Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Switching Careers From Software Engineering To Networking?

An anonymous reader writes: I am a software engineer with over 10 years of experience making approx 210k a year after bonus. I've seen countless of software engineering jobs off-shored or taken by H1Bs over the past 5 years. While I am pretty safe at my current job, software engineering as a profession is beginning to look bleak, and i am not even sure if I can ask for the same money if I decide to jump ship to another company (I live in an expensive area).

A friend of mine who works as a network architect with dual CCIEs have no problem finding/landing jobs with high salary. His profession doesn't seem to be affected by outsourcing or H1bs, so I am tempted to switch from my field to networking for better stability and greener pastures.

So the question is, should I do it? The reason why I am looking for the long-term stability is because I've a family of 3 to feed. I cannot afford to be jobless for more than 3 months if I do get laid-off, and software engineering doesn't seem to be the profession after years of observation to provide long-term stability.
Have a question for Slashdot's readers? Take a look at other recent questions first to see if someone else has had a similar question. And if not, ask away! The more details and context you include, the more likely your question will be selected.

227 comments

  1. Betteridge Says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No!

    1. Re: Betteridge Says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't do it! The real answer to the realization that you probably won't be able to earn $210k/yr forever is to save, invest, and lower expenses. You should also know that achieving a CCIE would be an unprecedented disruption in your personal and professional life and that of your family. I started on the path to CCIE but my wife asked me to quit when she contracted a major illness. I'm glad I did. But I saw how the CCIE track impacted friends of mine. Also, in my opinion, if you go into networking you will probably be working harder in general than you do today. It of course depends on your personality, software engineering sounds much more methodical and solitary than the often chaotic and stressful realm of advanced infrastructure internetworking. But if you're ready for a huge new learning curve and and the disruption that comes with it, if you think you'll enjoy figuring out what the heck is going on with some unstable and neglected tangle of OSPF routes and MPLS tunnels, then maybe it will be a breath of fresh air for you. Of course management within software engineering is your other option for maintaining the high salary. You could perhaps be the guy hiring and supervising the H1B visa workers. Again, it depends on your personality. I was in management for 4 or 5 years and I'd rather chew off my own foot than spend another minute dealing with the kind of people who populate the upper executive ranks. But again, it depends on what you are comfortable with and willing to put up with. I guess my only other comment is that despite decades of disruptive turmoil from things like offshoring, H1B, and downsizing, there still seem to be loads of software engineering and development jobs in the Western world. But I can't imagine that the salaries won't eventually be driven downward by foreign competition. There is, however, at least one guy still pulling down $210k/yr. So enjoy it while you can, but definitely save your f**k-you-money!

    2. Re: Betteridge Says by monkeyzoo · · Score: 1

      Seriously... dude, you are doing something very wrong if you make $210K/yr and can't live more than 3 months without that salary.
      And 3 kids and high cost-of-living area are no justifications. You need to learn personal financial skills before anything else!

  2. Where did all the money go by jandjmh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You need investing advice more than career advice. After 10 years of work you should have much more than a three month cushion -
    It sound like you have fallen into the trap of allowing your expenses to grow to consume all current income. That is going to be hard to reverse, and THAT is what you need some professional help with,

    1. Re: Where did all the money go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      maybe his wife is into shoes

    2. Re:Where did all the money go by ip_freely_2000 · · Score: 2

      You beat me to it, parent. I don't know how anyone only has three months of savings after a run like that.

    3. Re:Where did all the money go by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I'm sorry, no pity here - you're making over 210K / year, and you don't have at least 2 years run rate and a hefty retirement savings account you can fall back on? Sounds like you majorly failed at money management 101 - spend less than you earn and put at least 20% away in savings. BTW, that 20% is for people at an average salary, in your case, no matter where you live, you should be dropping at least 40% into savings, and likely more.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    4. Re:Where did all the money go by Ihlosi · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You need investing advice more than career advice.

      After making 210k/yr and living expenses, OP does not seem to have anything left to invest. Budgeting advice should be a priority.

    5. Re:Where did all the money go by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he lives in somewhere like Vancouver and bought a house. $200,000 a year is hardly enough to live on, little well save money.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    6. Re: Where did all the money go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd mod this +1 funny if I had mod points.

    7. Re:Where did all the money go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.daveramsey.com/new/baby-steps/

    8. Re:Where did all the money go by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 0

      +1

      If you're making $210k now, downsize some of your frivolous expenses (yes, you have frivolous expenses) and put 6 months or more of cash in the bank now. Go find a copy of Smart People Finish Rich by David Bach, and follow the advice. Getting a financial advisor/coach would be even better.

