Slashdot Mirror


Apple May Start Accepting Android Phones As Trade-Ins

HughPickens.com writes Bloomberg reports that according to a person with knowledge of the matter, Apple plans to start accepting non-Apple devices as trade-ins as the company seeks to extend market-share gains against Android smartphones. Apple is seeking to fuel even more iPhone 6 and 6 Plus sales after selling 74.5 million units in the last three months of 2014. Thanks to record sales, shipments of iPhones surpassed Android in the US with 47.7 percent of the market compared with Android's 47.6 percent. According to Apple CEO Tim Cook Apple "experienced the highest Android switcher rate in any of the last three launches in the three previous years." While Android phones don't hold their value as well as iPhones, it still makes sense for Apple Stores to accept them, says Israel Ganot, former CEO of Gazelle Inc., an online mobile device trade-in company. "Apple can afford to pay more than the market value to get you to switch over," says Ganot, "on the idea that you're going to fall in love with the iOS ecosystem and stay for a long time."

148 comments

  1. Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They have such a markup that they can afford to buy market share. On the other hand I don't know how attractive a change would be though. I think that a lot of people buy one system and stick with it because of the integration. Either you use hangouts, gmail, google calendar etc, or facetime, iCalender, and so on. Changing from one to another would be a pain.

    1. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh yes SUCH a high markup....

      Ignore that the HTC M8 and the soon to be released M9 cost as much as the iphone 6 plus.

      But then we have the Samsung S6 that will only cost....... $899 to $1199

      So what it your point again? ALL cellphones are expensive as hell.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Changing from one to another would be a pain.

      And that is why M$ has market share on the desktop.
      Make it comparative, competetive and painless and people will switch.

    3. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by alex67500 · · Score: 2

      Yep, I was just thinking the same, and I'm a hardcore HTC fan. But the markup thing hardly stands anymore. It sounds like HTC and Samsung have decided that the only way to make your phone as cool as an iPhone 6 is to price it like an iPhone 6... :-(

    4. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we're back to the days of cherry picking the most expensive not apple vendors and using those to justify apple's prices. There's more to the android market than samsung and HTC, and they're losing marketshare to other smaller players that are allowed to exist in the android model unlike apple's ecosystem.

      My next phone will absolutely not be one of these overpriced locked down messes.

    5. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Apple had the most profitable quarter ever recently and is the most profitable company in the world. How do you do that without heavy markup?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    6. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by lloy0076 · · Score: 2

      I have an Android because my ex-Apple device got stolen at basically the wrong time between technology cycles and my pay cycle. I'd gladly trade my Android piece of crap in for something that does what I expect.

    7. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      I'd argue that for most non-business users, the main issue is DirectX forcing anyone who wants to play games to use Windows.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    8. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by itzly · · Score: 1

      ALL cellphones are expensive as hell.

      I just got a new Sony Xperia phone for $300. Nice screen, fast CPU. Works great.

    9. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we're back to the days of cherry picking the most expensive not apple vendors and using those to justify apple's prices. There's more to the android market than samsung and HTC, and they're losing marketshare to other smaller players that are allowed to exist in the android model unlike apple's ecosystem.

      My next phone will absolutely not be one of these overpriced locked down messes.

      Well at least he named examples, you just made claims so who are those smaller vendors who offer smartphones that have the same performance and are qualitatively comparable to the HCT and Samsung flagship smartphones, but at significantly lower prices?

    10. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Although the ecosystems are separate - some of the items you call out are one way. Apple doesn't let you use facetime, iCalendar, etc. on anything but Apple devices. The other items you mention - hangouts, gmail, google calendar - all work fine on both Android and iOS. (Windows Phone users don't get Google provided versions though). It seems Apple wants to keep their users so badly that they won't make those services available on other platforms.

    11. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      I think that a lot of people buy one system and stick with it because of the integration. Either you use hangouts, gmail, google calendar etc,

      Google was kind enough to provide most of those things for the iOS ecosystem as well.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    12. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ALL cellphones are expensive as hell.

      I just got a new Sony Xperia phone for $300. Nice screen, fast CPU. Works great.

      Exactly. GP is like a Ferrari owner objecting to the high cost by saying "All cars are expensive - just look at the Lamborghini. And the Bugatti is more expensive than the Ferrari".

      I still use a perfectly usable Nexus 4 and my daughter has just bought a Moto-G for a fraction of the price of an iPhone and that works really well

    13. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, ecosystem commitments make switching a hassle if people really use the web based storage and apps. Let's not forget the apps which you basically have to re download and maybe even re purchase. Can't tell you how many people ask me after they switch how to get their pictures, music, and content from one system to another. If your a switcher and go back and forth on what OS to use on a mobile device. I would choose as much cross support apps and storage as I could away from the native OS support. Don't use Google's cloud, or Apple's iCloud and instead use something that will not make you cringe when you switch platforms. I have had all three platforms of mobile (Windows,Android,Apple IOS) with all of them I choose a storage solution compatible with all three. For me it ended up being One Drive but it could easily be Dropbox, or Mosey or some other storage solution. The worst thing you can do is just assume their is a easy way to move from one ecosystem to another.

    14. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by rvw · · Score: 1

      we're back to the days of cherry picking the most expensive not apple vendors and using those to justify apple's prices. There's more to the android market than samsung and HTC, and they're losing marketshare to other smaller players that are allowed to exist in the android model unlike apple's ecosystem.

      My next phone will absolutely not be one of these overpriced locked down messes.

      Well at least he named examples, you just made claims so who are those smaller vendors who offer smartphones that have the same performance and are qualitatively comparable to the HCT and Samsung flagship smartphones, but at significantly lower prices?

      He didn't make the claim that those cheaper devices were comparable in performance. I'm with him. My Sony Z1 is good enough for me, and for half the price. Paying $900 for a phone that will last for two years - not for me!

    15. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you bought a Z series, the phone will self crack the screen and you they won't cover it under warranty. This happened to me, one of my friends, and a quick Google search shows it's not uncommon. I sent mine to Sony Canada for repair, and they said it wasn't a warranty issue. Even after being furnished with the following link from xperiablog and the BBC Watchdog report on their self cracking screens. TLDR; you get what you pay for.

      http://www.xperiablog.net/2013/11/08/sony-will-repair-certain-cracked-displays-for-xperia-z-series-suggests-leaked-info/

    16. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by gnasher719 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple had the most profitable quarter ever recently and is the most profitable company in the world. How do you do that without heavy markup?

