Slashdot Mirror


Psychologist: Porn and Video Game Addiction Are Leading To 'Masculinity Crisis'

HughPickens.com writes: Philip Zimbardo is a prominent psychologist from Stanford, most notable for leading the notorious Stanford prison experiment. He has published new research findings based on the lives of 20,000 young men, and his conclusion is stark: there is a developing "masculinity crisis" caused by addiction to video games and pornography. "Our focus is on young men who play video games to excess, and do it in social isolation — they are alone in their room," says Zimbardo. "It begins to change brain function. It begins to change the reward center of the brain, and produces a kind of excitement and addiction. What I'm saying is — boys' brains are becoming digitally rewired."

As an example, Zimbardo uses this quote from one young man: "When I'm in class, I'll wish I was playing World of Warcraft. When I'm with a girl, I'll wish I was watching pornography, because I'll never get rejected." Zimbardo doesn't think there's a specific time threshold at which playing video games goes from being acceptable to excessive. He says it varies by individual, and is more based on a "psychological change in mindset." To fight the problem, he suggest families need to track how much time is being spent on video games compared to other activities. "He also called for better sex education in schools — which should focus not only on biology and safety, but also on emotions, physical contact and romantic relationships."

69 of 950 comments (clear)

  1. nature will breed it out by alen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    being that many of them won't pass on their genes, nature will take care of it

    1. Re:nature will breed it out by Adriax · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You read a couple thousand hours playing a single game.
      She reads "easily entertained and focuses on a single repetitive activity. Just have to stock up on learning games and mommy can have lots of Me time."

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    2. Re:nature will breed it out by Jax+Omen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Idk, my girlfriend of five years just spend all weekend (approx 30 hours of game time) playing Path of Exile with me, in the new 1 month challenge league.

      She's been having me teach her things so she can improve in League of Legends, and wants to get as good as I am so we can duoqueue together in ranked.

      There definitely are girls out there who are looking for nerds/gamers. The problem is most of them are subjected to so many supercreepy "oh there's a girl in voice chat in this raid I'm going to queue my mic and begin masturbating" and "white knight everything she says or does and follow her around like a puppy dog" type "gamer guys" that they're terrified of going anywhere near the rest of us nerds.

      I got lucky and found a girl who had been sheltered from online gaming, she had only played Nintendo games prior to meeting me.

      If nerds/gamers want to find women who won't reject them, they need to stop being awful people to every girl playing games first. Once gamer girls feel safe actually admitting to being girls in games online, gamer guys won't be rejected en masse by them anymore.

    3. Re:nature will breed it out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They also won't address the other aspect of this - our society puts no value on men. Neither do most young women, especially these days.

      Young men don't want to be walking wallets for greedy self-indulgent shrews to bilk. But that's increasingly what the modern woman foists offers them. We have a culture that's put women's desire for higher and higher status males into overdrive. We over-validate and over-reward women massively, and constantly shame and criticise young men just for being men. Education is entirely centred around girls and the workplace overtly discriminates against men - all based on nonsense claims that women are somehow oppressed.

      Young men have no expectations of being treated fairly, either in their personal life or at work. So they retreat into things they do enjoy.

    4. Re:nature will breed it out by itzly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The subtopic of the GP post was about nature breeding it out. It doesn't matter if the article mentions hereditary traits, it's still a correct observation. Some men are much more interested in games and porn than others.

    5. Re:nature will breed it out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No one should be surprised.

      Millennial males have looked. They examined and considered the state of today's courtship, relationships, pertinent legal conditions/rulings/precedent, cost-effort, culture - even WITHOUT including the femmifrenzy of the last year or two...

      ...and no one should be surprised they said "Screw that noise."

      The female experience will overlap on some of the second paragraph's points, so some decrease of interest on the other side would also be unsurprising.

      Pr0n 'n gaemz are a symptom of the bullshit. They aren't a perfectly matching peg, but apparently the substitution is adequate.

    6. Re:nature will breed it out by narcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You sound addicted to video games and porn.

    7. Re:nature will breed it out by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Young men don't want to be walking wallets for greedy self-indulgent shrews to bilk. But that's increasingly what the modern woman foists offers them. We have a culture that's put women's desire for higher and higher status males into overdrive. We over-validate and over-reward women massively, and constantly shame and criticise young men just for being men. Education is entirely centred around girls and the workplace overtly discriminates against men - all based on nonsense claims that women are somehow oppressed.

      What is needed, is to teach young men, how to get into the mindset of women, what they need to say, and how to 'project' themselves so they can get laid more.

      Young men need to be taught it is a numbers game, Don't get hung up on one chick. When out, dress decently, be clean, and above all else, project confidence in yourself. You don't have to be that confident, just look at act that way. Act like you really don't give a shit if she wants you or not...be a bit aloof.

      They always want what is a bit tough for them to have. Take control of the situation, decide where you're going. Nothing wrong with being polite, opening doors, etc....but take charge.

      When you do approach and start talking, just learn some simple tricks...get THEM to talk about themselves, about their family...what they want and what they do. That way you don't have to really do that much for the conversation. And trust me, NO woman ever left a date complaining that she talked too much about herself.