      You do not want to be pressed to take any old job because you need to feed the kids. Take control of the situation, get your finances bulletproof, and *then* look for your next move.

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    9. Re:Where did all the money go by tlambert · · Score: 2

      You need investing advice more than career advice. After 10 years of work you should have much more than a three month cushion -
      It sound like you have fallen into the trap of allowing your expenses to grow to consume all current income. That is going to be hard to reverse, and THAT is what you need some professional help with,

      I totally agree.

      I am more or less "retired", unless someone comes to me with exceedingly interesting work to do, I read, I paint, I draw, I write, I tinker, I vacation, I angel invest, I patent even more stuff, I spend time with smart people, I participate in interesting forums, and I learn more stuff, taking college courses if I have to, etc..

      $4M in savings is more than enough to throw off the $200K+ a year (that's at only 5%) you are currently earning, and as long as you are conscious of cash flow, this just grows over time.

      People who spend all they make are people who never had to eat Cream-O-Wheat with weevils in it, and live on Top Ramen, and Mac and Cheese, and Little Caesar's Pizza, when they were younger. Learn some freaking financial discipline. Come back and "Ask Slashdot" in another 10 years.

    10. Re:Where did all the money go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had NO IDEA everyone in Vancouver made over 200k a year.

      Software Engineers sure have it rough where you guys live.

      PS I wish I made more than 10% that much.

    11. Re: Where did all the money go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe his wife is into shoes

      The cure for this is to buy many more expensive shoes for himself.

      Then when they're broke, eat the shoes.

      Wife won't be into shoes anymore.

    12. Re:Where did all the money go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, its weird to make that kind of money and to have accumulated so little wealth. Here is my basic advice, don't be an employee, be an owner. If you are content to be an employee do not be surprised that you end up with nothing. Skill without vision means that your skill will be put to work in service to someone else's vision. The vision is more valuable than the skill.

    13. Re: Where did all the money go by Buck+Feta · · Score: 1

      He said 210k per year, but he didn't say dollars... perhaps he makes 210,000 pesos, yen, or roubles per year?

      --
      I am Audience.
    14. Re: Where did all the money go by Ulric · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you -1 redundant if I had mod points.

    15. Re:Where did all the money go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he lives in Vancouver, he isn't making $200k/ year in IT.

    16. Re:Where did all the money go by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's simple:
      He's married.

    17. Re: Where did all the money go by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Maybe his bat-shit crazy abusive ex bled him dry. Maybe one of his kids has special needs. Plus he obviously lives in NYC or the Silly Valley where housing leeches $5k/mo or more. You don't don't his situation, you don't know that he doesn't have half a million in a 401k that he can't touch in any viable way until retirement. Think before you judge.

    18. Re:Where did all the money go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of these folks are being real dicks about budget. They can't possibly know what the OP's living conditions are and seemt to equivolate 210K with living high on the hog. Some areas in California that's just scraping by.
      Now on topic - I would say that networking is in fact a much more stable base than software right now, but no guarantees. With assholes like Disney laying off their entire IT staff and replacing by H1b's to Zuckerbaby and Billy Bob clamoring for even more H1b's our job landscape is looking apocalyptic. The latest BS from these bozos being that more H1b's mean MORE jobs for Americans. Really? What an insult to intelligence.

    19. Re: Where did all the money go by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      You should never short-change your emergency fund, and at 200K+ a year, sorry, I don't care where you live. I and my friends have lived on a lot less in various portions of the country that you're naming. Granted, it's not always where you *want* to live, but it is way way way beneath the means of someone earning 6 figures. Otherwise waitresses, busboys, doormen and fast food workers would all be earning well into 6 figures. He's living far beyond his means if his stated circumstances are true. And the old quote "just because you can, doesn't mean you should" holds here too. Live like you earn 100K in his case, and his finances will be fine in short order.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    20. Re:Where did all the money go by gunner_von_diamond · · Score: 1

      People who spend all they make are people who never had to eat Cream-O-Wheat with weevils in it, and live on Top Ramen, and Mac and Cheese, and Little Caesar's Pizza, when they were younger.

      I still eat Little Caesar's Pizza and Mac and Cheese because it's awesome. It's nice to be able to do that because I want to, not because I have to like back in college! I do agree, his issue is clearly one of financial discipline, not a "career choice".

    21. Re:Where did all the money go by gunner_von_diamond · · Score: 2

      I was always taught that any type of bonus should be treated like "free money" and saved immediately, not spent or counted towards your yearly income. I bet if OP would just save his bonuses and not use those as a basis for his "normal" income, he could easily achieve much more than a 3 month cushion.

