Slashdot Mirror


Costa Rica Goes 75 Days Powering Itself Using Only Renewable Energy

An anonymous reader writes with news about an impressive renewable energy accomplishment in Costa Rica. Costa Rica has achieved a clean energy milestone by using 100 per cent renewable energy for a record 75 days in a row. The feat was achieved thanks to heavy rainfall, which powered four hydroelectric plants in the first three months of the year, the state-run Costa Rican Electricity Institute said. No fossil fuels have been burnt to generate electricity since December 2014, in the state which is renowned for its clean energy policies."

4 of 317 comments (clear)

  1. electricity only by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Interesting

    or did they go all electric cars and boats too and start cooking on electric? they had a good rainfall.

    with this reasoning norway has been 100%+ renewables for a loong time(they generate more renewable energy than they use, and export the rest). sure, they do export fossil fuels too..

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  2. Re:And now why this can not be done in the USofA by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hydroelectric for some reason is never talked about for green energy. Because of the Hoover dam image. A large structure that completely changes the local environment. The problem is in america, we are still stuck on the idea of Big Energy large grids covering the nation. We don't think in terms of small energy, having a small community powered by modest green sources. And every community can have different sources to meet their needs. Solar is good. But some of us live in areas where there is a lot of tree cover (and cutting trees isn't really the green option), Other areas have a decent wind, and others are near running water. These smaller sections will in agragate may take up more space, their impact is actually a lot less, as a smaller plot of land can heal a lot faster then say plowing down hundred acres.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  3. Re:And now why this can not be done in the USofA by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Damming a large (or small) river runs the same gauntlet with greenthink groups as most non-petroleum energy sources: It is a bit of an eyesore and it alters the flow of a majestic natural resource. Ironically, environmentalists most interested in alternatives are the pickiest sort.

    I think it is clear that alternative sources of energy not only exist, but will be brought to bear once the easy-peasy carbons are depleted or no longer cost-effective.

    What everyone needs to come to grips with is that there is no energy source that meets our current demands without some negative environmental impact.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  4. Re:What a stupid piece. by Sique · · Score: 5, Informative
    It is renewable as the next period of heavy rainfall will fill up the storage lakes again - thus the energy reserves are renewed.

    You can still deplete your supply of renewables by using more than the refill rate - at least temporarily.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*