Slashdot Mirror


Daylight Saving Time Change On Sunday For N. America

An anonymous reader writes Just a reminder that DST starts this weekend for most of North America. The majority of people feel that DST is a bad idea and want it to stop. If that was done, the main question would then probably be whether to go to Standard time year-round, or "summer" time year-round (more). For the latter, there is some evidence that it helps reduce crime (at least initially); for the former, more northern locations would have sunrise occur 08:30 or later, which would make the morning commute difficult. Some even argue that the U.S. should go to only two timezones. The DST change occurs at the end of March in the EU, so there will be a second round of confusion for trans-Atlantic conference calls then.

55 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. Except Arizona by cashman73 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Except for those in Arizona, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:Except Arizona by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      We"ve been saving daylight for months here in the southern hemisphere.

      Is there a postal address in Phoenix we can send the excess?

  2. The majority? by markalot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > The majority of people feel that DST is a bad idea....

    Do you have a source for this?

    1. Re:The majority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those who dislike it naturally believe that most people agree with them. Those who like it also naturally believe that most people agree with them.

      Either way, we get to have this discussion on slashdot at least twice a year!

    2. Re:The majority? by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Informative

      > The majority of people feel that DST is a bad idea....

      Do you have a source for this?

      Listening to perople bitch about it this time of year is a good one. But this also works... http://www.timeanddate.com/tim... See "Losing U.S. popularity - According to a Rasmussen Report from 2013, only 37 % of Americans see the purpose of DST compared to 45 % the year before."

    3. Re:The majority? by paiute · · Score: 5, Funny

      we get to have this discussion on slashdot at least twice a year!

      Good thing, too - t's the only way I remember to set my clocks.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    4. Re:The majority? by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      How about this one? 77% in favor of abolishing it. I believe that constitutes a majority.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    5. Re:The majority? by nukenerd · · Score: 2

      Yeah, most people ....... still have to waste time adjusting to [DST], though. ...... Only morning people actually like it, because they get to be extra smug for the following week while their co-workers, friends, and neighbors adjust.

      Adjust ? Perhaps it is different in the US, but in the UK I can honestly say that I have never heard anyone complain that they found it hard to "adjust". They might complain about the flaff to adjust their clocks, but that is about it.

      The change only affects Sunday, and I and most people don't give a shit about the time on a Sunday morning. I just get up when I wake up. You then have a whole day to "adjust", if you need it.

    6. Re:The majority? by zippthorne · · Score: 2

      The period where you're claiming to benefit form savings time, you're actually under standard time....

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re: The majority? by brunnegd · · Score: 2

      You hit the nail on the head. The reason we have DST is cultural, because most people are like you, they have always had DST. It has nothing to do with energy savings, as studies have shown this to be false. I have lived 38 years without DST, 31 years with DST. I much prefer ST all year round.

    8. Re:The majority? by Hussman32 · · Score: 2

      I remember working at a semiconductor manufacturer that had a flex-time policy. We were allowed to show up before 8:00 and leave after 5:00.

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
  3. Except Saskatchewan by Lirodon · · Score: 2

    Although I don't think Canadians are insensitive clods.

  4. Keep it as is by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    DST is not a bad idea. Who the hell is going to wake up at 4:00 a.m. in June? Who is going to do anything enjoyable or productive in the wee hours of the morning when they've still got a looming commute to work?

    Stop all the damned whining and enjoy the sunlight while you're actually awake.

    1. Re:Keep it as is by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      DST is nothing more than collectively agreeing that we will get up and go home an hour earlier all summer long. Hence the traditional opposition in farming areas - farmers work on the sun, not the clock, and if every store closes an hour earlier, it is more difficult for them to get there after the farm work is done but before they close.

    2. Re:Keep it as is by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      farmers work on the sun, not the clock, and if every store closes an hour earlier, it is more difficult for them to get there after the farm work is done but before they close.

      By that same token, if the store shuts 1 hours earlier, they are then losing their customers who are farmers. So it would behoove them to stay open an hour later and make the money the would otherwise lose.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  5. I farking hate the time change by Snotnose · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The older I get the longer it takes me to re-adjust my internal clock. Pick one or the other and stick to it.

