Slashdot Mirror


Native Hawaiian Panel Withdraws Support For World's Largest Telescope

sciencehabit writes: Trustees of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) – a state agency established to advocate for native Hawaiins — voted Thursday to withdraw their support for construction of the Thirty-Meter Telescope (TMT) on the summit of the Mauna Kea volcano. The vote follows weeks of protests by Native Hawaiians who say the massive structure would desecrate one of their most holy places. The protests have shut down construction of the telescope, which would be the world's largest optical telescope if completed. The vote, which reverses a 2009 decision to endorse the project, strikes a powerful if symbolic blow against a project that, for many native Hawaiians, has come to symbolize more than a century of assaults against their land, culture and sovereignty.

286 comments

  1. More religious whackjobs by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More religious whackjobs blocking progress. If they own the land, or represent the majority in a democracy, so be it; otherwise a does of "separation of church and state" would be welcome here. No one should get a free pass on being a religious whackjob simply because they aren't a Christian whackjob.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    1. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The reason why these whackjobs's opinions matter is the US is an invading and occupying colonial power who has given the vote to illegal settlers and who has appropriated this Hawaiian land, manifest destiny and all. I get that all of the native American treaties are void and most of the US should be legally reverted to native control and the illegal settlers expelled; but natives don't have nukes or numbers only casinos at the whim of the occupying power.

    2. Re:More religious whackjobs by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are wrong. Having seen this in action first hand in my own country I can predict this has NOTHING to do with religion.

      Typically this is more about the gravy not being forthcoming to the local "leaders".

    3. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does blocking the construction of a telescope they previously agreed to help with any of that?

    4. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it means more funding for space based telescope, why not?

    5. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you live, but I'll bet half the people living there are also 'illegal settlers.'

    6. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Things shouldn't be precious or off-limits simply because "magic sky god" *or* because "it's really old" or "some famous dude stayed the night here, once". These things are all bullshit and irrelevant.

    7. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you sound a lot like a self righteous religious whackjob yourself... Believing in no God doesn't automatically give you a free pass to abolish human rights.

    8. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How does blocking the construction of a telescope they previously agreed to help with any of that?

      OHA is a captured organization that does not represent the protestors.
      They didn't 'agree' to it either, they just endorsed it.

    9. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The legitimacy of the entire 'agreement' process is very much in question if it's done under the rules and at the behest of an illegal occupying power.

    10. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Native Hawaiians had the misfortune of living on one of the most strategically important pieces of land on the planet. That makes them a natural target for any aspiring global power.

      In the grand scheme of things they were lucky to have had the USA and not some other power appropriate that land.

    11. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And who exactly should the land "revert to"? Are you going to base this on genetic tests? Should it go back to the first wave of polynesian settlers or the second wave? Maybe it should be purged of all humans and revert to its natural state? Or perhaps handed to the British? Or perhaps the Japanese, who would have conquered it?

      Settlement and migration are normal parts of human societies. The land I was born in changed hands dozens of times over the past two thousand years. The idea that the people who first landed on some piece of land have special dibs and eternal rights to self-government is dumb in the extreme. Hawaii should be happy that it became part of the US.

      On the other hand, on balance, I'm not sure the US is getting much out of it; so perhaps Hawaii should be kicked out of the union altogether. We'd sure save a lot of money in subsidies.

    12. Re:More religious whackjobs by jmichaelg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hard to worry about what happened over a 100 years ago. Had the issue bothered a lot of people, Hawaii wouldn't have voted to join the U.S. in 1959 by 93%.

      The "rightful owners" wouldn't stand a chance against whatever power chose to occupy the islands were they to secede from the union.

      It's hard to see this as anything more than a routine "pay us off and we'll shut up" shakedown.

    13. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Hippy,

      That's what happens when civilization meets stone aged cultures. They get taken over. It happens eventually to every aboriginal culture.

      HTH

    14. Re:More religious whackjobs by cavreader · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just how far back into the past are you willing to go to start righting all the wrongs in the world? Every square foot of land on the planet has been invaded and occupied by an ever changing cast of characters with the most strategic pieces of land having had their borders drawn in blood more than once. And the blood letting is still ongoing right this minute in many places around the world. The entirety of human civilization has been built upon might equals right. Civilizations get built using violence and get torn down with violence and that pattern still holds true today and will most likely continue to hold true until the planet is just a big radioactive ball of lifeless dirt. So how about you go start righting some wrongs perpetrated by people who have been dead for a few hundred years but I'd advise you to build up a significant arsenal before starting on your noble quest. Or you could just be happy with the fact that a small number of US citizens exercised their rights to stop a construction project on land they would rather keep the way it is. It doesn't really matter why they were against the project but I have seen people do the exact same thing to keep a strip mall from being built on land near where they live just to keep the traffic down. No need of sacred burial grounds or state sovereignty issues to bolster their arguments.

    15. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      > And who exactly should the land "revert to"? Are you going to base this on genetic tests?

      Just because the answers are complicated and messy does not mean the rights of the people should be abdicated. That's the seductive logic of authoritarianism.

      Now, if the USA officially endorsed the philosophy that "might makes right" your ideas would have some standing. But we do not. That is one of the reasons we believe ourselves to be better than countries like North Korea, Russia and China. Perhaps you would prefer living in a place like that?

    16. Re:More religious whackjobs by Damarkus13 · · Score: 1

      And if the land was stolen from them in an admitted illegal coup? [wikipedia.org]

      This, unfortunately, is not a rare occurrence.

      However, the fact that they voted 94% for statehood in 1954 suggests that Hawaii's current state of affairs is quite nuanced.

    17. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't so much about religion as about the long history of oppression of native hawaiians.

      Native Hawaiians are not "oppressed"; they are citizens of the United States like everybody else.

      They are many things and one of them is a symbol of the sovereignty that was stolen from the rightful owners of the land.

      The first Hawaiian settlers came in a few waves starting around 300 AD. They were frequently at war with each other over land, and if you have Hawaiian blood in you, you're likely part of a group that took the land you think you have a right to from others. But what's your claim based on anyway? Even if you were a pure Hawaiian, you probably wouldn't have been part of the royal family. But there are no pure Hawaiians anymore; you are both native Hawaiian and oppressor in one person. Your choice of viewing yourself as part of the oppressed, instead of part of the oppressor is arbitrary.

      But your entire claim is ridiculous anyway; what the Hawaiians experiencing is what every European region has experienced for thousands of years. Rather than indulge in your self-defeating racist ideology, learn from history and learn to recognize what an opportunity it is to be able to move freely in a nation like the US.

    18. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace "desecrate one of their most holy places" with "destroy an important historical/cultural site".

      Means pretty much the same thing, right?

      Are they a still a bunch of whackjobs if you use the second argument instead?

      Just because they're claiming the telescope is destroying a significant religious site, that doesn't mean they actually believe they'll incur the wrath of "the ancient spirits" or whatnot. It's a part of their culture and history.

    19. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current "native" Hawaiians evaded and killed the prior residents of the Islands. And on it goes.

    20. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Hawaii wouldn't have voted to join the U.S. in 1959 by 93%.

      Out of a population of 600,000 only 140,000 voted for statehood. Including tens of thousands of US military servicemen.

      Can you say voter disenfranchisement and ballot stuffing?

      Furthermore, in 1993 Congress and the President acknowledged that fact in public law 103-150 where they declared:

      the indigenous Hawaiian people never directly relinquished their claims to their inherent sovereignty as a people or over their national lands to the United States, either through their monarchy or through a plebiscite or referendum;

      When just 20 years ago both governing branches of the US government acknowledged the vote was not representative, it is pretty arrogant of you to claim otherwise.

    21. Re:More religious whackjobs by chipschap · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, on balance, I'm not sure the US is getting much out of it; so perhaps Hawaii should be kicked out of the union altogether. We'd sure save a lot of money in subsidies.

      I live in Hawai`i (though not a native Hawaiian), and I'd like to know what those subsidies are that other states don't also get. The chart here:

      http://www.theatlantic.com/bus...

      shows Hawai`i ranked 29th in the "givers and takers" calculation, in other words, right in the middle of the pack.

    22. Re:More religious whackjobs by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Hard to worry about what happened over a 100 years ago. Had the issue bothered a lot of people, Hawaii wouldn't have voted to join the U.S. in 1959 by 93%.

      It should be noted that the vote to join the USA was a popular vote by the Japanese citizens, the Chinese citizens, the Parsee citizens, the White citizens, and the Black citizens. The natives didn't have much say at all, since they are a teeny, tiny fraction of the population....

      For those who are interested in such things, racial politics are...unusual (by American standards) there - the Parsees and Chinese are on top, then the Japanese, then the Whites, then the Blacks. The natives are somewhere down below there.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    23. Re:More religious whackjobs by CanEHdian · · Score: 1

      In the grand scheme of things they were lucky to have had the USA and not some other power appropriate that land.

      Exactly, otherwise there would have been several trade agreements containing Investor-state dispute settlements and they'd have their native asses sued off (in front of a secretive tribunal, of course).

      --
      When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    24. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, where did you make that up from?

      Just because you believe in a majority religion with special perks in your country doesn't mean you get to just make shit up about other people. Your religion, sure, it's a load of fantasy tales of fiction anyway, so go ahead, make up what that book "really means" just like every other of the hundreds of sects of your religion.

      Just don't do it to other people. People really DO exist and have actual feelings. Fictitious characters don't. Their authors and fans do, but their offence is second-hand offence.

    25. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We not a democracy with majorty rule damnit. We were founded as a constitutional republic. Democracy is mob rule.

    26. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea what you are talking about.
      Parsis are such a small minority in Hawaii that they barely even register.

      The people who voted for statehood were mostly white. Nearly every other ethnic group you mentioned were primarily employed as plantation labor and few even registered.

    27. Re:More religious whackjobs by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 2

      I would suggest that Hawaii's strategic place in the Pacific has lead to a considerable influx of military money, military personnel and associated increase in the economy related to it

      The Philippines, which had demanded that the US Navy abandon Subic Bay in the 90's, is welcoming the of the US Navy's return with open arms because of the boost to the economy
      http://www.stripes.com/news/us...

      Sure, it is nice to harbor old-timey notions and traditions, but be careful that they do not have long term downsides

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    28. Re:More religious whackjobs by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "The reason why these whackjobs's opinions matter is the US is an invading and occupying colonial power"

      And if the Sandwich Islands had remained in the British Empire, or had become part of China or Japan, would the status of Native claims have been handled differently? How would one say, "F*cking haole" in Chinese?

    29. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Philippines, which had demanded that the US Navy abandon Subic Bay in the 90's, is welcoming the of the US Navy's return with open arms because of the boost to the economy

      No. While that might be a nice side-effect. The main reason the Philippines is welcoming the US military is because of China. China has everyone in the area, not just the Philippines, concerned because of their expanding claims on the south china sea.

    30. Re:More religious whackjobs by khallow · · Score: 1

      Just because the answers are complicated and messy does not mean the rights of the people should be abdicated. That's the seductive logic of authoritarianism.

      Or nonexistent. Of course, I don't see a problem that needs fixing either.

    31. Re:More religious whackjobs by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

      I suppose that opinion matters if you are talking to people in Manilla, Palawan or Subic Bay as to what they think the primary benefit is

      Chinese encroachment is the primary reason, same with Vietnam, for local governments to welcome a US presence, but localized economic improvement is a benefit for the people who are local to wherever the US decides to drop anchor

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    32. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You write in the form of disputing what I said, but the content of your words affirms my point - it wouldn't be happening if it weren't for China. The local benefits weren't enough to keep the US from being evicted. They certainly aren't enough to be bringing them back.

    33. Re:More religious whackjobs by murdocj · · Score: 2

      Well, no, otherwise they would have been deliberately starved, exterminated, and the remaining population dispersed around the empire. They sure wouldn't have to worry about lawsuits.

    34. Re:More religious whackjobs by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Native Hawaiians had the misfortune of living on one of the most strategically important pieces of land on the planet.

      How is that a "misfortune"? They are better off than anyone else in Polynesia, and have one of the highest standards of living in the world. If they want to stick to the old ways and try to eke out a living by trying to grow taro in volcanic ash, they can still do so. Yet for some strange reason, few choose to do that.

    35. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom of religion is a basic human right:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_religion#Early_laws_and_legal_guarantees_for_religious_freedom

      I suggest you educate yourself on religious intolerance:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_intolerance

      So, again, being atheist or disrespecting other people's beliefs doesn't give you a free pass to to ignore human rights, as promoting destruction of a place people consider "sacred" or whatever would certainly be considered. Why do we refrain from bulldozing the Parthenon or the taj mahal to build a telescope?

      I'm agnostic, so save your hate for whatever religious people you're up against, but know full well that you sound just as self righteous and simple minded as those whack-jobs do...

    36. Re:More religious whackjobs by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

      Political issues in Manilla had a lot to do with abandoning Subic Bay. Locals clashed with bused-in supporters because they did not want to lose the money from the base. Those issues have been largely overwhelmed by fear about China these days

      The Philippines is a vast, diverse country that does not make an easy one-for-one comparison with Hawaii.
      I believe that is is easier to compare the entirety of Hawaii to Subic Bay's local province of Zambales than it is to compare Hawaii to the entire Philippines

      While I agree that China is forcing US and their allies to support a larger military in the region, I would also state that the localized benefit to Subic Bay or the Hawaiian islands matters most to the people who live close to the bases

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    37. Re:More religious whackjobs by chipschap · · Score: 1

      I would suggest that Hawaii's strategic place in the Pacific has lead to a considerable influx of military money, military personnel and associated increase in the economy related to it

      Absolutely correct, and as I understand it military is second only to tourism in importance in Hawai`i's economy. However, the "givers and takers" chart supposedly takes that into account, although I certainly admit military money is really important. Hawai`i's economy isn't terribly diversified.

    38. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because the answers are complicated and messy

      There is nothing complicated and messy about the answers: you don't get claims to land or other people's property because you believe yourself to be part of a particular race or have small bits of genetic material from some ancient invaders. If you or other Hawaiians have specific, individual legal claims about something taken from your family, go make them, that's what we have a legal system for.

      does not mean the rights of the people should be abdicated

      Which rights? Which people?

