Slashdot Mirror


Ads Based On Browsing History Are Coming To All Firefox Users

An anonymous reader writes: Mozilla has announced plans to launch a feature called "Suggested Tiles," which will provide sponsored recommendations to visit certain websites when other websites show up in the user's new tab page. The tiles will begin to show up for beta channel users next week, and the company is asking for feedback. For testing purposes, users will only see Suggested Tiles "promoting Firefox for Android, Firefox Marketplace, and other Mozilla causes." It's not yet known what websites will show up on the tiles when the feature launches later this summer. The company says, "With Suggested Tiles, we want to show the world that it is possible to do relevant advertising and content recommendations while still respecting users’ privacy and giving them control over their data."

75 of 531 comments (clear)

  1. bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    good bye Firefox. last nail in the coffin. I wanted to like it. I did. I still dislike Chrome's UI and the fact Google owns it.

    Crap maybe I'll switch to Opera it's actually really really nice now as a UI.

    1. Re:bye by paskie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No vertical tabs 10 years after widescreen displays started spreading widely?

      Also (not so much about UI), if you have many open tabs, chrome eats much less CPU on the background, but is much more memory hungry.

      --
      It's not the fall that kills you. It's the sudden stop at the end. -Douglas Adams
    2. Re:bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a Firefox Nightly user, I've already had to deal with the spam tiles. The fix is to install a 3rd party speed dial.

      I use Super Start. It's nothing fancy, but it's clean and gets the job done.

    3. Re:bye by paskie · · Score: 2

      Oh and also the fact that middle click inside website does not load URL from clipboard. It works on a favicon - except in case of verified identity SSL servers, there's no favicon.

      About the tabs, frankly, for me (but clearly not just me) a more flexible paradigm which blends seamlessly the concept of tabs and bookmarks (and ideally full-text search over my "bookmarked tabs") would be awesome. I'm a pack-rat and would like to archive whole tab trees for later, see them among the other pages, but not take memory+CPU now. I think there's an actual and large market gap here.

      --
      It's not the fall that kills you. It's the sudden stop at the end. -Douglas Adams
    4. Re:bye by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2

      Chrome starts up for me a lot faster than Firefox and runs much smoother. Especially on those stupid forever scrolling pages. Yeah I know code should be efficient with memory but these days there is no excuse for having less than 4Gb. Times change. Plus Chrome uses html5 playback on Youtube and supports the higher framerates (50/60 fps).

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    5. Re: bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but in this case I have to ask, is there a clandestine effort underway to utterly destroy Firefox, and maybe even Mozilla, from the inside?

      It's like every decision made over the past several years has been designed to alienate Firefox's remaining users, without bringing in any new users.

      I'm talking of the unwanted UI changes. Then there were the release frequency changes that broke extensions every release for a long time. Then there were more unwanted UI changes, cumulating in the despised Australis UI. Then there was the switch to Yahoo for searches. There were the grid advertisements. Then there was the mandatory HTTPS proposal. Now there's this nonsense. All of this is being done when there are still many bugs to fix, some of them existing for years.

      It's just one bad thing after another, even when Firefox users loudly object, and even with Firefox's ever-dropping share of the market.

      I'd like to just blame it on ineptitude or incompetence, but these decisions are unbelievable, even in those cases. I just can't get over how obviously terrible so many of these decisions have been.

    6. Re:bye by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm a pack-rat and would like to archive whole tab trees for later, see them among the other pages, but not take memory+CPU now.

      It's funny how the mobile (Android) versions of both Chrome and Firefox already manage to do this -- I can have 50+ tabs going on my phone and not run out of memory, although some of them will reload when I switch back to them -- but the desktop versions don't.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:bye by paskie · · Score: 2

      I do use the memory, thank you very much. I just use the computer for something else than web browsing too. I do realize it's getting uncommon (and don't actually even get *that* grumpy about it, just have my different set of preferences).

      When you see a guy in sibling comment complaining "In addition, I hate the extremely long time for startup and new tab creation, which is accompanied by constant disk grinding." - well, that's exactly the memory problem, which now translates to bad user experience. As you suggested: The OS swapped it out as another app needed it.

