Slashdot Mirror


Planetary Society Wants To Launch a Crowd-Funded Solar Sail

jan_jes writes to note that The Planetary Society is attempting to crowdfund its own version of the light-powered space-craft popularized by Carl Sagan as a "solar sailer." (YouTube video, with the Society's CEO Bill Nye.) The current model is a CubeSat no bigger than a breadbox with four sails. If the team manages to raise enough money, LightSail will be sent to orbit aboard a SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket in 2016. LightSail will be released into an orbit with an altitude of 720 kilometers (450 miles), high enough to escape most of the planet's atmospheric drag. Their crowdfunding goal has been far surpassed (more than $476,000 at this writing), but more can't hurt; maybe NASA could use some of the surplus.

34 of 52 comments (clear)

  1. breadbox measurements by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    is that in micro-refrigerators or slices-per-second?

  2. Happy and sad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Happy because people can get together and do something meaningful.
    Sad because bureaucrats can't be convinced this is a meaningful endeavor.

    NASA could have being a driving force in all this kind of apparently crazy experiments. But is struggling with the quantity of pork distributed by politicians from the meager budget to their home states.

    1. Re:Happy and sad news by meerling · · Score: 1

      Trash?
      Why, because you don't agree with scientific exploration? It's a real world proof of concept and will give a real basis to build upon this technology and technique. Besides, those 3 cubesats in it are more than just com systems, though the data from even that has some value. As far as satellites and probes go, this is small and cheap, so it's bang for the buck is better than most.

      "bureaucrats" ...
      You mean the old sods that can't figure out the value of anything other than bribes, err, campaign contributions, and pork, err, vote buying by spending money on local though dubious projects? Yeah, that means nothing. In case you haven't noticed, our current crop of politicians are lucky they can read.

      not a meaningful "experiment"
      Great, just tell me what the actual acceleration it would achieve is, and what all the data it's other sensors (whatever those will be) will send back, and I'll accept that statement of yours. You can't? Well of course not, that's why we do these kinds of things. We can make mathematical models and analyze those all we want, but until we get realworld data, we just don't know if there's anything else out there to mess with the results. Did you know there has been anomalous thrust on the pioneer and voyager probes? Funny how we would have no idea something like that could happen until we actually sent those probes for real. By the way, they are still studying that data, and they think they've figured that mystery out, but it's not up to the whole seven sigmas thing yet.

      NASA does not waste its limited budget
      I'm glad you recognize NASAs budget limitations and understand that at the current funding levels and lack of appropriate launch vehicles they can't even keep up with their current orbital responsibilities. You do know that our network of both communication, weather, and GPS satellites is in poor repair and greatly in need of new satellites? Well it's true.

      Are you worried that all this research and exploration of space has no apparent benefit to us? Well let's put it this way, it has been reported that less than 2 measly centuries ago, early pioneers of electricity were ask of what use electricity had. At that time, they just didn't know. These days, you probably can't imagine living without it.

    2. Re:Happy and sad news by AqD · · Score: 1

      Thank God, NASA does not waste its limited budget by sending trash to orbit!

      It shouldn't have limited budget! It's our future!

    3. Re:Happy and sad news by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Trash? Why, because you don't agree with scientific exploration? It's a real world proof of concept and will give a real basis to build upon this technology and technique. Besides, those 3 cubesats in it are more than just com systems, though the data from even that has some value. As far as satellites and probes go, this is small and cheap, so it's bang for the buck is better than most.

      I don't agree with scientific exploration just because i think that this is already proven and tested concept (from NASA and other national space agencies)? What new "data" this will provide? Did you read something i didn't?

      "bureaucrats" ... You mean the old sods that can't figure out the value of anything other than bribes, err, campaign contributions, and pork, err, vote buying by spending money on local though dubious projects? Yeah, that means nothing. In case you haven't noticed, our current crop of politicians are lucky they can read.

      Please dude, i am Greek, i don't pay for NASA, but it was those "bureaucrats" (with USA's citizens money) that also helped advance space/scientific exploration, benefiting the whole world.

      not a meaningful "experiment" Great, just tell me what the actual acceleration it would achieve is, and what all the data it's other sensors (whatever those will be) will send back, and I'll accept that statement of yours. You can't? Well of course not, that's why we do these kinds of things. We can make mathematical models and analyze those all we want, but until we get realworld data, we just don't know if there's anything else out there to mess with the results. Did you know there has been anomalous thrust on the pioneer and voyager probes? Funny how we would have no idea something like that could happen until we actually sent those probes for real. By the way, they are still studying that data, and they think they've figured that mystery out, but it's not up to the whole seven sigmas thing yet.

      what new "data" this will provide? did you read something i didn't? what "sensors"???

