Slashdot Mirror


Make Those Brown Eyes Blue

randomErr writes A new procedure has been developed that can turn any brown eye to blue. The procedure uses a laser that disturbs the melanin in the pigmented part of the eye. Over the course of a few weeks your body would eliminate the disturbed pigment revealing the blue layer below all people have. The procedure costs about $5,000 and only takes a few second to complete. You can't get it yet in the U.S. because it still going through clinical trials and some ophthalmologists fear that process could increase pressure in the eyes.

208 comments

  1. Godwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hitler would approve...

    1. Re: Godwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      There isn't actually a "blue layer," it's just a lack of pigment.

    2. Re: Godwin by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      AIUI, the blue is caused by refraction and all other colors by pigments.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Godwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitler would approve...

      Hitler really didn't care about what color your anus was. Note to the writer- consider the meaning of the phrase "brown eye" and be a little more careful next time you try to construct a sentence about actual eyeballs.

    4. Re:Godwin by umghhh · · Score: 1

      Not sure why parent is being demoted - that is one way Nazis could react to this sort of fake aryans. OTOH there is no regime on this earth that does not like to dispense certificates for money.

    5. Re:Godwin by johnsnails · · Score: 1
    6. Re: Godwin by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nope. Only brown eyes are caused directly by pigments. Blue eyes and green eyes actually don't exist per se: there is no blue or green pigment. Blue eyes look blue for the same reason the sky looks blue: Rayleigh scattering. Green eyes, much more rare, are in-between, and don't even look green in certain lights or certain angles.

    7. Re: Godwin by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Light (enough) brown is yellow. Blue plus yellow is green. Green eyes is blue eyes with threads/whisps of brown in them. From far back, they are green. Close up, they are blue in back, and light brown in front. And yes, the kids have green eyes. One more blue than green. The other more green than anything else.. Mine are grey (blue in back, white wisps in front, makes a blue/grey look). The wife has brown eyes.

      The lights/angles/surrounding colors make a difference. I've heard mood does as well, but haven't been able to see or cause any changes that way.

  2. Filed under... by kuzb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...things not worth $5000

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    1. Re:Filed under... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      Indeed. Stupid ways to spend $5K ...

      * Laser Blue Eye Surgery
      * Watches

    2. Re:Filed under... by BoRegardless · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And people with blue eyes get more eye damage from bright sunlight.

      Messing with my eyes is not my idea of being safe.

    3. Re:Filed under... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      You could easily spend more than $5000 getting braces or plastic surgery.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    4. Re:Filed under... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      How do you know?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Braces actually fix something.
      But they're outdated. That invisi-whatever is more effective and now cheaper.

    6. Re:Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Alex, what is... a year of feeling like a princess paying $5 for $0.50 coffees at Starbucks?

    7. Re: Filed under... by Evtim · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bull. I got a simple Seiko for 400 euro. Ti casing, sapphire window, kinetic, simple and elegant. Booklet says 10 sec per month deviation. I timed it over 6 months - 1.5 seconds. So, how much more accurate the 20k watch would be? Is it worth the extra cost? I don't think so...

    8. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Casio probably beats that.

    9. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're referring to Invisalign, and the treatment costs 5 grand.

    10. Re: Filed under... by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are completely missing the point here troll. You arrogant assumption is that watches are for keeping time. PATHETIC. You show your lack of class with every word.

      They are most certainly NOT. If I want to know the time, I will ask some gimp like you.

      They are for:
        - "Reading the time" at the appropriate moment to show a new acquaintance how wealthy and fashionable you are.
        - Indicate to ladies that they too could have such expensive gifts if they sleep with you. (lol - yeah right!!)
        - Making other people like yourself but less wealthy jealous.
        - A conversation piece - although make sure you PRETEND not to care how good it is why showing it off.
        - Striking poses involving your wrist near you head for that glamour photo. (this is no joke and requires hours of practice in front of a mirror)

      You watch does not even need batteries or be wound to do these thing!?

      So you see how pathetic you are?

      "Watches are for reading the time". PLLEEEEAAASSSSEEE....

    11. Re: Filed under... by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I did not know what to buy to have finally some success.

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    12. Re:Filed under... by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      $1825 for a year of fancy coffee, instead of $5000 for blue eyes of -1 protection from sunlight.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    13. Re:Filed under... by UncleTogie · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...things not worth $5000

      ....unless you're a criminal trying to change your identity...

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    14. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Braces actually fix something.

      Wel...l it sounds like this fixes brown eyes.

    15. Re:Filed under... by Spugglefink · · Score: 1

      ....unless you're a criminal trying to change your identity...

      Or a fake blonde going the extra mile to fake being natural.

    16. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. I have a fancy Seiko that some gave me as a gift and I never wear it because it's crap compared to my $10 Timex.

    17. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like Snoop Dog says in his song: "The G-Code"

      "First you get the bitches, then you get the power, then you get the money."

    18. Re: Filed under... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Bull. I got a simple Seiko for 400 euro.

      I got a simple Casio for ten dollars. Keeps time at least as well as your Seiko and as a nice side benefit it's a nice gitmo talking point. (Yes, that's really truly the watch I own.) As a side benefit, if it gets damaged, lost, stolen etc., I don't care.

      Your watch is a bracelet. It's jewelry, and being a watch is secondary.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Filed under... by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is plastic surgery (reconstructive surgery)and a subset is cosmetic surgery.
      I had plastic surgery, I had a cyst on my jaw line that was infected. So a plastic surgeon removed it in a way that it didn't scar or damage all the nerves in my face.
      Then there is cosmetic surgery where people get procedures done for no medical reason other to match what is currently fationable.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    20. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia says "a typical quartz clock or wristwatch will gain or lose 15 seconds per 30 days". My Casio W-753V-2AVEF is around that (it certainly was not their most expensive general public watch, but not their cheapest either...). It's currently a minute in advance, after I set it back again to my computer time (which is less than 2ms apart from five stratum 2 NTP servers) a few months ago.

