Slashdot Mirror


Pre-Orders Start For Neo900 Open Source Phone

New submitter JoSch1337 writes: After a year and a half of development, the Neo900 project now opened its web shop for the down payments of binding pre-orders for either a full Neo900 phone or the bare circuit board to upgrade an existing Nokia N900. The up-front down payment is necessary to now secure expensive "risk parts" like the modem, 1GB RAM and N900 cases. Thus, without pre-ordering now, there might not be enough parts left after the first batch.

The Neo900 is the spritual successor of the Nokia N900. The new circuit board can be placed into an existing N900 for better specs (faster CPU, more RAM, LTE modem) than the original device while still maintaining fremantle (maemo 5) backwards compatibility. Alternatively, a fully assembled phone can be purchased as well. The Neo900 will be fully operational without any binary blob running on the main CPU. While the modem still requires a non-free firmware, it is completely decoupled from the rest of the device (think of a LTE usb stick you put in your laptop) and can reliably be monitored or switched off by the operating system.

You can follow the development of the project in the maemo forum, read about the specs of the device or consult the FAQ

134 comments

  1. Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The love child of Openmoko and N900. I think if they deliver on the promise, this will change the way people view their mobile devices. Motherboard replacements and case replacements will gain traction just like in the assemble your own PC era.

    1. Re:Great News by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      I think if they deliver on the promise, this will change the way people view their mobile devices. Motherboard replacements and case replacements will gain traction just like in the assemble your own PC era.

      It will have quite a hard doing what you claim when only a fraction of a fraction of 1% of phone buyers will ever hear of its existence.

    2. Re:Great News by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would actually be willing to spend money on a phone I actually OWN as opposed to one owned by Verizon and Google that they just let me hold.

    3. Re:Great News by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Forgot to log in, did ya? ;)

    4. Re:Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or like, Google is trying with Project Ara

    5. Re:Great News by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Interesting

      http://www.oneplus.net/

      Not completely open but easy enough to install whatever ROM you want. No carrier, and with the right ROM, no Google either. And it is a great phone.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    6. Re:Great News by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Cool! I will look in to this!

    7. Re:Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Then the state will require photo id to obtain a sim card; as well as a fingerprint or iris scan.

      Technology is not the problem.
      Corporations are not the problem.
      States with guns who will use them against its subjects are the problem.

    8. Re:Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Motherboard replacements and case replacements will gain traction just like in the assemble your own PC era.

      Ha ha ha! That's a good one.

    9. Re:Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this website does not work without javascript so unfortunately i cant view the details about this " almost one hundred percent free" piss hardware. you would think that with your marketing speak the company would try cater to the people they are marketing towards but it seems they dont. too bad.

    10. Re:Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this website does not work without javascript so unfortunately i cant view the details about this

      Because you are carrying on a crusade against the fait accompli of the scriptization of the web in virtually its entirety? Do you also have a 55 year old car that has no ECU? Do you refuse to use a cellphone because OMG the tracking?

    11. Re:Great News by JoSch1337 · · Score: 2

      I can install "any ROM I want" on a number of devices. That still does not mean that the modem does not anymore get access to the device's main memory...

    12. Re:Great News by hawguy · · Score: 2

      I think if they deliver on the promise, this will change the way people view their mobile devices. Motherboard replacements and case replacements will gain traction just like in the assemble your own PC era.

      It will have quite a hard doing what you claim when only a fraction of a fraction of 1% of phone buyers will ever hear of its existence.

      It looks too big and clunky to take significant market share -- replaceable components mean larger size and less integrated "fit and finish". There may be a niche market for something like this, but it seems unlikely to reach the mainstream -- I'd rather pay $400 every few years for a brand new phone that's (relatively) small and compact and works reliably with a warranty than spend $200 every year or two to upgrade components and then am on my own with making sure those components work well together. "If I replace the LCD with the new one, will my GPU still work? If I upgrade the GPU, do I need a new motherboard? I'd like a new 802.11ac wifi module, but it's not compatible with my GSM module"

    13. Re:Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no crusade....i want things to work and do so quickly. js prevents this. in most cases i see when things are developed without unnecessary scripting that has no benefit to me they work better. thank you for trying to make things that arent broken seem outdated for no reason other than contrarieism.

    14. Re:Great News by Foresto · · Score: 1

      It looks too big and clunky to take significant market share

      It's probably smaller than you think. It's shorter and narrower than all of the current "mini" and "compact" phones, and just slightly thicker than the tiniest qwerty smartphone I have ever seen. Here's a size comparison.

    15. Re:Great News by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Will your followup also be about how you don't own a television and you shake your fists at clouds while reminiscing about wearing onions on your belt?

    16. Re:Great News by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      They are only making a couple hundred. So it would be impossible for it to take any significant market share regardless of the fit and finish.

    17. Re:Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope. love cable tv and unions occasionally upset my bowel. i would love to see a reply about how what i said was incorrect though. hugs and kisses /. =-)

    18. Re:Great News by igloo-x · · Score: 0

      How about this

      you would think that with your marketing speak the company would try cater to the people they are marketing towards but it seems they dont. too bad.

      They're not marketing towards you, because people who turn Javascript off and go out of their way to post about it on internet forums are statistical background noise, and are more trouble than they're worth.

    19. Re:Great News by alantus · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with him, I visited the website and found no good reason for using Javascript.
      Websites should at least be able to display it's content without Javascript enabled.

    20. Re:Great News by Trogre · · Score: 2

      http://www.fairphone.com/ is another option.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    21. Re:Great News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parts service isn't great though. Pal dropped is OnePlusOne and they wanted to charge him $300 to replace the screen, which was well over 50% of the cost of the phone itself (at purchase).

  2. Great News by rakshat · · Score: 1

    The love child of Openmoko and N900. I think if they deliver on the promise, this will change the way people view their mobile devices. Motherboard replacements and case replacements will gain traction just like in the assemble your own PC era.

  3. And already slashdotted by 1_brown_mouse · · Score: 1

    Poor web shop

  4. That poor, poor website... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    It never even had a chance... :) Anyone know the price, and timeline? No way to get it from the source.

