Slashdot Mirror


Snowden Reportedly In Talks To Return To US To Face Trial

HughPickens.com writes: The Globe and Mail reports that Edward Snowden's Russian lawyer, Anatoly Kucherena, says the fugitive former U.S. spy agency contractor is working with American and German lawyers to return home. "I won't keep it secret that he wants to return back home. And we are doing everything possible now to solve this issue. There is a group of U.S. lawyers, there is also a group of German lawyers and I'm dealing with it on the Russian side." Kucherena added that Snowden is ready to return to the States, but on the condition that he is given a guarantee of a legal and impartial trial. The lawyer said Snowden had so far only received a guarantee from the U.S. Attorney General that he will not face the death penalty. Kucherena says Snowden is able to travel outside Russia since he has a three-year Russian residency permit, but "I suspect that as soon as he leaves Russia, he will be taken to the U.S. embassy."

107 of 671 comments (clear)

  1. Bad idea by cheesybagel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really bad idea. If he was going to do this he should have never bothered leaving in the first place.

    1. Re:Bad idea by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thinking the same thing here.

      I love living here and all, but damn - if I were a young single guy and my home country wants me imprisoned (or worse - probably worse) over uncovering illegal activities they committed?

      Screw that - I could learn Russian easily enough, many of the women there are reportedly rather cute, vodka ain't that bad as far as booze goes, and I can easily deal with living in cold-ass weather 9 months of the year.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. Due process is for matters which don't threaten the ruling class. Matters which do threaten the ruling class are considered "too important" for the regular judicial system, because the first and foremost concern of the ruling class is to maintain and propagage the ruling class -- exactly as it has been since the dawn of coercive authority.

    3. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really bad idea. If he was going to do this he should have never bothered leaving in the first place.

      Maybe he felt that being out of the immediate grasp of the US Government gave him a lot more breathing space to talk about it and discuss the leaks, even if he didn't actually want to leave the US. If he'd stayed in the US it would have been much faster and easier to shut him up quickly and let it peter out, in contrast to him video conferencing all over the place and responding to questions to give a deeper insight into what went on.

      That said, he seems to be considering returning on the basis of certain guarantees from certain people. Given the dirty tricks he has exposed, does he expect them to honour those guarantees? I get that he wants to return because he misses the people and places of home, but even if he openly expects a prison term, does he expect everyone inside and outside the government to be fair and reasonable?

    4. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bad idea, because he's not getting a fair trial as a matter of principle. He's already branded a traitor by every gov't branch, and that kinda predetermines what'll happen when he's tried.

      The only way he can go home is if the US somehow elects a conscientious president, who gives him a pardon. Which won't happen with a president from either major party.

    5. Re:Bad idea by infolation · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe he's just testing the water, to find out what kind of reaction this provokes from the US. He clearly knows better than anyone what the consequences of what he's doing would be.

    6. Re:Bad idea by phorm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      However, you're not really going to be doing much better with the Russian government that the US government...

    7. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe he felt that being out of the immediate grasp of the US Government gave him a lot more breathing space to talk about it

      Absolutely. We may have never learned that Snowden existed otherwise.

      That said, he seems to be considering returning on the basis of certain guarantees from certain people. Given the dirty tricks he has exposed, does he expect them to honour those guarantees?

      He may now be famous enough that he couldn't be simply "disappeared" or sent to Guantanamo. That's the best guarantee.

      Sadly, this used to be a shield in other countries -- sufficient international fame to prevent disappearance. Now, you might need it in US.

    8. Re:Bad idea by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      However, you're not really going to be doing much better with the Russian government that the US government...

      Won't have to... just work for a private company in some capacity. Even if it wasn't in tech, I'd rather be a lowly factory worker in East Bumfuck, Russia than a famous prisoner in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    9. Re:Bad idea by kaizendojo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Better yet, go to Ukraine. Less Putin, more cute women. Sorta like Russia-Lite.

    10. Re:Bad idea by grahamsz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think his own actions make that quite clear. If he's been stuck in a US prison do you think he's be able to still communicate with journalists to draw attention to his leaks, would he be able to testify at the European Union?

      He's already demonstrated that he's more valuable to advancing his agenda when he's able to communicate, than if he were in prison alongside Chelsea Manning. He's not running away like a coward, he's running away like someone who's determined to make his actions count for as much as possible.

    11. Re:Bad idea by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As I've said before, if he's really this stand up guy, why did he run? IF he really had good and legal reasons to do what he did, take it to court and face the music.

      I know, right? Like how the Sons of Liberty didn't disguise themselves as Indians before dumping a load of tea into Boston Harbor, and then when done, turned themselves in to the nearest British garrison? We need more heroes like those fine, upstanding, nametag-wearing gentlemen.


      if you break the law to make your point that the law is unjust you should stand ready to be arrested, imprisoned and tried in court for what you choose to do.

      "Ready to be" doesn't mean adopting a Gump level of naivete and making it easy for the government to remove you from the public view. By him fleeing the country (and seeking asylum in a country we traditionally mock for their lack of an open and fair government, no less), we continue to discuss Snowden's actions years later. If he had stuck around, we would all have forgotten about him as soon as the next weekly scandal distracted the media.

    12. Re:Bad idea by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > IF he really had good and legal reasons to do what he did, take it to court and face the music.

      What if he did the right thing but that happened to be illegal? Then I think running is a reasonable thing to do.

    13. Re:Bad idea by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not Finnish. ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    14. Re:Bad idea by arth1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better yet, go to Ukraine. Less Putin, more cute women. Sorta like Russia-Lite.

      ... and soon enough, Russia proper?

    15. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He may now be famous enough that he couldn't be simply "disappeared" or sent to Guantanamo. That's the best guarantee.

