Slashdot Mirror


Ten Lies T-Mobile Told Me About My Data Plan

reifman (786887) writes "Last June, my post "Yes, You Can Spend $750 in International Data Roaming in One Minute on AT&T" was slashdotted and this led to T-Mobile CEO John Legere tweeting 'how crappy @ATT is' and welcoming me to the fold. Unfortunately, now it's TMobile that's having trouble tracking data; it seems to be related to the rollout of their new DataStash promotion. Just like AT&T, they're blaming the customer. Here are the ten lies T-Mobile told me about my data usage today."

237 comments

  1. heres another lie. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Informative

    Your data plan doesnt take into account advertisements which are basically subsidized at your expense. It doesnt count the silent data collection performed by most apps, or silent updates performed in the background. root your phone, install http://fdroid.org/ and download adaway to null-route advertising servers and reclaim some of your data plan

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yep, that will sure work fine on an iPhone.

    2. Re: heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine.... I will then!

    3. Re:heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure it does take into account advertisements and data downloaded & uploaded.

    4. Re:heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why use an iPhone in the first place?

    5. Re:heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because it has an Apple logo on it, duh! How else do you expect me to fit in with the cool kids?

    6. Re:heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have the $30/month unlimited data (first 5GB at 4G speeds) prepaid service with T-Mobile and it's great. Never had a problem with it.

      I think this whiner just has apps that are using data without his knowledge. The fact that he's using an iPhone is a pretty good indication that he's not technically savvy, so he would be easily suckered into downloading all sorts of crap and malware.

    7. Re:heres another lie. by LordLimecat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Your data plan doesnt take into account advertisements which are basically subsidized at your expense. It doesnt count the silent data collection performed by most apps, or silent updates performed in the background.

      Those updates offer you the option to defer them till Wifi.

      More to the point, most geeks object vocally when carriers try to look at what you're doing. T-Mobile doesnt. They provide a pipe. What sites you visit, how big their ads are, and what apps you download-- none of that is their problem. If you use their pipe, they count the data.

      Its worth noting though that they dont charge overages, you just lose LTE access when you cross your limit. Oh no, cry me a river. Maybe you want to look at deferring those updates till wifi, or quit watching youtube over LTE, or (gasp) upgrade your plan. T-Mobile's plan is so much better than any other carrier, its laughable, and here you are complaining that theyre not DPI'ing you to detect what the ads are.

    8. Re: heres another lie. by Karlt1 · · Score: 2

      Because on an iPhone, I can disable apps on a one by one basis from using cellular data, from using data in the background and don't have to worry about dozens of popular apps loading ads on my home screen.

    9. Re:heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but the cool kids don't use crapple any more...

    10. Re: heres another lie. by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

      You can do the same on Android as well. It's not hard to restrict background data for offending software.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    11. Re: heres another lie. by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      What setting? I have an Nexus 7 running stock Android.

    12. Re: heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are lots of apps on Google Play that will let you do this. Unlike iOS, you have a choice in which one you want to use.

    13. Re: heres another lie. by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Settings>Data Usage>(Insert Offending App Here)>Restrict Background Data checkbox. Tick that box on, and the app won't be able to use cellular data.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    14. Re:heres another lie. by chihowa · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just in case it wasn't clear from the post above, you lose LTE/3G but still retain EDGE access. Email, light web browsing, maps, and the like still work fine on EDGE, just more slowly. I've rarely gone over, but only dropping my speed when I do is just about the best reaction to an overage that I've seen.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    15. Re:heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Others have said this in the thread already, but this is NOT informative for an iPhone user; if nimbius had bothered to look at the first link in the summary s/he'd have known this.

    16. Re:heres another lie. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work on kitkat, even rooted.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    17. Re:heres another lie. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... derp, I was thinking of adblock. No idea if adaway works.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    18. Re:heres another lie. by arth1 · · Score: 0

      The T-Mobile data plan is nice, except for not getting high speeds most places outside big cities and their suburbia.

      But they nickel and dime you for everything else. Even with their top plan where everything was supposedly included, a friend sent me text messages from his T-Mobile service, and I never got them. It turned out that for the privilege of sending or receiving SMS to or from other countries, you have to pay T-Mobile $10 extra per month, despite it not costing them anything extra, and even when the people in the other end are also on T-Mobile. Pure money grabbing.

    19. Re:heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You do not get dropped to EDGE access. You are still on 3G, but throttled to about 128 kb.

      This is fast enough for most activity except streaming video. It works for Facetime audio only calls and streaming iHeart radio.

    20. Re:heres another lie. by fred911 · · Score: 1

      "More to the point, most geeks object vocally when carriers try to look at what you're doing. T-Mobile doesnt. They provide a pipe."

        T-mobile's DNS server feeds you to THEIR custom add ridden 404 when there's no resolution, and by default ignores any DNS server you have set. I can't remember the exact details, but it takes a little brute force to make the device use the DNS you want. And if I remember correctly, it must be done with each and every address lease.

      That's hardly "not looking at what I'm doing"..

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    21. Re: heres another lie. by jsveiga · · Score: 1

      Annoyingly, restricting background data isn't available when you select the "Android OS" "app", so the only way to really stop a (non rooted) Android phone to silently eat up your data plan is to completely disable cellular data. Whenever you need it, enable it - knowing that while you are using it, "Android OS" is doing its thing too.
      I miss how Symbian respected the fact that you were the one paying for the service, no hacking required.

    22. Re:heres another lie. by LordLimecat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But they nickel and dime you for everything else. Even with their top plan where everything was supposedly included, a friend sent me text messages from his T-Mobile service, and I never got them. It turned out that for the privilege of sending or receiving SMS to or from other countries, you have to pay T-Mobile $10 extra per month, despite it not costing them anything extra, and even when the people in the other end are also on T-Mobile. Pure money grabbing.

      I am not aware of this being true. I recently travelled through 3 countries in the mid east and asia, and had web and texting for free. The only thing that would have cost money was voice. This required no special plan or notification to T-Mobile.

    23. Re:heres another lie. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Worth looking into (and I intend to), but thats different than what OP suggests: that T-Mobile should somehow differentiate between normal ads and apps, and "actual data". This involves DPI.

    24. Re:heres another lie. by arth1 · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand - read again.
      That you can use your own mobile phone in foreign countries, also for texting, isn't the issue. I never said it was.

      However, you cannot text or receive texts from someone who has a non-American/Canadian phone number (even if on T-Mobile) without paying $10 per month extra for T-Mobile turning off the blocking.

    25. Re:heres another lie. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I have one of those $30 T-mobile plans too, and none of the nickel-and-dime stuff you mention matters because I just use Google Voice / Hangouts VoIP so everything, including phone calls and SMS, counts as data.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    26. Re: heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cool devs still do, though, because hardly anyone is making money on the Android markets.

    27. Re: heres another lie. by jc42 · · Score: 2

      The cool devs still do, though, because hardly anyone is making money on the Android markets.

      Heh. I have a number of friends (acquaintances, colleagues, etc.) who are giving up on IOS, after numerous cases of their apps rejected by Apple, and then in many cases duplicated a month or two later by an Apple app. This tends to lead to a certain amount of what we might call cynicism about the whole process.

      I like to remind them (or tell them, if they haven't read their history) that this has always been the story in "cottage industry". You do the work on your own time, and the employer then decides whether what you did deserves pay (and often keeps the rejects rather than returning them to to the worker). Historically, people working in cottage industries have been rather poor, since the employers control the market and take most of the income for their own coffers. In the modern software industry, the employers also normally claim any "intellectual property" that you develop, which of course includes everything that you create if you're a software developer.

      But it's nothing new; it's how "unregulated" industries have always worked. Maybe it'll be fun (in a historian sense) to stick around and see how it all plays out in the long run.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    28. Re: heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah because machine features should be something you have to go to a third party for.

    29. Re: heres another lie. by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

      Fascinating! Why has the Flashlight app used 6.5MB of data? I've now turned that off. Thanks!

    30. Re: heres another lie. by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      There is such a thing as a cool dev? (speaking as a dev)

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    31. Re: heres another lie. by nullchar · · Score: 1

      Try Mobiwol, the no root firewall, which works as a local VPN so it routes all your traffic through the VPN running on the phone itself, thus giving you ability to allow/deny individual apps from network access (including background vs foreground).

    32. Re: heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have shitty colleagues.

    33. Re: heres another lie. by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the cool devs in the top 10 list. iOS developers are all getting rich on that $4k average app revenue. Wow.

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/co...

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    34. Re: heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are homophobic !

    35. Re:heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure I understand either. How are you using a foreign (i.e., non-American or non-Canadian) phone number on T-Mobile? All the other carriers would charge international texting fees just to text a foreign number anyway...

    36. Re:heres another lie. by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Wish I had points to mod this up. That said, I've long suspected that T-Mobile's plans are generous because their coverage is so weak. It sucked when I used VoiceStream and I haven't seen anything since to make me believe it's changed.

    37. Re:heres another lie. by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      Having an iPhone is a status symbol showing people that you can afford to throw away money. 'Ten dollar bills? I wipe my ass on them and flush them down the toilet, that's why I have an iPhone..'

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
    38. Re:heres another lie. by macpacheco · · Score: 1

      Like carriers, phone makers are all evil. At least Android is less evil.
      But in general phones today are optimized for usage in wifi. They are perfectly willing to gobble GBs of data very quickly, even for things you don't want to (specially when not home). Its the same thing with my chromebook. It auto downloads chrome os updates from the internet any time it finds them, even if I'm on a crappy GSM signal trying to get my e-mail in a hurry. And there's nowhere to block it easily.
      All phones need to have an intermediate model between airplane mode and normal data mode. A slow data mode. Block everything that isn't essential.
      But then we run into another fact, if we knew everything out phone os and phone apps do at all times, there would be LOTS of things we wouldn't want it to do EVER, but the phone marker and apps makers want it.
      In that game, Android is far from perfect, but its wayy better than iPhone.

    39. Re:heres another lie. by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I understand either. How are you using a foreign (i.e., non-American or non-Canadian) phone number on T-Mobile?

      Texting or receiving SMSes from my friends in Europe?
      T-Mobile blocks that, even on their "all included" plans, and even though it doesn't cost them a dime.

    40. Re: heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't true anymore, unless you pay cash for your phone up front. On the Next plan you only have to pay the tax up front & then enjoy using your phone for free for the next 18 months to two years (except for the cost of data plan & whatever services you want on the phone). There's a discount of $25/mo on the plan for being on Next, which means if the cost of your Next phone is $25/mo, you're only paying for the data. (Example iPhone 6, 64gb storage, 10gb/mo shared data plan with rollover). Really not too shabby & doesn't break the bank. iOS=expensive is a myth. (Except if you want to pay cash, unlock the phone, root it, or whatever else your sense of freedom requires.)

    41. Re: heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in Bizarro world

    42. Re:heres another lie. by IHateEverybody · · Score: 1

      Maybe there is a similar app available in Cydia for Jailbroken iPhones?

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
    43. Re: heres another lie. by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      You have named one of the big risks of iOS development. In general, Apple is reluctant to approve apps that compete with their own apps; they allow competing apps from major tech companies because it would be too unpopular not to, but a smaller developer is at their mercy. One of my nightmare scenarios would be to come up with a new idea, spend a year developing an iOS app, and then have Apple reject it because they were secretly working on the same thing.

      Android does not have that particular risk. Competing with an app from Google might be difficult but at least the company will let you try; they have no prohibition on apps that compete with their own. Another key difference is that sideloading is possible; even if the Google Play store won't carry your app, you can offer it through other channels. Gambling apps and apps with sexually explicit content can be sold for Android though not through Google's store. Reputable third party stores will still ban the other kinds of content that Google prohibits, such as spyware, Trojan horses, and other kinds of malware.

    44. Re: heres another lie. by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      You are probably using an ad-supported flashlight app. The ads are using the data.

    45. Re:heres another lie. by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      It's just as well that they don't drop you to EDGE access, since they have discontinued it or choked it down to minuscule amounts of spectrum in many major cities.

    46. Re: heres another lie. by pepty · · Score: 1

      It does seem to work, but since all of your data traffic is now through mobiwol, aren't you trusting the owners of the app with all of your data traffic?

    47. Re:heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually streaming audio does not count towards your allowance on T-Mobile. This applies to practically every streaming audio service due to their "Music Freedom".

    48. Re: heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it should be because I can choose who I want to trust instead of being forced to trust a single company like Apple forces their users to.

      I suppose you think that Android should disallow third party launchers too.

    49. Re: heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people pay upfront for their phones and then choose their provider. Only in the USA are people stupid enough to rent their phones.

