Slashdot Mirror


Evolution Market's Admins Are Gone, Along With $12M In Bitcoin

tsu doh nimh writes: The Evolution Market, an online black market that sells everything contraband — from marijuana, heroin and ecstasy to stolen identities and malicious hacking services — appears to have vanished in the last 24 hours with little warning. Much to the chagrin of countless merchants hawking their wares in the underground market, the curators of the project have reportedly absconded with the community's bitcoins — a stash that some Evolution merchants reckon is worth more than USD $12 million.

54 of 254 comments (clear)

  1. Free market will sort it out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't worry, the invisible hand will soon make an invisible punishment for those responsible.

    1. Re:Free market will sort it out by Iamthecheese · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The solution to an escrow company absconding with the money in escrow is a tertiary risk market of insured backers.

      I support appropriate regulation as much as you do, but I have to point out that if the government wasn't fighting the drug trade they would be free to openly sell the risk. In this case blaming the free market is inappropriate.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    2. Re:Free market will sort it out by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is a black market a "free market"? How can you have any more government "regulation" beyond completely forbidden?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Free market will sort it out by Thanshin · · Score: 2

      How is a black market a "free market"? How can you have any more government "regulation" beyond completely forbidden?

      I don't know, but once they figure it out it will be first applied to sending a song to a friend. Which, unlike sending crack cocaine to any buyer, is a serious crime.

    4. Re:Free market will sort it out by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Informative

      it's free as in you have no rules.

      it's non-free as in you have no freedom to publish your identity nor does the other party publish his, so no trust relations can be created based on long term reputation.

      and well, free market will sort itself out, they figured out that running with the money was better business. maybe it was, maybe not, just another company strategy.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Free market will sort it out by jythie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the government was not fighting drugs, sites like this would probably just change which black market commodities they were involved with. That is not to say I agree with prohibition, but I think in this case it would not matter one way or the other since it was the profit motive of illegal trades that drew people in.

    6. Re:Free market will sort it out by jythie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That tends to be the problem with pure free market corrections. What is good for the market and what is good for individuals in advantageous positions often to not align, with aggregate self interest often running contrary to what is good for almost everyone.

    7. Re:Free market will sort it out by ultranova · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have to point out that if the government wasn't fighting the drug trade they would be free to openly sell the risk.

      If the government wasn't fighting some drugs the users would simply buy them from their local booze store with little if any risk to anyone.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    8. Re:Free market will sort it out by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      I saw a news blurb about the site just last night on (if I remember right) RT News (http://rt.com/ ), with one of the reporters showing how easy it was to buy stolen web banking login credentials... Could it be that the media exposure spooked the site owners?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    9. Re:Free market will sort it out by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      To be honest, drugs aren't the only items they sold... a segment on one of the sat news stations last night showed the site selling pilfered bank logins, credit card details, and in essence, selling stuff that no government would condone, no matter how hands-off that government would be.

      Sibling is right - if drugs were legal, the site would simply sell other illegal stuff.

      That said, your point still stands... it's not exactly a free and open market in there.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    10. Re:Free market will sort it out by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Black markets are often considered models of completely free markets because the government regulation is so uniform. "Completely forbidden" means that, so long as you can manage to actually exist, the market mechanics are completely free. No external barriers to competition and whatever tactics work: theft, intimidation, violence, offering a better product.

    11. Re:Free market will sort it out by itzly · · Score: 2

      See also "the tragedy of the commons". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...

    12. Re:Free market will sort it out by Whorhay · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That is correct to an extent. There has always been organized crime. But during times of prohibition their ability to make money has drastically increased because the law has created a situation ripe for their exploitation with a huge market. Drugs is the current profit center for most of the worlds organized criminal organizations. Yes, if we legalized drugs they would continue to exist, but they would lose their primary funding stream. With less funding comes less influence and we'd see a reduction in their ability to continue operations.

    13. Re:Free market will sort it out by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You missed his point. His point was that something will always be prohibited and they'll just move into selling that instead. It doesn't have to be drugs. Explosives and other forms of weaponry come to mind as items that are either outright banned or at least highly regulated in most of the World. Are you going to legalize and deregulate them too? Laissez faire for C-4? It would make the Fourth of July a lot more enjoyable but other than that I'm not certain it's a good idea.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    14. Re:Free market will sort it out by rjhubs · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The demand for illegal weaponry is not as great as the demand for controlled substances. Yes, there is no doubt criminal organizations would move to other pursuits, but they would be less profitable pursuits. Also, lets acknowledge the demand for illegal weaponry is already being met by criminal organizations. If you dropped the regulations on controlled substances, some of the existing organizations would try and become legit (we saw this during prohibition). Others would be forced into an already crowded market for dealing controlled arms.

