Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft-Backed Think Tank: K-12 CS Education Cure For Sagging US Productivity

theodp writes: On May 6, notes think tank Brookings, the Department of Labor released labor productivity data showing that output per worker fell by 1.9 percent during the first quarter of 2015. But fear not — the Metropolitan Policy Program of [Microsoft-backed] Brookings says K-12 computer science education is the cure for what ails U.S. productivity: "So how can the United States reverse this trend? First, states, metropolitan areas, and school districts must recognize that basic digital literacy is no longer sufficient preparation for the 21st century workforce. Familiarity with higher-level skills such as coding will be critical as the role of technology continues to grow. The 60-plus school districts that have partnered with [Microsoft-backed] Code.org have already begun to move in this direction. By introducing students to computer science fundamentals early on, Code.org and its partner districts will help get more people on pathways to well-paying jobs in computer programming and other fields." Creating a national K-12 CS and tech immigration crisis was proposed as Microsoft introduced its 'two-pronged' National Talent Strategy to increase K-12 CS education and the number of H-1B visas at a Brookings event in 2012. While creating a K-12 CS crisis fell to Code.org, fanning the flames of a tech immigration crisis is the purvey of [Microsoft exec-backed] FWD.us, the PAC formed by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, which recently sent an email blast warning U.S. citizens they're in 'A Gigantic Global Talent War', adding that China and India citizens are "just laughing [at the US], saying it's so easy to pick from you guys... we just take all the talent."

131 comments

  1. How... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... is any level of western education going to make it cost-competitive to those at the distant ends of the ethernet cable? Better to help them improve their lifestyles such that they insource to western neighborhoods...

    1. Re:How... by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      is any level of western education going to make it cost-competitive to those at the distant ends of the ethernet cable? Better to help them improve their lifestyles such that they insource to western neighborhoods...

      That's a shockingly insightful question for a /. FP! There's two separate issue here, if most of the good jobs in the future are something to do with automation (as seems likely).

      How do we make life better here by ensuring we have our share of people who can code - at least code enough for some other technical specialty once everything it? We definitely need to make CS as much a core subject as math, Few people are professional mathematicians (the recent fad in "data science" notwithstanding), but for decades previous most of the good jobs required at least basic math, for cost-benefit analysis and so on. Now simple coding is the same way: it's becoming important to decision making across new professions every year.

      Separately, is this all a race to the bottom? Million-dollar houses in Bangalore say no. The average price of a 3-bedroom house there is over $250k, has been for a while - more than many places in the US. It takes time for developing nations to develop, emerging economies to emerge, but it does happen. And it's terrific for the world that it does - we have no special moral right to a better standard of living than anyplace else where CS grads want a job, and it's not a zero-sum game. Until we reach the Singularity, we're not going to run out of tasks to automate.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:How... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As long as people can live on less than 1/2 the wages in these areas, the US workforce will never be able to compete. For instance, a pound of rice or a loaf of bread costs less than $0.50. And when you consider that they're comparing equivalent lifestyles, not the average lifestyle in each area, that wage disparity grows even larger. Now, in a truly global economy, we (US folks) would buy up all this cheap rice instead of our very expensive rice. Why doesn't this happen? Because we're not in a global economy, obviously.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    3. Re:How... by lgw · · Score: 1

      My first software development job paid $18k the first year. In a major US city. I competed. And I was already living like a student, with 2 roommates in a scary neighborhood, so I was just happy for my big break! I make rather more now (and all the electronics I wanted back then cost less now - yay technology).

      Rice costs money to ship. Programming can be done anywhere. That's the world we live in, it's up to us to succeed in that world. And we certainly can, for demand continues to exceed supply of talent! The talent pool was growing exponentially for most of my career, doubling every few years as new regions come online. Now it's just linear - n new compsci grads every year. Now it seems clear it isn't a race to the bottom, but instead a source of uplift worldwide.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:How... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MS and Zuck don't care. Their agenda is to saturate the market with qualified candidates, thereby commoditizing all computer work, be it programming, admin, or support roles. This drives down the price of employees. They won't be happy until you're working for minimum wage and no vacation, or just outright owning you as a slave.

    5. Re:How... by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't you find it... questionable that so much corporate welfare and education reform is solely to create widgets for Microsoft to use? Of all the education reforms I could think of, adding coding to a core curriculum that mismanages so many other things seems questionable, although I applaud Microsoft's benevolence with tax money they aren't paying.

      Certainly biotechnology is also an expanding field for the future. Do American workers have a solid basing in science to fulfill those needs? Prostitution also seems to be a growing field. Are American workers ready to accept the challenges?

      Maybe it would be nice to consult the general public about education reforms they would like to see, especially since they are the one's primarily paying for it. I'd personally like to see logic introduced into the core curriculum so maybe more voters would be able to call bullshit on initiatives like these.

      It also gives people a solid basing to pursue coding if they wish.

      Oh, in passing, has their been a study on CEO productivity recently? While it is wonderful that worker productivity is of such great importance to require furrowed brows over a 2% drop, my own think tank suggests that loss can more than be made up for by eliminating much of the corruption in business and government, so we won't have to endure further rounds of "nice economy you've got there. It would be a shame if something were to happen to it".

    6. Re:How... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps a "computer class" in middle school. 45 instructional hours (45+ minutes per hour). Where one school week is dealt with programming. The class would focus on navigating operating systems, installing them, dealing with hardware, networking, proper typing, how the Internet works, etc. Otherwise, I think we're good other than some electives in high school.

    7. Re:How... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I guarantee you it doesn't cost double the cost of a pound of rice to ship rice, not even close. I can ship a 4000 pound vehicle overseas for $600, which works out to about $0.15 per pound, and is considerably more valuable and fragile and possibly larger than 4000 pounds of rice. So I call BS on that.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    8. Re:How... by lgw · · Score: 1

      And so what? Regardless of that and every other such factor, we have a really nice standard of living, which naturally isn't cheap. And programming can easily be done anywhere. So that's the world as we find it, and it's one in which we can compete, and we can succeed. The programming culture of Silly Valley and now Seattle is a testament to that: a fairly representative sample of programmers the world over including, yes, Americans, being paid quite well indeed even by American standards.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    9. Re:How... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Of course, unless things have changed dramatically since the last time I paid attention, a 3 bedroom house in China is liable to be a much higher status thing than it is in the US, owned primarily by executives and the like. May as well try to judge the economic wellbeing of the workers at a major jewelery store by the average price of Ferrari's in the parking lot.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    10. Re:How... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      The best of us compete well. The average to just below the best have challenges, and they are the ones being replaced by H1Bs and other modes of "ditching American workers", because sweatshop wages are what they are. It's hard to replace the artist, but easy to replace the brush cleaner. What those that are doing this are not seeing for the next quarters profit report is that by not training any of the average to above average people, they're significantly reducing the pool of those that potentially could become the best in the future.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    11. Re:How... by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thing is, when I went to school... mumble, mumble years ago, there was a basic computing courses available, as well as a computer lab with instructors overseeing it that taught basic coding and other bits if they saw you putting in the effort to learn.

