Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

More Than 40% of US Honeybee Colonies Died In a 12-Month Period Ending In April

Posted by samzenpus on from the won't-somebody-please-think-of-the-flowers? dept.

walterbyrd writes: The Agriculture Department released its annual honeybee survey Wednesday and it doesn't look good. More than 40% of U.S. honeybee colonies died in a 12-month period ending in April. While the precise cause of the honeybee crisis is unknown, scientists generally blame a combination of factors, including poor diets and stress. Some bees die from infestations of the Varroa mite, a bloodsucking parasite that weakens bees and introduces diseases to the hive. Environmental groups also point to a class of pesticides known as neonicotinoids. In April, the Environmental Protection Agency said it would stop approving new outdoor uses for those types of chemicals until more studies on bee health are conducted.

40 of 220 comments (clear)

  1. It's not limited to the US by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Informative

    Same problem in Europe.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:It's not limited to the US by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My parents have a small bee farm. They lost their colonies... Because it was too cold of a winter this year, and they froze.
      Global climate change, as created a lot of atypical, and more extreme weather conditions. I doubt there is a single issue, but a wide set of issues. I know it is complex and hard to put in a headline, so you vilify someone. But reality is there are not so many villains but the actions of many people. Often a combination of good intentions.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:It's not limited to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Same problem in Europe.

      Complete bullshit! The EU banned the pesticides US farmer use, and lo-and-behold, bee colonies stopped dying.

      Blame the farmers if you want, but ask why they're happy to kill and destroy the ecosystem first. They're being fucked over by the massive supermarket suppliers.

    3. Re: It's not limited to the US by drunk_punk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just curious... You're parents don't regulate temperature in any way?

    4. Re:It's not limited to the US by pastafazou · · Score: 4, Informative

      Complete bullshit is right! How is it that some regions that use neonics are not suffering any bee colony deaths at all? Australia is one of the heaviest users of neonics, yet their bee colonies are quite healthy. Canada's prairies also use neonics, yet their bees are doing absolutely fine. Neonics were in use for 15 years before these bee colony deaths began to appear. Certainly not very much correlation at all between usage of neonics and bee deaths. It's quite likely that the real culprit is the varroa mite, and the bee viruses it carries. The mite has become a serious problem in both the US and Europe, and the spread of the mite correlates much better with the spread of CCD.

    5. Re:It's not limited to the US by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Australia uses the neonics differently, as I recall. Something about the way they spread the pesticide makes it less likely to interfere with bees.

      That said, it's an insecticide. It's meant to kill insects, and they're generally pretty indiscriminate. It's also fairly likely that even if it's a sub-lethal dose for bees, it's a lethal dose for different beneficial insects.

      I think there are multiple causes--varroa mites have been around for decades without causing such widespread colony collapse. We've got a changing climate and agricultural monocultures, as well as stress from neonics (which it turns out honeybees may prefer over non-treated nectar).

      Looking for single causes is usually hopeless. But we can control our use of pesticides, so it's one of the things on the chopping block. One way or another, we have to bring this problem under control.

    6. Re:It's not limited to the US by Xest · · Score: 2

      To be fair, the European neonicotinoid ban is a bit half-arsed.

      They banned things like Imidacloprid, yet Thiacloprid and Acetamiprid which are both also neonicotinoids have not been banned.

      Conspiracy theorists in gardening communities (yes, they get everywhere) have this idea that the ban has nothing to do with the bees and has been carried out as a result of subversive lobbying by companies like Bayer whose patents on things like Imidacloprid are near their end can prevent generic brands entering the market and force everyone onto their still patented brands instead.

      But I'm not one for conspiracy theories without any evidence to back them, mostly I'd rather just assume it's typical political incompetence to only do a half assed job of temporarily banning neonicotinoids to measure the impact rather than the result of a conspiracy theory, so take what you will from that.

