the public is not given any believable claim to even the existence of meaningful oversight.

    That means bad actors within the system can use it to spy on people they know, on their own ex-wives, for example. And while they might get severely disciplined if they're caught, the public hasn't been told how likely it is that they're caught.

    It also means the system can be used to blackmail VIPs, power-brokers, reporters, and legislators. While most of the people involved would not use it for that, it only takes one or two people to be willing to do that and a lack of *perfect* oversight and reporting for a system like this to utterly threaten and destroy any notion of representative government.

    Imagine you have a database of every Congressman's phone calls, or even every third or fourth phone call that happens to be to someone within a three-hop warrant of a terrorist.

  11. Re:Isn't slashdot's reaction interesting... by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    I think it's more to do with the inevitability of the French=Surrender Monkeys meme. Personally, I think this makes it all the more evidence that this is a government practice that we need to eliminate. Those behind this malware are criminals and we should see them as such.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  12. Re:"all but confirm" English lesson by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    And there is no fucking oversight.

    Aue contraire - the Israelis would disagree with you on this particular matter.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  13. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The 'Bieber' malware has been attributed to Canada, which is capable of infecting all news websites with inane celebrity gossip.

  14. Re:"all but confirm" English lesson by nobuddy · · Score: 1

    In a sealed room with only one way in or out, you have a corpse, you have a person standing over the corpse covered in blood and holding the murder weapon. A camera outside shows that both entered the room together and no one else has been in to or out of the room.
    However, you did not see them drive the knife in to the person causing death. You have all but confirmed this is the killer.

  15. Re:Isn't slashdot's reaction interesting... by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As an American, I have the right, duty and obligation to complain about the NSA's illegal bullshit because they're (ostensibly) claiming to represent me as a citizen, while acting against my interests as a citizen. France, on the other hand, is a sovereign foreign nation, in which I have no standing to complain.

    The spying is bad no matter who's doing it, but it's the French citizens' job to fix France's spying, not mine, just as it's American citizens' job to fix the USA's spying, not theirs.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  16. Beyond flimsy by aepervius · · Score: 2

    The "evidence" are : 1) babar & titi the names (babar from a children book published in 1931... and has pretty much international readership and has shows in canada) Or pretty damn simply a fan of soccer.

    2) MSIE misspelled as MSI which anybody could have done

    That is quiiiite flimsy. I hope they have more.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  17. Guess they aren't after hackers by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

    I figure they are going after most users which will exclude hackers since they all use Linux or some form of to do their work.

  18. This malware invades Windows desktop machines by lippydude · · Score: 1

    This malware invades Windows desktop machines and aims at exfiltrating almost anything of value: it steals data from instant messengers, softphones, browsers and office applications .. A target machine is infected possibly through a drive-by or malicious e-mail attachments. Babar is deployed through a malware dropper, which installs the malware ...

  19. Re:Isn't slashdot's reaction interesting... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    They surrendered in WW2 and still can't live it down, but aside from that the meme isn't accurate. Their special forces are usually considered some of the best in the world, and the french resistance certainly managed to make the Nazi occupiers lives difficult.

    The English still remember kicking French arse at Agincourt, of course. Even if it was six hundred years ago. We didn't just win - we won by such a margin as to give them humiliation that will last a thousand years.

  20. MSN Messenger by DJRikki · · Score: 1

    As long as my ICQ chats aren't vulnerable Im happy

  21. Re:Isn't slashdot's reaction interesting... by fgouget · · Score: 1

    This proves that all the whining about the NSA has little to do with actual worries (as if anyone in the government actually cares about their porn viewing habits), and more to do with overwrought anti-Americanism.

    Quite the opposite. It proves that the anti-French sentiment is so strong in the US and UK that it drowns any rational discussion.

  22. Titi username by fgouget · · Score: 1

    The report says "Titi is a French diminutive for Thiery, or a colloquial term for a small person".

    Well first it's Thierry with two 'r's, but I've never seen titi being used as a diminutive for it, though that's because nobody would stand to it being used in public. Then there's the titi parisien but I've never seen titi referring to a small person.

    But all this misses the point. Just like an uninspired English-speaking programmer will call his variable 'foo' and then 'bar' if he needs a second one, a French programmer will call his variable 'toto' (from the classic Toto jokes) and then 'titi' if he needs a second one (and then 'tata' but normally by the time he reaches tutu he realizes he really needs to straighten up ;-) ).

    So what this really tells us is that this developer has a collegue whose username is 'toto'.