  6. Most want it stopped? by jader3rd · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought the problem was that half of all people still think that it's doing them some good.

  7. Exception to the exception to the exception by jabberw0k · · Score: 4, Informative

    Except the Navajo Nation within Arizona, which goes observes Daylight Time, except the Hopi Nation within the Navajo Reservation which doesn't.

    1. Re:Exception to the exception to the exception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Hopi know that cutting one end off a blanket and sewing it on the other end doesn't create a longer blanket.

    2. Re:Exception to the exception to the exception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      except in my house in the hopi nation, which does. except for my sons room in my home, which doesnt. i dont know if his caged gerbil observes it.

    3. Re:Exception to the exception to the exception by techno-vampire · · Score: 3

      I live in California and am stuck observing it whether I want to or not. Our cats, however, ignore it completely.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  8. Re:Oh really? by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.timeanddate.com/tim...
    "Losing U.S. popularity - According to a Rasmussen Report from 2013, only 37 % of Americans see the purpose of DST compared to 45 % the year before."

  9. Re:I don't generally complain about articles... by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One flick of your mouse scroll-wheel finger. That's what it takes for you to disregard an article that you don't care about. An article which - while having been conducted before - opens discussion of human timekeeping practices, which do impact IT issues.

    Not everything in the universe is specifically for you.

    --
    "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
  10. No time zones, no DST, centons by duckintheface · · Score: 5, Informative

    The easiest solution is to have one time worldwide. Essentially, use the military Zulu time (Greenwich Mean Time) for everything. Then there is no confusion about what time it is and international (and coast to coast) communication would be simplified.

    And while we are at it, let's eliminate the 24 hr day and 60 minute hour which are based on Sumerian arithmetic. Let's use digital (base 10) time. The primary unit would be the Centon (1/100th of a planetary rotation) which would mean there would be 100 Centons in a day and each would be equal to about 15 of your puny Earthling minutes. Millons would then be equivalent to 1.5 minutes and the new second (.001 Centons) would be about the same as the existing second. Easy to deal with.

    The issue of daylight would be dealt with locally. Shops and offices would open at whatever time they choose (just like they do now) but it would probably be the equivalent of the old 8AM or 9AM.

    There. I've solved it for you, so no further discussion is necessary. :)

    --
    "He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
    1. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by fisted · · Score: 2

      Sounds good. Where do I sign up?

    2. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The easiest solution is to have one time worldwide.

      Does that really make it easier? Seems like it just exchanges one problem for another. You might know what "time" it is everywhere, but you don't know when they're working, sleeping, etc.
      "What time is it in China? Oh right, 3pm, same as us. Wait, when do they sleep? Can I call there now?"
      "What, we're having dinner at 2am? And tomorrow we travel to India for an afternoon meeting. When will that be? 9:30? WTF?"

    3. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by duckintheface · · Score: 2

      It's easier because when you schedule that call to China, there will be no confusion about what time is agreed upon. And it won't be dinner at 2AM. It will be dinner at 14 (Centons).

      --
      "He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
    4. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      At the very least..for the US.

      Why don't we just pick one time DST or Regular...and stick with it. I think I've been reading that the change in times has been shown pretty readily that it takes a bad toll on our health. People die because of the changes even....

      Nothing wrong with timezones, that make sense, but it makes no sense in this day in age (we're not all farmers anymore)..to shift the day back and forth twice a year by an hour.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      The problem with DST is the way we implementing it. When you do a "Fall? Fall back!" nobody complains about having an extra hour to sleep. "Spring? Spring forward!" Sucks for everyone. They are all grumpy because they lost an hour of sleep.

      So my solution would be, instead of turning clocks ahead an hour in the spring, turn them back 23 hours. That day is wasted. Gone.

      Try again later. "User error. Please replace user and try again."

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    6. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by Macrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does that really make it easier? Seems like it just exchanges one problem for another. You might know what "time" it is everywhere, but you don't know when they're working, sleeping, etc."

      You don't know that now.

      You just assume that everyone is on your schedule.

    7. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by zenaida_valdez · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sounds good. Where do I sign up?