    1. Re: That poor, poor website... by rakshat · · Score: 3, Informative

      900 odd euro for the board at max. End 2015 delivery. Have to make a down payment now to book

    2. Re: That poor, poor website... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      And yet you claim above that people are going to buy this over the countless number of cheaper phones? Care to share what your smoking?

  5. Website hosted on the phone? by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That is the only feasible explanation for it being down right now. We know this site doesn't direct enough traffic to take down any website that is more robust than that.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Website hosted on the phone? by dos1 · · Score: 2

      We weren't ready to make the shop public yet - it was just sent to ~400 previous donors so far (hence no mentions about shop anywhere on main website). Plus the /. traffic came when I was away from the PC - reconfiguring server via SSH session on the phone is pretty tough :)

  6. Slashdotted by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Site's not coming up now...

    Definitely gotta order me one of these, once I save up all that money.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  7. Cost by ledow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "According to current calculations, the cost of the motherboard should be somewhere around 990 EUR. The complete device will cost about 150 EUR more, depending on prices and availability of N900 spare parts."

    Holy cow, freedom (at least partial freedom) comes at a seriously hefty price. That's five times the cost of a half-decent Samsung Galaxy (S4 or S4 Mini, not network-locked), where I'm from.

    And for 1GHz, 1Gb RAM, 0.5Gb storage. That's not even close to the spec of the above Samsung.

    Pay five times the cost, get less back, and the possibility of component shortage making repair/replacement impossible.

    How do this stack up against the $9 CHIP project, etc. with its processor? I can build a GSM "phone" with Wifi, SD, touchscreen etc. from Arduino shields for way, way, way less than this costs on top of that.

    I mean, for God's sake, they've bothered to put IrDA and FM radio on it!

    Niche doesn't even begin to cover it. When you're more expensive than Apple, and can't do anywhere near as much, you know that you're onto a loser.

    1. Re: Cost by rakshat · · Score: 2

      Yes the cost is expensive but I like the concept. Still have my free runner and N900. Now I can upgrade still have a form factor, keyboard and screen I like. On a larger 2nd run costs can drop and others can pick up the same idea. BTW I have known web servers to running on the free runner ( only as demo concepts)

    2. Re:Cost by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0

      Compare to the Specs on the OnePlus One. And that makes it three times the price of a phone with much better specs, even if it isn't 100% open. The Neo900 is a phone for Tin Foil Hat wearers and unwashed grey beards living in mom's basement. And if you are that paranoid, you probably aren't going to have any phone.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Cost by ledow · · Score: 2

      But... the main communications chip still has a closed source firmware. So, actually.. what's changed? Sure, you can turn the radio off but that kinda defeats the point of having a phone.

    4. Re:Cost by knocte · · Score: 3, Informative

      Where did you get that price from? In the online shops it says the full phone is 480 EUR: https://my.neo900.org/index.ph...

    5. Re:Cost by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      The point is that the modem chip, even when on, has no access to the phone's memory. It's an external device.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    6. Re:Cost by ledow · · Score: 1

      FAQ page. Store was dead in seconds of the Slashdot posting.

    7. Re:Cost by ledow · · Score: 1

      Much like any GSM development board, then.

      So what's "free" about it besides an output pin to push the GSM chip into reset mode?

    8. Re:Cost by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      If it's sufficiently isolated from the rest of the hardware (so that it can't snoop on RAM or anything like that, so it can't override any firewall, and so that when the OS says it's off it's off), that's good enough for me. If the modem can't access any data I don't want it to have in the first place, then I don't have to worry about what it's doing with it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modem isolation is the point; if modems aren't isolated they can read/write to the main processor's memory. Having it implemented as a device that can't DMA is a vast improvement from a privacy/security standpoint, and few devices do so.

      http://www.replicant.us/freedom-privacy-security-issues.php

    10. Re:Cost by ledow · · Score: 2

      P.S. Your link clearly says "DOWN PAYMENT". That means not full payment for the device.

    11. Re:Cost by davydagger · · Score: 1

      the pre-order is for 350 EURO which is under $400 USD at current exchange rates.

    12. Re:Cost by wick3t · · Score: 4, Informative

      "According to current calculations, the cost of the motherboard should be somewhere around 990 EUR. The cost should go down as more people place pre-orders. The complete device will cost about 150 EUR more, depending on prices and availability of N900 spare parts."

      Holy cow, freedom (at least partial freedom) comes at a seriously hefty price. That's five times the cost of a half-decent Samsung Galaxy (S4 or S4 Mini, not network-locked), where I'm from.

      That's what it costs when you are unable to mass produce. The cost estimate is based on the production of 500 devices only which in turn was based on the number of donations over 100 EUR. The Neo900 is as close to freedom and privacy as you're going to get at this moment in time. If you're comparing this to a Samsung Galaxy then it looks like you don't understand the reasons for why the Neo900 is being built.

      And for 1GHz, 1Gb RAM, 0.5Gb storage. That's not even close to the spec of the above Samsung.

      You are incorrect on the 0.5GB storage. The Neo900 will be at least as feature complete as the N900. This means that it will have at least 32GB eMMC storage plus mircoSD expansion. Otherwise it will have 64GB if they are able to source the part. The 512MB refers to the SoC's NAND (double that of the original N900).

      Pay five times the cost, get less back, and the possibility of component shortage making repair/replacement impossible.

      The cost estimation page (which you appear to have read) indicates that they have considered failure rate and will be sourcing additional components to account for repair/replacement. This contributes to the overall cost of the device.

      How do this stack up against the $9 CHIP project, etc. with its processor? I can build a GSM "phone" with Wifi, SD, touchscreen etc. from Arduino shields for way, way, way less than this costs on top of that.

      I'd love to see you do that. I'll be the first in line to purchase one.

      I mean, for God's sake, they've bothered to put IrDA and FM radio on it!

      These are available on the original N900 and I still find them incredibly useful. To remove these would be a regression.

      Niche doesn't even begin to cover it. When you're more expensive than Apple, and can't do anywhere near as much, you know that you're onto a loser.

