Slashdot Mirror


FedEx Won't Ship DIY Gunsmithing Machine

An anonymous reader writes Last fall, Defense Distributed — the company created by Cody Wilson of 3D-printed gun fame — announced a DIY gunsmithing machine called the Ghost Gunner. Now, FedEx is refusing to ship the device, saying there are laws or regulations that would prohibit them from shipment. A FedEx spokesperson said, "This device is capable of manufacturing firearms, and potentially by private individuals. We are uncertain at this time whether this device is a regulated commodity by local, state or federal governments. As such, to ensure we comply with the applicable law and regulations, FedEx declined to ship this device until we know more about how it will be regulated." Wilson argues, "They’re acting like this is legal when in fact it’s the expression of a political preference. The artifact that they’re shipping is a CNC mill. There’s nothing about it that is specifically related to firearms except the hocus pocus of the marketing."

44 of 320 comments (clear)

  1. Oh bullshit! by rfengr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are no regulations covering firearms manufacturing equipment; at least not YET. They are just covering their asses.

    1. Re:Oh bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yet Cody Wilson and his ilk, some of the world's biggest libertarians, are upset that a private company like FedEx refuses to carry their packages? Yawn. Come back to me when the USPS refuses (and then we'll talk about how they are semi-private as well thanks to previous tax-cutting and libertarian action).

    2. Re:Oh bullshit! by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wonder what the Justice Department has to hold over their heads.

      The same thing they have to hold over everyone's heads: a large number of lawyers looking to right the wrongs their employer tells them to. Also the IRS. They don't need any actual wrongdoing, just the lawyers.

    3. Re:Oh bullshit! by aaron4801 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      UPS recently paid $40 million dollars because they shipped fake drugs. Like they were supposed to open all the packages and verify the contents? FedEx is currently facing fines for up to $1.6 Billion for the same. This may be totally unrelated, but at the very least, they are likely not in the mood to go poking the government in the eye over a niche product.

    4. Re:Oh bullshit! by msauve · · Score: 2
      But there are laws covering motor carriers, including FedEx Ground. My understanding (lawyers feel free to step in) is that they must carry goods per their tariff, which does not prohibit the equipment in question.

      A carrier providing transportation or service subject to jurisdiction under chapter 135 shall provide the transportation or service on reasonable request. In addition, a motor carrier shall provide safe and adequate service, equipment, and facilities.

      49 U.S. Code section 14101

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:Oh bullshit! by Jiro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't seem to understand libertarianism. Libertarians believe that private actions should be legal. Libertarians do not believe that you should not complain about private actions.

      Furthermore, in this case, if FedEx really is afraid of legal liability, or if the government is in other ways putting pressure on them, it's not a private action anyway. Government involvement is inherently not private.

    6. Re:Oh bullshit! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      UPS recently paid $40 million dollars because they shipped fake drugs.

      They didn't ship fake drugs. They shipped real drugs: prescription drugs from Canada.

      Like they were supposed to open all the packages and verify the contents?

      They didn't need to open the packages. They already knew what was in them.

      If the government did not stop this activity, our health would have been at risk of deteriorating to Canadian levels.

    7. Re:Oh bullshit! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Change "guns" to flowers and Customer type from "gun loving" to Gay and see if you have a change it attitude.

      FedEx refused to ship flowers to a gay man

      You see, there is NOTHING "immoral" or "illegal" about either flowers, gunsmithing equipment, being a gun lover or lover of men. In fact, there is nothing different here except POPULAR OPINION.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    8. Re:Oh bullshit! by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've heard of similar things. For example, this guy sending air, water, and sugar.

      As long as you have the right safety labels, there shouldn't be a problem. The guy in the above link screwed up with the "Rocket Fuel" label.

      If they were sending a mill, why did they say "It's a machine for making guns"? IT could have been labeled as coming from "GG Machine Works", and if they needed a declaration of contents it's just "a CNC machine."

      I can't even think of the countless things I've shipped. Usually I'm only asked on International shipments for the customs declaration. If I explain what's in them, it's too complicated, so they just put "computer parts" or "tools".

      I've received some things that surprised people, like ammunition (legally marked and shipped as such, handled by UPS), a truck front axle, and all kinds of weird smaller things.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    9. Re:Oh bullshit! by fightinfilipino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Change "guns" to flowers and Customer type from "gun loving" to Gay and see if you have a change it attitude.