      Of course, I wouldn't spend much more on a watch, not having much technical use of it, even though I like precision (my next one will probably be a radio-controlled one, though... it certainly would be much more satisfying to me than moon phases or tides, being far from the sea...).

    21. Re: Filed under... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I did not know what to buy to have finally some success.

      What about a second wife?

      Or those stupid plastic coffee capsules.

      Before I went to bed I saw the story here about how someone sold them for $50 000 to a company selling (or making?) billions of it.

      Still a nasty product though, as thought the inventor.

    22. Re: Filed under... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Your watch is a bracelet. It's jewelry, and being a watch is secondary.

      While your's is one of "Hey I'm much superior and better than those other guys who purchase expensive watches! Weak minds!"

    23. Re:Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this helps a person's self confidence, and perception, that person may well make back the $5000 in short order.

    24. Re:Filed under... by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      "Honey, do you even know what color my eyes are?"

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    25. Re: Filed under... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      While your's is one of "Hey I'm much superior and better than those other guys who purchase expensive watches! Weak minds!"

      No, my watch is a superior watch. Their watch is a superior bracelet. To each their own, just don't lie to yourself about what you're buying, that's dumb.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re: Filed under... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What on earth makes you think the quality of a watch is about it's ability to keep precise time?

      A $20000 certified Swiss chronometer has a typical accuracy of +/- 2 second per day. That is an accuracy easily beaten by a $10 wrist watch from a chemist.

      Watches are jewelry.

    27. Re: Filed under... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      My cellphone is more accurate than any of these watches, since it syncs to the towers. And it doesn't cost me a dime, since I already pay for it for communications use; the timekeeping feature is just a bonus. Plus, I don't have to have some annoying thing strapped to my wrist.

    28. Re:Filed under... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      It's not necessarily to match "what is currently fashionable"": lots of studies have found that there is an objective measure of beauty in humans, and that's symmetry. Humans who look more symmetrical are perceived as more attractive; it's hard-wired into our brains as a measure of reproductive fitness. So any plastic surgery to make you look more symmetrical (such as removing moles or other facial blemishes) isn't a matter of fashion, it's a matter of beautification according to our biological preferences.

      Now, something like a nose job to make your nose smaller or pointer is definitely a fashion thing, as a preference for big clown noses vs. small pointy noses is likely either a matter of fashion, or of culture.

    29. Re: Filed under... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      No, my watch is a superior watch. Their watch is a superior bracelet. To each their own, just don't lie to yourself about what you're buying, that's dumb.

      _I_ have a 150 SEK dumb phone with a shitty watch built in.

      I didn't even paid for it myself (was it 250 SEK unlocked? Maybe it was 99 SEK locked?)

      You have an unnecessary piece of plastic and electronically junk around your wrist which perform a task your phone do and beyond.

      Some of them have hand-made mechanical artworks! ;D

    30. Re:Filed under... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Perfectly symmetrical faces look weird. Try it in your favourite image editor.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    31. Re:Filed under... by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

      No, they don't. There've been a bunch of studies where they take a bunch of people's faces, merge them all together in an image editor, then show the various faces plus the merged face to a group of people, and the merged person (who the participants don't know isn't a real person) is consistently rated most attractive.

    32. Re: Filed under... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      definition of a good watch is one that will impress someone with money. it has nothing to do with how accurate it is.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    33. Re:Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My girlfriend absolutely hates, above all things, the fact that she has brown eyes, I don't know why, but I'm sure she will be one of the first people in line when the procedure is approved.

    34. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How accurate it is at impressing people with money?

    35. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, but less likely to go snow blind.

    36. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mobile phone (stop calling it a "cell" phone, it sounds stupid and gives you away as an American) also won't last for ten years on a single battery. I would hazard to guess that it isn't as durable, portable or convenient.

    37. Re: Filed under... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I *am* an American, you moron. Sorry if you don't like that. I never claimed it was the greatest place in the world anyway, I just live here. And "cellphone" is much shorter and faster to say (and type) than "mobile phone". And if you drop the "phone" part, you end up with "mobile", which is a toy you hang over babies' cribs.

      I really don't give a shit about a watch lasting 10 years on a battery. Why is that important? It's not like I'm going to be stuck somewhere away from civilization for 10 years. For portability, phones are portable enough, and I never leave home without mine since they're so critically important now. For convenience, the same applies: I always have my phone. Maybe it takes slightly longer to see the time, but it's not like I need to look at the time that often, and my internal timekeeping is good enough I usually know what time it is anyway, within 15 minutes or so. For durability, again I take my phone everywhere, and it seems to be durable enough. If it gets smashed, I have much bigger concerns than not seeing exactly what time it is.

    38. Re: Filed under... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Let me get my solid gold ruler and see...

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    39. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wives are far more expensive than that and you should factor in the costs to dispose of one or both of them if they don't get along and lawyer fees to fend off polygamy charges.

    40. Re: Filed under... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Wives are far more expensive than that and you should factor in the costs to dispose of one or both of them if they don't get along and lawyer fees to fend off polygamy charges.

      What? Polygamy is illegal?
      Why? Unfair? Christianity? In the US?

      The idea of shared economy I guess is just bull-shit. Could had just been a sign of love.

      Then again of one don't want to form an economic unit one could just not marry at all but I understood in the US if you for instance get a kid with someone you're not married too that child for whatever reason isn't assumed to be yours "as much" / with the same rights just because you're not married? (This was in the case of citizenship.)

      "Because the Greeks and Romans had only wife partner so shall we!"

      It suck in modern societies.

      Sure if every couple get 4 children of which two are women and men always marry one generation younger women then there's women to go around.