      Can't do nearly as much? Are you serious? I'm still using my N900 from 2009 because they is no other mobile phone available that what the N900 can do. Basically it's a full Linux computer in your pocket with a hardware keyboard and stylus for precision. I even have it dual booting with Debian.

      Go and buy an Apple if you feel it's appropriate to compare it to one but please stop spreading misinformation on stuff that you are not interested in.

      It's no wonder I rarely visit Slashdot these days posts such as yours get modded +5 Insightful.

    13. Re: Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an N900, Freerunner, and a Neo1973. Best wishes for the Neo900 folks but I'm holding on to my dollars this time.

    14. Re:Cost by ledow · · Score: 1

      Down-payment.

    15. Re:Cost by dos1 · · Score: 1

      0.5Gb storage? It's rather 64.5 Gb - read more carefully.

      Of course you can build a "phone" from Arduino shields or other stuff like that. That will be great learning experience and really fun thing to do - I guarantee! But it won't be more than a toy - the aspect of power management alone is a hard topic and you can't expect your phone toy to behave reasonably well there.

      This project is not for you, I get it. However, from other point of view, Apple devices can't do anywhere near as much as devices like Neo Freerunner, GTA04 or Neo900 - or heck, even plain N900. I'm not interested in iPhone at all, Android or FirefoxOS devices aren't attractive to me either. For me, the choice is limited - it's either Jolla, or Neo900 - and Neo900 wins for me on both openness and form factor.

      And the price? It's just how much things like that cost. If you build a device for a few hundreds of hobbyists, FOSS believers and generally other people similar to you, you cannot benefit from economy of scale. But that's fine. As long as there's someone working on it, and not just a bunch of people wishing that someone would, it's heading in the right direction :)

    16. Re: Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a few N900s, two Neo Freerunners and GTA04. And I'm totally hyped for Neo900.

      I waited very long for a next step in the only one device family out there that really has the openness and user's full control over their device in mind.

    17. Re:Cost by dos1 · · Score: 1
    18. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      three times the price

      living in mom's basement

      Rhetoric fail - if you can afford this thing, you're not living in mom's basement.

    19. Re:Cost by ledow · · Score: 0

      0.5Gb internal storage. The Galaxy phone I point at can put a microSD in too - it's not quite the same as saying that it's got that as primary internal storage. And that Galaxy has 1Gb internal storage. My point is that YOU pay for the microSD. The device INCLUDE the internal storage in the price. And you get less with this device, for more cost.

      And again, my point is cost. If you can get off-the-shelf components to do something similar for VASTLY reduced prices, then you have to wonder what you're paying for. If you can get a Samsung phone - with roughly the same makeup and components for 1/5th the price, and if you can build stuff with similar chips for similar purposes (even including LCD touchscreens, etc.) that use open-standards to communicate and no "hidden firmware" for a pittance - again, what are you PAYING for with this device?

      This isn't how much things like this cost, clearly. Maybe the BOARD is more expensive, as it's custom. Maybe a PARTICULAR screen is more expensive as it's in limited supply. But the overall device? It's a bog-standard phone. Quite what "unfree" firmware does a commercial device like a Galaxy have once you've rooted the Android install on it? Pretty much the same as this device - the GSM chip will have a proprietary firmware to ensure radio compliance.

      And if not, how much would it cost to replace, say, the GPS functionality on the Samsung with an "open" replacement? Again, nowhere NEAR the cost of this device (which is basically doing something similar by relying on the manufacturing for a previous device to provide the baseline).

      In runs of one and tens, yes, maybe this price is reasonable. In runs of 100's and 1000's - no.. it's really not. Not in the age of ubiquitous fast low-power common-bus chips for all these functions.

      This reminds me of the open-graphics-card initiatives. The time spent on starting from scratch (and inevitably relying on some closed piece of hardware at the end anyway) means that by the time it comes along few are interested, the costs are enormous, the parts are hard to obtain and the device quickly becomes obsolete (the project that springs to mind was still advertising PCI-only functionality just a year ago, not even PCIe). And it's based on FGPA's that you have to buy from a commercial vendor that doesn't publish their designs...

      I'm a purchaser of niche products. I have a GP2X and some of its predecessors and successors, I programmed for it, it was built in tiny runs, cost more than equivalents, and was quickly obsoleted by commercial devices but it was "open" - it was ARM chips with a Linux install that you could code down to the bootloader.

      5 times the cost of a (pretty expensive) commercial device that does the same and has the support of a major international company is a lot to ask for a niche product that doesn't do anything "special" (any Android machine, by definition, could run a plain Linux install if you so wanted to do that), is reliant on finding parts from old phones, and needs a tiny production run meaning you probably can never get the parts for it again if it goes wrong.

      I'm not against the idea, here. I'm against the execution. There are cheaper phones that have bog-standard hardware that you can replace any firmware with open-firmware if you needed to (or even the entire functionality of that particular feature with another free equivalent) and put them in a case. In fact, here, the case is the CHEAP part. That's the part you could easily redesign to shove any board taken from a phone into. The electronics for a hobby project, however, is never going to get near the cost, reliability, even safety of a commercial product re-purposed.

      The ideal isn't mine, particularly, but the execution seems incredibly poor is that's the closest you can get to price-point. Double-the-cost, maybe. FIVE TIMES is ludicrous.

    20. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's not true at all. Will I be able to easily install the OS that I want (Debian/Arch/Gentoo) on a Samgung galaxy? on an iBad? this project is not for normal users, this is for people who want to push the technology forward, to have the full power in their hands, not in the hand of some corporation. I still use my N900 as my main "phone"(as a mobile computer, I don't use GSM), and it's the best phone.... still. so, now the neo900 will be the best phone ;)

    21. Re:Cost by ledow · · Score: 1

      Erm.... yes?

      www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPjrRNlTmPU

      A quick Google just now shows that just about any Samsung device from the Galaxy Fit to the Ace to the main phones has ALREADY had some distro retro-fitted to it. Android IS Linux, it's just that the interface isn't Gnome or KDE and the application format isn't ELF binary but Dalvik etc.