      Simple steps like that are what makes it easy to get into her pants. And don't just target ONE girl. There are tons of them out there. Rejection can and WILL happen, but shrug it off and start to hit on her friend...hahaha. But seriously, just hit on as many as possible. And meet and approach women whenever and wherever you can. Outside of the bar scene is really choice. Simple as asking for the time, just approach, approach, approach.

      And if you're shy, and everyone starts out that way. Just walk up to women during the day, ask for the time...just think of it as practice....just talk to them. It doesn't even have to be one you want for anything, just practice.

      It isn't that hard, especially if you get over that feeling of "oh no, if she rejects me, I'll not know what to do the rest of my life.". Get a new mindset, hit on one you like, if it sticks have fun with it....if not, water off your back, she didn't matter...who's next?

      I'm not saying be an ass...but don't be the overly willing to please guy that will do anything for her and lets her call the shots. If you do that, you may as well be her gay friend, 'cause she's not going to sleep with you. Women like a challenge....be a bit of a challenge.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:nature will breed it out by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3, Insightful

      being that many of them won't pass on their genes, nature will take care of it

      Unless of course this is horseshit. Video games aren't new, porn definitely isn't new. Both have been around and easy enough to get for your average middle aged man that we would have already witnessed this social breakdown. Yet our genes carry forth, my children's schools are over capacity and building out. The desire to play video games or look at porn as an alternative to genuine social interaction has *always* been there. At the same time, most of us realize it's synthetic, the potato chip of the interaction (not to mention sexual) world. If anything video games and the internet are recreating the social isolation that used to be far more common when there were few people scattered farther from each other, and the best choice you had was writing a letter. As far as I'm concerned, being able to retreat into our heads more is a positive step forward, allowing us to defeat the lock-step committee approach to thinking we have depended on more heavily in the past 50 years, and allowing individualism a chance to reign again.

      There is only the perception that these things are new, and that perception is useful to get funding.

    9. Re:nature will breed it out by AnontheDestroyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, they will not adjust their standards, which are set by societal norms and unlikely to shift. The half with a low libido will just stop screwing around altogether, and the half with a strong libido will all go to the same fewer dudes over and over again.

    10. Re:nature will breed it out by Daetrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's "funny". Almost all guys who try to hit on girls get rejected, either right off the bat or after a brief period of dating when things don't work out. This happens especially often when people are first starting out and don't have a lot of experience. (Yes, there are the exceptions who spend their entire lives happily married to their first high school sweetheart, but they are very rare.) And yet not all of them end up deciding that women in general are horrible.

      Some guys get rejected and blame it on fate or chance or some other random factor and try again. In essence they accept that some people just aren't right for each other.

      And some guys get rejected and blame it on themselves, then they either mope for awhile, or try to improve themselves, then try again. (This is the category i fall into, it's probably not as healthy as the first option, but it seems far preferable to...)

      But some of them get rejected and blame the women. Maybe they were unlucky and were hitting on/involved with a bad apple, or maybe they're just projecting the personal problems in their own life on others. I don't know. I'm also not sure if they actually give up at that point, or continue on in the "sure knowledge" that the women they're hitting on are actually horrible feminazi golddiggers. Because hey, having sex with a horrible feminazi goldigger is still better than masturbation, right? (Reality not usually being black and white, it's probably a bit of both.)

      (And of course these aren't strict categories. Individuals may have have a tendency towards one of the categories but have a different response in a particular situation, or drift into another category over time. The switch from "blaming oneself" to "blaming the womens" seems to be a particularly popular one unfortunately.)

      I can say as a male that i've never felt under-valued or discriminated against, either in society or in the workplace. And certainly not every individual woman has valued me as much as i would like her to, but then there have also been at least one or two who valued me more than i really wanted them to. And despite the mismatches i have persevered and have had what i consider to be a reasonable number of relationships in my life, a couple short-term but mostly long-term.

      All of the women i've dated have been feminists to a greater or lesser degree. They've also all been generally good people (one or two of them were more interested in quick lay and then moving on to another conquest than anything long term, which made me a bit sad at the time, but that doesn't make them bad people.) None of them seemed to disrespect me or under-value me, and none of them were looking for a "walking wallet" to bilk. Obviously most of the relationships didn't work out in the long run, but it was never because they wanted more money or that they didn't respect me.

      Most of the women i know as friends or coworkers also seem like equally good people. I've never actually encountered anyone who was clearly looking for a "walking wallet", but perhaps as someone making slightly above the average middle-class income who doesn't tend to flash what money i do have i'm just not attracting the attention of such people. I've certainly heard of some specific women who may fit that bill, but they seem relatively rare. Likewise "feminazis" who actually hate men seem to be a lot rarer on the ground than the critics of feminism would have you believe.

      So the common thread i see is that men who see difficulties in dating as being due to chance or their own personal failings generally end up finding a woman who's worth being with, possibly after a number of false starts, but eventually. While men who blame women for the problems they encounter only seem able to attract women who want something other than a positive emotional relationship.