      Might not disappear, but they can still torture him for months without much outrage. See Manning.

    16. Re:Bad idea by johanw · · Score: 2

      Even if there are riots, they won't help. Police officers still shoot black kids in the back out of self defence.

    17. Re:Bad idea by Shakrai · · Score: 2

      I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law. - MLK Jr, emphasis mine

      I can't arose much sympathy for someone who professes to love his country but seeks refuge from a regime that stands opposed to virtually everything his country stands for. There are people who are willing to die for this country, without fame or recognition, but Mr. Snowden both outs himself and refuses to face a jury of his fellow citizens?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    18. Re:Bad idea by Marginal+Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Easy: if rioting ensues, the trial must have been unfair - just as in Ferguson. Isn't that how the legal system is supposed to work? Who needs prosecutors, judges, and juries when you've got a very large jury of angry peers to decide them?

    19. Re:Bad idea by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As I've said before, if he's really this stand up guy, why did he run?

      Because he didn't feel he was going to get fair treatment from the government. It's the same reason why a multitude of whistleblowers flee their parent country for fear of retaliation.

      IF he really had good and legal reasons to do what he did, take it to court and face the music.

      Riiight. Because the government never plays dirty against whistleblowers, right? Oh wait... Obama is one of the worst presidents when it comes to trying to attack whistleblowers.

      Civil disobedience has ALWAYS carried the potential for punishment and if you break the law to make your point that the law is unjust you should stand ready to be arrested, imprisoned and tried in court for what you choose to do. You don't break the law and then run away like a coward...

      Said by a big, brave keyboard warrior. Get back to us when you actually face a similar situation to the one Snowden is in.

    20. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm confused: do you believe in rule of law (Congress, judges, juries, etc.), or do you believe Snowden taking the law into his own hands? It tickles me that the law suddenly becomes very important when we need to determine whether or not Mr. Snowden violated it, but it was of no importance to Mr. Snowden when he was (allegedly) violating it.

      Is the "hero" the guy who violates the law or the guy by disclosing secrets, contrary to terms he signed when he got his security clearance, or is the "hero" the guy who wants the law to be applied fairly to his own case.

    21. Re:Bad idea by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Civil disobedience has ALWAYS carried the potential for punishment and if you break the law to make your point that the law is unjust you should stand ready to be arrested, imprisoned and tried in court for what you choose to do.

      You assume he'd get a trial which was anything other than a secret kangaroo court, operating under secret laws, and that he'd get a fair trial.

      When your government has decided it doesn't give a fuck about your laws and your Constitutional rights ... you don't stick around to "face the music".

      The only way we'd have ever learned half as much is by him leaving.

      And, curiously, the people who were breaking the fucking law in the first place have had pretty much zero repercussions.

      Do you see Cheney up on charges? Or Bush? Or Obama? Or the head of the CIA?

      Of course not, because those clowns are operating under a different set of laws than you and I do.

      Face it, America is handling this like a banana Republic .. if the only thing the AG is promising is no death penalty, maybe the AG doesn't give a crap about the law, or the truth, just protecting the government when it shits all over the Constitution?

      Face it, America is now being ran by people who don't believe the law applies to them. Which means you should be very angry with the people in power, and not enabling them to keep acting like this.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    22. Re:Bad idea by bledri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know if Russia is a good place for someone like Snowden who likes to expose government corruption. Then again, maybe he'll have better luck than Boris Nemstov.

      Luckily, if the Russians ever decide to jail him for exposing government corruption, he's likely to get that "fair and impartial" trial that he evidently thinks he needs a guarantee for in the US.

      The fact that Putin's Russia is also a bully does not absolve the US of it's hypocrisy and misdeeds.

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    23. Re:Bad idea by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, Ukraine would never trade Snowden to the US for military aid against Russia.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    24. Re:Bad idea by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know if Russia is a good place for someone like Snowden who likes to expose government corruption. Then again, maybe he'll have better luck than Boris Nemstov.

      Luckily, if the Russians ever decide to jail him for exposing government corruption, he's likely to get that "fair and impartial" trial that he evidently thinks he needs a guarantee for in the US.

      As long as it is only the US government's corruption, abuse of power and their ongoing rape of the US constitution that Snowden is exposing then I'm pretty sure the Russians are perfectly happy to allow him to continue and if Snowden has half a brain he will allow the Russians opposition to handle exposing the similar shenanigans of the Russian government.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    25. Re:Bad idea by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

      Thinking the same thing here.

      I love living here and all, but damn - if I were a young single guy and my home country wants me imprisoned (or worse - probably worse) over uncovering illegal activities they committed?

      Screw that - I could learn Russian easily enough, many of the women there are reportedly rather cute, vodka ain't that bad as far as booze goes, and I can easily deal with living in cold-ass weather 9 months of the year.

      Except you're not some random expat in Russia. You're a spy who has left everything behind, and not necessarily trusted by the Russians, either; since they cannot predict what you might do or say if you leave. They can't very well let you talk to whoever you want, get a job where you might learn something of interest you could reveal, or turn on them if you decide life there is worse than when you left. You have to wonder if the Russians one day will decide they get a better deal turning you over to the Americans what they get by protecting you; and possibly feeling guilty about what you did, if even only those you left behind, and add in loneliness and it may not be as idyllic as you hoped. Now comes the hard part for him; the realization he never can really return.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    26. Re:Bad idea by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "allegedly" violating it - he has not been convicted yet, and the presumption of innocence should prevail. We don't know if a jury would find sufficient cause, given the circumstances and the illegal acts that were being covered up, to find sufficient justification.

      Kind of like "yes, I went through the red light, but I was carrying someone who had been shot and was bleeding profusely to the hospital as quickly as I could."