      That's the seductive logic of authoritarianism.

      Authoritarianism is what Hawaiians lived under before they became part of the US, and authoritarianism is what they would revert to if they returned to their pre-US society. In the US, Hawaiians live under a democracy. Now, it would be nice if our democracy were more liberal and individualistic, but it's still a hell of a lot better than what Hawaiians had before.

      Now, if the USA officially endorsed the philosophy that "might makes right" your ideas would have some standing. But we do not.

      Hawaiians are citizens of the US, with the same rights as everybody else. And the vast majority of people living in Hawaii do not want to secede.

    39. Re:More religious whackjobs by Livius · · Score: 1

      Those ideas are unconnected. The whackjobs' opinions still don't matter.

    40. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is or at least was a great plaque in Iao Valley State Park on Maui. It talks about how early Polynesians brought food plants with them, but they were not invasive species because Polynesians brought them and not Europeans.

      Thinking about it still causes me to laugh.

    41. Re:More religious whackjobs by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      I would suggest that Hawaii's strategic place in the Pacific has lead to a considerable influx of military money, military personnel and associated increase in the economy related to it

      Just remember, all that "military money, military personnel and associated increase in the economy" also comes with a decrease in quality of life.

      Just take a look at Fayettevlle, North Carolina. It's got all the wonderful benefits of having Fort Bragg, and yet it's one of the least desirable places to live in the entire United States. Drugs, prostitution, crime and it's entirely because of its proximity to Ft Bragg.

      Having a bunch of "military money" and twenty-somethings who are away from home for the first time and have a steady paycheck for the first time could turn even paradise into a shithole.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    42. Re:More religious whackjobs by Sam36 · · Score: 0

      Actually, "separation of church and state" is not in the constitution. And in the original context, it was against what brought people to America in the first place: a state run church. The phase was meant to keep the state out of the church, not the church out of the state.

      When a nation turns its back against God, the church, and its citizens (abortion), it is all down hill from there.

    43. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of them are so fat now days, they can't drag their lazy asses to Mauna Kea, never mind the top of Mauna Kea.

    44. Re: More religious whackjobs by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 3, Funny

      Illegal my ass. We occupied and annexed it fair and square, replacing tribal savagery where might made right on the scale of every day life with actual laws and courts and civilized institutions. The fact that we also brought modern religion (that is to say a small-L liberal judeo-christian tradition) to replace this "the colors of the wind" bullshit is all the more icing on the cake.

    45. Re:More religious whackjobs by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

      Yes, it has a lot to do with how the money is spent
      At a purely surface level, Hawaii is largely Dem and North Carolina is largely Rep
      It has a lot to do with quality of life, particularly for the people who live around military bases

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    46. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is that a "misfortune"? They are better off than anyone else in Polynesia, and have one of the highest standards of living in the world.

      Don't make the mistake of confusing native hawaiians with all residents. Natives as a group have the lowest standard of living in the state.

    47. Re: More religious whackjobs by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 0

      This is true. Daniel Inouye used to rule those mountaintops with an iron fist. I hear through my grapevine that he nixed an upgrade to make some of the military's satellite tracking telescopes up there back in the 80s because the automation would have cost some of the native Hawaiian telescope operators their jobs.

    48. Re: More religious whackjobs by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      True, but/and the reason for keeping the state and church apart is so that you the free citizen can run your life in a way compatible with your understanding of God, for there is no real meaningful godliness without a real chance at failure. If the church has a say in public policy, that takes away some of your ability to make the correct choice.

    49. Re:More religious whackjobs by hey! · · Score: 2

      In the neighborhood were I grew up there was a row of houses that were built on a paper street that had yet to be built. All those houses were accessed via temporary easements running over lots on the adjacent street. But after selling all the houses on the paper street the developer disappeared and nobody wanted to pay for the actual building of the paper street. The people who lived on the paper street just used the theoretically temporary easements on a practically permanent basis.

      Once a year the owners of the adjacent lots would erect a temporary fence across the easement to prove that they hadn't legally abandoned their claim over the land. On that day the people who lived on the paper street had to ask permission to cross their neighbors' land. When I was a kid this had been going on longer than anyone in the neighborhood could remember -- judging from the age of the houses maybe thirty years -- but every year those neighbors would put those fences up in the hope that some day the paper street would be built and the easements would cease.

      Of course the legal technicalities with the Hawaii telescopes are probably different, but the political principle is the same. If you don't assert your claims periodically, people will argue that you've abandoned them. And I suppose that Hawaiian natives are allowed to have politics like everyone else. Maybe sometimes there are more telescope friendly people in charge, and other times more native-rights assertive people.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    50. Re: More religious whackjobs by prof_robinson · · Score: 0

      And no one should persecute "whackjobs" just because they're christian...but that's why you do it, right?

    51. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Freedom of religion is a basic human right:

      Indeed. However, religion should always abide by the law. Alternatively, be prepared to have Sharia in your backyard.

    52. Re:More religious whackjobs by hey! · · Score: 2

      And of course it's even a *better* deal for the USA. We get to govern the place, put our military on it, claim the adjacent territorial waters, tax the people who live there etc., in return for the symbolic pretense that we're doing it according to ethical and legal principles. That's the deal.

      Occasionally the pretense of principle presents some minor restrictions on what we do, but in that very same grand scheme of things it's still a pretty sweet deal.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    53. Re:More religious whackjobs by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      That's the bad part of the slew of modern colonial land grabs. They took the land and moved in but failed to exterminate the natives. Now Israel is in a constant state of war that is unlikely to end for centuries at least, and there are probably half a dozen if not a lot more native communities in a constant state of being continually victimized by their colonial overlords while also leaching resources off this majority and far more harmful fragmenting people. The Native continuities in Canada are neither good for the natives nor the settlers who moved in.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    54. Re:More religious whackjobs by paiute · · Score: 1, Interesting

      if the USA officially endorsed the philosophy that "might makes right" your ideas would have some standing. But we do not.

      Have you seen our national seal? An eagle with arrows and olive branches. We dictate the terms of peace because we have the weapons to do so.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    55. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every square foot of land on the planet has been invaded and occupied by an ever changing cast of character

      Not Hawaii. It was not populated before the polynesians showed up.

      But hey, giving the US a free pass in Hawaii to be hypocrites because of crap that happened on the other side of the planet is totally rational and not at all biased.

    56. Re:More religious whackjobs by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      You are a whack job. The natives' entire argument is that "might makes right", but only on their scale. They had no problem killing other natives at one point in history to gain more land. Boo-hoo.

    57. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's exactly what it said.
      Some rando AC is able to see logic while people operating a state park are idiots.

    58. Re:More religious whackjobs by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      citation? LOL good luck

    59. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You white saviour, you.

    60. Re:More religious whackjobs by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      Have you seen our national seal? An eagle with arrows and olive branches. We dictate the terms of peace because we have the weapons to do so.

      Great Seal of the US - first used in 1782.

      US becomes a world power - 1943, perhaps. An argument could be made for 1942 if you tried real hard. Before that? Requires a rather huge stretch....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    61. Re:More religious whackjobs by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      And if the Sandwich Islands had remained in the British Empire...

      For them to have remained in the British Empire, they would have had to have been part of it at some time in their history, which they weren't. Up to the time when they became a US territory they were an independent nation, and for most of that time, a monarchy. And, as it happens, the famous song Aloha 'Oe was written by Queen Liliuokalani, the last Queen of Hawaii.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    62. Re: More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the 80s there were no "military satellite tracking telescopes" on mauna kea. And if there had been military scopes, they would have been operated by military personnel with security clearances who would not have been fired anyway.

      Keep on living up to that username.

    63. Re:More religious whackjobs by Rei · · Score: 1

      It's the same reason why many of the oppose geothermal power, keeping Hawaii reliant on burning oil for most of its electricity. Also why there's opposition to even trying to redirect lava flows as most countries do when their people are threatened (with a number of successful redirects having been achieved).

      Apparently Pele wants people to be ignorant of the cosmos, to destroy the climate, and to lose their dearest possessions without putting up a fight.

      --
      Sigur RÃs: I didn't know that Heaven had a rock band.
    64. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not Hawaii. It was not populated before the polynesians showed up.

      "The Polynesians" "showed up" in multiple waves, and fought wars over land between them. You only think of them as one entity because you're a racist who thinks that intra-Polynesian conflicts are somehow different from other conflicts.

      But hey, giving the US a free pass in Hawaii

      "Free pass" for what? Hawaiians voted overwhelmingly for statehood, including a strong majority among "native" Hawaiians.

    65. Re:More religious whackjobs by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 4, Informative

      Those are all good points, but the sovereignty activists don't care. Each of them envisions themselves the new king or queen; this is about petty attempts at grabbing power, nothing more. They really don't care if they are wrong about the telescope as long as it gives them something to rally around (Hawai'i resident here; I have actually heard this said by an anti-TMT activist).

      They don't want the economic or educational benefits the telescope would bring; poor and uneducated are good for the leaders. They want racial discontent more than then want tolerance; perceptions of persecution are good for the leaders. You can point out to these activist leaders out that Hawaiian sovereignty is an inherently racist idea (it's no better than the scumbag white nationalist groups, not in my book; all race based nationalism is immoral bronze age bullshit). You can point out that everyone born in Hawai'i is an American citizen equal under the law. You can point out the economic problems that would occur the instant Hawai'i left the US, if that were to happen, and that life for their supporters would become much harder. They do not care, and they don't care if Hawai'i goes to shit, as long as they are the rulers of shit mountain.

      That's what this is really about. They want people poor, uneducated, angry, and easy to manipulate for their own benefit. None of the benefits the TMT would provide to Hawai'i County's public education system (like the high school robotics program they fund) and economy? That's great to them. They sure as hell don't want other people educating kids. And they do want people to say stupid shit like 'Hawaiians are anti-science' because it creates an us vs them environment (DO NOT SAY 'Hawaiians are anti-science' as some people have; that's racist and not true. Hawaiian does not equal anti-TMT activist). So we are not talking about a benevolent group here. Keep in mind, every year people do off road racing and snow boarding and other things on Maunakea, and leave all sorts of garbage, and no one cares about that. The Mauna is only sacred in so far as a political point can be made, in other words, they don't really give two shits about mountain or the telescope or the supposed sacredness, only what they can gain from it. Or course, if they really cared, they wouldn't be doing shit like introducing invasive ants.

      Additionally, I'd like to point out that if they were really all about ancient Hawaiian traditions, they would realize that there was nothing prohibiting building things on Maunakea and that ancient Hawaiians were active stargazers. There is nothing at all suggesting that this would be offensive. The protestors also seem to be ignoring the fact that their presence on the Mauna would, in contrast, be offense; only the ali'i and kahuna were allowed on the Mauna, not commoners like them (of course, in the modern State of Hawai'i, we are all equals and Maunakea is open to all; there are no castes of people). It's no different than the Christian groups that make up their religion as they go along and pick and choose what parts of the Bible they like in order to justify their current inane actions. It's just like a lot of stuff that seems anti-science on the outside; it's all about someone's power or wealth, you just have to find out who, and in this case it is the Hawaiian sovereignty movement.

      Hope that clear up some of the situation here. And the thing is, all of their legal, cultural, economic, scientific, and environmental arguments are complete fabricated bullshit. So whenever the telescope is built (because there is literally no good reason to block it) they are just going to use it as more 'proof' that they are being repressed, and that no one listens to or cares about Hawaiian voices (not

    66. Re:More religious whackjobs by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      More religious whackjobs blocking progress.

      I'm waiting to see if it's really religion-based or just another negotiating (shakedown) tactic. A few million here to promote native cultural issues, a few million there into the ÅOElelo HawaiÊi fund, another few million to the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, and suddenly the spirits agree with the telescope being built, and all is good. Such magic.

    67. Re:More religious whackjobs by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      That could be part of it. Anyone following the project knows that these protests have been going on for a while at low levels, but didn't really kick up until last month at about exactly the same time as when Canada chipped in $240 million.

      There is another part though; the Hawaiian sovereignty issue. Of course, that's a bullshit line of reasoning in a lot of ways (as I discuss here). Is this a shakedown for money by activist leaders or way of inciting anger for their own political gains? Probably both, though the latter seems to be more of a clear goal. Then again, if its the former, that's not something one would openly admit.

    68. Re:More religious whackjobs by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      There were enough killed in inter-tribe attacks. Their history chants about them constantly. But hey, just go ahead and preach about how killing others is perfectly normal as long as you have the "right" pigmentation and ancestors.

    69. Re:More religious whackjobs by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Actually, they own the land.
      Hawaii got annexed by the USA somewhere around 1900.
      Actually as an american you should at least know the basics.
      In other words they are a sovereign - not so sovereign anymore nation - that got conquered and anexed by the US aggressors. With all kinds of slavery, suppresion amd racial violence, similar versus the blacks or native americans.
      If they would go to an i ternational court they would win any case supporting their secession.

      In our times if a country tries to annex another one there is international uproar ... see Ukraine.

      The royal family of the Hawaiians may not even call themself so, it is illegal under the american constitution.

      Now another poster wrote: they have the democary and institutions to change what they want. That is wrong, they can't secceede, at least not without war. And the majority of inhabitants on the islands are 'americans' not Hawaiians, so they hardly win any office or anything that matters to then.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    70. Re:More religious whackjobs by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      You don't know much about Polynesia it seems?

      Not much about the USA either ... I doubt that Hawaii is in the upper third of standard of living in the USA ... compare it withh Tahiti perhaps to get a clue about other Polynesians areas? Or New Zealand?

      You do know that volcanic ash is one of the most fertile lands, or don't you? And I would rather plant wine instead of taro.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    71. Re:More religious whackjobs by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      The "Empire 101" overview of Hawaii-British relations is here:
      http://www.britishempire.co.uk...
      After al, just look at the state flag.

      For a much more detailed and personal view, I recommend "Captive Paradise" by James Haley.

    72. Re:More religious whackjobs by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've been there too. What most people don't appreciate about Mauna Kea is its staggeringly large size. As a shield volcano made of lava that came out with the consistency of oatmeal, its spread exceeds its height far more than any other mountain. And since that height had to reach 19,000' just to break the ocean surface, at its present height above water this single peak is larger than the whole Rocky Mountain range.