      You don't get highly profitable by adding a huge markup. Instead, you have to do two things: First, make production of your product as efficient as possible so that production cost plus markup isn't too high. Second, create a product that is so good that people buy it instead of competing products, even at the higher cost.

      If you don't manage these two things, then a high markup only makes you uncompetitive, you don't sell anything, and instead of profit you make losses.

    17. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, why doesn't every company just price their products at several million dollars each? Sure sales would go down but they would only need to sell one or two

    18. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by bobbied · · Score: 0

      Apple had the most profitable quarter ever recently and is the most profitable company in the world. How do you do that without heavy markup?

      You make products that people actually want to by.

      People only buy android phones by mistake.

      I purchased mine on purpose. I also purchased my wife's I-Phone on purpose too... So there ARE people out there that know what they are buying....

      Now, if you really intended to say "Windows Phone" I might be inclined to agree with you, but they are so horrible, I don't see anybody mistaking them for an I-Phone, much less a "smart" phone.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    19. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      A 64GB iPhone 6 is $750, not $900. And those who are price conscious can get a 5S from $550.

      And they'll last longer than 2 years. The 2 year thing applies to people who have contracts that let them get a new phone after 2 years. Since we're talking unlocked prices, that's irrelevant. People will tend to use them longer.

    20. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I purchased mine on purpose. I also purchased my wife's I-Phone on purpose too... So there ARE idiots out there that don't know what they are buying and get piece of shit android phones.... I am one of those complete brain dead morons.

      Fixed that for you.

    21. Re: Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really need an answer to this question or you can manage to figure it out yourself ?

    22. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by iluvcapra · · Score: 2

      Apple had the most profitable quarter ever recently and is the most profitable company in the world. How do you do that without heavy markup?

      Right, but why don't Samsung or HTC have such a high margin on their phones? Do they sell at a lower price because they want to be nice to you? Or because the people who set the prices at Samsung and HTC only want to charge you a "fair" price?

      Their phones are just less desirable. Supply and demand.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    23. Re: Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well by mistake or just because they don't know any better. Obviously the tech savvy crowd tends towards iPhone. Likewise with the affluent or more educated. Still leaves a good market share for Android though.

    24. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 0

      Paying $900 for a phone that will last for two years - not for me!

      I had my iPhone 4 for 4 years and it still worked perfectly well when I traded it in for my iPhone 6+. The only reason I upgraded was that I needed the phone to be able to run the most current OS for development purposes. The good trade-in prices on the iPhone 4 were an added incentive. I had considered handing it down to my wife, but ended up getting her a Samsung Galaxy Centra from Tracfone, since we didn't want 2 phones on the same plan for the outrageous costs. As soon as I finish with my contract, I'm going to move my iPhone to Tracfone as well.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    25. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make products that people actually want to by[sic].

      This. The iPhone 6+ is the first iPhone I've ever wanted. It was the first time, ever, that Apple finally put something out there that is undisputably the best tech on the market. Every previous model was a generation or two behind in one way or another; e.g. even the iPhone 6 has a sub FHD screen for no reason at all.

      People only buy android phones by mistake.

      No, people buy android phones to either stay out of Apples restrictive ecosystem, or to get cutting edge technology that Apple decided you didn't need yet.

    26. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by jareth-0205 · · Score: 0

      Apple had the most profitable quarter ever recently and is the most profitable company in the world. How do you do that without heavy markup?

      You don't get highly profitable by adding a huge markup. Instead, you have to do two things: First, make production of your product as efficient as possible so that production cost plus markup isn't too high. Second, create a product that is so good that people buy it instead of competing products, even at the higher cost.
       

      Congratulations, you have just defined "markup"!

    27. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by erp_consultant · · Score: 2

      One PlusOne comes to mind https://oneplus.net/

      The reviews I have read say that it's a very good phone, and an amazing phone for the price. It starts at $299 for 16 GB of storage and only $50 more for 64GB of storage. I'm pretty sure this is going to be my next phone.

    28. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by MaximvsG · · Score: 0

      Agree completely, this is a no-brainer. The trade value for most of the Android phones people are eager to trade in will most likely be older and not worth much at all. So give them a few dollars and sell them an expensive iPhone 6. There may be some sticker shock though if the people attempting to trade in their phones are not familiar with the cost of iPhones. Don't worry though, they can hang out at the Genius Bar while they get over the shock.

    29. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you are an average smartphone user that uses it as a phone, an SMS device, a shitty camera, and maybe an internet browser.

      Then they are quite interchangeable as long as there is a way to get your contacts from device to device, and that's something that you have been able to do going back to shitty dumbphones.

      The Slashdot community is not indicative of the majority of device users.

    30. Re: Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say it in opposite. Savvy people don't use phones with single button, because they know or can figure out how to do what they want. Idiots buy phone with single button that sent You to START screen. And we played game of START with Windows 95...

      Yes, I know, there are gestures and several click shortcuts...

      "I" in I-Phone stands for IDIOT-PHONE or IDIOT'S PHONE and etc.

    31. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      That's only the definition if you fail to think about it for 5 seconds.

      Hint: there are different components in different phones, and different components have different costs. These costs are a component of the retail price.

      Yes, there is a margin markup in the price because electronics companies are not charities. But the price difference between an android handset and an iPhone is not all margin.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    32. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      It must be a kindness, because they certainly don't do much to update them.

      Google Voice was finally updated to support iOS 7 two days after iOS 8 shipped.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    33. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you have just defined "markup"!

      Congratulations, you just proved to me and the rest of the world that you can't read.

    34. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      I understand are running a limited by invitation only "beta" programme. Hopefully all they bugs are being worked out. Regardless that's a good price except it's financing some of the debugging. Perhaps the price will go up once they go full production.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    35. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because losers like you that buy the $59 Tracphones dont count.

    36. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      A 64GB iPhone 6 is $750, not $900. And those who are price conscious can get a 5S from $550.