      The women i know, the ones who in my experience seem like decent human being and seem to make up the majority of the female population, usually seem to be pretty good at sensing when a g

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    11. Re:nature will breed it out by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is needed, is to teach young men, how to get into the mindset of women, what they need to say, and how to 'project' themselves so they can get laid more.

      e.g. as a male, you have no right to any expression of yourself as you are. Your intended function is purely to be what others want you to be, even if that means a hellish life of total self-abnegation.

    12. Re:nature will breed it out by PPalmgren · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There comes a point where this get old. I went through my phase in my late teens with this, and realized I hated being in any kind of relationship like that. I don't find enjoyment in getting laid if there's no emotion in it.

      The games take everything I value out of a relationship, so I decided I'm unwilling to play them. Regrettably, this means my relationships are fewer, but the one that recently ended was more meaningful to me than the previous five combined.

    13. Re:nature will breed it out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What men are seeing now is how it feels to be the under-served

      The undertone being "turnabout is fair play", right? First of all, that women have been suppressed for most of recorded human history would not justify doing the same to men, if that were the case. The boys you're turning the tables on had nothing to do with that. That said, I don't think it's a matter of "feeling under-served", not liking their "new role". It looks more like they don't want to try and fill an impossible mixture of roles ("provider for the feminist wife") and particularly aren't attracted to women who (seem to) demand this role mix of them. And these women are getting pickier: Women traditionally seek "upward" relationships. Independent, educated women, even though they're self-sufficient and don't need a provider, don't go for men who couldn't provide for their upscale desires.

      Secondly, what you're seeing isn't defiance. These young men don't secretly want relationships, but withhold themselves to make a point or to coerce women into renouncing feminism. No, it's at best indifference, if not outright rejection. They literally don't want girlfriends. In their mind, a relationship "costs" more than it's worth. It's not just the cost side either: Consider that they see divorces not just as statistics but as live examples in their daily experience of what to expect from a relationship.

      And finally, that is not great for your daughters. Men are growing particularly wary of women in their mid to late thirties. They seem to have exceptionally bad luck with contraceptives and get pregnant just by looking at babies. In generations past, few women that age were single anymore. But today, young women want to have their own careers first. By the time they decide to have kids after all, they are in a bit of a rush to find Mr. Right. Now consider a dating pool where an increasing number of men simply don't want a relationship, especially not with a woman who wants kids, quickly. But the clock is ticking so someone has to be it, and almost inevitably, given her status and expectations, she "settles". This has failed marriage with kids written all over it, and even though women usually have the upper hand in that situation, it's not really something you can want for your daughters. And who would blame men for not wanting any part of that.

    14. Re:nature will breed it out by x0ra · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm more and more starting to think that women have been suppressed for a very valid reason; their eagerness to feed on men is limitless.

    15. Re:nature will breed it out by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Until then men are going to be eating the shit sandwich we've been serving for quite a while.

      Why must I pay for the sins of my ancestors?

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  2. Feminist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Claiming normal male behaviour is a disease.

    1. Re:Feminist bullshit by slashmydots · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The golden rule: If you are attracted to an attractive woman's body, you are a pervert and a pig.
      Golden rule part B: if you are not attracted to an unattractive woman's body, you're a shallow pig.

    2. Re:Feminist bullshit by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Claiming normal male behaviour is a disease.

      Da fuq?

      How did *that* get modded insightful. Being completely addicted to anything, no matter how harmless in moderation (games, porn, alcohol, other drugs) etc is generally considered to be a bad thing.

      It's certainly not "normal male behaviour".

      I think the only reason this post got modded informative is because anything that takes a dig at feminists on slashdot gets modded up no matter how batshit crazy.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:Feminist bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Zimbardo isn't a feminist, and I wouldn't put my money on him being taken in by feminist propaganda.

      However, I think his study is missing some significant elements. He is too quick to postulate the cause-and-effect relationship. Other psychologists have shown that overcrowding also causes voluntary social isolation. Bullying and other such environmental factors also drive people to prefer solitary entertainment. I think the addiction to video games is as much an effect as it is a cause in a whole cluster of social events.

      I will point out that a common belief among men in America, be it true or false, is that women:

      1) are very demanding in romantic relationships.
      2) are not very giving in romantic relationships.
      3) are fickle and will leave you as soon as they get bored (with no concern over how much of an emotional attachment you have to them).
      4) are not interested in much of anything that men find engaging, and won't join men in men's lives so much as pull men out into the woman's lives.

      Maybe this is different for millennials or younger. I don't know. But I do know plenty of geeks who feel this way about women and all have stories to back it up. They don't even bother trying to seek romance because they see it as an uphill battle with no prize at the end. The games and porn are an easy way to fill the time instead.

    4. Re:Feminist bullshit by TheDarkener · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, the golden rule is, 'Treat others the way you would want to be treated yourself'.

      Think about that in context.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    5. Re:Feminist bullshit by Yunzil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The golden rule: If you are attracted to an attractive woman's body, you are a pervert and a pig.

      Uh, no. If you are attracted to an attractive woman's body, and then you make an ass of yourself over it, whistling at her, making crude remarks to your friends, or making unwanted physical advances, then you are a pervert and a pig.

