Slashdot Mirror


Zuckerberg and Gates-Backed Startup Seeks To Shake Up African Education

theodp writes The WSJ reports an army of teachers wielding Nook tablets and backed by investors including Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg is on a mission to bring cheap [$6.50/month], internet-based, private education to millions of the world's poorest children in Africa and Asia. In Kenya, 126,000 students are enrolled at 400+ Bridge International Academies that have sprung up across the country since the company was founded in 2009. Bridge's founders are challenging the long-held assumption that governments rather than companies should lead mass education programs. The Nook tablets are used to deliver lesson plans used by teachers (aka "scripted instruction"), as well as to collect test results from students to monitor their progress."

119 comments

  1. Missionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hasn't Africa suffered enough from the good old "missionary spirit" and its endless raft of unintended consequences?

    1. Re:Missionaries by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I'm with you.

      Missionary work is ultimately what got native Americans.

      The biggest mistake they made was giving up their way of life and their world view.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    2. Re:Missionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey we need a new pool of cheap H1Bs

      The Chinese, Indian and Eastern European devs are starting to get costly

    3. Re:Missionaries by zidium · · Score: 2

      They're doing much more amazing stuff over at www.worldreader.org! Delivering thousands of hardened, solar-powered Kindle eInk devices filled with 1,000s of books for a complete classical education to children all across Central and Eastern Africa. I believe in them so much I donate 10% of every paycheck to them and have given them $10s of thousands so far. My money went directly to give ~2,000 Ugandans more material than their city has ever known (population 500,000). Check them out.

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    4. Re:Missionaries by crunchy_one · · Score: 1

      Gatea and Zuckerberg. Yeah, I trust them about as much as I would King Leopold II of Belgium, were he still with us.

    5. Re:Missionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And increase the number of consumers.

      Facebook is an advertising company (I'm surprised Google hasn't jumped on board) and getting more people online will only increase their business and of course, profits.

      This could be double plus good: African nations get educated and developed, American billionaires get richer and the US Middle Class continues on its downward spiral until all of our living standards hit equilibrium - except for the billionaire class who will be on their mega yachts off the coast of France or Greece protected by Xe (Blackwater).

      Of course, if we're lucky, we'll have a massive political revolt (hopefully peaceful) and our economy changes into something modern instead of primitive Capitalism.

    6. Re:Missionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can tell us, you're the host file guy, right?

    7. Re:Missionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

    8. Re:Missionaries by bmajik · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Small Part Native American here. Grandpa and mom are buried on the Res.

      Not that my heritage should matter, but some people can't hear the message until they've decided what bucket to put the messenger in....

      How is the way of life and/or world view of the Native Americans worth saving?

      Same question for impoverished rural Africans?

      We are having this conversation only because an objectively superior culture with an objectively superior propensity for technical development has built this amazing medium for our use.

      My ancestors were excellent hunters, excellent farmers, and excellent stewards of natural resources. There are many things to admire and respect about what they did.

      Ultimately, however, I'm glad I don't live in a house made of animal skin; I'm glad I have modern medicine; I'm glad my other ancestors - my white European ones - have shot themselves into space, and have opened a way for my children to someday get off this rock.

      In many ways, Humans of all colors and shapes are still participating in the tribal violence that shaped native Americans and still shapes many Africans.

      Some tribes are better run than others, with better results to show for it. Adapt or die.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    9. Re:Missionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People in Africa think Facebook is the Internet.

    10. Re:Missionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, the kindest thing we could do would be to pull out our evil, white, western money and let those savages starve to death or hack each other to death with machetes. Some species just aren't meant to survive.

    11. Re:Missionaries by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      My ancestors were ... excellent stewards of natural resources.

      Your ancestors hunted North American mega-fauna to extinction, and regularly set fire to the prairies. Destruction of the environment by Native Americans was limited primarily by their lack of technology with which to do so.

    12. Re:Missionaries by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      The Chinese, Indian and Eastern European devs are starting to get costly

      That's not necessarily a bad thing. As the living standards an education levels of each group goes up eventually places run out of cheap backwaters to outsource to. Eventually the whole world gets more skilled and more prosperous.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    13. Re:Missionaries by ITRambo · · Score: 2

      No finger pointing allowed. All of our ancestors, as many of us continue to do so today, made mistakes due to lack of options, or ignorance.

    14. Re:Missionaries by chihowa · · Score: 2

      Some tribes are better run than others, with better results to show for it. Adapt or die.

      I'm in the same boat, heritage-wise. My nick here was supposed to be a jab at my tribe's early assimilation into European culture (it seemed way more clever when I was a kid), but ultimately it was assimilation that led my tribe to be much better off than many others, even if we are much more "white".

      Efforts like the one in the article are less about preserving failing tribes and cultures and more about assimilating their individuals into our own. Hopefully, they bring the good aspects of their culture with them and we are all richer from the process. Part of the reason that they're still stuck in a failing culture is because their lack of education limits their mobility and independent growth.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    15. Re:Missionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if you would use the same "adapt or die" logic on, for example, victims of Hitler and Stalin repressions. Who can say it was worth saving these people, after all if it wasn't for their deaths, Gagaring woudn't end in space and Armstrong on Moon, right?