    22. Re:Where did all the money go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said he lived in an expensive area. Maybe he works in Silicosis Valley or Redmond. Sure you can make 200k there but it will cost you 175k just to stay alive. Invest how can you have anything to invest when your pay check goes to just staying alive? "ve been asked but always turn down jobs in these high priced areas. You are better off working for a company in a area that costs less to live even when making less money.

  3. save? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    approx 210k a year after bonus.... I've a family of 3 to feed. I cannot afford to be jobless for more than 3 months if I do get laid-off

    On your salary, you should easily be able to save years of buffer, at the rate of at least a year per year even if you live in an expensive area.

    I have plenty of friends in an average priced area making around $40K/year and supporting families of 4 on that. It doesn't involve owning BMWs or big screen TVs or living in mansions and they penny pinch, but they get by okay on what they have. On over 5X that salary, even if your housing prices are several times higher, you should have no problem at all building a huge buffer for bad times if you need it - even with a more luxurious lifestyle than they are living. Years of buffer should not be a problem except when you are just starting out.

    Perhaps some of the problem is money management, rather than your choice of career?

    1. Re:save? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A big screen TV is no longer a rich man's luxury. The best displays are about $2,000. If you pay more, either you're paying for a brand, or you are buying a jumbo screen that's 65" or higher. Which even then, it isn't going to exceed $10,000 unless either you buy snake oil shit (think the 'monster cable' of TVs) or you buy something that's so big it can't even fit into the living room of a typical mansion.

      The rich man's luxury these days depends on the kind of rich man you are. Some like coke and sex parties, some like menageries, some like exotic car collections, some like Learjets, some like live-in sushi chefs, and some like to own one of every kind of weapon in existence.

      John Mcafee for example loves coke and sex parties.

    2. Re:save? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On your salary, you should easily be able to save years of buffer, at the rate of at least a year per year even if you live in an expensive area.

      While I agree on your basic premise, that's not really true of the bay area. That salary will end up at about 3700 every 2 weeks after tax. Given bay area rents of $3000 a month, typical child care costs of $2000 a month, and well... just eating, you're not going to be able to save even close to half of it if you have a kid. That said, you should be able to save significantly more than 3 months worth over 10 years.

    3. Re:save? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      John Mcafee for example loves coke and sex parties.

      Coke and sex parties are great.

    4. Re:save? by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      As always, it depends on the area. Plenty of the big name areas these days are nearly poverty levels, even making $100k. Houses could easily be $1 mil + for something meager, with rents running $2.5k - $3.0k + a month. I know for absolutely certain that even the suburbs of the SF Bay and NYC would put a family of 3 in the ghetto at $40k. However, at $210k and "barely making it", you're looking at a much smaller area ... pretty close to downtown SF, NYC, LA, etc. Still, at $210k, buying a meager 3/2 1500 sq ft house in the burbs for $1 mil puts you at a loan equal to 5x income. And that is cutting it tight.

    5. Re:save? by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 1

      Nobody making $210k lives in downtown LA. :-) Just sayin'. :-D

    6. Re: save? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer mt. dew or redbull with my sex parties

    7. Re:save? by sound+vision · · Score: 2

      Is there another kind of party?

    8. Re:save? by dj245 · · Score: 1

      A big screen TV is no longer a rich man's luxury. The best displays are about $2,000. If you pay more, either you're paying for a brand, or you are buying a jumbo screen that's 65" or higher. Which even then, it isn't going to exceed $10,000 unless either you buy snake oil shit (think the 'monster cable' of TVs) or you buy something that's so big it can't even fit into the living room of a typical mansion.

      The rich man's luxury these days depends on the kind of rich man you are. Some like coke and sex parties, some like menageries, some like exotic car collections, some like Learjets, some like live-in sushi chefs, and some like to own one of every kind of weapon in existence.

      John Mcafee for example loves coke and sex parties.

      That's the way it always has been. The rich aren't satisfied with consumer goods and never have been. Here's just a couple examples from the 1920s. Drugs and underaged girls aren't a recent invention.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    9. Re: save? by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Have you been to downtown LA recently with the multi-million dollar condos and lifts?

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    10. Re: save? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lemon parties are my favourite

    11. Re:save? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I earn about a 1/3rd of this person, live in a country more expensive to live in than the United States, and I own a light aircraft, yet I have enough money saved that I could live over a year at my current spending rate. OK, so I don't have children, but believe me an aircraft is as expensive to own as children.