      It's really not complicated.

    6. Re:Feminist bullshit by Bengie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Help your GF get off to?

    7. Re:Feminist bullshit by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Of do shut up, the pair of you.

      This is clearly damaging behaviour. Like many addictions it screws up your life. It's not normal or healthy to be that obsessed with something. Most guys don't think about porn when they are with their girlfriends. Most people don't spend thousands of hours on a game, to the detriment of the rest of their lives.

      This masculinist bullshit where everything men do must automatically be fine and dandy is stopping people who need help from getting it. It's as bad as the people who promote anorexia as being a good thing. Maybe you just really hate feminists and see conspiracies everywhere, or maybe you are just trying to justify your own self destructive behaviour, but either way it's wrong.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Feminist bullshit by goose-incarnated · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe you just really hate feminists and see conspiracies everywhere, or maybe you are just trying to justify your own self destructive behaviour, but either way it's wrong.

      Or maybe it's just a standard human response to the environment? Just about any organism would retreat from a toxic environment, why would young men be any different? Society tells them in no uncertain terms that they get less rights in relationships, less reproductive options and once they reproduce they are merely to be used for income. Why the hell would they now want to go ahead and have what *you* and the rest of the attackers call "normal"?

      They are getting pleasure from something that harms no one, except for that one little fact that society can no longer use them. As long as they continue getting more pleasure from porn than from real women I see no problem here. when they want real women they will go out and find them, and if they find the demands too great then they will retreat back into their porn/VG world.

      The only losers are the women, who will now have to share the few men that *are* available. Like I pointed in a post to *you* many months ago, treating men badly simply to further what you think women want only results in the women who are the losers. Maybe you should suggest a mens-only school, or special bursaries for men only to make more men available for relationships? After all, you suggested similar for women multiple times on this forum.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    9. Re:Feminist bullshit by citylivin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "This is clearly damaging behaviour."

      Bullshit. I spent my 20s playing video games after work every day and weekend, watched tonnes of porn, same as the people in this article. My 30s are full of children and well adjusted family life. Its like anything, some people grow out of it, and some let it take over their lives.

      You should say, TO SOME PEOPLE this is clearly damaging behaviour. I would submit that those are the same people that would easily find something else to damage themselves with if not for porn and video games.

      In summary, its just a bunch of hot air. In past ages these young men would go to war, join a cult, or bury themselves in their work.
      Obviously you want your kids to have limits on their computer time, but once they are in their 20s they are enough of an adult to realize what they want, make their own decisions. Drinking, drugs and video games is as good of a way to spend your life as any other when you have no real obligations.

      Society doesn't really make many productive things for young men to do in the evenings. The two I can think of that are the most popular when i was a 20 something were waste money on clubs/bars or exercise. You cant exercise more than a few hours a day, and most 20 something are dead broke because of all the income inequality in our lovely world. A 20 year old with no family has very few time sinks. What is the alternative? what should these kids be doing? buying $7 beers at the club trying to impress whores? Volunteering at a church? get real! Video games are cheap, porn is free. That's why they are successful and people are into them as hobbies. Not because peoples brains are changing or some such bullshit. Im pretty sure guys always liked playing games and naked ladies.

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    10. Re:Feminist bullshit by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry but it's not that simple. Men's behavior is an adaptation to changes in social structure. In the past, rejection was about the only thing a guy had to face. Today, it's fraudulent, career destroying sexual abuse/rape charges, financial ruin from extremist 'family' court judges in divorce, and, really, indifference from the now hyper gynocentric/effeminate culture. Hell, even coming on to a woman in what most would consider appropriate circumstances (at a bar/club lets say) carries a real risk of being carted off to jail because she 'felt uncomfortable'. A lot of guys are doing the math and realizing the dwindling rewards of pursuing women no longer offset the increasing risks. These threats are not simply anxiety that can be willed away. They are very real and increasing with every socjus type law that is passed.

      The bottom line is that feminism removed almost all the incentives for men to marry and commit, leaving only the responsibilities for cleaning up any 'mess' that might occur for choosing to interact with women at any level, from casual/professional interaction to sex/marriage (why did she choose to have the baby? because she knew she could get the state to bilk it out of him). You can thank affirmative action for that. Women are now a privileged caste, and in caste societies, the lowers often avoided interaction with the uppers just to minimize the probability of trouble. Thus, the only guys left at the table are the desperate sorts who will take any beating for any sort of female attention, even if negative, and the player sorts you mentioned. The whole situation is degenerate.

  3. Lieberman 2.0 by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've read a lot of stories lately about VG and porn doing this and that to our youth. Which game will be blamed for the next school shooting?

    I've been saying forever that the keyword is moderation. Anything in excess will screw you up, be it porn, exercise, or board games.

  4. What a load of utter shite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This research is a load of unmitigated bollocks.

    The real problem is that society, "social justice warriors", schools and so on are making being male a kind-of pathology, expecting boys to behave like girls. No wonder so many of them prefer to sit in their bedrooms playing video games and watching porn.