      What this means is that of all the world's high mountains, Mauna Kea is the easiest to access. On this gentle slope, a simple graded road is all it takes to get the largest assemblies up there. The smooth dome in an island location not in any storm belt makes for better weather, and more cloud-free nights, than anywhere else in the world. And it's roomy: the University of Hawaii administers an 11,000-acre nature preserve at the summit, with 52 acres in the middle dedicated to astronomy. Seen from above, everything we can put up there just disappears into the landscape.

    73. Re:More religious whackjobs by cavreader · · Score: 1

      On the whole skin pigmentation has played a relatively minor role in the overall history of human warfare. War is the original equal opportunity endeavor. Human history is filled with examples of people who when lacking an external enemy turn on one another. Since humans started fighting over access to nicer caves there has not been 5 minutes where there has not been some type of warfare going on somewhere on the globe. Fighting and killing one another is the most predictable and constant human traits.

    74. Re:More religious whackjobs by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      More religious whackjobs blocking progress. If they own the land, or represent the majority in a democracy, so be it; otherwise a does of "separation of church and state" would be welcome here. No one should get a free pass on being a religious whackjob simply because they aren't a Christian whackjob.

      Ah, but the only church that anybody wants to separate the state from is the Christian one.

    75. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who voted for statehood were mostly white.

      Not that it matters, because such decisions are rightfully made by all current residents of a region, but Native Hawaiians also voted 2:1 for statehood.

    76. Re:More religious whackjobs by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      only the ali'i and kahuna were allowed on the Mauna, not commoners like them

      When Isabella Bird wanted to go to the summit of Mauna Loa in the 1870s, the only major issue was that there were no warm clothes on the island of Hawaii because nobody went to the summit. They rounded up some warm clothes for her (scoured the islands for them) and she did a solo camping trip.

    77. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing like some I want my progress or I'll cry whackjob whining about others being whackjobs.

      Go sit in the corner - maybe if you spend enough time there you'll figure out how to make friends and be invited to build your telescope.

    78. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once the beauty of a place is ruined, it's not really fixable.

      Hawaii has a booming tourist trade and is one of the last places where filming these large outdoor movie scense makes sense from a locale / weather / lighting point of view. Putting a big telescope right in the middle of that ruins a lot, including their religious beliefs about keeping the land unspoiled for their future generations.

      Just because you come from a background where they'll cut down their last tree, planting saplings that won't replace what they did for 20 years, and somehow all the animals and insects are supposed to "just wait it out for a home" doesn't mean that others are more long-sighted, and may have incorporated those ideas into their religion.

    79. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a person with 3% Neanderthal DNA, i demand reparations from those with less than 1% Neanderthal DNA! and I demand access to Neanderthal sites as my cultural heritage!! occupy the caves!! down with the !%

    80. Re:More religious whackjobs by lgw · · Score: 1

      So what part of "land owners or majority in a democracy" was unclear to you? People are free to believe in whatever invisible sky grandfather makes them happy, and do with their own land according to those beliefs. But trying to block construction on someone else's land, or on public land if you're not the majority, is the opposite of religious freedom - it's using the state as an instrument of religion.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    81. Re:More religious whackjobs by lgw · · Score: 1

      When a nation turns its back against God, the church, and its citizens (abortion), it is all down hill from there.

      I'm sure you're right. Which god again? I know I don't believe in 9999 of them, but I sometimes forget what the one is that I don't disbelieve. If these religious whackjobs are elected leaders, and represent the will of the majority, then that's that - doesn't matter why they believe. But if they're some vocal minority trying to use the state as a weapon of their religion, that's clearly not religious freedom, is it?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    82. Re:More religious whackjobs by lgw · · Score: 1

      Whoever has the bigger military owns the land (or gets to say who owns the land if they don't want it). That's the entirety of "international law". Land ownership is similar.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    83. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Having worked at several large US telescopes let me add something: Academic telescopes would probably get more support if they didn't treat people like garbage. I've seen time-and-again scientists and managers involved with these large systems roll-over people in the name of advancing science. And unfortunately they usually get a lot of support because they claim to have science on their side.

      It's disgusting how little regard some of these academics have for non-scientists-- including their own staff.

      As a scientist and engineer, I'm sad that the TMT has lost support. But I completely understand why HI wouldn't want it there if it has similar issues to the scopes I've worked at.

    84. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Majority in a democracy" has decided to respect freedom of religion and basic human rights. You do not need a majority for those rights. Otherwise not being a christian in a majority-christian nation would be a problem. As would being atheist for that matter. Also, property owning isn't above this. Say you buy land and you then discover an ancient temple buried underneath. You think you should have the right to do as you please? Nope. You will be compensated for your property, under law, but the temple is public property.

      Now, in this specific case, I have no idea what exactly they consider sacred, but if they are just exploiting their religion for money, then I would hardly call them "religious whack-jobs." It has nothing to do with religion, and everything to do with greed in that case.

    85. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Religious freedom is part of the law in most western nations. Every nation that respects human rights that is:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights

    86. Re:More religious whackjobs by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      Why should I believe what you say their motives are over what they say their motives are?

    87. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US may not have been the pre-eminent power it is now, but we were able to hold our own fairly early on. Certainly we had enough force to convince the Barbary Pirates to deal with us, and the British were embarrassed a bit by the Navy around the same time.

      Of course, we had enough weaponry to make the natives deal with us from Day 1, and that's what we're talking about here, right?

    88. Re:More religious whackjobs by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      You're not required to believe anything. He's presented an alternative viewpoint, which clearly has a specific perspective, but this is just a comments page and he has merely alerted you to that perspective. Even if he provided footnotes, which would be overkill, you'd still have a responsibility to fact check if you wanted to derive an informed opinion on the situation.

      However, unless you're actually involved in the dispute, or plan to involve yourself, then you can just decide to believe him or not, and not have to worry about it all that much.

    89. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please explain how you "plant wine"? Do you just plant a cork of your favorite vintage and water it everyday?

      I find no vineyards between the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn. Perhaps you should attempt growing something for a distilled beverage instead. Maybe your taro plants could be used to distill vodka?

      .

    90. Re: More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt the Philippines welcomed the good old US of A at all. They still remember the atrocities the Americans performed in the turn of the 20th century. Hundreds of thousands of Philippinos lost their lives. Americans buried them alive, raped and hacked them to death. It was brutal on the same scale as what the Nazis or the Japanese did 35-40 years later.

    91. Re:More religious whackjobs by lgw · · Score: 1

      Are you being deliberately obtuse? No one has the right to compel these gentlemen to do anything, or take their land, just as they have no right to set the use of anyone else's land. If, however, this is public land (as seems likely), then the government gets to decide what to do with it.

      I don't know what their beef is anyhow - build the damned thing on top of the volcano, and if the freaking volcano god doesn't like it, well, I'm sure He'll think of something.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    92. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they would go to an i ternational court they would win any case supporting their secession.

      Right, just like Ireland.

      Not that it would matter, seeing as how an "international court" is purely symbolic without an international government and police force.

    93. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just stating the law. If it is public land, and these people have some claim over it being sacred, for whatever reason, then the government is obliged to take this into account. Obliged by the Declaration of Human Rights for starters.

      I get it, you don't believe in skymen. Congrats. Whatever floats your boat. We love you, you're a pepper etc.. But meanwhile, the vast majority of people do. Do not disrespect their beliefs so they wont disrespect your (non)beliefs.

    94. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Hippy, That's what happens when civilization meets stone aged cultures. They get taken over. It happens eventually to every aboriginal culture.

      No. Some aboriginal cultures are wiped out by other aboriginal cultures. And it becomes more likely to happen as they get all hippy pacifist.

    95. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're planting wine, perhaps you need to learn more about agriculture.

    96. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >There were enough killed in inter-tribe attacks.

      And...?

      Your implication seems to be the equivalent of saying that the trail of tears and death was perfectly legitimate because cherokee and choctaw occasionally fought with each other.

    97. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You understand that the Barbary Wars happened at the height of the Napoleonic Wars right? The climax of the Second Hundred Years War between Britain and France? No, I suppose that's something largely omitted from US History texts. I'll see your Barbary Pirates and raise you the Battle of the Chesapeake, Shannon vs Chesapeake, and all of Nelson and St Vincent's major battles. Or on the land side you can take it up with Napoleon and Wellington. To think that the US was in any way a major power is pure gross ignorance. Whether or not it remains true, Mahan's view of sea power was perfectly accurate for its time. You can pretty much use the number of "ships of the line" (or later, dreadnoughts) as a proxy for estimating a nation's strength. For the US, that number was a big fat zero until 1814. You could say something about the Java, and what was that other capture? But pretty much the entire Age of Sail was dominated by the Brits, and America was only able to take potshots when the giant's back was turned. The Washington Naval Treaty is a wonderfully concise summary of the balance of power at the time, and it was intended to preserve that balance. The US was a major power since WWI, but as the GP says, it did not become the major power until probably 1943. We weren't really able to "hold our own" until the Great White Fleet, and even that was more of a propaganda exercise than a serious threat to any of the world powers.

      However, as you point out, the Native Hawaiians were almost unarmed by comparison.

    98. Re:More religious whackjobs by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      Being of Cherokee, they fought much more frequently than you imply. Also, no one had a fit if women traded constantly because of this fighting. Times have changed. Funny how the Cherokee now uses American federal police to designate if you're too mixed blood and not a true native.

    99. Re: More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I doubt the Philippines welcomed the good old US of A at all.

      Despite the history, filipinos as a whole have remarkably positive views of the US and Americans. We have an amazing amount of political capital with them.

    100. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is a rant that we can choose to believe or not.

      Thank you Captain Obvious.

    101. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Being of Cherokee, they fought much more frequently than you imply

      Wooooooooooooosh!

      I mean big, fucking, you must be autistic woooooooooooooooooooosh!

    102. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "Free pass" for what? Hawaiians voted overwhelmingly for statehood, including a strong majority among "native" Hawaiians.

      They did not.
      The choices on the ballot were remain a territory or become a state.
      There was no option to take back their islands.
      A majority did not even vote at all.

    103. Re:More religious whackjobs by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "The reason why these whackjobs's opinions matter is the US is an invading and occupying colonial power who has given the vote to illegal settlers and who has appropriated this Hawaiian land, manifest destiny and all. I get that all of the native American treaties are void and most of the US should be legally reverted to native control and the illegal settlers expelled; but natives don't have nukes or numbers only casinos at the whim of the occupying power."

      Oh please. No human beings are the genuine natives of a single square inch of the planet and all of it has passed in possession from hand to hand. There isn't a single person within Hawaii who was there when it wasn't part of the US and they are all born US citizens. Along with all the other native americans. The treaties were nothing more than kindness to people with leaders too stupid to surrender before getting everyone they were responsible for protecting slaughtered.

      A treaty is no different than any other contract, you break it when the benefits outweigh the consequences. It's no different than breaking a cell phone contract when the new offer outweighs the cancellation fee. I have native blood (Blackfoot, not Hawaiian) and I have friends who are full blooded and some of them refuse to take the money from those casinos. They don't feel they are entitled to any special treatment just because of the accident of birth.

    104. Re:More religious whackjobs by shaitand · · Score: 2

      "Natives as a group have the lowest standard of living in the state."

      Like he said... "They are better off than anyone else in Polynesia, and have one of the highest standards of living in the world."

      Just because it's a low standard by Hawaiian standards doesn't mean its a low standard with any reasonable perspective.

    105. Re:More religious whackjobs by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "citation?"

      Citation? You aren't likely to find that as government PR spin but actions speak louder than words. So review native american treaties, the acquisition of Texas, the rest of the southwest, and California.

      New mexico for instance was invaded, ownership by claim of might equals right was recognized by the US, the US purchased it for a song then didn't actually pay the bill to Mexico because the US was strong enough to get away with it.

    106. Re:More religious whackjobs by shaitand · · Score: 1

      1782 shortly after defeating the british, unquestionably the most powerful nation at the time.

      It was a much bigger world then but the US was certainly the most powerful force in the new world.

    107. Re:More religious whackjobs by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Not surprisingly there are two 'givers and takers' state tables that produce almost opposite results.

      The major differences is that one considers all military spending as giving uniform benefits to all citizens while the other does the same with the highway system.

      Both lists are compiled by lying sacks of shit.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    108. Re: More religious whackjobs by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      I run the park, therefor I am an expert. I am the CEO therefor I know the business best. I am the emperor, therefor I am not naked. Appeals to authority only work when the audience has just fallen off the turnip truck within the last minute.

    109. Re: More religious whackjobs by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      Haleakala, not Mauna kea. And those operators with security clearances don't always have to be uniformed military.

    110. Re:More religious whackjobs by Sollitaire · · Score: 2

      Not all of us military related personnel are 20 somethings spending minuscule paychecks on largely undesirable things. I'm a military spouse who actually works for IBM and is working on my PhD in information science. While I realize I'm not necessarily the norm, I do live here on base so I have a bit more understanding than most who have never been here or in this situation would. The towns here that are in direct proximity to the bases are actually a lot better than many of the other towns around the U.S mostly because you can't put a base in the middle of no where on an island since the island as a whole is in the middle of no where and it isn't that big to begin with.

      That said, they did an economic study here on what would happen if they did a drawdown of troops:
      "Under the Army’s 2020 Force Structure Realignment, potentially 20,000 soldiers and 30,000 family members could be forced to leave.
      On top of the nearly 20,000 soldiers, another 3,053 direct contract jobs and 3,936 indirect jobs are at stake. Together, they make up roughly 4 percent of Hawaii’s labor force. With a move like this, officials say Hawaii’s economy could lose out on $1.3 billion."
      http://khon2.com/2014/11/14/ar...

      That is a much bigger impact than you would think being that the only real money makers here on the islands are tourism and food exports including Dole and Monsanto. There is no real economy beyond that.