      It's just an ARM device. As such, running a mainstream distro on a Galaxy device is probably orders of magnitude EASIER than pissing about trying to build a board that fits into an old case... and gives you the same result if you bother to tinker with it (or if there's a single project in the world that's already tinkered with it for you to customise to phone).

      In the same way, I can emulate almost any Android phone with VirtualBox etc. setups on my PC - they are just standard ARM Linux devices at the end of the day.

      The iPad? I'm completely anti-apple but there's no reason why not, but I imagine it would be much harder work.

      But running a Linux distro on a Samsung phone?

      1) You already are, it's just been pared back to the phone basics.
      2) Yes, you can already do exactly that.

      One Google it took and DOZENS of projects popped up that have done exactly that.

    22. Re:Cost by dos1 · · Score: 1

      No, read carefully and don't spread false info! There's 64GB of *internal* eMMC, plus 0.5GB of internal NAND (mostly for N900 compatibility), AND additional external microSD memory.

      If you say that Neo900 "doesn't do anything special" compared to any Android phone, you surely just don't understand what this fuzz is all about. Almost any Android phone out there is hardly comparable to a openness level of devices like Neo Freerunner, GTA04 or Neo900. The best you can get from Android devices is Replicant or some libhybris abominations, and after using Freerunner and N900 for a long time I'm not exactly interested in either.

      The price is simply how development of such things divided by low production yield costs. It's as simple as that. When you're comparing something developed with external funds for a order of magnitude more people, then prices drop *very quick*.

      Also, obviously you cannot "take Samsung and replace GPS to more open one". Those devices both lack basic info about what's really inside and how it's connected, reworking is *very* error prone (and producing it means REing it from scratch, which would be even more expensive than Neo900 which already used GTA04 design for some of its parts), they're not FLOSS friendly, the architecture of GSM communication often isn't even privacy friendly... heck, today even finding a device with physical keyboard would be a trouble. Your ideas are simply disconnected from reality. That's not how you make devices, especially not for such a niche as this one.

      That's the level of openness and transparency that is the basic requirement of this project that differentiates it from other ones: http://neo900.org/stuff/block-...

      Also, the project's take on user privacy and how a modem module will be handled is very unique: http://neo900.org/stuff/ohsw20...

      And that's just early stuff. Good luck finding any other suiting phone for someone for whom this stuff is important.

      "The execution" of Neo900 is a result of years of experience with real open devices like those from Openmoko and OpenPhoenux community, both as their users and makers. There's hardly any comparable hardware on the market - and virtually none that is "much cheaper", as you postulate. The closest one right now is Jolla, which is still a few steps backwards compared to what Openmoko already did years ago.

    23. Re:Cost by dos1 · · Score: 1

      >it would be much harder work

      Yes, of course, you can fight your own device to just make it behave in the way you want it to.
      However, you can also get a device that's *made* to behave in the way you want it to.

      I've had my share of working on various OS ports for mobile devices. It's never ending cat-and-mouse play. I've had enough.

    24. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      three times the price

      living in mom's basement

      Rhetoric fail - if you can afford this thing, you're not living in mom's basement.

      Mom doesn't charge me rent on the basement. That is how I can afford this thing. She does my laundry, too!

  8. Price by BobSwi · · Score: 2

    Seems the site was slashdotted, the price is around $1000 EU though from what I've read on http://talk.maemo.org/

    1. Re:Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $1000 EU

      What's a $EU?

      Is that like a monopoly version of a €?

    2. Re:Price by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Some of the sites came up for me, looks like the fully assembled down payment is 480€. I'm not sure what that means for the full price, though.

    3. Re:Price by CastrTroy · · Score: 0

      Even 480 Euros ($533 US) is an insane price to ask for a phone. Especially one that currently has zero apps. I just got a Windows Phone (Blu Win HD LTE) which is currently priced at $200 US and I find it to be an amazing phone. Windows Phone is quite a good OS, and it's due for an update to Windows 10 when it comes out. Open source may be a nice idea, but I don't think a lot of people are going to want to pay that kind of premuim just to get it. I think the days of $500+ phones are numbered. I still don't know how people justify the $650+ price tag of the iPhone.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Price by T-Bone_142 · · Score: 1

      I don't think that anyone willing to have a windows phone is part of the target demographic for this device.

      --
      "In Soviet America, Passport Stamps You!"
    5. Re: Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if it's compatible with the n900 it probably has more usable programs than a Windows phone. Given that it has a keyboard and a full linux stack. One of the reasons that it does is that anything open source can be compiled for it. I've still got a Zaurus and compared to any phone including the sliders it had a better layout for doing work.

    6. Re:Price by asylumx · · Score: 1

      I personally have a Windows phone and I agree about that being a decent phone OS but i'm not sure what that has to do with anything here. $533 US is quite reasonable compared to many smartphones in the US and remember that electronics in Europe cost significantly more than they do in the US for whatever reason -- so if it sells for 480€ it will probably sell for closer to $400 US, assuming it even comes here. Maybe you and I wouldn't spend that much on a phone, but it's been proven time and time again that a lot of people will.

  9. FAQ by gQuigs · · Score: 2

    https://web.archive.org/web/20...

    Might be slightly out of date..

    1. Re:FAQ by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Informative

      It has a resistive touchscreen. What's more they're saying they're going for resistive because it's "more accurate" than capacitive and capacitive would be a "step back."

      I had a Nokia N800 so am familiar with the history of this platform, but it always felt like a prototype to me, and it seems like the Neo900 is still a prototype of something that would have been released ten years ago. What a shame.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, no thanks.

      Buying this phone is like going a step back. At least the OnePlus One tried to make a better phone overall, actually looks nice and can compete with the big guys.

    3. Re:FAQ by m4rtink · · Score: 1

      It has a resistive touchscreen. What's more they're saying they're going for resistive because it's "more accurate" than capacitive and capacitive would be a "step back."