      And they'll last longer than 2 years. The 2 year thing applies to people who have contracts that let them get a new phone after 2 years. Since we're talking unlocked prices, that's irrelevant. People will tend to use them longer.

      And the same 2 years go for Android phones - the difference is, the iPhone will be sold for a couple hundred bucks or given to a family member you love. The Android will be given to someone you don't like much or goes straight to the trash.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    37. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Apple had the most profitable quarter ever recently and is the most profitable company in the world. How do you do that without heavy markup?

      By not selling at a loss, unlike most others. And by selling more phones than every other company but Samsung (and being head-to-head with them).

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    38. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Apple had the most profitable quarter ever recently and is the most profitable company in the world. How do you do that without heavy markup?

      You don't get highly profitable by adding a huge markup. Instead, you have to do two things: First, make production of your product as efficient as possible so that production cost plus markup isn't too high. Second, create a product that is so good that people buy it instead of competing products, even at the higher cost.

      Congratulations, you have just defined "markup"!

      Congratulations, you have just defined "dumb" - there is a picture of you.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    39. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Or maybe for Samsung that profit margin is good enough and they prefer to increase their market share even if it eats into their margins a bit.

    40. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Older iPhones are $100, so it's not a fraction of the price, is it?

      What your doing is comparing your pinto to a vette and pretending the you got the same car for 1/10th the price.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    41. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Older iPhones are $100, so it's not a fraction of the price, is it?

      What your doing is comparing your pinto to a vette and pretending the you got the same car for 1/10th the price.

      Read the thread, the assertion was that "all phones are expensive" because high end Samsungs and HTCs cost as much or more than the iPhone.

    42. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      How the hell did this get marked as insightful?

      The COGS on a $750 iPhone 6 is less than $250. A 200% markup is a high markup.

    43. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      I don't think Sammy has anything to gain by cutting prices to get marketshare. It's good to sell more units but they don't benefit in the slightest by having a marginally higher percentage of the pie. From a platform perspective and drawing developers and mindshare, the Android share is the important number, and that's mostly out of Samsung's control, eating HTCs business is a wash and even at the prices they charge their flagship phones are still basically the same price as iPhones for the same specs and generation.

      If you're Samsung you have to ask, I'm cutting my prices under the prevailing market price point, so I'm going to lose X million dollars in prospective revenues in order to get more marketshare. So exactly what is an additional 5% of smartphone marketshare worth? It's not worth much of anything. it'd be worth a lot if you were selling that 5% of phones at a good profit, but you already sacrificed that.

      The whole point of marketshare is that share should give you leverage, like you get more bargaining power with sales channels, or you make it more profitable to sell complementary goods (like apps); you have Network Effects that draw in more consumers because of the perception that they need to have a Samsung phone over and above any other. But if Android is a commodity, and the phones are a commodity, market share is useless; it can be an indicator of your health in a competitive market but it does not itself reify into something you can use to your advantage. It's an indicator, not a cause.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    44. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Or it may just be that Samsung spends large amounts of money on things like factories and process R&D which they need to keep at full capacity and at some profit in order to sustain their business model. It's not like they're Apple who has basically no manufacturing capability whatsoever.

    45. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      This is definitely an issue, Apple's supply chain model is much more efficient than Samsungs. Like most west asian conglomerates it maintains a bloated, 20th century heavy industrial infrastructure.

      Why doesn't Samsung run its factories and supply chain like Apple? Because they're a byzantine Korean chaebol that doesn't know half the time if it's making a cellphone, a car or an oil tanker, and measures its success by how many little paternalistic fiefdoms it can sustain.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    46. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Lately there has been a backlash against outsourcing in several fields. It may just happen that Apple's strategy is going to bite them in the end.

      Samsung is like the world's #2 semiconductor manufacturer. They used to produce low quality products at low prices before they changed to a high-quality strategy in the 90s. They are no stranger to mass production of dirt cheap products at razor thin margins. That's how they got to where they are in semiconductors after all. The Koreans basically wiped everyone else out of that market, which has cut-throat pricing, including Intel and the Japanese. The idea is to leverage high quality semiconductors and other components across their entire product line.

      Apple, IMO, relies on product design and marketing to keep a hold of their market but I think they are holding something really thin indeed. They have already felt the pinch when the decided to switch their CPU manufacturing from Samsung to TSMC and TSMC failed to deliver them in the latest generation processes. There are just some things you cannot easily outsource without losing a quality edge. Apple is no stranger to a situation like this, they did keep their loyal fan base during the G5 fiasco, but not everyone is that gullible.

    47. Re:Commercially makes sense ... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just got Xiaomi S2 w/ 64 bit cpu, 1GB ram, 720P screen, excellent 8MP shooter for $130, works great. So why is quality smart phone expensive again?

  2. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will not work. Users with android wear watchs have android phones, so the trade-in needs to be inclusive of mobile phone. Too expensive for the users.

  3. Android today is like GNOME 3. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Recent versions of Android have suffered from many of the same problems that GNOME 3 suffers from. The UI is changed not because there's a good reason to, but just because it can be changed. These changes don't actually make the software more usable. In fact, the software is much less usable in most cases. And these unnecessary changes prevent beneficial changes from happening. Android's default camera software is still total crap compred to Open Camera, for example. Even when new functionality has been added, it's rarely about benefitting the user, but more about benefiting Google in some way. GNOME 3 wasn't developed with the user's best interest in mind, and I see the same thing happening to Android. Hopefully the Android situation is reversed before it becomes a disaster like GNOME 3 became.

    1. Re:Android today is like GNOME 3. by igloo-x · · Score: 0

      I use GNOME 3 all day every day for software development work, I quite like it, and find it to be perfectly usable.

      According to Slashdot, I'm evidently the only person on the planet who feels this way.

    2. Re:Android today is like GNOME 3. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try and create an icon on your desktop. Right click and... fuck. At least on CentOS

    3. Re:Android today is like GNOME 3. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Recent versions of Android have suffered from many of the same problems that GNOME 3 suffers from. The UI is changed not because there's a good reason to, but just because it can be changed. These changes don't actually make the software more usable. In fact, the software is much less usable in most cases. And these unnecessary changes prevent beneficial changes from happening. Android's default camera software is still total crap compred to Open Camera, for example. Even when new functionality has been added, it's rarely about benefitting the user, but more about benefiting Google in some way. GNOME 3 wasn't developed with the user's best interest in mind, and I see the same thing happening to Android. Hopefully the Android situation is reversed before it becomes a disaster like GNOME 3 became.

