Slashdot Mirror


A Beautiful Mind Mathematician John F. Nash Jr. Dies

Rick Zeman writes: John F. Nash Jr. revolutionized the mathematical field of game theory and was given a mind that was unique and deeply troubled. He became known to most people by the movie about his life, A Beautiful Mind. Dr. Nash died, along with his wife, May 24 in a two-car accident on the New Jersey Turnpike. The Washington Post reports: "In 1994, when Dr. Nash received the Nobel Prize in economics, the award marked not only an intellectual triumph but also a personal one. More than four decades earlier, as a Princeton University graduate student, he had produced a 27-page thesis on game theory — in essence, the applied mathematical study of decision-making in situations of conflict — that would become one of the most celebrated works in the field. Before the academic world could fully recognize his achievement, Dr. Nash descended into a condition eventually diagnosed as schizophrenia. For the better part of 20 years, his once supremely rational mind was beset by delusions and hallucinations. By the time Dr. Nash emerged from his disturbed state, his ideas had influenced economics, foreign affairs, politics, biology — virtually every sphere of life fueled by competition. But he been absent from professional life for so long that some scholars assumed he was dead."

26 of 176 comments (clear)

  1. I guess that if a Mathematician... by TWX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...wants a Nobel Prize, one's work must be in Economics, or Physics, or otherwise be recognizable in another discipline beyond one's actual field of study.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:I guess that if a Mathematician... by Xiaran · · Score: 2

      They can always get a Fields Medal. Also a Nobel prize in economics isn't really.

    2. Re:I guess that if a Mathematician... by Carewolf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, but the Fields medal is bit difficult because it has a low age limit. So you have write somthing great and get recognized for it before the age of 30

    3. Re:I guess that if a Mathematician... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 5, Informative

      There isn't a Nobel prize in Economics though, even if that is what the article says. It is the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences as Alfred Nobel did not set it up.

      Yes, it's technically correct, though I get tired of hearing this brought up all the time, as if it's some sort of weird conspiracy theory to make it sound like there's a "Nobel Prize" when there isn't one.

      Look -- the Nobel Prizes are awarded by the Nobel Foundation. They use the same administrative mechanisms and process for choosing the economics prize, the same academic body (the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences) makes the selections as most other prizes, they give the same award money, and they give the award at the same ceremony.

      The difference is that the other prizes were created by Nobel himself, while the economics prize was later endowed by contributions to the Nobel Foundation, who agreed to administer the prize under the same criteria.

      So yes, while Nobel himself didn't set it up, the fact is that the only body that matters NOW is who awards the prize, that that foundation (which actually OWNS and administers things called "Nobel Prizes") has decided to award a prize in economics too, which it basically treats in every way EXACTLY THE SAME as the other prizes.

      This strikes me like someone claiming that the Harvard Medical School or the Harvard Business School aren't REALLY "Harvard" schools, because John Harvard didn't explicitly will money to create schools of medicine or business or whatever back in the 1630s... he just wanted to create a college, and it was mostly a kind of seminary in the early days. So, you may think you are a Harvard Medical School grad -- but it's not REALLY "Harvard."

      There IS a bit of a difference here because the Nobel Foundation itself tries to keep a subtle distinction in the naming of the prizes, probably due to legal constraints about how the will was worded exactly. But acting like there's some big difference and it's not "really a Nobel Prize" is ridiculous -- it's just a historical and semantic distinction, not one that actually means anything in terms of how the prize is administered, selected, or awarded. And that's probably why the media usually makes little distinction, because in all ways that ACTUALLY MATTER, there isn't one.

      (And by the way, usually this argument tends to come up from people who want to claim economics isn't a "real science" or something. I won't get into that argument, but well, neither is "peace" or "literature.")

    4. Re:I guess that if a Mathematician... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When Barack Hussein Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for doing ... oh yeah, absolutely nothing, the entire credibility of all Nobel prizes took a swift kick in the gonads. Including those based on science and mathematics.

    5. Re:I guess that if a Mathematician... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I, for one, knew it was the prize award for "Not Being George W. Bush" and recognized the political meaning to the prize, a well-established practice that did nothing to the credibility of the awarding.