    50. Re:heres another lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On an iPhone you can just set up a hosts file.

      *ducks*

    51. Re: heres another lie. by nullchar · · Score: 1

      Aren't you trusting the "owner" of your linux binaries, including your favorite browser, with all of your data traffic?

      Your data doesn't pass through a remove VPN. Think of it like tunneling through a loopback device.

  2. Here's one by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    T-Mobile Visual Voicemail used to work over the internets. But now you have to be on cellular data to use it. When T-Mobile made the change, they cited "security" as their reason. But even AT&T's VVM app works on unfriendly networks. Android includes ipsec, so if they really cared about security they could encrypt the VVM communications, but they don't. What they care about is money, and for prepaid customers, checking voicemail costs $1-3 depending on plan, since you pay for days on which you use your device.

    The lie is that it has to be this way, which is what they will tell you if you complain. But it didn't used to be this way...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Here's one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That certainly makes sense: you are such a shithead that no one would want to send you voice mail anyway.

    2. Re:Here's one by wolrahnaes · · Score: 3, Informative

      Two words for you:

      Google Voice

      Not only does it give you great voicemail but you get the option of a second number on which you can filter and forward calls to your heart's content, plus free texting, and you can access it all from your computer, tablet, whatever. For the anti-Google crowd there are a number of other providers offering similar services, any VoIP provider is technically capable of doing it.

      Carrier voicemail is a pile of crap across the board, I haven't used it since I got a smartphone.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    3. Re:Here's one by fustakrakich · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If you don't like the lies, don't but a 'smart' phone. These things happen because the customers make it successful.

      Slightly rephrasing the motto of capitalism: *Maximize the abuse the market will bear.* This is what the reality reflects. Creating a buyers (consumer friendly) market will take a little effort, but it can be done.

      Don't cry about this shit. Get your money back and buy a $30 Nokia, problem solved.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:Here's one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Voice, for when you don't care about the quality of your calls.

    5. Re:Here's one by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Don't cry about this shit. Get your money back and buy a $30 Nokia, problem solved.

      So just to be clear, the solution to the problem that visual voicemail doesn't work over the internet is to get a phone which doesn't have visual voicemail, and which always period the end full stop requires me to use the cellular network to check voicemail? Uh no

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Here's one by jader3rd · · Score: 2

      T-Mobile Visual Voicemail used to work over the internets. But now you have to be on cellular data to use it.

      It still works over Wi-Fi if you have Wi-Fi calling enabled.

    7. Re:Here's one by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      Really you all can do what you want. But to keep buying this stuff while complaining about about it sounds very much like the damn people who won't vote their favorite corrupt politician out of office and then piss and moan on how the 'system is rigged'. Sorry, but all I can do is laugh.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    8. Re:Here's one by chihowa · · Score: 1

      The one practical use I've found for voicemail is screening unfamiliar numbers. If I don't recognize the number and they don't leave a message, it was almost certainly not a call that was important or intended for me.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    9. Re:Here's one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for prepaid customers, checking voicemail costs $1-3 depending on plan, since you pay for days on which you use your device.

      Well, unless you were already using your phone that day anyway and only if you're on a "pay per day" plan. I'm on a prepaid plan and checking my voicemail just uses my regular monthly voice minutes, doesn't cost anything extra.

    10. Re:Here's one by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      I use Google Voice, and the voicemail feature is still useful, but they've already cut off 3rd party app usage which really gutted the use cases it was good for. I still use it, but I can't recommend it, because it might get shut off at any time. There is just no implied future to the service; it exists as long as it exists, because it doesn't make any money for them. Sad but true.

      I would instead recommend that users who can afford it use a commercial IP telephony service with similar features.

      You can indeed access the voice mail from any device, but you can't use the phone features except through google apps.

    11. Re:Here's one by pepty · · Score: 1

      If you are on T-mobile (I have been for about 16 months) calls will frequently go to your voicemail because there is no service available for your phone when you are: in a large building, on a subway, in a suburban area, in an urban area ...

    12. Re:Here's one by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      So just to be clear, the solution to the problem that visual voicemail doesn't work over the internet is to get a phone which doesn't have visual voicemail,

      What the fuck is visual voicemail? Isn't that a contradiction in terms?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  3. Article bad web page design by MrL0G1C · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Light grey text on a white background FFS, how can anyone think this is a good idea?

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    1. Re:Article bad web page design by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You've been modded off topic, and I probably will be, too, for agreeing with your post.

      When I tried to read his list of lies, I gave up after the first sentence. I'm 62 years old and I don't see as well as I did back when I was Superman. A curse and a pox on web sites that use such low contrasting schemes. The article may have been interesting, but I'll never know what he intended to say because I simply can't read it without getting eyestrain and a massive headache.

      Even increasing the font size in my browser can't compensate for low contrast. Using "Select All" makes for text that is a bit easier to read, but grows tiresome after a while because all the images have been selected, too.

    2. Re:Article bad web page design by cruff · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A curse and a pox on web sites that use such low contrasting schemes. The article may have been interesting, but I'll never know what he intended to say because I simply can't read it without getting eyestrain and a massive headache.

      I agree 150%! I will often close a web site nearly immediately if it has piss poor graphical design. By the way, have you investigated if your browser has the option to turn off page styles? In Firefox selecting the View/Page Style/No Style menu option will turn off the crappy graphic decisions made by the web site author, if you really need to view the site.

    3. Re:Article bad web page design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      > In Firefox selecting the View/Page Style/No Style menu option will turn off the crappy graphic decisions made by the web site author

      I find that killing the style sheet usually just trades bad color scheme for bad layout.

      I use the no color add-on which puts a button on the toolbar to toggle a page between color and black-and-white without affecting the layout.

    4. Re:Article bad web page design by cruff · · Score: 1

      I use the no color add-on which puts a button on the toolbar to toggle a page between color and black-and-white without affecting the layout.

      Even better! I've been annoyed by the lack of layout when disabling page styles. I've added it to my extensions, looks like it will be very useful.

    5. Re:Article bad web page design by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

      userstyles.org has tons of css styles you can apply to websites to help with readability (either through usercontent.css, stylish, etc...)

      if you can't find a generic black on green (or such), let me know and I'll make up something for you

    6. Re:Article bad web page design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use the no color add-on which puts a button on the toolbar to toggle a page between color and black-and-white without affecting the layout. Even better! I've been annoyed by the lack of layout when disabling page styles. I've added it to my extensions, looks like it will be very useful.

      Another one to try is prefbar. Single click toggle for color, cookies, Javascript, Flash, drop-down control of user-agent, and more.

    7. Re:Article bad web page design by chihowa · · Score: 1

      If this is something that happens often, look into applying a user CSS like someone else mentioned or adjusting the font options in your browser. Most browsers will let you override the website's fonts with your own (though the OS default browsers like IE and Safari tend to put those options in the system settings).

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    8. Re:Article bad web page design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ctrl+A

    9. Re:Article bad web page design by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      My eyes are somehow still great, but I agree entirely!

      My advice, unless you're a professional web designer, don't even set colors for text and text backgrounds. The users defaults are nearly guaranteed to be readable. Same applies to fonts.

    10. Re:Article bad web page design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a contrast plugin for chrome, If your over 50 don't surf without it.

      And yeah, a warm place in hell for those morons who think pastel fonts on shaded backgrouds are a good thing. A proper designer would learn about contrast, and color scintillation in school.

    11. Re: Article bad web page design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 2015, use reader mode, or use a browser that does have it and stop whining.

    12. Re:Article bad web page design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be interested in reading about contrast ratios. The text is #888 and the background is #fff, and it gives a contrast ratio of 3,54:1 according to this calculator [1].

      The recommendation is to have a ratio of at least 4,5:1, although personally (and I'm young and have no vision impairments) I'd say the text needs to be at least as dark as #555 to work out. (contrast ratio 7,46:1)

    13. Re:Article bad web page design by Megane · · Score: 1

      I call it the "85/85" fad. It started about 10 years or so ago, where normal body text was set via CSS to 85% gray and 85% of your configured font size. Presumably it was to make headlines look bigger instead of, you know, just increasing the size of headline text? I'm sure it must even be a default in new Wordpress configurations. And suddenly everybody is doing that crap. But I took a quick look at the linked site, and it's more like 75/75. And it even has a tag cloud, something that I hear was first invented as a joke.

      And a quick protip: your browser probably has a way to turn off CSS rendering. In Mozilla Seamonkey it's View -> Use Style -> None. Of course excessive formatting and hidden fields and pop-up menus and facebutt logins turn into a jumble all over the page, and this one seems to be worse than others. The most interesting is how every word in headline text is in there twice. "The The Ten Ten Lies Lies..."

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    14. Re:Article bad web page design by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      I don't know why anyone would think it's a good idea, but it's become so common among bloggers that there's actually a Firefox extension that does nothing but turn grey text into black text.

    15. Re:Article bad web page design by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      I compared the colour in an editor, it is actually just under 50% black! That view option destroyed all page layout in a ghastly manner. I use color toggle Firefox plugin occasionally on the worst pages.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    16. Re: Article bad web page design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 2015, if your site is so poorly designed that it can't keep a viewer interested for at least a few seconds then you're going to lose viewers.

  4. Screw this clickbait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Ten Lies T-Mobile Told Me About My Data Plan

    Here are the ten lies they told me during the course of the more than hour long call:

    1. The first two reps told me that there was never a bug affecting data usage. Eventually, the supervisor acknowledged that yes there had been (as I’d been told in January) but that it had been fixed.

    2. They said maybe it was my fault – that I just didn’t realize how much data the iPhone 6 uses despite having had it on my account since September 2014 with four consecutive months under 3 GB.

    3. They told me my phone had slowed because I’d already used my 3 GB plan data and 3.5GB of my 10 GB data stash (which activated at the end of January). But their website showed this was clearly not the case.

    What the T-Mobile Website Showed

    Perhaps he mistakenly was combining the plan data and data stash usage (3.45 GB) but he continued to repeat that it was 3.5 GB from my data stash. Still later, he told me I had used up 6.5 GB of my data stash.

    4. Then, they told me their website usage data was up to 3 days behind. When I told them that the website was already including most all of the data from today (2/20), my call was at noon, he said it was up to 24 hrs behind.
    feb220

    Data usage on 2/20 from T-Mobile Website during the call

    Here’s what it says tonight:

    5. Then, they told me that my entire data stash was gone because when I switched plans from Unlimited to 3 GB, I lost my data stash – ignoring my pleas that their January account tech had made the plan switch to fix the bug with billing in January.

    6. They told me there might be a problem with my iPhone which they would help me troubleshoot. I told him I was hesitant to begin troubleshooting with someone who was quoting me statistics that didn’t reflect the reality shown on their website.

    7. Then, the supervisor told me that perhaps I didn’t need to worry about this because the plan would reset tomorrow on the 21st because it’s a short month, not on the 26th as it always has. Here’s what the website showed:

    What The T-Mobile Website Showed

    8. Then, the supervisor told me my phone has only been using my DataStash (not my plan data). Again, the website:

    9. They told me that my phone has been using up my entire DataStash over the past several months. The DataStash didn’t begin until late January.

    10. And perhaps the last lie came at the beginning of the call, a voice said the call would be recorded for quality assurance. The jury’s still out on that one.

    1. Re:Screw this clickbait by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Turn off mobile data and only use wifi. If everybody does that, you might see some changes. But as long as people keep buying these damn things faster than they can be made, nobody should complain about the success of the business model.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Screw this clickbait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      4. Then, they told me their website usage data was up to 3 days behind. When I told them that the website was already including most all of the data from today (2/20), my call was at noon, he said it was up to 24 hrs behind.
      feb220

      I work with this data every day. It really *could* be up to 72 hours. Under particular conditions. If your phone does not hang up with GSM/CDMA you will not get the data usage until 24 hours have passed. At which point your carrier will hang up the phone and your phone will call right back in 1 second later. The backend processing could take up to another 48 hours. LTE may not hang up at all for up to one month but *may* send in a usage interim summary every 3 days.

      The reality is more like 1-2 hours. I have seen as fast as 20 seconds. I have one customer on a system that does 40k connections a day (bug in their firmware).

      The data it summed up on AAA connection end. Which is where the 'usage' comes from. Billing does not track what you did. Just how much. Inside the core routers they do track where you go (as they have to route it). Front of house does not look at that data at all. In fact they can not access it. It would probably take ages to find someone to actually dig out the logs and then get permission to do so. As they are NOT supposed to do it (even though it is pretty easy to do)...

    3. Re:Screw this clickbait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just sounds like a troubleshooting process from a user's perspective. Add it to the top ten list of "meh"s for this weekend.