      In a one couple - two children scenario where you marry people of the same age though you'll obviously run out of women if there's 1 women for every 1 man.

    41. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the definition of a good watch is how well it keeps time, how durable it is, how many features it has and how maintenance-free it is.

    42. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *am* an American, you moron.

      Well then I guess calling you a moron back would be a compliment. Morons have higher IQs than Americans.

      I just live here. And "cellphone" is much shorter and faster to say (and type) than "mobile phone".

      Oh yes, those two additional letters must be such a pain for your culture of laziness.

      And if you drop the "phone" part, you end up with "mobile", which is a toy you hang over babies' cribs.

      Funny, because everyone in the world, aside from you Americans, say "mobile" and nobody gets it confused. That might be because English speakers understand a little thing called "context". Perhaps your mangled American language doesn't take that into account.

      I really don't give a shit about a watch lasting 10 years on a battery. Why is that important?

      Because it's practically zero maintenance, while you have to plug your phone in every twelve hours or so just to have the time.

      For portability, phones are portable enough, and I never leave home without mine since they're so critically important now.

      Try going for a run or dancing with your phone flipping around in your pocket...oh right, I forgot, you Americans don't exercise.

      For convenience, the same applies: I always have my phone.

      Yes, having to fumble around your pockets to take out your phone, hold it up to your face and press a button for the display to come on is so much easier than flicking your wrist a half inch to see the time.

      For durability, again I take my phone everywhere, and it seems to be durable enough. If it gets smashed, I have much bigger concerns than not seeing exactly what time it is.

      You must not have many important things to do then. Knowing the time is the single most important thing to know when doing business, keeping appointments or meeting up with friends. A decent watch is nearly indestructible.

      LOL, Americans.

    43. Re: Filed under... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      It depends what you're doing with it. On the rare occasion I wear a watch it's for keeping time for celestial navigation. Keeping very accurate time is it's only function. I hear people with nothing better to do often wear jewellery to impress each other though.

    44. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and actually fixes something worth fixing

    45. Re: Filed under... by kuzb · · Score: 1

      You're not fixing it if it's not broken.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    46. Re:Filed under... by kuzb · · Score: 1

      If the color of your eyes is damaging your self confidence, you have bigger problems.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    47. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $10 Timex, luxury!

    48. Re: Filed under... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You have an unnecessary piece of plastic and electronically junk around your wrist which perform a task your phone do and beyond.

      Nah, I don't even wear it unless I actually need a watch. I have a Moto G, whose smartphone features I use all the time, and it's what I take with me when I go out. The watch was actually a gift from my father. But I'm pretty sure he paid around ten bucks for it, he was a cheapskate. It still works, many years on, and it's still a good watch.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    49. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sick and tired of people, jealous of America, that try to make themselves feel better about their pissy little country by bashing, bashing, bashing. Just piss off.

    50. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you probably wear a belt with your suspenders then. I carry one device that is capable of reporting the time. Oh, it is my phone, cell, mobile, whatever. There is another one in my bigass SUV that I use for getting to meetings when I need to. After all, I amAmerican. But the reality is that most people like you that I need to meet with come to see me. So hurry along now, you don't want to be late.

    51. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that knowing the time is the single most important thing to know when "doing business," you are undoubtedly very successful (at selling antiquated timepieces perhaps?)

    52. Re: Filed under... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Ok, what shitty country do you hail from? I'm sure I can come up with lots of generalizations about it. Germany = Nazis, French = cowards, etc.

    53. Re:Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fraudsters. You wil extinguish us blue eyed people.

    54. Re: Filed under... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making other people like yourself but less wealthy jealous.

      You mean envious, not jealous. Even pretentious people don't know the difference.

    55. Re:Filed under... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Try making the face symmetrical vertically not horizontally.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    56. Re: Filed under... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Your mobile phone (stop calling it a "cell" phone, it sounds stupid and gives you away as an American) also won't last for ten years on a single battery.

      American English is spoken outside the USA. In Australia and other places, you'll hear it called a "cell phone" more often than a mobile. Though, when posting on line, they tend to write "mobile" because of the British English pricks that whinge every time someone uses an American expression, even if it's more widely used than the archaic British English version.

      And I have more than one cell phone that's over 10 years old, and still on a single battery.

    57. Re:Filed under... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That sounds like the merged face will clear blemishes. Perhaps if you merged the faces, keeping, or increasing the blemishes on any one face, you'd get the opposite result, proving it was a study on blemishes, not symmetry.

    58. Re:Filed under... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but Cindy Crawford used to be considered a raving beauty and she had a prominent mole.

    59. Re:Filed under... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      they take a bunch of people's faces, merge them all together in an image editor, then show the various faces plus the merged face to a group of people

      I realise English isn't your first language, but why do you think merging is the same as making them symmetrical?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    60. Re: Filed under... by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 1

      For the sake of argument, in Australia we (mostly - in Sydney area) still call them mobile phones. But we have American TV, so we understand 'cell phone' also, and many other americanisms, and stuff from other languages.
      On the other hand, I do not see what the intent was pointing out that cell phone is am American term. Either way, it was understood, right? There's lots of words for, say, 'sex' too, that often vary by locale, however most people seem to relish knowing as many alternatives to that term as they can, rather than insisting their local name is the only correct one. (Aussies locally claim 'root' as our slang term, among others)
      I guess as an Aussie who has travelled the world a fair amount, and speaks a smattering of other languages (none very well, mind you) I recognise that the 'English' we speak here in Australia has so many words and terms from so many other languages that it's idiotic to argue which word label is best, and to ignore languages idiosyncrasies except when directly discussing language itself.
      Sure, if you don't understand the word/term used, ask a question, but if you do understand, what is the gain in patronising the other uselessly, and possibly (depending on perspective) inaccurately?
      When I lived in the USA, I occasionally called them 'mobiles' but the consistent blank looks from the Americans I was talking to taught me to call them 'cells' while I was there, even though I had to pause every time I used the word in a sentence, as it was always 'mobile' in my head.