      NASA does not waste its limited budget I'm glad you recognize NASAs budget limitations and understand that at the current funding levels and lack of appropriate launch vehicles they can't even keep up with their current orbital responsibilities. You do know that our network of both communication, weather, and GPS satellites is in poor repair and greatly in need of new satellites? Well it's true.

      Of course i recognize recognize NASAs budget limitations (i.e., i recognize that USA citizens can't fund space exploration, benefiting the whole world, without limits), so i don't like it when someone (not you- the guy i responed to his comment) tries to imply that NASA (so, USA citizens) should waste money for projects not meaningfull as EXPERIMENTS anymore.

      Are you worried that all this research and exploration of space has no apparent benefit to us? Well let's put it this way, it has been reported that less than 2 measly centuries ago, early pioneers of electricity were ask of what use electricity had. At that time, they just didn't know. These days, you probably can't imagine living without it.

      BUT WHAT NEW "DATA" THIS WILL PROVIDE AND WHAT "SENSORS" WILL THIS HAVE? DID YOU READ SOMETHING I DIDN'T???

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    4. Re:Happy and sad news by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      I am Greek, i benefit from NASA, but i don't pay for NASA, USA citizens do - and there is not such thing as "UN-limited budged" for anything...

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    5. Re:Happy and sad news by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      "I am Greek..." and "...and there is not such thing as 'UN-limited budged' for anything..." appear to be contradictory. Your economy appears to have run as if it was unlimited...

      Once again we Greeks educate the barbarians - so: this should be a lesson for the rest of world...

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    6. Re:Happy and sad news by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      What future? Solar sailing is of very limited use. Do you imply our future is to sail to the Moon or Mars? So far, there is nothing there we can benefit much. And beyond Mars, solar sailing become much less efficient. Interstellar travel is out of question.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
  3. Sagan? Don't you mean Clarke? by kenwd0elq · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With a 1963 SF story in the Scouting magazine "Boy's Life", I believe that Arthur C. Clarke beat Carl Sagan to the "solar sail" idea by a decade or so.

  4. Re:Yeah yeah yeah by qpqp · · Score: 1

    putting saran wrap in space

    They ended up putting it on people's windows boxen instead.

  5. I'll throw in if we name it Planet Pluto by sandbagger · · Score: 1

    Just sayin'

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
  6. Carl who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Carl sagaN perhaps?

    1. Re:Carl who? by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      That's the new POS freemium game: "The Carl Crush Saga"...

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    2. Re:Carl who? by Opyros · · Score: 1

      Carl Saga was a legend in his own time...

  7. Solution to Global Warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does anybody else think that this could be a solution to global warming? If we can mass produce these and send them up using SpaceX re-usable rockets the cost should be relatively low. They could reflect as much or little sunlight as needed. They could even remove heat over hurricanes to mitigate damage. We could even reduce temperatures at the equator and increase temperatures in the northern/southern latitudes if desired. In the long run it would be a good way to heat up mars, cool off venus, and make the moon more habitable.

    1. Re:Solution to Global Warming? by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Given the tiny size of the sails, i think painting all the roads and parking lots to reflect light would work better.

    2. Re:Solution to Global Warming? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      i think painting all the roads and parking lots to reflect light would work better.

      A yes, a perfect plan, with no draw*CRASH*

      It helps to be able to see while driving.

      Cars suck and roads need to go.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Re:Sagan? Don't you mean Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hence "popularized" not "invented." It really wasn't one of Clarke's best-known shorts, and though I'm just guessing, I'd imagine that a visible celebrity like Sagan, on a then-popular show like Carsons, got more awareness for the idea.

  9. Eff that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I want to see an EM drive go into space.

    I'm 95% sure it won't work... but can you imagine if it does.

    1. Re:Eff that... by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

      Science fiction writers Jerry Pournelle and Larry Niven often have "real scientists" run the numbers on their stories. Pournelle believes that a big enough laser could launch satellites from the ground into orbit.

      Only part of the thrust would be light pressure; a volatile "fuel core" being vaporized by the ground-based laser would provide much of the blast-off thrust. But you'd still have the advantage of having your "engine" here on Earth, being able to repair or replace it as needed, and eliminating having to boost your engine to orbital velocity.