      Or perhaps implying all these horrors were somehow necessary for advaces in medicine and space travel is fucking idiotic? Perhaps it's just your way of trying to make sense of sensless violence?

    16. Re:Missionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      You don't know North American history very well. Before the White Man came, there were many thriving Native American metropolises throughout the United States. They had cities where there was no crime. In fact, they didn't even need police forces of any sort because everybody lived so peacefully. They were so in harmony with nature that rainbows would appear over their city on a daily basis. Their purely vegan diet meant that all animals were left unharmed and unmolested. Their buildings were constructed of concrete and metal, but they used carbon-neutral variants and techniques. The had an extensive asphalt road network (also constructed using carbon-neutral asphalt variants and techniques), but the special thing about their automobiles was that they were actually carbon-negative! That's right, these automobiles actually took carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere as the Native Americans drove around! But then the White Man came. Using his muskets and cannons, he destroyed the cities. He shot the rainbows. He made the Native Americans eat meat and hamburgers and french fries. He released the captured carbon dioxide into the air, and actually forced the switch to petroleum-based automobile fuels in order to generate more carbon dioxide. He destroyed the most perfect society that had ever existed.

    17. Re:Missionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It was the small population that limited damage, not the lack of technology. Our contemporary level of damage is still determined more by our population than our technology.

      As an aside, setting fire to the prairie was actually beneficial (at the level they were able to do it) and we still manage prairies with fire to this day. Even without human intervention, prairies regularly burn.

    18. Re: Missionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Armstrong on a Moon soundstage?

    19. Re:Missionaries by dave420 · · Score: 1

      That's not really comparable to this programme, as we're not talking about people who have not been contacted before, nor are we talking about sending over church people to lie to the natives in order to get them to change their ways with threats of hell-fire and eternal damnation, or bribe them into such changes with food, tobacco, or booze.

      Education is a very powerful tool indeed - the more educated the world becomes, the lower the birthrate and the higher the quality of life. That should be something we are all behind, especially considering just how ridiculously cheap it is to get good, targeted help over there.

    20. Re:Missionaries by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not to mention the fact that regularly setting fire to the prairies was often considered a *good* thing. It's kind of like the whole wolf issue -- people killed the wolves and then the prairie started dying. Why? Because the herd animals were no longer doing their job -- staying clumped up and tilling/fertilizing the ground in one place, then running as a group to another place, being herded by wolves. Instead they'd spread out and graze down the entire area without spending enough time breaking up the ground an adding enough fertilizer into the soil. Likewise, the burning added nutrients to the soil that helped the plants start growing sooner in the growing season, which gave the entire food chain a leg up at the beginning of the year. It's not all about Bambi.

      So finger pointing is less than helpful, as you pointed out, not only because everyone's ancestors have made mistakes by present-day criteria (otherwise we'd be dead like those who didn't exploit as heavily as our ancestors did), but also, we're still happily making mistakes that some of these earlier groups never made (sometimes on purpose, sometimes by lack of technical ability, sometimes both, depending on the generation you're looking at).

    21. Re:Missionaries by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Missionary work is ultimately what got native Americans.

      Comparing Africa to the Americas is very misleading. Native American populations were decimated by Old World diseases. That didn't happen in Africa, where natives had long been exposed to smallpox, measles, etc. In fact, their greater resistance to many tropical diseases, which disproportionately killed white colonists, helped protect them. If you look at Africa today, the areas that are the most prosperous, are those areas where colonialism was deep and pervasive, leaving behind strong institutions, and economies linked to the wider world. The least prosperous areas are those with little colonial influence, especially isolated inland areas.

      The biggest mistake they made was giving up their way of life and their world view.

      The opposite is true. By any objective measure, those that gave up tribalism and adopted western ways, are doing the best. If you look at income, infant mortality, maternal mortality, violence, longevity, nutrition, literacy, health, sexual abuse, alcoholism, or any other measure you can think of, tribal societies are at the absolute bottom.

    22. Re:Missionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There may be a time when we again need to live in a house made of animal skin, hunt, fish and farm.

      In that case, all the lawyers, politicians, and Women's Studies professors will starve (unless they are Hot, the Women's Studies professors that is).

    23. Re:Missionaries by bmajik · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that inside Nazi Germany nor in Stalinist Russia, there was the problem of a foreign empire clashing with an indigenous culture.

      It seems the best American analogue to the experiences of those regimes was what was done to Japanese Americans in WW2 - which while awful, thankfully, doesn't hold a candle to what was done to the German Jews or the Soviet victims of Stalinism.

      The history of the world is filled with violent tribal conflict, usually over the right to settle and tax a given piece of land.

      The Jews and Nazis weren't fighting for control over Bavaria.

      The Europeans did not set out with the goal of exterminating the native Americans. The NAs had their land taken from them by force, which is how it has always worked on this planet.

      There are two general possibilities for how to proceed from here

      1) convince people that taking land from other people is immoral

      2) find additional land that is both unsettled and desirable

      #1 is worth working on, and can show some real improvements, but will ultimately not be enough.

      #2 is also worth working on, and why I am a space nutter, and why I am interested in how seasteading plays out.

      A mix of #1 and #2 may help humanity not kill each other completely. We've gone almost 70 years with the ability to wipe ourselves out and we haven't done so yet. That's an encouraging indicator.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    24. Re:Missionaries by bmajik · · Score: 2

      Another question to wrestle with:

      Why didn't the colonization and empire building go the other direction?