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    27. Re:Bad idea by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      Face it, America is now being ran by people who don't believe the law applies to them.

      Just now?

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    28. Re:Bad idea by bledri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really bad idea. If he was going to do this he should have never bothered leaving in the first place.

      As I've said before, if he's really this stand up guy, why did he run? IF he really had good and legal reasons to do what he did, take it to court and face the music.

      Civil disobedience has ALWAYS carried the potential for punishment and if you break the law to make your point that the law is unjust you should stand ready to be arrested, imprisoned and tried in court for what you choose to do. You don't break the law and then run away like a coward...

      I don't give a shit if he's a stand up guy, he deserves due process and the US does not hold up it's end of the bargain anymore (assuming it ever did.) We live in a time when it's illegal to discuss the fact that you've received a national security letter, much less the content. We live in a time when labelling someone a "terrorist" means they have no civil rights. People are held without being charged. People are flown to other countries to be tortured. US citizens have been targeted for assassination in other countries. But you think Snowden, knowingly throwing his life away, to expose the depths of the US government's intrusion into our lives is a coward? Because that's what he did, and knew that he was doing it. What sacrifice have you made to hold the government accountable?

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    29. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is very strong evidence that the government has subverted the rule of law. This is a problem, but not the real problem. The real problem is that there is no legal mechanism for exposing this subversion, prosecuting the corrupt, and preventing future recidivism. The whole system, congress, president, judiciary, military-industrial complex, are united against reform.

      In the meantime,the full weight of the same system has been and will be unleashed against those that try to expose it to the light. There is no legal recourse, and this excuses Snowden's actions, nay, makes him a hero.

    30. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are spouting the RT party line, muddy the water so that people do not notice that a dozen of Putin's detractors have been executed and summarily covered up by the police

    31. Re:Bad idea by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know about rioting, but I can tell you that if he returns home, and doesn't receive a fair trial, I will be one of the ones out there protesting.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    32. Re:Bad idea by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      As I've said before, if he's really this stand up guy, why did he run? IF he really had good and legal reasons to do what he did, take it to court and face the music.

      Snowden seems like a stand-up guy, Assange seems like a moron and a jerk. In either case, focusing on the person distracts from what matters: the problems in the US government.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    33. Re:Bad idea by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

      Yeah, Ukraine would never trade Snowden to the US for military aid against Russia.

      Well, if the US were willing to risk an armed conflict with Russia in order to get their hands on Snowden, they don't need to wait...

    34. Re:Bad idea by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You have to wonder if the Russians one day will decide they get a better deal turning you over to the Americans what they get by protecting you

      Historical trivia: The Russians have done that before. When Hitler came to power in Germany, hundreds of German leftists fled to Russia, assuming they would be safe in a communist country. The Russians turned 600 of them over to Hitler as part of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

    35. Re:Bad idea by king+neckbeard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps you should try actually thinking instead of pounding your chest to the tune of the Star Spangled Banner? MLK publicly addressed unjust laws by being punished in a manner that was clearly unjust. If Snowden is punished, it will be hidden from the public and over laws that are effectively secret from the people. Also, had he not run, we likely wouldn't have been able to get as much press. You should be far more concerned that the NSA is insane, stupid, and practically unchecked in their power, instead of complaining that Snowden didn't follow the MLK edition of the Civil Disobedience handbook to the letter.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    36. Re:Bad idea by Coren22 · · Score: 2, Informative

      +1 for believing the propaganda despite all the evidence released. Sat photos are hard to fake, and sat photos of artillery/tanks entering Ukraine from Russia are pretty damning evidence.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    37. Re:Bad idea by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A trial would answer all those questions - but we can't bring the government perps to trial for some reason.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    38. Re:Bad idea by LVSlushdat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Face it, America is now being ran by people who don't believe the law applies to them. Which means you should be very angry with the people in power, and not enabling them to keep acting like this.

      Which is why I look at Edward Snowden as a true American hero.. If he were to come back to the US, I doubt he'd even get as "fair" a trial as Irwin Schiff did..
      http://www.takelifeback.com/ir.... Irwin's only "crime" was to publish books showing of facts showing clearly that there was/is NO law requiring Americans to pay an "income tax".. I live in Las Vegas, and attended a large part of the "trial".. His attorney was prevented from presenting evidence, and was also prevented from presenting evidence disputing the endless lies presented by the IRS and the prosecution.. Irwin was brought into the courtroom in shackles and prevented from speaking in his own defense by the judge. The "icing on the cake" of this "kangaroo court trial" was the fact that the judge, in his jury instructions, told the jury that they MUST find Irwin guity .. or THEY would be in violation of the law.... After the trial I spoke to a couple of people who were on that jury and they told me they were convinced of Irwin being not-guilty, but the completely illegal jury instructions scared them such that they voted to convict.. Whether or not you know (or believe) that the "income tax" is totally bogus or you've bought into it like a very large number of Americans, this type of "Star chamber" trial is VERY un-American... And this would be the type of trial that Snowden would receive, AT BEST....

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    39. Re:Bad idea by hey! · · Score: 2

      Well, this is the thing about civil disobedience. The classic formula is to keep up awareness of your issue by forcing the government to go through the embarrassing and drawn-out process of prosecuting and punishing you. I'll bet they had to drag Thoreau kicking and screaming out of that Concord jail cell when some joker finally came along and paid his poll tax for him. Holding court for his admirers in the town pokey no doubt suited his purposes nicely.

      In that spirit, this announcement is very effective. When was the last headline you read about Edward Snowden? If he comes back for a long and drawn out trial that'll show he's pretty hard core about this civil disobedience thing -- if leaving a cushy, high paying job in Hawaii with his pole-dancing girlfriend to go to fricken' Russia wasn't enough.