      But there was also music classes, art classes, PE, etc. I'd be had pressed to say a computing course served me better than the art course, but imagine some think tank arguing that art education should be reintroduced so people could better understand relationships, abstract thinking, and non-verbal communication.

      Not nearly as sexy without the implied "or else you will be scuttled for a cheaper body in India".

      Anyway, now all that has been replaced with the advisor to the advisor to the assistant manger of the vice principal, and everyone being very sage about how to best spend other people's money, and near hysterics about how a 2% increase in taxes will collapse the economy. But only for them. If you have to pay more, well that a just sacrifice for the good of our tax structure in Nevada.

      So after gutting the educational system, now it's a Big Problem, and requires immediate money so you can finance being a plebe to them for ever.

      Fuck 'em.

    12. Re:How... by scamper_22 · · Score: 2

      I think this whole education solves all is a giant hail mary wish.

      I'm in Canada and this is all we hear as the solution as well. Economy is going down, jobs leaving... invest in education.

      Yet, where are the results? Nortel collapse. BB not doing too well. Skilled foreign workers programs. Can anyone tell me why we waste all this money on Western education if we're just going to import our skilled labor? If they can do the work, maybe all this spending on education is a waste. Seems they can spend much less and get good people.

      You look at the US as well. Ok, some great companies in the US. No doubt about it. Here's a small hint to people. The US has over 300 000 000 people.

      Heck, here's some perspective. Silicon Valley can't even provide prosperity for California. Just let that sink in. These guys talk about technology and education bringing prosperity to a whole country. Yet, it can't even bring prosperity to a single state.

      Globally there's probably 6 or 7 billion people. Are we all going to be coders? Seriously...

      Software and technology definitely gets people some jobs. But it pales in comparison to hundreds of millions and billions of people. But of course, rather than deal with this reality, our leaders just say... somehow if we pour enough into education, magic will come out and bring back the 1990s or whatever.

      It's all they can think I guess.
      I don't have all the answers, but we put way too much thought into education and far too little into everything else.

      Germany is a huge powerhouse. They also have a big industrial policy. Ditto for China. And China has huge state firms and state lending.

      I'm personally just sick of the education solves all problems that dominates North America. Where the hell are the results of all these?
      Again, I'm not saying we don't need an educated populace. It's just does not solve the problem of jobs/prosperity.

      I liken it to the great myth of solving healthcare costs. Only politicians and even people like to trot out that prevention will fix healthcare costs. It sounds nice, prevention is low cost and you won't need expensive surgery.

      Of course, the data doesn't support that.
      http://www.cbc.ca/news/technol...

      Basically, most costs are in old age anyways. In the big picture, unhealthy people are actually cheaper to treat because they die sooner.

      Instead of dealing with the reality of old age costs, and the nasty debate of that (rationing, death panels...), we all just throw a hail mary at prevention.

      Education sounds similar. A giant hail mary to solve a problem it can't.

    13. Re:How... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      My first software development job paid $18k the first year.

      Meaningless without knowing which year that was.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:How... by techfilz · · Score: 1

      Spot on. Everyone with a degree or a diploma wants a better life, and there is simply not enough money going around to provide that. Helping the populace develop some basic coding skills is useless - what do they do with these skills ? It does not mean that lots of people become coders capable of working on enterprise level software ? And if they have half a brain they will know that IT is not going to be the field of their dreams. The competition with India and China is economic - they can survive on a lot less money and in the USA you can't. So yes, this is a drive towards the bottom. As salaries and living standards in China and India adjust upwards, it will be easier for the West to compete - but our salaries and living standards would need to go down substantially. And there will be no money for the welfare state to support us if we are ill or out of work. There are plenty of other nations like Vietnam standing by to provide coders when the Chinese or Indian ones get too expensive. What I find most appalling is that when I started out in IT , it was a middle class White Collar job. We were well paid professionals with some respect in the market and aspirations. Now the best we can come up with as a replacement job is fixing toilets or cutting hair.

    15. Re:How... by lgw · · Score: 1

      by not training any of the average to above average people, they're significantly reducing the pool of those that potentially could become the best in the future.

      I've worked with dozens, perhaps hundreds of above average people who have the opportunity to become the best in the future because they were brought here on H1-Bs. There will always be sweatshops - I started in one myself, and it's the only way I was able to break into the industry. But that's separate from the core issue: humanity benefits the most as a whole from tapping the largest talent pool to push technology forward.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    16. Re:How... by lgw · · Score: 1

      In India (where Bangalore is) , software developer is the high-status job. It's higher status and better paying than a doctor or a lawyer. We're talking average house prices for a city of over 8 million here. Successful software developers tend to have staff: beyond a maid and gardener as you might find in the US, a nanny, a driver, perhaps a cook. Sure, those jobs aren't providing a first-world standard of living, but the software jobs are coming close (you have the staff, but there's very little in affordable consumer electronics).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    17. Re:How... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Globally there's probably 6 or 7 billion people. Are we all going to be coders? Seriously...

      No one is suggesting that we're all going to be software developers. But increasingly you need some coding, or DB, or other "automation" skills to be better at other professional jobs, much like you need high school math for many professional jobs today.

      We certainly need to break from our current educational system that was explicitly designed to create good manufacturing workers (with any knowledge transfer being secondary to that goal). Manufacturing jobs were great jobs 100 years ago, and that system made sense at the time, but it's really hurting us now. Changing that focus to teaching kids how to think abstractly and solve technical problems of any description -- well, it's not going to fix everything, but it will help.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    18. Re:How... by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

      I really don't think it will help. I actually think it is hurting us.

      As they say, putting money/effort into one thing takes money/effort from other things.

      I think we put enough money into education; especially k-12. Speaking in Canada here, but I suspect the same is true in most parts of the US. The spending is there.

      But is the spending there for say infrastructure/transit? Is it there to support an industrial policy? Is it there to support job sharing/reduced hours?...

    19. Re: How... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      germany is an idiots house which consumes their population for some shekels. population is replaced by random immigrants. no real innovation to be seen here. just effeicient car businesses. turning german families into carriages. fertility 1.4 kids per woman. everybody so busy they cannot have kids. a hellhole.

      my father and mother were german and i still live and work here. quick and dirty is the new mantra.

    20. Re:How... by lgw · · Score: 1

      That's not a trade-off that's important in the US. The federal government only spends 11% of it's budget on all that sort of thing: education, infrastructure, etc. We don't need to take from one to give more to the other. We spend 65% of the budget mailing checks to people, and that's the part we'd need to political will to cut in order to fund other things.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    21. Re:How... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I've worked with dozens, perhaps hundreds of above average people who have the opportunity to become the best in the future because they were brought here on H1-Bs.

      And I have worked with hundreds of far below average H1-Bs. In fact, I'd be happy to have stated I worked with a handful of average H1-Bs, but that's not happened. So what? It's anecdotal, until there's an overwhelming set of anecdotes about the lack of above average H1-Bs with almost 0 supporting that case.* I'm sure it happens, but it's an exception rather than the rule. And given that they are average, there's no reason you can't hire an average american to work instead. Until that is handled, there's no reason to bring in more H1-Bs.