      FedEx refused to ship flowers to a gay man

      You see, there is NOTHING "immoral" or "illegal" about either flowers, gunsmithing equipment, being a gun lover or lover of men. In fact, there is nothing different here except POPULAR OPINION.

      except you're adding unnecessarily to the hypothetical

      "FedEx refuses to ship flowers." is DRASTICALLY different than "FedEx refuses to ship flowers to Alpha because of who Alpha is."

      FedEx is refusing to ship a specific product, not refusing to deliver products to people because of their identity. The situations are entirely different.

    10. Re: Oh bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anybody had enough of things getting regulated or hated on because of what people call them? Call something an attack tool and everybody goes bananas. Call it a "security auditing tool" and it's magically ok (especially if it costs way too much). This is the same thing.

      Oh, yeah: unabashed liberal here and FedEx can go to hell over this one because trampling on ANY freedom is bad. This is exactly why we should never have a private-only delivery and mail system in the US as well.

    11. Re:Oh bullshit! by laurencetux · · Score: 2

      well then i suppose Hemlock Belladonna Fox Glove and Monkshood are not flowers then

    12. Re:Oh bullshit! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      UPS recently paid $40 million dollars because they shipped fake drugs.

      They didn't ship fake drugs. They shipped real drugs: prescription drugs from Canada.

      Like they were supposed to open all the packages and verify the contents?

      They didn't need to open the packages. They already knew what was in them.

      If the government did not stop this activity, our health would have been at risk of deteriorating to Canadian levels.

      No, our health costs were at risk of deteriorating to Canadian levels.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    13. Re:Oh bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Neo-Cons posing as Libertarians don't understand Libertarianism. The rest of us actually do.

      As for the right to complain, yes, we embrace it, but in addition his points seem salient to me. If the actions of FedEx are truly motivated by fear of governmental retribution then we should fix the government. If instead, FedEx is simply stating that they are feeling anti-gun today, we can both complain about their private actions (e.g. boycott their service) and consider introducing laws to further protect our civil liberties.

      The current (and I would argue just) rule is that if you offer a service like wedding cakes to a hetero couple, you must offer it to gay couples as well. If you offer to ship machinery that's useless for making guns, then you should offer it for machines useful for making guns.

    14. Re: Oh bullshit! by lucien86 · · Score: 2

      Maybe we could build a Terminator and like send it back in time to save America.

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
  2. political preference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have worked for fedex for 15 years. I assure you this is not a hippie liberal company.

    Corporations are naturally risk adverse. And it doesn't matter if it's a marketed mill... we can't ship a ball bearing certain places if you tell us it can be used on a tank. Regulations are what they are.

    1. Re:political preference? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you say it is "X", FedEx has to treat it like "X". It you say it is not X, you (the liar) will bear the liability. So FedEx doesn't care. If you say it is "X" when it is "not X", why would FedEx risk it?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:political preference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Look, this guy isn't complaining because he can't ship what he wants, he's complaining because it's good business. More complains = more news coverage = more sales. Everyone here is making some good points, and the libertarian thing is kind of funny, but the more a story is made out of this, the more he wins. He's getting free advertising right here.

    3. Re:political preference? by HiThereImBob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you say it is "X", FedEx has to treat it like "X". It you say it is not X, you (the liar) will bear the liability. So FedEx doesn't care. If you say it is "X" when it is "not X", why would FedEx risk it?

      It is "X". It is also "Y" and "Z" along with "L", "M", "N", "O", and "P". CNC Mills can be used to make damn near anything. I am officially notifying FEDEX that any CNC Mill can be used for gunsmithing. Also, Lab equipment / chemicals can be used for making drugs and bombs. Plane parts can be used to assemble planes a terrorist could use to crash into a building, and car parts can be used to facilitate both murder and drug smuggling. Camera and video equipment can be used by pedophiles, as can computers and networking gear (do I really need to keep going?). I expect them to step up and stop shipping these things at once.

  3. FedEx is a private business, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can't they refuse to ship anything on whatever grounds they want, or are they mandated to carry anything that they aren't banned from shipping?

    1. Re:FedEx is a private business, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Cody Wilson, self-avowed libertarian and near anarchist, is upset that a private company refuses to do business with him. News at 11.