      It occurs to me, though, that this situation is a lot like what I always say about data management systems: the good ones are easier to replace than the bad ones. Likewise the better governments, the ones with at least some commitment to things like due process, are much easier to face down with civil disobedience than ones where being a political threat gets you a bullet in the head, like Ninoy Aquino or Boris Nemtzov. If Snowden *does* come back, and if he ends up "detained" in limbo somewhere, then it'll be time for everyone to go into the streets and bring the government down.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    40. Re:Bad idea by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And no one will care, you can stand out there all you like, you'll be ignored...

    41. Re: Bad idea by Marginal+Coward · · Score: 2

      He did pretty well with English, a language where pronunciation has nearly nothing to do with the way you write it

      Says you. (Translation: "sez u")

    42. Re:Bad idea by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Well, the lesson is: Don't get caught. But, well, that's the lesson to learn from anything involving doing time for.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    43. Re:Bad idea by Shakrai · · Score: 2

      You'll forgive me if I decline to discuss my views of the relevant NSA programs, since /. isn't exactly welcoming to opinions more nuanced than "Snowden Good. NSA Bad."

      All I'll say on the subject is that there are mechanisms in place for people who feel their Government is doing wrong. He could have gone to the relevant Congressional committees or the Inspector General at NSA. He could have used the whistleblower act. He ignored all of those options and leaped straight to leaking, then further threw the baby out with the bathwater by leaking details of programs that had no bearing whatsoever on domestic civil liberties, like NSA's activities against China. In effect, he substituted his judgment for the judgment of our elected representatives, an act of extraordinary hubris in the words of Robert Gates.

      In spite of everything I may have retained some understanding of his choices had he opted to selectively leak the details of NSA's domestic activities. He didn't do that though, he took as much as he possibly could and leaked it all, with no consideration for the damage it would do to American interests and national security. That may not mean anything to you but such actions have far reaching ramifications and I don't recall seeing Mr. Snowden's name on the ballot when I was selecting the people who would wield that power on my behalf.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    44. Re:Bad idea by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      And then what?

      I don't really like Putin. Personally I consider him a huge step back in Russia's way towards a real democracy (ok, it's not like there are any good role models left for that, but ... hey, let's remember the good ol' days when the US had to pretend to be the good guy 'cause of the bad Commies), but the question is "what comes after?"

      I can't help but compare him to Saddam. Saddam sure was not a good leader. But even his tyrannic regime was better than the clusterfuck that's going down now.

      At least for everyone outside Iraq...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    45. Re:Bad idea by Shakrai · · Score: 2

      Most likely he would be tried under a military tribunal as an enemy combatant, which means he is already guilty no matter what evidence is presented.

      Our country can't even move forward with the military tribunals of unlawful combatant foreign nationals captured aboard, even though such tribunals are explicitly allowed under both domestic and international law. You think we'd be able to do it against an American citizen, for crimes allegedly committed on American soil? Give me a break. This is the type of conspiracy theory nonsense that makes internet discussions a complete waste of time. Study how the real world works, it's a lot more boring and bureaucratic than you think.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    46. Re:Bad idea by grahamsz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also I think it's fundamentally wrong to view "civil disobedience" as a one time thing. Him handing a bunch of documents to Glenn Greenwald wasn't the singular act of disobedience.

      He's still acting in a disobedient matter. He's still sitting on the bus if you will. And he is still suffering the consequences of his actions, even if that doesn't mean rotting in prison.

    47. Re:Bad idea by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The number of grammatical cases is irrelevant. Question: What's the difference between a grammatical case without stem changes and a postposition (opposite of a preposition? Answer: A space.

        That which is challenging, apart from stem changes, is the same thing that is challenging with helper words in general: when to use what with what. Picture a person learning English and trying to remember what to use with what. "I was scolding her.... over it? for it? about it? to it? around it?" "We were unhappy.... over it? for it? about it? to it? around it?" "She was dedicated.... over it? for it? about it? to it? around it?" And so forth. It's the same for people trying to learn which declension case to use in which context. But if the declensions are just suffixes without stem changes, then they're no different from postpositions. And often stem changes where they occur follow pretty predictable rules, often for pronunciation reasons.

      --
      You know when it's okay to shout fire in a crowded theatre? When it's on fire.
    48. Re:Bad idea by Jiro · · Score: 2

      Rosa Parks was arrested and tried, but her trial was public. You can't call attention to the injustice of the law if the trial is secret and nobody is even allowed to talk about what happens at it.

    49. Re:Bad idea by occasional_dabbler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This, absolutely this. Anyone with a brain and a conscience can say that Snowden did nothing but a service to the majority of the people in the world, whatever his motivation. Given his position as someone who could be 'crushed like a bug' by any side, he has a way better chance flying closer to Putins's flame than Obama's (or Jeb's or whatever other monstrosity the US vote in next)

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs," I said. "we have a protractor"
    50. Re:Bad idea by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

      How many tenses do you think there are in English?

      There is "wigwam," and, "teepee," so there are two tents.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    51. Re:Bad idea by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      How cute, you believe that. You do realize what they teach you in high school is a complete fantasy.
      Also how about that whole 6th amendment being suspended because "we are at war" bullshit.

      Or did you forget that nice tidbit that the scumbags in congress passed?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    52. Re:Bad idea by StikyPad · · Score: 2

      Yes. I'm also tired of the line, "at least we live in a country where we're free to have that discussion."

      First, all the things we do right are not an affirmative defense against the things we do wrong. Mother Teresa would still go to jail if she murdered someone.

      Second, it's not much of a discussion if the people who say that put their fingers in their ears and shout, "I'm not listening!" when you try to talk to them. Which is what that line is designed to do -- distract from the actual topic of discussion by having a meta-discussion.