    4. Re:Screw this clickbait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this summary, it provides an easy reference.

      1) Could be a lie, probably just misinformed underlings
      2) Not a lie, proposed a source of the problem
      3) Maybe not a lie, website could be out of date
      4) Not a lie, providing information on potential delay getting information to the website
      5) Almost certainly just an error by someone not knowing how to dig into the history of the system properly
      6) Not a lie, an offer to help troubleshoot
      7) Is this a website lie or was the supervisor wrong?
      8) Trusting the website again
      9) Misreading records again
      10) Not a lie, his poor attitude does not mean the call wasn't recorded

      So if the ones that were outright not lies are discarded, we have only 6 possible "Lies", and most of them look like just duplicates caused by the website disagreeing with T-Mobile's live data.

      I guess "Four Lies T-Mobile Told Me About My Data Plan" just wouldn't have had the same ring to it, though.

    5. Re:Screw this clickbait by sjames · · Score: 2

      Why shouldn't people complain about fraud? It is, after all, supposedly illegal.

    6. Re:Screw this clickbait by BronsCon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let's take it a bit farther, shall we? Assume all 10 are actually lies, they're not about the data plan, at all; they're about the data usage. I'm willing to bet that T-Mobile was completely up-front honest about the data plan, as their marketing materials are all pretty clearly written and it would take a complete idiot of a sales rep and a complete idiot of a customer to get those details wrong.

      How about "Four Misinterpretations of My T-Mobile Data Usage, Repeated to Look Like Ten"?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    7. Re:Screw this clickbait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me add that roaming might be significant slower on showing up, it all depends on the roaming partner.
      If author of the article knew how accounting is being done he would not make write something like:
      "It also remains a bit frustrating to me that the carriers are allowed to bill you for data amounts without actually having to show you the URL endpoints related to each data packet. They say it’s for privacy – but perhaps it would be more clear for them to say, “We don’t think we can secure that data well enough to keep it private.”
      An MNO/MVNO just simply doesn't have traces of all its customers to this details.

    8. Re:Screw this clickbait by KevReedUK · · Score: 1

      Actually, I guess the last one was more of a tongue-in-cheek dig. The quote stated that calls are being recorded for "quality assurance". Would I be wildly misinterpreting his intent if I were to guess he was saying that this is a lie because of his perception of a low quality of service from those he spoke to over the three contacts (i.e. the "quality" wasn't "assured", in spite of the recording of calls)?

      --
      Just my $0.03 (At current exchange rates, my £0.02 is worth more than your $0.02)
  5. Maybe you deserve it ? by obarthelemy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd do much worse than that to someone who writes in light gray over white. You owe me a couple of corneas.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re: Maybe you deserve it ? by TellarHK · · Score: 0

      First step? Don't call them clueless right off the bat.

    2. Re: Maybe you deserve it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know. It's redundant.

    3. Re: Maybe you deserve it ? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      He didn't call Apple users clueless, he called this Apple user clueless. Judging by the unreadable website, the fact that the lies were apparent misunderstandings, and were about data usage, not a data plan, I'd say he was spot on, and I don't think he made that assessment right off the bat, either; though it does appear that you made your assumption in that manner, without taking into account the evidence of cluelessness.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    4. Re: Maybe you deserve it ? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Obviously he should burn in hell for his color choices. There is no redemption possible. However, that doesn't mean that he was wrong about T-Mobile's lies. Most of the lies were indeed lies. The only misunderstanding I see is #10; he misunderstood what they mean by "quality."

    5. Re: Maybe you deserve it ? by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      You've clearly never been a T-Mobile customer using a new feature as they're in the process of rolling it out. Or, really, any other company doing the same. There's is a huge difference between a lie and a misunderstanding, in that a lie requires intent. It's fairly common for training, and even support systems, not to roll out until after the feature (backwards, in my opinion, but they do it so they can roll the features out faster); I would be willing to wager that this is exactly what happened here, having experienced the same thing when T-Mobile first rolled out Simple Choice, again when they rolled out Jump!, and yet again when they rolled out the CellSpot routers. I pay for unlimited LTE, so DataStash has no bearing on my account, but I would imagine they're rolling it out the same way they've rolled out every other change in the 2 years I've been with them.

      They're really not a good provider for anyone who doesn't have at least a little patience. They're used to being the smallest of the "big" players and their customer base has bee growing very quickly since they started Simple Choice, but it seems they're still using the same release procedures that caused headaches during that initial growth period. Should they change? I don't know, it seems to be working for them, honestly. Would many of us be less frustrated with them if they rolled out the support systems and training before the features? Maybe, maybe not; we might be more annoyed that the features take longer to roll out. And there's the rub.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    6. Re: Maybe you deserve it ? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Re-read what I said, but this time assume I know what all the words mean, I chose them on purpose, I'm over 30, and I know at least a little bit about what I'm talking about.

      T-Mobile isn't Comcast, but did you know that my state has to fine Comcast multiple times per year over persistent "mistakes" in how they organize their bill? You'd think after decades of saying, "no, that's a lie, no, that is intentionally unclear, no that is a lie, etc." that they would learn to write a clear bill. And indeed, it becomes obvious eventually that none of these are mistakes or misunderstandings.

      When the person on the phone doesn't know the answer, but they claim to know it and guess, and are wrong, that isn't a misunderstanding. That is somebody telling a lie. That they know the answer is the lie.

      If you look at the actual accusations and the screen shots, there are numerous examples where to defend them the best you can do is say it is a smaller lie than it appears to be. But none of that makes it into misunderstandings. They didn't misunderstand, they lied about various things while at the same time also misunderstanding the (incorrect) numbers on the screen.

      That you're a fan of their service overall tells you nothing at all about if it was a lie or a misunderstanding. And if you were close to my age, you'd have seen these same things from so many companies for so long, you'd realize that the workers in that call center have been dealing with these issues for decades. The guy on the phone may be new, but his boss isn't. They do actually know what they are doing. And if you also read business news, you'd know that their industry media tells them to do these things. It is a known way of doing business, to keep the customer in the dark and feed them shit. They have formal analysis that tells them it makes them more money than providing good service. That is another reason it is not believable when they pretend to accidentally do exactly the things their industry rags tell them will make them more money. They're experts in their field, and they're doing things the way they intended. And that's why so many companies are doing it exactly the same way.

    7. Re: Maybe you deserve it ? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      'm over 30, and I know at least a little bit about what I'm talking about.

      ME TOO!!!!!! YAAAAAAAAAAAY! I guess, then, the question is who should get off whose lawn, right? If that's the best qualification you've got, I think we're done here, but I'm bored at the moment, so I'll continue anyway.

      If you look at the actual accusations and the screen shots...

      ...you see one user's claims and the user portal. What you don't see is what the user actually said to T-Mobile, or the customer service portal, both of which likely differ from what we (barely, thanks to the color scheme) see on that page.

      That you're a fan of their service overall tells...

      ...me that you're making assumptions. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt not because I'm a fan[1], but because my past experience with them indicates that the rep is, in fact, most likely seeing what he says he's seeing in the support portal; that information likely does disagree with the customer portal. One portal is probably displaying incorrect information. Maybe both are. And it'll get fixed just like each of the examples in my previous post. If I'm wrong, I'll gladly eat those words, but something tells me we'll never know how this story ends; I full do not expect this random blogger to update the story if T-Mobile fixes the issue, but I won't be surprised if they complain again next month if it's not fixed yet.

      And if you were close to my age...

      When did you graduate, friend?

      [1]: I'm not, I could leave at any moment as I have no obligation to them, no ETF, phones paid for, etc... I don't because there's not a better option for me at the moment. I left AT&T at the drop of a hat, after 13 years of excellent service (a hint as to my age, I left AT&T 2 years ago, almost to the day; please check your assumptions at the door), when a better option came along and I'll do the same with T-Mobile if it happens again.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    8. Re: Maybe you deserve it ? by BronsCon · · Score: 1
      My bad, forgot to address this bit:

      When the person on the phone doesn't know the answer, but they claim to know it and guess, and are wrong, that isn't a misunderstanding. That is somebody telling a lie. That they know the answer is the lie.

      Actually, I did address it, I just didn't mention it at the time. I'll just copy and paste the approriate portion of my other reply:

      the rep is, in fact, most likely seeing what he says he's seeing in the support portal; that information likely does disagree with the customer portal. One portal is probably displaying incorrect information. Maybe both are.

      Now, I color myself quite the cynic, and my friends tend to agree, but your level of cynicism makes even me blush. I'm not even going to touch the comparison to Comcast because, you're right, T-Mobile's not Comcast. You'd think after 30+ years you'd have learned how to form a reasonable argument.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    9. Re: Maybe you deserve it ? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If you don't even know whose lawn this is, you're new to slashdot. Who did you buy your account from? Some kid, from the number.

    10. Re: Maybe you deserve it ? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Seriously? That's the best you've got? Your UID (the actual name for what re referred to as "the number") might be lower, but you're definitely on my lawn.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    11. Re: Maybe you deserve it ? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Actually, I did address it, I just didn't mention it at the time.

      LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

      O M F G that is a good one. Quit while you're behind lolol

      I'm not "cynical" at all, actually. That just adds to the humor. That they lie to you is the standard practice of their industry. Have you ever even seen the training materials? It isn't cynical it is top-shelf mainstream. Their job is not be moral and ethical, it is feed whatever crap their charts say will make users shut up. In many cases, well above half the callers will actually believe the crap, believe it was all their own fault, agree to faulty charges, agree to keep paying faulty charges every month. A lot of customers will agree to that just based on posturing.

      It would be nice to live in a world where honestly was just assumed in customer service, but that isn't the world we live in. I always give people the benefit of the doubt; generally I'm accused of "supporting" all sorts of things that I don't support, just because I defend things when the accusations don't match the evidence. But here, the evidence actually matches standard practices that are taught in the industry.

      It was a proper argument. I said, Woobles are to Blargs as Foobars are to Blaz. You obviously disagree, but you instead of trying to substantiate your own opinion, you made a faulty claim that my opinion isn't even able to be considered. I say you simply failed to understand it.

    12. Re: Maybe you deserve it ? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Your UID (the actual name for what re referred to as "the number") might be lower, but you're definitely on my lawn.

      Proven, you really did just show up. Give grandma her laptop back before she grounds you.

    13. Re: Maybe you deserve it ? by BronsCon · · Score: 1
      Perhaps I disagree because my wife has worked in a call center and I have her experience to back up my position? Or, perhaps, because I'm not a complete dick to phone reps, so they actually take the time to help me, rather than saying whatever to get me off the phone. I'm sure both of those color my experience, which in turn, paints my opinion. When I have phone reps double and triple check that they provided satisfactory service and ask me, repeatedly (in an attempt to delay having to deal with someone like you on their next call), if there is anything else they can help me with, that gives a distinct impression that they're not just saying whatever to get me off the phone. I also tend not to get conflicting stories from subsequent reps, don't have to argue to get billing errors corrected, and don't tend to get jerked around as often as some people I know; likely all benefits of not treating the reps like shit.

      As for your insistence that the reps were lying to this blogger, what do you have to say about this quote?

      The images he shows prove that there are serious bugs in the T-Mobile data tracking. Different places in their software makes different claims about the usage, and their own support workers can't even make enough sense of it to read the usage off the screen accurately.

      My take in it is that you're admitting that the information the rep has may be incorrect. That doesn't make the rep a liar when he recites that information, it makes the information incorrect. Or, maybe, the information available to the customer via the customer portal is incorrect; the poster you were replying to wanted to see the iPhone's data usage report, likely, to verify that. It's not entirely unreasonable, when you suspect an inaccuracy in one data source, to refer to one or more other sources to confirm.

      you made a faulty claim that my opinion isn't even able to be considered

      I did no such thing. You're stating your opinion, that all call center reps lie, as fact, by trying to tell me that it's an industry-wide standard, that they're trained to lie, as though that's a fact. You can't have it both ways; it can't be both your opinion and a fact. You can either provide reference material for your claim, which would make it a fact, or let it rest as an opinion and quit trying to frame it as anything else. As it is, until right here, where you refer to it as opinion, you've been framing it as fact and have, thus far, been able to back it up; and I do refuse to consider "facts" without proof, especially when I have plenty of experience telling me there's no factual content contained within.

      You're as entitled to your opinion as I am, I simply prefer to have my own.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    14. Re: Maybe you deserve it ? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Really? You want to get in a pissing contest over UIDs? If I hadn't lurked for 9 years before signing up, I'd have a sub-1000 UID, but you and I know that size doesn't matter nearly as much as how you use it; and I'm somewhat unsatisfied with your performance. (Also, is it just me, or has this branch of our discussion devolved into us attempting to out-troll each other? If so, don't get me wrong, I'm down for that; just remember who took the first swing before you get all butthurt.)