    1. Re:What a load of utter shite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Boys behaving like boys is a "problem", apparently.

    2. Re:What a load of utter shite. by ZankerH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why should there be an expectation for the two to behave the same?

    3. Re:What a load of utter shite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is treating women with respect and not like fuck toys acting less masculine? Sounds like your ideas were screwed up BEFORE you played video games.

    4. Re:What a load of utter shite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think that's what he said. I reread it several times and still didn't see that. So I'll tell you what is considered a problem since you want to engage in argumentum ad absurdum.

      Boys hit things. Boys fight and get back up and are friends again. Boys throw things. Boys are dirty and messy. Boys are loud. Boys are disruptive. They're clumsy. They have scraped knees and elbows. Mostly, they're different from the quiet, engaged, neat, clean, tidy, and wonderfully behaved girls. And they are different, because they're programmed to be different. It's not a problem if a boy, or a group of boys, or even a whole lot of boys are more like girls. The problem comes when you try to force those that aren't into being like that, the same way there's a problem when you try to force a tomboy into being a girly girl or vice versa. If you disagree, then we can certainly start forcing all girls to be huge tomboys and punish any little girl who likes to play with dolls or wear frilly dresses. We can make sure no one is who they are biologically programmed to be and punish them all equally for any violations.

    5. Re:What a load of utter shite. by butchersong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One might argue that structuring a boy's entire life in a such a way that every approved activity is completely at odds with their natural inclinations would have a predictable result of creating compulsive behavior around the few available activities that provide a release.

  5. Opting out of society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As much as people laugh at the Men Going Their Own Way movement, there is a growing number of men who feel that it is not worth the effort to put up with today's rapidly-changing standards of manhood.

  6. Missing The Point! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He also called for better sex education in schools

    When I'm with a girl, I'll wish I was watching pornography, because I'll never get rejected.

    Sex education does nothing to solve the real issues these Peter Pans are suffering. I'm pretty sure that the guy in the quote knows all about how "sex" works, probably in more detail than is actually needed.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  7. Rewards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It begins to change the reward center of the brain, and produces a kind of excitement and addiction. What I'm saying is — boys' brains are becoming digitally rewired...."When I'm in class, I'll wish I was playing World of Warcraft. When I'm with a girl, I'll wish I was watching pornography, because I'll never get rejected."

    Ok, I'll bite. It seems to me that the brain is just doing what it is supposed to do - adapt to the environment it is confronted with.

    The changes in rewards go far beyond the brain. As a society in the US at least we've greatly limited the options kids have when they graduate from college, so there is little true reward for spending time studying. Likewise, there is little benefit from having kids - they're a huge expense, and a major legal entanglement when that girl decides to reject you after you have the kid.

    If you want kids to study and get married, then you need to reward them from doing so - and not just in their brains.

    Or, we need to question why we want kids to do those things in the first place. Why is it so important that boys and girls get happily married? If the boys are just as happy alone, why not let them be happy alone? The obvious answer is so that we can have lots of babies running around, but I'm not really sure why it is so important that we have lots of babies running around either. We used to have them out of self-interest so that they could care for us in old age. With increases in productivity it is more likely that we'll end up caring for them in old age.

  8. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >When I'm in class, I'll wish I was playing World of Warcraft.
    Well, no shit. Most people would rather be doing something they like than something they don't like. And is it really a revelation that socially awkward nerds feel socially awkward around women?

  9. So like Japan? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The comments from the article sound eerily similar to those coming from Japanese men. More and more they are playing video games and watching porn rather than interacting with other people, most especially women.

    It might have something to do with control. When you're playing a game, you are in control of your character. You are still at the whim of your surroundings and other players, but you are in control of "yourself".

    Not so when approaching others and most especially women. With the decline of civility, asking a woman out and being rejected is no longer, "I'm sorry. I appreciate you asking but I'm just not interested" to, "Fucking loser! Why would you talk to me? Get the fuck out of here."

    It's easier to not bother than deal with asshats.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:So like Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is more about fear and lack of control over their life, two things young men will have in excess.

    2. Re:So like Japan? by Translation+Error · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With the decline of civility, asking a woman out and being rejected is no longer, "I'm sorry. I appreciate you asking but I'm just not interested" to, "Fucking loser! Why would you talk to me? Get the fuck out of here."

      It is?

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    3. Re:So like Japan? by PitaBred · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Smaller families, more invested in each child, less social interaction because of the child-abducting boogeymen (even though they are statistically insignificant and getting more so with each year). We've got a generation of kids that are growing up inside and not learning how to interact with people in non-sterile environments. When forced to deal with people that they can't just hit block on or ignore, they freeze up. Socialization is very much downplayed in our current culture, and it's apparently sorely needed by many.

      Don't take this as me saying they have to like everyone they meet. But you do have to learn some basic "get along with each other" skills that I'm finding many kids lack any more.

    4. Re:So like Japan? by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't fit into the category of men that today's women want; you know the type. All muscle no brain, the kind that will only screw her for one night and leave her with a child and no child support. Oh, I'm sorry... I let my cynicism show through there.