  2. Don't do it, Snowden! by jdavidb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They will hang you, literally or figuratively. Build a good life in Russia, and keep speaking out.

    1. Re:Don't do it, Snowden! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm thinking that the US is simply wearing him down. they can wait, they have time. but he's living in a kind of prison right now, anyway. his freedom is highly restricted. plus, well, russia is a shit-hole. who in their right mind would want to STAY there if you've known and grown up with better?

      still, I would never trust this 'agreement'. the US has a hard-on for fucking him over and there will be NO fair trail, you can bet on that.

      the US makes up its own rules and it would take an extremely lucky person to walk out of such a situation alive, in one piece and not be always watching over your shoulder.

      his life is mostly over, as it is. really sad to have to say that, but living in the US will always be a 'look over your shoulder' kind of life. he will be hunted the rest of his life, if not by government thugs, then by CITIZEN thugs who think they are being 'patriotic' (dammit!).

      there is no good move for him. I wish him the best, he's my ultimate hero, but I don't see this ending well at all ;(

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Don't do it, Snowden! by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      plus, well, russia is a shit-hole. who in their right mind would want to STAY there if you've known and grown up with better?

      Compared to Club Fed (if you're lucky - Death Row if you're not)?

      I'll take "Shit-holes I'd rather spend the rest of my natural life in since prison or death are the only other alternatives" for $1000, Alex!

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:Don't do it, Snowden! by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 4, Funny

      He should stay. Anna Chapman is there. The US offers nothing that good.

  3. He should have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lied under oath to Congress.

    No penalty for that.

    1. Re:He should have by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or given classified documents to his biographer. I hear that you can just plead guilty to a misdemeanor in that case.

  4. Full blooded American here by bhcompy · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...and I wouldn't trust any guarantee I received if I were in Snowden's situation. His best case scenario would be to find himself a nice country(read: not Russia) without an extradition treaty and negotiate his way there. The only way is if the president officially pardons him or he is convicted in absentia and the president commutes his sentence, but even then, they'll find something to stick on him, just like they used the IRS to take down gangsters and the mafia.

    1. Re:Full blooded American here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The US has threatened trade sanctions with countries willing to take him in. For example, the US held a tree trade treaty with Ecuador hostage over it the first time around (the revocation of which would have crippled the country). Putin was the only one who had the guts to say: "meh - do your worst". The US is playing hardball when it comes to Snowden - and people around the world are starting to notice. The whole affair has been a horrible black mark on the image of the US - both from what the NSA has done, to how the government behaved trying to get Snowden.

    2. Re:Full blooded American here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just because there is no treaty, does not mean he cannot be extradited, just that it will be harded. About the only Countries in the World where he would be immune from American grasp are maybe Russia, North Korea, Belarus, and possibly China, and the Islamic State, but I'm pretty sure he does not want to join ISIS.

    3. Re:Full blooded American here by QRDeNameland · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the fact that the USAG won't guarantee his constitutional right to a fair trial is as horrifying of an indicator of how corrupted the US gov't has become in the post-911 era as any I can think of.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    4. Re:Full blooded American here by MondoGordo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wonder if that is the whole point of the negotiations in the first place ... to show just how corrupt and unreasonable the system is? I wouldn't be surprised if Snowden never expected it to go anywhere meaningful in the first place.

    5. Re:Full blooded American here by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are already guaranteed a right to a fair trial. It's not something that the AG can "add to" or deny. Compare a trial in the US to a trial in, say, North Korea, Russia, Saudi Arabia, or the territories controlled by ISIS/ISIL. Even some of the most egregious examples of non-impartial trials in the US seem fair in comparison to treatment of suspected anti-government persons in those states.

      The problem is that Snowden's version of "Fair" and the general standard of "Fair" in the US are still probably fairly widely separated. He would probably like whistleblower status for everything, ignoring the parts of classified documents he released which were sensitive but not necessary to indicate the underlying problems he wanted to expose. He would probably like the damage he did to the US relationship with its allies to be inadmissible, along with the potential tactical advantage gained by other states as a result of the massive, unfiltered release of classified US intelligence documents.

      I think he should really spend his effort working on his Russian and praying that Putin never grown tired of him.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    6. Re:Full blooded American here by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      shill detected!

      "damage he did"...

      you just gave youself away. the US did damage. he just reported it!

      another one for the old killfile. thanks for IDing yourself as a stupid government shill.

      we can clearly see who is being paid to write dissenting posts, here. its not hard.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    7. Re:Full blooded American here by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      fwiw, do you think any of the 5 eyes (uk, oz, etc) would give him a fair trial?

      no such luck!

      any time you piss off the spymasters this much, you won't usually live very long, or have a good life. he ran for his life, very literally.

      there cannot be a fair trail because you insulted the king and the king is very very mad at you.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    8. Re:Full blooded American here by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are already guaranteed a right to a fair trial. It's not something that the AG can "add to" or deny.

      Guantanamo Bay says differently.

    9. Re:Full blooded American here by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, because writing an opinion that differs from yours is clearly only possible by being paid to do so. *eyeroll*

      Making public a lot of things that people suspected but didn't quite know did indeed damage relationships. Had he not released the documents, the relationships would have continued as before.

      Whether or not the secret actions should have been authorized in the first place is an entirely different issue. From my perspective, having to stamp "secret" on an authorization to do things that you know would piss off your friends is a sign that you probably should not be doing these things, or make you re-evaluate who your friends are.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    10. Re:Full blooded American here by stoploss · · Score: 2

      You misunderstand. His plane will go down on the way to trial, killing him in a tragic coincidence.

      No, that's too obvious. He will suddenly contract aggressive, terminal cancer. And, when his DNA is analyzed, it will show he was genetically predisposed to this through a de novo mutation.