      But nice to see a discussion about eye colour turn into a "My english is better than your english" competition :)

      --
      "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
    61. Re: Filed under... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      But does anyone actually call it a mobile phone? I hear the Australians call it a "mow-bile", without saying phone.

    62. Re: Filed under... by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we rarely say 'phone', we're Aussies, don't use more words (or syllables) than required to be understood (or partly understood, if not talking to another Aussie).
      I personally do often call it a 'mobile phone' as a compromise when speaking to my American friends, however.
      (I lived a while in the USA, and I think between work and friends, I talk to Americans more than Aussies, most days)

      --
      "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
  3. Frankly, fuck shit like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's no need for it. At all. It serves no medical good.

    1. Re: Frankly, fuck shit like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the summary and assumed it was targeted at folks with different coloured eyes. Sure it only works if you have one blue one brown but seemed logical enough that some people born that way might have the desire and money to get them matching.

    2. Re: Frankly, fuck shit like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better mental health is a sound "medical good" (less anxiety perhaps) in my book.

    3. Re: Frankly, fuck shit like this. by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      heterochromia is so sexy. like kate bosworth.

    4. Re: Frankly, fuck shit like this. by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Why would one with Bowie eyes want to change that? That would be rather cool to have.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    5. Re: Frankly, fuck shit like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bowie eyes can be had too. After all his is the result of a treatment for an injury. Permanent dilation is why one of his eyes is darker. However, they are the same color technically.
      Disclaimer: it's not anyones's fault but your own if you injure yourself.

    6. Re: Frankly, fuck shit like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A punch in the face is free!

      *heterochromia via face punching is not an exact science and may require multiple treatments. We are not responsible for other side effects.

    7. Re:Frankly, fuck shit like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck shit like YOU, telling people what they should and should not look like.

    8. Re: Frankly, fuck shit like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still wasting energy attacking symptoms of the problem. The root of the problem still seems to go unsolved.

    9. Re:Frankly, fuck shit like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He isn't telling you anything about what you should look like. You were made a certain way via natural processes.

      Fucking with your body to satisfy deep faults of self-intolerance is the result of your inability to love yourself as who you are.

      I LOVE YOU!

    10. Re: Frankly, fuck shit like this. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Then you could cause it with this. Which eye would you like blue?

  4. Oh no I'm blind now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did risky surgery for something I could have had with colored contacts! Why?! WHY?!?

    1. Re:Oh no I'm blind now by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      Because people have expensive plastic surgery all the time for no good reason?

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
  5. Sneetches with stars on thars by sphix42 · · Score: 1

    It's like a tattoo that won't come off until the next machine comes along.
    The experience should be something like a face tattoo.

    1. Re:Sneetches with stars on thars by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      There goes my plan for a little Tux logo

  6. Turning Japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I heard about this being developed a long time ago, and when I did, my best friend and I both said this would turn into a gold mine in Japan. They'll go nuts for the ability to give themselves real and for true blue eyes without having to wear contact lenses.

    1. Re:Turning Japanese by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The irony is, of course, that Japanese girls with blue eyes look bizarre and unsettling. I've seen them wearing their colored contact lenses, and it's just a bad look, period. But at least contact lenses come out. This...it's like a tattoo. "Why does 45-year-old Fumiko have those weird eyes?" "Oh, 20 years ago she thought it would be cool. Now she's stuck like that." "Poor woman! Why doesn't she just wear brown contacts?" "The procedure left her with sensitive eyes that can't stand contacts. Unexpected side effect that happens to 23% of people who get the surgery."

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re: Turning Japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll be unsettled at first but maybe get used to after a while ?

    3. Re:Turning Japanese by Pikoro · · Score: 2

      I don't think it would matter much. Japanese already have a social reaction to this which would fill the gap. Tattoos are shunned in public places. This would probably fall along the same lines.

      Dying your hair is also more socially acceptable now, but not in a business setting.

      Besides, a Japanese driver's license doesn't even have a place for hair or eye color. ( I am a permanent resident of Japan and have a Japanese license)

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    4. Re:Turning Japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Japanese girls with their natural dark BROWN eyes.

  7. Modern medical science is amazing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm an older gent (I'm in my late 70s). I've witnessed a lot of change of my life, including the rise of computers and the Internet. But nothing amazes more more than medical science. Here we are, able to turn brown eyes blue. I never would have thought that would be possible during my lifetime. And I've also heard that thanks to modern surgical techniques, it's possible to turn a woman into a man, and a man into a woman. Sometimes the surgery is so effective that it's nearly impossible to tell the difference! Back when I was a young man, if somebody had blue eyes, it's because they always had blue eyes. And if somebody had a penis, it's because they always had a penis. But thanks to advancements in medical science, what I knew to be true when I was a young man is no longer the case now. Brown eyes can become blue. Penises can be surgically crafted, and be indistinguishable from the real thing. Medical science: it's amazing!

    1. Re:Modern medical science is amazing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cool story bro

    2. Re:Modern medical science is amazing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who are you? Dr. Lexus from Idiocracy? "Uhhh... you talk like a fag and your shit's retarded...."

      No, wait, you're a fucking idiot.

    3. Re:Modern medical science is amazing. by gargleblast · · Score: 0
    4. Re: Modern medical science is amazing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first wife was 'tarded. She's a pilot now.

    5. Re:Modern medical science is amazing. by Guppy · · Score: 2

      There's also a drug that can turn blue eyes brown:
      http://io9.com/why-does-this-e...