      --
      It's not the fall that kills you. It's the sudden stop at the end. -Douglas Adams
    8. Re: bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have to remember, Mozilla isn't run by people who understand business. They are just a group of mediocre programmers with short attention spans and no experience.

      It's like programmer art. The programmer himself thinks it's pretty good, but any objective viewer will obviously be able to see that it's amateur at best and utter crap at worst.

    9. Re:bye by JMJimmy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've never understood comments about memory use. I buy my memory to use. If it is sitting empty, I paid for it for nothing. Apps should use it and use it freely for cache, etc. to speed up performance. I'd feel the same about CPU except that high CPU usage leads to thermal issues (fans on all the time, etc.). So I do prefer not to use all the CPU I paid for - but memory? Heck, the OS will swap it out if another app needs it.

      Tell that to Win8 when it starts complaining about low 32bit memory and minimizing/terminating your programs.

    10. Re:bye by Translation+Error · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Anyone who's a fan of Opera back when it was still innovative and highly configurable (way back in version 12) might want to keep an eye on Vivaldi, a browser being created by a number of people who left the Opera team after the change in focus. It's based on the Blink engine and the developers are working on incorporating many of the features of Opera 12. It still has a way to go, as it's currently still at the technical preview stage.

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    11. Re:bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      a little harsh when all you need to do is change preference in about:config:

      browser.newtab.url to about:blank

      done and done. the whole 'smart' newtab page is gone for good. that is one of the very nice things about firefox....... configurability..

    12. Re:bye by knightghost · · Score: 2

      Chrome is multi-threaded. Firefox is not. Firefox runs better on old systems, Chrome runs better on new ones.

      The minute Firefox switched to Yahoo/Micro$haft, it lost me. There's now no real independent browser.

    13. Re:bye by kav2k · · Score: 2

      A middle-click on the New Tab button works, assuming a Linux system.

      Otherwise, it's relatively easy to write an extension that does it.

    14. Re:bye by Corporate+Gadfly · · Score: 2, Informative

      No vertical tabs 10 years after widescreen displays started spreading widely?

      Tree Style Tabs

      --
      Corporate Gadfly
      Jonathan Archer: the most beaten up Enterprise captain in Star Trek history
    15. Re: bye by QuietLagoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...Just look at some of the self-entitled and abusive comments here on Slashdot....

      Those comments started out as constructive criticism. However, Mozilla pressed on with their determination to ignore and alienate users.

      .
      Now Mozilla is getting the criticism they have earned.

      Mozilla/Firefox has a problem. A big one. The first step in solving a problem is to identify its cause and not, as you attempt, to blame others for Mozilla's self-inflicted problems.

    16. Re:bye by Gort65 · · Score: 2

      So you have to cut out a major piece of browser functionality to remove the ads. Bravo.

      Hardly major. In fact, I personally find the silly boxes a hindrance rather than a help. Still, yeah, for others it might be beneficial to have your most visited sites there for you in pictorial form on a new tab, but I'd hardly call it major functionality.

    17. Re:bye by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      my 'fix' has been to stop upgrading, about 2 or even more years ago.

      yes, it has bugs and probably security issues, but I deal with that instead of dealing with more bullshit from moz.

      really - a web browser is a little bit like a flashlight; it has a job to do, its clearly defined and its not hard to solve the problem. I don't need a flashlight with 'accessories' on it or with 'helpful advertising'. I simply need it to work, stay stable and not change every damned time someone has an itch to change-just-for-changes-sake.

      I won't give up what I have, but I have stopped upgrading a long time ago.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    18. Re:bye by trabby · · Score: 2

      Go and get some Pale Moon.

      http://www.palemoon.org/

      Classic Firefox UI, developer ignores moronic Mozilla decisions, has 64-bit Windows version out of the box.

    19. Re:bye by JMJimmy · · Score: 2

      Tell that to Win8 when it starts complaining about low 32bit memory and minimizing/terminating your programs.

      Err, what?
      Win8 automatically terminates processes when low on memory?!
      So what's the point of paging in that case?!

      I'ev got Win8.1, seems to work fine, especially after Classic Shell and 7+ Taskbar Tweaker and MouseWiz.