      I also know some of the people who are actually a part of the team working on the telescopes here. They in no way want to do any harm to the natives or native lands. That said, the natives go back and forth a lot in what they want or choose to promote from one issue to another. The telescope project simply provides a face to the "foreign" institution that they can fight against at the moment. Being an anthropologist, I did of course research as much as I could when I got here about the natives. There is no denying that the acts perpetrated against the then standing monarchy of the Hawaiian islands where underhanded, however, that particular ruling class was not the long standing establishment many would have you believe. The islands were a part of many hostile take overs between warring tribes long before Captain Cook ever landed there.

      The real issue at hand is how poorly the island natives are doing in comparison to the prosperity that surrounds them in the form of 5 star resorts and million dollar estates of the rich and famous (http://www.ksbe.edu/_assets/spi/pdfs/reports/demography_well-being/05_06_5.pdf); the infrastructure on the outskirts of the island where there is no tourism to support it is crumbling into the ocean (http://khon2.com/2015/04/28/portion-of-crumbling-kamehameha-highway-in-kaaawa-to-be-repaired/); and the fact that there is really no such thing as affordable homes (http://www.hawaiibusiness.com/the-high-cost-of-affordable-housing/). The telescope project is simply a way to get their voice heard when everyone turns a deaf ear and blind eye to all of the other maladies occurring at a much more local level.

    111. Re:More religious whackjobs by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      Which makes just about anyone reading the comment wonder what the hell some crap about the national seal has to do about anything.

    112. Re:More religious whackjobs by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      That sure added to the conversation.

    113. Re:More religious whackjobs by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      That said, they did an economic study here on what would happen

      So, the Army did a study saying that if the Army had to leave Hawaii it would be just awful for Hawaii.

      I get it (^wink-)

      I'm about to embark on a study which will show that if Scarlett Johansson doesn't sleep with me, it'll be a horrible outcome for Scarlett Johansson, possibly costing her $1.3 billion.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    114. Re:More religious whackjobs by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to make light of your insightful and informative comment about the telescope project and the effects of inequality on Hawaiians.

      However, I bet Monsanto can give you lots of studies about why GMOs would be a miraculous boon for Hawaii and Dole can cite studies showing that a lower minimum wage in Hawaii would be terrific for poor Hawaiians.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    115. Re:More religious whackjobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Filipinos DID NOT demanded the US Navy leave. The US had a Navy port, $100mil rent, one of the biggest deep water bays, and an AF base, $100mil rent, the largest comm facility in the world. The rent was due and renegotiation proceeded. The PI wanted $200mil for each base, the US was ready to agree, then BOOM, Krakatoa (which is actually west of Java, and the movie had to be renamed to 'Volcano') The PI said we really meant $400mil for total, doesn't matter how many bases. The US said wait English is our first language so don't try that. The US deciding that Korea, Japan, and Hawaii were close enough, the PI was not worth the $$$$$ . The PI regretted this after all the $$$$$$ the US Mil $pent, the 12,000 GIs and their 15,000 Dependents $pent, and the 10,000 Filipino worker's $alaries disappeared. Oh yea, that's per base. OK, ya caught me, it was Pinatubo that blew.

    116. Re:More religious whackjobs by tibit · · Score: 1

      acts perpetrated against the then standing monarchy of the Hawaiian islands where underhanded

      Calling a move from a monarchy to democracy underhanded? Uhm, oookay, if you say so.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    117. Re:More religious whackjobs by tibit · · Score: 1

      So, that was merely an acknowledgment that Hawaii was taken over. I don't think that anyone tries to deny that, right? What happened, though, is that they now have a representative democracy instead of a monarchy that was, by all accounts, headed nowhere.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    118. Re:More religious whackjobs by Methadras · · Score: 1

      While I decry the pullback of the support for this new telescope, at the same time, I don't disagree with the reasons for why it isn't being supported. However, the OHA isn't the final say so on the matter. People have a right to object based on religious grounds and they should and for you to ask for a dose of separation of church/state only shows that you might not understand what that means. Calling them whackjobs doesn't help your argument either.

    119. Re:More religious whackjobs by irrational_design · · Score: 1

      "They are better off than anyone else in Polynesia, and have one of the highest standards of living in the world." Then I feel sorry for most people in the world. I just got back from spending a week in Oa'hu and the abject and widespread poverty of the people there was shocking to me. I have never seen that level of poverty anywhere I've lived on the mainland (Florida, Cali, Colorado, Texas, Oregon, Utah, Indiana, and Montana).

    120. Re:More religious whackjobs by irrational_design · · Score: 1

      I recently learned how the US came to control Hawaii. The story is disgusting and is easily on par with what we did to the black slaves and the native americans.

    121. Re: More religious whackjobs by irrational_design · · Score: 1

      I assume you are being sarcastic. The manner is which we occupied and annexed it was shameful and disgusting. It's as bad as what we did to the black slaves and native americans. I am ashamed to be an American.

    122. Re:More religious whackjobs by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      That's because the government isn't attached to any other churches, in general. There actually were charter schools around here using government funds to teach Islam around here, and that was cut off when it became known. My taxes aren't going to Islam or Buddhism or Shinto. They shouldn't be going to Christianity either.

      However, we keep seeing people wanting to spend my tax money on Christian stuff. We keep seeing people wanting to have official government bodies have Christian prayers. A fair number of Christians want to junk that part of the First Amendment and have governments in the US identify as Christian.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    123. Re:More religious whackjobs by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The royal family of the Hawaiians may not even call themself so, it is illegal under the american constitution.

      Care to cite the relevant part?

    124. Re:More religious whackjobs by linnsey · · Score: 1

      Most Hawaiians are in California and are doing just fine. Seriously. There are more Hawaiians in CA than in HI. There is a tremendous amount of discrimination in favor of Hawaiians, and OHA and Kamehmeha are incredibly wealthy groups. These are crocodile tears. They're also not native - they were not the first people to reach Hawaii, those were the so-called menehunes who were enslaved and killed. "Native" Hawaiians were also not living in Hawaii long enough to be considered native.

    125. Re:More religious whackjobs by linnsey · · Score: 1

      Hawaii voted 85% in favor of joining the USA. We are not victims, and full citizens of the US.

    126. Re:More religious whackjobs by linnsey · · Score: 1

      Military spending, but that's not really aid. Large projects like H3 were funded to support the military and any benefit to HI residents was a side effect.

    127. Re: More religious whackjobs by linnsey · · Score: 1

      Really? And what exactly did the US do? We marched troops down town to prevent a riot. The previous time the US had done so was to break up the riot and stop the bloodshed when Queen Lilioukalani's brother won the election against a beloved Queen with massive voter fraud - bribery, violence and intimidation.

      Queen Lilioukalani was deposed because she lost all support. She wanted to restore the monarchy - but unfortunately Hawaii had a parliament and they were not behind the idea. Only full-blooded Hawaiians would be able to vote, and then only for a small part of the government. Her council tried to convince her to abandon the proposal and the last straw came when she threatened to kill them if they did not support her.

      The day after the coup there were only three people missing from the government - the Queen and two of her councilers. The rest of the government continued to govern.

      Queen Lilioukalani was a bad Queen. She legalized opium and in a very public fashion took a large personal bribe to do so. She wrecked the economy with several bad choices, and she was plagued by corruption scandals, many involving a German fortune teller. She also had little right to the throne. Hawaii had been ruled by the Kamehameha family from inception until the last of the line died and there was an election between his Queen and King Kalakaua. When King Kalakaua died there should have been another election. It was telling that when people were talking about restoring the monarchy, they were not talking about restoring Lilioukalani to the throne.

      TL;DR - the "overthrow" was one part of the government against the other, and was pretty much just.

    128. Re: More religious whackjobs by linnsey · · Score: 1

      Hawaii was its own country for several decades before voting to join the US.

      There was no occupation.

      There was no forceful annexation.

      As for Christianity, it was Queen Ka'ahumanu who risked her life to end the Hawaiian religion. She committed a crime which would have meant her death, but her son and King instead instructed the priests to smash the idols. Did she do this because she was so weak willed and easily manipulated by the oh-so-powerful catholic priests? This is a woman who tied men who displeased her to her chariot and whipped them until they pulled her to her destination. Prior to her change of heart she enjoyed terrorizing the missionaries. This was not a stupid or weak-willed woman. She risked her life because she believed it was in the best interest of her people. She stood against tyranny and won. Who are we to second guess her?

      What she fought against was polygamy, rigid gender segregation, capital punishment for minor crimes such as having a royal person's shadow falling on them, and some women being so "important" they were never allowed to leave their huts. Discarding her experience in favor of some knee-jerk BS is disrespectful.

    129. Re:More religious whackjobs by Xolotl · · Score: 1

      It's to be built on what is essentially an arid volcanic desert on top of a mountain 4km up, above the cloud layer, alongside other telescopes which have been there for decades. No one films there, no one goes there (except for astronomers, and they have to acclimatise to the altitude). It's a moonscape.

    130. Re:More religious whackjobs by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      > he has merely alerted you to that perspective

      No, he didn't "merely alert" to an "alternative viewpoint", he disparaged their character while implicitly asserting he had mind-reading powers.

      How does one "fact check" his ESP?

    131. Re:More religious whackjobs by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...

      And various incidents after WWII when the "royals of Hawaii" invited guests to celebrations and got visited by the police explaining to them "you are not royal!"

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    132. Re:More religious whackjobs by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Have you actually read it yourself beyond the title? It doesn't permit the US government from granting anyone titles of nobility. It doesn't prevent anyone from holding or claiming such a title on other grounds.

      I suspect that you're confusing it with the Titles of Nobility amendment, which went further by stripping citizenship from anyone who would accept a title from a foreign country (so even under it self-claimed titles wouldn't count) - but that amendment was never ratified and is not standing law. Some people claim that it "has actually been ratified", and hence is part of the Constitution "that the government doesn't want you to know about" - usually this is claimed by fringe right-wingers, the type of guys to the right of the Tea Party.

    133. Re:More religious whackjobs by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The point is that the Hawaiian "queen and king" are now US subjects. Hence the USA would need to accept their title. Which they don't.

      I have sawn a movie years ago playing in Hawaii shortly before WWII, where the gatherings of Hawaiians where disrupted by the police solely on the ground of: "you have no king, you are not allowed to celebrate the birthday of your not king in public".

      However I'm not very deep into the constitution and laws of the US :D they seem so archaic.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    134. Re:More religious whackjobs by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Citizens, not subjects - US is not a monarchy.

      The US would have to accept their title for it to have any meaningful power, yes. Which of course they will never do, because the US Constitution requires all member states to have a "republican form of government", which is rather incompatible with a king. But that doesn't legally stop anyone from claiming to have the title, and having it recognized by other people.

      Police, and authorities in general, did (and do) a lot of unconstitutional and even outright illegal shit. And remember that the period you're referring to is also the one where Jim Crow was very much a reality, and it would only be a few years before thousands of Japanese would be put in concentration camps solely on account of their ethnicity.

      US Constitution is archaic because it's so hard to change (you need a 3/4 supermajority to amend - and that's 3/4 of the states, not 3/4 of the people, reflecting the original confederation-like arrangement). However, they did a pretty good job to begin with, and things that absolutely had to be changed were later changed (like dealing with slavery and women's suffrage).

    135. Re:More religious whackjobs by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      From wikipedia:

      Out of a total population of 600,000 in the islands and 155,000 registered voters, 140,000 votes were cast, the highest turnout ever in Hawaii. The vote showed approval rates of at least 93% by voters on all major islands (see adjacent figure for details). Of the approximately 140,000 votes cast, fewer than 8000 rejected the Admission Act of 1959.

      Do you know the racial/ethnic breakdown of the 140,000 voters? I'm curious if it was predominantly non-native Hawaiians.

  2. Works both ways by dissy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If that is acceptable, what about my claim that science is my religion, and the native Hawaiins are desecrating what I declare as holy land? Will they be forced to stop doing so too?

    Probably not, which is why we shouldn't allow them to stop us for this reason just the same.

    1. Re:Works both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is that they were here first.

      It's stupid, but it gives them ground for being whackjobs.

    2. Re:Works both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that is acceptable, what about my claim that science is my religion, and the native Hawaiins are desecrating what I declare as holy land?

      Did they steal the land from you?
      No?
      Then who are you to talk?

    3. Re:Works both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they are trying to steal the land from me.

      If these current day Hawaiins has a problem with the choices made by their forefathers, let them go take it up with their forefathers. It's not my problem beyond the Hawaiins stealing land belonging to the US.

    4. Re:Works both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So might makes right is fine as long as it is in the past.

      But a political process operating in the present is unacceptable.

      What a hypocritical pussy you are.

    5. Re:Works both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The land you're living on was stolen from my ancestors. Are you willing to give it up, or do you just demand that others do that? Hypocrite.

    6. Re:Works both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now now, no fair using arbitrary assertions to win an argument against other arbitrary assertions! LOL Certainly you don't expect me to respect your arbitrariness as I assert you should respect mine? ;-)

    7. Re:Works both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So might makes right is fine as long as it is in the past.

      Whether we like it or not, it always has and probably always will.

      The entirety of human history is littered with instances of one civilization conquering another. Maybe it's just my white privilege talking, but I'd imagine that as foreign invaders go, being conquered by the US is a damn sight better than being taken over by the Russians or the Chinese. I'm sure they're all just suffering so much under the thumb of the US government and it's tyrannical dictates. It must be a white-christian conspiracy to install this piece of scientific infrastructure on their holy site, and in the process smother all that's sacred in their precious little native culture.

      I know, let's have the US leave, I'm sure they'll be perfectly happy as a Chinese colony. I mean, white people are the driving force behind all oppression, PoC would never fuck each other over.

      Maybe, just maybe, they should be thinking "Well, it sucks that the US took over all those years ago, but we could be being raped for all we're worth by the godless Chinese. Maybe being part of an (admittedly dysfunctional) Representative Democracy isn't so bad after all." Or just keep yapping about how Whitey is fucking you over, even as the white devils let your precious little native culture continue to exist in the first place. Take a deep breath and look at how badly the Europeans handled their African colonies. You fucking islanders got off easy, and don't fucking forget it. You could have had your native culture crushed under invading bootheels and spit on for good measure. The fact that these nativist retards can even bitch about this shit without being slaughtered in retaliation is an indication that they're living the good life, so far as "subjugated" cultures are concerned.