    6. Re:Modern medical science is amazing. by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Well, yes and no. If you look at Roman Emperors like Augustus and Tiberius they became 75 and 77 years old, respectively and those dates are fairly certain. For sure they're not representative but there were certainly those who lived longer. Looking at modern mortality tables here in Norway some 23% and 27% of the population would already be dead at this age. And 50% will be dead by 85, 90% by 95, 98% by 100. Far fewer people die young, but 2000 years of medicine has bought us maybe 20 years of life span, in fact it seems less likely they'd live to be 95 and 97 today.

      I think that's a bit underwhelming. Even more so because in those final decades you're so old and frail a light breeze will blow you over, the main reason they live longer is basically because they're "bubble wrapped" in a nursery. Can't we invent medicine to rejuvenate the body and I don't mean hair transplants for baldness but to genuinely restore strength, dexterity, endurance and so on? You see it in pretty much all professional sports that depend on physical prowess, around 35 give or take a few they all retire. After that it's all "in good shape for an X year old" but not if you were 20.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:Modern medical science is amazing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite. Penises can be turned into pockets that resemble vaginas. Female-to-male reassignment surgeries are not quite as effective, and they're not completely functional.

    8. Re:Modern medical science is amazing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an older gent (I'm in my late 70s). I've witnessed a lot of change of my life, including the rise of computers and the Internet. But nothing amazes more more than medical science. Here we are, able to turn brown eyes blue. I never would have thought that would be possible during my lifetime. And I've also heard that thanks to modern surgical techniques, it's possible to turn a woman into a man, and a man into a woman. Sometimes the surgery is so effective that it's nearly impossible to tell the difference! Back when I was a young man, if somebody had blue eyes, it's because they always had blue eyes. And if somebody had a penis, it's because they always had a penis. But thanks to advancements in medical science, what I knew to be true when I was a young man is no longer the case now. Brown eyes can become blue. Penises can be surgically crafted, and be indistinguishable from the real thing. Medical science: it's amazing!

      You mean that they can turn men into women, except that they will say they were already women but with the wrong body and the inverse. Me I once heared a guy explain the benefits of a nanocomputer in the human blood stream. He said that this way they could turn each human as he should be: fair haired and with blue eyes. Well, that's the nazi theory.

    9. Re:Modern medical science is amazing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an older gent (I'm in my late 70s). I've witnessed a lot of change of my life, including the rise of computers and the Internet. But nothing amazes more more than medical science. Here we are, able to turn brown eyes blue. I never would have thought that would be possible during my lifetime. And I've also heard that thanks to modern surgical techniques, it's possible to turn a woman into a man, and a man into a woman. Sometimes the surgery is so effective that it's nearly impossible to tell the difference! Back when I was a young man, if somebody had blue eyes, it's because they always had blue eyes. And if somebody had a penis, it's because they always had a penis. But thanks to advancements in medical science, what I knew to be true when I was a young man is no longer the case now. Brown eyes can become blue. Penises can be surgically crafted, and be indistinguishable from the real thing. Medical science: it's amazing!

      Next they will be able to make short people tall so you'll never know who was born short or born tall anymore. Science is a wonderful thing.

    10. Re:Modern medical science is amazing. by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      And vice-versa.

  8. What about turning blue eyes brown? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And is it permanent, or does the brown pigment return eventually?

    1. Re:What about turning blue eyes brown? by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the Sneetches.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  9. How lost these people must be.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To imagine that changing their eye color will make them happier.

    I have brown eyes. Of my 8 great-grandparents, only 1 had brown eyes. Of my 4 grandparents, only 1 had brown eyes. Of my parents, 1 had brown eyes. These are the eyes I was born with and these are the eyes I will die with.

    Of all the things one could change, eye color would be way down on the list. Perhaps someday one will be able to buy intelligence or self-respect.

    1. Re:How lost these people must be.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and these are the eyes I will die with.

      Don't be so sure, the mafia may get interested on you.

    2. Re:How lost these people must be.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To understand this as some 'great quest in life' to change eyes is short sighted. There are plenty other 'things' on this earth we can achieve with 5,000 $

      Most people that can afford something like this would do it 'just because they can' and consider it around the same as a 'tattoo' or a 'really good night out'.

      Just because they can.

      That is how much free resource and energy is out there. In the system. It's honestly far greater then it ever was. Think Zorg from 5th element. But much more banal.

      Judge and equate all you want. But there is no 'technically' insurmountable reason that this couldn't be freely available to anyone other then pyramid schemes and delusional thinking. You could probably be the first lifehacker to build an eye laser yourself and do it for 2500 USD

      To the OP, I'm a trans person. And getting surgery to live your life as you are. Is not evil. No one is stealing from u to allow trans women and men to be free and happy. In fact most trans people pay MORE then what is equitable for substandard care. But that's not a problem unique to trans people and anyone else.

      The shit that you guys are neglecting to really care about is the inequity and corruption in our current means of doling out these resources.

      I emplore you to look at the bigger picture before you try to troll.

    3. Re:How lost these people must be.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone's sour about getting a shitty dominant gene, despite the odds. (Hint: it's you!)

    4. Re: How lost these people must be.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so sure, your cocky and arrogant attitude makes me want to rip off your eyes

    5. Re:How lost these people must be.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To imagine that changing their eye color will make them happier.

      An awful lot of people imagine that breast implants will make them happier, too. Are they wrong? I honestly don't see how this is different from any other cosmetic procedure - much less invasive than implants, liposuction, or face lift. Higher risk of blindness. What's it matter if some rich fuck wants to remake herself as Bette Davis?

  10. I used to have two girlfriends... by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

    Not at the same time :( but I found that if we had a all-night fuck session, their hazel eyes would turn greyish-blue as they got more tired. A good all nighter with an 8-ball would do the same thing, too.

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    1. Re:I used to have two girlfriends... by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      I always assumed that was what the song was about by Crystal Gayle, screwing until that happened...