      Yup. Easiest way to trigger the "feature" is to run a 32-bit browser + a 32-bit game that will fill the 2GB limit. At first it will warn you, taking your full screen game and minimizing it to tell you to close a specific program (oddly never the game itself). If you close that warning it'll repeat this process a few times and on the odd occasion, after a few warnings, it will simply say [We have terminated X program due to low memory]

    20. Re: bye by jez9999 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Every "ux expert" and "architect" seems to think they're god's own gift to mankind, and Mozilla is packed to the brim with those.

      The main problem is that Mozilla is filled with project managers and senior devs who LISTEN to the UX 'experts' and let them drive the agenda. Why they do is beyond me. Perhaps it is a plot by Google or perhaps they are just morons.

    21. Re:bye by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      The memory is there to be used - you're entirely correct. I cannot fault you for that. But, when the system has 4 gig of memory, and Firefox is using 60% of that memory - IT IS SIMPLY TO MUCH!

      I recently installed Pale Moon. I've not yet seen Pale Moon using 25% of system memory. I have a lot of tabs open right now, and Palemoon is using 17% of system memory. Enlightenment and Palemoon are constantly swapping places for top memory usage position in htop. The only other process that competes, is lightdm . This means that I can fire up a lot more applications, or I can actually do some compiling while the browser runs.

      Yeah, I have memory, but it's MINE to decide how to use, not Mozilla's.

      And, yes, this IS part of the reason I switched to Pale Moon. The subject of TFS and TFA are another reason. And - I'm also an adventurous type. I'll run any browser that comes along - if it behaves as I wish it to.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    22. Re:bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "But you can always change it back" came the official reply [twitter.com].

      More to the point, "but you can change it back" was the excuse for Tabs on Top. Then, the tickbox for tabs on bottom went away. Then, the about:config preference for it went away.

      "But you can change it back" was the excuse for when the status bar went away. Then, as of 4.0, you couldn't change it back at all. Someone had to write an extension to undo the UX team's fuckup.

      "But you can change it back" was the excuse for Javashit enabled by default. Then, the tickbox in the UI to enable/disable Javashit went away. How long until some UXtard decides Javashit should no longer be disablable even from within about:config?

      "But you don't have to install it" was the excuse for DRM/EME. Any takers on how long that remains true?

      "But you can change it back" is the thin edge of the wedge; it's how a UXtard tells the userbase that however much you loathe his "elegant" "innovation", someday you won't be able to change it back, because his UX vision is more important than your - the actual user's - experience.

      Fuck Asa Dotzler and fuck all his clones.

    23. Re:bye by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      I suspect that a lot of people THINK in pictorial form. When I want to go to slashdot.org, I type slashdot.org. Yeah, the browser autocompletes for me, but I continue typing the address in. I've been doing it that way since before there was a Firefox, it's a habit that I see no need, or even a desire to break.

      Wonder how many slashdotters couldn't find slashdot without a shortcut? The idea is hilarious, IMHO.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    24. Re:bye by mujadaddy · · Score: 2

      Major? Jesus Christ.

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    25. Re:bye by JMJimmy · · Score: 3

      I've been using Windows 8/8.1 since release and have never seen an error message like that. It's more likely a virus or hardware problem with your computer.

      Well, if YOU haven't seen it... [facepalm]

      https://answers.microsoft.com/...

    26. Re:bye by byuu · · Score: 2

      You and me both. I'm stuck on FF28, which is the last version with a sane UI.

      Due to security concerns, I'm probably going to have to start doing all my web browsing inside of a VM soon.

      Really wish Opera were open source. Vivaldi looks like even more of a trainwreck UI-wise.

    27. Re:bye by byuu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Which about:config value can I tweak to turn off Australis and have normal navigation+refresh+home buttons, and tabs under the URL bar? Which one will let me turn off download history (without killing my browser history as well)? Which one will let me show the compact one-line URL bar dropdown results? Which one will let me install unsigned extensions again? Which one will let me use HTTP/2 without TLS, as the RFC defines?

    28. Re:bye by byuu · · Score: 2

      Google just removed 200 extensions that turned out to be malicious and would steal login credentials, inject ads and other such fun things.

      I don't want to have to install a dozen third-party extensions from people I don't know or trust with handles like XxFoX69eRxX to get functionality back which I already had.