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  6. Free international data roaming has worked well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but the free international data roaming has worked pretty well for me in Hong Kong, Singapore, France, Switzerland, Bulgaria, Belgium, UK, Austria and Canada. The 128kbps serve me perfectly fine for SIP calling (google voice + callcentric reverse), google voice via handouts lately, an EU mobile carrier that also has sip service, and for google maps, browsing and just about anything. I have about 3GB in roaming data I haven't paid an extra cent for in the past 8 months. Yes, I pay a bit high montly, but still less than ATT.

    Admittedly I don't text so I don't care about that part - I use iMessage, Viber and WeChat

    1. Re:Free international data roaming has worked well by saihung · · Score: 1

      Free roaming data in Belgium, France, Holland, Germany - it's been amazing. People can reach me, WhatsApp works, and I don't even have to think about buying a local sim card. I'm not overly concerned about DataStash. The unlimited international T-Mobile 2G roaming was reason enough for me to switch.

  7. Slow news day by Chris453 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I also have T-Mobile, use my phone all the time for web browsing/apps, never use wifi, and my data usage for the last 30 days? 1.24 GB. Maybe you are holding your iphone wrong.

    1. Re:Slow news day by cptdondo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. I've had T-Mobile for years, use them internationally all over the world, and never once have I run into this, except in China when my nexus 4 decided to download a new version of Android, over and over and over.

      This whole article translates to WAAAAHHHH!!!! I'm a whiner and I didn't get my way so I'm going to throw my mashed peas at the wall!

      Grow up and quit whining. Sometimes you run out of your data allotment and all that happens is that TMobile throttles you down to a slower speed so you can't stream porn anymore.

      Much ado about absolutely nothing.

    2. Re:Slow news day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly. I've had T-Mobile for years, use them internationally all over the world, and never once have I run into this, except in China when my nexus 4 decided to download a new version of Android, over and over and over.

      This whole article translates to WAAAAHHHH!!!! I'm a whiner and I didn't get my way so I'm going to throw my mashed peas at the wall!

      Grow up and quit whining. Sometimes you run out of your data allotment and all that happens is that TMobile throttles you down to a slower speed so you can't stream porn anymore.

      Much ado about absolutely nothing.

      Ditto, however with such whining capabilities this sounds like a mileniall in which case its his parent's phone plan and he might get his allowance shortened =/

    3. Re: Slow news day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The beautiful part about t-mobile is no extra costs for going over. It's literally just annoying for him.

  8. googling on iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I search on my iPad and go to a site, more and more of them have their own apps. Why in the World would I install an app to look at their content?

    There is no reason other than having an advertising platform on my device.

    It's just ridiculous. Apps and the web have become this medium to just get us to look at apps with mostly shitty content.

    1. Re:googling on iPad by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      It's just ridiculous.

      Well, you can only blame the market for not rejecting this stuff at the onset. People should send their phones back and demand they fix it or give their money back. It's going to take a lot of people, but hey, that's the nature of the beast. Otherwise, if they can't be bothered, there is no reason to blame the venders. Personally it's not an issue. Without unlimited mobile data, I turn it off and use wifi.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re: googling on iPad by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I've found that the apps often preform netter caching, but often miss features.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re: googling on iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful that the "better caching" you see isn't actually pre-fetching, where the app downloads several of the next few links in the background so that if you click one, it loads much faster. Problem is, that counts against your data even if you never do click those links.

    4. Re:googling on iPad by sabri · · Score: 1

      When I search on my iPad and go to a site, more and more of them have their own apps. Why in the World would I install an app to look at their content?

      CrappySite App requires the following permissions:

      - your address
      - all your friends addresses
      - all information in your contact book
      - the name and SSN of all your children
      - all your credit card details
      - the date you last went to the dentist

      Get it?

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    5. Re: googling on iPad by jc42 · · Score: 2

      Be careful that the "better caching" you see isn't actually pre-fetching, where the app downloads several of the next few links in the background so that if you click one, it loads much faster. Problem is, that counts against your data even if you never do click those links.

      I've done a number of demos of what a site can do to you with pre-fetching. I make a page that shows viewers a few pictures, but also has "hidden" links that you don't see to other images, videos, etc. There are several ways of including such links without the browser actually showing them, which I won't waste time with here. I also include at least one link that's visible as an ordinarily link pointing to a large file that takes a while to download. After talking a while about other parts of the page, I tell the person to click on that link -- and observe that the content shows instantly, although it's obvious large and should take a while to download. This gets across the concept of pre-loading, and why it's useful. But I can also explain that it means stuff you never looked at may have also been downloaded.

      Then I tell them to take a look at the source (perhaps teaching them how to do that), and point out the hidden links. I invite them to imagine what the pre-loading could have "installed" in their browser's cached without their knowledge. For instance, they could now be on their local government's terrorist or drug dealer or religious heretic or kiddie-porn lists because of what was just pre-loaded, and the evidence is sitting in their cache. I invite them to discover just what those links actually pre-loaded. And no, I won't tell them how to do that, any more than an actual hostile web site will.

      Sometimes I grin and tell them that if they haven't done anything wrong, they have nothing to hide, right? ;-)

      Actually, the hidden links generally point to rather innocent stuff, like tourism photos or wikipedia pages or cute cat videos, but they don't know that unless they figure out how to see the hidden content. The most useful is probably a page that simply explains that I could have linked to anything on the Web, and I'll leave it to their imagination what could be in their cache as a result.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    6. Re:googling on iPad by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      People should send their phones back and demand they fix it or give their money back

      I wish! We could bring bad actors to heel very, very quickly if we were willing to boycott. But somehow, a whole bunch of people never get word, and a whole bunch more can't be bothered to participate even if they agree. It's really amazing how much people tolerate. Lots still buy gasoline from BP, still let Bank of America invent new charges to drain their bank accounts, still suffer Comcast's dreadful cable TV service. What does it take to drive those customers away?

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    7. Re:googling on iPad by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      ...a whole bunch more can't be bothered to participate even if they agree...

      And this is why nobody should be blaming the cell phone companies. Everybody needs to redirect their energies to the source of the problem.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  9. Data-counting and accountability by KreAture · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What bugs me with these data-counting plans is how they never have to prove to anyone that their numbers correlate to the real world.
    If you sell apples by the lb you have to use a set of scales approved by the government. You have to show that it has been checked and correctly installed.
    So, why does this not apply to bits and bytes?

    So many users see odd calculations and billings from so many companies that one should think it was obvious by now this isn't fair...

    1. Re:Data-counting and accountability by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      People install so many apps, and give so many privileges to the apps. So many of them call home and upload connected data, also down load updates. So much of the data usage happens behind the scenes. In android at least there are settings to allow an app to connect to the internet only on wifi. These apps bitch moan and scream, "the app may not work right it it cant connect to the net all the time". But silence them anyway to get some handle on data usage. But even the apps you allow might suddenly download stuff or upload stuff. Some are more honest and nice than the others.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    2. Re:Data-counting and accountability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, why this not apply to water and energy supply? and to gas? Or do you think that because everyone and their dog dream they are experts in IT, that suddenly the rules change?

    3. Re:Data-counting and accountability by free779 · · Score: 0

      Or updates to existing apps can change data patterns. Remember when FB added the autoplay video feature that would start streaming video even when you were on a mobile network? A lot of people got screwed by that...

      Regardless, i don't think T-Mobile should be responsible at all for what's on your phone. It's your responsibility to watch what your phone is doing, and if you can't do that, just upgrade your plan. It's not like T-Mobile isn't reasonable about it either, you still have a data connection.

    4. Re:Data-counting and accountability by KreAture · · Score: 1

      If you bill by the gallon, it DOES apply to water and the meter has to be approved.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W... (UK example.)

      If you bill by the kWh it also applis to power and again your meter has to be approved.
      If you bill by the cubic meter volume of gas it also applies to Gas and again has to be approved.
      https://www.gov.uk/uk-national... (UK example.)

      You see, you cannot sell a measured quantity without having some sort of proof that you are measuring an acceptable accuracy of said quantity. If there is an error, its benefit must also be on the side of the customer. Delivering a bit too much is allowed, but too little is not.

    5. Re:Data-counting and accountability by KreAture · · Score: 1

      Just to add:
      http://stopthecap.com/2014/06/...
      This is exactly what I mean...

    6. Re:Data-counting and accountability by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If I'm buying apples and they didn't have a certified scale, I can tell because there will be a sign that says, "sold by volume, all weights are approximate." This is one reason why roadside fruit stands often sell by the bag, basket, box, or flat, instead of by the pound.

      When I buy or sell electricity or water, the meters have to be approved for that use by the state Public Utility Commission.

      As an IT "expert" I have to inform you that it is you that are defending the rules being different in IT. The person you responded to is proposing that the rules be the same. It seems a straightforwards idea, and I can certify for you that no IT expertise is implicated by this idea.

    7. Re:Data-counting and accountability by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So many users see odd calculations and billings from so many companies that one should think it was obvious by now this isn't fair...

      This takes me back to the days of early usage based billing of internet in Australia. You basically had to go to online forums and do research to find out if your carrier was counting just downloads, downloads and uploads, counting traffic to servers they host, counting traffic to certain sites or only accessed certain ways (I'm looking at you mobile providers who said Facebook is free but only if you use it via the browser), or whether peer-to-peer traffic is counted within their network.

      It was effectively a lucky dip and you had to guess whether one company's 5GB plan was actually more generous than another's 10GB plan.

    8. Re:Data-counting and accountability by Tom · · Score: 1

      So, why does this not apply to bits and bytes?

      Uh, because they are different categories of things?

      I know what you want to say, but you need to think about it more in depth before you throw it out here. The better analogy would be a service- or craftsman that you pay by the hour. You can watch at the clock yourself, but if you don't, three weeks after the fact the only proof available will be his notes about when he started and when he stopped.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    9. Re:Data-counting and accountability by KreAture · · Score: 2

      I believe you are wrong here.
      In your example you can actually watch the person, you can even videotape (or digitally ofcoruce) him/her.
      But, in the case of your phone or pc, the supplier/isp refuses to tell us exactly how they count and what they count.

      For example, phone service providers will often charge differently for a picture message than for data traffic. In which case they may or may not deduct the snooped message sent via IP from your data total and add a fixed number to the bill instead. On the other hand they may later switch to a unlimited plan where they now only bill for the data, but will not clarify, or even know themselves, if they are now still deducting the picture messages.

      In comcast case they used an independent party to verify their billing and then went out and stated that they felt it was really good and only -0.76% to +0.36% wrong. The problem there is any error in such sales shall be on the side of the consumer, so they would have to offset all their billing by +0.76% to be in the clear from a regulatory perspective.

  10. Slashdotted != going viral by damn_registrars · · Score: 0

    The article says that his previous post went viral. This is not nearly the same as being slashdotted - at least, not any more. We don't have enough users on slashdot any more to bring down even a hobbyist website, let alone a hosted blog. How many years has it been since slashdot users last successfully slashdotted a website (at least, one that wasn't hosted on an intentionally low-powered system?)?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  11. BREAKING: User expects phone drone to know stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    In a bizarre show of ignorance, a user of a mobile phone network operator expects to get problems resolved by talking to customer service representatives, and acts surprised when this creates more problems. It is unclear whether said user is a time traveler from better times past or has just been living under a rock.

  12. Let's get technical by arth1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    From TFA:

    It also remains a bit frustrating to me that the carriers are allowed to bill you for data amounts without actually having to show you the URL endpoints related to each data packet.

    Um, wot? First of all the endpoints are not URLs - presumably he doesn't know the difference between socket addresses and URLs.

    But to present a list of each data packet? I don't think this guy has any idea at all of how networking works. Even if his phone operated with an X.25 1500 byte packet size and everything he sent or received were even multiples of that, a 3 GB usage would then mean at least two million lines listing endpoints. In real life usage, much more.

    1. Re:Let's get technical by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

      And if they gave him a list of everything he downloaded for his billing then he would complain about how they were tracking his every move online and invading his privacy.

    2. Re:Let's get technical by dcooper_db9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No problem for the carrier. They'd just charge him for downloading the report.

      --
      I do not block ads. I do block third party scripts.
    3. Re:Let's get technical by free779 · · Score: 1

      I doubt very much that it is even a 'URL endpoint', since it is probably a new or updated app downloading content in the background. It's his responsibility to figure out what app is doing that, not T-Mobile's.

  13. Weights and Measures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Practically everyone who meters bandwidth does trickery for profit.