      I think it's unhelpful only doing a half assed job, because if things improve then companies like Bayer can say "Hey look, the bees are okay even though everyone is still using neonicotinoids like Thiacloprid!" and if there is no improvement, then they'll say "Oh, no change, so it wasn't the Imidacloprid so we can start selling it again" and environmentalists can say "Well, it's because other neonicotinoids are still in widespread use".

      So don't expect our ban in Europe to settle anything. It's not comprehensive enough to offer any conclusive results one way or another. At best it may throw a bit more correlation into the mix, but we have a lot of correlation, and not enough causation already.

    7. Re:It's not limited to the US by caseih · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Australia and western Canada, neonic-coated seads are typically placed in the ground via a gravity-fed metering system (box drill), or via an air drill that blows the seed into the ground behind shanks that open the soil. So dust particles laden with neonics get buried in the soil where bees won't be exposed directly to them. In the midwest US and eastern Canada, where the crops are predominantly things like soybeans or corn, they use vacuum planters which suck the seeds from storage one at time and drop them into the ground. Unfortunately the vacuum planters blow a lot of dust from the seeds into the air. So neonic-laden particles get blown everywhere and we know they affect bees and any other insect. So it could very well be that widespread use of vacuum planters is a part of the problem. Unfortunately air drills don't work very well for row crops that do best with rows of singulated seeds.

      The Alberta Bee Keepers Commission refuses to back any attempt to completely ban neonic use in Canada as it would decimate their industry. Fewer crops means fewer bees are required by farmers.

      The reason neonics are used is that when the plant is young, the neonics are taken up through the plant and make the plant toxic to pests that would eat the little leaves, killing the plant. On one of my dry bean fields last year was seeded without neonic seed treatment, and we did see some yield reduction from pests eating the plants at an early stage, including from works eating the shoots underground. If there's a chance neonics can be used safely, then for sure they are a huge benefit.

      There is the other issue of neonics present in the pollen, leading to bees getting a bit of a buzz. It's not clear to me how much neonic there is in the flower at that late stage of the plant's growth, or what the consequences of that are. Bees around here are heavily used to pollinate hybrid canola, all of which was treated with neonics. So it's really hard to say what the consequences are.

      It's true we can control the use of pesticides, and we should and do. This doesn't have to mean an outright ban. A complete ban would mean the return to more toxic insecticides being sprayed at more regular intervals on a crop, which none of us wants.

    8. Re:It's not limited to the US by bmajik · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Someone else covered this but is buried.

      Bee colonies do not freeze in the winter. They starve.

      We've been keeping bees in North Dakota, which is colder than wherever you are, for 7 years. All 3 of our colonies survived last winter. One is strong enough that we've split it this spring to try and prevent a swarm.

      The way that bees operate in winter is amazing. The bees form a sphere, with the queen near its center. They vibrate their wings and bodies to create heat. The bees on the outside of the sphere obviously lose heat the fastest. The bees on the inside stay the warmest. The sphere of vibrating bees constantly turns itself inside out, over and over, so that the cooler outer edge bees return to the warm core and replenish their warmth, while the warm bees from the core circulate out towards the edges after they've recuperated.

      This consumes lots of energy (and food).

      As the cluster of bees does this, it moves upwards in the hive, consuming stored honey.

      When they get to the top of the hive, they stop migrating. If they run out of honey, they die.

      We use 2 deep supers and 1 medium honey super to over-winter our bees.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    9. Re:It's not limited to the US by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      If they run out of honey, they die.

      ... unless you feed them. My mom is a beekeeper, and we always had a few hives while I was growing up. We would periodically put a feeder jar of sugar water in the hive opening starting in January or February. The bees prefer honey, so they will leave the sugar water alone until they are low on honey. Once they start aggressively eating the sugar water, we knew they were out of honey, and would switch to daily feedings. We also packed straw around the hives for insulation.