      Why weren't the native Americans launching ocean going vessels towards Europe? Why, when the Europeans arrived, were the NAs unable to repel them?

      Why were there so many top-notch German scientists and engineers in that society in the 1930s and 1940s? Why, given its amazing technological advantages, did Nazi Germany still ultimately lose the war?

      If you want a really uncomfortable question: why was South Africa apparently a much nicer place -- for everyone -- under European management with the distasteful Apartheid policy? Why has that society _regressed_ since kicking out the colonial invaders?

      There are books on these topics that take varying points of view.

      My point is very simple: pining for primitive cultures is romantically appealing but intellectually dishonest. And holding our ancestors to the standards of today is also silly - we can only hold them to the standards of their day --- unless you mean to imply that there has been no human progress.

      It is precisely the fact that the Western world has shown dramatic human progress - even at the cost of slowing its own rate of expansion and conquest - that we can be confident that Western Civilization has something to offer the world.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    25. Re:Missionaries by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat, heritage-wise.

      Well, we can all say the same thing if we go back far enough, can't we? It is a sad irony that our once evolutionarily advantageous inability to see beyond what divides us to focus on the joy and beauty in all of us that make us all uniquely the same (as well as identically unique), is what might well eventually destroy us. But then I never dreamed the world I grew up in would be one in which I might actually be killed by a robot. So it goes...

      --
      That is all.
    26. Re:Missionaries by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      How about convincing people that net population growth is impossible in the long run, so let's randomly sterilize ~50% of the world population at birth until we get a handle on it or until we're down to about 1 billion people. The overshoot would take us down to about 500M before the population started to rebound, even if all people were again allowed to productively interbreed. Small enough to sustain an advanced society, hopefully small enough to exclude Kardashians.

      --
      That is all.
    27. Re:Missionaries by bmajik · · Score: 1

      Well, I personally take the view that any society that forcibly sterilized 50% of its residents doesn't deserve to continue as a society.

      I also don't think Malthus was correct.

      Someone insinuated that I'd be ok with Jewish concentration camps if that resulted in a society that survived.

      That's a hard question to answer. On one hand, what was done to the Jews was clearly immoral. On the other hand, a society that goes extinct isn't around to argue that it was a moral society. Heinlein noted that survival is somewhat of a precursor to moral behavior.

      What we'd like to hope is that the choice between survival and violence against others is a false choice - that there is always a way to both survive and not harm others.

      But that may not be the case for all societies in all situations.

      It may be that the Native Americans came to the conclusion that you did -- that anything beyond a certain population was unsustainable given the technology level and resources they had available to them.

      That may have been an eminently moral choice.

      It also means that what they thought doesn't matter today - because there weren't enough of them to defend themselves against an invading society with different ideas.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    28. Re:Missionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're either a troll or a public school teacher.

    29. Re:Missionaries by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      unless they are Hot, the Women's Studies professors that is.

      They are not.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    30. Re: Missionaries by davester666 · · Score: 1

      yay for Nazi's developing greenscreens!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    31. Re:Missionaries by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      China has a 1 child per family rule, you might want to research this as it's morally less damaging than your suggestion. Also note that the first world countries are all in population decline, it's the third world that has the surplus. So either wipe out the third world or convert them into first world countries and the population problem is gone.

    32. Re:Missionaries by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Part of the reason that they're still stuck in a failing culture is because ...

      ... they got fucked over.

      FTFY

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    33. Re:Missionaries by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Nah.

      Your unit of measure is flawed.

      People who have been decimated by invasion would not agree with your definition of "success."

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    34. Re:Missionaries by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Education, eduschmation ...

      The plot is formulaic. Instead of the incentives you listed, " ... change their ways with threats of hell-fire and eternal damnation, or bribe them into such changes with food, tobacco, or booze. ... " substitute "education."

      It's still the fucking cheese in the mousetrap.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    35. Re:Missionaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You appear to be implying a higher value for one society, one way of life, over another.

      I'm not sure that's so readily done.

    36. Re:Missionaries by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't so much disagree as twist their worldview around until the remnants of colonialism are somehow their ancestors 'great work'.

      See also any liberal Americans reaction to the fact that slaves were lousy workers and didn't build any significant wealth.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    37. Re:Missionaries by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Sorry.

      Your argument poisons itself with poorly thought-out extremes.

      "Colonialism" is a state established after the victory.

      " ,,, any liberal American[']s reaction ..."

      It is disingenuous to make such a statement knowing that neither you nor I (or anyone else) is capable of meeting with, and inquiring as to, the reaction of all liberal Americans.

      Therefore, your post contains 7.5 lbs of vacuous bullshit.

      But thank you for playing.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    38. Re:Missionaries by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      But that means all the disposable tat we love to buy will get more expensive!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    39. Re:Missionaries by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I pretty much hate our "disposable" culture anyways. Building things to a higher quality and repairing them when they break is just much more resource friendly - and you end up with better stuff to boot.

      Which is better - a $15 waffle iron from Walmart that breaks and needs to be replaced every other year - or a $75 one that will last 25 years and when it does eventually break can be fixed for $10 to run another year? Which uses less raw materials over the life of the product? Think about not only the construction materials but also the packaging as each time that replacement comes in more plastic, cardboard, and styrofoam packaging.