    Ever use a CDN? They think 1 megabit = 1000 kilobits and double/triple charge if they have to transfer the bits internally within their CDN!

    For companies that meter on bandwidth we need weights and measures laws for bandwith -- just like water, gas, electricity utilities have as well as gas
    stations, grocery stores, etc.

    What we have in data metering right now is as if there were no rules as to whether a gas station used Queen Ann gallons, Winchester gallons, Imperial gallons or
    whether they round to the nearest gallon -- that is if they even bother to meter and just guess based on the size of the car and impund your vehicle if you refuse to pay.

    If we did not have weights and measures laws there would be no sensible way to compare gas stations, there would be a great incentive for every gas station to employ ever greater measures of trickery all resulting in every trip to the gas station would being a rip-off -- like we have in bandwidth metering today.

    1. Re:Weights and Measures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only is 1 Megabit equal to 1000 kilobit by the definition of mega and kilo, this (and not the powers of 2 interpretations) is also the customary way of specifying bandwidth.

  14. Whine, whine, whine by Art+Challenor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WTF. We have one person's bad experience with a phone carrier as "news". If we're just going to start publishing individual complaints the entire site will be filled with rants about Verizon and AT&T, that's without even starting on Comcast and Time Warner.

    1. Re:Whine, whine, whine by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If we're just going to start publishing individual complaints the entire site will be filled with rants about Verizon and AT&amp

      Wait you mean we don't do that already?

    2. Re:Whine, whine, whine by Art+Challenor · · Score: 1

      Well yes, but usually only in the comments. Making a story out of each one would be a little overwhelming.

  15. Funny, my experience has been completely different by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find this article funny because my experience with T-Mobile has been completely different.

    I'll admit, I only consider them good because the competition is so bad (and I've had a number of cell carriers), but so far I'm very happy with them:

    • I get an unlimited data plan for the cost of a limited data plan on Verizon
    • I get LTE in all major metro areas, and it's FAST
    • Unlimited really seems to be unlimited. I abuse it (streaming movies for instance) and haven't once seen a slow down. And I check periodically with a speed test app
    • Due to a large european network, roaming abroad can be cheaper than other carriers
    • While other carriers like Verizon and AT&T have a lot of bad press for tracking of users / selling users data, there's been none from T-Mobile. A cynical person might say this is because they're just better at it, but I feel it's important to reward companies who do the right thing.

    The only complaint I have is they disable the personal hotspot on my phone after 5 GB of usage each month. After that I have to pay.

    In short: they might not have everything I want, but they are awesome compared to everyone else out there.

  16. T-Mobile are bastards by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

    When I switched my 4 lines to AT&T, T-Mobile continued to bill me for 3 months on the numbers they no longer had.

    Now, of course, the only people who will talk to me about it are collection company zombies who know nothing beyond their script.

    --


    "Lame" - Galaxar
    1. Re: T-Mobile are bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick Question: did you port all of the numbers out and then keep getting billed once the numbers are ported, or did you just go to your new carrier without porting numbers and hope that t-mobile guessed that you left? The most that t-mobile would charge would be until the end of the billing cycle that you ported out on because porting out cancels the line of service and the account would automatically end at the end of the cycle with no active lines.

    2. Re: T-Mobile are bastards by sjames · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't matter. If AT&T is routing calls to those numbers, it can only be because they were ported. T-mobile can't NOT know about that.

    3. Re: T-Mobile are bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The routing system must know that, but the billing system needs some type of update. If they weren't ported-out, then it might have never been notified.

    4. Re: T-Mobile are bastards by sjames · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they need to see a neurologist about that. If they want to be treated as a single legal entity, I don't see why they shouldn't act like one.

      Surely it would be worth looking into before accusing someone of being a bum.

    5. Re: T-Mobile are bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If any carrier ports a number out, part of the process is that they let the old carrier know that the line is being taken from them. At that point, the line of service ends at the end of the billing cycle (at latest) and if it was every line, the account automatically closes. No upgrades required.

      Now if the user got "clever" and just forwarded his calls to his brand new numbers given by a new carrier and never calls to cancel, how was anyone to know to stop charging him? I used to work for a major carrier and that second one happened all the time. either take your numbers with you or let the carrier know. Beats the alternative.

  17. Already Solved Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This problem was solved a long time ago with utilities, gas stations and gricery stores; we just need to apply
    the same techniques to those who meter bandwidth:

    http://zatznotfunny.com/2009-05/heres-why-you-want-bandwidth-caps/

  18. phone data usage by pikine · · Score: 2

    I need to see a screenshot of his iPhone data usage tracking before I could take him seriously. Even if it is true that he never changed his usage pattern, he might have mistakenly installed an app that ate up his quota. If so, I think he owes T-Mobile a public apology.

    --
    I once had a signature.
    1. Re:phone data usage by free779 · · Score: 0

      Android will show you in what apps are using your data - can't imagine that iOS doesn't have the same feature.

    2. Re: phone data usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prepare to be surprised. Hell, it took until iOS 8 just to get a battery usage monitor.

    3. Re:phone data usage by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I need to see a screenshot of his iPhone data usage tracking before I could take him seriously. Even if it is true that he never changed his usage pattern, he might have mistakenly installed an app that ate up his quota.

      The images he shows prove that there are serious bugs in the T-Mobile data tracking. Different places in their software makes different claims about the usage, and their own support workers can't even make enough sense of it to read the usage off the screen accurately.

      Since I'm not him, I really don't care what his usage was. But it harms everybody in the market, including people who use a different service, when a service is being dishonest. It distorts the market. And they clearly have bugs, and honestly utilities seem to have a practice of having this exact type of "bug" even where in most industries the tracking numbers still add up, even when there is a bug. It isn't like the software double-counted something. Different parts of their software are reporting different numbers, that is very suspicious. It would be exceptionally poor engineering to actually be taking different measurements of the same thing, and using one in the phone, and the other on the website. It is the same billing account, the same billed service, so they should be tracking it in one place, storing and transmitting that data, and then displaying it in multiple places. When there is conflicting data that doesn't line up with any of the numbers, it seems really more likely that they wrote it to appear buggy, than that there is a natural bug. If it was off by a digit, or doubled, or a day behind, or something, that would make sense. But the numbers in the screenshots just don't seem to be any obvious mistake. And only some of their software seems to have this wrong idea of the numbers. Why would those parts even be trying to calculate a number, and not just displaying the same number from the database?

    4. Re:phone data usage by pikine · · Score: 1

      He can say anything about what the picture means as he wants. Some of his figures are pretty, but I'm pretty sure it's not a figure produced by the T-Mobile website. I'm a T-Mobile user, and their site only produces the usage over three billing cycles, Dec, Jan and Feb. I think his "Data Usage By Month Ending" figure is fabricated. The pink color is slightly different from the website's magenta color. Who is the dishonest one here?

      I think you have problem understanding what "prove" means.

      --
      I once had a signature.
    5. Re:phone data usage by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      That's a rather extreme accusation, to accuse outright fraud and the faking of screenshots. You'd need some kind of evidence, but you don't have any. That you saw a different thing on your screen tells me there is some difference, perhaps geography, service level, or simply having been randomly selected to receive a different interface.

      Jumping straight to accusation of fraud without evidence is despicable, and gives you no right to even use the word "prove."

    6. Re:phone data usage by pikine · · Score: 1

      Obviously you condone double standard whereupon it is okay for someone to fake a screenshot and wrongfully accuse a telecom company of lying, and I who pointed out inconsistency in his dubious evidence have the burden of proof. What kind of wicked creature you are? All I am alleging is that he could have faked his evidence, and I have probably cause to believe that. He is the one who has to show the full evidence and defend it.

      I see you are having fun trolling other users in this topic. Here is my favorite Monty Python quote for you and get off my lawn.

      I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty-headed animal food trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!

      --
      I once had a signature.
    7. Re: phone data usage by Cramer · · Score: 1

      iOS has had per-app data counters for a very long time. (settings:cellular -- see the number under the app name? see the toggle to the right? see the "System Services" at the bottom?) Granted, *you* have to reset it every month.

  19. It is no wonder nobody know what is going on. by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1
    All these companies have such complicated data plans that keep changing it's no wonder nobody knows what is going on. Shared data, banked data, Etc. Then you have Facebook autoplaying ads, phones on the same account downloading eachothers apps, etc. Everyone now has a smart phone and most are the kind of people who think they won the Nigerian lottery. Probably 99% of data complaints are the fault of the user. Maybe it is time to switch to a company with better customer service.

    On my phone you can send a text and see how much data you have used. If I were the article author, I would keep a daily record of usage. It might not prove anything but it might help narrow some things down. It would be obvious when the data really reset and you could see if you were doing anything odd if you data spiked. Set an alert when you are getting close to your cap. Then turn data off.

  20. Something fishy by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Interesting
    T-mobile plans do not have contracts. One can leave the network anytime. So there is no real hold over the customers. If they have bought a phone on installment plan, you have to pay off the remainder, but otherwise no real hold. So typically t-mobile customer service is very nice.

    I have this issue of Rogers Wireless connecting to my phone across the Niagara River and charge me roaming. For some reason T-mobile is not able to stop it. May be they are owned by the same company or what not. So every time I go to Niagara Falls I can expect roaming charges. They have always been prompt in reversing the charges. It is typically 5$ to 15$. Just call, "say I have never been over the border" and the rep would reverse the chargers.

    Looks like the poster got some great publicity due to the earlier post about 750$ a minute roaming charge from AT&T. I think it is possible he was very diligent in checking the usage and fees and managed to get the under paid and uninformed phone reps to say things that he managed leverage into another highly visible "10 lies from T-mobile".

    Also T-mobile does not have over usage charges. It just throttles the connection speed. Even the throttled speed is 128 kbps which is good enough for google maps turn by turn navigation.

    I usually side with the small guy against the corporation all the time. Now I wonder if I am being gamed by this poster.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Something fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So their customer service is nice and would never say this, but I assure you, the rep who hears "I have never been over the border" thinks you're an idiot. Turn off international data roaming in your phone.

    2. Re:Something fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you check his "lies" carefully, he counts a lot of statements of information (Maybe he doesn't know how much data he's using, possible time delay on the website updating, call recorded for QA purposes, they would help troubleshoot a potential problem, etc.) as "lies". Given some of his solutions, I'm actually not sure I believe that he does realize all the sources of data his phone is using.

      At best there's probably four actually wrong statements in there, and those were probably just confusion too.

    3. Re:Something fishy by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      It was off. Still T-Mobile USA used to connect to Rogers Wireless Canada. They know the issue and reverse the charges. Recently I turned international roaming back on, It is just 25 cents a minute even from India. I have not been to Niagara recently. But, if I do, and if they charge me 25 cents a min, I might let it slide. It is 2$ a minute that ticks me off. 25cents a minute, total of 1$ or 2$, I might not bother to fight them for it.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  21. Re:Funny, my experience has been completely differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    T-mobile Hotspot limit is why i made sure i had a phone with an SD slot so i can DL to it on the unlimited phone plan and then transfer to my tablet and/or local streamer cache device like this http://www.ravpower.com/ravpower-rp-wd01-filehub-3000mah-power-bank.html

  22. One man's personal anecdote by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

    If one person's personal bad experience with T-Mobile is news, than perhaps it's newsworthy that I use T-Mobile and am completely happy with it. Recently I switched to the two lines unlimited data with Hotspot for $100, it's great. My wife and I use a lot of data and there's no throttling or any problems at all, and the hotspot works well (we both have problems with internet sometimes not being available at work).

    It works great in other countries, it's free to use data in Mexico (but with 3g) and in Asia (or anywhere, really) you could call people over wifi just like a normal phone.

    The only problem is that reception in hilly forest areas of the Bay Area is sometimes spotty, often with no data. AT&T is better at that.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re:One man's personal anecdote by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      If one person's bad experience with T-Mobile is news, it must just be that rare for someone to have an experience with them that's actually bad enough to complain about.

      I've had a few, but they've always been related to new plans or features that they were still in the midst of rolling out, T-Mobile always ends up coming through with a solution (even if it does take time), and the issues always seem to smooth out once a feature or plan has been fully rolled out and staff has been trained.

      Many here have worked with startups and will know quite well what growing pains are. Apparently, the news here is that smaller established companies experience them as well when they suddenly see explosive growth. I'm not sure how that couldn't be obvious to anyone who frequents this site. Can you and I really be the only ones here who get that?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    2. Re:One man's personal anecdote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If one person's bad experience with T-Mobile is news,

      Yup. T-Mobile is becoming a threat to the Verizon/ATT duopoly. Expect a lot more paid astroturfing blogs complaining about T-Mobile.