    29. Re: bye by CrashNBrn · · Score: 2
      Maybe, but in almost every single browser topic here on /. there will be at least one thread going off about shitty Australis --- Which really puts into question the rest of their complaints. The Firefox Australis UI may look different than the previous traditional FF UI... but so what?! If you don't like it, its little more than some standard CSS to adjust the UI however the hell you want.
      Almost every single FF bitch about changes is little more than bullshit --- I have yet to see a FF change that can't be reverted with either CSS or an extension.

      If there really was some agenda to "destroy" Firefox, they certainly wouldn't leave in the ability to undo/revert these so-called horrible changes.

      NOTE:
      I use FF primarily, and Opera Dev (Oink). Prior to 2012 (1999-2012) I used Opera (versions 5-12) 99%+ of the time.

      The FireFox "+ Customize" along with UserJS and UserCSS gives you most of the freedom that Opera users used to have with regards to control over the UI.

      I know I'm thankful Firefox is still around, and I wouldn't of been caught dead using it back in Opera's heyday.


      To me the biggest slap in the face in regards to "Chrome/Blink" --- you aren't even allowed to reorganize extension icons on the "address bar". You cannot/are not allowed to move extension icons to any other place in the interface. Chrome's UI is so locked down as to make a comparison between a blink-based browser and gecko-based browser almost impossible as far as the UI is concerned.

    30. Re:bye by CaTfiSh · · Score: 2

      Why not use Palemoon?

    31. Re:bye by Blue+Stone · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also on the top right of a new tab is a settings 'cog' where you can choose "Enhanced", "Classic" or "Blank" so you can easily turn this off.

      The details are fairly straightforward and are laid out on this page.

      Some choice exerpts to soothe the paniced minds:

      Easy to control

      Tiles are easily pinned, moved around or removed using simple drag-and-drop and close interfaces. If you do not want to see any Tiles, you can deactivate them completely in two clicks through the new tab gear control.
      Respects your privacy

      What data is being collected?

      Mozilla collects Tiles related data such as number of clicks, impressions and Tile specific data (e.g. position and size of grid) to help Mozilla determine how frequently the Tile has been seen or interacted with, as well as your IP address (collected by Firefox, quickly translated into a region code and then deleted).
      What data is collected when I opt out?

      No data is collected when a user deactivates the Enhanced Tiles experience.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    32. Re: bye by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think you have to come up with that many conspiracy theories, Mozilla's "problem" is that they won. They broke Microsoft's monopoly, made HTML/CSS properly standardized and together with KHTML/WebKit/Blink some 80% use an open source renderer though many use it in a closed source binary. Microsoft would be laughed at if they tried any new proprietary extensions and for the rest the implementation details are all in the open.

      I'm talking of the unwanted UI changes. Then there were the release frequency changes that broke extensions every release for a long time. Then there were more unwanted UI changes, cumulating in the despised Australis UI. Then there was the switch to Yahoo for searches. There were the grid advertisements. Then there was the mandatory HTTPS proposal. Now there's this nonsense. All of this is being done when there are still many bugs to fix, some of them existing for years.

      Their problem can be summed up in two words: "Now what?" and it turns out they didn't really have any other goal in common than slaying the dragon and now the dragon's dead. Some UX designers get to make an art project. Some cowboy coders thinks more releases is better. Some will do anything to get away from the reliance on their biggest competitor. Some security nuts get to go overboard. Some want to go after Android/Chrome OS with Firefox OS, but this time they're not competing against proprietary and neglected shovelware and barking up a tree Ubuntu has made essentially no progress on.

      Let's face it, Mozilla mainly won because Microsoft was trying to keep the web from competing with local applications so they could sell Windows licenses, they got to the head of the pack and grinded it to a halt. They didn't want to compete, they wanted to put a spanner in the works for as long as possible. It annoyed many and gave Firefox enormous amounts of goodwill even when it didn't work properly, out of spite for Microsoft people kept using it and pushing for sites to support it. They don't have a clue on how to compete with someone that puts up a fight, which is their second biggest problem.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    33. Re:bye by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      I'm not a real fan of Chrome especially in terms of the tracking crap, chromium on the other hand I do like but it's never out of a non-stable release state. But I guess I can live with that. So I guess it's good bye Firefox, and off to hunt more browsers maybe check out palemoons stability now, since I had some serious problems with it a few years ago, check out other browsers like Opera maybe even IE.