      He will be too ill for trial and won't live long enough in any case. Bad luck, man!

  5. One condition should be by fredrated · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All the scum responsible for the illegal spying go on trial at the same time.

  6. The problem is ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is he a traitor, or was his whistle blowing justified?

    The real problem is that he could be both at the same time.

    Same as in the military, if you disobey a direct order and that disobedience ends up saving lives, you can still be charged with disobeying a direct order.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:The problem is ... by blue9steel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Traitor: One who commits treason
      Treason: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.

      He didn't levy war on us, he didn't adhere to our enemies, nor did he give them comfort. There is a flimsy argument that perhaps his actions gave aid to our enemies but if you roll with that reasoning then all of the people he exposed are also traitors so I'm not sure that's an argument the government would want to make.

      He may be a criminal under the current laws, but he's not a traitor. Furthermore, if what he did was illegal then it's the law that is wrong and should be changed. The correct action would be for him to receive a presidential pardon followed by congress strengthening the whistleblower laws and a big shakeup at the NSA to root out their culture of taking activities beyond what they are authorized for. I'm afraid we don't live in that rosy alternate universe however.

  7. Re:Snowden isn't coming - this is all a ruse by Princeofcups · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Snowden isn't going to come to the USA willingly to face trial. This is all a ruse. His Russian handlers may just be messing with the US or it may be said to get some publicity. If Snowden really wanted to face justice, he wouldn't have done what he did. His handler is quite right that if Snowden leaves Russia he may end up extradited to the USA. Snowden is going to stay as a permanent "guest" of the USSR, cough cough, I mean Russian Republic as long as Putin is in charge and possibly longer. Wait for it - in the end Snowden or his handlers will say that he couldn't get the guarantees he needed about a fair trial, so he won't be coming. Even if he really wanted to leave and face US justice with no pre-conditions, I don't think Putin and his former KGB boys would let Snowden leave.

    Except Snowden is no longer a person who should expect anything from either government. He's just a PR pawn at this point. If the US offers Russia something in return, like concessions in Ukraine, and someone thinks that they could get a big PR win out of it, then expect him to be escorted to a D.C prison post haste.

    --
    The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
  8. Stupid move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If he think he'll get a fair trial or even humane treatment he's kidding himself. There is no such thing as a fair trial in this country, the deck is stacked in favor of the prosecution at every stage and we saw how they treated Manning. They've shown at every step of the way they are willing to ignore the law or make it up as they go while doing whatever they want. Even if Russia is becoming an authoritarian regime, it's more freedom and probably better treatment then he'll get if comes back.

    1. Re:Stupid move by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      http://billofrightsinstitute.o...

      he will NOT get a fair trial, that was removed from american law with the PATRIOT act.

      All the scumbags that supported the passing of the PATRIOT ACT should be deported from the United states and labelled as traitors.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  9. He is crazy by gatkinso · · Score: 2

    The trial will be classified. He will be made an example of to prevent further leaks. He'd be nuts to return.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  10. Run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't see any upside in returning to America to be humiliated by the propaganda machine of the United States government with an automatic conviction. Talk about show trial. Snowden's motivations would be attacked from every angle and he would get no opportunity to tell his side or explain his motivations in court since a judge would immediately silence any testimony to that effect. A Snowden trial would set back the cause of Liberty.

    1. Re:Run by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think the Snowden trial would mirror the trial in Alice in Wonderland:

      [trial begins]
      US Government: Now, Ha ha... are you ready for your sentence?
      Snowden: Sentence? Ah, but there must be a verdict first!
      US Government: Sentence first! Verdict afterwards.
      Snowden: But that just isn't the way!
      US Government: All ways are...
      Snowden: Your ways, your majesty.
      US Government: Yes, my child. Off with his head!

      And I don't think any "magic mushroom" is going to make Snowden grow over a mile high and thus able to walk out a free man.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Run by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      With the difference that Snowden at least knows what he's accused of.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. no doubt living in Russia sucks by SethJohnson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    but he's living in a kind of prison right now, anyway. his freedom is highly restricted. plus, well, russia is a shit-hole.

    I don't entirely disagree with you here. I do think he has untapped earning potential in Russia, though. If he can get a long-term work visa, there are any number of Russian (Kaspersky as an example) and overseas security consulting firms who would vanity hire him as a security auditor. He was making $200k per year as a contractor for the NSA and I expect he could fetch that or more from a company looking to raise their profile in the security industry. Heck, look at Kevin Mitnick. And that guy was a newb compared to Snowden. I expect $200k per year probably supports a more lavish lifestyle in Russia than it did when Snowden was living in Hawaii.

    Since 2000, Mitnick has been a paid security consultant, public speaker and author. He does security consulting for Fortune 500 companies, performs penetration testing services for the worldâ(TM)s largest companies and teaches Social Engineering classes to dozens of companies and government agencies. He is the author of a dozen books that have been translated into many languages, including The Art of Deception, The Art of Intrusion, and Ghost in the Wires.

    1. Re:no doubt living in Russia sucks by tibit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Russia is quite like the U.S. when it comes to expanse of the land. There's plenty of superbly beautiful and unspoiled areas in Russia, if that's your thing. If remote work was feasible, he could live in the middle of nowhere just as well as in the middle of a big city. I would not generalize Russia to be a shithole. If you're on the wrong footing with the authorities, you'll fare equally poorly in any "civilized" country.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    2. Re:no doubt living in Russia sucks by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      to be fair, the women I've met from russia and ukraine were amazing knock-out beauties!

      for some reason, I get a lot of 'you might know this person' on linked-in and they often are women from ukraine (more so than russia, for some reason). 95 times out of a 100, they are model-quality in their looks.

      so, being in that region of the world could have its good points... ;)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  12. As a fly, never try to negotiate with the spider by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 2

    Snowden is a very intelligent individual.