      Seems like you never used the N900 touchscreen - it not like the cheap resistive screens on low end phones, but a high quality one. It is just as usable as a capacitive screen for touch and can be used for *very precise* pointing. That's one of the reasons people have been using their N900s for drawing pictures and maps. Try to do that with a normal capacitive screen - it's like trying to draw in boxing gloves.

    4. Re:FAQ by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Try to do that with a normal capacitive screen - it's like trying to draw in boxing gloves.

      Never heard of this thing called a "Surface Pro". It has a capacitive screen and people draw stuff on it all the time.

    5. Re:FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strictly speaking, it is more accurate as to touch pressure detection. But that doesn't necessarily make it more desirable.

    6. Re:FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't. It has a Wacom stylus -- something older than even resistive screens.

      So much misinformation and FUD for resistive screens.

    7. Re:FAQ by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      It doesn't. It has a Wacom stylus -- something older than even resistive screens.

      Umm, yes it does. Just because the screen had a Wacom digitizer layer doesn't change the fact that the screen itself is capacitive.

    8. Re:FAQ by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      1. Does touch work, or is a stylus in practice mandatory?
      2. Does multi-touch work?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    9. Re:FAQ by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify my ultimate point, being able to draw does not require a resistive screen. A capacitive screen with an active digitizer is plenty to get the job done.

    10. Re:FAQ by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      The screen is going to work just like the N900 did. So, yes, there is touch but not multitouch.

    11. Re:FAQ by dos1 · · Score: 1

      There will be a limited multitouch (dualtouch gestures) support in Neo900 thanks to CRTOUCH chip: https://www.freescale.com/weba...

    12. Re:FAQ by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Then I stand corrected. :)

    13. Re:FAQ by dos1 · · Score: 1

      Capacitive screens are still annoying to use and Wacom layer requires additional stylus to make your input more accurate. On my N900, I can pretty accurately select 8px text just with side of my fingernail, plus it doesn't register accidental presses as soon as I make a skin contact with the screen - and those are killer features for me.

    14. Re:FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is also more accurate with regard to touch positioning. This can be more desirable (depending on your preferences and use cases) especially on a smaller screen.

    15. Re:FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But all this "draw over the screen" stuff is done using the Wacom layer, not the capacitive one, because it is uselessly imprecise for that.

    16. Re:FAQ by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Of which I never said otherwise. Of course it uses the active digitizer to get the pressure sensitivity, etc. But the screen is ultimately still capacitive.

    17. Re:FAQ by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I'm going to be honest, the more I read this discussion, the move I'm thrown back to old "debates" between advocates of rear projection and plasma TVs, and LCDs, all bemoaning the rise of the latter against such superior technologies as a TV that can only be viewed from one angle (and then not all at the same time), or a TV that requires all 4:3 content be shown in stretch-o-vision to avoid temporary burn-in issues. "But LCDs have a tiny bit of light visible when they're supposed to be black!" screams the videophiles, apparently oblivious to the fact that normal people rarely watch TV in rooms with no ambient light.

      The resistive screen they're describing is clearly inferior to capacitive when applied to real world applications. Nobody in their right mind uses their cellphone to "paint" pictures. But everyone uses it to dial numbers, browse websites, and other activities that require a finger, or two, rather than a stylus.

      But, hey, for the 0.01% of users who do actually use their cellphones more as an easel than a phone, I guess it might be useful.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    18. Re:FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No -- it uses the wacom layer to get _anything_ including the position of the stylus itself. The _only_ used hardware while drawing is the wacom layer -- the capacitive layer is completely unused (and useless).

      Why do you even keep the capacitive layer at this point? Why do you say the screen is "ultimately still capacitive" when the capacitive layer is completely useless here?

      Think of a resistive screen as a high-precision screen (unlike capacitive) that is actually able to detect actual pressure (unlike capacitive) and usable with anything including human fingers, wacom and plain plastic styli (unlike capacitive).

    19. Re:FAQ by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Nobody in their right mind uses their cellphone to "paint" pictures. But everyone uses it to dial numbers, browse websites, and other activities that require a finger, or two, rather than a stylus.

      Fingers work perfectly well on the n900 resistive screen.

      The neo900 should be better (dual-touch).

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    20. Re:FAQ by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      From what people are writing here, there are multiple definitions of "perfectly well". Someone in an above thread complains that capacitive screens require only the lightest touch, ensuring that they make mistakes when trying to use their fingernail to accurately press a specific pixel.

      That, to me, says that the N900 and Neo900 do not have "touch" sensitive displays, they require pressure. I'm finding it improbable (and I'm willing to be proven wrong, but I'm increasingly sceptical as this videophilesque discussion continues) that the usual range of gestures we've come to know and, yes, love, are going to work nearly as well on that type of screen.

      If I'm wrong and a light tap will always work, and a swipe will never be broken up into multiple gestures or ignored altogether, and so on, then I'd be delighted, albeit surprised the technology isn't being used anywhere else.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    21. Re:FAQ by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      If I'm wrong and a light tap will always work, and a swipe will never be broken up into multiple gestures or ignored altogether, and so on, then I'd be delighted, albeit surprised the technology isn't being used anywhere else.

      The N900 does have a stylus, but, personally, I only used it for non-mobile versions of some websites or running X programs that weren't written for touch screens.

      Probably the reason the technology is not used elsewhere is that the screen is pretty fragile -- it's plastic, not glass, and soft plastic at that. Scratches do build up, and screen protectors do reduce sensitivity.

      Also the N900 is single touch -- the dual touch "magic" didn't exist when the N900 was made.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  10. Re:Shitty freetarded phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I work for an ARMv8 vendor, it's not really all that great to have 64-bit. Mostly it's a big waste of money to put one in a phone.

  11. Hmm by koan · · Score: 1

    The truly open smartphone
    that cares about your privacy

    Pretty sure inanimate objects don't have "cares", but is it odd I like the fact it has real buttons?

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Hmm by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Real buttons is why I am using a Nokia E90 communicator instead of something newer.

    2. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story, gramps.

    3. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That and you need a way to protect your virginity. Wouldn't want females thinking you're sane or anything.

    4. Re:Hmm by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      An E90 is pretty good for protecting anything -- it's one of those phones that double as a PDW.