    12. Re:save? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more expensive than every city in the USA huh. where is this?

    13. Re: save? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      A Sharp 60" is less than a grand. Forget the 3D bullshit, yellow pixels, and 240hz refresh bullshit that serves only to sell into a saturated market. For real pissing away of $, skip the meat, tobacco, booze, weed, and other drugs.

    14. Re:save? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bypassing the big-screen TV, and investing that money thoughtfully instead, is how to become rich. Even the lowest-end display covers weeks of utter survival.

    15. Re:save? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You clearly haven't been anywhere near downtown LA in the last few years. Just sayin'...

  4. It can be done... but what are you ready after?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doing a job for money, does not for-fill me. I have 5 to feed, so I understand the money side.

    I have seen many in the IT world to be there only for money and NOT skill / passion for job. I work today with a group that mainly in it for money. No future planning on direction of the NETWORK or SOFTWARE. PS: I sit in both worlds.

    If you love networking and think with single point failure issues, go for it.
    If you are just doing it for money, find something else you enjoy. The money will come.

    Been in computers now for 42years, not planning to give that world up any time soon.

  5. Networking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Networking is changing rapidly at the moment. Large numbers of companies outsource their WAN networks to telcos eliminating the need for people who understand routing in enterprises. A lot of the the internal networking of companies is moving to software defined networking, eg Vmware NSX, virtual load balancers, virtual firewalls etc. You still need people to manage this, but in theory it should be less people.

    Personally as someone in networking I'm not sure I'd recommended it unless you are very interested in the technologies. Those that love what they do will probably be able to find a niche and make it lucrative, but you constantly have to be learning new stuff, I'm finding it harder to find the interest as I get older (37 years old now).

    1. Re:Networking by ezdiy · · Score: 1

      > vswitch, ip balancer gear etc

      But this is just tiny fraction of stuff done, mainly low tier last mile or local company DC. NOCs of big internet companies and ISPs operate with far bigger assortment of gear and technology. HW/SW tasks tend to be more intertwined plus ton of stuff which can go wrong and speed of troubleshooting is important.

      Redundancy solves hardware problems, but unfortunately human errors tend to be more costly in networks - by their nature these are usually far less compartmentalized than "software" when looked at from bird's view. Put simply, incompetent operator can do far more damage.

      Finally, OP makes it sound like all it takes is just CCIE and not being an immigrant. But the cert is just an entry pass and netops job market is is several magnitudes smaller, so there are proportionally less H1B workers doing it.
      I'd not recommend to OP doing this, unless he can get through CCIE fairly effortlessly just by using years of experience. That being said, basic programming skills is a must for such a job to get familiar with internal tooling used at any given place (eg here he'd need ability to parse bash,php,python,ruby at minimum).

  6. You're spending too much money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you're making 210K/year but are unable to save more than 3 months of living expenses, then you are living way, way beyond your means.

    Yeah, I know that housing is expensive...so what, though -- everyone else in your area is also dealing with expensive housing, and probably most of them are making well under 210K. Given that service workers in your areas are raising a family on 50K-60K a year, you can surely afford to save far more than you currently are.

    1. Re:You're spending too much money by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 0

      He's one of those people who doesn't know the value of $$$. "I can afford the payments" affects high-wage earners really bad when the music stops. Future bankruptcy is almost inevitable.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:You're spending too much money by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 2

      That's what I would say too. I make $42k/year right now (although I am single with no children), and after 1.5 years of that I have enough saved to be able to go without work for a year if it's necessary.

    3. Re:You're spending too much money by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      People create necessities from themselves. In my experience people in his pay bracket "must pay" for their kids to have private educations at 20-40k a pop per kid, must have luxury cars less than 3 years old etc. Money goes quick if you insist on creating expenses like that for yourself.

    4. Re:You're spending too much money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You start to exclude yourself from the group of high earners if you don't spend extra on those luxuries.

    5. Re:You're spending too much money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's one of those people who doesn't know the value of $$$. "I can afford the payments" affects high-wage earners really bad when the music stops. Future bankruptcy is almost inevitable.