    There is no way on this EARTH he can possibly put any trust into the US Government to keep their word irregardless of what they may promise. Even if this isn't BS ( which I suspect it is ) you KNOW one of the conditions will be to provide the USG with the full cache of documents and / or the cessation of any further disclosures contained within said cache. The USG does not like to be embarrassed on the world stage. Not one bit.

    Even IF by some magical amazing miracle the USG keeps their word ( Recall these people spy on their friends / allies and torture anyone to get what they want ) he couldn't return to the US because about half the country has consumed the wrong color Kool-Aid and believes he's a traitor that deserves to die. So even if the USG doesn't do it, they wouldn't have to. They'll let the radicals do it for them.

    I can understand he may be homesick, but returning to the US now will certainly not be the same life he left behind. If he's LUCKY, he'll just sit in prison for the rest of his life.

    Unless . . . . .

    Unless he has something yet unrevealed on the NSA so incredibly damning, that the USG would do anything to prevent its disclosure. That scenario is the only possibility I can think of where these negotiations could potentially prevent any of the usual behavior we've come to expect of the USG as of late.

  13. Obligatory Exploration? by Geste · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On some level, I feel like Snowden has to explore the option to return, if only to make clear his long-stated desire to do so, look for avenues to negotiate, and keep his supporters engaged.

    I am very doubtful, however, that he will be treated fairly given that he committed the unpardonable crime of embarrassing the U.S. government. Obama is clearly petty and pig-headed enough to resist any cries for justice. His mind is made up about a lot of things, this just being one.

    If I were him, though, I'd have to be very nervous anxious about being the guest of such a calculating thug during a time of such geopolitical aggression and uncertainty. I mean Vlad could just order him killed by unknown assailants and then blame the U.S. for the purposes of some minor PR points. He's that kind of guy.

    Dear Edward Snowden. There has been one person telling the truth and that has been you. You have lost pretty much everything and gained nothing. I hope the day comes when you can walk the streets of our misguided country as a free man. Thank you.

    1. Re:Obligatory Exploration? by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      I mean Vlad could just order him killed by unknown assailants and then blame the U.S. for the purposes of some minor PR points. He's that kind of guy.

      I have yet to see bitching about Putin that wasn't either a case of projection, or 'beams and 'motes. He's an authoritarian doosh, but he's not keeping people in gulag's that have been cleared for release for a decade, nor is he busy murdering people on the other side of the planet with robot planes for their political speech. Nor has he supported a coup in Mexico and then all but invited his newly created puppet government into the Warsaw Pact.

      Putin, at his worst day, is a a molehill next to the mountain of American Exceptionalism on it's best day.

  14. All that he needs is an agreement on the charges by CraigCruden · · Score: 2

    If he were returning home (seriously) and not just messing around, all he has to do is come to some agreement on the charges and venue of the trial before arriving back in the US. That is all that is available to him, and the only guarantees that he get. There are plenty of high-power lawyers from prestigious law firms that would handle his case pro-bono because of the exposure, the courts are the courts and they are not going to make changes to them just for him..... the only issue is what the charges would be.... which would be very serious no matter what.

  15. No good options by Headw1nd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's still a goddamn shame that none of the allegedly "neutral" countries had the balls to take him in, but what can you do? The US is scary.

    I don't think the time is yet right for him to come home, the government isn't any friendlier now than when he left and the people are only slightly less apathetic. Without some powerful public figures to support him, he doesn't stand a chance. However with the situation deteriorating in Russia I imagine it would only be a time before he was assassinated or traded back to the US, so he can't well stay there. At least this will shut up the "Why did he run if he really believes in his cause?" crowd - just kidding they'll change the script and keep on going. Always better to make it a referendum on Snowden's character than to actually talk about the real issues.

  16. Leverage by duckintheface · · Score: 2

    Snowden may be using what leverage he has left. He has not yet disclosed all the information he obtained so the US government might cut a deal to avoid further disclosures.

    --
    "He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
    1. Re:Leverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Snowden may be using what leverage he has left. He has not yet disclosed all the information he obtained so the US government might cut a deal to avoid further disclosures.

      If you believe what Snowden has previously said then no. He has already given everything he had to foreign third parties, and he no longer controls the information. Snowden could plead with them not to reveal anything more, but it is out of his hands. That is if you believe him.

  17. Re:Fair and impartial? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What part of "releasing classified documents" doesn't he understand? It's pretty obvious he violated US law. Fair and impartial won't change that outcome.

    It did for Clapper, Alexander, Obama, Cheney, Holder, the CIA and a number of others who broke the Constitution, committed perjury before Congress, violated a number of human rights, tortured and killed people without any legal basis for it, and continued lying about it time after time.

    All of those enemies of the American people and their Constitution and violators of their oath are foaming at their mouth in anticipation of casting the first stone on Snowden who got the priorities of who and what he was supposed to serve right: "classification" does not trump disclosure of crimes against the American People and Constitution.

    It would be a travesty of justice (or rather it is a travesty of justice) that all those go free for their much more severe crimes while Snowden should be prosecuted for uncovering them.

  18. Require cameras by hawguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As part of his re-patriation agreement, he should require cameras to be rolling throughout the entire trial with a live uncensored feed available to any organization that wants it (News organizations, EFF, ACLU, etc). If the government shuts down the cameras for any reason, then the agreement is null and void and the USA guarantees his return to Russia.

    Then the american people can decide if the trial is "fair" -- if the government tries to redact all of the evidence due to national security reasons, then it's hard to see how the trial can be called "fair".

    I realize that the USA will likely ignore the agreement once he's on american soil, but at least it demonstrates that the USA government can't be trusted to abide by its own agreements and it validates Snowden's reason for fleeing to Russia.