  23. international roaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it be cheaper to buy a SIM card in another country and pay 30 Euros/Australian dollars/Kronas/Great British Pounds/ect... instead of using an American SIM? Umm.

    1. Re:international roaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be cheaper to buy a SIM card in another country and pay 30 Euros/Australian dollars/Kronas/Great British Pounds/ect... instead of using an American SIM? Umm.

      Because T-Mobile actually has a decent international roaming plan.

      That's not to say that buying a local SIM card is not generally a good idea.

  24. Customer Service is on a downward trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There isn't much that can be deduced from a single incident -- especially hearing just one side of the story. But it is consistent with bad customer service that I have gotten everywhere. There is a big push towards metrics rather than actually helping people. Lying to someone helps out those metrics whether it helps the customer or not. It seems like companies that are trying to care about their support put in policies that actively undermine that support.

    The funny thing is, I now work for a company that provides phone systems to these kinds of call centers. I am new to it but I have already heard stories about how messed-up they are. While you are talking to a physical person, you aren't talking to someone who is treated as a person.

  25. Or: Maybe you don't understand the conditions. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Often when someone complains about their experiences on Slashdot, someone else post a comment with a superior attitude, saying that he has never had that problem.

    Please consider that maybe you don't understand the conditions.

    The element of the U.S. culture in which males compete with each other is annoying and defeating.

    1. Re: Or: Maybe you don't understand the conditions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The element of European culture where that snobbishly looks down at Americans is immature and annoying

  26. ThreeUK's "All You Can Eat" plan is the dog's bits by ihtoit · · Score: 4, Informative

    they have the most amazing thing going on there. £15 a month and you get so many minutes and so many texts, but the selling point is this, and this is right off the T&C page:

    "When we say all you can eat, that's what we mean. We do have a hard cap for domestic and pay as you go customers, but it's a cap you're unlikely to hit even if you saturate your connection 24/7 for a month."

    That connection is a 7MBit 3G cellular, and the cap is 1000GB. You CAN hit 1000GB a month but only if you can clear 34GB a DAY. That's a 100% wall-to-wall saturation of your connection with NO interruptions.

    I've been on this plan for several years now and NEVER ONCE have I managed to hit the cap. And I'm a heavy tethered torrenter.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by Powercntrl · · Score: 0

    Congratulations, you fell for T-Mobile's newspeak. Their "un-carrier" initiative basically meant taking everything people hate about wireless service, making it slightly worse and giving it a new name. They don't do contracts with those evil pro-rated early termination fees, no sir-ree! Now it's a finance agreement, which is totally not the same thing as a contract! Of course, they did get a slap on the wrist for being a bit misleading in that regard. However, they're still getting away with advertising "unlimited data" on all of their plans, when it's abundantly clear that the throttled data speed is completely unusable, once you've used up your high speed allotment.

    Here's a few suggestions:

    Check your data usage settings on your iPhone. Don't allow app updates over cellular data. Apps can also individually have their background data turned off. If you use Facebook, set it to not auto-load videos over cellular data.

    Complain to the FTC. They recently went after Straight Talk for offering "unlimited" plans that aren't, and T-Mobile's throttle speed is so slow, it's essentially no different than being cut off completely.

    Consider switching to Cricket (now owned by AT&T). You can get a 5GB plan for what you're paying T-Mobile and it runs on AT&T's far superior network.

    Lastly, do the math and see if it's just worth the extra few bucks a month to upgrade to the real unlimited plan. If your time is valuable, it might simply make more sense to cough up the dough, rather than hunting open WiFi hotspots and carefully monitoring your cellular data usage every month.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re: Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      Now it's a finance agreement, which is totally not the same thing as a contract!

      No it's not the same as the traditional cell phone contract. With the traditional cell phone contract, whether I buy an $800 iPhone or a $100 cheap Android phone, I would still owe the same termination fee. With t-mobile, I pay the cost of the phone and I'm done. Or I can buy any GSM phone that supports the bands that T-mobile uses and have no commitment.

    2. Re:Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having your phone on lay-a-way is not the same thing as being in a service contract.

    3. Re: Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by Powercntrl · · Score: 2

      No it's not the same as the traditional cell phone contract. With the traditional cell phone contract, whether I buy an $800 iPhone or a $100 cheap Android phone, I would still owe the same termination fee. With t-mobile, I pay the cost of the phone and I'm done.

      Then you fell for it, hook, line and sinker. Here's T-Mobile's old terms:

      $200 if termination occurs with more than 180 days remaining on your term; $100 if termination occurs with 91 to 180 days remaining on your term; $50 if termination occurs with 31 to 90 days remaining on your term; and the lesser of $50 or your monthly recurring charges (including any applicable taxes and fees) if termination occurs in the last 30 days of your term.

      Unless you were signing a contract for a dumbphone or an entry-level low-end smartphone, you generally came out financially ahead over paying full retail price for a flagship handset, even if you left the carrier immediately after signing up.

      What if you actually wanted a cheap phone? Well, here's the kicker - T-Mobile always allowed you to establish month-to-month service if you brought your own phone (or purchased one outright). All they've done as the "un-carrier", is put a positive marketing spin on eliminating discounted handsets. In other words, providing less consumer choice.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    4. Re:Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      You want unlimited data without throttling? They offer it for $30/mo. Otherwise, they don't cut off your data or charge you extra, so yes, it is unlimited usage, even if a portion of it is limited bandwidth.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    5. Re: Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      It goes beyond that, even. With a traditional cell phone contract, your bill doesn't change once you pay off the phone, because you never actually pay off the phone, because you aren't financing it; instead, the plan price is increased to subsidize the phone price, so you actually keep paying for the phone, even after it's been paid for several times over. With the finance agreement, once you pay off the phone, you stop paying for the phone.

      You're absolutely right, they're not even the least bit similar. I have no clue how some people can miss that. Personally, I quite liked paying $50/mo less than AT&T, for more services, for the first 18mo I was with T-Mobile, then seeing my bill drop by another $50/mo when both phones on the plan were paid off. I pay less than $150/mo for better service than I used to shell out $250/mo to AT&T for.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    6. Re:Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      It's not lay-away, it's financing. The difference being, the merchant holds on to your lay-away purchases until they're paid for.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    7. Re: Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The math is simple. The "discounted handset" is a myth. It's only discounted if you are an idiot and replace your phone frequently to get a marginally better one.

      Personally, I love being able to keep my inexpensive, easily replaceable (from a financial perspective) smartphone and not subsidize idiots that replace their $800 phone every time something marginally "better" comes out. Have had the same phone for going on 4 years now. Had t-mobile kept contracts, I'd have a couple hundred less in the bank than I do now with nothing to show for it.

      When T-Mobile switched to no contract, I was ready for a new phone and switched to their no contract plan. That plan was $18/mo (single line, single phone). When you figure in a 2 year handset replacement, that's $432 in monthly cost. That leaves about $218 off the retail cost of a brand new iphone6. And magically, you'll notice all the contract carriers charge $200 up front for an iPhone6. Basically, around $20 in reduced price over retail. What a wonderful discount! So, if you buy a top end handset every two years, your saving a small amount of money. If you wait one extra month, you break even. If you are not an idiot and don't replace expensive kit that often or buy cheaper kit, you're saving a ton of money.

    8. Re: Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      It goes beyond that, even. With a traditional cell phone contract, your bill doesn't change once you pay off the phone, because you never actually pay off the phone, because you aren't financing it; instead, the plan price is increased to subsidize the phone price, so you actually keep paying for the phone, even after it's been paid for several times over. With the finance agreement, once you pay off the phone, you stop paying for the phone.

      The crux of the issue is, T-Mobile used to offer both options. You could choose a traditional 2 year contract and subsidized handset, which was priced competitively against offerings from the other "big 3" carriers. It actually worked out to your advantage if you wanted a shiny new flagship handset every two years.

      They also offered a less expensive month-to-month option, with no handset subsidies. This existed before T-Mobile started calling themselves an "un-carrier" and removed the contract plans.

      As I pointed out in my original post (now modded into oblivion, likely by T-Mobile shills), if you already own your phone outright, there are cheaper places to bring it to. As an example, I pay $35/mo with absolutely no bullshit fees or taxes, for unlimited talk, unlimited text and 2.5GB of high-speed data (with the typical unusably slow throttled "unlimited data", thereafter). On T-Mobile, their nearest comparable plan (3GB) would cost $60/mo and they'd tack on all the fees and taxes, too.

      Let's ignore the taxes and assume a flat $25/mo price difference. With the money I'm saving by being on Cricket instead of T-Mobile, in 2 years, I've saved a total of $600. Using the iPhone as an example ($650 full retail price), the typical contract subsidy is $450. There's more than enough profit in T-Mobile's pricing to give you a handset upgrade every two years and still keep $150 more profit than Cricket. T-Mobile just uses clever marketing to trick you into thinking you're already getting the best deal possible!

      You're an un-customer to the un-carrier.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    9. Re: Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      the typical contract subsidy is $450

      Which doesn't apply here. When I first switched to T-Moble, I was paying less while financing 2 phones for unlimited everything (including unlimited LTE data), than I was paying AT&T for 700 shared minutes and 4GB of data per line. $50/mo, to be precise, or $1200 over 2 years. Plus the $100 paid to AT&T for my phone and $200 for my wife's, bringing the 2 year total AT&T ripoff to $1500. Now that both phones are paid for, the bill is an additional $50/mo lower; mind you, we paid $650 apiece for the phones, but there were cheaper options if we wanted them; that's not relevant here, though, since you have to buy your phone on Cricket, as well. That leads me to want to recalculate my savings over AT&T, completely ignoring the cost of the phone.

      Well, let's see, and keep in mind this is for 2 lines... AT&T, still $250/mo, whether you bring your own phone or buy from them, this is the cost of service, 700min/mo, 4GB data per line, unlimited texting; mind you, their rates have changed since then, so it may well be cheaper now. T-Mobile, $150/mo for services, unlimited everything, including LTE data. So, really, device cost notwithstanding, AT&T would have cost me $2400 more over the past 2 years that I've been with T-Mobile, had I stayed with them. That's one month's rent, one month's phone bill, and a night out for me and my wife. And, to be honest, unless we were frequent international travelers, or made frequent international calls, there's no way my wife and I could be paying T-Mobile any more than we already do for 2 lines; we have every feature already.

      I'm sure you're tempted to argue that I'm comparing AT&T to T-Mobile simply to make a more favorable argument for myself. The reality is, though, that I'm comparing one viable option to another. Cricket doesn't have LTE coverage in my area, while every other provider does. That's an important feature to me, so Cricket holds no value for me at any price; they're not a viable option for me. Now, they may have LTE coverage in your area, or that may not matter to you, in which case, more power to you. But let's go ahead and do the math for 2 lines of unlimited voice, texting, and LTE data on Cricket, anyway. According to their rates chart, they don't offer unlimited. Well, then, let's go with the highest option, 20GB, which is on promo for $60/mo right now, but I see a pattern in their rate options, which allows me to discern that this is probably normally $70/mo. $65 if I trust them to store my payment details, which I don't, so we'll use $70/mo. Times 2, but, oh, they'll give me $10/mo off on the 2nd line. $130/mo for limited LTE, in areas where they actually have LTE coverage, which is *nowhere* that my wife or I would be using our phones. Really, not worth the $20/mo savings; especially as I routinely top 10GB/mo, often topping 30GB, using my phone as a dash cam. Those months, it would be useless to me for 1/3 of the month, or more, as I use maybe 60min/mo; most of my usage is data.

      Again, if Cricket works for you, that's great. If their offering truly was viable for more people, more people would use them. I really hate to say it, since it flies in the face of everything I commonly say about people in general, but most people aren't completely stupid, they run through the math on these things (or have a trusted party who does this for them), weigh the pros and cons, and, ultimately, choose what works best for them. The features I'd have to give up to go with Cricket (unlimited LTE... actually, LTE at all) are worth considerably more than $10 per line (e.g. the $20 "savings" I would see with Cricket; and that's *after* T-Mobile adds taxes and fees to the bill) I would save. That I can finance my phone upgrades is simply icing.

      Of course, Cricket becomes a viable option at the 5GB level, where it's actually $30/mo cheaper for 2 lines than T-Mobile, f

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    10. Re: Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Oh, oops. Looks like they now have a family plan that includes 2 lines and unlimited LTE data for $100/mo now. That's $20/mo less than I've been paying, so I just switched to it. That puts T-Mobile unlimited everything and Cricket with a 20GB/line data cap at the same price after taxes and fees, if you've got 2 lines.