    10. Re:It's not limited to the US by Zorpheus · · Score: 2

      I believe that too. Parasites and disease evolve so that they don't kill their host, since they would die too then. But they weaken their hosts. The combination of several ones can be deadly due to this.
      Leprosy disappeared in Europe when some big Tuberculosis epidemics came. People with Leprosy got infected quickly and died. Does is make sense to blame their dead on just one of the two diseases?
      You can take any of the factors which are weakening bees away to solve the problem. Best would be to reduce all of them, but neonics are the only factor that can be reduced easily.

    11. Re: It's not limited to the US by Anguirel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bee Keepers don't need to regulate temperature in any way. The bees do that for themselves (in the wild as well as in keeper's hives). They do need enough honey to make it through the winter, though.

      --
      ~Anguirel (lit. Living Star-Iron)
      QA: The art of telling someone that their baby is ugly without getting punched.
  2. Take A Bow For Your Accomplishments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thank you Monsanto, DuPont, etc etc...

    1. Re:Take A Bow For Your Accomplishments by Tx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not proven that any particular pesticide or agro-chemical is to blame. The fact that urban bees are thiving in cities such as Paris and London, despite all the pollution in those environments, is inteesting. One mooted possibile reason is that cities have lots of different species of plants in their gardens and parks, blooming at differing times, so that there is always nectar available from some of them. In the countryside by contrast, with modern, vast, single-crop farms, it may be that there is only one species of plant in the bees environment, and once that crop finishes blooming, in sometimes a pretty small window of time, there is no more nectar. So it could be farming practices and lack of rural biodiversity that are to blame, at least in significant part.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    2. Re:Take A Bow For Your Accomplishments by NotDrWho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forgot big oil, global warming, the War on Terror, the Koch Brothers, and all the other lefty bogeymen. May as well get them too while you're talking out of your ass.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    3. Re:Take A Bow For Your Accomplishments by caseih · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In Alberta, where there are more commercial bee keeping operations than anywhere in Canada, of honey and other types, and where neonic use is higher than in many other places. Bees are simply are not having the problems seen elsewhere. The bee keepers association here in Alberta is strongly opposed to an outright neonic ban because it would severely hurt their pollination and honey business. Without neonics there would be a lot less Canola and other crops to pollinate.

      Now, this isn't to say that neonics aren't a big part of the problem of bees dying elsewhere. It could have to do with how the neonics are being used. In Alberta they are used when treating the seeds with fungicide, and typically they are placed in the ground with a gravity-fed drill, or an air drill that blows them into the ground. So all the neonic residue gets placed under the soil. In other places, they use vacuum planters (corn, soybeans) which blows neonic-laden dust into the air. So it could be this that contributes to the problem.

    4. Re:Take A Bow For Your Accomplishments by BlackPignouf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While "innocent until proven guilty" is typically the right approach, "huge assholes until proven otherwise" has always been extremely accurate for Monsanto.

    5. Re:Take A Bow For Your Accomplishments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thank you Monsanto, DuPont, etc etc...

      You are right to thank them. Over the years they have helped to dramatically increase crop yields to keep the price of food down. The left is constantly yammering on about the plight of the poor out of one side of their mouth and then demonizing the people who make food affordable out of the other. Monsanto has probably done more to help the poor than all the give away programs combined.

    6. Re:Take A Bow For Your Accomplishments by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      While "innocent until proven guilty" is typically the right approach, "huge assholes until proven otherwise" has always been extremely accurate for Monsanto.

      False. The "until proven otherwise" would imply that this has happened at any point, which would be untrue. They (Monsanto) are just huge assholes all the time.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. Who's paying DICE again? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

    While the precise cause of the honeybee crisis is unknown, scientists generally blame a combination of factors, including poor diets and stress. Some bees die from infestations of the Varroa mite, a bloodsucking parasite that weakens bees and introduces diseases to the hive. Environmental groups also point to a class of pesticides known as neonicotinoids.