      That's your opinion, a whole lot of other users think Gnome 3 is a better UI with more efficient ways of doing things. If you don't like it go fork Gnome 2 and stop bothering us with your complaints about how unfair it is that things change. That's how the open source world works.

    4. Re:Android today is like GNOME 3. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly my thoughts when I upgraded to iOS 8.

    5. Re:Android today is like GNOME 3. by igloo-x · · Score: 0

      I honestly can't say I noticed. I came to the conclusion that having icons on your desktop was a bad idea before upgrading to GNOME 3.

    6. Re: Android today is like GNOME 3. by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

      I personally dislike OS or software which forces you to do thing in a different way than you used to, although it is a matter of being lazy for myself.

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    7. Re: Android today is like GNOME 3. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an excellent example of how GNOME 3 takes away perfectly good and useful functionality from normal users, in order to create a dumbed-down desktop environment for low-skill users such as yourself.

      Maybe this missing functionality doesn't bother you, because you barely use your computer for anything serious in the first place. But for people who do actually use their computer for serious work, idiocy like what the GP described is totally unacceptable.

    8. Re: Android today is like GNOME 3. by igloo-x · · Score: 0

      perfectly good and useful functionality

      Except it's not that useful, is it? The first thing you do when your desktop starts up is open an application or to and cover the icons up. Every time I want to get back to these all-important files, I have to minimise or re-arrange all my windows every time.

      But but super+D reveals the desktop. Great, but if I'm having to use special keystrokes to show my files, I might as well just use Nautilus. That gives me access to the exact same functionality as the desktop but in a resizeable, movable, stackable window that I can alt+tab to. Having the desktop act as a file-manager is just unnecessary.

      you barely use your computer for anything serious in the first place

      If your argument was worth a shit you wouldn't even have to bother with this.

    9. Re: Android today is like GNOME 3. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea behind square button on I-Phone is exactly this. It shows Your desktop full of icons... Apple UI isn't changing and never supported productivity. You always must start from very beginning... I can't say Android is like GNOME 3, to me I-Shits UI is like GNOME 3, but You are the experts in this conversation.

      Oh, and one question: Why are You using GNOME 3 (comes with Linux) instead of nice Apple OS? May be OS X isn't working nice with your Idiot-Phone?

    10. Re: Android today is like GNOME 3. by igloo-x · · Score: 0

      Does anyone else know what this guy is on about?

      I can't be arsed deciphering his post to work it out.

    11. Re: Android today is like GNOME 3. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a pretty clear comment. There's nothing to "decipher". Any literate person would just read it, and understand what it's saying. Are you illiterate?

  4. Very low trade in values by beltsbear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most people will be attempting to trade in phones with almost no value. The people who buy high end Android phones are Android fans and are going to be unlikely to trade for an iPhone. The vast majority of the Android phones sold are low priced and drop to less then $50 trade in value within two years, the time that they would be traded in. An iPhone that is bought new is typically worth 3-5x that at the two year point. The 2.5 year old iPhone 5 still sells for $200 on eBay in good condition.

    1. Re:Very low trade in values by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vast majority of people that bought iPhones bought them by mistake.

      Fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Very low trade in values by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Most people will be attempting to trade in phones with almost no value. The people who buy high end Android phones are Android fans and are going to be unlikely to trade for an iPhone. The vast majority of the Android phones sold are low priced and drop to less then $50 trade in value within two years, the time that they would be traded in. An iPhone that is bought new is typically worth 3-5x that at the two year point. The 2.5 year old iPhone 5 still sells for $200 on eBay in good condition.

      If Apple sells you an iPhone 6, they can easily afford to give you $50 for an Android phone that cost $50 when you bought it and that you used for three years. They probably lose $60 (because they have to pay for recycling), but if that makes you buy the iPhone when otherwise you wouldn't have bought it, the deal is really profitable for Apple. Of course they have to calculate carefully: How many people trade in a phone who would have bought an iPhone anyway, and how many trade in a phone who wouldn't have bought the iPhone otherwise?

      There's also the art of selling a product at two different prices; conveniently for a higher price and less convenient for a lower price. Apple can basically sell you an iPhone with $50 rebate if you go through the hassle of finding an old iPhone, or without the rebate without the hassle. But importantly, the official retail price is unchanged.

    3. Re:Very low trade in values by bobbied · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of people that bought android phones bought them by mistake.

      No no.. You mean "Windows phone".....

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re:Very low trade in values by fisted · · Score: 0

      The vast majority of people that bought iPhones bought them because hip and avantgarde and somehow magical.

      Fixed that for you.

      *adjusts hipster haircut*

    5. Re:Very low trade in values by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the following passage in the Commodore-64 Wikipedia page:

      In January 1983, Commodore offered a $100 rebate in the United States on the purchase of a C64 to anyone trading in another video game console or computer.[27] To take advantage of this rebate, some mail-order dealers and retailers offered a Timex Sinclair 1000 for as little as $10 with purchase of a C64, so the consumer could send the TS1000 to Commodore, collect the rebate, and pocket the difference; Timex Corporation departed the computer market within a year.

  5. Good luck by kuzb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple is trying everything except the one thing that would actually work - stop price gouging their customers.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    1. Re:Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Offering more reasonable prices is something a hardware company might do. Apple isn't a hardware company. They're a marketing company/religious sect that also happens to make hardware.

    2. Re:Good luck by beltsbear · · Score: 1

      How would that work for Apple? They are pretty good at figuring out how to make the most profit on their phones. Gaining more market share at the expense of profit makes no sense.

    3. Re:Good luck by iluvcapra · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Apple is trying everything except the one thing that would actually work - stop price gouging their customers.

      It seems to me like everything they do works great. This story kinda sounds like BS, very un-Apple, they've never cared about market share, except in the depths of the Gil Amelio/Mac Clone days, and anyways their actual unit share of sales in the US and other developed markets is increasing.