      * - note that it is still anecdotal until someone actually does a decent study to determine the actual reality.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    22. Re:How... by lgw · · Score: 1

      I rather suspect it depends on the quality of company one works for. I've seen dozens of low-quality devs (who worked from India) when I work for cheap places, but even then, the few they were willing to pay to bring to the US were the cream of that crop.

      Did you interview the H1-B guys just like everyone else? Or was this some outsourcing thing? I've found that usually when people are complaining about "H1-Bs" their complains are really about shitty contractors in general.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    23. Re:How... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Now simple coding is the same way: it's becoming important to decision making across new professions every year.

      Unless by "simple coding" you mean "the ability to type a formula in Excel" I just don't see this happening.

      The mistake a lot of people on slashdot make is thinking that all professions and businesses are like tech start ups. If you're a management consultant, divorce lawyer or something, you will not be spending any of your valuable (billable) time messing around with software design. Someone else will do that for you.

      Software in most businesses is another overhead, like IT infrastructure, or office cleaning.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    24. Re:How... by lgw · · Score: 1

      No manager would be learning to use a word processor, that's crazy talk - they won't be wasting their valuable time when they already have a secretary for this!

      Same thing. Word processors meant that the overhead cost of the secretarial pool was eliminated, and everyone was expected to be able to create their own documents.

      You mention "typing formulas into Excel", but you don't seem to realize there's an entire coding culture there already. You can't get very far without VBA scripts (or whatever the current MS language is for Excel), and it's all done by people with no or little formal CS training re-inventing the simplest of wheels. A bit of CS training in school would go a long way there.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    25. Re:How... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      This was across multiple companies, just pointing to the fact that many companies fail in this area. I will say I have yet to see 1 successful project that succeeded with large numbers of H1Bs, or any outsourcing project, in many many years.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    26. Re:How... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This picture most accurately depicts the "progress" we made from the days of top of the world US competitiveness and vitality to today. If it included other numbers such as number of unemployed, federal debt levels, family population growth rates of working vs. welfare people, housing cost and insurance cost as a percentage of budget, legal and healthcare and education prices, you could see better why the US is so uncompetitive, compared to how it used to be: the cost of living, or the drain rate of the population is like it used to be in Jamestown before everyone was set free to keep what they are working to obtain. People don't have a strong incentive to create if it's all taken away from them, just like in Jamestown, where people loitered about, were bowling in the streets instead of working when the fruits of their labors had to be all handed over, and everything was taken from them, and they starved off and died. And all Obamacare does is makes that picture a lot worse. Without surplus the population growthrate stagnates too along with economic vitality, and presently only on welfare are families able to have a guaranteed lot of surplus, and there must be a welfare population explosion while the taxpayers feeding that welfare system are dying off and going extinct, and here comes Obamacare putting an extra strain on the whole circus, forcing even more people unto government aid payments, and more improperly allocated resources. How to solve the health care cost problem? How much is your life and health worth to you? 900 billion dollars. Go fuck yourself. Doctors had to work for free? boo hoo hoo. They still rake in the dough and make a killing compared to everyone else anyway. The real problem is doctors sending you huge bills, and that's what needs to be worked on. Too expensive equipment, too expensive pharmaceuticals, too expensive staff salaries. If we want to fix the healthcare cost problems it's not by making everyone pay out the ass over it, but let's nitpick at people making money in health care and get them aligned with the rest of the population. As long as we're talking non free market mandatory purchases forced by Obamacare. See I don't have a problem with hospital equipment prices, or doctor and nurse salaries, as long as I can live my life ignoring them, and I'm not forced to purchase services, or they are optional. Once you force me, then we start at the nitpicking. Hey, you started it. It's like live your life and do whatever you want as long as you leave me the fuck alone and let me live and do whatever I want, but once you start fucking with me, and nitpicking on me, it comes right back at you, dear healthcare people. Let's talk about the huge unfair salaries y'all rake in without working your asses off for it, playing God with other people's lives pretending you know and understand stuff, yet losing patients left and right to death anyway, how about the huge prices you pay for your equipment and huge pharmaceutical drug prices that don't even work. As long as we're talking health care cost, because Obamacare puts it all in the forefront. That's even before nitpicking on the insurance bullshit profit margins and complicated policies. Insurance policies should be one quarter page long, mandated by law. No fucking bullshit fine print all over the fucking place. And profit margin should be regulated to something like 3-5%, and if any insurance company is caught making more, without handing it over to the federal government jail the officers for life and shut them down. Then we can talk mandatory purchases. Let's nitpick at everyone involved in these costs, once you start harassing me, let's harass you too. See I love insurance available as an option, at whatever profit marging they friggin please offering it at, as long as I'm not forced to purchase, as long as I can choose to purchase or not. It's much better than not having it as an option. But when you force me to purchase at whatever prices it's offered that I might find unfair, the nitpicking at prices starts, and it trickles down to insuranc

  2. aw, c'mon, man by turkeydance · · Score: 3, Funny

    it'll all be robots before this idea works.

  3. Why limit to just CS education? by ranton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is pretty obvious to me that our country's productivity and economy in general will improve if we improve CS based education. But that is simply because increasing education in general will help our economy. There are very few ways a country can actually invest in its economy in the long term. Improving education. increasing funding of both private and public research, and improving infrastructure are the only ways that come to mind.

    So while improving CS education is a great idea, I see no reason why it needs to be singled out.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    1. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by taiwanjohn · · Score: 0

      If only I had mod points...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    2. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because Microsoft and Facebook want and abundant (and therefore cheap & expendable) workforce.

    3. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by eclectro · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are very few ways a country can actually invest in its economy in the long term.

      You mean besides dealing with the grotesque wage inequality that we have now?

      People always thought that deflation (worse than inflation) would happen when a large quantity of out of work people would be unable to buy things, leading to a collapse in prices. But it can also happen through wage stagnation where people are working, but because their wage and buying power do not increase, they simply do not have the means to be consumers and grow the economy. So you end up with the same surplus of goods and services that people are unable to buy, leading to deflationary price collapses. People also put off marriage when they are poor, and there are less consuming families also. Think of an economic drought, just like California has a water drought.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    4. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Computer education is pointless. Why be trained in any profession if that profession is going to end up extinct in the areas that need employed people to patronize the local businesses, pay the taxes, and so forth?

      If they were serious about making a sustainable economy, they'd ditch the whole drone-level skill training program and focus on how to start your own business and thus avoid the layoff treadmill. After all, isn't that what we're told? The only job that's safe is the one you make yourself?

      That means teaching kids at an early age how to meet prospective clients (this does not come naturally or easily to us introverts), negotiate favorable contracts (ditto), manage the various legal and financial aspects of running a company, manage staff - for those who washed out on the whole run-your-own-company deal, and ... if you're fortunate, learn a constructive skill to sell in whatever spare time remains.

      That's basically what the local business dynasties do anyway. They're brought up learning how to lead, how to negotiate, how to deal with people, then sent to schools of like-minded people so that they'll have all the right connections.

    5. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by timm0 · · Score: 1

      Yup!