      Shit like the 'force ads' is the death knell for FF though. $20 says that there will be no ad checking, and it'll become a massive vector for malware to boot.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    34. Re:bye by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 2

      Or use the button to disable shaped like a "gear" to disable it...

      Which works right up to the point where Mozilla removes this feature, as they have removed so many other features.

      Look, I get that programmers are expensive and Mozilla needs to pay the bills somehow, but maybe if they just focused on security concerns instead of trying to re-invent the browser every other version they wouldn't need so many programmers?

      Sadly, there is still little alternative to Firefox. Palemoon has a host of compatibility issues with many add-ons, Chrome is Google spyware, and Opera and Chromium just don't have the range of add-ons that Firefox has.

  2. This is the last fucking straw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why? Why do you rape us with this kind of shit? Is fucking with the UI (making the goddamn options menu a ugly mess of a webpage) and adding DRM codecs not enough?

    Jesus christ on a stick. You can't find a way to suicide your market share faster.

    1. Re:This is the last fucking straw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's not an answer. Why the fuck would anyone bend over backwards to make Firefox usable when they can just download a different browser?

      I'm with OP. Mozilla apparently has a death wish and doesn't give a shit about how they treat their users, so fuck 'em.

    2. Re:This is the last fucking straw by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      DRM codecs are a feature, it allows you to access more sites. Some people are out to make software and not always a political statement.
      However adding custom adds doesn't seem to help the end user out in any way.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:This is the last fucking straw by jez9999 · · Score: 4, Informative

      This stuff applies to the Firefox GUI rather than the underlying rendering engine. Use something that utilizes Gecko but without the crappy UI, like SeaMonkey or Pale Moon.

    4. Re:This is the last fucking straw by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      "Features" are in the eye of the beholder. If I need DRM to access a site, I just move on to something more interesting and/or important. I simply do not play that game. If I wanted to be digitally restricted, I could always get caught robbing a bank, and spend several years in prison, right?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  3. How about ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "With Suggested Tiles, we want to show the world that it is possible to do relevant advertising and content recommendations while still respecting users' privacy and giving them control over their data."

    How about no? How about some of us don't want advertising? How about you better give a mechanism to disable this crap?

    What part of "not interested in your damned ads" is hard to understand?

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:How about ... by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Provide a method to turn this off and I'll keep using Firefox. If not, I may need to like Chrome more...

      --

      To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

    2. Re:How about ... by mrt_2394871 · · Score: 4, Informative

      How about you better give a mechanism to disable this crap?

      Click on the "gear" icon (top right of the new tab page)
      Clear the "Include suggested sites" box

    3. Re:How about ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      While I agree with the sentiment, what would be “a better mechanism” to disable this crap? The UI to disable this will be 2 clicks on the new tab page, or if you prefer, 1 pref to toggle.

      There are many reasons not to like this, but don't think they could have made it any easier to disable.

      IMO, the tie-up with Pocket is much more damning for Mozilla's reputation. They've just plain given up on trying to make the web open and fair. The Mozilla Manifesto means nothing now.

    4. Re:How about ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They made $380 million last year. How much is enough?

    5. Re:How about ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      ..because chrome doesn't collect browsing data for ad delivery? lol

      I guess the lesson we're leaning is: keeping quiet about behavior is indeed better than being open.

    6. Re:How about ... by dmgxmichael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Like it or not advertising shapes the world we are in. Where do you think the million dollar super-star athlete salaries come from? Advertising. Free programming? Advertising. I can go on. It's incredibly unlikely you don't own at least one thing you either got for free due to advertising or was subsidized by advertising.

      No one likes advertising, but everyone wants free stuff. Why do you think advertising is attached to free stuff? Who do you think is paying for the free stuff?

      Companies that pay advertisers want a return on their money spent. That's what all the tracking is about - to justify the money spent. I can understand them wanting to get that data, but I also understand not wanting to be tracked and targeted. Even if by an impersonal computer, it's creepy.

      Full disclosure here - I work for an advertiser. And here's hilarity for you - nearly every computer in this department runs ad-block to stop viruses or who knows what else from getting into the system. There's a lot of abuse out there by the unscrupulous to the downright criminal "one simple trick scam" idiots.