      Set your Wayback Machine for the French Revolution, Paris, France, 5 October 1793. The French National Convention issued the proclamation: XI. Le jour, de minuit à minuit, est divisé en dix parties, chaque partie en dix autres, ainsi de suite jusqu’à la plus petite portion commensurable de la durée.

      There are clocks in French museums with 10 hours in a day, 100 minutes in an hour and 100 seconds in a minute.

    8. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by Kokuyo · · Score: 2

      What makes you think DST makes sense for farmers? Do you think the cows give a rat's ass about DST? Their schedule is linked to the moment the sun reaches it's highest point and nothing else.
      No farmer was ever in favor of DST...

    9. Re: No time zones, no DST, centons by JWW · · Score: 3, Funny

      Annnnnd you've Godwinned a thread on daylight savings time.

      Nice.

      Of course the GP post is ridiculous. Want your base 10 time, move back to the twelve colonies.

    10. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by tresho · · Score: 2

      Does that really make it easier? Seems like it just exchanges one problem for another. You might know what "time" it is everywhere, but you don't know when they're working, sleeping, etc."

      You don't know that now.

      You just assume that everyone is on your schedule.

      People I have known, who worked the night shift, would sometimes be tormented by acquaintances who habitually called them (and woke them up from a sound sleep) at 1100, and who would then make the feeble excuse "I forgot you were a day sleeper." One ingenious 3rd shift worker I knew dealt with the worst offenders by calling their house at 0300 and then saying "Oh, I forgot you were a night sleeper." When I worked the 3rd shift I shut off the ringer on my phone, let my answering machine handle calls, and did not answer knocks on the door.

    11. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by gizmo71 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The issue of daylight would be dealt with locally.

      The issue of date on the other hand becomes a whole lot more awkward. You either have the date change at 00:00 everywhere, which means that for much of the world it changes during the day (it's my birthday! but only until lunchtime!), or in the middle of the night locally, meaning that now I know what time it is anywhere in the world but no idea what date it is.

      That would seem to be a harder problem than simply agreeing times in UTC, which we could do today, and people just doing the conversion to/from their local time as necessary.

      And don't even get me started on people who thing that GMT is the same as UK time all year long...

    12. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They deal with crops.

      Right. And crops care what time we call it when the sun comes up, right?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    13. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by Plunky · · Score: 2

      since your boss lives in the same locality as you, why don't you just talk to your boss about everybody starting work about an hour after dawn? I'm sure everybody would appreciate waking up with the birds..

    14. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Growing up farming, we didn't care about the time on the clock, the cows had to be dealt with at the same time, the fields were dealt with when they were ready regardless of the time the clock showed. Plowing (prior to the no-till stuff), planting once it was light enough and the conditions right it didn't matter what time the clock said. Hay started about 2-3 hours after sunrise to let the dew dry off for cutting - bailing happened in the afternoons or whenever it was dry (you don't want wet or even damp hay), again the clock didn't matter it was all conditions. If the hay was dry and you could see it was bailing time regardless of the clock.

      The only thing the clock mattered on is what time the stores opened or closed in case something was needed from there.

      Personally I'd vote to keep DST year around.

    15. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by dinfinity · · Score: 2

      and each of them lived in 4-5 different time zones.

      There is a 'yo mamma' joke in here somewhere.

    16. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by Hussman32 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And I assume you'll redefine the second to be 0.864 seconds, and then redefine every physical constant and measurement that has time, force, or energy in it?

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    17. Re:No time zones, no DST, centons by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Without DST where I live, it would get light at like 3:30 or 4 AM. I have no desire to have sunlight streaming into my bedroom at that hour." Clock times are only a social convention. If you don't want sunlight streaming into your bedroom at 0400, simply adjust all your clocks so that it streams in 0800, or you can become a very late riser and make the adjustment so that your room lights up at 1030.

      Or just get a set of room darkening shades. Those will keep the sunlight from streaming in at any hour.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    18. Re: No time zones, no DST, centons by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      If people are that close to the edge then leaving for work an hour earlier / losing an hour's sleep is only a proximate cause to their death.