  19. Same deal as Petraeus? by duckintheface · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It was annouced today that former General David Patraeus (former head of the CIA, former commander of US forces in Afghanistan) has been allowed to plead guilty to one misdemeanor count of disclosing classified information after providing large amount of secret info to his mistress and biographer. Should Petraeus, who was motivated by vanity and sex, get a better deal than Snowden who was motivated by love of country and his own idealistic morality? I think not.

    --
    "He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
    1. Re:Same deal as Petraeus? by MobSwatter · · Score: 3, Funny

      ES: Hey, I'll let ya get ur hooks in me if you'll be fair.

      US: Sure, we "Promise", you can bet the constitution on it...

    2. Re:Same deal as Petraeus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      General Betray-Us should spend the rest of his life making little rocks out of big rocks at Ft. Leavenworth.

      Ed should be given a ticker tape parade, one hundred billion dollars, and a lifetime exemption for the next ten generations of descendants of all taxation.

    3. Re: Same deal as Petraeus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which won't happen. They'll make an example out of Snowden. He'll die screaming.

    4. Re:Same deal as Petraeus? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Right, where's the American spirit? The General Asshole did it for vanity, fame and money, in short, the American dream. And that idiot Snowden for "love of his country" and "moral values". Fuck that, you gotta monetize that shit! Giving away state secrets for free is so Un-American, you commie bastard!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Same deal as Petraeus? by russotto · · Score: 2

      Snowden is guilty of turning over a detailed review of our internal security apparatus to our national enemies

      I'm not a great fan of the Guardian either, but "national enemies" is going too far.

    6. Re:Same deal as Petraeus? by penguinoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Snowden is guilty of turning over a detailed review of our internal security apparatus to our national enemies

      I know it doesn't look that way, but technically the American public is not an enemy of the USA.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  20. Re:Snowden isn't coming - this is all a ruse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    He did not commit treason you fucking idiot. Actually read the fucking constitution which clearly defines what treason is.

  21. of all the ideas, this is the worst. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Based on historic evidence, the US has absolutely zero intention of honouring a 'fair' and 'impartial' trial. Chelsea manning leaked a video of US soldiers murdering an ambulance of civillians and was gifted 35 years in prison for a largely victimless crime. KSM and about 100 other 'detainees' at guantanamo, although routinely and repeatedly insisted that they face American justice are in fact completely in limbo. the FBI has been caught spying on defense council and fabricating evidence and the US Congress, once they realized a program of torture and forced rendition would open these individuals to american courts and the possibility of acquittal immediately moved to isolate, restrict, and outlaw transport or trial of any detainee in an american court.

    Civil forfeiture entirely usurps legal process in favour of a carte blanche land and property grab in the pursuit of the "war on drugs." Police are routinely found murdering people in suspicious or controversial situations only to never face trial. the financial collapse of 2008 involved some of the largest banks and securities companies committing fraud on a massive scale, and not a single arrest or trial has taken place. So please, Edward, I understand youre homesick for the first few years in a new place but you need to consider the very legitimate possibility that "american justice" is completely and utterly arbitrary and held to no reasonable, impartial international standard. it exists and functions by virtue of its own existence. Martyring yourself wont change anything, wont alter systems like foreign policy or defense at all. You wont face reason. You will be hanged, and then there will be cake and spin to continue insisting the system of american exceptionalism works.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  22. Change of venue by JeffOwl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hold the trial in a neutral location outside the US like Switzerland. It can be based on US law, but under the control of an independent third party. Get agreement that any prison time is spent somewhere with a humane prison system, like Norway.

  23. Pardoned in 2017? by AdamStarks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only way home I can think of for Snowden is if someone like Rand Paul ends up as President (not ideal, but there are worse choices):
    1) He seems to genuinely care about civil rights (is against the Patriot Act, use of drones, government surveillance etc), and this would be an opportunity to put his money where his mouth is
    2) Only a Republican would snub President Obama in such a way

    Fat chance of that happening, though.

  24. Re:Perhaps he sees the writing on the wall in Russ by Rich0 · · Score: 2

    Of course, a fair and impartial trial will also require him to accept a very high likeliness of losing the case, based on the current evidence against him.

    Yup. When the law is immoral, only the immoral are innocent of breaking the law.

  25. "Death Penalty" by Dracos · · Score: 2

    Can we infer from this that the Federal government doesn't consider "suicide by two bullets to the back of the head" capital punishment?

    Because we all know that (or something similarly underhanded) is going to happen.

    Don't do it, Ed.

  26. You won't get fair trial by Nyder · · Score: 2

    Do not come back until we have a complete change of government here in the USA. You will not get a fair trial.

    Our current government is broken, corrupt & vindictive. You hurt them, they want your blood.

    Nothing has changed since you leaked those documents.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  27. Obama should Pardon Snowden by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Whether you think Snowden is a hero or a traitor, I'd say the best political move Obama could make would be to pardon Snowden for any crimes he is accused of committing to date.

    It would effectively silence Snowden as he could come home with the pardon in his pocket, assuming he keeps his mouth shut forever after. If Snowden continued leaks, then Snowden would be easy to turn into the bad guy

    It would avoid a public trial (which would be awkward, assuming the government would even grant one).

    It would avoid accusations of injustice (in case the trial was a secret one in Gitmo, or an unfortunate 'accident' occurred on his flight home).

    Obama should do this after the 2016 election before he leaves office, as the hubbub will settle out and be forgotten by the 2018 midterm election. It would not satisfy Snowden's supporters (who think he should get a ticker tape parade) or his detractors (who think he should be imprisoned forever), but it would effectively halt the leaks and put the problem to bed with a minimum of fuss.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!