    6. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 2

      No, it is not obvious. Since 1995 we are used to 3% productivity gains, and a general slowdown in innovation means it is harder to squeeze more work out of each person.

      Email, word processing, instant messenger, desktop sharing, video conferences, and piles of other stuff that are now commonplace did not exist most places. Sure there were precursors back to the 70's, but I'm talking widespread adoption of all of those and more.

      America's productivity is largely due to 50 hour work weeks, and if you measure output per hour, 37 hour weeks take the top 2 spots (year old data).

      Increasing education isn't going to give Americans the ability to do 50 hours of work in 40 hours, and innovation from overseas isn't going to just stop at the water, so its not like there is a magical productivity device that America lacks.

      Increasing education is incredibly vague, and your understanding is lacking, so "obvious" just means "after little thought and no consideration of alternatives, the only idea that occurred to me."

      http://business.time.com/2013/...

    7. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      You can't always have "productivity gains", just like you can't always have a rising stock market. If people are moving from full-time to part-time jobs because of scaled-back demand, of course how much each worker produces will drop. Also, they're forgetting about the oil glut's impact on the economy - people are spending less on gas so you're going to have a drop in GDP even if productivity stays the same.

      Of course, the people pushing "moar koderz" are the ones who will benefit the most, with the downward pressure of wages in the sector.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    8. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by penguinoid · · Score: 2

      It would be like if an airline backed think tank suggested piloting and aviation repair education as a cure for the sagging economy.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    9. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by westlake · · Score: 1

      Because Microsoft and Facebook want and abundant (and therefore cheap & expendable) workforce.

      The geek is economically and socially illiterate.

      What Microsoft and Facebook needs are customers who feel financially secure, have a generous amount of disposable income, and the more of them, the better.

      Microsoft typically pays about 15% above market. The lowliest entry level software engineer at Microsoft earns about $80,000/yr. Average Salary for Microsoft Corp Employees

      The median household income in the US is $52,000.

    10. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      My jaded mind wonders if productivity won't be limited as more people realize just how badly they're being screwed and no longer want to slave away for some guy just because he is rich.

    11. Re: Why limit to just CS education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except the prices for everything go up anyway. :(

    12. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As evident by the increase in H1B's requested, when there are many US based CS grads that don't have jobs and cant seem to get them either.

    13. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      The problem is that if you improve education overall, the current political class would not survive that. They are just barely scraping by by keeping the population in fear as it is. The last thing they want is citizens that actually understand how they are ripped off and manipulated.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    14. Re:Why limit to just CS education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Microsoft and Facebook want and abundant (and therefore cheap & expendable) workforce.

      The geek is economically and socially illiterate.

      What Microsoft and Facebook needs are customers who feel financially secure, have a generous amount of disposable income, and the more of them, the better.

      Microsoft typically pays about 15% above market. The lowliest entry level software engineer at Microsoft earns about $80,000/yr. Average Salary for Microsoft Corp Employees

      The median household income in the US is $52,000.

      You're going to have to control for where MS employees work if you're going to compare their average salary against average income across the entire states. If the majority of MS's employment occurs in areas with a high cost of living, $80k may have less buying power than another location that pays $40,000.

  4. China and India citizens are "just laughing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    China and India are hellholes. If we try to match them, the US will be one as well.

    1. Re: China and India citizens are "just laughing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. If China and India really were just picking from us, why is it that seemingly every Chinese and Indian citizen wants to leave his home country and head for the U.S. or Europe? Likewise, why isn't there a deluge of people in the U.S. and Europe wanting to move to China or India?

      Zuckerberg's argument is so asinine and entirely self-serving that I seriously doubt anyone in the U.S., as ignorant as average Americans are, believes it.

  5. Why bother? by fredrated · · Score: 2

    We now know that virtually all productivity gains go to the top 1%, there is no incentive to increase productivity if it all goes to our masters.

    1. Re:Why bother? by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This. Before we try to whip our kids harder, we should probably give them an incentive to work in the first place.

      The American Dream used to be "work hard, climb the ladder, be successful, grow rich". That dream's over. Working hard only means that your boss gets rich. You stay poor.

      The new American Dream is "buy a lottery ticket and hope to get run over by a rich guy so you can sue them". Because that's sadly the only way left for anyone who doesn't already belong to the self proclaimed elite to get rich.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The American Dream used to be "work hard, climb the ladder, be successful, grow rich". That dream's over. Working hard only means that your boss gets rich. You stay poor.

      The American Dream has never been anything but that - a dream. Where are all these mythical nouveau riche from the Golden Age that never existed outside the misinterpreted historical fantasies people have? Right. They don't exist. Because no, sorry, you never had a fifty-fifty chance of going from digging through garbage cans for your meals to owning senators.

      The American Reality has been work hard and intelligently, climb the ladder, be successful, live pretty fucking decently.

      And the American Reality is still in full effect. People continue to improve their wealth on a massive scale. Wealth continues to grow exponentially through generational passing. And hell, it's actually easier now to become one of those fancy-schmancy "rich" people - doesn't take a Carnegie to write a successful mobile app.

    3. Re:Why bother? by An+Ominous+Coward · · Score: 1

      buy a lottery ticket and hope to get run over by a rich guy so you can sue them

      And the latter part of that dream manages to be an even worse proposal than the former:

      http://www.dailykos.com/story/...

    4. Re:Why bother? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if that is true everywhere in western countries, or if that gain goes to the rich, government, or a growing number of unproductive people. But the numbers in my own country (NL) don't lie: productivity has risen steadily for decades, but somewhere in the 90s purchasing power flattened out and has remained more or less the same for 2 decades or so.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Before telling someone about the American Reality, please visit reality first.

      Wealth for the lowest 50% has stagnated or dropped. With inflation, that means the bottom ~3/4 are stagnant in buying power or dropping. Growth has only been for the richest few.

      And that "wealth gnerational passing" is why: someone who happened to be born to wealthy parents will find it easy to get rich. The opportunities are taken by them. There aren't any left for those who weren't born to rich parents.

      And because that wealth is passed on to people you popped out, you will hoard it, because it is currently power and position, and it will remain that merely for existing: no need to spend that power and reduce your position. And your children will get it, so best to keep building it up higher, because there's only one of you, and several kids to divvy it out on. And taxes are bad, because that money is being STOLEN FROM YOUR KIDS!!! So tax (especially inheritance tax) is an abomination unto the lord.

      So money is being hoarded. The government makes money not on tax, but on the MOVEMENT of money.

      But those with wealth are not spending it. It would reduce their power and position, and deny their progeny that power when they inherit (if it were deserved, they wouldn't NEED the money: they'd have made that or more well before you died. they'd only need it if they were worthless bags of water that don't deserve to wipe counters). Those without money spend it all (plus some, but that's borrowed from rich people, who skim off the extra, being a "trickle up" of REAL economics), but don't have much, so tax revenue goes down.

      The wealthy have power and position (wealth, in a capitalist system). They will veto a rise in THEIR taxes.

      So the less powerful (wealthy) must be taxed. Including those at the bottom end.

      So they have less and less to spend.

      Money slows yet more. And it cycles around again. A death spiral only ending when the rich bastards find out how much money is worth when you let the society that defined its worth be destroyed.