      Everybody just wants mobile to play out like the PC/Mac wars, and for network effects to award the whole pie to the dominant player, but it's just not working out that way. Network effects don't count for much anymore, "ecosystems" aren't as closed as they were, even the Apple one, and the most important applications, the drivers of growth in the IT space, of our era are cross-platform, usually web-centered. Android has a majority of the mobile installed base, but it's a worthless hill to hold. Things have reverted to a mean and traditional branding and product positioning are more important now, you buy from a company you had a good experience with, not the company that's logo-compliant with your box at work.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    4. Re:Good luck by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      More than that, I want there to be at least two viable platforms out there. A healthy Android stack puts pressure on Apple to make iOS better. A healthy iOS stack puts pressure on Google to make Android better.

      Who wins? We all do. I'd even like to see a better offering from Microsoft just to keep the other two honest. In a 3-way fight for my money, I'm the ultimate winner.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    5. Re:Good luck by kuzb · · Score: 1

      When you talk about "works great" you have to consider the present goal. If their plan is to grow market share it's not working great. They're losing market share because people are realizing you don't have to spent $800 to have a decent quality smartphone. The same thing is happening to Samsung - cheaper mid-range smartphones are starting to eat both their lunches.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    6. Re:Good luck by kuzb · · Score: 1

      It works for them for the same reason micro-transactions work. The more customers you have the less you need to charge to reach a given profit.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    7. Re: Good luck by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Yeah I don't think market share is a goal. I think they just want to make money. What good is market share if you have to sell at or below cost to get it, and the share doesn't actually give you a competitive advantage?

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    8. Re: Good luck by kuzb · · Score: 1

      Then you didn't actually read the post which starts with:

      "Apple plans to start accepting non-Apple devices as trade-ins as the company seeks to extend market-share gains against Android smartphones"

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    9. Re: Good luck by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's why I said I thought the articles sounded like BS. I could see it maybe being part of some kind of watch or tie-in strategy, maybe "we'll take your phone if you want to get an Apple-watch" or something like that.

      Also they might just be offering it just for the recycling value, it's not clear they're going to offer over and above the market value of the phone (i.e. "buy marketshare"), they might just be trying to front-run Gazelle's business. There are people in the article speculating that they may be paying a premium for old Android phones but nobody knows what their business model for the service is actually going to be (assuming it's not BS in the first instance).

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  6. Samsung by Ark42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've really been a fan of many things Samsung in the past (TVs, LCDs, even my Blu-ray player is Samsung) and at some point I'm going to replace my Galaxy S3. The S6 is now NOT an option because of things I really care about: user replaceable battery - I use the 4x sized ZeroLemon battery from Amazon), removable SD Card, and the ability to easily root (Not sure what Knox and stuff has done to the newer models).
    Is this going to make me trade in my S3 for an Apple phone? No way. Absolutely not. Apple is even worse with all these important features. It doesn't matter how much they give me in "trade in" it's still probably less than I could get just selling the phone myself anyway.

    1. Re:Samsung by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      Die hard Android fanboy exclaims how nothing will get him to switch ... Again ... Because we haven't heard the exact same thing from hundreds of others like you ...

      Apple doesn't want you, at all. You prefer things that less than 1% of the population even know about, and a hundredth of a percent of those people care about those features. People like yourself are statistical noise, nothing is lost by losing your business.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      learn to read, apparently apple wants his business

    3. Re:Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Apple wants the the business of the people that also bought the S3 and are looking to upgrade.

    4. Re:Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure , apple only wants "special" idiots

    5. Re:Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      learn to read, apparently apple wants his business

      Exactly! Money from Android users spends just as well as money from Apple users. No matter how you slice it, Apple is a business. Just because they act like their customers are special doesn't mean they actually believe their customers to be anything special.

    6. Re:Samsung by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Apple clearly doesn't make a product that satisfies your requirements.

      And you know what? That's perfectly fine. They don't need to. And you don't need them to. But the overwhelming vast majority of the market doesn't have the same requirements you do, and the products that Apple makes does meet their requirements.

      I don't understand why Apple's products have to be everything to everyone - no other company is thought of this way. Do people get up in arms because BMW doesn't make heavy duty work trucks? Should people not buy Ford because they don't make motorcycles?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    7. Re:Samsung by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      You prefer things that less than 1% of the population even know about, and a hundredth of a percent of those people care about those features.

      And yet, Android's global market share is over 80%.

    8. Re:Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knox by itself isn't too bad, and can be removed (except for voiding warrenty part). However, what's really bad is locked boot loader in new phones by Verizon and At&t. Either get developer version of the phone or go with Sprint or Tmobile.

    9. Re:Samsung by Ark42 · · Score: 1

      Is there a way to unlock bootloaders on the newer Samsung AT&T phones, or was the S3 pretty much the last usable phone in that line?

  7. People sell their new phones by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Too many people sell their old phones for decent money. Others (like my sister) like their two-year-old models with all their data on them and see no real reason to upgrade, so when they're offered an upgrade, they sell the new phone.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:People sell their new phones by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it make more sense to cut the price of their contracts? Maybe it's different where you are (Canada? I have your address somewhere...) but in the UK you typically pay £40/month with a phone or £15/month for just the SIM, same talk time and data etc. When you contract ends they offer you a new phone, but you can simply switch to a cheaper contract if you like your current one and it's always cheaper even if you sell the new handset.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:People sell their new phones by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You'd think so, wouldn't you? Most of the carriers here don't offer a discount if you own your phone outright, because it's a way to lock you in for another 2-3 years. After all, if you're not getting a discount anyway, might as well take the "free" phone ... but that's starting to change. People are not used to paying for their phone - it's "free".

      I bought my last two phones outright, and it costs a lot less per month because I shopped around for a carrier that does that. Most people are lazy, or they figure "free phone every 2 years", when they're paying more at the end of those 2 years, and can't just switch at any time if there's a better deal in town.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:People sell their new phones by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      TMobile here is like that here in the US. Cheaper plan and if you want to finance your phone, you can split your phone up over up to 24 payments interest free with the option of early payoff.