    8. Re:Works both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I posted above, but I'll respond here similarly. Being a scientist doesn't give you the license to disrepect people without consequence. The people building and managing some of these telescopes are completely disrespectful towards the locals and even the employees, often justifying their behavior using your argument. I'd say that the locals have had enough of the abuse and BS politics.

      Source: I've worked for/at several large observatories-- domestic and international.

  3. Certainty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure the comments here will take into account nuanced perspectives of Hawaiian native history and culture, why voices of opposition might exist, the importance of community engagement in scientific endeavors... and making sure voices that create bridges between culture and science are heard:

    "Mailani Neal, an 18-year-old high school student from the Big Island, said it was her dream to study physics and return to Hawaii to become an astronomer. “As a Hawaiian in support of this project, I felt the need to make my opinions known,” she said. Her voice broke as she spoke about the scientific contributions Hawaii could make to the world, and the important role of astronomy in Hawaiian culture, which relied on stars to navigate the Pacific.

    “Stars brought our Hawaiian ancestors to Hawaii, and now we have the opportunity to bring the people of Hawaii to the stars,” she said.

    1. Re:Certainty by Crashmarik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sure the comments here will take into account nuanced perspectives of Hawaiian native history and culture,

      You mean the history culture of shaking down any deep pocket involved in a large construction project ?
       

    2. Re:Certainty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the comments here will take into account nuanced perspectives of Hawaiian native history and culture, why voices of opposition might exist, the importance of community engagement in scientific endeavors...

      The posts and even more importantly, the moderation, on this topic is super disheartening. Slashdot is approaching greybeard status and yet the dominant opinion is still nothing better than the callow teenager's ignorant send selfish rant. Age does not bring wisdom, at least not for nerds.

    3. Re:Certainty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admitted old guy here. I had to turn my hearing aid up to hear the sound of one hand wringing at the top of a Hawaiian mountain.

      I'm sorry the discourse saddens you, but I have found in this thread plenty of well-reasoned reasons to doubt the sincerity, credibility, and practicality of the native agenda.

      It's not acting like a callow teenager to weigh and then dismiss a vague religio-nationalist huff in favor of the advancement of human understanding.

    4. Re:Certainty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have found in this thread plenty of well-reasoned reasons to doubt the sincerity, credibility, and practicality of the native agenda.

      That says everything about you. All I have seen are outright fabrications, broad generalizations and the worst stereotyping without one single iota of proof that they actually apply to the people involved in this situation. As someone who was born there, lived his first 20 years on that island, had hawaiiana classes in school and worked at one of the telescopes I think I'm in a pretty good position to judge all the shallow self-serving analysis here as utterly callow bullshit.

  4. Prefer support by saskboy · · Score: 1

    I'd prefer having the support of local people. However, religious belief too often stands in the way of telescopic investigation of our universe. Perhaps there can be something done so they feel it is part of their culture after all.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re: Prefer support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They played the game of thrones. They lost. Get over it.

    2. Re: Prefer support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not likely. And that's the problem. How do you realistically reverse an illegal act of over a century ago with so many people invested in that illegal act? And how far back do you go?

    3. Re: Prefer support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where should we draw the line? Before or after the Polynesians arrived and wiped out the original Hawaiians?

    4. Re: Prefer support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about to 1959 when almost 100% voted to join the US.

    5. Re: Prefer support by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

      People keep saying this, but I can find no record of settlement previous to the Polynesians. So is there actually history behind this, or is this something you're making up to pretend like there's some kind of parity?

    6. Re: Prefer support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is making it up. There is no evidence of a native population before the polynesians arrived. There were multiple groups of polynesians, but they weren't so far apart in time as to be considered distinct populations.

      This entire comment section is full of self-indulgent bullshit from people trying to rationalize their own bullshit beliefs. It is a really profound display of people being far worse versions of exactly what they claim to despise.

    7. Re: Prefer support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How about to 1959 when almost 100% voted to join the US.

      That is false. Only 140,000 of the island's 600,000 people voted to join. Furthermore, many tens of thousands of those people were us military servicemen currently stationed there.

      Really, the near unanimity of those results ought to be a tip off that it was rigged. We don't believe similar numbers for the vote in Crimea to secede from Ukraine, why would we believe these?

    8. Re: Prefer support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can start by giving the descendants of those people a lot more say in managing public lands. Like what these protesters are lobbying for.

    9. Re: Prefer support by aevan · · Score: 2

      The logic is that polynesia isn't a monolithic entity, and different groups colonised hawaii; an initial group in around 1800 years ago, another took over a millenia later. Whether this was a cultural influence or an actual invasion is disputed, but the idea is "if we restore Hawaii to the initial people, it'd go to the Marquesas and not the Tahitian polynesians".

      Or the midgets . I favour them personally.

    10. Re: Prefer support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will you likewise insist that Cuba return the property it seized during the revolution?

    11. Re: Prefer support by Sarius64 · · Score: 2

      Because they have managing insight based upon genetics? How exactly does that trick work? If that can be passed down genetically I say the bastards start installing Calculus 3 at birth because that was hard!

    12. Re:Prefer support by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      The TMT people do want the support of the community. They have gone far out of their way to do so, to invest in local education, to invest in cultural affairs, to be respectful of cultural and environmental concerns, ect. The protesters conveniently ignore how much they have done, and misinformation and rumors can be found all over social media.

    13. Re: Prefer support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The previous people living in Hawaii were called the Menehune, and the modern Polynesians hunted them to extinction soon after arriving in these islands.

      Sometimes I joke about Menehune Rights (instead of Hawaiian Rights). :-)

    14. Re: Prefer support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Whether this was a cultural influence or an actual invasion is disputed,

      That is an example of "false balance." There is basically no evidence for an invasion. Furthermore the idea itself is implausible. It isn't like any polynesians had a navy capable of transporting the people and resources needed to conquer the islands. Nor was there economic value in such an endeavor. Refugees and explorers showing up and assimilating? Absolutely. A conquering force? Not a chance.

    15. Re: Prefer support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Because they have managing insight based upon genetics?

      No, because property rights are the fucking bedrock of this country.

    16. Re: Prefer support by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It isn't like any polynesians had a navy capable of transporting the people and resources needed to conquer the islands. Nor was there economic value in such an endeavor. Refugees and explorers showing up and assimilating? Absolutely. A conquering force? Not a chance.

      Maori didn't quite conquer New Zealand that way (there was no-one to conquer it from), but they definitely did assemble a fleet large enough to be an invasion force.

  5. Tiki idols... by BenJeremy · · Score: 2

    Peter Brady nods his head sagely....

  6. No guilt for you by Iamthecheese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nope, I'm finished feeling guilty for the acts of previous generations. The islands are part of the United States now. They have their votes and councils. They have their local government. And this isn't about religion anyway, it's about declaring as much independence as possible. Fuck that, the war is over. I don't care that they want to make a statement. I do care that they want to make their statement at the cost of science. I'm not sure whether I'm disappointed we're not using eminent domain here but I don't think these objections are valid.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:No guilt for you by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      the spoils of war, is it sad? of course, but thats the way wars work

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't a war. It was a coup staged by foreign businessmen.

      The US is still pissed about the coup in Iran by locals and the coup in Cuba by locals. Seems like the consistency is what the US wants is right.

    3. Re:No guilt for you by chipschap · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As a haole[1] living in Hawai`i, I took the time to learn the history and some of the language.

      You can't possibly study the events of 1893 and conclude that anything but a monstrous wrong was committed. (I'm writing a novel called "No keia la, no keia po" and to write it I had to read extensively about those days.)

      I don't know how to right that wrong. The Hawaiian sovereignty movement has its own ideas, though I don't know how practical those ideas may be. But I do know that something really, really bad was done back then, and it shouldn't be set aside or forgotten.

      [1] Today this generally means 'Caucasian' and is sometimes used in a derogatory manner, but in the Hawaiian language, it actually means 'foreigner' without judgmental overtones.

    4. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haole by itself is not pejorative.
      Use it as "damn haole" or "fucking haole" or "haole, that's why" and it becomes pejorative.

    5. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, "haole, that's why" seems to be the most appropriate explanation for the over-whelming consensus in the comments and moderations of this story. So sad,

    6. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hawaiians voted overwhelmingly for statehood. Native Hawaiians voted overwhelmingly for statehood too. And it paid off in terms of investment and economic development. There is no basis for giving "Hawaiians" the same status as Native American tribes have, let alone autonomy. And the very concept of assigning public land or redistributing private land based on ancestry is racist.

    7. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      > Hawaiians voted overwhelmingly for statehood.

      That would be false.

      Out of a population of 600,000 only 140,000 voted for statehood.
      And of that 140,000, tens of thousands were US military servicemen.

      Also, the choice was limited between remaining a territory with just half-assed rights but all the obligations or become a full state and get full rights with essentially the same obligations. There was no option for sovereignty.

    8. Re:No guilt for you by Ramze · · Score: 2

      1893 was 122 years ago. I sympathize with the actual natives living at the time, but they aren't alive anymore. Six "generations" later, I don't think anyone is entitled to reparations. There is an unspoken statute of limitations on this sort of thing. Not a single disgruntled Hawaiian today was born knowing anything other than living with the reality of the rule of the USA - same as any other citizen born in the USA. Why should their ancestry or DNA give them any privilege?

      Did you know that my native South Carolina was once a British colony? Seems the demographics shifted a bit over time and the rebels stole her away to form the USA.... then she broke off that yoke to form a Confederacy with many other states... and was attacked by the USA and again re-absorbed into the union.

      Should I as a native South Carolinian get reparations for not being part of the British Commonwealth? or the Confederacy? Nonsense.

      I believe the Hawaiian Homelands is sufficient restitution.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...

      Let's not forget that the Kingdom of Hawaii was forged from bloodshed, war, and usurping land itself from OTHER natives on various islands -- and it was a rather short-lived kingdom that lasted less than 100 years. Seems odd to opine for the bad old days of bloody island warfare and subjugation that spanned less time than the state of Hawaii has existed. Throughout the history of the world, countries have come and go. Hawaii was taken over by an internal rebellion - granted, mostly consisting of settled foreigners... but, still -- they lived there, so I can't fault them for fighting to become a state.

      I've visited the lovely land of Hawaii. Beautiful place... the luau I attended was fantastic. I was served poi. Disgusting stuff that makes paper mache paste sound delicious (though the other food was quite good). The native serving the poi said "yeah, this is the nasty stuff we used to eat before foreigners visited the island. POI -- I assume it was named for the sound you make when you spit it out of your mouth.. poi poi poi."

      But, I digress. I see all this Kingdom of Hawaii stuff as merely delusional fantasies of people's ancestral rights to govern themselves rather than appease the country they actually live within. I think the religious desecration angle is a more convincing argument if they truly believe the land is sacred.

    9. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I believe the Hawaiian Homelands is sufficient restitution.

      Of course you do. Since you never even heard of it until you googled it 5 minutes before posting. Clearly you have a strong grasp of local politics.

      > the luau I attended was fantastic. I was served poi. Disgusting stuff

      You went to a hotel luau and they didn't explain that people eat poi in combination with other food, not by itself. You are definitely now an expert on native hawaiian affairs.

      Seriously, arrogantly ignorant assholes like yourself are the stereotype that give all decent white people a bad rep. How delusional do you have to be to think that you know better than the people whose families have been there for centuries?

    10. Re:No guilt for you by chipschap · · Score: 1

      Poi is, um, an acquired taste.

      This whole discussion only serves to reinforce my feeling that there are no simple answers to complex issues.

      But about the telescope--- I happened to be on the University of Hawai`i campus when one of the early protest demonstrations was starting up. I had to walk down Dole Street to get to where I was going and that meant traversing long lines of (very orderly and well-behaved) protesters.

      Most of them were of course students. And listening to them a little, it seemed that quite a few of them weren't exactly informed on the issue. They were there because the Hawaiian Studies faculty told their students to go.

      Something to be said on both sides of this issue, too.

    11. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't judge a protest by the least informed members. If that were the standard then that would mean there is no racial injustice anywhere in America.

      Just because they can't fully articulate their grievances doesn't mean their experiences are invalid.

    12. Re:No guilt for you by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      Poi is, um, an acquired taste.

      Throw some Thai curry on top of it, taro and coconut go great together. Or just mix it up into some kulolo. I really can't see the whole 'tastes like paste' thing, but that's just my opinion. It's just like any other staple foodstuff, the flavor is somewhat mild so as to complement that which it is served with. That's a feature, not a bug. Now, pa'i'ai, if that was served up more, I'll bet that'd be a much more popular way of serving taro. Pa'i'ai kicks ass.

      They were there because the Hawaiian Studies faculty told their students to go.

      And could you just imagine the outrage if a science department told their students to go to a counter-protest.

    13. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're saying removing one's right to self-determination (for their own good, of course), is fine and nobody deserves any compensation for having their entire society destroyed.

      So, if someone were to steal your wealth and wait two generation, your family would have no claim to it, either.

      It's interesting that you think people shouldn't identify themselves by their heritage, yet you come from a nation of people who do so. Land of the brave, the people who fought off the British empire.

      You deny others these things, yet you insist on having it yourself.

    14. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, if someone were to steal your wealth and wait two generation, your family would have no claim to it, either.

      In case you haven't noticed, that is exactly the way things work in this world.

      And if you're white, expecting it any other way is seen as entitlement. Many of my ancestors (even the white ones) were fucked over seven ways from Tuesday and I have no claim to restitution for those acts. Who would fulfill them anyway?

    15. Re: No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I propose they have a holiday. We can call it "ooops. Sorry about that day". The good thing is that we can combine a lot of other mistakes into that..

    16. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a haole[1] living in Hawai`i, I took the time to learn the history and some of the language.

      You can't possibly study the events of 1893 and conclude that anything but a monstrous wrong was committed. (I'm writing a novel called "No keia la, no keia po" and to write it I had to read extensively about those days.)

      I don't know how to right that wrong. The Hawaiian sovereignty movement has its own ideas, though I don't know how practical those ideas may be. But I do know that something really, really bad was done back then, and it shouldn't be set aside or forgotten.