      The root cause is that they were leading a fucked-up life and were susceptible to a final straw. Now, whether any given individual's life is fucked up due to their own choices or not probably runs the gamut from 0 to 1 on probability distribution.

      Perhaps the few percent who get a heart attack the week of the hour change might be on the edge. But there are other effects.

      Like how accident rates go up 5% the following week (somehow no one's clamoring for the DST-insurance company conspiracy yet). Which given everyone's always more tired, means an increased risk of getting involved in an accident which can kill you. Perhaps the sleepy texter whose already having a hard enough time seeing the screen blows through the red and right into you. Oddly enough, while they got hit from the front, you got hit from the side, meaning she's more likely to survive, and you, either serious injury or death. All because their eyes couldn't focus on the words on the screen.

      Not to mention, it was bright the week before during the commute, now it's dark again. Behaviors don't change all that much.- people will be less cautious because a week ago, they could do it just fine and see traffic.

      And as someone who commutes in at 6AM just before the rush, having it bright outside is nice. IF I wanted the bright light to commute, that would put me smack in the middle of rush, and make my commute take twice as long.

    19. Re: No time zones, no DST, centons by jafiwam · · Score: 2

      If people are that close to the edge then leaving for work an hour earlier / losing an hour's sleep is only a proximate cause to their death.

      The root cause is that they were leading a fucked-up life and were susceptible to a final straw. Now, whether any given individual's life is fucked up due to their own choices or not probably runs the gamut from 0 to 1 on probability distribution.

      Excuse me. I know you inner city trash don't have to deal with this.

      However, us drivin' folk in flyover states need to deal with the sun as it affects VISIBILITY.

      See, that thing you see between the buildings and through the smog and smoke called "the sun", when it gets low (behind buildings) it reflects off the road pavement, or sometimes ice and snow, and gets in one's eyes. I know you can't see it then, but it really does this.

      Going to work (in a car, not a train or a subway or a bus) during one week of the year is more hazardous due to bad visibility during peak traffic times due to the sun being low on the horizon (that's "skyline", to you city slickers) because the low sun and reflective pavement obscure vision and shorten the distance available to react. It also makes it harder to discern the markings on the roads. This peak traffic accident week happens once a year regardless. Daylight savings time makes it happen TWICE a year.

  11. Don't Keep it as is by freeze128 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here in Minnesota, we have large stores like Mills Fleet Farm and Wal-Mart that have extended hours, if not open 24 hours, and stock items that typical farmers need for maintaining Livestock and doing various repairs. This can also be supplemented with Amazon orders that can be delivered directly to your home. There is an ever decreasing need for DST changes just to support farmers. Also, we have had the electric light for more than 100 years now. I think it's time to change. Farmers will be able to adapt. If they can't, then maybe they should be replaced with robots.

  12. brain-damaged simplicity boners by epine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    an hour earlier

    An hour earlier than what?

    Humans have been phase-locked to the mean solar day for just over 200 out of the last 6 million years.

    1883: Railroads create the first time zones

    Not even the sun is phase-locked to mean solar time. There's this little detail called the Equation of time whose discovery dates back to the Babylonians, which governs annual variation in apparent solar time. Apparent solar time just happens to be the primary zeitgeber on circadian rhythmicity in all mammals (that I've heard of) and a great deal more.

    The majority of people feel that DST is a bad idea and want it to stop.

    Majority of what population? People living north of the 49th? I doubt it.

    Majority of people who wish pi was equal to 3 and that the earth's orbit were circular? Almost certainly, even though I don't think these two simplicity boners are conceptually compatible.

  13. Re:I don't generally complain about articles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Considering how important time is for a computer and people writing code for them, the hassle of dealing with timezones, daylight savings time, and even the occasional leap second is something that most programmers need to know to varying degrees at some point. If you don't care about hour-scale precision, I suppose it won't matter much, but if you do, it's quite a twisty maze to figure out what the time would have been called locally in a particular year and location. That's why there are whole libraries written to deal with it.