    4. Re:People sell their new phones by Maria_Celeste · · Score: 0

      Too many people sell their old phones for decent money. Others (like my sister) like their two-year-old models with all their data on them and see no real reason to upgrade, so when they're offered an upgrade, they sell the new phone.

      Others (like me) just don't want to put that much effort into it. It's a phone. If I can call people, check my gmail, use hangouts, use google maps, look something up, and maybe use the camera, I don't really need anything more. I can mod my Droid 4 when I need to, I think I could run over it with my car without too much wear, and it has a REAL keyboard. You can have it, when one of us dies. I have no time or desire to learn a new OS either. I use a PC; my Droid is kind of intuitive.

      Plus, the little Android dude is adorable.

      --
      The world is a stage, but the play is badly cast.
    5. Re:People sell their new phones by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Most of the carriers here don't offer a discount if you own your phone outright, because it's a way to lock you in for another 2-3 years.

      That's true only if by "most" you mean "only the three largest, whose business model is 'fuck over the customers as much and as often as possible,' as opposed to the dozens of MVNOs (and T-Mobile) that are better in every conceivable way."

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:People sell their new phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now only if T-Mobile's network and coverage were better. Sadly, it's complete shit here. Almost as bad as Sprint.

    7. Re:People sell their new phones by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The three largest have most of the market, both in the USA and Kanuckistan. The smaller ones aren't even available everywhere.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    8. Re:People sell their new phones by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Do you know what an MVNO is? Carriers #4 through infinity all piggyback on one (or more) of the big four networks; they are available wherever the corresponding big four network is available.

      For example, Page Plus Cellular uses Verizon's network, PureTalk USA uses AT&T's network, Ting uses Sprint's network (and according to the page I linked, apparently also T-Mobile's), and Straight Talk runs on all four (but not necessarily using the same phone).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:People sell their new phones by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Correction: I meant "#5 through infinity" -- apparently, I've been doing too much programming and I'm now applying zero-based indexing to real life...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  8. Re:"Ewwwh"....said some Apple Store cult hipster by itzly · · Score: 1

    "I could never get a Samsung, I'm creative"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  9. iTunes drove me to Android in the first place by enjar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I got sick and tired of dealing with iTunes and its many failures and switched to Android. My wife still has an iDevice and regularly gripes when they change the interface, move stuff around for no reason and otherwise make the design "better".

    My Android phone has no idea about my home PC because it doesn't have to. I don't see iTunes going anywhere, no way in hell I'm going back to the iOS ecosystem. I'm not likely to get another Samsung phone, which is what I have now -- I'll likely just go for the Nexus so I can skip the bloatware.

    1. Re:iTunes drove me to Android in the first place by Higaran · · Score: 2

      Getting the nexus is the best upgrade you'll ever make, I have a nexus 5 and it's the best phone I've ever had, especially for the price.

    2. Re:iTunes drove me to Android in the first place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting the nexus is the best upgrade you'll ever make, I have a nexus 5 and it's the best phone I've ever had, especially for the price.

      Absolutely. Hi performance, no bloatware, and root with your custom rom as you see fit.

    3. Re:iTunes drove me to Android in the first place by MachineShedFred · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I haven't plugged my iPhone into anything iTunes since the iOS 5 release that allowed over-the-air updates and iCloud backup.

      iTunes is a complete non-factor, and has been for years.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    4. Re:iTunes drove me to Android in the first place by enjar · · Score: 1

      Good to know that dependency has been jettisoned!

    5. Re:iTunes drove me to Android in the first place by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Isn't it though? I remember when iTunes actually wasn't a completely fucked up pile of shit. It's been a long time.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    6. Re:iTunes drove me to Android in the first place by macs4all · · Score: 0

      I got sick and tired of dealing with iTunes and its many failures and switched to Android. My wife still has an iDevice and regularly gripes when they change the interface, move stuff around for no reason and otherwise make the design "better".

      Nothing ever changes on your Android phone because it never gets OS Updates...

    7. Re:iTunes drove me to Android in the first place by antdude · · Score: 1

      For me, I hate cloud stuff. I don't want my personal on someone else's servers.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  10. hopefully... by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    ...they accept older phones and this works to mitigate Android's OS fragmentation problem.

  11. These guys are all idiots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saint Jobs himself said no one would ever want a 6" phone.

  12. Big deal for a mobile OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its really a big deal for when choosing a mobile OS and also a bigger deal when switching. I have known too many who foolishly made the switch without properly doing their homework and what it really means to switch from one mobile ecosystem to another. Its much worse then going from PC to Mac or the reverse. Many people still keep their files locally on a PC or Mac. But mobile is almost exclusively about cloud storage. Plus you may have invested in apps, content and games that may not easily move to another platform without starting over. Sure, some content now is DRM free and you would think that would help with the move. But many times people still lose pictures, personal videos, files and end up wishing they had stayed with what they had. Apple is no different then a Google or Microsoft in terms of trying to suck you into a ecosystem and keep you there. They make it very easy to accept default storage solutions and marry into their system. However, the divorce may be very ugly if you choose to leave. My advice, is use a third party storage solution and if you like your carrier, maybe even use their solution. But unless you really don't ever see yourself leaving Apple, Google, or Microsoft's ecosystem. I would choose wisely how you store your files and content.

  13. Hackers vs Everyone Else by BoRegardless · · Score: 2

    Until bricking ransomware hits the Android market, people who like to program and play with hacks will mostly stick with Android.

    People who just want it to work and play well with their other devices in an organized way will likely use iPhone.

    1. Re:Hackers vs Everyone Else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who just want it to work and play well with their other devices in an organized way will likely use iPhone.

      Anecdotally, my Nexus 5 works better and plays better with all of my other devices than my wife's iPhone. It's a lot less buggy (fewer freezes, application problems, etc.) as well.

    2. Re:Hackers vs Everyone Else by rivaldufus · · Score: 2

      It's all about comfort, I think. People often say "it just works" because they've been trained to use the Apple UI. The same thing could be said for people who argue that the Droid (or Windows phone) interface just works like it because they know that UI.

      I'm sorry, I don't think any particular interface is going to be intuitive to someone who's not already somewhat familiar with a smart phone ui. Apple interfaces are intuitive to people who already use an Apple device.