    Because environmental groups, of course, are just a bunch of nutjobs and couldn't possibly include scientists...

    Get ready for the "humanity will survive because reason xyz" posts, possibly something about pollinating crops with low-paying jobs or even freakin' drones or something.

    [Robbie comes back from school in a bad mood]
    Robbie: [to the Grapdelites] Thanks for everything. I got an F. [throws his notebook close to the Grapdelites]
    Grapdelite 2: Oh, careful!
    Robbie: Oh, sorry. I didn't see you.
    Grapdelite 1: He seems distressed.
    Grapdelite 2: I hope it's nothing we done.
    Robbie: "Why dinosaurs ruled the Earth?" And I wrote a whole essay about what you guys said about how we're too wise to eat all the grapes. Look what the teacher wrote. [shows the Grapdelites his paper]
    Grapdelite 1: "There'll always be more grapes. That's what 'more' means."

    --
    Get free satoshi (Bitcoin) and Dogecoins
  4. What is normal and how many were born? by BitZtream · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Over a 200 year period, 100% of the humans on the planet die ... of course, more are born to replace them so the population actually grows ... making that number that looked super duper scary ... pretty much normal.

    So ... 40% in and of itself doesn't mean anything to me if Bees only live 2-3 years anyway.

    How many new colonies were formed and how was the total population effected in the end.

    The title and summary give no indication that something is wrong, only the indication that someone wants a sensationalist headline.

    Facts please ... you know, news for nerds.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:What is normal and how many were born? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, Mr Basic Reading Comprehension Failure, without even needing to read the article, the summary actually says colonies not bees.

    2. Re:What is normal and how many were born? by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

      Unless honey bee colonies are immortal, I'm pretty sure there is still a normal range that would be relevant.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    3. Re:What is normal and how many were born? by JSC · · Score: 4, Informative

      Reading the article reveals this... "In an annual survey released on Wednesday by the Bee Informed Partnership, a consortium of universities and research laboratories, about 5,000 beekeepers reported losing 42.1 percent of their colonies in the 12-month period that ended in April. That is well above the 34.2 percent loss reported for the same period in 2013 and 2014, and it is the second-highest loss recorded since year-round surveys began in 2010."

      --
      Time's fun when you're having flies. - Kermit the Frog
    4. Re: What is normal and how many were born? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am a beekeeper. 30% of feral bee colonies do not survive naturally and is also the number I try to maintain to keep genetic diversity. With that said other beekeepers and myself do not report this as loss to the DOA and count this as the price of doing business. I am right in line with this number with 10% loss on top of what I dispatched.

    5. Re:What is normal and how many were born? by silentcoder · · Score: 3, Informative

      The normal lifespan of a bee colony is measured in decades or in rare cases even centuries.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    6. Re: What is normal and how many were born? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      I am a beekeeper. 30% of feral bee colonies do not survive naturally and is also the number I try to maintain to keep genetic diversity. With that said other beekeepers and myself do not report this as loss to the DOA and count this as the price of doing business. I am right in line with this number with 10% loss on top of what I dispatched.

      Very interesting. Good info for the readers here. Thanks.

    7. Re:What is normal and how many were born? by vikingpower · · Score: 5, Informative
      Son of a former beekeeper speaking here.

      In summer, a typical worker bee lives for about 6 weeks. 8 weeks, maybe 10, if she has one of the rare posts of guardians at the bee colony's entry, or is one of the even fewer bees that feed the queen. Bees literally work themselves to death. The replenishment rate is, during summer, 100%; this is taken care of by the queen. A typical bee colony has between 10,000 and 40,000 bees in high summer, then goes into winter with about 1,000 bees, clumped around the queen to keep her warm, and comes out of winter with 400 to 600 bees. We are talking about apis mellifera carnica here, the so-called Italian bee, which is the variety most commonly used by beekeepers.