    2. Re:FedEx is a private business, isn't it? by Jiro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't seem to understand libertarianism. Libertarians believe that private actions should be legal. Libertarians do not believe that you should not complain about private actions.

      Furthermore, in this case, if FedEx really is afraid of legal liability, or if the government is in other ways putting pressure on them, it's not a private action anyway. Government involvement is inherently not private.

      But then I already said this.

  4. Re:UPS - No Problem. by TWX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are parallels that can be drawn to how devices capable of home recording were viewed when they were new.

    The manufacturer has chosen to market this device specifically for the production of firearms. They do not appear to have marketed this as a general-purpose device. It's reasonable to expect that purchased units will be used for the purposes of producing firearms. It doesn't really matter much that the device is capable of producing other goods, that's not how it's being sold.

    Mills, lathes, and other metalworking equipment sold as general-purpose machine-shop equipment don't have this problem because they're not being marketeted for this specific purpose.

    This contrasts well with the situation of home recording because devices capable of making recordings but intended to be general-purpose machines (ie, tuning for live watching, playback of commercial tapes, etc) were marketed differently than devices sold specifically for duplication or mass recording.

    FedEx is free to choose with whom they'll conduct business. If they feel they are taking-on risk by shipping these machines then they're free to not ship them, like how cutomers and businesses are free to use anyone else that will take them to do such shipping.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  5. RE: expression of a political preference by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lol. If he just told the FedEx rep that he was shipping 1'x1'x1' aluminum mills, there would be no problem. This is what he gets for over sharing. It's like telling police officers you smoke weed.

  6. lawyers are not geeks; geeks are not lawyers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Intent matters. You sell a bong as for tobacco and you're fine - you sell it as "FOR GETTING HIGH ON MARIJUANA" and you're in the shit. Argue with the law if you want (although the law makes a lot more sense than geeks like to think), but don't argue from a position of ignorance.

  7. Irony by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So here's a guy who calls himself a "libertarian", declaring that it's not legal for a private entity to refuse to do business with him based on their political views.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:Irony by Gliscameria · · Score: 2

      Any freedoms end if they hurt business. That's the new Libertarianism.

      --
      X
    2. Re:Irony by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      not really the argument being made

      fed ex is claiming that it might be illegal to do so (which is wrong), has nothing to do with political views.

      In fact, if fedex came out and claimed it was their views, im sure cody would simply say ok, and use UPS without much of an issue

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    3. Re:Irony by DRJlaw · · Score: 2

      So here's a guy who calls himself a "libertarian", declaring that it's not legal for a private entity to refuse to do business with him based on their political views.

      Where does he declare that it's illegal for FedEx to refuse his business?

      "Defense Distributed's founder Cody Wilson argues that rather than a legal ambiguity, FedEx is instead facing up to the political gray area of enabling the sale of new, easily accessible tools that can make anything -- including deadly weapons. 'They're acting like this is legal when in fact it's the expression of a political preference,' says Wilson."

      He's declared that they've disguised a political decision as 'due caution' concerning a legal issue, not that what FedEx is doing is itself illegal. Because you'd have to own a political decision, but you can blame the government for 'ambiguity' even if the government isn't actually threatening to interpret the law that way.

      It's not irony, it's poor reading comprehension... on your part.

  8. Re:So much for the 2nd Amendment by CaptainLard · · Score: 3

    ones explicitly protected by the US Constitution are ignored?

    You mean like how you're ignoring the First amendment? Assuming this actually is Fedex taking a political stance on your worst nightmare and not just risk aversion, where in the second amendment does if force private businesses to ship equipment designed for firearms manufacture?

    In a related story, rest easy with that 45 under your pillow because you've won the war: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...

    Now can we focus on real problems?

  9. Re:I don't get it. by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 3, Insightful

    sex toy industry... It's not hard.

    I see what you did there....

    --
    Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
  10. Re: expression of a political preference by zieroh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's almost like he was more interested in publicity than in actually shipping a product.

    --
    People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  11. Re: expression of a political preference by ganjadude · · Score: 2

    well now everyone knows he has a product. and i doubt UPS will refuse his money. so it is a win win for them, while at the same time painting fedex in a bad light (regardless of this being their "right")

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  12. Re:UPS - No Problem. by msauve · · Score: 2

    He's obviously part of that Anonymous group, and on the watch list.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  13. Re:So much for the 2nd Amendment by ubrgeek · · Score: 2

    Yes, but the Amendment's delivery is delayed due to bad weather. FedEx apologizes for the inconvenience.