      As a people (and really as a planet) we seem to have forsaken and inclination to look at things from a long term perspective - its all about what's cheap in the short term. Eventually we will have to look at things differently.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    40. Re:Missionaries by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Because liberals haven't built their own mythology?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    41. Re:Missionaries by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Because you have not interviewed all liberals, and you failed to have the reading comprehension skills needed to gather that from my post, or, more likely, you are being an asshole because you are rabidly tied to an agenda, and further, you wasted both our time.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    42. Re:Missionaries by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      How is the way of life and/or world view of the Native Americans worth saving?

      Same question for impoverished rural Africans?

      We are having this conversation only because an objectively superior culture with an objectively superior propensity for technical development has built this amazing medium for our use.

      I'm with you buddy. It's the noble savage myth that hippies love to perpetuate. Easter Island is a great example for exposing that drivel.
      Old cultures got taken over by new cultures because that's how evolution works. Ultimately we all have the same ancestors which first stood upright in Africa, and we'll all end up some munge of coffee coloured monkeys in the next few hundred years, so any talk of race seems pointless in the grand scheme of things. Adapt or die, regardless of your race.

    43. Re:Missionaries by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      As Mike Skinner from The Streets says, I'm 45th generation Roman. Go back far enough and we're all 2000th generation African. And since the age of cheap jet travel, we'll all be a mix of everything again within the next 45 generations. Makes racism seem kind of pointless.

    44. Re:Missionaries by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Those people would be dead by now anyway. As a descendant of one of those decimated, I can authoritatively state that I'm better off because of it.

    45. Re:Missionaries by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      That's YOU.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    46. Re:Missionaries by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Recall the phenomenon where the first immigrants do not know the language, work in shit jobs, and are outcasts in the culture.

      Recall that the elders of the second generation object to the "Americanization" of their children and want to teach the young the ways of their roots.

      Recall that the third generation are fully Americanized and want the immigrants to go back where they came from.

      You are better off because you rode the backs of the victors.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    47. Re:Missionaries by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      You are better off because you rode the backs of the victors.

      Um, this is true for everybody, which is kind of my point. Progress doesn't come for free..

    48. Re:Missionaries by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Well, enjoy your freedom for now.

      You're next in line.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    49. Re:Missionaries by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Any of us could be next, part of the game is to be aware of any threats and adapt accordingly. Those that do continue, those that don't exit early. Welcome to life.

    50. Re:Missionaries by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Welcome to death if you are on the losing end.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  2. They want personal data ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... as well as to collect test results from students to monitor their progress.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:They want personal data ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, that.. plus (microsoft-backed) b&n needs somewhere to dump all their unsold and returned nook products.......

  3. We need more drones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spawn more cheap workers now!

    1. Re:We need more drones! by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      You require more vespene gas.

  4. Pencils by ISoldat53 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The school I support in Zambia is happy just to get pencils and pens. They have no use for anything electronic.We are working to get them enough electricity to have a light on when it gets dark. Sometimes we in the west have no idea the rudimentary conditions some folks live in.

    1. Re:Pencils by zidium · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's why http://www.worldreader.org/ delivers hardened (they replace the shell with rubber), solar-powered eink Kindles. A single day out in the Sun (where the kids spend a lot of their school day, anyway) and it is good for 30+ days. The kids are trained for 2 weeks (with a "pet egg") on how to properly care for / handle fragile equipment before they are loaned the kindles during school hours. Each kindle comes stocked with over 1,000 educational books. The literacy rate *shoots up* in every area they deliver them, mostly in Central and East Africa. They have a *very* small operational budget, so anything you give them goes a *long* way (compared to most charities).

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    2. Re:Pencils by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Here in Sweden the amount of money to the migration office over four (possibly five?) years is supposed to be closer to 160 billion SEK by now.

      40 billion SEK / year would be 4.6 billion USD.

      I think that's intended to cover the cost of the immigrants the first three years but integration suck so the cost is likely higher and last longer.

      Anyway, those 4.6 billion USD / year would of course IMHO be much better spent on education in the poorest region and possibly spent on water wheels, toilets, sewage treatment plants, tree plantation, modern farming equipment, solar cells and such if there was money left over.

      Possibly with demands for doing the right choices back, as in work for or implement democratic elections (could be argued whatever that's good or bad if the result is some don't get any help), equal access to schools for both females and males, maybe demand that what is taught have a scientific background and not a religious one, tolerance against various threatened groups in the society and so on.

      To move even the right people here isn't really solving the problem in the shitty regions anyway, it just make this country worse and solves life issues for a few.

      If nothing else if some countries was successful while some was shit those who were shit have the possibility to spot the difference both in their living standard and in how the societies work. But I understand it may take a very long time to catch up if you don't get help from those way ahead of you.

    3. Re:Pencils by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great work and thanks for your contributions to this effort.

    4. Re:Pencils by nbauman · · Score: 1

      They're not educating people. They're teaching rote memorization.

      A friend of mine was in the Peace Corps teaching science in a small village in Africa.

      They had never seen ice before.

      He decided to show them ice. He used a portable gas-powered refrigerator to freeze some water. He put a piece of ice in a test tube, heated it with a candle, and showed them how the ice became water.