    15. Re:Free market will sort it out by GLMDesigns · · Score: 3, Insightful

      NOBODY that's a proponent of free markets considers Black Markets to be models. Find where Menger or von Mises, or Hayek or Rothbard or Rand considered the black market to be something to emulate - a model, so to speak, of Free Markets.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    16. Re:Free market will sort it out by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 2

      Ok, so what percentage of the population really wants to employ a hitman? What percentage wants to run a credit card scam?

      How does that compare to the percentage that want to use an illegal drug?

      There is a huge market for people using illicit drugs while the marketplace for hitmen is nearly nil.

      It is completely appropriate to blame prohibition for the value of illicit drugs and popularity of markets which offer them because prohibition itself is a blatant hypocrisy in a nation where more than half of the population uses illicit drugs.

      The next closest market that follows the 'people use it a lot, but it is illegal', may be pirated media, but that market is already taken by torrent sites that require no cash payments, so it is hard to make a buck there

      Eliminating prohibition would wipe out a huge segment of the black market and send organizations that work in that space scrambling for a way to make a buck

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    17. Re:Free market will sort it out by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      But during times of prohibition their ability to make money has drastically increased because the law has created a situation ripe for their exploitation with a huge market. Drugs is the current profit center for most of the worlds organized criminal organizations. Yes, if we legalized drugs they would continue to exist, but they would lose their primary funding stream. With less funding comes less influence and we'd see a reduction in their ability to continue operations.

      That's only one side of the equation. Law enforcement and the legal system also benefit during prohibition (on average), due to the higher number of cases, asset forfeiture, police budgets, the prison "industry", etc.

      So both sides like prohibition. It makes them lots of money. The damage to society, on the other hand, is palpable, on both "sides". Criminals shooting each other in the streets, overzealous police departments, etc.

    18. Re:Free market will sort it out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Laissez faire for C-4? It would make the Fourth of July a lot more enjoyable but other than that I'm not certain it's a good idea.

      According to my late father, miners in the small town where he was born would steal a little dynamite for the 4th. This was in the 1920s. I'm sure the occasional limb was lost; but then mining was not particularly safe either. Of course those were "simpler times".

    19. Re:Free market will sort it out by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You missed his point. His point was that something will always be prohibited and they'll just move into selling that instead. It doesn't have to be drugs.

      For this high of a profit potential, yes, it pretty much does have to be drugs.

      There just isn't that much domestic demand for online sale of things like explosives and firearms. Dealers of any quantity would likely sell them overseas. Hell, as far as I know the biggest illegal domestic gun dealer in the U.S in recent decades was the Federal government itself in that outrageous Fast and Furious screwup. For which nobody has gone to jail, as I recall. Why is Eric Holder still walking around outside of jail?

      Likewise for other products. What else are you going to sell? Poison? Brass knuckles? Those are already available (in most states, AFAIK) in legitimate retail outlets.

      Lots of illegal things can be sold. But high demand + high prices? Drugs are pretty much it domestically.

    20. Re:Free market will sort it out by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      Do what you can get away with

      That's not a feature of a market. Because that implies deception or the use of force. Fraud is by definition a departure from the market (where the participants can evaluate each other's offers and choose whether to strike a deal) and a move into a mode where one party is making things happen and the other is being tricked or forced into participating or giving something up under duress or through deceit.

      In other words, you're yet another person who doesn't like to compete for business, and will gladly twist the meaning of words in order to avoid having to acknowledge reality.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    21. Re:Free market will sort it out by west · · Score: 2

      But the point stands: the criminals are not going to say, "Aw, shucks, we're out of business now that drugs are legal! Looks like we have to go work at Walmart now!"

      Actually, the thing is that for a majority of criminals, crime is just another job choice. They weigh (often very badly) what they perceive as the benefits and the costs, just as you do when you are choosing which field to go into. If they perceive that crime has become less lucrative or that the costs have risen, then most criminals will look at other avenues, just as you would when deciding what job you're going after.

      Now criminals perception are often not very accurate, and their workplace skills are often rather meager, but the fundamental calculus they perform is exactly the same. It's why as job opportunities rise, crime goes down. Criminals leave their current job for better ones.

    22. Re:Free market will sort it out by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It may be that they determined that they were too high profile now and they dropped everything and ran.

      It's about the smartest thing they could do under the circumstances, given that at a certain point, enough heat would be on them that they'd get caught. If I were them, as soon as Silk Road went tits up, I'd have started planning my departure from the market. Becoming the heir apparent to Silk Road also means they become the next target too.

      It is quite likely their hope now is that it all cools off and they get away with what they've taken in. As soon as someone bigger appears, the law is going to start looking for today's bigger name.

