Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Developing An Algorithm That Can Detect Internet Trolls

An anonymous reader writes Researchers at Cornell University claim to be able to identify a forum or comment-thread troll within the first ten posts after the user joins with more than 80% accuracy, leading the way to the possibility of methods to automatically ban persistently anti-social posters. The study observed 10,000 new users at cnn.com, breitbart.com and ign.com, and characterizes an FBU (Future Banned User) as entering a new community with below-average literacy or communications skill, and that the low standard is likely to drop shortly before a permanent ban. It also observes that higher rates of community intolerance are likely to foster the anti-social behavior and speed the ban.

11 of 279 comments (clear)

  1. Dear algorithm by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty-headed animal food trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!

  2. I chuckled... by benjfowler · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... at the term "Future Banned User" (FBU).

    Isn't that just a nice way of saying "somebody our algorithm flags as a complete asshat"

  3. Poof! by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 4, Funny

    There goes Gawker.

  4. Re:This, if true, will utterly destroy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, well, they should definitely ban people who can't point a fucking camera, and probably have them arrested

  5. Research by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 4, Funny

    Researchers have detected researchers detecting an algorithm detecting researchers researching.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  6. Re:This is fucking stupid. by marcello_dl · · Score: 4, Funny

    > Trolls are usually above average literacy.
    Your right.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  7. Oblig XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    https://xkcd.com/810/

    Seems relevant.

  8. Uh Oh... by edibobb · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looks like my days on the internet are numbered.

  9. Re:This is fucking stupid. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Funny

    No need. Remove anonymity from said sites and the problem is solved. Better yet, don't bother having user comments everywhere.

    posted by an AC. LOL.

  10. Re:This is fucking stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Douché.

  11. Re:This, if true, will utterly destroy by Immerman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nonsense. Next you'll be suggesting that the technology might be intentionally abused to silently bias "unmoderated" conversations about [REDACTED], which would be a frightful step toward &^%- - -
    [REMAINDER OF COMMENT DISCARDED AS TROLLING]

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.