      The N900/Neo900 keyboard is not as good as the E90, but it's about the 2nd best phone keyboard.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  12. The name reminds me of something else by Snorlax · · Score: 1
  13. New buggy whip! by Moof123 · · Score: 1

    Get the latest horse and buggy whip! Now with graphene and gold nano-particles!

    1. Re:New buggy whip! by virens · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is worse: it is just a crappy board with shitty screen and stock Debian on top. And THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is going to cost you at lest 500 Euro!

    2. Re:New buggy whip! by m4rtink · · Score: 1

      And how many open source smartphones did *you* build ? :P

    3. Re:New buggy whip! by xvan · · Score: 1

      900 Euro... And you are right, it's a crappy board with shitty screen and stock Debian on top. BUT, there is no better offer in the market for that niche... The closest one is Jolla, I think.

  14. Re:Shitty freetarded phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't say anything about 64-bit. ARMv8 brings about a much cleaner architecture, power improvements, etc.

  15. Re:Shitty freetarded phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You work for an "ARMv8 vendor" and yet think the only benefit of ARMv8 is 64-bit? Do you know nothing at all about all the other architectural improvements and the fact that the newer ARMv8 cores run faster with less power draw? Even in 32-bit mode they still run faster and cooler than Cortex-A8s.

  16. Hardly "Open" or Free Software Friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The device is dependent on a non-free graphics chip and wifi. I'm a bit sceptical of the value of a device which claims enhanced privacy when they completely discard major issues. If you don't even know what your running on the main CPU how can you claim to have enhanced security by being able to turn off the GSM modem? I like the idea of being able to turn the GSM modem off. That is definitely a good thing. Before I'd even consider this phone (there are more free software friendly phones out there already actually) I'd want them to have at least produced a distribution or version of a distribution without the non-free pieces. That way I'd at least know that its unlikely anything is spying on me (other than tracking when the phone is on). I'm also assuming here the GSM modem doesn't have access to the CPU, ram, or flash on the device. If it does then all bets are off as I can't trust the GSM modem to not grab my encryption key, contacts, etc and send them off to the NSA.

    1. Re:Hardly "Open" or Free Software Friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are more free software friendly phones out there already actually

      Like?

    2. Re:Hardly "Open" or Free Software Friendly by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      'd want them to have at least produced a distribution or version of a distribution without the non-free pieces. That way I'd at least know that its unlikely anything is spying on me (other than tracking when the phone is on).

      You can, AFAIK, do non-accelarated graphics with no closed code. Don't know about WIFI.

      I'm also assuming here the GSM modem doesn't have access to the CPU, ram, or flash on the device.

      Your assumption is correct.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    3. Re:Hardly "Open" or Free Software Friendly by jonwil · · Score: 1

      As far as I know there is no closed source code required on the main CPU to use the WiFi chip, the only thing you absolutely HAVE to have for WiFi to work is a firmware blob downloaded to the chip itself.

  17. Free Idle Death Threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if Joerg and crew will also include a free idle death threat, targeted at whatever object of hate you desire. Maybe they'll resort to their default of "hiring a hitman to kill Poettering" unless otherwise specified.

    1. Re:Free Idle Death Threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That meme is hilarious. Poettering finding some random joke from a "funny channel guy" a death threat, always makes me smile :)

  18. Nokia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wasn't aware that Nokia still makes cell phones. I haven't seen a Nokia flip phone since like 2005. It seems that everybody has a Samsung Galaxy an Apple Iphone or LG smartphone these days. Just making an observation. I need to take a look at the latest Nokia phones at Best Buy. :D

  19. Re:What an absolute waste of resources and money by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    Just like /.

    You're point?

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  20. Re:Shitty freetarded phone by ananamouse · · Score: 2

    A GPS location will fit in a 64 bit word. Phones do that a lot. Phones these days, I still use a flipper from the last decade.

  21. It. Will. Fail. Period by virens · · Score: 0

    Haven't we learned anything from, oh I don't know, Neo Free Runner? Ubuntu Phone anyone? Apparently, we did not. These are spectacular failures, and RTFA just brought us another one.
    First, the price is ridiculous: they say 480 Euro for complete device. I look at my Google Nexus 5 and I'm telling you: even if this piece of crap will be able to run Android apps (which I doubt), it does not justify the pricetag. Especially considering its laughable specs - I mean, c'mon, atrocious 3.5 screen and 0.5Gb storage?!
    The problem is worse: there is Linux on it. What are you talking about? Which software I could use on a phone? What, GIMP?! Kate?! Full-blown Firefox? I don't care what OS is inside, frankly - I want a working phone, with fscking software in it. And opensource does not provide it - not one bit. It will be glitchy and buggy mess, as always, and I don't want it. I use Debian on desktop, and it is OK (finally, in 2015) - but on mobile? You've got to be kidding me...
    Bottom line: I'm willing to bet on 50 bucks that this piece of crap will not gain even 0.5 marketshare in 5 years from now - if any.

    1. Re:It. Will. Fail. Period by dos1 · · Score: 1

      I'm still using my Openmoko Neo Freerunner and my Nokia N900.

      I love the form factor of N900.
      I love complete freedom over the software of Neo Freerunner.
      I love the resistive screen of N900.
      I love the fact that I run full GNU/Linux on my phones - came handy in lots of cases already.

      I love tinkering with these phones. I got Freerunner as a late teenager - it was worth the investment. I gained a lot of knowledge just by playing with that phone.

      So in future I will use Neo900, as any other device would be a downgrade for me. You won't - and it's fine. It's not for people like you. It's for people like me.

      Your mention of "0.5GB storage" is a FUD BTW. Neo900 has 64GB + 512MB of NAND.

    2. Re:It. Will. Fail. Period by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you don't think there are 500 people who are willing to buy this? Because they are doing such a small production run is part of the reason it is so expensive. But so long as the fulfil all the orders they take I don't think it is fair to call this a failure. It was always going to be a niche product.

    3. Re:It. Will. Fail. Period by alantus · · Score: 1

      You are ranting about something that you have no idea about.