      Of course... the "vendors" on Evolution are not exactly nice people. They're hackers and drug and arms dealers. The late proprietors of this service had better hope that the vendors aren't aware of who they are, or they're going to end up with a pair of cement shoes.

    23. Re:Free market will sort it out by Some_Llama · · Score: 2

      "Or worse...underage girls and sex slaves.... I'd rather have the criminals trading drugs than people."

      maybe if law enforcement wasn't spending billions combating drugs they could spend it on busting sex slave rings...

      it's not one or the other..

      it's also MUCH EASIER to search for sex slaves than drugs, and if the country didn't shun cops because the majority of them are using illegal drugs, they would be more willing to help stop actual serious crime like sex trafficking?

  2. Ahhh by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 2, Funny

    I do enjoy the feeling of schadenfreude sometimes.

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
  3. Another Bitcoin Scam? by bobbied · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think I'm going to have a heart attack and DIE from that surprise.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  4. A black market was shady? by H0p313ss · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm shocked!

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    1. Re:A black market was shady? by Immerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why the hell are you using an exchange at all? Worried someone will mug you and steal your cryptographic key? News flash - they can steal your exchange credentials just as easily.

      One of the wonderful things about Bitcoin is it completely eliminates the need for any trusted third parties to facilitate completely secure remote money transfers, even internationally. About the only "legitimate" purpose for involving a third party are situations where the block-chain confirmation delay is unacceptably long (in-person purchases), where you're trying to ensure true anonymity of transfers rather than only pseudonymity (aka money laundering), and escrow services. And in all three cases it really behooves you to ensure that the third party isn't grossly over-leveraging their trustworthiness, and/or minimize the time that they're holding your wealth - regardless of whether you're dealing in bitcoins or dollars.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  5. Once again proving... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... there is no honor among thieves.

    1. Re:Once again proving... by flappinbooger · · Score: 2

      ... there is no honor among thieves.

      When oh when are we going to have an ETHICAL and MORAL bitcoin black market service?

      Come on! It's like it's just a bunch of criminals doing this stuff.

      Wait...

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
  6. Wait... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People dealing in illegal goods on a site that specialized in black market goods were trusting a 3rd party to hang on to all of their money?

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I doubt _all their money_. I think the site collects transactions and holds on to them for escrow until both parties are satisfied. So probably whatever the total current amount in escrow was what was taken.

    2. Re:Wait... by sunking2 · · Score: 2

      This is more about what happens when the people selling the illegal goods are no longer the mafia or cartel and instead is Walter White from season 1. In the good old days anyone who stole their money, real or virtual, would end up with a Columbian Necktie. That tends to keep the money handlers honest.

  7. Amount by sTERNKERN · · Score: 2

    How do we know how many bitcoins are lost exactly?

    1. Re:Amount by maliqua · · Score: 2

      reckon is worth more than USD $12 million.

      That doesn't sound like them claiming they know exactly how many bitcoins were lost to me.

  8. Round up the usual suspects by Marginal+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The people who run a black market are dishonest? I'm shocked, shocked!

  9. When you lie down with dogs by bulled · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You get up with fleas

  10. Re:Why is bitcoin popular again? by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's no longer funny, it's hilarious. It's hilarious that people still trust an untraceable, pseudoanonymous bit of data that's worth real money to organizations that have no bigger entity breathing down their necks.

    I have no love for big banks, but at least in the United States, the FDIC and NCUA do a good job of regulating the banks and credit unions such that the bank cannot simply steal your money wholesale and get away with it.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  11. I would comment on this but... by St.Creed · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... I'm off to set up a new marketplace on Tor. Apparently, criminals are really gullible AND use untraceable money! What a great combination :)

    --
    Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    1. Re:I would comment on this but... by itzly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Make sure you are really untraceable though. Making enemies with a bunch of criminals may not be the smartest move.

  12. Re:Why is bitcoin popular again? by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, this is why you should keep your own bitcoin wallet. Bitcoin theft isn't a problem with bitcoin itself. It's a problem with where you're keeping your bitcoins.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  13. Pretty much what you should expect by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Look at it from the point of view of the people running these markets. They have a finite amount of time before the FBI or the NSA crack them like pistachios. The longer they operate the more people will learn who they are. So unless the illegal market is so insanely profitable for them that they can buy sanctuary someplace where the long arm of the law wont reach, betraying the people using the market is just optimal strategy.

  14. re: black market by shentino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "an online black market that sells everything contraband — from marijuana, heroin and ecstasy to stolen identities and malicious hacking services"

    And people are actually surprised that they poofed with 12 million in bitcoins? Seriously?