      [1] Today this generally means 'Caucasian' and is sometimes used in a derogatory manner, but in the Hawaiian language, it actually means 'foreigner' without judgmental overtones.

      1893? Yeah, I don't give a shit. Plenty of atrocities have occurred to my people as well over the past couple of millenia. Do you see me losing any sleep over it? Nope.

      If you want to be some sort of guilt junkie, that's really your problem.

    17. Re:No guilt for you by Ramze · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've known about the "reservations" on Hawaii for decades. Interesting how you're an anonymous coward that presumes to know me and what I know.

      The luau wasn't a hotel one... geez... I don't think the hotel had the space for it anyway. Never claimed to be an expert on Hawaii btw - but at least I've visited and taken an interest unlike most armchair pundits.

    18. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're quite the little tyrant. Maybe I'll get the local city council to approve some public works across the top of your house - for the good of the many. Even better I'll target your parents' properties while I'm at it. Of course the city will be *generous*: 70 cents on the dollar for your troubles.

      You should be drawn and quartered in the town square.

    19. Re:No guilt for you by Ramze · · Score: 1

      I hear spam is much more popular than the poi there, but It could be a myth as I haven't seen any polling data to back it up - just anecdotal evidence. haha.

      I have no issues with people protesting. I've had friends that got extra credit in their humanities studies for protesting, though so I find such uninformed student protests dubious.

      I don't mean to imply that there is no sense of injustice with the US occupation of the island, but I see it as historical fact, not something we can turn back the clock on. Same with the Native Americans - terrible track record with wars (including biological warfare) and breaking peace treaties, trail of tears, etc. etc. But, their small consolation is the reservations and today, many of my friends are 1/4 or 1/8th of Native American descent. "Pure" native american populations have been declining for a long time and more of them identify as Americans rather than members of their native tribes. What's done is done, and it's too late for the Natives to have a say in who builds what on what mountaintop that someone else owns.

      That's why I say the religious route is a good argument. The mountain should have been protected as part of the agreement to make the Hawaiian Homelands if it's sacred... but still, no one would stand for someone destroying Jerusalem or Mecca - even if the destroyers rightfully owned the land. I'm sure there's a way to lobby for protected status if it's that important.

      Heck, I think Hawaii is gorgeous and maybe we shouldn't built giant telescopes on pretty mountains anyway ;-) I'm sure the locals could make a zoning ordinance to scrap the construction easily.

      I just don't think the simple fact that they're of native descent should hold much weight in the decision. I mean, who cares who their parents and grandparents were - they're Americans living in Hawaii now and if they choose to live a traditional Hawaiian lifestyle, they can live on the reservations... er... "homelands."

      The Hawaiian Kingdom folks in particular are a bit nutty and want to "end the US occupation" of Hawaii.
      http://www.hawaiiankingdom.org... I have a hard time taking them seriously - especially since they're hypocritical in thinking that because the kingdom usurped other tribal lands and conquered the islands that they're the true stewards of Hawaii and not the USA which, in turn, usurped them.

    20. Re:No guilt for you by Ramze · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what Pa'i'ai is, but I shall have to put it on my list of things to try next! :-)

    21. Re:No guilt for you by Ramze · · Score: 1

      Wow, that was a lot of hogwash. lol.

      When you are born into a country, you must obey that country's laws. Welcome to the planet Earth. I didn't choose to have the legal drinking age set for me at 21 in SC... but it is... and it was when I was born. Not just myself, but EVERYONE's right to self-determination is removed when you live in a country with laws - you are restricted by those laws, right or wrong. The Hawaiians born today are Americans by birth - and if they're of Hawaiian ancestry, they have additional rights to live on the Hawaiian Homelands if they choose. They even get minority status grants and such.

      The ancient Hawaiian society is a myth - by the time the USA took over, the islands were heavily populated by foreigners and even the kingdom which was only around for a short time was built by subjugating tribes itself!

      As for your hilarious argument about stealing from families generations ago, MY FAMILY had its houses BURNED during the Civil War - because we helped slaves escape to the north. Exactly whom should I call to get the large plantation houses rebuilt that society apparently OWES me?!?! No one! But then, I didn't buy those lands or build those houses in the first place, so who is anyone to say that simply because my ancestors owned something that was taken away from them that I am somehow the grieved party?

      Also, take note that while you seem to imply that Americans are proud of our rebellion, yet deny others the same rebellion -- we also put down our own rebellious states in our Civil War. Personally, I believe the USA should have some legislative process for succession - not because I necessarily support any particular succession, but because there should at least be a process for it. Say if Hawaii were to decide to succeed and become an independent country or join the British Commonwealth. There should be a process of ratifying that succession peacefully.

      I would never imply that the USA is perfect - or even that it is right in many of the international politics it plays. I'm just a realist. We can't turn back the clock and we can't bow to pressure from "natives" just because their ancestors were there first. If two people are born in Hawaii - one of European descent and another of native descent, why should the one of native descent have any greater say in such issues? They're both Americans! You know, democracy is one person, one vote -- we don't weight the votes by ancestry.

    22. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, it's much like this whole "Israel" fantasy. The ancient kingdom of Israel had a lifespan of a couple hundred years, and took place two thousand years ago. The Turks as heirs to the Ottoman Empire have a more legitimate claim to the land than people claiming to descend from a population that left the area as refugees during the Roman rule.

    23. Re:No guilt for you by chipschap · · Score: 2

      1) Pa`i`ai kind of literally means "slapped food" or "beaten food" which refers to the pounding process to make poi. Poi is pounded taro diluted with water. Pa`i`ai is not diluted. This is interesting, and they'll ship pa`i`ai to you.

      http://www.guavarose.com/2013/...

      2) Poi is great with the right foods. Mixed with lomi lomi salmon --- `ono! (delicious).

      3) As to judging a protest by uninformed members, no, it doesn't invalidate it, but when a large percentage of the protesters are there because the profs told them to go or because they get 'extra credit' or the like, it does raise some questions. Do they oppose the telescope because they were told they should, or because they understand the issue and took a stand?

      4) Bear with me here. Understanding Hawai`i is not so easy. It is very different from the mainland. I like to describe it this way. If you consider the cultural differences between Manhattan and say, a small town in rural Mississippi, the gap is considerable but I describe the type of differences as being along the x-axis. The differences between New York and Tokyo are great, too, but those differences are of another type, and I describe them as being on the y-axis.

      People come from the mainland to Hawai`i and expect cultural differences, of course, but they think that they're all on the x-axis. But they aren't. There are definite y-axis differences, too, and a lot of people don't get that. They are the ones who have trouble getting along or understanding the issues. Perhaps I had less trouble adapting because I've been married to an Asian for over 30 years, and I've dealt with y-axis differences. But I've watched people from the mainland come and later go, saying they just couldn't get along in a place like this.

      Hawai`i is a very complex place, and there are no easy answers. The postings in this thread, I think, reinforce that opinion.

    24. Re:No guilt for you by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      Well, you shouldn't feel guilty for things you didn't do. That's obvious.

      What seems to be less obvious to you is that nor should you nonchalantly accept past crimes and with a wave of your hand dismiss the grievances of a wronged people.

      "The war is over" is the biggest historical cop-out ever heard. As long as morality is equated to victory in war, there will be no peace.

      So don't feel guilty about past generations' war crimes. Feel guilty about your own imperialist moralism.

    25. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I've known about the "reservations" on Hawaii for decades.

      Knowing they exist and knowing fuck all about them are two entirely different things.

      > Never claimed to be an expert on Hawaii

      #1 sign of a bullshitter is hiding behind the literlism defense - "I didn't literally say I was an expert". Well I didn't literally say you claimed to be an expert either.

      Telling everybody that you think HH is sufficient without even a hint of explanation as to why is exactly the kind of self-absorbed fuckwadry of someone who thinks he's an expert.

      > Interesting how you're an anonymous coward that presumes to know me and what I know.

      IRONY OVERLOAD.
      It really sucks being judged by someone who doesn't know you or your history, doesn't it?

    26. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the English tried to wipe out my people twice, the Italians and Norwegians waged war against my unarmed ancestors. That does not mean that I am entitled to anything for those historical events.

      Hawaiians aren't either. They need to suck it up or leave the comfortable civilization they were born in to.

    27. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When you are born into a country, you must obey that country's laws.

      You are so righteous in your ignorance you don't even realize you are arguing against yourself.
      These people are not breaking the law. Protest is a big part of the american process for effective legal change.

    28. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but in the Hawaiian language, it actually means 'foreigner' without judgmental overtones.

      St. Chad Piianaia, a Hawaiian educated in England, said the word haole implies thief or robber (from hao, thief, and le, lazy). [7] In 1944, Hawaiian scholar Charles Kenn wrote, "In the primary and esoteric meaning, haole indicates a race that has no relation to one's own; an outsider, one who does not conform to the mores of the group; one that is void of the life element because of inattention to natural laws which make for the goodness in man. In its secondary meaning, haole ... implies a thief, a robber, one not to be trusted. ...

    29. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I say we take it back to before the Polynesians invaded and started fucking up the flora and fauna.
      Back before the aunties started blowing up little boys foreskins to stretch them. back before males were banging their friends wives. back before casual pedofiic marriages. back before a completely misogynistic culture. Back before human sacrifices to retarded ass volcano gods.

      Its funny how anti-white Hawaiians now like to bitch and complain but are too goddamned lazy to move their asses back into the wilderness to grow taro.
      I think they've been paid in full a thousand times over, over many generations.

      Get over it, they were literally savages 200 years ago. I mean they'd be thrown in jail for pedofillia, murder, rape, not to mention their shit living conditions (Accept for their leaders). It'd be like going into a white trash trailer park now accept much much worse.

      Adding one more telescope where there are already 20+ telescopes isn't going to hurt anyone's real feelings.
      I say lets round all their asses up and let them prove their dedication to their goddess and throw themselves into pele's flame-hole as restitution for the 20+ other telescopes. if they do that I'd say it's a serious enough issue.

    30. Re:No guilt for you by tibit · · Score: 1

      Protest is a big part of the american process for effective legal change.

      Sure. It's can still be bullshit, though, and it is in this case. I see some parallels between this and the Kurdish cries for their own country. If either got what they wished for, they'd be royally screwed.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    31. Re:No guilt for you by linnsey · · Score: 1

      Really? And how did you enjoy "Kill a haole" day?

      Haole is a terrible thing to call someone. I've had bottles thrown at my head for walking in the wrong areas while white. I was 14.

      I wasn't allowed to enter Hula competitions because I'm white. I can't apply or attend one of our most prestigious schools because I'm white. I've been on the receiving end of so much harassment because I'm a haole, yet this word is not derogatory? I don't think you've lived in HI long. Did you grow up here?

    32. Re:No guilt for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious; which ethnicity do you claim? I am unaware of any group that can legitimately claim that the English "tried to wipe out" once, let alone twice.
      Fair enough they've been at war with pretty much every other nation on the planet, but acts of genocide are taking it a bit far.

      I say this as someone who does not count the potato famine or the use of concentration camps during the Boer War as acts of genocide by the way.

    33. Re:No guilt for you by Xolotl · · Score: 1

      I find it amazing (and not in a good way) that getting extra credit for protesting is even possible. It strikes me as deeply unethical, along the same lines as buying votes (which I'm quite sure the humanities professors involved would decry loudly).

  7. Fuck em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just put the fucking thing in Chile. At least Chile is glad to have these monuments to science and elightenment. Leave Hawaii to wallow in its xenophobic religious fundamentalism.

  8. "Hawaiians" -- Meh by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    All this particular interest group is doing by going against good science is making is less likely they'll get what they want.

    The world goes the way the most powerful choose it shall go. So it has ever been, and likely will continue to go for the foreseeable future. Going against the good things the powerful do is just one more very efficient way to get them to consider your desires irrelevant -- a really poor way of trying to get the powerful to use said power in your favor.

    These people are not "natives", either. They didn't evolve there. They're immigrants and descendants of immigrants. just like all of us on the US mainland, basically anywhere but (probably) Africa. Perhaps what you meant to say was "descendents of the earliest known settlers." Or perhaps "invaders" is more accurate.

    Another thought along the lines of the powerful do what the powerful want to do... do you think the earliest of these folks took the time to see if the other local life forms wanted them and their changes on and around these islands? Did the fish want to be speared, for instance?

    It's all a matter of perspective and power. These people seem to have neither.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:"Hawaiians" -- Meh by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

      All this particular interest group is doing by going against good science is making is less likely they'll get what they want.

      No. The demographic of this interest group is ridiculously powerful in Hawaii. See, e.g., Hawaiian Homelands. White people are in the minority, as are science types.

      The Catholic Church managed to go against science without a problem for more than a millennium.

    2. Re:"Hawaiians" -- Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The demographic of this interest group is ridiculously powerful in Hawaii. See, e.g., Hawaiian Homelands.

      DHHL, like similar agencies for other native americans (e.g. Bureau of Indian Affairs) is mostly about corruption fucking over the people they are chartered with serving.

    3. Re:"Hawaiians" -- Meh by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Do these natives actually own the land? Legally, I would assume not, or they'd just shut down the project for trespassing.

      So, property rights doesn't really come into play here. This is all about use of land which is NOT owned by the protesters. OHA did not change the legal basis for the telescope to continue to be built. It is still legal to build it, it is just on voluntary hiatus while the managers of the project try to work something out so everyone is happy.

    4. Re:"Hawaiians" -- Meh by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The natives would own it if their government hadn't been forcibly overthrown by US business interests acting illegally (by US law as it existed at the time).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  9. Grievance Mongering by Tailhook · · Score: 1

    Blaming this on "religion" is a cop-out. They're waving their "religion" in your face because they know you will crawl on your belly over hot glass to avoid "offending" their "native" sensibilities.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  10. Sounds like a good argument by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    They also point to management audits from the 1990s and 2000s that found the summit area was being mismanaged by the University of Hawaii and state government and say those issues should be resolved before any more telescopes are built.