      Not your cynicism so much as your lack of interaction with women, forcing you rely upon media stereotypes as your primary source of information about this apparently inscrutable species.

      If you really feel that way and can't understand why, make some women friends. Friends friends, I mean, not girlfriends. Real friends, not cynical "I need to know more about this strange creature so I shall befriend it and learn its secrets" friends. It'll be worth your while.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  10. Re:You are quoting losers, so yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    pr0n costs much less than a girlfriend or a divorce.

  11. comic books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just like comic books and television screwed up a generation of kids, right? You could also use the same argument to say that kids in the 1800s just spent their time reading novels instead of having real life adventures.

  12. How about teach about love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And stop promoting promiscuity, which causes all sorts of emotional damage in the long term. Instead, let's promote loving relationships, sexual or otherwise.

    I'm not saying people shouldn't have premarital sex. I'm just saying that people shouldn't hook up with someone they met in a club or give it up on the first date.

    Same with porn. A little from time to time is fine. Watching really kinky stuff or watching it multiple times a day is not healthy.

    If there was more love in the world, there would be fewer problems, like single mothers, high divorce rates, and teenage pregnancies. But our school systems promote "sexual freedom", codewords for promiscuous behaviour. Let's change that by finding a middle ground between the conservative abstinence only bullshit and this liberal sex everywhere bullshit.

    Amen.

  13. Lingering effects of our puritanical past by Rigel47 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think there are many guys out there, video game addicts or otherwise, who would prefer masturbation to porn over sex with someone they like, trust, and feel comfortable with. The problem is, as Mr. Zimbardo alludes, we don't demystify sex for kids so that it becomes a regular life experience. If you never get anything more than an awkward biological overview of sex from school it will, at least for many boys, remain this mysterious, anxiety-provoking, forbidden fruit. Some magic experience that women zealously keep locked up in the castle. Porn is nothing more than a safe, artificial side-channel outlet for temporary relief of sexual frustration. It's lame but it is also understandable.

    tl;dr - Our society sucks when it comes to preparing kids for sexual maturity.

  14. Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ive dated a lot of women who it turns out are looking for the "cowboy" type or the "biker" type or the "go chiefs" type. And are unhappy with me because i havent subscribed to any of these store-bought personality templates.

    I prefer to just be who i am. A multifaceted individual with a wide variety of interests and hobbies.

    Women HATE that.

    1. Re:Agreed by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ive dated a lot of women who it turns out are looking for the "cowboy" type or the "biker" type or the "go chiefs" type. And are unhappy with me because i havent subscribed to any of these store-bought personality templates.

      I prefer to just be who i am. A multifaceted individual with a wide variety of interests and hobbies.

      Women HATE that.

      Here's the thing. Women are just as screwed up as men. However, in a slightly different way.

      Most women are initially attracted to 'the "cowboy" type or the "biker" type or the "go chiefs" type'. Though I'm not sure if it's an inherent thing, or learned. But they almost never want you to actually be that way long term. They want to turn you into that "multifaceted individual", not actually be that way from the start.

      Don't get me wrong, as men, we're just as screwed up as to what we're attracted to and what we want too.

    2. Re:Agreed by itzly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most women are initially attracted to 'the "cowboy" type or the "biker" type or the "go chiefs" type'. Though I'm not sure if it's an inherent thing, or learned. But they almost never want you to actually be that way long term.

      They are facing a wicked dilemma. She wants the cowboy/biker type with a unfaithful streak, because she want his genes for her sons and grandsons. On the other hand, she wants him to be nice and faithful to help raise their kids. So, the intended solution is to hook up with a rebel, and try to change him.

    3. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are facing a wicked dilemma. She wants the cowboy/biker type with a unfaithful streak, because she want his genes for her sons and grandsons. On the other hand, she wants him to be nice and faithful to help raise their kids. So, the intended solution is to hook up with a rebel, and try to change him.

      No, the intended solution is to hook up with him, have one or more of his kids, and then find some sucker to support her and her bastard offspring.

    4. Re:Agreed by Ryanrule · · Score: 4, Insightful

      no, what they REALLY want (and studies confirm) is to FUCK the bad boy, and MARRY the good guy. The good guy gets to raise the bad boys children. The good guys are opting out.

  15. neoconservative dreck. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Philip Zimbardo isnt doing science on this, hes regurgitating talking points from evangelical american christian leadership. porn addiction, insufficient masculinity, and "the vidja games" are all bitchcraft perfected by the likes of James Dobson and focus on the family as surrogates for their collective concern that america is "changing" and they dont like it.

    the excessive use of video games and online pornography is pushing young men into a crisis of masculinity that leaves them bored at school, disinterested in human contact, and opting out of society.