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    2. Re: I used to have two girlfriends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My all nighters.... I never thought to look at the eyes. Too busy with the sex and other stuff...

  11. Is this a good thing??? by andydread · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not sure this is a good thing. The extra melanin apparently gives the eye extra protection from UV rays. I guess if you live in the far north its no big issue but if you live in the southern hemisphere near the equator you may want to thing twice about this. That melanin is there for a reason

    1. Re:Is this a good thing??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you have worse chance up in the north as the snow and ice reflects more UV into your face. But this is only for roughly half of the year.

    2. Re: Is this a good thing??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      People with dark eyes have a higher prevelance of cataracts, precisely because of the absorption.

      People with light eyes have higher prevelance of eye cancer.

      However, eye cancer is really rare, while cataracts are very common.

      On the whole blue eyes win in terms of over all medical risk.

    3. Re:Is this a good thing??? by geekymachoman · · Score: 2

      Of course it's not a good thing. But as I see it... only people that worry more about "looks" (some people like blue eyes, especially in asia) will bypass thousands and thousands of years of evolution in favor of "looking good", and nature has a way of dealing with stupidity.

    4. Re:Is this a good thing??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      think *

    5. Re:Is this a good thing??? by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure this is a good thing. The extra melanin apparently gives the eye extra protection from UV rays. I guess if you live in the far north its no big issue but if you live in the southern hemisphere near the equator you may want to thing twice about this. That melanin is there for a reason

      Good thing Slashdotters are protected, computer displays don't produce UV-rays!

    6. Re:Is this a good thing??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure this is a good thing. The extra melanin apparently gives the eye extra protection from UV rays. I guess if you live in the far north its no big issue but if you live in the southern hemisphere near the equator you may want to thing twice about this. That melanin is there for a reason

      Can't be much worse than injecting a powerful nerve poison* into your face, yet many pay a lot for surgeons to do that.

      * (botox)

    7. Re:Is this a good thing??? by Ogive17 · · Score: 2

      My wife is Japanese so her physical traits are quite easy to predict. I have dark brown hair and hazel eyes (brown or green depending on the light). Our son was born with blue eyes, which did not surprise me because I knew most babies were born with blue eyes (but I did not know why). Apparently in Japan (and the rest of Asia I assume) this does not happen. This makes me wonder if such a procedure would be successful there.

      I can definitely see it becoming very popular in S. Korea, though.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    8. Re:Is this a good thing??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > My wife is Japanese so her physical traits are quite easy to predict. I have dark brown hair and hazel eyes (brown or green depending on the light). Our son was born with blue eyes, which did not surprise me because I knew most babies were born with blue eyes (but I did not know why)

      Or because the real biological father has blue eyes... :)

    9. Re:Is this a good thing??? by chihowa · · Score: 2

      Yeah, functionally, blue eyes kind of suck. Sunny summer or snowy winter, I can't leave home without sunglasses. I remember the first time I went skiing with a guy from Korea and he found out that we don't just wear sunglasses to look "styling".

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    10. Re: Is this a good thing??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are parts of the northern hemisphere that are also close to the equator...

    11. Re:Is this a good thing??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should publish statistics about it.

  12. Woah woah woah!!!! by SoVi3t · · Score: 3, Funny

    What's this you're doing to my brown eye?

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
    1. Re:Woah woah woah!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Porn stars bleach their brown eye all the time. It's nothing to worry about!

    2. Re:Woah woah woah!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1!

    3. Re:Woah woah woah!!!! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Mandatory anal bleaching.

      Deal with it.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Woah woah woah!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I'll stick to belching.

    5. Re: Woah woah woah!!!! by MenThal · · Score: 1

      Just as long as it is not feltching...

  13. blue eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    look diseased. never trust anyone with too many visible signs of recessive genes.

    1. Re:blue eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's dumb to associate ALL recessive phenotypes with disease. Some, like blue eyes and blond hair, are undeniably positive.

    2. Re:blue eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whatever you say, Adolf

  14. Speaking for myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome my blue eyed Michael Jordon overlord .....

  15. Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I see is white and gold...

  16. What about me? by Scott64 · · Score: 1

    I have green eyes, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:What about me? by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      So stop crowing, it means you've already won the game of eyes :-P

  17. Glaucoma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a great idea if you want pigmentary glaucoma. Enjoy your tunnel vision!

  18. Why Stop There by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    When you could etch an image in blue and brown instead? Maybe like the All Seeing Eye of Horus or something.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Why Stop There by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      YES! that was my second thought after first thinking it'd be cool to do a Bowie and just have one eye blue, but then.. yes, having a pattern in the eyes? Far cooler.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    2. Re:Why Stop There by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      You don't need laser surgery to do a Bowie. You just need a good punch in the face to blow your pupil.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  19. Golden yellow by staalmannen · · Score: 2

    Anyone know how some animals get the golden yellow colour? That would be cool.

    1. Re:Golden yellow by slew · · Score: 2

      Anyone know how some animals get the golden yellow colour? That would be cool.

      Actually, wikipedia has a pretty good explanation...

      Unfortunately, the appearance of yellow in the iris can sometimes be associated with macular degeneration in humans... That is definitely not cool...

    2. Re:Golden yellow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone know how some animals get the golden yellow colour?

      Contacts.

  20. Pretty cool, but... by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

    There was a certain asshole in Germany back in the 40's who did similar research. It creeps me out a bit that people are attempting (and apparently have succeeded at) the very same thing.

    --
    Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    1. Re:Pretty cool, but... by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Why would this bother you? This is really cool for anyone who wants blue eyes.

    2. Re:Pretty cool, but... by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

      I don't argue that it isn't cool, but the German I'm referring to is infamous for the cruelty of his experiments, thus the creepiness. It reminds one of the other.