    That sounds like a pretty damned good argument to me, by itself. Is the summit area currently being mismanaged? Or were those audits merely cash grabs themselves? Surely someone knows more, given the backgrounds of readers of this site. Unless they've all been scared off by now between beta, auto-playing videos, and slashverdicements.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. what is sacred? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that is acceptable, what about my claim that science is my religion, and the native Hawaiins are desecrating what I declare as holy land? Will they be forced to stop doing so too?

    What if France wanted to build an oceanic research station on the D-Day beaches where the Allies landed and died? What if Poland wanted to build a university on some of the land that is currently the preserved concentration camps? What about all the outrage when some company wants to mine in some nature preserve? Why don't we build office towers in Arlington Nation Cemetery?

    Stop being so materialistic (in the metaphysical sense).

    1. Re:what is sacred? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      What if France wanted to build an oceanic research station on the D-Day beaches where the Allies landed and died?

      That strikes me as just fine.

      Maybe it would be reasonable to ask them to add a small section as a memorial to those who fought and died to free France and perhaps those people could be honored by future research done in their name, since such a research station only exists built by the French because of it.

      So sure, go ahead... dedicate the building to the allied soldiers, it would be a nice tribute.

      What if Poland wanted to build a university on some of the land that is currently the preserved concentration camps?

      What a great way to slap the face of the Nazi's by building our future on top of their evil. You could use it as a learning opportunity for all future students. You could put a memorial to the whole thing right in the center of the common grounds of the university. Millions of students over the years would have direct contact with it and be forced to see it on a regular basis, rather than once in a lifetime on a field trip during high school.

      What about all the outrage when some company wants to mine in some nature preserve?

      That's fine, all of Earth is one big nature preserve... Perhaps 25% of all the profit from the mining could be used to double the size of the preserve and establish a fund to return the land to better condition when they are done.

      Why don't we build office towers in Arlington Nation Cemetery?

      You could, but it would be pointless, there is perfectly good land half a mile over that works as well, and no one is asking to do that.

    2. Re:what is sacred? by Xolotl · · Score: 1

      The issue is that all of those places are somewhere something else happened or is. The summit of Mauna Kea is a barren desert, with no relics and very little (if any) wildlife, for the same reason that makes it so attractive for astronomy (high altitude and very low humidity or rainfall). The natural and ancient sites (including a quarry, clearly mining was ok) are lower down and protected by reserves.

      FlyHelicopters makes a good point, too ...

    3. Re:what is sacred? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're such a fool, but you think you're being progressive and enlightened.

      That's fine, all of Earth is one big nature preserve... Perhaps 25% of all the profit from the mining could be used to double the size of the preserve and establish a fund to return the land to better condition when they are done.

      Sorry, that's not how it works. That money belongs to the company, and won't be used to double the size of anything. Earth is not a nature preserve, it is actually a manufacturing site.

      This is basically the flaw with everything you've said: you assume that the best outcome is what you claim will happen. Doesn't work that way. Businesses destroy and then whine like little bitches about having to fix up (usually sending poor people the bill). Destroying all evidence of the past in favour of building something on the site won't make people believe it, it just removes evidence. "Why would they put that big building there if it wasn't to hide the place they claimed Auschwitz was? It's so they don't have to prove it happened!"

      You have a lot of growing up to do. Things that are meaningless to you are not meaningless to other people, and you need to accept that and just move on.

    4. Re:what is sacred? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, that's not how it works. That money belongs to the company, and won't be used to double the size of anything. Earth is not a nature preserve, it is actually a manufacturing site.

      Actually, the way it works is that nature preservation costs money, and you can either make that explicit by having people who care about conservation pay for it, or you can indirectly pay for it by having government make conservation decisions; the latter works much worse.

      You have a lot of growing up to do.

      No, you have a lot of growing up to do, since you still seem to believe that the good things in life come from the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus.

    5. Re:what is sacred? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FlyHelicopters: I love you. You just demonstrated "the perfect reply" to me. Countered all points and didn't even use any harsh language. Beautiful.

  12. Is it too late to rename the Laniakea Supercluster by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    wikipedia states

    The name Laniakea means "immeasurable heaven" in Hawaiian, from lani for "heaven" and akea for "spacious" or "immeasurable". The name was suggested by Nawa'a Napoleon, an associate professor of Hawaiian language at Kapiolani Community College. The name honors Polynesian navigators who used heavenly knowledge to navigate the Pacific Ocean.[3][7]

    And perhaps more importantly, the Nature letter and preprint

  13. Welcome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The vote, which reverses a 2009 decision to endorse the project, strikes a powerful if symbolic blow against a project that, for many native Hawaiians, has come to symbolize more than a century of assaults against their land, culture and sovereignty.

    You have now been treated like any other minority, indigenous tribe in North America. Welcome to the United States of America!

  14. Build it in Chile by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    So just close down the the entire project in Hawaii like right now. I am sure that the government and the people of Chile will welcome the jobs and economic spinoffs.

    1. Re:Build it in Chile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we have a winner!

      Let's just leave Hawaii to the natives and tourists; fuck everybody else.

  15. Well, yes. Of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "assaults against their land, culture and sovereignty."

    Well, yes, but that's what happens if you're not a sovereign country. The USA own it. Invaded long enough ago now that it's theirs by right of long tenancy. If you want to be sovereign, then you need to secede, revolt or become a rogue state like the Ukraine did in the eyes of the Russian government.

    That's how you get to keep your sovereignty.

    Not by whining about it.

  16. All they need now is to discover unobtanium by mejustme · · Score: 1

    Avatar quote that comes to mind: "You throw a stick in the air around here it falls on some sacred fern, for Christ's sake!"

  17. I totally agree with these voices in support of Ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is simple, obviously.

    The 90% of the population that is not of native ancestry should be removed, immediately, and relocated to the mainland.

    The observatories should be shut down, and the many species of native vegetation and native wildlife commonly found at the summit should be restored, immediately.

    The closest blood relatives of each island's ali'i family should be found, and be provided with the necessary military gear to establish local fiefdoms, maintaining a culturally appropriate level of strife as per the pre-Kamehameha unification (he was supported in his efforts by westerners, which gave him an unfair advantage.)

    Finally, we should provide all necessary needed legal consultations to restore the Kapu System, and funds as needed to restore the local theocracy. Remember, abolishment of the kapu system was a cynical ploy by Kamehameha II, based upon consultation with Europeans (particular the British, the global meddlers), and was self serving in that it assured the continuation of the monarchy, preventing the rise of Ali'i to challenge the "King", which was also a western concept.

    Of course, this system may seem barbaric by western standards, but who are we to judge? Without feeling a connection to Pele, what right do we have to interfere with their ancestral system of rule, based upon the age old principle of " Might Makes Right"?

  18. I have a surefire way of ending the protest by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 0

    Legalize pot in Hawaii!

    Seriously, I know this whole campaign is a scam whipped up by the Greens. How do I know this? Because not that many years ago they engineered an identical campaign here in Arizona, when University of Arizona, which is a powerhouse in astronomy, first proposed siting large telescopes on Mt Graham in the southeastern corner of the state.

    First they tried the endangered species ploy, claiming that the pine, or red, squirrel populating the peak would be endangered by the presence of astronomers. This fell flat on two grounds: the pine squirrel is common throughout the northern hemisphere, and it is a robust species that thrives in contact with humanity to such an extent that campgrounds often consider it a pest. Then they found someone to claim Native American sacredness for the peak. This proved even less credible than the squirrel argument, because none of our numerous tribes had ever claimed sacred status for Mt Graham when the hunting lodge, state campground and federal prison were all built on the mountain.

    The story of Mt Graham ended happily for science. Though the flat-earth lobby actually used the argument "Send the scopes to Mauna Kea, where there is no opposition and where a 50-acre dedicated astronomy reserve has existed since 1960," several of the world's most prestigious instruments were completed on Mt Graham, and the sky did not fall. In fact, as with all other large observatories, astronomical use has extended a huge umbrella of environmental protection over the region. If the air isn't kept clean, astronomy can't function. Smelter smoke that used to be commonplace is now banned.

    Hawaiians, don't fall for this scam! Now that Greens have clubbed major infrastructure projects to a halt all over the US and Europe, they are moving beyond opposing the applications of science and are starting on science itself. This movement needs to be exposed for what it is before we lose what's left of civilization.

    1. Re:I have a surefire way of ending the protest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Seriously, I know this whole campaign is a scam whipped up by the Greens.

      You are a fucktard.

      Every telescope built on that mountain has been protested. The problem has been that the people protesting are the weakest among us. It took the advent of wide-spread social media for their voices to be heard.

  19. "Strawmen" -- Meh by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Wow. Give us what we want or we will fuck you even harder.

    Are you in the habit of erecting obvious strawmen, or was this particular bit of off-target re-interpretation just special for me?

    Although it does apply to this group -- they're telling the government, "give us what we want, or we'll try to hose some good science" So perhaps your post wasn't a strawman after all. Perhaps you're just confused as to who the culprit is in this situation.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:"Strawmen" -- Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you in the habit of erecting obvious strawmen, or was this particular bit of off-target re-interpretation just special for me?

      Just because you didn't realize you said it, doesn't mean you didn't. There is no such thing as evil in the world. Only myopia. Sorry not sorry that you got smacked with a little bit of your own. Given what the hawaiians have experienced you've got no place to whine.

  20. Extreme case. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    A policy of submitting to demands not to build in holy places is an invitation to abused by jerks. In Australia, there's no place you can go where an aboriginal won't say "That's a holy place." Even if they've never been near the place. I think they make it up as they go.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  21. Science stopped by koan · · Score: 1

    By fairy tales and fantasy.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re: Science stopped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      What purposes would another telescope serve? We don't need further knowledge of the cosmos, simply because there is no point. There is nothing for us out there. Nobody is going to visit other planets, let alone other stars, ever. The future is about learning to live on this planet, and we could use some tolerance. When you grow up you will learn that understanding and respecting other people's beliefs is more important than ogling at some distant pinprick of light nobody is ever going to visit.

    2. Re: Science stopped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, you're a fucking moron.

    3. Re: Science stopped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, what a thoughtful and argumented rebuttal. How old are you, 12? Or are you a retard? When you grow up - if ever - you will learn that life is about compromises and you can't have what you want. Why exactly do you want another big telescope? What else do you want, another supercollider? For what? Where exactly is it helping mankind? You see another exoplanet, it's just another place we can't go. Meanwhile we have REAL issues here on Earth that are not going away while you're dreaming of warp drives and other impossible crap that any sane adult should let go after puberty. Grow up. The real challenges are not in impossible interstellar adventures but in learning how to live here, on the only world we have and will ever have. That includes going along with our fellow humans instead of oppressing, enslave and antagonize them each and every way. That includes learning how to manage our population, how to make the best use of resources, how to put a stop to the inequality that is tearing us apart. Astronomy is not going to solve those issues, it doesn't even address them. You want a telescope? Buy one and shut up. Unless you're one of those "researchers" with no marketable skills who could never fit in the modern economy and who need a safe shelter away from real life doing "science". :)

    4. Re: Science stopped by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      You're posting on the wrong site, buddy. You were looking for is http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/...

      IYou could run for office there. I think the post of He-who-waves-torch-at-bears-at-mouth-of-cave is open.

  22. Just 'migrate' until you take over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's how it works in WHITE countries, isn't it? Unelected Jews tell our 'government' to open the borders, all the while the government tells us how they are going to 'clamp down on immigration', until there are too many third world SHITS living here to expel.

    So just migrate to Hawaii until there are so many people in favour of the telescope that the 'native' people can do nothing about it.

  23. Cut off all Spam to Hawaii by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 2

    In one week the Hawaiians will be begging for the telescope to be built.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  24. What Changed? by chill · · Score: 1

    The mismanagement reports of the 1990s and 2000s existed when the OHA voted in favor of this project in 2009. The size and scope of the telescope hasn't changed since then.

    What is different? Why was this acceptable to them in 2009 but not 2015?

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:What Changed? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Bribes have sort of an expiration date. It's hard to negotiate a new bribe too soon after getting the previous one. The OHA got their concessions in 2009, they feel they can score some more today.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  25. Re:I totally agree with these voices in support of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget to remove all the electric generators and water purification equipment. Also, all hospitals should be immediately destroyed.

  26. I doubt... by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

    I doubt you ever felt guilty in the first place. Too often are people unaware that their wealth, their success, which they attribute to themselves, is actually the fruit of suppressing others, in the past and in the present. And then we don't care anymore. As others remarked, this is sad.

    1. Re:I doubt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The land you live on was stolen from someone else, who stole it from someone before them, and so on. Do you feel guilty about it? What are your plans to return it to them? It's sad, really.

    2. Re:I doubt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I doubt you ever felt guilty in the first place. Too often are people unaware that their wealth, their success, which they attribute to themselves, is actually the fruit of suppressing others, in the past and in the present. And then we don't care anymore. As others remarked, this is sad.

      No, it's not sad at all. It's exactly the opposite, in fact.
      Because when you decide to hold on to those grudges, you end up with a situation where two people have a conflict, and that conflict carries on through generations upon generations until finally you have two groups of people who hate and kill each other for no reason other than it's how things have always been.

      Everything you have, that every human has, is the result of some human fucking over some other ancestor, thousands upon thousands of years ago. What's sad is people like you who would rather pine for a World which vanished centuries ago, than move forward into the future.

  27. Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what religion has always done: raise obstacles against change and progress. Nothing much changes with religion, never has and never will.

  28. the missing piece by prof_robinson · · Score: 0

    What all of you non-political types have been missing: these Hawaiian "indian rights" organizationd, that were being organized by the Democrats, have actually been co-opted by the Chinese, who are funneling millions into Hawaiian separatist movements. They hope to take Hawaii away from us, to punish us for our "meddling". Look it up.

  29. Warmth? by Spazmania · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mehana Kihoi. ... âoeWhen you place your hands and your bare feet into the soil, you feel that warmth, you feel her heart."

    Liar. Had you ever placed your hands and bare feet into the soil at 13,000 feet atop Mauna Kea you'd know that the only things you feel are hypothermia and hypoxia. It's friggin' cold up there, and the air is barely breathable.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:Warmth? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      The liar is you, or you are just an idiot.