      Yeah, I've always referred to it as the "minimum due lifestyle", buy an expensive house and never pay a dime extra on the mortgage, an expensive car on a 5yr loan that, again, you never pay any extra on, put everything else on your credit card and pay the minimum due... and run it all up to the point you can barely afford to make all those payments anyways. ... as opposed to what I (and many others) do... paid my 30yr mortgage in around 1/2 that paying extra almost every month (except once or twice when I got nailed with other unexpected costs) and dumping most of my tax return into the principal as well (rather than blowing it on toys or vacations), my car was paid off in 3yrs and I'm well over a decade without payments on it now (just gas & maintenance), I almost never carry a credit card balance - paid end of the month mostly (except, again, a couple rare times over the years for unexpected costs/repairs where I carried some to the next month). It's LBYM, living below your means... vs. what this guy seems to be doing which is living right a the limit, or above even, your means. Like when I bought my house I was "pre-approved" for a good $50K more than I spent on my home - I didn't *need* more (and TBH, if I'd bought that $50K more house I would have seriously struggled to make it and never would have paid it off early.

      Of course, then again, he said he's been there 10yrs so if he owns he would have bought in 2005-2007, big mistake if that's the case... I remember telling several people I knew in 2006 not to buy then, to hold off a couple years, it was a bubble and would "pop"... not one listened to me of course, and they're all 'under water' still I think - but they were also younger and probably wouldn't have remembered the late 80s boom, and maybe wouldn't have taken "(internet stocks/house prices) will only go up" as a warning sign. I always keep in mind that when the people who can least afford it are jumping on the "only go up" bandwagon, it's probably time to jump the other way.

  7. Multiple Problems Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First and foremost, how can you possibly have let yourself get into a situation where $210k/year has you three paychecks away from being out on the street? You need to make some adjustments to your living situation ASAP -- get your budget under control, eliminate outstanding debts, etc. You are near the very top of the industry for software engineering compensation -- it's not a matter of the market not being stable (there's very high demand), it's that you're quickly pricing yourself out of the market.

    Now onto the meat of your question -- you're not making a fair comparison. What would you think if your dual-CCIE friend saw your position and said they wanted to switch to software engineering because they have a friend with 10 years of experience in a high-level position who is making $210k/year?

    Yes, there are people that make as much as you doing network architecture. That is the absolute top-level cream-of-the-crop of the network engineering industry. It takes 10+ years of experience to get there. You will not be there on day one, and you probably wouldn't be there after 5-10 years of hard work, either, unless you get extraordinarily lucky. Your software engineering skills have nothing to do with network engineering at any level, let alone network architecture, so you will start out in entry-level roles making 50-70k/year while you gain experience. You may get to the point after 5-7 years where you're clearing 100k if you're positioned properly and very lucky with the experiences you've gained.

    Yes, network engineering is a great profession. No, you won't establish the same standard of living immediately, quickly, or even at all. Fix your personal problems and get your current life under control before you look at doing a major thing like shifting careers when you're currently at the height of your first career.

    1. Re:Multiple Problems Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now onto the meat of your question -- you're not making a fair comparison. What would you think if your dual-CCIE friend saw your position and said they wanted to switch to software engineering because they have a friend with 10 years of experience in a high-level position who is making $210k/year? Yes, there are people that make as much as you doing network architecture. That is the absolute top-level cream-of-the-crop of the network engineering industry. It takes 10+ years of experience to get there. You will not be there on day one, and you probably wouldn't be there after 5-10 years of hard work, either, unless you get extraordinarily lucky. Your software engineering skills have nothing to do with network engineering at any level, let alone network architecture, so you will start out in entry-level roles making 50-70k/year while you gain experience. You may get to the point after 5-7 years where you're clearing 100k if you're positioned properly and very lucky with the experiences you've gained.

      As a software developer, he knows everything there is to know about IT. q.e.d. This is why developers must always be given root privileges at all times.

    2. Re:Multiple Problems Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a software developer, he knows everything there is to know about IT. q.e.d. This is why developers must always be given root privileges at all times.

      I love this.. thanks for posting.

      The best are 'software engineers' (heh) that write in a language that does garbage collection who think they know something about operating systems.

    3. Re:Multiple Problems Here by tlambert · · Score: 3, Informative

      First and foremost, how can you possibly have let yourself get into a situation where $210k/year has you three paychecks away from being out on the street? You need to make some adjustments to your living situation ASAP -- get your budget under control, eliminate outstanding debts, etc. You are near the very top of the industry for software engineering compensation -- it's not a matter of the market not being stable (there's very high demand), it's that you're quickly pricing yourself out of the market.

      Actually, no. I routinely get 2X that offers.

      And yes, he freaking needs to budget.

      The problem is that "delayed gratification" is no longer a concept these days.

    4. Re:Multiple Problems Here by tlambert · · Score: 1

      The best are 'software engineers' (heh) that write in a language that does garbage collection who think they know something about operating systems.

      OMFG do NOT get me started on GC or this conversation will never end. Explicit memory management for people who know what the hell they are doing for $100, Alex!