      Damn. Sorry about that, Cricket looked like it may have been a viable option for some people, but... well. Just... sorry. And thanks for prompting me to look into that; it's new since I looked last week.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    11. Re: Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Now that both phones are paid for, the bill is an additional $50/mo lower; mind you, we paid $650 apiece for the phones, but there were cheaper options if we wanted them; that's not relevant here, though, since you have to buy your phone on Cricket, as well.

      I think you're getting the current Cricket, a wholly owned subsidiary of AT&T, confused with the old Cricket (a regional CDMA carrier). They allow you to use any AT&T locked or unlocked GSM phone. The coverage is the same as AT&T's native (non-roaming) network. I use a iPhone 5S originally from Verizon, on Cricket; I certainly didn't have to buy one of their phones.

      According to their rates chart, they don't offer unlimited.

      T-Mobile and Sprint are the only games in town if you really need truly unlimited data. Once that becomes part of your selection criteria, you know what your options are.

      I say nearly because Cricket will cut you off after 5GB, while T-Mobile will throttle, and Cricket no longer offers tethering, so really. No. they're just not a viable option.

      Cricket throttles at 128Kbps, the same throttle speed as T-Mobile and Sprint. It's just as unusable on all carriers. You are correct, however, that Cricket does not offer any form of wireless hotspot/tethering add-on. They also don't do anything to stop you from tethering if your phone natively supports it, or if you've enabled it by way of rooting/jailbreaking.

      More-or-less, MetroPCS (which is now a wholly owned subsidiary of T-Mobile) offers exactly what you're getting now on the same network, for $120/mo. That's two lines at the base price of $60/mo each, a $5 family plan discount on each line for having two lines, then a $5 fee on each line for adding mobile hotspot functionality to both lines.

      What you'd lose is the ability to roam in the few places T-Mobile still has roaming agreements (looking at their map, I can't imagine where) and the ability to finance your next handsets. Is that worth $30/mo?

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    12. Re: Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Oh, oops. Looks like they now have a family plan that includes 2 lines and unlimited LTE data for $100/mo now. That's $20/mo less than I've been paying, so I just switched to it.

      Damn. Sorry about that, Cricket looked like it may have been a viable option for some people, but... well. Just... sorry. And thanks for prompting me to look into that; it's new since I looked last week.

      T-Mobile has actually been running the two unlimited lines for $100 promotion, for a few months now. It's a good deal if it suits your needs and depending on what your state's wireless taxes cost, since taxes and fees are extra. T-Mobile should tell their customers when switching to a newly-released promotional plan would save them a few bucks, but that'd be akin to AT&T lowering your monthly rate if you didn't use your upgrade eligibility. In both cases, the carriers are just hoping a customer's ignorance will continue to fill the coffers.

      Again, if you need truly unlimited, Cricket isn't an option. That's still no reason for people who use more modest amounts of data to pay extra for a higher data tier or unlimited plan that they don't actually need. Heck, a big part of the popularity of Ting (a Sprint MVNO run by Tucows) is that it can be extremely inexpensive for very light users.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    13. Re: Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I think you're getting the current Cricket, a wholly owned subsidiary of AT&T, confused with the old Cricket (a regional CDMA carrier).

      No, you simply misunderstood. Was your phone free? No, you had to buy one. I said "on", as in "with", not "from".

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    14. Re: Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      And, like I said, to each his own. If Cricket works for you, than great. I even said as much and I'm not ripping on Cricket or trying to tear them down in any way. You, on the other hand, apparently understand the market better than your initial misleading response to me seems to indicate, leading me to believe that was your intent. Thus why I clarified things.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  29. Another Dog bites man story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    News flash: Dog bites man and telco representatives don''t understand the intricacies of data plan computations and billings. I doubt that anyone outside of the poor programmers who set things up understand it either. As a rule when I call for companies for help I keep trying until I get an answer I like. If that strategy fails, you you can file a small claims suit, and a junior attorney from the company will eventually offer a settlement.

  30. Re:"Free Market" will 'fix' bad ISPs (yeah, right) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A free market in cellular data service? What planet do you live on? I want to move there.

  31. Re:Funny, my experience has been completely differ by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Great. If I could only get coverage at my home [NOTE: I live within the Los Angeles city limits], I would switch to T-Mobile in an instant.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  32. He confirms: T-Mobile was lying. Q: How much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comcast, or some Comcast employees or managers, are apparently causing outages so that they can make more money.

    It is easy for me to believe that someone at T-Mobile is doing something similar.

    In our area, T-Mobile lies about its coverage.

    1. Re:He confirms: T-Mobile was lying. Q: How much? by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 2

      > In our area, T-Mobile lies about its coverage.

      Then consider contributing some real end-user coverage mapping to the Sensorly project.

  33. Best thing John Legere has done by freddieb · · Score: 1

    Tmobile is just like anyone else. Trying to succeed in business. I have ATT. I think they give you more for the buck than tmobile. John Legere has done us all a favor though. ATT has given me much better rates to keep up with the competition he has given them and he has done this selling an inferior product (no low band lte coverage in most markets and limited pops.I have almost no tmobile signal at home (Atlanta area). I have a fair but solid ATT signal. Actually Sprint has more signal at my house than Tmobile. I refused to pay $60 plus a month for landline service and went to VOIP. I pay about $4/mo with the service and it meets my needs nicely. I pay ATT about 65/mo after taxes for 3gb data, which is plenty for me. Verizon is my only other choice and they can't match the price. So ATT is it for me unless I go to Cricket and take the capped data rates and roaming limitations.

  34. Did they tell you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that grey text on a white background makes for a shitty, eye-straining experience? No? Then who did cause your blog is terrible in that regard. This is what professionals are for, please go hire one and improve your sites readability. Thank you.

  35. I record all my calls by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    The virtue is that when I tell these people that the call was recorded... they suddenly get more cooperative. Its actually pretty awesome. I don't even need to play the recording to them to prove my point. I just tell them that I had a previous conversation with them, tell them what that was, and then tell them I recorded it. Which I did... but not one of them has asked to listen to it. They just submit.

    I've gotten a lot of refunds and credits on my account that way.

    Try it. First, get one of the apps for your phone that records calls... enable it... make your calls... and then when they start feeding you double talk... you tell them that the calls were recorded. They'll just give you whatever you're owed in most cases.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:I record all my calls by ProzacPatient · · Score: 2

      Be careful with this. In some states it is illegal to record a conversation unless a certain number of parties or all parties agree to being recorded.

      In my state in particular only the consent of one party is required and that party can be yourself if you're a participant of the conversation.

    2. Re:I record all my calls by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I'll take my chances... and in any case they always record me so I figure it has to be legal to record them if they're recording me.

      What is more, these stupid companies don't want a PR nightmare. if they sue me for recording them in a customer service call then they're fucked. So... Again... they can make my day.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    3. Re:I record all my calls by FLaSh+SWT · · Score: 1

      I've always felt this would be THE "Killer App" for iPhone. (It wouldn't surprise me that Android can already do it, not looking to get into that argument.)

      An option to record all calls or only calls involving certain people, etc. Just set it and forget it.

      The legality could easily be solved using GPS. For instance Texas is a one-party-consent state so recording could be enabled without that worry. Travel to a two-party-consent state and the phone disables recording or beeps every 10 seconds or something to alert everyone on the call.

    4. Re:I record all my calls by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      No one is going to charge you with a crime unless they know that you did it and that means you decide when it becomes relevant.

      I record every call. Every single one. Then once a month I delete them all. Easy peasy. The only people I've told that I recorded were the people at Time Warner Cable, the people at AT&T Business class Fiber, and the people at Comcast. Each of these groups said one thing and then tried to do another. So... I told them that I recorded them previously and without exception every single one of them modified their behavior without even having to hear the recording. They told me I had to give them money or they weren't going to install something or that my monthly service didn't include something... and in every case they just gave me what I wanted.

      And if they didn't give me what I wanted, I was going to replay the recording for them or someone else at their company to give them a last chance to give me what had been agreed. And if they didn't do that, I was going to post it on the internet hopefully creating a PR nightmare for them that would exceed the cost of just doing the right thing.

      That's how I operate. And that's how everyone should operate. I don't see how I or anyone else is exposing themselves to legal liability or criminal prosecution. What are they going to say? You didn't ask our customer service rep that informed you that YOU were being recorded that you were also recording them? That should go down really well when it hits the newspapers and possibly gets a US congressman on a select committee asking them questions.

      The corporations are going to avoid those risks. If they agreed to something it is usually in the records. They lie about stuff because their managers have told them that lying is a form of negotiation. If you have the calls recorded then they that closes off that avenue of negotiation which means they should just give you whatever they agreed to give you.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  36. Re:"Free Market" will 'fix' bad ISPs (yeah, right) by rea1l1 · · Score: 1

    I've been with Straight Talk $45 "unlimited" everything for several years. Never had a problem. Works off of the ATT network so excellent coverage.

  37. Not ever the first time with TELEKOM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    T-Mobile USA, that's still Deutsche Telekom AG (DTAG). Just think, I used to live in a country where the only
    phone you could get was from Deutsche Telekom. That was before the telecommunications deregulation.
    Back then Telekom (just turned into Telekom from it's origins as the German federal post and telecommunications
    service) would just INVENT charges on your bill. All of the sudden your 80 DM would turn into a 480 DM bill
    because they invented long distance calls you never made.

    Oh and it WAS NOT a mistake. It turned out that it was premeditated, on-purpose fraud and it still occurs in Germany
    a lot, not only with Telekom but with all the other long distance carriers as well.

    Germany is a country where fraud rules supreme and there are armies of attorneys there who make a living from
    intimidating people into paying fantasy bills. Companies bank on being able to intimidate their customers into paying
    exorbitant hidden fees, in fact hiding pitfalls and gotchas in every offer and then turning around and asking for lots
    of money is part of their business plan.

    Personally I blame all the eastern immigrants who thrive under these kinds of conditions but this culture of fraud has
    been there in place long before even the polack miners came to Germany in the 1800s.
    Don't be blinded by what you see on Deutsche Welle TV, you have to have lived in the country to really know
    what goes on.

    Now I am not saying that DTAG is any more or any less deceitful than ATT but I know their chuzpe from first hand
    experience.

  38. Meh.... This isn't that surprising, really. by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    I'm a fairly satisfied T-Mobile customer, but one thing I've found with them consistently is ANY time they offer a new feature, service plan or offer - the customer service folks are untrained on it for months and the handling of it is very inconsistent.

    I'm actually on wi-fi often enough so I never use that much LTE data in a month. For me, the "data stash" offer wasn't worth paying for a more expensive plan to get it. But yes, it would follow the trend I've seen with T-Mobile for them to have bugs in tracking it properly, phone reps who don't understand how their own web site works with regards to it, etc.

    When they first started offering those "pay only x$ down and make interest free payments over 24 months for your new device" offers, they were all mixed up too. People were going in or buying online and getting wildly different results as to how much money (if any) had to be put down for the initial purchase. (Eventually, they seemed to iron that out, with some kind of internal credit score based system that still keeps you guessing a bit until you get final word -- but is fairly consistent.) When my workplace signed on so employees buying T-Mobile for personal devices could qualify for a corporate discount, they had that all mixed up too. The retail T-Mobile stores couldn't tell me if I'd get the discount or not when adding a new iPad to a data plan, etc.

    I've just learned with T-Mobile to "go with the flow" basically. Pay your bill on time and if they hype up anything new that involves a plan change -- give it 2-3 months before you do it for the least amount of hassle and confusion. All in all, they've saved me a lot of money over using AT&T or Verizon, and gave me better phone handset options and more "extras" than Sprint ever did. They just rolled out LTE service in my town too, which I've been waiting and hoping for, for about a year now. (I mainly use my LTE data at work or on the commute, so it hasn't been a really big issue ... but it's nice to finally have the same level of service at home.)

  39. Obligatory Nelson response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HA! HA!

  40. Deregulation and oligopolies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get fucked because you let them fuck you. Europe has real competition and thus I pay 29eur for more minutes than I can burn, and 11gb per month of lte data.

  41. freedom pop really is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm better than everyone. my data service is free and freedom pop seems pretty sleazy on the outset, but i have had zero issues in a year

  42. Re:ThreeUK's "All You Can Eat" plan is the dog's b by Severus+Snape · · Score: 1

    Three haven't always been that good - a good few years ago (2009?), I was on an 'unlimited' data package with them, few months in to the contract I received a text citing changes they had made, my unlimited data was now limited to 500MB under "fair usage". I could not fucking believe it. It was in one of my parents name at the time, they kicked up a fuss for me but didn't get very far.

    I hope the rug isn't swiped from underneath you too.

  43. Re:Funny, my experience has been completely differ by chihowa · · Score: 1

    Call them up and tell them that. It may take little while or a few calls to get anywhere, but I've found that they actually respond to complaints about dead zones in their metro service areas.