    6. Re:Why bother? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So I guess shysters plugged that loophole, eh?

      So the lottery it is. Well, at least until someone gets a bright idea how to tax that into oblivion, too.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Why bother? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      In the US at least, productivity & real wages moved steadily up in lockstep from the end of WW2 to 1970. From then on, the former has more than doubled, the latter has been flat. Somebody must be pocketing the difference.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government, to fund beer stamps and obamaphones.
      --
      udachny

  6. World's worst career by eclectro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To encourage a kid to go into a CS is a mean thing to do. Congress will continue to fall over themselves ever expanding the H1B program. Companies will love them right when they get out of college, but they will not pay above a certain salary - the same way a fast food joint doesn't. Then when they reach 40 years old they will be thrown on the human waste pile for not having "current" skills or not willing to put in 80 hour weeks with Mountain Dew and Hot Pockets. Like all the other recent college graduates are or newly arrived H1Bs. Then they'll be lucky to get a $10/hour job at a call center or target.

    If you love a kid, encourage them to become a plumber. if they want to do programming, it can be the hobby that they can do out of love for an open source project.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:World's worst career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. Programming has consistently been a high five-figure to low six-figure job, and you're sitting in an air conditioned/heated building all day.

      If by 40 and you can't make your way into management or have the talent to become a senior-level programmer leading projects, then you deserve to fail.

      Trade jobs are great in their own right, but they aren't exactly easy, either. Plumbing is a tough, dirty job, and I doubt most kids could handle it.

    2. Re:World's worst career by asasdlfgnjl · · Score: 1

      Not may of those high paying programming jobs exist, while every home/business requires a plumber. Plumbing is a five figure to six figure job.

    3. Re:World's worst career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you love a kid, encourage them to become a plumber.

      You and Barbara Hudson should speak for yourselves. I've been an SE for over 30 years and I love it.

    4. Re:World's worst career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a big divide in CS based jobs. The people that have some job security, versus those who are now competing with the H-1Bs for scraps of positions that have not bailed overseas to China, India, or other places. Sometimes you get lucky... a senior dev who knows the code and would be too expensive to replace, or that system admin who is able to keep the outfit running and the bad guys out. However, it is just like the music industry before they quit signing bands entirely. For every one success story, there are thousands of people barely making it.

      I got my CS degree. When I graduated at an accredited university, in December 2008, there was a job fair. The -only- party that had any interest in CS grads was the US Army, and they were only accepting sign-ups for enlistees, MOS 11X, and when you came out, you would get PFC as soon as you completed Basic. Of course, we all know how honest recruiters are, but I knew a good number who signed for that and raised their right hand because any work is better than no work.

    5. Re:World's worst career by ranton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not may of those high paying programming jobs exist, while every home/business requires a plumber. Plumbing is a five figure to six figure job.

      There is at least one high paying software developer job for every highly skilled software developer. That is why no one knows a highly skilled developer who they would kill to have on their team who is unemployed.

      Even in the Midwest you will hit a six digit salary by your early 30's. There is a ceiling of about $150k that very few even qualified developers will ever cross (again based on the Midwest) simply because there aren't enough Director / VP / CTO jobs to go around. But very few professions have max salaries that even reach six digits, so I really don't see what software developers have to complain about.

      Developers often compare themselves to lawyers, doctors, or investment bankers, but they don't realize there is an army of public defendants, general practitioners, and unsuccessful traders who make no more than your average software developer. The ones making $300k+ per year are likely not much more numerous than the software entrepreneurs making similar money. And the lawyers, doctors, etc. making that much money are often essentially small business owners, not simple salaried employees.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    6. Re:World's worst career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plumbing is a five figure to six figure job.

      How much did you earn as a plumber last year?

    7. Re:World's worst career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Congress will continue to fall over themselves ever expanding the H1B program

      Why aren't these traitorous bastards strung up by their balls and used as piñatas?

    8. Re:World's worst career by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      Plumbers can work fewer hours for the same pay. They also have better job security (unions and obligatory certification).. And they can't be outsourced to India or eastern Europe for 1/4 the pay.

      If your job can be off-shored by someone who thinks it will save money, you have no job security. Ask all the people laid off by Microsoft and IBM.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    9. Re:World's worst career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We the people could tell Congress to stop doing that. But that would require right-wing populists and left-wing populists to get together long enough to get something done.

    10. Re:World's worst career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For now. If you think plumbing is some magical career that won't affected by globalization and advancements in tech, think again.

    11. Re:World's worst career by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I think eventually much of it will be automated away, same as all other jobs. However, that's a future threat, whereas coding jobs are being off-shored today.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    12. Re: World's worst career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many people can become plumbers before the market becomes saturated and there's not enough work to go around?

      At least software occasionally comes up with new product categories. Plumbing will always be the same. Growth is strictly tied to population.

    13. Re:World's worst career by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

      Congress will continue to fall over themselves ever expanding the H1B program

      Why aren't these traitorous bastards strung up by their balls and used as piñatas?

      Because the ones on one side say "We gotta *get* those evil people who disagree with us! The ends justify the means!" and the ones on the other side say "We gotta *get* those evil people who disagree with us! The ends justify the means!"

      And the low-info morons treat ideologies like sports teams instead of educating themselves with some history and making choices based on principles, reason, & logic.

      How about coming together on things we can agree on? That always seems to fall by the wayside. For the vast majority, we have far more moral/ideological values and principles in common than we do differences.

      And our squabbling over teams...err...political parties and labels, along with making choices based on interests rather than principles, is precisely why things keep getting worse.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    14. Re:World's worst career by Immerman · · Score: 2

      >If by 40 and you can't make your way into management or have the talent to become a senior-level programmer leading projects, then you deserve to fail.

      Why? Why shouldn't there be a solid career path for "good enough" individuals, as there is in most fields?

      Look around your building. How many "normal" employees are there? How many managers and senior staff? 10 to 1 maybe? So, what happens to the other nine programmers after the best one gets the "higher" job? It's not like they can get a job elsewhere - every other business is in exactly the same situation. If half the working population is over 40, and fill 100% of "higher" jobs, that will only employ 20% of them. What are the other 80% supposed to do? Or more importantly, why should they enter a career path knowing there's an 80% chance they'll be thrown to the curb once their most exploitable years are behind them?

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    15. Re:World's worst career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plumbers can work fewer hours for the same pay.

      Yeah, but they deal with shit all day. And that's just the face to face part with the customer, not even counting the stuff in the toilets.

    16. Re:World's worst career by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You have the mistaken idea that all plumbers do is fix clogged toilets.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    17. Re: World's worst career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where i live the hourly rate for c++ software engineers is the same as that of the plumber. boeblingen, germany. no kidding.

    18. Re:World's worst career by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If you love a kid, encourage them to become a plumber.

      You and Barbara Hudson should speak for yourselves. I've been an SE for over 30 years and I love it.

      It's a question of averages, but of course everyone on slashdot is a special genius.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    19. Re:World's worst career by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      For now. If you think plumbing is some magical career that won't affected by globalization and advancements in tech, think again.