      --
      Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    3. Re:Pretty cool, but... by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      As far as I know there weren't any Germans in the 1940s researching how to change eye color. Can you source that?

    4. Re:Pretty cool, but... by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sorry. Sometimes I think just because I know something that everyone does...I'm weird like that. Here you go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J...

      "Mengele's experiments with eyes included attempts to change eye color by injecting chemicals into the eyes of living subjects and killing people with heterochromatic eyes so that the eyes could be removed and sent to Berlin for study."

      I heard from other sources that blue was his target color.

      --
      Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    5. Re:Pretty cool, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a certain asshole in Germany back in the 40's who did similar research. It creeps me out a bit that people are attempting (and apparently have succeeded at) the very same thing.

      It sounds like you are referring to Dr Mengele's experiments.
      Of all the things he was accused of, the brown eyes to blue experiment is probably the _only_ story that is false.

    6. Re:Pretty cool, but... by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia awaits your edit. It wouldn't surprise me if it was false, not because it's unlikely or anything, but once a person's actions reach a certain level of horror and depravity truly anything is possible and believable. You could say Mengele was launching people out of cannons to see if they could orbit the moon and it would sound completely plausible.

      --
      Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
  21. rip off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only in medicine can you charge 5000 dollars for a few seconds of work.

    1. Re:rip off by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Psssst! Buddy! I've got a laser. I'll shine it in your eyes and turn 'em blue for $5!

      Dumbass. The $5k is called Return on Investment.

    2. Re:rip off by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's a bit more than return on investment there.

    3. Re:rip off by ledow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I once charged $1000 equivalent in local currency to walk into a place, press a power button and press Enter and then walk out again (server "wasn't working", whole business was down, told them to try various things, ended up in them requesting and emergency callout, had to move clients around and rush over there, to find that the display on a server wasn't switched on. On the screen, it had "Press Enter to boot from...." message. I pressed Enter. Waited around a bit to ensure that was all that went wrong, charged a day's callout, went home).

      It's not the action you take, it's the knowing that the action you take is the correct action to fix things, guaranteed. Back then, I wasn't paid by the hour, or paid by the qualification, or paid by the years of experience, or paid by the number of things I did. I was paid to solve the problem. And solving the problem often needed a whole lot more insight than just pressing a button but often that's what it LOOKED like. "Should we just restore from backup?" Woah, no, hold fire. Let's stop, think. And that stopping and thinking saved my arse on more than a few occasions rather than launching into fixing the symptoms of the problem.

      And I bet medical school costs a FUCKING lot of money and the laser costs a FUCKING lots of money and the insurance if you get things wrong costs a FUCKING lot of money and the sterile building full of nurses and other equipment costs a FUCKING lot of money too. Plus, it's cosmetic surgery, so it's profit-based. To be honest, I'm amazed it's that cheap. You can barely get laser correction surgery for that price.

    4. Re:rip off by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Nope. That's return on investment. The inventor invested time & money. The clinic that bought the device did so with money. The technician who operates the device invested time & money into their education. Everybody wants to make a profit.

      If this was an AIDS vaccine or something, I'd say "yeah man, but the greater good!" But this is a device invented to efficiently separate fools from their money. More power to 'em.

  22. browneye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shooting a laser at my browneye. What could possibly go wrong?

  23. This is good by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Blue eyes are universally more attractive to all humans at a subconscious level. That has been scientifically proven. It has to do with sensing pupil dilation easier with the high contrast of black and blue (or green or hazel or any other light color) to sense mutual attraction as nonverbal communication. If a person's irises are black, the signal to the other person's brain is that they're disinterested in them romantically.

    1. Re:This is good by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Sounds like junk-science to me.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:This is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like junk-science to me.

      It could do with a decent reference on the alleged statistical association between blue eyes and the ability to read pupil dilation. I think there's little doubt however that pupil dilatation signals "I like what I see". It might also explain why black irises are associated with 'creepy' in horror films: we can't read changing pupil dilation.

    3. Re:This is good by PPH · · Score: 1

      I think it actually works the other way around. With light colored irises, the constriction becomes much more evident and that is a signal for disinterest. People with very dark pigmentation appear to be dialated all the time resulting in a misread cue. It's why people appear more attactive in dimly lit locations and why people used to use belladonna.

      I have a (female) friend with very dark (almost black) irises. She is OK looking but she can't keep guys from hitting on her. Even when she makes every attempt to exude a "f*ck off" attitude.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:This is good by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Nice references. Now I know it is junk science.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re: This is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also doesn't fit with what we know about culture and social cues. People raised in an Asian culture will focus more on the eyes and surrounding features for facial cues. Whereas westerners focus more on the mouth.

      This difference is most obvious with emoticons. Japanese emoticons emphasize and exaggerate the eyes, while Western the mouth.

    6. Re: This is good by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Excellent point about Western vs. Japanese emoticons.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  24. The boys from Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Need I say more?

  25. Brown eyes are beautiful... by gweihir · · Score: 0

    Blue ones not so much. They are rather washed out and unremarkable in most cases. Only advantage is that blue works better with colored contact lenses. Why change something that is already good?

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Brown eyes are beautiful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would explain why women never find blue eyes attractive on a man.

    2. Re:Brown eyes are beautiful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on where do you live. If you live in a northern country where everybody has blue eyes, you may find them "unremarkable". On the other hand, I live in Spain, a country where almost everybody has brown eyes and dark hair (myself included), and blue and green eyes are considered very beautiful here, if only because they are so uncommon. For example, a friend of mine always attributes his successes with women to his blue eyes.

    3. Re:Brown eyes are beautiful... by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      That depends on where do you live. If you live in a northern country where everybody has blue eyes, you may find them "unremarkable".

      I wonder if there are such countries. Here in Finland, most people seem to have greyish eyes with green or blue overtones, but a lot of natives also have very dark eyes, not to mention immigrants. So we do regard blue eyes as somewhat special and attractive -- though we also have "blue-eyed" as a synonym for "gullible".