      There's a lot of problems with the current system. If you can devise a better system for all parties there's a lot of money in it for you, go for it.

      But it's two-year-old level childish thinking at it's finest to think you can get all the free and subsidized stuff out here in the world without the advertising that pays for it. Sure, you can block it - but if the blocking ever rises to statistically significant levels then the revenue model will be forced to change, and probably not for the better.

    7. Re:How about ... by ljw1004 · · Score: 2

      No one likes advertising, but everyone wants free stuff. Why do you think advertising is attached to free stuff? Who do you think is paying for the free stuff?

      WE are paying for the advertising and the free stuff. I only saw figures from early 2000s, when the total amount spent on advertising in the US averaged out at about $20k per citizen.

      That's a HUGE advertising tax that we're all paying. And what do we get from this tax? Better healthcare? Job security? Vacations and time off? No, what we get is to subsidize the parasites working in the advertising industry, and we enable them to force unwanted ads onto our eyeballs, and we get a few tiny geegaws thrown our way.

      I can't opt out of paying the advertising tax (through everyday higher prices of every single damn object I purchase). But I sure as heck will opt out of everything I possibly can.

      But it's two-year-old level childish thinking at it's finest to think you can get all the free and subsidized stuff out here in the world without the advertising that pays for it.

      I think you have a mental block on the question "who pays for the advertising that pays for the free stuff". Please hold off the accusations of childish thinking.

    8. Re:How about ... by Glarimore · · Score: 2

      But Google isn't keeping quiet about it, either. Everyone knows Google makes their money from sharing user's habits with 3rd parties and targeting advertising.

  4. Firefox becomes Netscape by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

    Remember when the Netscape web browser cost $40? Remember buying one? Me neither.

    Looks like it's time to start uninstalling Firefox across all computers...

    1. Re:Firefox becomes Netscape by Wycliffe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Remember when the Netscape web browser cost $40? Remember buying one? Me neither.

      Looks like it's time to start uninstalling Firefox across all computers...

      The world has changed a lot since then. I would gladly pay $40 for a good browser before I will put up with ads. I use
      my browser too much to put up with ads. Luckily, I don't have to as there are still several good free ones.

    2. Re:Firefox becomes Netscape by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Looks like it's time to start uninstalling Firefox across all computers...

      Yes, and install Chrome because that won't collect any of your data.

      Or, uncheck the option from the menu, which is admittedly much less fun than throwing a total shitfit.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:Firefox becomes Netscape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      False dichotomy.

      Why can't I throw a total shitfit AND uncheck the option from the menu?

    4. Re:Firefox becomes Netscape by sonamchauhan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > The world has changed a lot since then. I would gladly pay $40 for a good browser
      Not really - you've just become richer :-P

  5. IceCat by 0123456789 · · Score: 2

    And that might be the push needed for me to try out IceCat (formerly IceWeasel) https://www.gnu.org/software/g...

  6. Respecting Privacy??? by Luthair · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is taking our browser history to serve ads respecting our privacy?

    A search suggests they made $311 million in 2012, how much money is actually required to run Mozilla?

    1. Re:Respecting Privacy??? by Dagger2 · · Score: 2

      For what it's worth: they don't take it. Your browser tracks your history (as it has always done, unless you've turned that off), and makes the decisions of which adverts to display locally.

      Mozilla can attempt to infer your browsing history from which adverts you load (and I've seen discussions about trying to reduce the amount of information they receive, although I don't know how much of that actually made it to the implementation), but they don't get a copy of it. Only your local browser gets that.

  7. Re:Nope by Thiez · · Score: 4, Informative
    TFA actually mentions

    * Note: if you set DNT=1, it is possible that you may not be receiving Suggested Tiles. You can very simply enable them on the new tab page with the cogwheel. We made the decision to opt users out of all sponsored Tiles experiences if they have DNT=1 quite early on, as we believe that most DNT early adopters are seeking to opt out of all advertising experiences. However, it’s important to understand that no tracking is involved in delivering Tiles.

  8. Re:Roll your own... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Honestly, at that point I'd rather switch to Pale Moon.