      480 Euro? More like 900+.
      0.5 Gb storage? That is just NAND, on top of that you have MMC and microSD.
      You can play freeciv while on the train, then rsync saved games to continue playing on your PC.
      Its basically a Debian tablet with phone capabilities and real keyboard.

    4. Re:It. Will. Fail. Period by AntiSol · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet on 50 bucks that this piece of crap will not gain even 0.5 marketshare in 5 years from now - if any.

      I find it funny and sad how many people talk about how it will fail because it "wont find marketshare". This assertion demonstrates your complete lack of any understanding of what it is.

      I assume that by "0.5 marketshare" you mean 0.5 percent? for that they'd have to produce more than a couple of hundred of devices. So, yeah, it's unlikely to ever get "0.5 marketshare". Which obviously means its a failure, because everybody wants marketshare, right?

      Go back to drooling over your iphone, pawn, and just hope nobody's watching while you jerk off over apple's marketshare.

  22. Neo9 by ThePangolino · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting on that one.

    --
    My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.
  23. Re:What an absolute waste of resources and money by hawguy · · Score: 1

    What an absolute waste of resources and money.

    Do you consider everything that you don't want to be a waste of resources and money? Does the existence of this project deprive you of something that *you* need? Do you assume that the developers would work on your pet project if they weren't working on this? Do you think that the money that people are investing in this would somehow benefit you if it weren't spent on this project?

  24. Re:Shitty freetarded phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Take it easy on the guy. He didn't say 64 bit was the only benefit. Actually, he said the xact opposite. He probably assumed you saw the downside of paying $1,000 for a 5 year old rebranded n900. Of course, freedom isn't free. Some will pony up the cash for the privilege of carrying the flag. Let's just thank these people for their service and be glad the blackberry crowd isn't too riled up. Personally, I can't wait till Nokia gets back into the game. Their shareholders will fund ANYTHING.

  25. enlightenyourself by justifythis1 · · Score: 1

    The best suggestion is to become enlightened on the topic .. all around too. Not just on the specs. Not just on the open qualities. Not just on it's security. Nor the potential to run whatever platform can be crammed into it. Nor it's longevity (which should be a decade+) for arguments sake.. for the moment let's look at the price. If half of you here "actually" read past the 1st sentence. the price is not fixed. it is the extreme estimate with minimal customer orders. expect the price to drop when orders climb. There are for this particular run a specific maximum set number of devices which can be created.. which is dependent mainly upon the availability of the number of n900 housings which can be gotten for the boards estimated at roughly 2000 max. housings = a maximum possible 2000 neo900 devices to ship. (not counting those customers with their own n900's to cannibalize to put a neo900 board into..) Future runs ..future neo910 (?) models would be based upon newly designed housings. So jump on board or not. Wait too long and you may not have an option.

    1. Re:enlightenyourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have several N900s I could cannibalise, but even the initial payment they are asking for is too much for what it is, I would maybe pay £300 for the motherboard (and required spacer) they are offering, but they are asking more than that to start with.

      If they do a future version with reasonably up-to-date internals, and a bigger and better screen, then I might consider up to £600 for that package. It would be hard to justify paying that much for something I don't really need, but I do like the idea enough I probably would, but beyond that price it just isn't worth it, at least to me.

  26. Re:What an absolute waste of resources and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They took too long to develop it. Now that they are finally coming out with it, it's pretty crusty hardware already. Yeah, the original N900 was a popular nerd phone back in the day, but it's already over half a decade old product.

  27. I Agree. Don't Anthropomorphize Objects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They hate it when you do that!

  28. Re:What an absolute waste of resources and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're (the right usage of "you're") post invalidated the first half of your sig.

  29. People who say "this is crap" don't have a clue by jonwil · · Score: 3, Informative

    People who say "this is crap because I can buy a Nexus or Galaxy or android-device-of-the-month for far less money" don't have a clue about what the Neo900 is or why its nothing like the Nexus or Galaxy or other Android devices.

    Things the Neo900 has that NONE of the current high-end Android devices (the things most people are going to be comparing the Neo900 to) have:
    Physical hardware keyboard (there are still people like me who love physical keyboards and wont buy a phone without one)

    Hardware enforced separation between the modem and the main CPU (this means that the rumors that the NSA can listen to you via your cellphone microphone are definatly NOT going to happen on a Neo900)

    No closed blobs for the cellular radio on the main CPU side (pretty much all "open" android ROMs still require a closed-source radio library specific to the radio in your particular Android device. The Neo900 will have a 100% open source library to talk to the cellular radio module)

    No closed blobs on the main CPU side for WiFi, bluetooth, NFC, audio, touch screen, camera, GPS or sensors (unlike even the Google Nexus phones which require closed blobs for many pieces of hardware)

    Full schematics and hardware documentation available (show me a high-end phone where you can get THAT)

    The Neo900 isn't meant to be a competitor to the Samsung Galaxy or Apple iPhone or Google Nexus. Its meant to be a phone for people who care about their privacy and want a device where they control all the software running on the main CPU and can be sure none of the other CPUs in the device have access to the main CPU/RAM/storage or to hardware like the microphone. And a phone for hardware geeks who want a hackable device and one THEY control and not some carrier or OEM (there are phones where the bootloader started out unlocked and was then locked by an OTA update)

    Its got LTE, 802.11a/b/g/n WiFi and bluetooth 4.0 low energy for fast speeds and the ability to talk to other devices.

    The 3 modem options available mean its compatible with many carriers all over the world.

    1. Re:People who say "this is crap" don't have a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where they control all the software running on the main CPU and can be sure none of the other CPUs in the device have access to the main CPU/RAM/storage or to hardware like the microphone

      Dude your neckbeard is showing. You are ridiculous.

    2. Re:People who say "this is crap" don't have a clue by dave420 · · Score: 1

      For most people those points simply don't matter. For them, this phone is crap, as it costs a lot and isn't as capable in various aspects as cheaper, more popular phones. I appreciate that some users will find this phone appealing, but we shouldn't assume they represent anything more than statistical noise when it comes to phone users.