    5. Re:Multiple Problems Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yep. Top of the industry is more like ~500-750k in pay/bonus and another 300-500k in options. I am in this range, but you have to work for a major company and live in very specific areas.

    6. Re:Multiple Problems Here by ctronsys · · Score: 1

      C++? What do I look like, a garbage collector? =]

  8. First world problems... by sydneyfong · · Score: 5, Insightful

    210k salary and you can't feed a family of 3.

    Software engineering jobs are in ever more demand today, and you're talking about bleak prospects in a job which you say isn't going to fire you any time soon.

    You talk about stability and jumping ship from a safe job in the same sentence.

    Hmm.

    Actually, what do you want? Or maybe you just hate software engineering as a job or career?

    --
    Don't quote me on this.
    1. Re:First world problems... by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      When you put it like that, it sounds like the person might have outside pressures impacting his professional affairs.

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    2. Re:First world problems... by tlambert · · Score: 1

      When you put it like that, it sounds like the person might have outside pressures impacting his professional affairs.

      Hookers and DICE?

    3. Re:First world problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he has prostitutes preserved by dry ice, I don't even wanna know . . .

  9. Move Somewhere Else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move somewhere else. If you can't save up a years worth of expensives just in case, then you're living outside your means. Only lasting 3 months is far outside your means. One accident, a broken bone, house fire, or etc... to anyone in your family and you're sunk. Get out of there while you still can. Getting a hire paying job will only make things worse because you'll fall faster and deeper when something happens. Living smarter is the way to go. And don't assume insurance will help you. They're in the business of not helping people.

  10. Um...210k? And 3 months? by bradley13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, I know this is going to sound "holier than thou", but it's still true: high cost area or not, if you can't live more than 3 months without a salary - and you're pulling down 210k (US$, right?) - then your first efforts need to go into a hard look at your financial priorities. With that salary, you ought to be able to put quite a bit aside - it certainly shouldn't be hand-to-mouth anymore. Even in a high-cost area, that's all true.

    Brief aside: I assume you are in the US, where there is a lot of peer pressure to buy some awful McMansion that stresses your salary. This is a societal problem and one worth resisting. Even with 3 kids, you do not need 5000 square feet of house. Get a smaller, comfortable place to live and put you money somewhere more useful. If you're married, obviously your spouse needs to agree with this...

    As for moving to networking, it all depends on how good you actually are. If you are worth 210k/year, then you are not easily replaceable. OTOH, if you have the feeling that you landed in the gravy by accident, because you aren't actually worth that kind of salary, then maybe you do want to change...

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. He should downsize his housing and buy a for rent apartment, to start a second income stream. Every 5 years, buy another apartment. By the 3rd one, consider incorporating. The key is to generate cash flow.

    2. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever consider that he may be renting a place in an expensive area? I don't know his circumstance, but he could be paying $5k to $10k per month in rent. And I bet buying a house would be expensive too since the market is probably overvalued.

      Assuming I'm correct, and maybe I'm not, then I'd suggest that he consider commuting to work from a cheaper place. Factor in the commute time and compare it against any saving received by living in a cheaper area.

    3. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are you spending 10k in rent and not living extravagently, Singapore? I live in the middle of Paris, and my rent is less than 1k.

    4. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Even with 3 kids, you do not need 5000 square feet of house.

      That actually depends a lot on the people involved. As a single person with no kids, I'm finding ~1,800 square feet to be woefully insufficient for my needs. When I do woodworking projects, I have to either lose my master bathroom or my kitchen, and sometimes both, because I don't have a proper wood shop. My drum kit, weight bench, and grand piano take up almost the entire living room, so I don't have a proper living room. My filing cabinet, sewing table, printer table (for a printer the size of an office refrigerator), and Christmas tree (too big for any of my closets) ensure that I don't have a proper dining room, either—just the breakfast nook in the kitchen. My bedroom has essentially no available floor space, between the bed, dresser, two bedside tables, and a treadmill, with the exception of the main walking path into the room. My guest bedroom is completely filled with the bed, one tall dresser, and a small bedside table. I'd like to add another bookcase, but there's no space left in my house unless I put it on the front porch.

      Basically, I've done the math, and to be comfortable, I need a minimum of 400 square feet for a wood shop, 200 square feet of closet space for the tree, at least 200 square feet of dedicated space for exercise equipment, and ideally a music room with another 400 square feet or so, for a total of 1,200 additional square feet, or 3,000 square feet total. If I got married, and if my wife had similarly space-demanding hobbies, and if we had three kids, even after you deduplicate the kitchen, bathrooms, and shared living space, we would still need well over 6,000 square feet. So 5,000 square feet for a family of 5 is not excessive. If anything, I'd find it kind of cramped.