      One kid, who was a little more clever than the others, challenged him. The kid didn't accept my friend's argument that the ice became water. He thought that the water was coming from the candle.

      Actually, that's a good point. How do you know that the water is coming from the ice rather than the candle?

      You could come up with an experiment and see what happens. Then you'd be doing science rather than memorizing facts.

      How could you possibly teach a lesson like that with "scripted instruction"? http://m.theatlantic.com/educa...

      The really important lesson comes when the kids come up with an idea that isn't in the script, and ask a question that isn't in the script. The scripted instruction teachers will be helpless in that situation. They'll just tell the kid to be quiet and go on with the script. They have to. The teachers are being rated according to how well they follow the script.

    5. Re:Pencils by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It makes sense to tackle the immediate problem of people living in terrible conditions but who have the ability to leave by accepting them, as it doesn't cost much and properly-treated immigrants (given free language lessons, free training) can be an incredible boon to ageing European populations. At the same time, it makes just as much sense to spend money to stem the flow of those who immigrate out of sheer necessity. Tackling both helps everyone - there and in Europe.

    6. Re:Pencils by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Good cause, I made a donation. My wife uses my Galaxy Tab to display study materials for her nursing certificate. A world of information posted by others studying the same thing. The solar powered Kindles sound wonderful, I might get one for myself.

    7. Re:Pencils by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Each kindle comes stocked with over 1,000 educational books. The literacy rate *shoots up* in every area they deliver them, mostly in Central and East Africa. They have a *very* small operational budget, so anything you give them goes a *long* way (compared to most charities).

      I started working in educational technology in the 1960s. I've seen major fads come and go.

      Here's the most important thing I've learned: Always ask them if they have published a study in a peer-reviewed journal about their success (or failure). I didn't see any studies like that on their web site.

      It's pretty easy to put together a pr stunt for the cameras and collect some happy kids who love reading. It's pretty difficult to deliver useful results with a sustained effort.

    8. Re:Pencils by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Here in Sweden the amount of money to the migration office over four (possibly five?) years is supposed to be closer to 160 billion SEK by now.

      40 billion SEK / year would be 4.6 billion USD.

      I think that's intended to cover the cost of the immigrants the first three years but integration suck so the cost is likely higher and last longer.

      Anyway, those 4.6 billion USD / year would of course IMHO be much better spent on education in the poorest region and possibly spent on water wheels, toilets, sewage treatment plants, tree plantation, modern farming equipment, solar cells and such if there was money left over.

      Umm... OK...
      You DO acknowledge that you are uninformed about the subject you are expressing your opinion on.
      Only it appears that you don't exactly realize that.
      Nor the consequences of your lack of knowledge and understanding of the problem, on the process and the final product of you forming the ideas on the subject.

      I.e. That money... Sweden is NOT spending that money to solve the problems in Africa.
      Sweden is spending that money to solve the problems in SWEDEN.
      I.e. To integrate those immigrants into Swedish society.

      So they will pick up Swedish language, customs, send their kids to Swedish schools to learn how great the Sweden is... and hopefully become productive members of Swedish society.
      And those who won't integrate or decide to be unproductive criminals - well... you know right where to find them AND you can tell right away how they are integrating into the society cause you do checkups as a part of that social program.
      Instead of you... know... spending huge amounts of money on deportation and border patrols and militarization of society and building walls to stop immigrants from getting in, prisons...
      And in the process turning Sweden into something more akin to Arizona. Only colder.

      Sweden COULD cancel all that and just send the money and people to Africa... well... except all those Palestinian refugees from Syria (I know, right? DOUBLE refugees. With no country to be returned to.) - AND IT WOULD STILL HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM.
      And other problems related to population decline and lack of menial labor force.

      But hey... You live in a Scandinavian utopia as Hans Rosling likes to put it.
      You don't like that money being SPENT AT HOME IN SWEDEN, I'm sure there are many ways you can try to influence your local government officials to do something about it.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    9. Re:Pencils by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How could you possibly teach a lesson like that with a tablet?

      I figured this out years ago. Basically you let them get onto the internet, but there's a firewall that blocks porn sites. Within a few weeks, you've taught millions of African children how to hack through firewalls. Then, every month, a random piece of electronics breaks on the tablet. Within a year, you'll have African children able to create fully-functional, internet-ready tablets out of coat hangers, leaves, ivory, and nut shells. The plan of "buying a million tractors and dumping them in Africa to boost their agriculture" is solved, because the problem "But who will fix one million tractors that have broken down within 5 years?" -- Kids that learned how to use ants to thread wire through a gupapo tree to get a better WiFi signal -- that's who. Problem solvers!

  5. Scripted Instruction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scripted "education" will not create the democratizing force that American public education was supposed to be (and largely was until NCLB). You can hardly create people capable of thinking outside the box when all you do is provide them with a box, so to speak. However, that being said, scripted lessons will certainly be a HUGE improvement over the little to no schooling that many African nations have. In the US, we see breakdowns in the effectiveness of education at 4th grade and 8th grade, which require dramatic shifts in pedagogy (compared to previous years) to accommodate. So, I'd say these scripted lessons can probably help developing nations bring their average education level to the 4th grade, which is, again, a HUGE improvement over the rampant illiteracy that likely plague those areas.