    --
    Bark less. Wag more.
  14. Re:I don't get it. by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

    This is a fight that doesn't need to be dealt with. Just call it a CNC mill, which is designed for fabricating automotive parts. Hoppes calls their #9 product, "lubricating oil", instead of "gun oil." Might as well not have to deal with a wedge issue when it comes to business if one doesn't have to.

    Unless the whole point is to create publicity by deliberately creating wedge issues. In other words, it doesn't matter what FedEx said, because now I have a great advertising platform - buy my stuff!.

    Like Apple developers who deliberately code something that will not pass muster to cry foul and say "oh, we have an Android version buy that!".

    The goal is not force companies to act in ways you want them to act so you can create attention for yourself. "Poor me, the big bad FedEx won't ship my stuff! Oh, btw, I have a new gunsmithing machine! You can buy it today!". That's how I read this advertisement.

    That's what it really is - an ad. Creating a wedge gives you publicity that can be worth several million dollars and be far more effective.

  15. There's still a legal problem by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

    I am no fan of firearms and would take them out of your (not cold and dead) hands if I could. That said, isn't FedEx a common carrier? There are rules for such things.

    1. Re:There's still a legal problem by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

      The rules say they can refuse a shipment that they believe to be illegal, and notify law enforcement, too.

      Yes. The problem here is establishing when a tool is one for violating the law, and when is it just a tool. And courts can place much credence upon the creator's own explanation of the tool, which is damned incriminating, IMO.

      So, what bothers me about this is the extent to which it impairs the transport of other similar tools, not this particular one.

    2. Re:There's still a legal problem by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Fortunately, it's not illegal to make a [legal] gun. Having made it, it's illegal to do many things with it without special dispensation or a special license, but as I'm sure you know that tends not to be the responsibility of the manufacturer so long as the device can successfully be shown to have "substantial non infringing use"- I believe the saying goes.

      What it boils down to is that you shouldn't attempt to intentionally provoke people with fancy names unless you're looking for attention. Simply declaring it as a CNC machine would have done the job. But perhaps publicity was the goal.

      I predict that FedEx will eventually decide that they should ship this stuff anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. Re:So much for the 2nd Amendment by unrtst · · Score: 2

    But yeah, they also have some severe restrictions on what they're not allowed to carry, and they err way on the side of caution. If you told them "this is a block of lead, and I plan to melt it for bullets", they may well refuse, and by some legal interpretations they might *have* to.

    http://www.fedex.com/us/freigh...

    Item 780, section B-6:
    Carrier will transport small-arms ammunition when packed and labeled in compliance with local, state and federal law, and the Hazardous Materials section of this Service Guide. Ammunition is an explosive and must be shipped separately as hazardous materials. You agree not to ship loaded firearms or firearms with ammunition in the same package.

    So I'm damn sure the implied use for the lead wouldn't keep it from being shipped. There may be other reasons, but nothing due to bullets.

    However, you can't ship:
    Money (and, apparently, anything like it)
    Alcohol
    Porn
    postage stamps
    letters, with or without stamps
    valuable paper of any kind
    fresh food
    Articles of extraordinary value (extraordinary value is defined as items valued in excess of $50 per pound per package).
    artwork
    film, photos, negatives, etc
    jewelry
    tobacco products (unless shipped from and to a licensed dealer/distributor)

    I found a few of those to be kinda surprising, but almost all of them tend to fall under some loose umbrella of "stuff you could use in place of money". The other excludes make sense in other ways... like "More than 100 pounds of NA3178, Smokeless Powder for small arms on any motor vehicle" and other "we don't want to blow up our drivers and the neighborhood around them" type stuff; or fresh food, where they probably just don't want rotting food attracting animals and bugs and generally being nasty.

    They also won't ship firearms, unless it is from and to a dealer/distributor. This is where I think the gunsmithing machine hits a grey area. I'm 99.9% sure there wouldn't have been any problem at all if they just said it was a CNC mill, which it is. If it can pop out a complete firearm upon arrival and being plugged in, then it's just like sending the firearm (it can't do that, but they don't know that, and it says it'll make guns).