      Get a smaller, comfortable place to live and put you money somewhere more useful. If you're married, obviously your spouse needs to agree with this...

      Or move to a location where you can afford a decent-sized house. Five thousand square feet is not a mansion. I believe that the current lower bound is 8,000 square feet.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse case scenario that would only leave him with 7.5k a month left over for everything else. I, and most everyone else not born into money, have lived on one fifth of that. I would love to have half of his income.

    6. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 1

      To be honest, he's probably either in New York or San Francisco, based on his salary as a developer. A 2 bedroom apartment in both places costs about $2,500/mo. $1,000/mo will get you a shabby one-room bachelor thing in SF and a below-ground parking spot in NYC.

      But, $3k/mo will get a decent 3br apartment just across the water, so I guess it is a matter of priorities.

    7. Re: Um...210k? And 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You use this word "need" I do not think it means what you think it means.

    8. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 1

      You have basically an entire music studio in your house (a drum kit, grand piano, etc), a workshop (sewing kit, wood shop, etc), an industrial printer (why?), a gym, as well as space for storage... And since your christmas tree doesn't fit (my family used to put a table in storage to make room for the tree), you are *UNCOMFORTABLE*?

      Your requirements for being comfortable are substantially different than 95% of the world.

    9. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That was supposed to be sarcastic, right?

    10. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you (want to) ramble around in a 5000+ sq-ft house by yourself? Sounds pathetically lonely. You're sitting in the living room reading a book or watching TV at night, and look around. You either see a whole bunch of dark hallways leading to dark, unoccupied rooms, or to brightly-lit unoccupied rooms, and you think how lonely it is. You wander from room to room that you rarely enter, and think how this space is such a waste. Much better to have a nicely decorated 1000- or 1200 sq-ft house, with your hobby areas in a basement or a garage. And in many parts of the world even this amount of space would be considered luxurious for a family of six or eight.

    11. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, 250k was considered a "millionaire". These were the Dr. Evil "One...million...dollars" / Six Million Dollar Man days.

      My how things have changed. I need to move to a place with rent control, apparently.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    12. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC here... 1k gets you a one-room thing in Paris, too, parking not included. But guess what? It's a city of people who also have one-room things, even rich people! Of course you'll go broke if you live like you are in Texas farm country when really you're in downtown Manhattan. You Americans gotta learn what is and is not worth spending money on.

    13. Re: Um...210k? And 3 months? by Malc · · Score: 1

      I felt lucky to be able to afford 670 sq. ft. Including a second bedroom for me and my wife, and only be 50 mins from the office. This is London. Your life sounds so bloody easy and spoilt. Sympathy for you = 0.

    14. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile in Hong Kong I live in a 300 ft apartment that costs about US$1,500 / month.
      I actually find it quite nice. My previous home was 130 ft and about $1,000 / month.

    15. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about getting rid of the fucking tree?

    16. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget taxes, such as FICA, federal income tax, probably California taxes, property tax, etc.

    17. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      This will sound holier-than-thou, but insufficient for your wants, not needs. I'm sure you can with a small amount of effort think of a way of not needing a full size grand piano (I have a fantastic stage piano that sounds awesome, which I can just about lift myself and take to gigs), or a personal gym. You're living better than a king, and you're complaining about it!

    18. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I'm not complaining. I'm simply saying that you shouldn't assume that everyone's space needs are the same. Could I survive without the drum kit? Sure. The piano? Probably not for very long. For me, music is a crucial emotional outlet that I do, in fact, very much need. I'd probably sell one of my legs before I'd sell my piano. I've owned it for two decades, and it is very much a part of me.

      But the more important question is whether that space could somehow be converted to another use that would fulfill one of my other desires. The answer, of course, is no. There's no practical way to turn my living room into a wood shop, because that pretty much requires a dust-proof floor, which carpeting is not. And it is highly incompatible with any other use of the room because of the dust involved.

      I try to do the dustiest work outside, but with me being at work all day, I have very limited daylight hours in which to do so. As a result, the lack of a dedicated wood shop triples or quadruples the number of days that any given project requires, because I basically get to a point where I can't go any further without making some major wood cut, and then I'm stuck waiting until the next day that I get home before dark, which may be two or three days away.