      Unless someone invents a Star Trek transporter, people in the US aren't going to be calling up cheaper plumbers in China to come and fix their burst water pipe.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  7. Email blast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which recently sent an email blast warning U.S. citizens they're in 'A Gigantic Global Talent War'

    Who comes up with terms like "email blast" and why are Slashdot submitters repeating them? Can we please eliminate stupid marketing terms like that at Slashdot, of all places?

    1. Re:Email blast? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      which recently sent an email blast warning U.S. citizens they're in 'A Gigantic Global Talent War'

      Who comes up with terms like "email blast" and why are Slashdot submitters repeating them? Can we please eliminate stupid marketing terms like that at Slashdot, of all places?

      ... because email spam doesn't have quite the cachet :-) And anyone who thinks they can compete with someone who costs 1/4 their pay is an ID-10-T. This whole scam is just to sell more products and services, and put downward pressure one wages.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  8. "Sagging Productivity" by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Who is making this shit up? And why is anyone believing it?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:"Sagging Productivity" by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I think it's the same source that keeps telling us that our economy is shrinking and that we have to take another pay cut to keep it afloat.

      Oddly that economy problem does not affect management bonuses negatively. Quite the opposite. But we have to pay them well and increase their bonus, you see, because they're the only thing that keeps our failing economy afloat. Let's all pray for them. Or to them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:"Sagging Productivity" by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      It's a real thing, output per employee. I guess you could remain blissfully ignorant and reject new information, or you could learn stuff.

      http://www.bls.gov/lpc/

      It's much more satisfying to be outraged at anything that confirms your ignorant cynicism, ans easier too

    3. Re:"Sagging Productivity" by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Everything shows pretty steady since the 50s, but each point is only in comparison to the previous quarter, which is the kind of thinking used to bring on these kinds of panics. It's all bullshit, and your reply non-responsive.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:"Sagging Productivity" by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      You are taking a pay cut and suffering other austerity measures and phony 'debts' to provide more currency to the financial markets that everybody calls *too big to fail*. Apparently the bailout wasn't enough.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:"Sagging Productivity" by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the bailouts did nothing to deflate the bubble. Quite contrary, it blew more hot air into the whole thing.

      And now we don't have the money anymore to cushion another burst.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re: "Sagging Productivity" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my little theory is that new york will make americans understand in the next few years the real reason hitler was voted into office.

    7. Re:"Sagging Productivity" by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      ...it blew more hot air into the whole thing.

      That's all it was supposed to do, nothing else.

      And now we don't have the money anymore to cushion another burst.

      You don't need 'money', you only need to believe to carry this on indefinitely. The bailout doesn't even cover a half a percent of the derivatives market. The system is truly faith driven. 'Confidence', a good name for this game.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  9. Sold! by timm0 · · Score: 1

    Usually Brookings releases sensible, independent analyses based on facts. Anyone familiar with the business practices of microsquid knows what's happened here.

    1. Re:Sold! by careysub · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Brookings analyses have increasingly been up for sale. Not surprisingly it is taking up this pro-Microsoft, pro-Gates agenda after the Bill's foundation became their biggest contributor.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  10. Talent of what exactly? by AqD · · Score: 2

    Yes I know they're good at math and CS scores and more willing to accept longer work hours and less payment, but what else? There is no world-class software company or any organization of the field in China or India, except the Chinese cyber army maybe. And so far they haven't made anything significant yet, commercial or open-sourced.

    What kind of talent are they looking for exactly? How many of those H-1Bs could possibly be helpful in key areas such as Microsoft Research, the kind of place which actually needs talents to run? Or they're just looking for cheap programmers to write stupid facebook games?

    1. Re: Talent of what exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bingo one million times. the indians are intellectually myopic, but surely they will eat the lunch of the germanics* if those do not protect it.

      * the idiot nations west of urals to l.a.

  11. Slashdot Religion by Sevalecan · · Score: 1

    I'm starting to feel like Slashdot is a religious website pushing for converts, what with all the posts about needing more women in engineering and CS and also saying that elementary and high schools need to focus more on programming. I guess that would classify this as a universalizing religion.

    In my experience, even people who choose engineering and the like as a career path often aren't that intelligent. Schooling doesn't necessarily make you a good programmer or anything else. One might consider that a lack of talent, and perhaps it is. Maybe what they need to become truly great in these areas can be taught, but adding CS programs to schools isn't going to help that, and I think you'll find a general lack of interest and incompetence.

    1. Re:Slashdot Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm starting to feel like Slashdot is a religious website pushing for converts, what with all the posts about needing more women in engineering and CS and also saying that elementary and high schools need to focus more on programming. I guess that would classify this as a universalizing religion.

      In my experience, even people who choose engineering and the like as a career path often aren't that intelligent. Schooling doesn't necessarily make you a good programmer or anything else. One might consider that a lack of talent, and perhaps it is. Maybe what they need to become truly great in these areas can be taught, but adding CS programs to schools isn't going to help that, and I think you'll find a general lack of interest and incompetence.

      Blasphemer! Shun the unbeliever! Shun him!

    2. Re:Slashdot Religion by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      You make a good point. Most of what I see here now is indistinguishable from a cult, and any contrary opinions are rapidly shouted, er, modded down.

    3. Re: Slashdot Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey boy, i always read the downmodded stuff because that is where the gems can be found between specks of shit.

      also. i get downmodded for calling out the marxists of the media and their bankster friends.

  12. Yeah, it's our CS education by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    I'm going to go way out on a limb here and suggest that the endemic problems with the US educational system extend somewhat broader and deeper than "we don't teach kindergartners to code".

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Yeah, it's our CS education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct. Watch this video and find out exactly what is wrong with education in America, and note that Common Core is merely an amplification of this Orwellian "education" dystopia.

      I should note that Gates also backs Common Core, with the aim to put more computers (with MS Windows on them) into class rooms. Ask yourself, what would a school need if they were going to each coding? Perhaps more computers?

      Always follow the money.

    2. Re:Yeah, it's our CS education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeesh. You're going to have to do better than that Constitution Party crap.

      The most amusing thing about conspiracy nuts is their obliviousness to why people don't instantly swallow their ravings.

  13. Simple explaination: we're tired by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

    ...output per worker fell by 1.9 percent during the first quarter of 2015.

    Because the current/remaining employees are being ridden hard and put away wet. Employers are squeezing what they have, instead of hiring, to be "competitive" - even though profits are up and shareholders are happy. Or it could be because of things like this: Georgia Businessman Refuses to Hire Until Obama Is Fired (there are others):

    Bill Looman, owner of U.S. Cranes LLC, said he is fed up with the bad economy and D.C. politicians who do nothing to solve the problem. So until there is a change of leadership, his company trucks will bear the message: “New Company Policy: We Are Not Hiring Until Obama Is Gone.”

    Or that that the top priority of Mitch McConnell and the GOP was/is to make Obama a one-term president (which didn't go so well) and prevent any successes for the President or the Democrats - instead of actually working to fix the Economy. (Yes, the Dems are a problem too, but mainly because they're inept, not actively evil, hostile and uncaring toward those who are not rich, old, white and male - like the Republicans.)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  14. Talent War? It's Class War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Computer Science Programs aren't the cure for much of anything -- so stop trying to make them out to be. By doing so, you are DOING ACTUAL HARM to our already broken education system and to the students who will be subjected to these asinine policies.

