Slashdot Mirror


Officials Say Russian Hackers Read Obama's Unclassified Emails

An anonymous reader points out that Russian hackers reportedly obtained some of President Obama’s emails when the White House’s unclassified computer system was hacked last year. Some of President Obama's email correspondence was swept up by Russian hackers last year in a breach of the White House's unclassified computer system that was far more intrusive and worrisome than has been publicly acknowledged, according to senior American officials briefed on the investigation. The hackers, who also got deeply into the State Department's unclassified system, do not appear to have penetrated closely guarded servers that control the message traffic from Mr. Obama's BlackBerry, which he or an aide carries constantly. But they obtained access to the email archives of people inside the White House, and perhaps some outside, with whom Mr. Obama regularly communicated. From those accounts, they reached emails that the president had sent and received, according to officials briefed on the investigation.

58 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. One email found by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Putin, I know you are snooping here. Give back the Superbowl ring and Crimea, you thief. And wave Hello to Mrs. Palin for me."

    1. Re:One email found by florin · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Oh and good luck getting Hillary's email because no one here has it either."

    2. Re:One email found by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      "Oh and good luck getting Hillary's email because no one here has it either."

      Oh, what sad times have befallen Slashdot, when no one knows Hillary's email address!

      C'mon Slashdotters! Do that "my niece's boyfriend delivers newspapers to someone who used to live next door to Hillary Clinton once . . . "

      We can stretch it . . . a bit . . . !

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:One email found by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      I bought a hamster that supposedly had one of it's sibling hamsters purchased by the Clintons neighbor.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  2. Snowden is a hero by kwoff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oh no, these Russians didn't have a warrant? It's okay that Americans working at government agencies can unconstitutionally access my stuff, but now I should be concerned? Who the propaganda cares?

    1. Re:Snowden is a hero by approachingZero+ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good point. What's good for the goose is good for the goose stepping.

      --
      'I don't know what it's called. I just know the sound it makes, when it takes a man's life.' ~ Four Leaf Tayback
    2. Re:Snowden is a hero by lucm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't you find it interesting that this incident occurred while Snowden was in Russia? Maybe he gave them the White House wifi password in exchange for his 1-year visa.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re:Snowden is a hero by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

      the White House wifi password

      'admin'.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Snowden is a hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh no, these Russians didn't have a warrant? It's okay that Americans working at government agencies can unconstitutionally access my stuff, but now I should be concerned? Who the propaganda cares?

      I wonder how many millions of Putin's emails they have on the NSA servers?

      Oh, wait, but it's "ok for us", but horribly evil if they do the *exact same thing*. Got it. Pot meet kettle.

    5. Re:Snowden is a hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The GOP is rather divided on the NSA/Snowden stuff. Only two candidates thus far have said anything negative about the NSA while two others have spoken up strongly in favor of domestic spying. The silence on the part of other candidates can likely be taken as tacit endorsement of NSA spying (otherwise they'd choose to make it into an election issue).

    6. Re:Snowden is a hero by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Rather pointless for the Russians to hack the Whitehouse, the puppet house, nothing there but implied instructions from their corporate campaign donors. Want to know what the actual American government is doing, Russia needs to hack the boardrooms and homes of the US's dominate corporate leaders to find out what is actually going on and to be able to get actionable data. This to bring them down or to force better behaviour, lots of dirt there and of course even more in the tax havens positive gold mine of US and western government corruption.

      Want to know what is going on don't watch the puppet show, just mock it's subservience and incompetence (good people are more likely to be loyal to their fellow citizens then corrupt corporations), pay attention to the psychopaths pulling the campaign strings. Shine a light in those shadows and watch the cockroaches scatter no matter how rich they are and how much power they 'think' they have.

      The new cold war is US Corporations VS the People of The World.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    7. Re:Snowden is a hero by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

      Don't you find it interesting that this incident occurred while Snowden was in Russia? Maybe he gave them the White House wifi password in exchange for his 1-year visa.

      Oh come *on!* It's not too hard to guess, it's the same one in 10 Downing St!

      Scr3w7h3pr0le5

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    8. Re:Snowden is a hero by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

      Pretty funny coming from an AC

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    9. Re:Snowden is a hero by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

      Just before the whole snowden thing went greenwald, the gop was getting destroyed in the polls because everybody under thirty was voting for the dems

      The spring of generated scandals was effective, not in turning these people into republicans, but getting them to become disgusted enough with their government to not show up at the polls on election day

      The gopers do not have to publicly support snowden to benefit from his revelations because everybody who votes for the gop lived through the cold war and pretty much expects that stuff is going on, or supports it openly

      The 2014 elections, with a spectacularly low turnout in voters under thirty and clear gop wins, demonstrates just how effective the snowden gambit has been

      fwi, it is not the firs time that the gop has sold national security down the river for wins at the polls

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    10. Re:Snowden is a hero by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I thought it was '123456'. Maybe they have TWO WIFI routers?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    11. Re:Snowden is a hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Snowden is a hero

      He is, yes. Your continued attempts at smearing him are boring.