      An entire colony dying in spring or early summer is, normally, an extremely rare event, and indicates either an epidemy, or severe poisoning. Varroa mites are a known cause, but are a largely contained phenomenon now, at least in professional bee-keeping circles. What remains, is ... poisoning. Neonicotinoids or something else.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  5. Indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The fact that urban bees are thiving [treehugger.com] in cities such as Paris and London, despite all the pollution in those environments, is inteesting.

    Where the carpet bombing of these pesticides is not done.

    Interesting indeed.

    1. Re:Indeed. by pastafazou · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, there's no carpet bombing of neonics, that's not how they're applied.

    2. Re:Indeed. by bugs2squash · · Score: 4, Funny

      They are painstakingly rubbed into the fur of each bee individually.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    3. Re:Indeed. by xevioso · · Score: 3, Funny

      Exactly. It takes a while but it is worth it; the bee actually really loves to be massaged and have his tummy rubbed.

  6. Addicted by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2

    Didn't someone publish a report stating that the bees were getting addicted to the nicotine?

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  7. Paywalls? You amateurs by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Slashdot must be getting kickbacks from the NYT because all the story links go to their paywall now. But a nerd would go right to the source because the NYT is a fat fucking waste of time any more. They're the next CNN or Faux News, they just sensationalize other people's news. Too bad this ain't News for Nerds any more.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Re:What's the normal percentage? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Normal should be a range.

    Normal is when someone tells you 10% and you translate in your head to "around 10%". Nobody likes the kind of person who refuses to do that kind of translation in conversation. Trust me. If you really cared, you would have looked it up, which would have taken no longer than bitching about it.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. Re:Holy Fuck by Carewolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Take a bee colony and stick them in a deep freeze and see how many survive. In case anyone missed it, the U.S. and Europe experienced record cold this winter. How fucking stupid do you have to be to not put 2 and 2 together?

    Europe had an exceptionally warm and mild winter this year.

  10. Re:What's the normal percentage? by Rande · · Score: 2

    I blame the immortal queens going around decapitating the other immortal queens.
    "There can bee only one."

  11. Re:Holy Fuck by gnaac · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not al of the US had record cold this winter either. Yes, the North East portions had a lot of cold and snow, but in the Pacific NW there was an exceptionally mild aka warm) winter with very little snow. Snowpack in the mountains is 25% of where they normally are this time of year. Lowest snowpack on record according to this article: http://www.wunderground.com/ne...

  12. Groups a bit slower than the others. by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 4, Informative

    Post to Submission that originally linked to paywall

    2009
    Scientists Isolate and Treat Parasite Causing Decline in Honey Bee Population
    http://science.slashdot.org/st...

    2010
    Mystery of the Dying Bees Solved
      "As it turns out, the fungus N. ceranae that was thought to be killing off bee colonies had a partner in crime — a DNA-based virus that worked in tandem with N. ceranae to compromise nutrition uptake" Note: (N. ceranae = Parasite)
      http://science.slashdot.org/st...

      2012
      Studies Link Pesticides To Bee Colony Collapse Disorder
      http://science.slashdot.org/st...

    2015
    It's the pesticides!

  13. Strange swarm behavior by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2

    We've seen strange swarm behavior here in Southern California the past two years. Anecdotes follow:

    Last year, we had a swarm that probably lost its Queen (or didn't have one to begin with). They maintained a big ball in the tree for nearly four months, gradually all dying off. They made no honeycomb, just a few weird strands of propolis. In the past, when swarms failed to form a new hive, they didn't continue to go and harvest pollen and function like a hive, but all died off much more rapidly.

    This year, we had a swarm ball up in a tree mid-afternoon. They hadn't found a hive by the next morning. By the next evening, they were all falling to the ground and writhing as if poisoned or something. By the second day, there were just heaps of dead bees all around the garden.

    I don't claim to be any expert (although my Dad kept several hives when I was a kid). Still, I haven't seen this before. I don't know the cause of either phenomenon.

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net