      At school we were taught that the gene for blue eyes is recessive when compared with brown eyes, which might explain the global trend, but it didn't matter either way to our class of 25 shades of grey.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  26. my prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Japan, a few people will do this, mainly celebrities. In South Korea, everybody except spies will do this. In North Korea, just the spies.

  27. She turned her brown eyes blue, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He turned her blue eyes black.

  28. Ancient article just rehashed on a crappy site.. by Rick+in+China · · Score: 1

    This isn't "news", you can find articles stating the exact same information from like, 2011. Some due diligence please!

  29. Donuts by itzly · · Score: 2

    I used donuts. After all, just like Crystal Gale was singing: "donuts make my brown eyes blue..."

  30. The shape of things to come. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I predict it'll become part of the plot to a film or a TV episode, that a blue eyed mom and a blue-eyed dad will have a baby with blue eyes, and the dad will FREAK and call the mom a whore, because his GENOTYPE really codes for brown eyes like he was born with, as was everyone in his family going back 10 generations, and that his eyes only LOOK blue because of the 5000 dollar laser eye surgery he got, and any kid that is actually the fruit of his loins should be BROWN-eyed, since brown-colored irises are a dominant trait!

    Then she'll reveal that she knew the kid's eyes would be brown due to amniocenteses, and she panicked, knew he'd freak out, and so got in utero laser-eye color-change surgery for the baby so they'd match the EXPECTED color, and that he's the liar for never telling her what his birth-eye-color was, since they met online and he described his eyes as blue!

    It'll be just like in the Gift of the Magi!

    1. Re:The shape of things to come. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tyranny is dominant and liberty is recessive. Collectivism is dominant and individualism is recessive. Swarthy is dominant and fair recessive. What do the racists have in common other than liberty, individualism and fair complexion?

      This message is brought to you by Karl Martell. EDUCATE YOURSELF.

  31. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Light your farts with LASERS! YEE-HAW!

  32. Do not stare into laser with remaining eye by sjames · · Score: 1

    'nuff said

  33. Green! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about green. If blue is possible then green should be possible as well?

    1. Re:Green! by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      http://trycolors.com/ If not green, you can make hazel.

    2. Re:Green! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not especially an ideal.

  34. No one knows what it's like to be the bad man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to be the sad man... behind blue eyes...

    but soon we can ALL know!

    Only $5000 folks. And they call that a bargain - the best I've ever had...

  35. File under .. by aliquis · · Score: 1

    .. false advertisement.

    Damn liars =P

    Yeah, you with the boob job, you too!
    (It may still look better though. But I guess it may look the most interesting when a black of whatever shade have blue eyes, but maybe that's simply because I'm white from Scandinavia and white people with blue eyes isn't all that different ..)

  36. How do you get red or amber eyes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dig the vampire look.

    1. Re:How do you get red or amber eyes? by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      Vampire? You want some glitter injected into your epidermis? I can do that for only $5000. (Results not guaranteed permanent. Additional procedures may be required. Not FDA approved. Your friends will both love and fear you.).

  37. I''m saving $2500 by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    See, I'm only going to do one eye. That way I'll look really unusual (or worse terms :-) ) , plus I'll have 2500 to waste on hookers and blow.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  38. Godwin's Law in Force by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

    I bet the Nazis would have loved a way to turn brown eyes blue.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:Godwin's Law in Force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? It doesn't change the DNA. Blue eyes wouldn't even be enough to get you on the SS since they required proof of the right ancestry (which isn't much different from what the other countries did, the main difference is they were honest about the discrimination).

    2. Re:Godwin's Law in Force by neminem · · Score: 1

      Know who would really have loved this - darkeyes: http://coppermind.net/wiki/Nah...

      Probably a good thing they don't have technology like this, or they'd go crazy. (But in our world, where your caste is *not* determined by the color of your eyes, I'm not sure why anyone would pay for something like this.)

  39. How much for just one eye? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    Is it only half price, or is there some "set up" overhead?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  40. Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you can turn one half of each eye blue. Top blue/bottom brown, etc.

  41. Some Hitler-ish technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some succeeding where Dr. Death (Mengele) failed... with no casualties.

  42. Old news? Similar 2011 article by yakumo.unr · · Score: 2

    Here's an article on basically the same thing from 2011:

    http://news.discovery.com/huma...

    Is this a new system of doing this, a new group following previous working, just rehashing old news?

    Or is it the same group getting a lot closer to being approved for use?

    1. Re:Old news? Similar 2011 article by yakumo.unr · · Score: 1

      At $5,000 the price is identical same, as is the fact that it's a Californian company, the newer article just doesn't mention a specific doctors name.

      Is this just a slashvertisement ?

  43. The company is called Stroma Medical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The article doesn't seem to even mention the name of the company. I believe they are called Stroma Medical. There may be others doing it too.

  44. eye tatoos by oever · · Score: 1

    You might be able to get the procedure sponsored if you choose to have a particular motif. I'm assuming that it's possible to selectively etch away the melanin. So this breakthrough opens the way to eye tatoos.

    --
    DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    1. Re:eye tatoos by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Eyeball tattoos have been done for several years.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  45. And from blue to brown? by cesbolin · · Score: 1

    And in related news, scientists discover how to turn blue eyes brown, after people realized that everyone having blue eyes was boring

  46. That won't change anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those people will still be full of shit.

  47. Asia by jay+age · · Score: 1

    First thought when reading it: Hong Kong.

    They know where are they going with this, and if it works and it's safe, they'll make a killing in Asia. There is lots of demand for this kind of fripperies there, from 'whitening' creams, to changing the eye lids, and this just takes the cake.

    Street shops offering it in Kowloon? Possible.