  9. WTF by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How can they be respecting my privacy seeing that such a feature would require that they have access to my browsing history. Even if (in theory) they aren't downloading my browsing history and it is my browser making the requests they can deduce what sites I must be browsing to request such "suggestions."

    So if I mostly go to sites that involve sex with bowls of pasta and my browser were to request suggestions involving bowls of pasta porn it isn't much of stretch for them to guess what kind of sites I go to.

    This shit pisses me off. I already use a VPN to keep my ISP from this sort of interference. Now it is my damn browser ratting on me.

    How about a big fat no. Firefox already has a dropping market share and now it will drop by at least one more(me).

    Just to be clear as to how much I value my privacy and don't want tracking. I use a VM for all services that I log into that goes through a separate VPN. Thus my day to day surfing is 100% separate from anything that has any logins. So any cookies/IP address that facebook, google, etc might have handed to me aren't available during my general web surfing.

    I break zero laws yet I still want nobody tracking me as is my right.

    1. Re:WTF by Luthair · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why do you trust your VPN provider more than your ISP? Or your hosting provider if you're running your own VPN.

  10. Delete history and cookies by houghi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I delete all history and cookies and cache each time I log out. Although I like the technical aspect of tracing me and showing advertisement, as a consumer and user I detest it.

    I detest it more than I like it. Or like Banksy says:
    People are taking the piss out of you everyday. They butt into your life, take a cheap shot at you and then disappear. They leer at you from tall buildings and make you feel small. They make flippant comments from buses that imply youâ(TM)re not sexy enough and that all the fun is happening somewhere else. They are on TV making your girlfriend feel inadequate. They have access to the most sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it. They are The Advertisers and they are laughing at you.

    You, however, are forbidden to touch them. Trademarks, intellectual property rights and copyright law mean advertisers can say what they like wherever they like with total impunity.

    Fuck that. Any advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours. Itâ(TM)s yours to take, re-arrange and re-use. You can do whatever you like with it. Asking for permission is like asking to keep a rock someone just threw at your head.

    You owe the companies nothing. Less than nothing, you especially donâ(TM)t owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, donâ(TM)t even start asking for theirs.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  11. Re:Roll your own... by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 2

    https://developer.mozilla.org/... Build Instructions

    Dude... don't do that... some kids may try it and cause an explosion or something... you don't want that on your conscience!

    --
    Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
  12. how far weve come. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mozilla 1998: we want the internet to remain a free and open forum and in this spirit align our software to freedom and the user. the users choice and voice will be come top priority in our products, and we will write the mozilla 10 point manifesto to ensure we always take this into account.
    Mozilla 2015: We want the internet to make payments on our car loans and help achieve the goal of replacing all 4 tires on the bentley twice a year. We believe, legitimately believe, that users want tiles to show them advertisements. we think they like having a video chat app in their browser and we want to make sure corporations understand what is possible when targeted advertising and a morally bankrupt moneytrain brand come together to abuse their users trust and appreciation. We are completely deaf to the fact that adblock and noscript exist and are extremely popular plugins for our hobbled shitwreck advertising platform masquerading as a browser. Hail satan.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  13. Re:Easy to turn off by jbeaupre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok, I see some commentators in nerd rage already. Relax. If you don't want to see top sites when you make a new tab, Mozilla provides instructions to disable them. It's just a couple of mouse clicks

    If you don't like my foot up your ass, I can give you instructions to remove it.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  14. Re:Easily defeated.... by JMJimmy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I keep 0 history. Soon as my browser closes, history is wiped. So if this simply looks at my history and serves me adds based on it, then hypothetically this would not work on my system.

    Of course if they look at other things (or FF stores info in some hidden super cookie) then I will be subject to adverts like everybody else.

    Are you sure about that? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/s...

    It's been broken for some time. Install SQLite Manager addon to see what data is still lurking.

  15. Re:Ok, but the real question is... by Barny · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then you didn't read. These tiles show up when you click 'new tab'.

    You will get a set of tiles that include your most viewed porn, porn you might like and sponsored porn that they hope you will be into.

    You can stop these porn tiles from appearing by simply telling it you want classic new tab, not enhanced porn edition.

    Of course this doesn't stop Mozilla from compiling a detailed list of your porn.

    --
    ...
    /me sighs
  16. Re:Easy to turn off by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, if they choose to make it opt-in, then awesome, no harm no foul, and only people who turn it on will have it.