      If you have breathing problems at that hight I strongly suggest to consult a medical doctor. A cardiologist perhaps.

      If in summer time it is to cold for you there, you must really be in bad shape, or are you sitting there naked in a storm?

      When you are sitting in a wind proof spot in the day sun, you are grilled in a few minutes. Calling it 'cold' is idiotic!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Warmth? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      Cerro de Pasco

      14,210 ft elevation, pop 70,000, one of many populations this high up.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    3. Re:Warmth? by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      It's typically in the 40's (Fahrenheit). It doesn't get above the 50s. Have you ever actually been to the top of Mauna Kea?

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    4. Re:Warmth? by Spazmania · · Score: 2

      FAR ÃÂ 91.211 Supplemental oxygen

      (1) At cabin pressure altitudes above 12,500 feet (MSL) up to and including 14,000 feet (MSL) unless the required minimum flight crew is provided with and uses supplemental oxygen for that part of the flight at those altitudes that is of more than 30 minutes duration;

      But hey, what does the FAA know about thin air and hypoxia.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    5. Re:Warmth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's typically in the 40's (Fahrenheit). It doesn't get above the 50s. Have you ever actually been to the top of Mauna Kea?

      I have plenty of times. And while you are right that the air is cold. The sun can put a lot of heat into the soil that will radiate back out. On a sunny day the ground can feel warm, especially in comparison to the air.

      And I agree with angel, if you are having problems breathing up there then something is wrong with you. If you are running around, that would be one thing, but sitting or casually walking, not so much.

    6. Re:Warmth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've revealed yourself as a "google expert" - someone who knows nothing about a topic, but googles for stuff to validate his preconceptions but does not even realize they actually contradict him. You'll notice the FAA has that requirement for the minimum flight crew not the full flight crew and certainly not the passengers. If hypoxia were a significant risk then they would mandate oxygen for all evertvidt. Mandating it for the minimum flight crew is about maximizing the safety margin, not preventing hypoxia.

      At this point you have 3 choices:

      (1) Slink away saying nothing
      (2) Take responsibility and admit your error
      (3) Sooth your wounded ego by acting out and insisting on your correctness

      Which will you choose?

    7. Re:Warmth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acclimation. Hawaii is a place where walking around in a bikini is relaxed attire. It isn't Canada. 50 degrees is the equivalent to their coldest winter. The summit is even worse.

      Calling you anything but a buffoon that has more hot air billowing out any given day than the totality of cogent thoughts you have had in your otherwise empty head is what a sane person would call idiotic.

    8. Re:Warmth? by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

      I've been there. At nearly 14k feet it is wear-a-coat cold in the middle of summer on the summit, particularly at sunset (and you really don't want to miss sunset if you make the trek). The air is also very thin. You cannot fly an unpressurized aircraft above that height because of the thin air. FAA regulations require supplemental oxygen to fly above 12,500 feet for more than 30 minutes. Just a short jog uphill will leave you winded, even if you are in really good shape. The visitor's center is at about 9k feet and is much more hospitable.

      There is also a notable lack of soil. It is mostly just rocks. Lots and lots of rocks. I really doubt very many people would be running about barefoot on the summit.

    9. Re:Warmth? by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      I'll take option 4: suggest you try a little google expertise yourself and look up a word: hyperbole.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    10. Re:Warmth? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Obviously I have not,

      But I have been in the Alpes at greater hights in a T-shirt.
      The temperature is irrelevant (because it is air temperature), relevant is sun and wind.

      As long as you are walking and carrying something it does not really matter ... unless you are in a snow storm with real minus degrees (C).

      The parent is just an idiot, or one of the most unhealthy persons on /.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    11. Re:Warmth? by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Is the O2 level different on that mountain for some reason? I've been at 14,000 feet on Mount Adams and could breath fairly well.

  30. Most posts here are missing the point by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Most posts here I see are talking about the merits of native title, what it means to be able to claim native title, and who is the native in the first place (Native Title is what land ownership is called in some countries). But really the core point is written write in the summary:

    The vote, which reverses a 2009 decision to endorse the project

    They endorsed the project and now have withdrawn their support after construction has started. Talk about screwing over a major project. Is there any recourse the project has to prevent them from pulling shit like that again? In commercial terms a breach of contract like this would result in an incredible payout to the affected parties.

    The company I work for has been through some similar crap before. One of our projects was delayed by 3 years due to someone claiming native title on the land where it was supposed to go ahead. The kicker... it was reclaimed land that was built in the 60s. Somehow I don't think a 300 year old aboriginal tribe had a campsite in the middle of the ocean. The courts agreed but it still presented a huge cost to fight the legal battle and a 3 year delay in the project.

    People who pull stunts like this should have their right to making such claims revoked or should have to pay compensation to the projects they screw over.

    1. Re:Most posts here are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, read the article. The endorsement, or lack thereof, has absolutely nothing to do with the ability of the telescope to get built. Thus, no breach of contract or anything of that sort.

  31. Cancel *EVERYTHING* by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    Stop all federal funding for new construction projects in all of Hawaii. Cancel everything. Close all federally funded operations. Close Pearl Harbor and move the base back to the mainland. Cut all federal spending for Hawaii, including energy, roads, and education.

    There, now Hawaii is protected.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Cancel *EVERYTHING* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only I could get the Feds to pack up and leave my state - rejoice!

    2. Re:Cancel *EVERYTHING* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop all federal funding for new construction projects in all of Hawaii. Cancel everything. Close all federally funded operations. Close Pearl Harbor and move the base back to the mainland. Cut all federal spending for Hawaii, including energy, roads, and education.

      There, now Hawaii is protected.

      Some would want that... may sound like a bit of sarcasm there, but I am serious.

      Great Mahele, what a farce.

      Make sure you stop funding the Micronesians too, this is Polynesia. Have them go to California and drain their resources.

  32. Re:It Does NOT Work Both Ways by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

    Oh is this the standard now? Where do you live? I'm sure I can find someone's ancestors to sue you for the land. Idiot.

  33. American Imperialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't believe there was ever American imperialism, then open a book to Hawaii. Hawaii is a remanent of our imperialist days. And while you may think that all Hawaiians are happy to operate a successful tourism and agriculture industry, they were never given any choice in the matter.

  34. Referring to leaders of 1800's or 2000's ? by drnb · · Score: 1

    Too often are people unaware that their wealth, their success, which they attribute to themselves, is actually the fruit of suppressing others, in the past and in the present. And then we don't care anymore.

    Are you referring to the leaders and the wealthy of the 1800's (the Hawaiian Royalty who gained their position through conquest) or those of the 2000's (the US)? Because your point applies equally well to the current government and the previous government that some are thinking of as the good old days. You do realize that some of the Hawaiian holy sites are holy because that is where the conquerors from another island who declared themselves royal had massacred the locals who dared to not recognize them and/or resisted? The unification of the Hawaiian islands by the royalty was a particular bloody affair.

    1. Re:Referring to leaders of 1800's or 2000's ? by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

      While my statement may also hold for those wealthy leaders of 1800 (thanks for that piece of info, btw), I was referring to today. The people from 1800 are no longer alive and can no longer ponder on this. Judging from your comment, I don't expect you to do so either, and maybe it was poorly formulated. "flaming error" did a better job, and I regret he is not modded higher.

      The point I wanted to make, is that one of the reasons why the western world is doing relatively well nowadays, is because we stole from other countries (colonies) in the past and continue to do so today. Let the Chinese pollute their country and buy stuff cheaply. Buy cheap resources from Africa and South America. And feel good about ourselves because injustice is not literally carried out by our own hands. That these things happen is sad. Explicitly saying one "no longer feels guilty" (which, as mentioned, probably never happened before either) is ignorant and imho unfair.

  35. NIMBYs suck farts off dead chickens in August by msobkow · · Score: 1

    NIMBY's suck farts off dead chickens in August. And if you've ever smelt a rotting chicken in the August heat, you know how revolting that is.

    The job of a NIMBY is to do whatever they can to obstruct progress. Whether they do it to "protect property values", "save the children", or "stand up for our (religious) rights", they all do the same thing in the end: Say "No" without providing any options.

    Every nation in this world is full of conquered peoples. There are more "sacred places" than you can shake a stick at, and I challenge you to pick a direction and walk twenty miles without running into someone's "sacred" place. Yet when is the last time you ever saw them worshipping there?

    Yeah. Right.

    Never.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:NIMBYs suck farts off dead chickens in August by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, it's not entirely religion. That's just one legal avenue to block "progress." If it wasn't sacred land, it would be an endangered chipmunk or mushroom. If it wasn't that, it would be to prevent damage to the ecosystem.

      I'm all for progress. But claiming that you want progress while spitting on those who stand passively or actively in your way is stupid. Unfortunately it's how a lot of academics and "scientists" behave. I've personally witnessed it at similar facilities. (I was an engineer at a telescope.)

  36. Blame it on 'Political Correctness' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, that's a bullshit line of reasoning in a lot of ways (as I discuss here [slashdot.org]). Is this a shakedown for money by activist leaders or way of inciting anger for their own political gains?

    Look at it this way, if not because of that goddamn POLITICAL CORRECTNESS bovine turd none of them would be identified as 'native Hawaiians' because they are not!

    How can they be 'native' when their ancestors didn't evolve on the island of Hawaii? Their ancestors came from elsewhere, from Asia, mainly

    It is because of the goddamn POLITICAL CORRECTNESS that those money suckers are emboldened with the 'Native Hawaiian' badges, and with those goddamn badges they got to dictate what can anyone do (or not do) on a piece of real estate on the island

    Fuck 'em!

    Science waits for no one --- and the world should never be held ransom by a bunch of greedy motherfucking assholes

    Just go ahead and build the telescope - for that hill does not belong to them in the first place --- like everything else, it belongs to the world at large

  37. There are two issues here that are being balanced by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    On the one hand you have an indigenous population that basically had their land stolen from them and their country coopted by the US.

    Nothing new for the US only it happened a good deal later than usual. But most Americans believe we should be respectful of these people and do our level best to see that we do what we can to make the nastiness of whole situation more bearable. To that end, they were given exclusive control over one of the smaller Islands along with a lot of rights and subsidies etc. Does that make up for what happened? Nope. Nothing short of leaving the islands and making restitution can really make up for it. But that isn't going to happen.

    Then you have the issue of how the islands are used now that they are a US state? The natives are blocking a lot of stuff that makes things difficult. They have some sort of religious connection to the volcano and that makes using it for anything difficult. Geothermal power for example could power all the islands. Instead we tank in diesel fuel to run diesel generators. Some sort of compromise needs to be worked out there. Maybe let the natives help design and then operate the power plants and telescopes? I think the power companies and scientists would be happy to make them administrators of these facilities etc so long as they took up the positions in good faith.

    It just seems like these things are hitting impasses for no good reason. The natives aren't getting their islands back. But they can take a leadership role in various controversial projects if they are worried about their sacred spaces being desecrated. No one wants to offend them. Help us not do that and offer a more constructive solution besides banning vital technology.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  38. Re:It Does NOT Work Both Ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a US tax payer, I certainly have standing. Hawaiian public lands are as much subject to federal legislation and control as public lands near where I live. Your racist idea that having Polynesian ancestry gives you special privileges simply has no legal or moral significance.

  39. While I have some sympathy for some arguments here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure that telling Native Hawaiians, basically, "Yeah, the U.S. government stole your entire kingdom. So what? We won, you lost, it was over long ago, get over it" is the way to win hearts and minds.

  40. Extreme views on all sides. by Shag · · Score: 1

    Congratulations, fellow Slashdotters, for (predictably?) hewing to the opposite end of the spectrum from the people in the articles.

    If their side says, "Hawaiian culture and spirituality is of paramount importance, your science has no place on our sacred mountain," calling them extreme and then saying that science is of paramount importance and their culture and spirituality should be given no weight whatsoever... doesn't make you look like the good guys. In fact, it only gives them more evidence that supporters of science are every bit as extreme and closed-minded.

    I work full-time at a big telescope on Maunakea, and have a further part-time job using one of the smaller telescopes on Maunakea, as well as other jobs outside astronomy. I go to Maunakea in person, and interact with TMT's opponents in person. The situation is a lot more nuanced to me than a bunch of Internet Tough Guys could hope to begin to understand, but I just wanted to let you know that no, you're actually not helping.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    1. Re:Extreme views on all sides. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The situation is a lot more nuanced to me than a bunch of Internet Tough Guys could hope to begin to understand

      and the name calling and blame loop restarts

  41. Sorry state of humankind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Skimming this comment tsunami makes me sad.

    Being a phisicist by training and a hacker by trade, I still can't understand this "science trumps everything" and, even worse "economics trumps everything" attitude, which is just as blind an ideology as the worst of all religions.

    Calling dissenting opinions "nutjobs", "whackos" or whatever doesn't help in the least: we have to respect each other, discuss, and reach a consensus. Many times this consensus won't please "us" or "them", but that's how life works.

    Most of the comment tsunami here feels like the worst of crusades. "SHOW THEM THE CROSS!" "BURN THEM WITH FIRE!" "WE'RE FUCKING RIGHT!. Disgusting.

  42. Hipocrits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile they drive their gas guzzling SUVs up the mountain to protests. Nevermind the polluting the air. Don't forget to bring some unsustainably caught tuna for some poke for lunch while they're up there. Hawaiians are so American that they don't even realize it.

  43. Stop taking their meth away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and the problem will self correct shortly

  44. Re:Is it too late to rename the Laniakea Superclus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Is it too late to rename the Laniakea Supercluster

    Just like all the indians think the US military using their culture for mascots is great too.

  45. World's largest telescope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    itmos bad enough the as.S. Cancelled the huge particle accelerator intended to be built in Texas some years ago. Are they also going to forego this telescope for the nonsense of a few primitives? Seems likely. It is time to put religion..whatever and whichever it is where it belongs..in the dustbin of history..the whole thing is truly bizarre. That it is taken seriously shows just how gutless the policies have become wherein people now refuse vaccines and are allowed to, where pure science is consider a friviality, where the only place on the planet to build such a telescope is being prevented by ignorance???? I am appalled...it affects many other nations who have invested research and development in this instrument.