      I'd certainly agree that apple tends to be more consistent with the way they change their GUI over time, but I don't believe it's inherently more intuitive.

    3. Re:Hackers vs Everyone Else by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      People were saying 'it just works' about MacOS when it was, by far, the worst POS on the market (Basically anytime prior to X).

      It didn't have pre-emtive multitasking or protected memory. Any app failure required a reboot, but 'it just works'.

      It makes sense, when you realize they are just repeating what they were told.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Hackers vs Everyone Else by macs4all · · Score: 1

      People were saying 'it just works' about MacOS when it was, by far, the worst POS on the market (Basically anytime prior to X).

      It didn't have pre-emtive multitasking or protected memory. Any app failure required a reboot, but 'it just works'.

      It makes sense, when you realize they are just repeating what they were told.

      Actually, the "It Just Works" (which was never official Apple marketing-speak) sort of just appeared sometime after OS X was released; but the concept was around back in the MacOS "Classic" days. But in that time period, the concept mainly referred to the ease with which things like Applications, Networking, Printing and Driver installation and configuration was possible with the Mac, relative to DOS and Windows environments at the time.

    5. Re:Hackers vs Everyone Else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot...and people who just want to get sh*t done and get off their phones to do something else likely use Blackberry!

  14. riiiight by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    Because once someone can drag and drop photos off their device, add a micro-SD card, use standard chargers, and have almost full control over the phone, they'll definitely want to go to Apple.
    I just learned yesterday that there are two ways to get photos off an ipad air. One, download dropbox and upload them at about 1Mb/s (that's a lower case b). Two, buy a real tablet.

    1. Re:riiiight by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      Three: Photostream uploads them to iCloud automatically. Of, if you just really need them as fast as possible: Four: plug the iPad into your Mac via USB and upload them using either iPhoto or Image Capture.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    2. Re:riiiight by zelda64 · · Score: 1

      I just learned yesterday that there are two ways to get photos off an ipad air. One, download dropbox and upload them at about 1Mb/s (that's a lower case b). Two, buy a real tablet.

      Thank you for providing your expert opinion on a device that you 1) Clearly don't use or 2) You're too stupid to use effectively. You can attach an iPad to any computer via USB and transfer photos after "trusting" the device. You can also download one of many apps (I use iTransfer) and transfer photos via SFTP or to a network drive. But don't let facts or reason stop you. Please continue to flame a device that you don't understand.

    3. Re:riiiight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That assumes you have a Mac.

      Apple seems to think that everyone should make all their devices Apple devices. That's not going to happen. "Ecosystem" is already an outdated concept. It's about playing nicely with everything now.

      My BlackBerry does a better job syncing with my MacBook Pro than my iPhone does, by the way. Pretty sad.

    4. Re:riiiight by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Wait, are you saying that if you buy two devices from the same manufacturer, that they might work better together than two devices from wildly different vendors?

      CRAZY TALK.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    5. Re:riiiight by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      Yeah, wildly different...all two of them. 3 if you count Linux.

    6. Re:riiiight by macs4all · · Score: 0

      That assumes you have a Mac.

      Apple seems to think that everyone should make all their devices Apple devices. That's not going to happen. "Ecosystem" is already an outdated concept. It's about playing nicely with everything now.

      My BlackBerry does a better job syncing with my MacBook Pro than my iPhone does, by the way. Pretty sad.

      iCloud service has a Windows Client as well.

      Bounce it up to iCloud and back down. Or use something like GoodReader to transfer it directly (even peer-peer) via ftp/sftp, WebDAV, AFP, SMB, http (GoodReader has a built-in http file-server), Dropbox, Google Drive, etc.

  15. Samsung Android vs. "Apple Ecosystem" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a Galaxy S2 as soon as it was available, was flying through Singapore and they just arrived in the duty free electronics store. About 1 year ago or more rooted it, and re-partitioned the internal SSD so it could deal with Android's "bloatation" over the years. Then, proceeded to install Cyanogenmod on it. It was like a brand new phone, faster than my wife's new mid tier Samsung Grand. Nice thing about Cyanogenmod, is you really can fine tune it for performance even on the "old" Galaxy S2. Unfortunately, the battery was dying (was my 2nd battery since I've had the phone), and the Samsung store was going to take a week to replace it, so I ordered the battery (15$) from a Samsung store (in Bangkok) and since the Galaxy Alpha was on sale picked it up (I have two SIM's and travel lots anyway, so I figured an extra phone is probably not a bad idea).

    Now the Galaxy Alpha is a great phone. 20MP camera, people on this thread saying Android has buggy camera software are full of it. The picture quality is great, considerably better than my son' iPhone 6. It is a bit snappier overall than my Galaxy S2, but to be honest the difference is not that big of a deal.

    I would never think of moving to the iPhone "ecosystem", Gmail, contacts, drive, maps are all way to useful to me. Although I grew up with Apple II's and had an early Macintosh 128 then later a 512, the only thing I like from Apple these days is the Macbook Air (but running linux mint for work) and the new Macbook. As soon as the second generation Macbook is out with a bigger screen I'm upgrading and putting linux on it. The Macbooks really are a nice piece of hardware. As to the Apple "Ecosystem" no thank you!!!!

  16. Why would anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... want to downgrade?

  17. Windows Phone by KlomDark · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Strangely, in my little world, I'm seeing a surprising uptake in WIndows Phones lately. Never thought I'd see it coming. It seems people who have been happy with Android are wanting a little more, and are horribly confused by the iPhone's single button interface, and see that Windows Phone 8.1 is easier to figure out than the latest/greatest version of Android.

    Just my little ecosystem, correlation does not equal causation, but I'm finding it fascinating. Microsoft might still have some life in it. (Helps that Cricket is now giving away a couple different free Windows phones)

  18. OnePlus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or just get a brand new OnePlus One (buy any Tuesday from oneplus.net without invite) for a fraction of the price.

  19. User replaceable battery is pointless by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    You can get external USB charging packs in pretty much any form factor imaginable if you need more battery life (which you almost certainly will not with any of the larger smartphones).