    You want to know what ails US productivity? Being raised by over-protective parents who are scared to death of being thrown in jail if they so much as let their children walk to school unattended, much less play outside on their own, who are given rewards and told how special they are for just showing up at the soccer match, are told to be busy little worker bees at school, to get good grades if they want to have a career, who then go to college, put themselves deep in debt to pay for that education and find that that MBA that they thought would make them just like Gordon Gekko and wealthy beyond belief has netted them a job as a "Sales Representative" at Comcast.

    And after all that, they watch as the costs of rent and groceries keeps going up year after year. And that they are struggling to survive in a society that treats it's unemployed and homeless as pariahs. A society where the Local Governments are creating more and more Municipal Infractions with higher and higher fines to charge them with and even sending people to jail over non-payment of debts and/or subjecting them to predatory "payment programs" via private companies who manage to turn a $100 fine into a $1000 profit. A society where their very employers are charging higher and higher prices for goods and services locally, while they practically give away their products "emerging markets" all in the name of globalization -- while laying off their co-workers and either off-shoring operations or importing H1-B workers who live in a corporate squat house. A society where Martha Stewart is thrown in Camp Cupcake for acting on a stock tip given by a friend over dinner -- but where the DoJ chooses not to prosecute practically the entirety of Congress for Insider Trading for acting on the litany of illegal stock tips given by Lobbyists on a daily basis -- where that same Congress then passes a law legalizing Insider trading for them and them alone

    And then it really sets in -- everything really hits home. They finally get a crystal clear understanding of what the term "wage slave" means. And that yes -- they are indeed a slave and it's no laughing matter or petty issue. Because you find you are an actual fucking slave. Tied down by shackles made of debt, credit ratings and the need to get by in a society that does not take care of it's own, were they are not equal under law, where the law is against them while giving a complete pass on the crimes of the wealthy and where it's "I got mine, go get yours you lazy slob" while the Corporations and Government work hand in hand to squeeze every last bit of money from the lower classes until there is nothing left but the ultra-wealthy and "the scum"

    And that's where this Think Tank supports -- cracking the whip -- telling scary stories, making it us against them -- all in an effort to get kids to work harder, to give more, do more and to do it all for less.

    So can you blame the current work force for languishing? For not giving a shit if the company that employs them is as successful as your Board and Shareholders wants it to be? And if this "Think Tank" gets it's way -- who will they blame when this next generation, not content to merely languish in apathy chooses to rise up and seek the blood of their oppressors? Because that is exactly where things are going. Because that is where society has always gone under similar conditions. Because that's where things always go when the greedy short sighted fucks finally take things too far

    1. Re:Talent War? It's Class War by plopez · · Score: 1

      Yes. And basically they are creating a crisis to profit from it.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:Talent War? It's Class War by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The only way to cure that would be a revolution, but that would be totally contrary to America's fundamental values.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Talent War? It's Class War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want to know what ails US productivity? Being raised by over-protective parents...

      I'm not following your logic. You assert that the problem is over protective parents but then most of your post is about the horrors of excessive income inequality.

      Now, the causation could go the other way: overprotective parents are a symptom rather than the disease. Asia is a huge place with a lot of diversity but much of Asia has massive economic inequality. In those parts of Asia, for every rich person living a secure comfortable life there are a hundred poor people living harsh brutal lives struggling to survive just one more day. In such an environment, there's a sense that one step off the straight an narrow will lead to ruin: if a child doesn't get a perfect score on their grade school math test they will be trapped in desperate poverty for the rest of their life.

      But that's not the case everywhere in the world. In some parts of the world, most people have secure comfortable lives. Sure, it's not impossible to mess up your life if you really try but pretty much everyone who's willing to work an honest nine-to-five has a nice life. In those countries, life is a positive sum game where most people are winners - as opposed to large parts of Asia where life is a negative sum game with a hundred losers for every winner.

      Now, I know Slashdot isn't going to like the real answer. But the truth is that Scandinavian style socialism works - low corruption and high levels of economic redistribution in the form of pervasive social services. It's not just random chance that the Scandinavian countries are consistently the happiest in the world. Oh, and Scandinavian countries have some of the strictest laws in the world against physical punishment (e.g. spanking) of children.

      TLDR; it's not about over protective parents, it's about good government.

  15. Smoke and mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is NO shortage of technology talent in the United States. The lies propagated by prominent technology companies like Microsoft and Facebook are so they can fire more older workers and hire immigrants at bottom basement wages to replace them.

    As for productivity declining, maybe that is because the economy is better now so that workers don't feel so compelled to work their asses off just to try to save their jobs. Also, productivity has increased substantially over the past decade or two, whereas wages have stagnated or even declined for the middle class. Something has got to give.

    Don't believe these jerks from Microsoft and Facebook. They are just trying to kill off more jobs for older workers in order to give those jobs to immigrant workers.

    1. Re:Smoke and mirrors by plopez · · Score: 1

      Why do you hate Capitalism? Why do you hate Freedom? Why do you have children. Think of the children!

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:Smoke and mirrors by plopez · · Score: 1

      ummm why do you *hate* children. I screwed that up.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re:Smoke and mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like it better the first way. :)

  16. Re:"Sagging Productivity" Explained by drcesteffen · · Score: 2

    At the beginning of every downturn in the economy, the companies make do with fewer employees by either not filling open positions or by laying people off. So the productivity goes higher since measurable-output/employee = productivity and measurable-output takes awhile to be impacted by the loss of the employees. We say that changes to the measurable-output lag behind changes in the number of employees. This is partially because other employees, who know their current job well, put in extra effort to do the job of the missing employees. Eventually, the employees doing 2 jobs reach burn out or find another job and leave the company. At that point, the measurable-output drops dramatically resulting in a corresponding drop in productivity. The company then hires two people to replace the employee they lost who was doing the two jobs resulting another large drop in productivity. I am not an economist, but I don't think productivity is a very useful indicator.

    Productivity may also drop when you hire two new college graduates or two H1B visa employees instead of one older experienced programmer.

  17. Yeah, right. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    The idea that everyone needs to be able to write code is nonsense. This is just propaganda to support the "need" for more visas.

    It's a CRISIS, I tell you! But fortunately we can spend the next 20 years importing labor for the jobs we can't export, while you fix the school system and kids work their way through it.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  18. Re:"Sagging Productivity" Explained by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Also, since productivity is measured by $$ produced per hour worked, the huge drop in gas prices means that even if the total produced were to stay the same, "productivity" drops.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  19. Or, you could try paying them by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    These stupid bastards. They think the most productive workforce in the world has suddenly lost productivity because of some educational deficit.

    I wonder if it even occurred to them that maybe just paying people a reasonable wage might make a difference instead of putting all your focus on your C-class executives' compensation.