      Unless you don't like giving GWB the finger.

    6. Re:I guess that if a Mathematician... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was to make up for having awarded it to Henry Kissinger in 1973.

      To do that they would have had to award it to Starlight Glimmer.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:I guess that if a Mathematician... by BitterOak · · Score: 2

      So 36 is the least upper bound.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    8. Re:I guess that if a Mathematician... by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      funny, clinton seemed to do ok with a republican congress


      but besides all of that, your blame the republicans tactic has nothing at all to do with him winning the award. Plain and simple he got the award when he did absolutely NOTHING to deserve it

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  2. A true loss by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Truly a tragic loss, not just for science, but for all who were still learning from him. Both math, and that limitations are not what stops you.

  3. Thanks You Dr. Nash by cosm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Historical inaccuracies aside, the movie A Beautiful Mind inspired me to pursue and receive my B.S. in Mathematics which resulted in a very lucrative and satisfactory career. My thanks go out to Dr. Nash and my condolences go out to his family.

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:Thanks You Dr. Nash by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hey, he wasn't just a mathematician, he was also a computer geek. I used to see him back in the early 80's in the middle of the night in the Princeton computer center, wandering around with a deck of punch cards for the IBM mainframe.

      I was playing Frisbee in a field with some friends, and it started to drizzle. Professor Nash walked by, and laid down on a bench under a tree. He folded his hands together, closed his eyes, and looked really placid, but we could see that he was thinking about something.

      You know that saying, "A penny for your thoughts?" I would have paid a fortune to know what he was thinking about!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Thanks You Dr. Nash by cosm · · Score: 2

      Awesome to meet somebody else in the space, it is a fun place to be in. I'm mostly a DevOps guy now (I know --- buzzwords blah blah), but if a tough support call comes in, typically I spend my time in the run-time analysis side explaining "why is this packet being dropped from this queue" or "why did our convergence algorithm pick this path". Say a big data center customer calls and says "such and such is getting dropped on the 40G QSFP links during congestion, please explain your bug". Then that turns into a large discussion about how to configure COS queues properly and some education about xyz configuration spaces with the various protocols, followed by an update to our documentation if it's sparse in that particular implementation scenario or a white paper specific to their topology and common traffic profiles (tier 1 ISPs usually).

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
  4. Re:Please correct the headline... by AchilleTalon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He is known for his work in game theory, however he is not a game theory mathematician since before fading into his mental illness he was working on quantum theory. His paper on game theory is his Ph. D. thesis. Just the tip of the iceberg this mathematician was and could have been if the illness didn't stopped him. Anyhow, it is very sad he and his wife died in an automobile accident.

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
  5. And so preventable by justthinkit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A taxi that they were riding in was struck by another vehicle and the pair were ejected from the taxi.

    Why don't we wear seatbelts in taxi cabs? Is it even legal to not wear seat belts?

    --
    I come here for the love
  6. Re:Taxicab vs Uber by amiga3D · · Score: 2

    He and his wife were unfortunately not wearing seat belts. I really don't understand intelligent people not wearing a safety belt. Particularly in a cab.

  7. Re:Taxicab vs Uber by Whorhay · · Score: 2

    My younger brother used to never wear his seatbelt, arguing that he'd rather be thrown clear of an accident than be trapping in a rolling and or crushed vehicle. I had tried to tell him that the odds of that weren't good, even if he ended up out of the vehicle he'd likely get crushed. It all fell on deaf ears.

    Then one day a high school buddy of his was in an accident while not wearing his seatbelt. He was thrown halfway out of the pickup truck when the truck rolled over and cut him in half. His friend died almost immediately of course and my brother now religously wears his seatbelt.

  8. Nash just got the Abel price! by Terje+Mathisen · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just 5 days ago, John F. Nash and Louis Nirenberg got the Abel price in a ceremony in Oslo:

    http://www.abelprize.no/

    With a diploma handed over by the Norwegian King Harald and a NOK 6M prize this is the closest thing math has to a Nobel prize.

    Unlike the Fields Medal there is no age limit, so just like the Nobel prizes it tends to be given out at a later date, for work that has proven itself to be really outstanding.