    The time for replaceable batteries has long past, there is ZERO reason to cling to that dead concept.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:User replaceable battery is pointless by Ark42 · · Score: 1

      You realize how stupid it sounds to charge a battery with a battery that needs charging itself? Not to mention most of those basically hang from your phone by the USB cable, with no way to actually attach it to the phone?
      The battery I have basically replaces the back panel of the S3 with a larger back panel that doubles as a pretty good phone protector case too. Realistically, the whole combined size of the S3+big battery is no thicker than my wallet too.

    2. Re:User replaceable battery is pointless by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

      You realize how stupid it sounds to charge a battery with a battery that needs charging itself?

      You realize how stupid YOU sound when a replaceable battery ALSO need charging?

      Going from one electricity sink to another does not incur huge losses.

      And you don't even have to power off your phone to switch to external power, which you do with your slightly more foolish system of taking the internal battery out.. which is even more asinine because allowing one to remove the battery means it has bulk around the battery that is not battery, so your phone battery life is shorter than it could be...

      The battery I have basically replaces the back panel of the S3 with a larger back panel that doubles as a pretty good phone protector case too

      Wow that's almost as nice as the nearly infinite supply of iPhone battery cases that exist, which also charge the external and internal battery at the same time...

      What a Dorfus. Enjoy your short-lifed replaceable battery phones in whatever cave you live in.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:User replaceable battery is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a friend who has a case that doubles as a battery reserve for his iPhone 5/5S. It will make it a bit thicker and larger in size, but at least it will do what you are doing to your S3 without the hassle of the generic battery banks.

    4. Re:User replaceable battery is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it has not. I carry a spare battery and a charger with me, it is a Samsung accessory made specifically for the Note 3, it cost me $25.

      http://www.samsung.com/us/mobi...

      Ebay has cheap no name knockoffs in the $10-15 range but I wanted something I could trust. The combination is very small, only slightly larger than the battery itself and definitely smaller than a "portable" all in one battery charger of equal rating. I travel a lot, although the Note 3 battery life is outstanding, there are times it does get low. I reach into my backpack, swap out the battery in about 60 seconds, and I get another 18-36 hours of life. If there is AC power nearby, I plug that device in and recharge the spare all the while never having to restrict my phone to an external power pack within reach of the cord and the outlet.

      I don't have to plug something in and drag it around and keep checking trying to go from 7% to 25% so I can unplug it and use the phone again.

      I'm sorry you can't see the benefit of that. You carry an external device, I carry a smaller external device, i swap in 60 seconds with a full battery, you have to hang a cable off your phone for who knows how long.

    5. Re:User replaceable battery is pointless by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      An important reason to want a user-replaceable battery is that rechargeable batteries wear out after two or three years. If you can replace it yourself, you can just get a compatible one from Amazon for $15. If not, then you have an expensive "repair".

    6. Re:User replaceable battery is pointless by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How many people use phones more than three years these day?.

      Yes I remember getting those cheap replacement batteries back in the day... every six months...

      It's only $80 to replace an iPhone battery at an Apple Store. If you only have to do that every three years is that really so bad? That is not "expensive" by nearly any measure.

      P.S. I've used all my iPhones at least two years solid and have never needed to replace a battery yet, they could have easily gone another year or more without a new one.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    7. Re:User replaceable battery is pointless by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Troll

      iPhones have batteries that last long enough there are only a handful of times I've needed an external charger anyway.

      But when I did, I didn't have to power off my phone as you do with a replacement battery. Since a phone is mostly sitting in my pocket it's hardly an issue that it sits in a pocket charging.

      Unlike you I can choose an external battery source that makes sense for what I am doing, a replacement battery can only be one large flat form factor.

      You carry an external device, I carry a smaller external device

      Wrong. IF I carry an external device, it can be smaller than yours because if anything all I need is a top-up. A replacement battery MUST be, well, battery sized...

      you have to hang a cable off your phone for who knows how long.

      Which again is irrelevant because it's in my pocket. Since attaching the external source does not require powering down my phone I can disconnect and reconnect as I please.

      Also you must remember to charge your external battery which usually has no means of checking to see current power status unlike most external battery packs.

      *ALSO* with an external battery pack *I* can share power with anyone. You selfishly hog your backup to yourself, with no easy means of sharing it except a handful of people with the exact same model phone.

      And to top it all off, having an external battery means your device has less battery than it could. All around an insanely stupid trade-off given how little most people need more power.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    8. Re: User replaceable battery is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You chose to ignore many factors already mentioned. Having a second battery is a huge benefit. Repeat. It is a huge benefit. Because YOUR usage determined 1.3x of your battery life is enough does not mean it is for someone else. My second battery is always fully charged and i know when it is and is not. The charge light changes. I have the choice of and extra battery or plugging in a generic charger to top off. I more often then not choose to take me second battery. Not because I am stupid and never thought there was no such thing as a portable charger. Apparently you never travel or actually USE your phone for any length of time or never spend time in an area with a low signal. Without making up facts or figures, tell me how much space or how much larger my battery could be if it was not removeable. How much more time would that get me before it went dead? I'd give up space to have the ability to swap. I will NEVER be that person hugging the limited outlets on the floor at the airport gate or the one fumbling with my phone on a conversation with a usb cable hanging off it while pulling my suit case. You've obviously never had to do that though but only out of luck.

    9. Re: User replaceable battery is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same AC here. I'm at the airport today and i see many people with iphones hugging the outlets. every place with an outlet looks like a gathering of hipsters.

    10. Re:User replaceable battery is pointless by Ark42 · · Score: 2

      I think you completely misunderstand the point of the replaceable battery I use. I don't ever switch back to the original battery. The after-market battery I put in my S3 has something like 4x the capacity of the stock battery. It takes up more space and sticks out of the back of the phone. Because of this, it includes a case back that makes the phone a bit thicker than stock, while doubling as a protective case similar to an otter-box. I no more want to swap batteries in and out day to day that I want a second phone-sized object dangling from my phone by a tiny cord.

  20. I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why pay for a downgrade?

  21. OS by johnsmith2708 · · Score: 1

    Mostly, I like WP, because it is the most simple in use. Iphone always was expenisive and I think, that they it will never be the best smartphone!

  22. would be a downgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note 4 blows the iphone out of the water.