    Who doesn't realize that eventually, growing income inequality is going to eventually result in lower productivity? And that deteriorating lifestyles are not good for business even when they're good for your bottom line?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Or, you could try paying them by plopez · · Score: 1

      There's trouble! Trouble I tell you:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  20. You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this is just one symptom of a major problem with our educational system in general and that it's this idea we need to cram all this irrelevant stuff into children's heads that they either don't care about or could care less. Why does everyone need to code? I'm not saying they shouldn't, I'm saying why waste time trying to teach CS, or for that matter, anything else to a kid who doesn't show any interest in the subject? Maybe the kid doesn't show interest at the time the curriculum says they should, or maybe the kid doesn't care so much about computers.

    Electricity is everywhere, but you don't see schools making "electrician education" part of the K-12 education curriculum. And why should they?

    Ever notice one thing K-12 never teaches is that there is knowledge that can be learned outside school? Listening to educators you'd think that they were the only source of knowledge on earth, and yet learning outside of school has always been possible. Especially today with the internet, and Wikipedia, and YouTube, but also the public library, friends, family, tutors, other people. Yes it means you have to have a working bullshit filter, but frankly you have to have a bullshit filter anyway in public school. Yes it takes effort, but it's worth it. Growing up should not be sitting quietly and passively accepting what is given to you, but more of an exploration with guidance from parents and teachers.

    I bet schools could cut back on their budgets quite a bit too if they stop spending so much on things for kids who don't care, and budgeted for kids who do.

    1. Re:You know... by plopez · · Score: 1

      God save us from 'Educational Reform'.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  21. Pretty sure this has been tried before. by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    I was installing security systems at the time, and we serviced all of the local schools. I was there during the purge of Apple from the school system. Rooms just for the storage of out going Apple equipment (computers, printers, other peripherals) lots of rooms. Every school was the same.

    Some schools were giving a single Win95 and a modem a try (not a router) to get outside access and having a heck of a go of it. Running a 6 line BBS I could of been of some use, but regulations prevented it. - interesting time.

    1. Re:Pretty sure this has been tried before. by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      Yep, when I was in elementary/middle school (late '80s / early '90s), there were Apple ][s everywhere. There was a big "computers in schools" push, grant money made it nearly free for a school to get them, so they all had them. I am not sure how effective it was at "improving productivity of the workforce" though.

  22. Money can buy PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    slashdot is merely reporting what the media is discussing.

    The tech companies want to increase the number of h1-bs. So, the big tech companies have been pushing (paying) a media narrative, that the product of American k-12 schooling is inferior, and that America needs to import talent from overseas. Sort of like how Microsoft has been pushing that Google is evil, and anticompetitive, and Saudi Arabia is pushing that the Syrian rebels want a secular democracy (ha ha).

  23. Sagging productivity? by plopez · · Score: 1

    The US is the most productive economy in the world. I say we don't worry about it yet and instead use some of that productivity for critical utilities, such as health care, and liesure.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:Sagging productivity? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      The US is the most productive economy in the world. I say we don't worry about it yet and instead use some of that productivity for critical utilities, such as health care, and liesure.

      Lie? Sure.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  24. the guy who brought us windows and office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    shouldn't be allowed within a 100 miles of education or healthcare

    1. Re: the guy who brought us windows and office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the guy who brought us commoditized computing and ubiquitous productivity tools maybe ought be the ONLY fucking guy...

    2. Re: the guy who brought us windows and office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Bill Gates owes the world billions of dollars for the productivity LOST due to MS crappy software.

      Now, instead of doing actual work, we can waste hours per day screwing with email configurations and getting printers to work!

      Hell, we have whole IT departments to sink costs into because you can't just plug the shit in and use it!

  25. Different IT Skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I work in IT and am highly sought after. Have been for many years. Same with lots of people that I know. Recruiters are pulling them out of college with incredible offers.

    The difference is a specialization in Linux, website management, and database administration (LAMP, Hadoop, Cpanel, PostGre, etc.).

    Windows admins are a dime per dozen and they know it. Someone moved their cheese and they are failing to adapt.

    Unfortunately, Windows skills are what all of the teachers are pushing. It is time for the high schools, colleges, and universities to teach skills that are relevant and sought after by employers.

  26. Starting ever earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sick of Microsoft, Facebook, and other companies pushing our youth in order to feed their profits!

  27. Also, kill the DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we need to decriminalize innovation before we can ever get our productivity back.

    If youre in america, youre not allowed to backward-engineer other peoples tech.... like is happening EVERYWHERE ELSE IN THE WORLD.

  28. What we need is a perspective by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    What good does it do when US schools crank out IT experts when the outlook is being not hired / replaced by cheap labor from overseas? I also don't think that high schools should focus on coding skills or such. Rather have students master writing and science skills, then drop tuition for all STEM degrees nationwide. Any shortage of talent will be gone within a matter of years. At the same time tech companies should not all focus on just a few areas in the US like Silicon Valley, Seattle, or San Diego. There are gazillion other places where talent is available and competition for that talent is tremendously lower making skilled workers less expensive to hire and easier to retain.

  29. Wrong place to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you really want to dick with the education system, you might want to consider training people in the field most likely to impact them: economics.

    For a country who swears by capitalism as the solution to everything, we don't know much of anything about economics or business. It's more of a voodoo religion than a skill or god forbid, science.

  30. Re: "Sagging Productivity" Explained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bingo. beancounting bullshit everywhere. they now call it metrics.

  31. What do you expect from a techno Thug like Gates? by unclefred · · Score: 1

    Whats surprising about the Gates inspired "Think Tank: K-12 CS Education Cure For Sagging US Productivity"? The guy was a techno thug in his previous incarnation as head of Microsoft where under his leadership the windows OS was preloaded onto Pcs and shoved down the throats of all and sundry creating a monopoly that raked in millions over a many years aided by complicit regulators who didn't have the guts to stare down the Microsoft behemoth when they had a chance to correct the situation when they finally called Microsoft to account for their monopolistic behavior.and abuse of power. Then Gates 2.O The second coming of Saint Bill and Melinda the foundation years or Techno thug wants to be loved. Now using the money gained form his old Microsoft Techno thug bully boy days of taking over companies he wants to be known as saint Bill the good guy helping the world become a better place by feeding our young into his CS Education machine to keep the good times rolling but for who? Once a techno thug always a techno thug!

  32. Sagging Tits by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

    The only thing sagging are my 90 y/o grandmother's tits. We're working harder, longer and producing more per hour than any time in history (giggity)

  33. Actually it's about Free Trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say this as someone who had done well because of free trade, but all the countries I travel to for (globalized) business certainly DO NOT have free trade like practiced in US trade policies: they create advantage for themselves to protect what they have to create jobs and industry. The US has allowed its manufacturing, technology and jobs to ebb out of the US for a few pennies more profit. Because there are no prospects for jobs, fairly few people are willing to take the gamble of the hard work required to get into tech for the fleeting chance they may or may not have a job in the end. Simple risk analysis. Simple economics. You still see some techies get into it because they love it and would do it anyway. They don't calculate risk or economic gain the same way as most people.

  34. Serendipitous by mofotopia · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the story. Very useful for me right now, serendipitous, so to speak. #ftw