    1. Re:Scripted Instruction by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Excellently put. At least teaching within the box will help students see the box, and *some* will attempt to see outside it. But for a full education, you need to start developing creative and critical thinking *early* (like, at 3-4 years) at which point, any scripted instruction will become a way of attaining more focused knowledge, as opposed to providing the sum of the child's learning experience.

      My kids regularly call their teachers out on "lies to children" instruction, but are gracious enough to not try and get in the way of the point that's actually being taught (identify the box, but still bother to look inside). The teachers in general seem more delighted than annoyed, and sometimes use these points for special study in the class.

      My point is that if African children are learning scripted study in the classroom, they are free to explore outside that script outside the classroom, and are pretty much required to do so to survive. Their attitude towards education and what it accomplishes is guaranteed to be significantly different from the NCLB world-view.

  6. It's already a failure... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If step 1 is not kill all the current warlords and government leaders it will fail.

    An uneducated population is a lot easier to control than an educated one, These corrupt and evil leaders that have kept Africa in a constant state of turmoil and fear will not have anything to do with improving the education of the people.

    Because if you educate them, they will learn that they are being abused and rise up. 100 men with machine guns are no match for 1,000,000 angry people with rocks and sticks.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:It's already a failure... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      If step 1 is not kill all the current warlords and government leaders it will fail.

      The CIA fully agrees - history has shown that strategy always works...

      Though it's a fair point that their focus should be on the means of communication rather than on implementing a curriculum. If the people have affordable 'net and there are classes in their language that they can gain immediate benefit from, everything else will sort itself out. Parents will ensure that their children learn the long-term benefit stuff (say every study on poor, rural education ever).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:It's already a failure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What fucking sheltered world do you live in? If they have "affordable net", everything is magically solved? Like food? Fresh water?
      Only a basement dweller sees the world like this. Grow up.

    3. Re:It's already a failure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, because as we all known from both history and contemporary politics, it's exceedeingly hard to control population of bright educated westeners and lure them to for example support of a war. On the other hand, who ever heard of primitive savages from jungle/desert mounting insurection against these educated civilised men?

    4. Re:It's already a failure... by Kohath · · Score: 1

      It's up to the locals to do that. Locals need to choose things like rule of law, free markets, and popularly elected government. Otherwise it can't be sustained. The things that outsiders can do are:

      - stop meddling
      - show a positive example -- like Botswana
      - trade
      - don't deny weapons and ammunition to people who need them to protect themselves

    5. Re:It's already a failure... by Khashishi · · Score: 2

      We've already tried step 1 many, many times. We're pretty good at killing warlords and toppling governments. What we aren't good at is filling the power vacuum that follows.

    6. Re:It's already a failure... by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      supplying weapons is meddling

    7. Re:It's already a failure... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If step 1 is not kill all the current warlords and government leaders it will fail.

      Do you understand that Africa is a big continent, and not every region is governed by warlords?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:It's already a failure... by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Denying people the ability to acquire weapons is meddling. Any kind of trade could also be called meddling, or refusing to trade. But if you trade goods, including weapons, without choosing sides, locals get to choose their own path.

    9. Re:It's already a failure... by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      if you trade goods, including weapons, without choosing sides, locals get to choose their own path

      That will never happen.

    10. Re:It's already a failure... by Kohath · · Score: 1

      That will never happen.

      I guess there's no point in talking about it then. Knowing the future must make reading the news a little boring for you.

    11. Re:It's already a failure... by Larryish · · Score: 1

      All Africa's leaders will become warlords, after cable news tell mainstream America to call them "warlords" and shows a few of them in native headgear speaking some durned surr-spishuss soundin furrin langudge.

    12. Re:It's already a failure... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      You are incorrect. The USA and CIA dont kill warlords, they replace them with our preferred warlords.
      Very large difference.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  7. American education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish someone would show interest in failing American education. The feds and unions have destroyed it.

  8. Leave Africa Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've had enough sanctimonious colonial meddling. It's oppressive and supremacist to impose European standards on them.

  9. Frankly... by Kokuyo · · Score: 2

    Looking at our own educational systems, both in the US and Europe, I'm not too sure that we're the right one's to show the Africans how to do it properly.

    We're so geared towards diplomas that our higher education facilities have turned into diploma printing machines. Whether people learn actual skills or are able to actually use the knowledge that is ground into their heads seems less and less important.

    So I'm not really too sure whether we shouldn't just eat a slice of humble pie in that regard. OTOH, perhaps this startup truly will be effective. In that case, I'm all for applying what they'll learn to our own schools.

    1. Re:Frankly... by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      We see a lot of politicians and people in the corporate world that equate corporatization of something with "making it better."

      Gates has always had corporatization in his foundation deals. It's probably happening here, too.

    2. Re:Frankly... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      American and European education systems are admired all over the world. People send their children to be educated in the West all the time. Who sends their kids to Africa for school?

      These knee-jerk anti-Western attitudes need to go. They're not based in any kind of reality.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Frankly... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Only in this case they may have a point. Gates, along with Pierson Publishing, is largely behind the Common-Core idiocy. Pushing that on those kids there won't result in smarter Africans, just more money in a few people's pocket.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  10. Re:Another Oxymoron by amalcolm · · Score: 1

    Just moron - and that's the Anonymous Coward

    --
    Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
  11. Gates and Zuckerberg, of all things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Given their track record, I'd trust them as much as the drug dealer in the shady park in my neighborhood (or most probably less).