    12. Re:Snowden is a hero by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

      Hi cold
      Not drinking anything harder than gatorade, but you certainly have to consider this side of it:

      The righties were terrified after the 2012 election when the millenials all went dem
      Even young republicans were being interviewed and saying that they saw nothing interesting in the gop
      The common wisdom was that if people voted for the same party in their first two elections, then they would stick with that party for life
      Next thing you know the gop opens up with every imaginable scandal, IRS blocking teaparty pacs, NSA tracking down capitol hill leakers... and then snowden... BAMMO

      They got a hit on that one,maybe it was pure luck, maybe they drew it up from the start, but it is hard to deny that it was exactly what they needed to scare people off of voting. At least the newbies. Don't know about you, but I've seen a lot of this agitprop before

      Have a nice evening

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    13. Re:Snowden is a hero by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Hi Gary....,

      Interesting theory, but it leaves some ground uncovered:
      2014 was an off year election and turnout for them is pretty much always lower.
      There were many democrats that were more than a little disenchanted with the Obama admin.
      Obamacare was already starting to give people sticker shock, and it will get worse.
      With the Republicans back in control of the House they could engage in meaninful oversight, especially on things that were "uninteresting " to the Dems. The IRS scandal is one of those. (I consider that one far more dangerous to the Republic than the NSA stuff.)
      2014 was far enough along that Obama began to own his administrations record - no more Bush!!

      Hard to say how 2016 will turn out. I can't believe the Democratic party will really run Hillary. New scandals emerge daily - Clinton Foundations funding, fudged tax records, foreign doners, Uranium for Russia, more to come .....

      Have a nice evening

      Thanks, you too.
      That Gatorade is great stuff.
      Cheers

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    14. Re:Snowden is a hero by SgtAaron · · Score: 1

      Oops, they are smart. They just changed it to 00000000, hey, if it's safe enough for nukes why not for wifi router?

      The Football's password has to be "NoMoreJayCutler", though I might be wrong about the capitilization. My other guess is "CubsWillWinWorldSeries".

      Just a guess ;-)

    15. Re:Snowden is a hero by cavreader · · Score: 1

      Foreign Intelligence agencies do not need warrants or any other legalistic justification when spying on foreign countries. The only rule is don't get caught. While you may hear speculation about the Chinese or Russian espionage attempts you never hear them announcing they have caught the US running around in their high security systems and I seriously doubt they are so secure that they are invulnerable to outside attacks. While the world decried the US phone intercepts of foreign leaders at the same time someone released an intercepted phone call originating from the US embassy discussing the situation in the Ukraine. The origin and release of those recorded diplomatic telephone calls were questioned by no one.

    16. Re:Snowden is a hero by FMtRIS · · Score: 1

      You are right on and that is the actual voting demographic. It doesn't matter anymore about taking sides because there is one side then the other side and then there is the REAL story which we will probably never hear about.

    17. Re:Snowden is a hero by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Thanks kind of funny since the Russian army stil uses the goose step, and the US military never has. Interesting symbolism.

      To be fair, the US military does have a duck walk. Similar animal, just as goofy.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    18. Re:Snowden is a hero by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Not really.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    19. Re: Snowden is a hero by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You seem to be suffering from delusions. You should get help.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    20. Re:Snowden is a hero by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if you are denying the similarity between ducks and geese, have not seen a duckwalk in open ranks, or just have some sort of humor aversion.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  3. Re:Windows 10 Will Free Your Desktop by lucm · · Score: 1

    I was with you until the "high quality development tools" part.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  4. Unclassified security by bug1 · · Score: 2

    I heard one of Obama's unclassified speeches, it was on TV, does that make me a hax0r ?

    1. Re:Unclassified security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're not doing it right! You're supposed to be SCAAAARREED!!! Hackers.Hacking. Computers. Scary. YOUR PRESIDENT! RUSSIANS! HACKERS!!!!

      Aren't you FRIGHTENED?!?!

      THEY'RE FOREIGN! We called them *hackers*! Scared yet?

      Damn. Guess we have to find another way to make out this is a problem and you need to be frightened.

      Fuck.

    2. Re:Unclassified security by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

      They call pretty much anybody that can run a script a hacker these days

      In the old days we used to call then spies

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
  5. Re:Windows 10 Will Free Your Desktop by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was with you until the "high quality development tools" part.

    Last I heard, Microsoft's IDE was still broadly considered to be one of the best in the business, if not the best. Granted, their revision control system is one of the worst, so they're not all winners.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. A Blackberry? by VAXcat · · Score: 2

    What is this, the 20th century?