      With Moon-based lasers (several of them spaced around the Moon) you could push a lightsail-powered probes to interplanetary distances, and perhaps even to the stars. This is one of the plot elements of the Niven & Pournelle story "The Mote In God's Eye".

  10. useless.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Massive liability. You can't afford to have a few small asteroid piercing holes in that while flying in space.

    1. Re:useless.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.

  11. Re:Sagan? Don't you mean Clarke? by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

    The story was a good one and was anthologized in several collections. But Clarke was a real genius, where Sagan only talked a good game. If Clarke had patented all the innovative ideas that he wrote stories about - like geosynchronous communications satellites or ground-controlled approaches in bad weather - he'd have been richer than Bill Gates and Warren Buffet combined.

  12. Re:Sagan? Don't you mean Clarke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    - like geosynchronous communications satellites

    Fewer than a dozen communications satellites were launched before his patent would have expired, and some of those were Soviet, and only two of them were geosynchronous.

  13. Re:slush fund by Aliotroph · · Score: 3, Informative

    No clue? Their Kickstarter page currently has stretch goals listed covering up to $1 million. Their site (linked from the Kickstarter) explains they estimate needing $5.45 million for the entire project - which I assume includes the parts they've completed, including the test launch this month - and that they have raised $4.2 million of that so far. They seem to have a handle on what they want to do with the money. They aren't building a mysterious slush fund.

    It's hard to guess at how much they will raise in the end, but complex projects often go over budget or suffer technical issues. Any extra money not accounted for by their stated goals will likely go towards those things.

  14. Re:Sagan? Don't you mean Clarke? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2

    Patenting "geosynchronous communications satellites"...well, to quote Clarke himself:"I learned from my patent attorney that even if I had tried to patent the communications satellite in 1945, the patent would have been rejected because the required technology did not yet exist, and the patent wouldn't have been worth getting because its life would only have been 17 years. The patent would have expired the year before the Early Bird was launched." So...unfortunately he wouldn't have. By publishing the idea and not patenting it, he put the idea into the public domain for the betterment of mankind. Of course, the patent system back then wasn't nearly as horrible as it is today...

  15. Re:slush fund by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2

    the rest of it is going to fund the 2016 Tyson / Nye Presidential campaign....I wish...

  16. Re:Sagan? Don't you mean Clarke? by braindrainbahrain · · Score: 2

    I admire Clarke as much as anybody here, but he admits he did not invent the geostationary orbit (though he was the first to suggest using the orbit for communications satellites). The idea had been proposed as early as the 19th century by Tsiolkovsky. Citation available here (paywalled, sorry, but you can get the gist from the abstract).

  17. First Launch by lenmaster · · Score: 1

    The first test launch is actually just a few days away on May 20. You can watch it live at http://sail.planetary.org/miss....

  18. Re:Here we go again by lenmaster · · Score: 1

    Failure is generally a necessary part of the process of innovation. As long as we take valuable lessons away, we should not be afraid of or ashamed of failure. If we simply gave up every time we failed at something or didn't try unless we were 100% sure we wouldn't fail, we'd never get anywhere in science and technology.

  19. Re:Sagan? Don't you mean Clarke? by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

    Predating Clarke's story, Planet of the Apes, also from 1963, featured a solar sailing interstellar ship.

  20. Re:slush fund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't think Mike Tyson would make a very good president.

  21. Clark? Don't you mean Cordwainer Smith? by Rujiel · · Score: 1

    The girl who sailed The Soul was written in 1960, and had interstellar travel via infrared sails thousands of miles long.

  22. When for actual exploration? by CosmicHuman · · Score: 1

    After the test flights, we need to use these solar sailing spacecraft for actual exploration of the solar system. Solar Sailing should be in use for probes by now. It's been too long... It could be a much cheaper alternative to chemical propulsion, and it and ion drives are the future. Maybe these propulsion techniques could eventually be used for manned spaceflight. But what we are really waiting for is nuclear propulsion. If we sent a large spacecraft, constructed in orbit, and powered with Project Orion-style nuclear pulse propulsion, or project Daedalus-style nuclear propulsion, we could be to Alpha Centauri in the same period of time it took for Voyager to leave the Solar System. But the folks in Washington don't want to divert money from short term, human goals to make this possible. Not to mention the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. It needs to be revised so we can do it legally.