  12. "companies should lead mass education programs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I guess it makes sense, since the point of mass education is to prepare people to WORK, to spend their life contributing to capital...

    If you think the people in these areas are backwards, benighted, oppressed, or UNHAPPY because they don't have access to a formal education via eReaders, you are just as racist as the last several centuries of imperialists... this kind of program is meant to get the population used to:
    -dealing with, and planning their lives around, money
    -consuming and replacing technology
    -compacting leisure time into discrete chunks of consumption - what we in the west refer to as "entertainment"
    etc.

    This program sees these people as one thing, an underexploited source of revenue

  13. How to "fix" some African Nation... by tekrat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ladies and Gentlemen; the solution is not simply to provide kids with an education. We've got to shake up the constant warfare, dictatorships and starvation.

    And there is a solution. It's called commerce.

    Ladies and Gentlemen; I present the humble Volkswagen Beetle. The original I mean --the rear-engined, air-cooled one.

    The tooling for the car exists in both Brazil and Mexico, where it's no longer made, so that is cheap to aquire. You then need to build a factory, which employs people, and you need to start building the car, which employs people. This builds the economy; which creates other businesses.

    People then buy the car, and the car can be exported into other African nations. Furthermore, you stamp out parts for export worldwide, to countries where the car used to be sold, to those who still run them.

    The car is perfect for Africa, where roads are not great, and the car is durable, simple, easy to repair, and cheap on gas. Its construction is some African Nation would raise the economy of the entire continent.

    And then they can build their own schools instead of needing the money of billionaires.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:How to "fix" some African Nation... by crunchy_one · · Score: 1

      cheap on gas

      As a serial bug owner, I can tell you that 18 MPG was the best you could expect.

    2. Re:How to "fix" some African Nation... by Marginal+Coward · · Score: 2

      Not to mention air pollution, which is perhaps the primary reason it's no longer made - even in Brazil and Mexico.

    3. Re:How to "fix" some African Nation... by pz · · Score: 1

      Really? I used to get 30 mpg when everything was in perfect tune. The trick, though, was it was very easy to fall off of that global optimum, so you had to keep continually tuning and tweaking if efficiency was the goal. If you didn't care so much, then it was a wonderfully reliable car. And, sure 18 mpg was easy to obtain.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    4. Re:How to "fix" some African Nation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, let's get a few hundred million more people in cars, polluting the planet.

      Are you insane?

    5. Re:How to "fix" some African Nation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mobius Motors (http://www.mobiusmotors.com/) is trying to do something similar, though with their own design instead of VW's.
      This is a decent idea for Kenyans, as there is a large tax on importing cars, and less so on car parts.

      >>The car is perfect for Africa, where roads are not great
      I'm not sure you know how 'not great' some parts are, 4 wheel drive and a higher clearance are very, very useful.

      >>Its construction is some African Nation would raise the economy of the entire continent.
      There's a Nissan and Toyota plant cranking out vehicles in South Africa. The sell them to Kenya and other African countries.
      I don't disagree with your plan, just wanted to point out a lot of what you mentioned is already going on.

    6. Re:How to "fix" some African Nation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... It's called commerce.

      You think there's no buying and selling in Iran, Myanmar, or Zimbabwe? Commerce hasn't stopped oppressive government in those countries.

      Iraq and Cuba had American-style commerce and the citizenry were dirt-poor. Saddam Hussein was given Iraq to protect American interests but he nationalized the oilfields, and spent much of the money building infrastructure across the nation. When Cubans objected to corruption and American imperialism they lost small-scale capitalism and their main revenue, tourism: So they remained dirt-poor.

      No, the solution is education: Namely the ideas of secularism, welfare and infrastructure. For as long as each family thinks their religion is more important, wealth excuses corruption, and building the community is another person's problem; African nations will be warring tribes looking for a handout.

    7. Re:How to "fix" some African Nation... by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      The major powers are not interested in bettering the common African man, they are interested in resource extraction and exploitation. The reason Africa is so poor is: 1-Agriculteral subsidies have wiped out the local farmers. 2-Import duties have wiped out any manufacturing they might try to get going. 3-Any time they manage to do something right, the West comes in and takes it from them. 4-The West deliberately undermines (and kills) any local government that doesn't support them over the interests of their own people.

    8. Re:How to "fix" some African Nation... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      You know there's is more to a car's pollution output than just mpg right?
      If there's one thing I've learnt in my travels, it is that the car is evil. Any country without car infrastructure should skip it altogether and opt for pedestrian/bicycle/moped/public transport. it is the only viable model that can scale and minimises pollution.

  14. $6.50 is NOT cheap. by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

    The average person in a LOT of the countries in Africa makes less than $2 a day, the bulk of which goes to pay for food so they don't starve and they often have to subsistence farm on top of that because $2 doesn't go very far. $6.50 is laughable. They need light, pencils, paper and hell even electricity long before they need a surface tablet.

    But it's not like I expected Zuckerberg to get this. He's the quintessential rich guy now that doesn't understand the little people.

    1. Re:$6.50 is NOT cheap. by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Someone on $2 a day is outside the monetary economy. They do not pay for food and shelter with money. p. Do they need surface tablets? Hell, no - they need large format Android phones.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    2. Re:$6.50 is NOT cheap. by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      And I suppose you understand "the little people".