    Terje

    --
    "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
    1. Re:Nash just got the Abel price! by HuguesT · · Score: 2

      This is a terrible irony. His death is most untimely indeed. Here is a high-level description of Nash's work on PDEs by C. Villani.

      I personally have extreme admiration for Nash’s work on partial differential equations. He wrote just one paper on the subject, in 1958 (Continuity of solutions of parabolic and elliptic equations), but this one of the most astonishing works in the history of partial differential equations. His proof has been often described as complicated, but I find it extremely attractive, and I also like a lot the way the paper is written: with a lot of explanations about his intuition and the way he arrived at the result. The genesis of the paper is fascinating, as discussed in Nasar’s book. By the way, one of the ingredients in the proof is Boltzmann’s entropy functional.

      Here is another description from the Abel Prize page.

      The paper is here.

  9. Fear of Driving by sonicmerlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It amazes me how nutty people get over "terrorists" when the roads are like a civilized version of Mad Max. People constantly die every day. Tens of thousands of lives unnecessarily lost every year just to automobile accidents. I feel like I'm the only rational person when I experience a certain apprehension every time I get behind a wheel, knowing that while racing through space in a multi ton coffin, even a small mistake could send me careening to my death.

    1. Re:Fear of Driving by HalfFlat · · Score: 2

      Consider if the media did do this — detail the (on average) 90 people killed in the US on the roads in one day. And then did it again the next day. And the next. And the next.

      Perhaps then the population would demand a proportionate response. Or at least would place the current risk from terrorism in context.

      Once that's done, we could move on to cancer.

    2. Re:Fear of Driving by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      It amazes me how nutty people get over "terrorists" when the roads are like a civilized version of Mad Max. People constantly die every day. Tens of thousands of lives unnecessarily lost every year just to automobile accidents. I feel like I'm the only rational person when I experience a certain apprehension every time I get behind a wheel, knowing that while racing through space in a multi ton coffin, even a small mistake could send me careening to my death.

      The difference is that while you are indeed taking a small risk every time you get on the road, you have the luke-warm comfort of knowing that just like, you the vast majority of other people on the road don't want to die themselves, or see you die. Doesn't mean they're all as careful as they should be, and some are indeed belligerent and dangerous on the road, though they are the minuscule exceptions. Most accidents are the result of inattentiveness in one form or another, or poor judgment.

      People, on the other hand, who do things like blow up train loads of passengers in London or Madrid, or who try to blow up an aircraft on final approach over Detroit, or who park a car bomb in Time Square ... they're trying to kill you. It feels different because it is different. We all internalize certain risks, but bristle - very reasonably - when we learn of someone who, out of malice, wants to kill you and everyone else nearby. A dead kid is awful. But there's something substantially different between a kid on a sidewalk getting killed by an out of control car, and a kid like the one in Boston, who had his guts blown out by someone who stood there, looked right at him, and decided to set his IED down on the sidewalk right next to him.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  10. Re:Please correct the headline... by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 2

    Furthermore, I've read that the driver did use a seatbelt -- and survived.

    If that is true then the driver is better in physics than mister Nash was...

    --
    Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
  11. Re:Taxicab vs Uber by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In a high speed accident anything can happen of course. The real benefit is in lower speed accidents. In the past at speeds under 50mph many people were dying or being crippled for life without the use of seat belts. Properly belted in those are almost entirely walk away accidents. At really high speeds I'm not sure it makes that much difference. I remember back in the early sixties I was 5 years old and my Dad was driving his 59 Ford (on skinny bias-ply tires) with the needle on the speedometer right between the 00 on the 100MPH mark. The car had no belts at all and I was standing on the front seat gleefully yelling "pass another one daddy" as my father sipped on a jug of moonshine he had sitting on the floorboards between his legs. He's 90 now and when I remind him of it (he loves to criticize MY driving) he almost cries. It's amazing any of us survived. But hell it was fun.

  12. Re:Please correct the headline... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    What you're saying is that if you die, you want to take the person in the front seat down with you.

    http://thecarseatlady.com/back...

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  13. Re:Alicia by HuguesT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A pretty remarkable woman by all accounts. She stood by him (even though they divorced) through the dark decades of his illness and remarried after.