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  7. Goose/Gander by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the words of the great James Baldwin:

    The world has never lacked for horrifying examples; but I do not believe that these examples are meant to be used as justification for our own crimes.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Goose/Gander by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I left off the most important part of the Baldwin quote, the second half:

      This perpetual justification empties the heart of all human feeling. The emptier our hearts become, the greater will be our crimes.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  8. Spies are just spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What'd you expect them to do? They're just doing their jobs and keeping the country safe.

    Oh, wait, they're spying on us? Well then HOW DARE THEY.

  9. My question by randalware · · Score: 1

    Did those russian hackers read Hillary Clinton's email ?
    And did they save a copy ?

    --
    This is my opinion based on what little I know and understand of the rumors and lies Thanks, Randal
    1. Re:My question by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      and you know this "evidence" from what source? Is this the same as her telling you she screened all her e-mails to only turn in the work related?

    2. Re:My question by rickb928 · · Score: 2

      Ya think?

      As if Hillary's server was any more secure than the White House UNclassified system?

      If you think Hillary's server wasn't compromised by any government, corporation, or force that cared to, you are naive. It was surely pwned over and over. It was also probably so pwned that it was a good place to study the various attacks.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    3. Re:My question by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      http://politics.slashdot.org/s...

      Because Qualys, one of the top security scans out there, said her server security was awful?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    4. Re:My question by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      It may also mean that it was more secure than what the "government-trained information security specialists" would have done.

      Isn't baseless speculation fun?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  10. The irony... remember when he took office... by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    ... and his team laughed at the existing tech infrastructure? Maybe the previous administration got hacked as well or maybe the Russians weren't trying as hard then... but I find it ironic that these people that came in saying they were superior at everything keep proving themselves to be incompetent.

    Fuck the politics. Just remember back to when they were dissing the old email server/old it department and look at how much better the new people ran things... aka worse apparently. That's just funny.

    On purely nerd principles you have to have a bit of a laugh at the administration's expense. So much hubris.

    how many of the tech people obama brought along do you think knew how to defend against state sponsored hacking? I'm guessing zero.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:The irony... remember when he took office... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      In this case, I don't think so... I can't speak to every situation but on the case of the email... sounds like they were inferior.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    2. Re:The irony... remember when he took office... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      You're joking but someone is actually is going to be shameless enough to make that argument.

      And my eyes shall roll like slot machine tumblers.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    3. Re:The irony... remember when he took office... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      You still have people trying to claim Ted Kennedy was the greatest statesman to have ever lived. No joke. I always get a headache when I hear that.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  11. Transparency by edibobb · · Score: 2

    In Obama's transparent government, much touted 8 years ago, shouldn't unclassified email be public in the first place? Surely they didn't change the rules, did they?

    1. Re:Transparency by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I am still unsure that Obama knows what transparent means.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  12. Attribution by manu0601 · · Score: 2

    How can they know the attackers are Russian? I understand it would be nice for US government because it could help justifying the policy against Russia, but that will not make a proof.

    1. Re:Attribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please stop trying to reason about what the government tells the public about cybersecurity, it's just a ridiculous prospect.

    2. Re:Attribution by AnatolySokolov · · Score: 1

      How can they know the attackers are Russian? I understand it would be nice for US government because it could help justifying the policy against Russia, but that will not make a proof.

      Nowadays All is Russia's Fault :-D

    3. Re:Attribution by manu0601 · · Score: 2

      Not Russia's fault, but Putin's fault. It is always better to blame a leader than a nation, as you can gab markets in the later once you manager to throw away the former.

  13. So... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    No condescending comments from Barack Obama about how the 80s called and wants their foreign policy back?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  14. Russian hackers hack White House .. by DougPaulson · · Score: 1

    I realize the US establishment has a bur in its ass about Russian/Chinese/North Korean cyber terrorists, but would slashdot kindly not repeat such cyber BS on a technical forum.

  15. Good thing... by ai4px · · Score: 2

    Good thing Hillary's email wasn't in the State Department's servers and safety sequestered away on her home server.

  16. Re:Windows 10 Will Free Your Desktop by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Hrrmm Linux open source free as in air... vs Windows 10 free amnesty with the possibility of one day logging in to find I have to now pay a monthly subscription...

    Remind me which is the cult again?

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  17. Re:Karma by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Oh noes, don't read my unclassified email that is likely to be public record after a FOIA request!

    These are either the shittiest spies ever, or someone is trying to drum up nationalistic sentiment. I'll get worried when they're reading secure diplomatic cables that haven't already been posted to Wikileaks.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  18. That email from Nigeria? They opened it. by billstewart · · Score: 1

    That's the problem with being in the White House or State Department. Sometimes you really *do* want to read email from the corrupt ex-dictator of Nigeria.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  19. No problem! by penguinoid · · Score: 2

    If he's got nothing to hide, he's got nothing to fear.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  20. A private email server... by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    ....would potentially be the better choice here. Haven't heard anything that those were breached. They read unclassified emails, not great, but unclassified means that the messages contained info that could have been obtained otherwise as well.