    Bullshit. Kids are bored at school because schools have been redesigned into standardized testing mills that cater to the lowest common denominator through inadequate funding and overzealous administrators. Theyre 'disinterested in human contact' because every single friend and acquaintence is manifest immediately in this neat new tool called the internet, and its generally only a pocket away. Theyre not opting out of society, theyre opting out of your idea of society. two failed wars have left them with limbless parents and friends that sit in the basement and eat cold canned raviolis. An entire generation has been shunned from the labour market because the adults they trust squandered through greed and hubris the future of society. And things they dont care about like abortion, gay marriage bans, and contraception have suddenly and inexplicably become the only thing in the last decade theyre forced to care about. theyre opting out because your pepperidge farm andy roony wank fest does not exist while a world of perpetual debt under minimum wage absolutely does.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  16. Re:You are quoting losers, so yeah. by TWX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's also far less rewarding.

    For those that want to claim that there are too many problems with the people they've dated, perhaps they need to take the time to evaluate the type of people they've been with, to figure out if there are any common traits that define them. They might discover that they're attracted to crazy people because of some interesting characteristic that unfortunately comes bundled with a whole slew of negative traits.

    At least that was my experience. Once I figured out the kind of woman that I shouldn't date and avoided dating them it was a lot easier.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  17. Merely scratches the surface by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's looking at the symptoms and declaring them to be the problem without any real understanding of the underlying causes.

    Guys focusing on video games and porn are a natural result in a society which is heavily biased in favor of women. Hell, I'd rather avoid dealing with women romantically too, given all the risks involved. All it takes is the mere accusation of rape, and a man's life can be torn to shreds. But even beyond that, we see a legal system completely set against men; custody, domestic violence, divorce? All stacked against men.

    So more men are choosing porn and forgoing women. Seems like a perfectly rational response to me.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Merely scratches the surface by grasshoppa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A valid point as well; young women's ability is overvalued while young men's abilities are undervalued.

      However, I suspect how society has been treating men for the past several decades plays into the VG and porn "addiction". We're told any sexual advances we ( men ) make are wrong, and they objectify women, but we're still expected to make them or we're "not men". Well, guess what? A lot of us are tired of the doublespeak and the games where we're always at a disadvantage ( one way or another, we're "wrong" ), so instead we choose to check out.

      Why bother? Why waste all that time and energy for a potential reward? Video games and porn are a guaranteed rate of return and thus, a better value.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  18. Many girls are batshit crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And really, why would young men take the risks? Not only is there an easy way out (that you lament), but there's also very little in the risk-benefit department. The demands on boys are insane: Treat women as equals, but provide for the family, but share responsibility for the kids and don't forget quality time with the wife, but forget about seeing the kids when the wife gets a divorce, but keep paying for the kids. Check your privilege, you're the reason why women clutch their purses and switch to the other side of the road, but be masculine and decisive, but ask for explicit consent, but make sure she really means it and won't change her mind, but don't be whipped. Fact is, a very large percentage of women are best avoided, not made sacrifices for, and I mean because they're bad for anyone, not just you. Yes, dating is a numbers game, but it looks like it has a big Russian roulette component lately.

  19. Never talk about feminity crisis. by gurps_npc · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I overheard a conversation recently. There were a girl upset that a guys at a party totally missed the fact that she wanted to be asked out. She flirted shamelessly, but the guy ignored her and instead asked out her friend - who promptly turned him down.

    They then both called the guy "an idiot".

    They missed the fact that SHE could have asked him out. It's the 21st century, not the 18th century.

    The reason guys spend all their time playing video games instead of out is that the video games are better than real life. Women expect men to be the 50's guy - bring flowers, etc. But they don't want to be the 50's girl.

    The crisis in Masculinity is concurrent with a crisis of femininity. They feed off each other like a viscous cycle. As long our culture continues to complain about men not acting like it thinks men should act - all the while encouraging women to do what they want, we will have no progress on this issue.

    Please note, I am not saying that women should act like a 50's girl. They are free to act like a modern woman. But don't complain about what men do and ignore what women do. (In fact, I think women should act like a modern women - and includes asking men out and buying them dinner for a first date. You want equality, you have to actually act equal, not insist on special treatment).

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Never talk about feminity crisis. by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They also seem to have missed the fact that maybe he isn't attracted to her in the slightest but is to her friend.

      How often do they call themselves idiots for not hooking up with the loser who was hitting on them all night and obviously interested?

  20. Re: You are quoting losers, so yeah. by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Translation: Girls don't like me, so it must be their fault.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  21. Some people are different, get over it by rtkluttz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not anti-science, but I do believe that too many times scientists draw conclusions based on biases. This is one of those. The bias seems to be that isolation is bad and that people should be around other people. He mentions that it changes brain function but names no specific trending to bad behavior because of those brain changes. Many people like to be alone, I am one of those. There is no better image of hell to me than living in a big city or doing the club thing. I would be perfectly content snowed into a swiss mountain cabin alone for 8 months as long as I had internet.

    --
    Digital is, by definition, imperfect. Analog is the way to go.
  22. reality sucks for most men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And it has since the beginning of "civilization".

    The top 10% of men in genetics or wealth get all of the benefits. The bottom 90% get to die in wars and in mines and in workplace accidents, supporting the harems and lifestyles of their "betters". If they don't die they go home to a woman who wishes she were still young and pretty enough to bag one of the alphas and she takes it out on him daily. His kids, coworkers and relatives don't respect him because for the last 50 years the western advertising machine has been propagating the message that the average man is boring, tedious, and disposable.