  15. the long-term benefit stuff by Dareth · · Score: 1

    the long-term benefit stuff

    You saying they are not quite ready for LOL cat pictures yet?

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  16. They just want to grow crops of wage slaves by Zeio · · Score: 2

    Gates and Zuck want to farm the entire human race for wage slaves. The oligarchs want to pluck the best and brightest from wherever they may be and utilize them.

    These countries need fresh water, a reliable food supply and the most rudimentary things for education, eg, paper and pencils. These tools want to throw keyboards at the world hoping to farm out another hidden gem like Ramanujan and pluck them like cheap underpaid fruit.

    --
    Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
    1. Re:They just want to grow crops of wage slaves by Khashishi · · Score: 0

      If that's what Gates and Zuckerberg are thinking, I commend them for thinking about the long, long term. Anyways, if that's the plan, it's win-win for future software companies and Africa. I suppose US software engineers might lose, but who cares?

    2. Re:They just want to grow crops of wage slaves by Zeio · · Score: 1

      I'll suggest something here. Some cultures have the ability to innovate. Some do not. No judgement. But trying to shortcut bypass and undermine the ones that innovate to get sub market talent does not come without a long term price.

      Do laud the rapists who take advantage of this because they have a huge pile of monopoly money is really sad.

      Zuck and Gates could make a few universities like MIT-Caltech-etc that are meant to home grow STEM superstars of the native born and re-invest in our country which is full of the people who injected the most cash into their wallets.

      --
      Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
    3. Re:They just want to grow crops of wage slaves by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      And I suppose you belong to the superior race-*ahem* culture that is capable of innovating, and you can't understand why anyone would waste their time with poor Africans who won't ever amount to anything. That's what you believe, isn't it? See, if you really thought it was about culture, it would make sense to provide education where it was needed most, since education is perhaps the best way to overcome deficiencies in the culture.

      Zuckerberg and Gates could invest more in America, but they don't owe it to Americans simply because they made more money off of Americans. (Or if they do, you should be arguing for higher taxation, not complaining about where they focus their personal cash.) As far as efficiency of altruistic efforts, it's pretty clear that a dollar will go a lot father in impoverished countries than USA, even when accounting for corruption.

    4. Re:They just want to grow crops of wage slaves by Zeio · · Score: 1

      "that a dollar will go a lot father in impoverished countries than USA"

      No. You cant buy efficacy in corrupt places the money and goods are generally stolen by local power brokers.

      You could do time and volunteer on foreign places, but neither YOU nor Gates would do anything like that.

      Race card, gotta love it. What a sad little brown shirt for identity politics.

      --
      Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
  17. Mmmmm.... cheap labor and customers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It makes my mouth water!

  18. Well why not? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    After all, they've done such a bang-up job on education here!

    --
    That is all.
  19. A knife to the heart. by westlake · · Score: 1

    Bridge's founders are challenging the long-held assumption that governments rather than companies should lead mass education programs.

    It is political and cultural suicide to surrender control of education to outside forces.

    There is always a reaction --- slow in coming perhaps ---- but poisonous when it takes full form. You only have to look at the history of OLPC and Common Core in the states to see the truth in that.

    It's telling as well, I think, that where the Bridge Academies post its Awards, they are all for entrepreneurship, not education.

    1. Re:A knife to the heart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a knife to the throat.
      No rich white man has ever done a damn thing to help Africa. I hope this is different, but why would the habit of 2 thousand years change now !

  20. Dr. James Tooley... by arpad1 · · Score: 1

    Is mentioned in the Wall Street Journal article although his book, and what he found in the poorest, third-word slums, wasn't. What he found was tiny, ramshackle private schools just about everywhere. Dr. Tooley's book "The Beautiful Tree" covers the phenomenon and how widely-spread it is.

    Seems poor people, when the government schools are lousy enough, or non-existant, simply set up their own schools. Whoever has the entreprenuerial grit and enough education to convince very poor parents they might be able to education their child, simply goes into business.Sometimes in contravention to laws meant to maintain the government school monopoly.

    I imagine Messrs Zuckerberg and Gates must have some knowledge of Dr. Tooley's findings else they'd have gone through the government education bureacracies as so many charitable organizations before them. Government education agencies are inevitably inefficient, typically corrupt and never accountable. I imagine both Mr. Gates and Mr. Zuckerberg, with their experience of trying to breath some life into the American public education system, understand the futility of trying to improve the performance of third world education bureacracies.

    The Bridge model seems to be following in the footsteps of those tiny, private school Dr. Tooley discovered and while the article doesn't specifically mention them it seems pretty likely that the people who've opened their own private schools already will be among the first to see the value of working with Bridge.

    --
    Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  21. Microsoft EDGI .. by DougPaulson · · Score: 1

    "Am in Redmond this week. Wanted to catch up with you, You might be aware of the work Bric team is doing on the proactive EDGI like proposal. Given the impact of Education market in India globally for us and the threats from Linux and piracy, I want to make this a big bet plan in India (post Novell – Sco and Trishul) ref.

    "EDGI is a customer-focused program that is for circumstances (like the one you reference) where an education and/or government customer is going to purchase naked PC’S or PC’S w/Linux" ref