    But when it is made opt-out, it says "fuck you, we'll track you unless you know enough to stop us".

    And it's that kind of behavior which really pisses us off. It shouldn't be up to the average user to have to know where to disable this crap.

    Just like they backed down on 3rd party cookies to keep the ad companies happy -- it's a sign that increasingly they're driven by money, instead of writing a good browser which doesn't have all of this shit in it.

    If they make this crap opt in, nobody will bitch at them. But they haven't. And we're pissed off.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  17. Ads need to go the way of the Dodo by Panther+Silverelf · · Score: 2

    Banner Ads, Pop-up ads, Tile Ads, whatever you want to call them, all need to go away. Ads are where a majority of the code that inflict malware on unsuspecting users comes from. Web marketing firms receive thousands, if not millions of new ads all the time. Do you really think they have someone or even a group of people that sit and look thru the underlying code of every single ad they receive? From the day that ads started showing up on sites I have refused to click on them or found tools to block them: ADP, Ghostery, Blur, etc. I even refuse to click the text ads that show up in google searches. Advertising is not a beneficial method to gain my interest in a product. At least not on the internet.

  18. Switch to a Mozilla Branch by CimmerianX · · Score: 2

    Palemoon is branched off of Mozilla. I use it and it works well.

    There are lots of options out there... you don't really need to stick with the Firefox vs chrome vs opera arguements.

  19. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  20. Go SeaMonkey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.seamonkey-project.org/

    All the web-rendering goodness of FireFox. Stable user interface. No suggested tiles. Available for Windows/Mac/Linux.

  21. Non-profit revenue streams by Ken_g6 · · Score: 2

    Firefox gets its revenue from ads. Whether directly or indirectly, through first Google, then Yahoo, and now directly. They never seem to have enough revenue.

    Wikipedia gets its revenue from donations. They occasionally have a beg bar at the top. They refuse to accept advertising. They always seem to have too much revenue.

    I, for one, would much prefer to have an occasional beg bar in my Firefox and no ads, rather than ads and no beg bar.

    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
  22. You've missed the point, this is huge for privacy by guanxi · · Score: 3, Informative

    All the people complaining are missing the point: Adverstising is inevitable, and today advertising comes with massive privacy violations (especially tracking). Mozilla is developing a way to enable advertising without the privacy violations. If they succeed, imagine the dramatic increase in your privacy if vendors can deliver ads without tracking.

    From TFA:

    Mozilla is making a bold promise. âoeWith Suggested Tiles, we want to show the world that it is possible to do relevant advertising and content recommendations while still respecting usersâ(TM) privacy and giving them control over their data.â

    And this is not just superficial security; they have really thought it through. For one thing, your browser history and the analytics that determine what ads to display stay on your computer. For more examples:

    Because delivering such content to Firefox users can result in privacy issues, Mozilla has taken three steps to limit what information it collects:

    1. A system of rules in place to limit what Mozilla or its partners can infer about users based on Tiles data. Each interest category must have a minimum of 5 URLs. Interest categories are constructed such that no single URL is significantly more likely to appear in a userâ(TM)s browsing history than any other URL in the category. Suggested Tiles also cannot be triggered based on combinations of URLs in the interest category.

    2. While Tiles partners can suggest URLs to include, the companyâ(TM)s Content Services team actually defines the interest categories. A separate role on the team, which isnâ(TM)t involved in creating the interest categories, approves the final categories. Furthermore, interest categories are publicly available, stating the label of the bucket and the collection of URLs specified against it. The current interest categories are available in the source code here.

    3. IP addresses are discarded within 7 days of collection and no other unique IDs associated with Tiles are collected. Only one Suggested Tile is included per new tab page, which prevents impression data from providing a more complete portrait of the userâ(TM)s history. Reports containing aggregate impression and click data (number of impressions, clicks, and so on) are only shared with partners. No individual data is provided to advertising clients.

    For more, see these lnks:
    https://blog.mozilla.org/priva...
    https://blog.mozilla.org/advan...

  23. Re:giving them control over their data. by ravenlord_hun · · Score: 2

    You can disable it... until they disable those options in the name of "cleaning the UI". Then you're hosed.