    3. Re:People who say "this is crap" don't have a clue by dos1 · · Score: 1

      This project isn't for most people. It's specifically for people who think those points matter.

    4. Re:People who say "this is crap" don't have a clue by flacco · · Score: 1

      > You are ridiculous.

      Not really.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    5. Re:People who say "this is crap" don't have a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we also shouldn't assume that all phones need to appeal to the mass market rather than a niche like this. The mass market can buy mass market phones.

      About the only downsides to this, for the target market, are the high upfront cost and the question of whether it will continue to have software support in the long term.

  30. The unfortunate thing by cnj · · Score: 1

    I loved my N900, and still have it despite the flaky USB port and the amount of battery it chugs, the fact that Maemo wasn't as free as you'd hoped and that it was supported by Nokia about as well as Nokia supported anything. Because of that, I've been watching the Neo900 project for quite some time, although I'll admit it wasn't until today that I payed closer attention to the frequency options (since they were always subject to change anyway).

    There isn't a good world phone option. Given the chips they're working with, the world options (Euro LTE or penta-band UMTS) won't work with T-Mobile USA's UMTS or LTE networks [as far as I can map support and bands?], and the US version won't work at all in Japan. Compare that to other pentaband phones which drop the 800MHz for the AWS band, which work worldwide.

    Off-topic, but does anyone click on any of the "Video" stories, or is that like the real-estate used for the Dice ads?
    For those wholly confused by what this is, it's not intended at all as a competitor for Android or iOS based devices, it exists for its own reasons. A car analogy (do users here still ask for those? Or here do car analogies ask for users?): telling someone looking to get an Neo900 to get an Apple iPhone or Samsung Galaxy would be like telling someone to get a Ferrari 458 or Lamborghini Huracan rather than a Rolls Royce Phantom. Sure, the Ferrari and Lamborghini are cheaper, faster, and more likely to be on the poster in your room; but someone wanting to buy the Rolls isn't going to be impressed by that.

    --
    Never trust anyone over 90000.
    1. Re:The unfortunate thing by alantus · · Score: 1

      I was also watching the Neo900 project for a while, but they made some bad decisions.
      It's too expensive because they didn't want to compromise on anything, and they decided to add a separator will make a thick phone even thicker.
      I would have bought it if the price was around 400 euro and it didn't need a separator.
      Now I'm placing my bets on the Pyra

    2. Re: The unfortunate thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you think this is comparable to a Rolls Royce in your analogy, you're out of your mind. This is more like expecting someone to pay twice as much for a 1977 Chevy Caprice than a brand new BMW M5 because "at least you can work on the Chevy yourself without none of them computer doodads." Sure, there's some value in being able to wrench on your own car, but at what point does paying extra for that beat out something that outperforms what you're buying by every other conceivable metric?

    3. Re: The unfortunate thing by cnj · · Score: 1

      > but at what point does paying extra for that beat out something that outperforms what you're buying by every other conceivable metric?

      It's a tough but personal call, I guess. Given the earlier metaphor, I'd much rather have the Maybach which is priced similarly to the sports cars, but since there's no Maybach option for the Neo900 that's where we're at. I think I paid about $700 for the first N900, later getting them for $300 for my father and sister (who are both still using them); so ~$1000 for the Neo900 is tempting to have a pocket Debian box with all the gadgets, and presumably, a community like Maemo had that was keen to hop in and hack it.

      I'm a little bummed since the last time I was a looking to spend $1000 on a phone it was (now I can't remember, either a Siemens or a Motorola) phone that could do UMTS and quad-band GSM, meaning I would have been able to use the same phone in the US, Europe and Japan.

      If I thought a better option would come along if I waited another year, or even two, this would be a more obvious solution. Given that I don't replace phones every two years, maybe the amortized cost is worth it. I'm obviously still tempted, although with 5G deployments *scheduled* for 2020 maybe it's not worth it. Or it'll simply be a good time to look to upgrade. I'm very conflicted.

      --
      Never trust anyone over 90000.
    4. Re: The unfortunate thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly, nothing appears in their store anymore, so maybe they hit their limit and called it a day, and my decision has been made for me?

      Or they're dealing with the overload of the pre-announced leak, and it'll be back (the donate page would indicate as much).

  31. Board replacement... meh by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Motherboard replacements and case replacements will gain traction just like in the assemble your own PC era.

    Well not very likely.

    That did work for the openmoko because the neo 1973 and neo freerunner (i have one!) have been designed from the gound up with an open hardware approach.
    They have been designed to be easy to open, easy to hack, easy to replace parts.
    Thus upgrade kits like gta04 were likely.

    That does work now for the N900, because they are a little bit older generation, back at a time when case were a bit bulkier, battery was replaceable, etc.
    There are also a lot of them out in the wild. (Basically, for a long time the Maemo where *THE* definite platforms for geeks to go, N900 was the most popular, and there were only 2 others before).
    You could make a Neo900 upgrade kit that is more or less practical.

    That won't work with modern smartphones:
    - first they are absurdly compact and small (just to have a "better number" on the check list. not that it's actually usefull, specially when the end users will enclose them in an over-priced after-market case anyway).
    - they are often very hard to dissassamble (both because of the previous point, but also because it makes them more resistant to moisture etc. if they are in an enclosing never designed to be opened)
    - some don't even have removable batteries.
    - to make quick buck these companies tend to launch one new model every 6 months (yeah, imagine a replacement borad for iPhone. iPhones are popular, isn't it ? except that there are a dozen of them by now)
    - also most of these companies aren't targetting geeks in the first place (unlike nokia maemo platform) and thus aren't likely to be held by users actually able to use an upgrade kit.

    I suspect that the Jolla's sailfish phone is the only probable next target for an upgrade kit.

    But in general, the case is the least problematice in smart phones.
    It makes more sense to 3D print a new case around an existing board, rather than try to fit a new board inside an existing phone.

    Usually, the screen is the most complex, instead.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  32. windows 10 update and release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While Windows 10 launch, you can read all the news about windows 10 update here.