    If it's just a little gap in a place with otherwise good signal, they'll make back the cost of installing a little repeater on a street light in a few months of gaining a new customer. Of course, if there's no signal for miles, they're not going to put up a new tower for you.

    Wifi calling actually works pretty well, too, but only on their branded phones (seriously, wtf?).

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  44. Another limitation/bug in their data billing... by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

    I have the unlimited plan which gives me unlimited data use for data that never leaves the phone (ie for data that isn't sent to a tethered computer).

    But the hackers who mess with the settings in rooted phones say that it isn't that you're charged for data as it goes out the wifi, it's that when you turn on tethering, the phone connects to a different APN.

    So actually I have a limited amount of data usage while tethering is on, whether the data leaves the phone or not.

    This affects me because it means that if I turn on a music streaming service in the phone while I have tethering on, I'll eventually run out of data whether the computer gets any or not.

    I haven't verified that it works this way... But that also makes me wonder, since on LTE, voice data is just packets, does that mean that taking phone calls while tethering uses up my tether data, or do they at least track that?

  45. Similar experience by Simulant · · Score: 2

    I was on T-Mo's $30/mo Unlimited text & data + 100 Voice minutes plan. If I used up the 100 voice minutes, and I regularly would by a phone call or two, additional minutes would cost $0.10/min so I kept 20 bucks in the account just for insurance. Yet... ever time I went over 100 minutes I was cut off from voice. In some cases data was cut off too. My buffer never kicked in. I would end up having to renew early or at least manually. Auto-renew did not work. This went on for nearly a year before I got sick of it.

    So then I looked at my data usage (on the T-mo website) and it was always un 5 GB/month. Well under. So I decided to switch to the $30/month unlimited Voice + 5GB data plan. This should work... but it didn't. My data was cut off after two weeks. I had somehow exceeded my limit even though I NEVER had before. And guess what? Under this plan they don't let you see your stats. You can't even see how much data you've used when you log into your account.

    So I gave up on the bargain basement plans and went for the 40/mo unlimited voice/5GB data w/throttle instead of cut off. I consoled myself by thinking that I'd at least have unlimited music streaming & international data but... NO. That only kicks in at the 50/mo level. Found that out the hard way.

    So now I'm paying for $50/month unlimited talk/text/data (only 1GB at 4g) plan, mostly for the privilege of no monthly billing hassle. This is really only slightly cheaper than Sprint, last I looked. I am abusing the free music streaming though and I have two international trips planed where I intend to use data.

    It's still not a bad deal but my take away is this.... T-mobile will still nickle & dime you to death as well as the others and their low end plans aren't worth it unless you are patient and diligent. I'm also pretty sure they are playing games with your data stats.

    1. Re:Similar experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out the new Ting GSM that will be released soon. Thy appear to be using the same network, but at much lower rates for most users. No unlimited, though because they do not tend to have hidden fees.

  46. Re:Meh.... This isn't that surprising, really. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    This perfectly mirrors my experience. They always eventually sort it out, you just have to be patient and try not to scream at the phone reps; understand that most of them actually do want to help, but they're hamstrung by a back-end system that wasn't designed for the number of users it currently has.

    Growing pains. Yes, established players feel them, too.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  47. Parents canceled AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parents canceled AT&T. AT&T refuses to acknowledge that service as been canceled, raided their rates effective on the day they canceled, and is continuing to bill them.

  48. Re: ThreeUK's "All You Can Eat" plan is the dog's by ChiefGeneralManager · · Score: 1

    I've been with Three for some time and they began cutting my tethering. How - out of interest - do you tether while convincing them it's the phone eating the data?

  49. My favorite T-Mobile lie: 128 kbps by OneRealSmartCookie · · Score: 1

    "At most" is not nearly large enough of a phrase for T-Mobile to hide behind considering that throttled speeds on T-Mobile fall short of 128kbps by more than an order of magnitude. And to be clear, yes, I am talking bits here. Once my 5 GB is up I'm looking at speeds that top out at 10 kilobits per second, barely enough to load the Google home page (over 800 kilobits) yet alone browse to the T-Mobile website and feed more money to the beast. It's a stupid game to play, balancing cheap phone bills with the best of the worst service available. I assume T-Mobile fully understands this and enjoys seeing how well they can train me to use exactly 4.99 Gb every 30 days.
    https://support.t-mobile.com/d...

  50. Re: ThreeUK's "All You Can Eat" plan is the dog's by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    I don't. I'm totally honest with them. Told them when the floor fell out of my signal one day that it might have been something I did, they were straight back and telling me that their relay had actually burned out - yes it was me caused it, but I wasn't to know and neither were they that three days of solid saturation on a HSDPA connection would kill their hardware (though it had happened elsewhere). Within an hour a new mobile tower was up and I was back online. The CSM's exact words to me: "you paid for unlimited, you suck up all the bandwidth you want to. If the signal drops again just let us know and we'll have you back up again before you hang up." They didn't even hint at billing me for a new RF uplink coil.

    I don't know of any Android torrent clients. They know what sort of traffic is going through their network, if you lie to them they will know and they will punish you for it.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  51. Re:ThreeUK's "All You Can Eat" plan is the dog's b by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    I think I'm one of the lucky ones. My mother has had nothing but connectivity problems (iPhone, hah! Solved with the purchase of a Nokia Lumia 630) and later bandwidth problems (suburban with the nearest tower too far away for HSDPA, she was stuck at 3MBit on a good day, wouldn't even stream Youtube on an average day), there's me in the convergence zone of no less than three towers now.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  52. Re:Funny, my experience has been completely differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same for me.

    Cheaper bill than AT&T and better Data experience, using the same phone I had on AT&T. Mileage varies though, and I understand that.

  53. Just traveled overseas... by j33px0r · · Score: 1

    Anyone saying that they are completely ripping you off (and OP especially) is full of crap. Not the best service when out of country but it really isn't that bad...you simply feel like they are trying to take you for a bit of a ride...nothing you should be surprised of when dealing with an American company.

    Here's my flight path (last week mind you, got home last night): Chicago --> Frankfurt --> Istanbul --> Toronto --> Chicago
    I had Internet the whole time with less than 5 minutes of sync-up after arriving in each new country.

    The only downsides to TMobile when out of country is that your data plan is slow and they try to get you to spend a silly amount for high speed Internet while in the foreign country. Calls in country are 0 (same as your normal plan) and calls to the US are 20 cents/minute which is silly but not horrible. Internet on phone is mediocre while out of country.

    Want to complain about something? Focus upon the crappy airline food and lack of Internet access while on planes. Or better yet, focus upon the crappy people who don't know how to turn off their ringer on a plane. So many other problems in life centering around schmucks that don't appreciate how far we've advanced than rolling across the border with minimal fees. $750 is a bunch of crap...not reflective of actual TMobile customers. The 6 bucks to chat with my sister for 30 min from Istanbul is real though its my fault for not skyping or using facetime.

    1. Re:Just traveled overseas... by KevReedUK · · Score: 1

      ...$750 is a bunch of crap...not reflective of actual TMobile customers.

      Maybe that's why he made it clear in the summary that this figure relates to a previous blog post he had made about his previous supplier, which was AT&T, not T-Mobile.

      --
      Just my $0.03 (At current exchange rates, my £0.02 is worth more than your $0.02)
  54. Low contrast site by SageMusings · · Score: 1

    It is a real pain to attempt to read anything on these low-contrast web sites. Does anyone know of a good way to correct these sites? Maybe a CSS injector to enhance the text vs the background?

    --
    -- Posted from my parent's basement
  55. Also with WIFI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a few days into my new billing cycle my WIFI started flashing "Data Usage Warning" and subsequently I had terrible data connectivity. I checked the web site and it showed basically 0 usage which is what I expected since the new cycle had just started. I keep my WIFI turned off when not in use, and there are no "apps" to steal bandwidth. Since I never use more than 1.5GB of my 3GB (used to be 2.5GB) allotment, there is no excuse for this. I would rather T-Mobile kept their stash and gave me back my old service.

  56. Fuck off, Jeff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another click-bait piece of shit article.

  57. Perhaps I'm dense and need a translation... by JakeBurn · · Score: 1

    So this fuckwit went to Canada, turned on data roaming, turned on the app with one of highest data usages then cries when they charge him for it? THEN he actually leaves the company that
    A. Refunded his idiotic mistake.
    B. Refunded the insurance they had him buy to cover HIS mistake
    and goes to a company that fucks everything up. Way to show for the 15th trillion time in human history that just because your dumb enough to believe that the grass is greener on the other side doesn't mean you won't eventually look like an idiot when you go crying that the grass really wasn't any better over there.

  58. Wonder what they're using to measure traffic flows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back when I was working at a multi-facility web/dedicated/co-lo hoster we used to use Netflow at the border routers. The only issue with it was that it only reported traffic for end points when the connection was closed, so long-lived persistent connections wouldn't show up in real time.

  59. Re:Funny, my experience has been completely differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your phone is rooted, you control the mobile hot spot setting. They do use the user agent string to block desktop browsers. User agent string is easily changed.

  60. apple is no less complex than data by bingoUV · · Score: 1

    Did you even read the post to which you replied?

    In case this was supposed to be an on-thread-topic post, apples have so many different types of matter. There is water, sugars both simpler and complex. There are trace amount of vitamins. There are proteins - both from the apple tree as well as any insects that might have made this apple their home.

    Many of these are behind the scenes - i.e. under the apple skin. Why should an apple vendor have to weigh all of these to be able to sell a pound of apples? Data pipeline providers don't have to - T-Mobile is the only judge of how much data a customer used. Their "scale" or "meter" doesn't have to be approved by any regulator.

    Why so much unfairness against apple vendors?

    --
    Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  61. The Data Trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Data should not be a high suffering experience for consumers:
    Dec 2013: 'O2' network, UK: Israel: Total stranger visiting new family, first time (>=60km from Airport), open Google Maps.
    O2 sends warning messages in minutes: "You are close to your 25 UK pounds ('GBP") limit, keep going ?" No option.
    On arrival (1 hour) I had spent GBP 500 = US$750.
    Call Verizon US - Yes your US 'jetpack' will do that for US$25 a month. It worked.
    Back in UK, phone O2. "Scandal; bad trading; unacceptable". "No quarter." "Give me the CEO, he needs to hear this." "He knows all we do."
    Complaints. Time. OK we credit you half. NO I want zero charge, as apology - this is not how to run your stuff.
    No. OK I am paying you GBP43 a month. Discount to present value, few years = GBP 42k? Throw that away for GBP250?
    We dont care. OK let me pay in 5 installments.
    I changed networks. 'THREE' network cost me GBP20/month. Israel Dec. 2014: ALL DATA AND VOICE FREE. Israel was just added to their 'Fell at home' range.
    Sender sf@miracleread.com

    1. Re:The Data Trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mistyped present value - meant GBP4k (guess - didnt do the calculation)
      Moderator can change please
      A.Non-Coward sf@miracleread.com

  62. Re:Meh.... This isn't that surprising, really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently switched to TMo and bought a moto X, and agree that the customer service is kind of spotty when it comes to deviations from the norm. I had quite a bit of a chore trying to get them to set me up for a prepaid account and transfer my phone number over from Verizon. They eventually got it done, but it took some work and quite a few transfers. Apparently I could have done it online via online checkout process instead quick and painless.

    That said, I switched from Verizon because they are known and proven liars. I was looking at adjusting my plan because of low data usage, so I went to go look at my data history...and found out they were rounding data up to the nearest gigabyte, no matter how little you used that month. After monitoring it for 2 months, I averaged 150mb a month, which magically turned into 1gb when you viewed it in your billing history. I suspect that this was intentional to prevent people switching to lower data cap plans.

  63. Re:Funny, my experience has been completely differ by RyoShin · · Score: 1

    I like T-mobile as well, but have a completely opposite plan. I rarely use my phone (no social life), don't want to do anything on the web, and never travel outside a 60 mile radius from home. (Once in the last three years.) I dropped Verizon and switched to T-mobile, going with their prepaid option and a cheap flip phone. I top off the account and pay 10c min/text. This might seem like a lot for those who use their phones quite often, but for me this is great. With Verizon I was paying $70/mo, even after military and a secondary discount, and they said I couldn't get a no-data plan if I had a smartphone (I had a Droid 2 with them). With T-Mobile I've averaged about $15/mo.

    Their signal can be weak and spotty in my area (Boulder, CO and abouts), and I can't get any picture/long texts (a rare occasion for me) because I don't have a data plan, but outside those I am extremely happy that I switched to them.