    Unlike reality videogames generally give you guaranteed reward for the amount of time you put into them. And competition is fundamentally fair since everyone starts at the same place. As opposed to reality where your ending status is very much determined by your starting status.

    Some men just aren't born to compete, and don't have the innate resilience to keep trying despite repeated failures. That doesn't mean those men are less deserving of happiness and satisfaction and peace, they just have to find their own and ignore the bullshit that "society" keeps heaping on them.

  23. Re: You are quoting losers, so yeah. by SirGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Only if you're a pussy and buy your girlfriend shit. If she says you need to buy her shit to prove you love her, run the other way, fast.

    So much for wanting equality. All women want to do is use men for their wallets, and then when they start losing their ability to do so because they are losing their beauty, they settle down with the stable guys they've rejected their whole lives.

    Then you're dating the wrong women. My wife isn't that way. She doesn't have a real diamond engagement ring (and she know it - she'd have killed me for spending $ 2+K on a ring.)

    Date a shallow woman, Get a shallow woman. Date an interesting woman, Get an interesting woman.

  24. 3rd Wave Feminism is causing this. by pecosdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Odds are stacked against men. From the fake "rape culture" propaganda and an environment that ensures if she regrets a hook up you will too, stacked courts, diminishing reasons to get married. Why hook up with a woman when she can change her mind, take at minimum half your stuff, and if you have kids the courts are stacking in such a way that a man will lose?

    Men are playing video games and retreating from women and normal society in general because masculine men have an uphill battle to fight. When even former places of refuge for men to be masculine are attempting to force masculinity out of society men are retreating even further into their own self contained worlds.

    3rd wave feminist recognized that men were retreating into games so they created the Gamer Gate fiasco which was nothing more than a false flag bitch-a-thon trying to take over that refuge as well. It's still a bit early to say, but I think they failed, but since Gamer Gate was nothing more than a political move rest assured, there will be another double-downed attempt to destroy that refuge again.

    Here's a really good book on the subject written by a woman no less, so don't dismiss it as just men sitting around bitching.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  25. Not normal male - normal HUMAN behavior. by denzacar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "conclusions" of "abnormal behavior" were made from observations that kids would rather be at home playing instead of sitting in a class AND from the fact that young humans will seek sexual satisfaction but avoid rejection.

    That sounds like something a ROBOT might find strange.
    Not a human being. Particularly not one who actually went through puberty at some point in their life.

    In short... like most psychology studies out there, this too is most probably bullshit.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  26. As a father with a daughter by Morpeth · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... most of the comments here scare the sh-t out of me.

    A lot of people whining that the world isn't fair to men, are you fucking kidding me? Who gets raped, men? RARELY. And the whole 'so many women falsely accuse men of rape'. That's total fucking bullshit.

    Who has to actually carry a child to term, and possibly raise them alone when the man bails, men? Who still are generally underpaid compared the other sex, men. Who runs the vast majority of the governments and writes the laws, men.

    I know lots of young egotistical narcissistic young men who think they're fucking so special that if a women rejects their 'charms', suddenly they're a b-tch or a c-nt. Comments above demonstrate the point perfectly.

    C'mon people, I'm not promoting self-flagellation, but seriously do you REALLY think that way?

    --

    'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
  27. Re:You are quoting losers, so yeah. by TWX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Exactly. After a string of toxic relationships I realized I was chasing women that needed to be saved. Trouble is, they always needed to be saved, they never stayed saved. They always had problems that had to be fixed by someone else, ie, me.

    Once I realized this, I made a point of avoiding women that were 'vulnerable' in the sense that they were on the tipping point of needing to be saved. The woman I married was self-sufficient and took care of her own problems when I met her, and if anything I provide that soundingboard for her to sanity-check ideas against and to vent to. On an entirely practical level I can take care of things that were previously contracted-out (ie, auto repair, house maintenance, technical support) but she knows how to get these things dealt with if necessary; if her car breaks down she can have it towed without requiring me to drop everything and rush to her side. We make each others' lives better, but we can each stand as individuals and take care of things without excessive drama. It allows us to be together because we want to be together, not because we're not functional in a co-dependent state.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  28. Re: You are quoting losers, so yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ding, ding, ding.

    Relationship portrayal in media is ridiculously far off from healthy relationships. Oafish, meek men in shows, moves, etc. are constantly shown as walking wallets who's sole goal in life is to please some insufferable, raging twat. It's infuriating. It's the equivalent of children watching Disney Channel shows, and using it as a model for how to interact with their parents.

    So, ya, don't chase shallow, selfish women.

  29. Re:Porn Solves a Problem by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    instant access to vast libraries or pornography is liberating men from the need to hitch themselves to a woman for sexual satisfaction

    That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. In the first place, how many people would rather watch porn than have sex? I'm not saying there's none, but in most cases it's probably rooted in anxiety as opposed to an actual preference, all else being equal. A choice made out of fear is not the same as a preference made out of desire.

    In the second place, porn wasn't a prerequisite for masturbation the last time I checked. And I checked pretty recently.