    For example, it was a challenge for programmers when the rules for DST switchover changed a few years ago (2007). Plenty of code was badly written to handle it because the rules were hard-coded. I still have a few old, impossible-to-update machines around that are always off by an hour 4 times a year unless manually set. Those machines don't know about the new DST switchover date, so they ignore it in spring, then they switch on the date of the old DST switchover (manually reset again), and then the whole thing happens again in the fall the other way around.

    It's a lesson in bad coding and how to do it wrong, and every time the rules change it's yet another annoyance, which is why some people are saying "screw the whole thing". Which will be another thing to change in the code :-(

    If we ever do invent time travel, I figure it's going to be routine for people to show up from the future for important historical events and discover they're an hour off.

  14. Re:Meaningless debate by DamonHD · · Score: 2

    And changing our entire frame of reference twice a year in some places at vaguely similar but not the same dates, to me does not meet that test.

    We have things called computers and calendars these days with which we could adjust the running hours of our businesses, schools, etc, *if necessary* to the seasons.

    My local graveyard manages it.

    I run as much as possible on UTC.

    Rgds

    Damon

    --
    http://m.earth.org.uk/
  15. Which is Irrelevant by pubwvj · · Score: 2

    It doesn't matter which we go with, let's just pick one and stick with it year round. The natural cycles make it so that sunrise and sunset change dramatically from December to June. They can't legislate away the tilt of the Earth so let's start by accepting nature and science and do away with this nonsense of changing the clocks.

  16. Internet of things by zippthorne · · Score: 2

    I try to make sure that the only clocks I have are connected to the internet other automatically adjusted sources - computer, cell phone, DVR, "atomic" radio clock, etc. If it's not connected to the internet or some other source for updating time zone data (because, not only do we need to change the time twice a year, we need to change when we do it, too, and differently depending on location), then I try to buy one that doesn't have a clock so I don't need to bother.

    The only clock I still need to adjust that I don't just ignore is my car radio. Do new cars have internet-connected clock/radios?

    Despite this great convenience of automatically adjusting clocks, DST is still stupid.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:Internet of things by Geeky · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My car has inbuilt sat nav and I still have to adjust the time manually twice a year. It knows exactly where I am, but can't relate that to a timezone, let alone sync time to the GPS signal. Or the digital radio. Or my phone when that's connected via bluetooth. It's weird that it seems to have multiple data sources that could potentially keep the time accurate but doesn't use any of them.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  17. Re:I pick Summer time by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

    I love the late day sun in the Summer. In Winter, dark is dark, who cares.

    Well, then, let's stick the the DST hours...and freeze it there..then summers would have late hours.

    I lived in AZ and the lack of changing hours didn't affect anything poorly, in fact, it was nice to never have to twice a year have your sleep cycle all screwed up for days and have to re-adjust.

    I just think in this day in age, it really makes no sense for the majority of the US to have to switch back and forth twice annually.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  18. Re:how about something more radical by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    The rest of the world uses metric time?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  19. Re:It's just my opinion but, by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

    I think DST is a crime against nature

    This. I think the current idea of time zones is somewhat OK to keep things convenient, but the reference should always be solar time, where 12 at noon means the sun at its highest point. If someone has a better way of defining time, I'm all ears, but arbitrarily moving/renaming things around is no way to standardize them. In fact, we might as well rename current hours as foo, bar, quux, etc. to indicate their complete detachment from nature, logic and math. Physical units strive for independent, natural definitions, and I don't think clock time deserves anything less.

    Of course, there's the obligatory argument with early birds: if you want to wake up one hour earlier, then please do, by all means. I think you can do that without messing with my and nature's time.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  20. The Naked Sun by westlake · · Score: 2

    I am reminded how Elijah Baley was reduced to tears and asking whether the sun would be out when he landed on Solaria. The Naked Sun

    I don't find the geek's willingness to divorce himself from the natural cycle of day and night and the change of seasons particularly healthy --- nor do I share his obsession with reducing everything to base 10.

  21. Re:Classic Slow News Day article or what? by KiloByte · · Score: 3

    Except that ntp doesn't handle time zones at all. What ntp does is synchronizing clocks to UTC, the operating system then adds a local offset. While distributing whatever changes to tzdata your politicians in their wisdom did this year (or worse, this week) is an interesting problem, it has nothing in common with ntp.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.