  17. Re:So much for the 2nd Amendment by hambone142 · · Score: 2

    I ordered bulk .22 Cal. ammunition online. Federal Express shipped it to my rural address. It was in a box labeled "ORM-D" and had a label indicating "contains ammunition or small firearms". The left the box down by my road at my (closed) gate that they have instructions to open. OTOH, my stock broker sent me a "thank you" gift of some nice wine. That required "a signature of an adult over age 21 that is not under the influence of alcohol". I got a laugh out of both events.

  18. Don't need to read the article to understand why. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    FedEx is probably playing CYA.

    The problem is that DD's box is designed to machine "80% receivers" to completion. The reason FedEx is playing CYA is because an 80% receiver is legally a "non-gun" in the eyes of the BATFE (until the policy gets changed) and anyone - and I mean ANYONE - can buy an 80% receiver because it's just a lump of metal. It's the machining of a couple of holes, pockets, and chambers that convert an 80% receiver into a firearm. Yes, the BATFE pretty much defines a firearm as the part of that can hold the fire control group/magazine/barrel. Which is why the BATFE looks at some of the laws of California (PRC - Majority of US Constitution/Bill of Rights/Federal Law considered invalid there because they're "special") and says "Huh?"

    Anyway, since anyone can buy a lump of metal called an 80% receiver - including minors, etc - and also purchase (if they have the money) a "takes no skill to machine 80% receiver into a firearm" box, it's pretty obvious that a minor - or someone else who is disallowed purchase of a firearm - can buy both and fabricate a AR-15 type platform. So FedEx is likely looking at this and going "Yeeks! I don't want to get sued."

    Now, machining an 80% receiver to 100% - which takes some skill - in your own home is perfectly legal, assuming you are allowed to possess firearms. Machining 300 or 80% receivers to 100% in your own home is perfectly legal - if you are allowed to possess firearms and do not intend to sell them - but if people [BATFE, local cops, etc] might look at you REAL funny if you do. You can even sell a firearm you manufacture - however, there's a bunch of laws pertaining to how many you can sell, and you can't build with the intent to sell, etc. It all gets into a "can't disprove that you manufactured with intent to sell" situation unless you have a handy piece of paper called an FFL - but if you are an FFL holder, you're not likely to be "manufacturing" with one of DD's "single purpose" CNC machines. FFL'd manufacturers usually have real tools, or connections with other manufacturing companies to get the parts that they want.

    The gray area that likely has FedEx a little freaked is the "anybody can do this" combined with the "push a button" features - and the habit of people suing everybody and everything related. Remember, in the US there are the "Can't sue a manufacturer for producing something that does what it is supposed to do" laws which shields companies like Colt, Bushmaster, and other from wrongful death suits, etc. So, in order to prevent the inevitable "sue the delivery company for shipping a device to this guy who built this firearm and then sold it to this other guy who used it to kill a dozen people" lawsuit brought by ambulance-chasers.

    I find the "we're not going to ship" response from FedEx entirely understandable, especially considering the "sue everyone" behavior endemic to the US legal system. Remember, under the US legal system, if you can sue your competitor - or person with an opposing viewpoint often enough - you can legally bankrupt them to the point where they are no longer in business - or if they are a person, homeless and disenfranchised. This is not to say I approve of FedEx's decision/policy. But my approval or disapproval of FedEx doesn't matter, since I am just someone posting as Anonymous Coward.
     

  19. Re:UPS - No Problem. by sumdumass · · Score: 2

    Thats why i only post from stolen tablets on the free WIFI at various fast food places like McDonalds using VPN accounts purchased with stolen credit cards.

    Oh, and i also wear a tin foil hat- not to be confused wiyh the cheap aluminum foil hats.

  20. Re: expression of a political preference by unrtst · · Score: 2

    It's like telling police officers you smoke weed.

    No... but it is like labeling the pipes your store sells as "hash pipes". Some stores (possibly only in certain states, especially now that pot is legalized in some states) will happily sell you bongs and small glass pipes and bubblers and one hitters etc etc etc so long as you do not refer to them by any of their cannabis-associated names. Some go a step further, and will ask you to leave the store if you do refer to them by those names, pretending that "they are not in the business of selling paraphernalia". This is a WHOLE LOT like that (though I think the store may have got in trouble with the law _before_ instituting that policy).