  15. Re:Why is bitcoin popular again? by prelelat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think a lot of these problems are that it was an illegal market with people probably using a properly secured TOR connection so that they couldn't be traced. They got bored of what they were doing and said "HOLY SHIT, there's 12 million here, untraceable" so instead of the normal walk away, they took the money and walked away. You are going to run into this in any illegal venture, with untraceable currency, where the operator is unknown. Anyone shocked by this needs to give their head a shake. Don't drop a crap ton of money, to someone you don't know, who has no real incentive to help you out. You don't even need a regulatory body, just someone you can hold accountable. You are never going to get someone to hold accountable in a market like that because, well they will be held legally accountable as well.

    Hilarious indeed.

  16. Acceptable risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    None of the people who actually use the black markets are surprised. It's a gamble; 9/10 times I get military grade shit, 1/10 i lose money. To me it's acceptable. Nobody points a gun at my head on the Internets, only a bunch of dickheads at Slashdot that think we are all gullible. Clueless...

  17. Re:Why is bitcoin popular again? by DogDude · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry, but are there a lot of cases FDIC or the NCUA not making somebody whole after a bank or credit union collapse? I've never heard of one.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  18. Re:I read the comments ... by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... so far, and there's not one Bitcoin defender.

    What would Bitcoin need to be defended against, exactly speaking? Someone looted the coffers and disappeared. Remove the "and disappeared" and you get what happened to dollar and euro economies.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  19. Re:Why is bitcoin popular again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because bitcoin is secure against government seizure, and it's secure against theft. That is, barring the idiocy of letting someone hold your coins for you. However, I expect these same folks fall prey to wallet inspectors.

    Because bitcoin is secure against local fiat hyperinflation. Bitcoin, over the past few months, has actually been more stable than my home currency ($CDN), which has lost 30% of its value in that time.

    Because I can bring more than $10,000 of bitcoin into any country I like without needing to fill out forms or risk the government taking a cut of it if I forget.

    Because microtransactions are cheap, and big transactions are also cheap.

    Because it works just like cash. As a merchant, when you have your bitcoin, Visa won't call you next week and take the money from your account because the payment turned out to be fake. That can never happen with bitcoin.

    Because I'm tired of carrying a pocketful of change to put in vending machines, and a walletful of paper bills to pay for things. I'm equally tired of giving the debit company a major cut of every small purchase every time I decide I don't want to do this, or a credit company a major cut of every large purchase.

    But yes, one of the big reasons is fuck government, nobody wants to have their money seized because they are rich enough to afford a large cash holiday. But the bigger reason is to have a currency that you can treat like cash, that is secure like cash, but can work on the internet, just like cash.

    And, just like cash, when your money is stolen because you left it out in the open, nobody is going to cry for you. Life sucks, move on.

    What I don't get is why people blame bitcoin. Did you blame the insecurity of the US dollar when Bernie Madoff conned people out of $65B. Yeah, that's right, $65 BILLION, not $12 million.

  20. Re:Fools and their money soon parted by itzly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Users are not gullible if they realize there is a risk of losing their money, and assess that their profit is worth this risk, as AC explained above.

    Trade illegal black market items with cash transactions out of a trunk is also risky, and doing it with paypal or credit card can be traced by the authorities. Using bitcoin may still be the most prudent choice, even if it means that there's a chance you'll lose some of your money.

  21. Re:Mr. Schaudenfreude calling on line two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The bitcoins are secure in the accounts they were transmitted to.

  22. Re:Why is bitcoin popular again? by tmosley · · Score: 2

    Did you know that people have stolen dollars before too?

    Seems to me that we just have to give up the entire concept of money, since it is a thing that can be stolen from idiots!

  23. Re:Why is bitcoin popular again? by evanbd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fortunately, bitcoin allows multi-signature escrow. That permits the escrow service to decide who gets the bitcoins (buyer or seller), but doesn't let them run off with them. It's not perfect, as it can't prevent collusion between escrow agent and either party against the other party, but it does prevent the simpler forms of "just run off with the money". Why it isn't in more widespread use yet, I have no idea.

  24. Re:Why is bitcoin popular again? by Jherico · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because enough people haven't been bitten by this exact scenario yet for people to realize it's a basic requirement of any mediated market. Black and grey markets will likely be the last place such protections will pop up because the people populating the market are not bitcoin sophisticates, but rather fall largely into the criminals and drug aficionados categories.

    --

    Jherico

    What can the average user can do to ensure his security? "Nothing, you're screwed"

  25. Why are you storing your coins with them? by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    I seriously don't grasp why anyone would store coins with anyone. I can personally hold billions of dollars worth of coins a cheap flash drive. So... why?

    The whole point of bitcoins was that you don't need a trusted third party.

    So why are you trusting a third party?

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.