      What makes me uncomfortable is when those projects cause me to either lose the use of my main bathroom or kitchen for weeks at a time. Yes, it is, strictly speaking, a want, in that I want to be able to do woodworking projects, and that my survival is not dependent upon my ability to do them. However, because I am unable to do these things usably in the space available, I do need more space if I hope to do these things in any non-insane manner. And that was my point—that one should not assume that other people don't have valid reasons for wanting more space merely because you don't. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    19. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      This is California. All the garages in the region have long since been converted into bedrooms, and very few houses have basements. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    20. Re:Um...210k? And 3 months? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      The industrial printer because I have a side business doing book publishing. I've found no print shops in the area that can handle one-off large-format printing for doing proofs of hardcover dust jackets, hence the only way to usefully get books out the door was to buy a giant beast.

      As for the exercise equipment, most days of the week, I work until the early evening, then have musical rehearsals that keep me up for several more hours. Having that equipment in my house is the only way I have a prayer of getting any exercise at all.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    21. Re: Um...210k? And 3 months? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      See that's the thing, you chose to live in London. You could have taken a job somewhere with cheaper housing, but for you, being in London was more important than having more space. It's a tradeoff. For me, having more space is more important, because many of the things I do (both for fun and to make money) require a lot of space on an ongoing basis. This is why I don't live in a city that's so big that a postage-stamp-sized piece of land costs ten thousand bucks. :-)

      Either way, you kind of missed my point, which is that it isn't necessarily true that a family of 5 can't derive significant usability benefits from having 5,000 square feet. Whether the extra space is wasted or not depends highly on what sorts of activities the family wants to do when they aren't at work/school, and whether they can readily achieve those goals in less space.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  11. wow, no lie by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    You should be able to afford to raise a family on half of that, even in the Bay Area... unless you keep buying new cars, bought a house you couldn't afford... and generally just represent the kind of person who the people who grew up in the area you moved into despise.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:wow, no lie by bleckywelcky · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > You should be able to afford to raise a family on half of that, even in the Bay Area... unless you keep buying new cars, bought a house you couldn't afford... and generally just represent the kind of person who the people who grew up in the area you moved into despise.

      Actually, that's not true. Half that is $105k. Rent in the SF Bay for a 2 bed / 2 bath apartment within 30 minutes of that $105k job is going to costs you minimum $2.5k a month, more likely even $3k. So that's $36k a year, after tax. Your marginal rate at $105k is likely the 28% bracket. So $50k * 72% = $36k means it costs you $50k of your pre-tax income to pay for rent. Take the other $50k, chop off another 7.65% for OASDI / Med taxes = another $8k. State income tax will run another 5% ish, so another $5k. Suddenly your $105k has been dropped down to around $40k for the basic set of rent and taxes. And that's before you've even had a chance to pay for anything else - food, utilities, car, insurance, etc. And before you've put anything into savings.

      I remember thinking back in the early 2000s that the "6 figure income" was the pinnacle of climbing out of the middle class into the start of the upper class. But the sad reality today is that with monetary inflation, demand inflation for living expenses, globalization, etc ... $100k is barely middle class anymore across many of the major metro areas in the United States. In the minor metro areas across the country, where populations in a 20 mile radius are under say 50k, you can still survive quite nicely on an $80k-ish income. But in major metro areas, especially with a family, that is not true anymore.

    2. Re:wow, no lie by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting that you can live high on the hog. Although what I would suggest is not having three kids if you don't have some kind of financial security lined up. After just one unplanned child I'd be off to the snip snip.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:wow, no lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you use complex words such as "marginal rate" if you use this rate as if it was the effective rate ?

    4. Re:wow, no lie by davester666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1. Way to mix the numbers up. You managed to work the numbers both ways, multiplying up to make an expense include taxes, while also dividing salary down to remove taxes, making the numbers really confusing
      2. You cut his salary in half, then at the end claim there isn't much left to save. The half you cut is "savings".
      3. 40k a year for the rest [food, utilities, car, etc] isn't crazy cheap. You don't have to scrimp every penny just to get by. Sure, you don't get to fly to EuroDisney for 3 weeks each year, but you totally can get by with that. If you want to.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    5. Re: wow, no lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      With accounting skills like that, you should totally run for Congress.

    6. Re:wow, no lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did that, but lived in the crappy cheapest house I could find with four flatmates for a decade. Saved enough to buy a house in a less expensive area and basically retire at a modest, but well above local standards, level by the time I was 40.

    7. Re: wow, no lie by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      There's something to that. After my son's diagnosis I got snipped partly for this reason.

    8. Re:wow, no lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $2,500/m is only $30,000 a year, you nitwit. Way to lose $20,000 in support of your invalid argument.

  12. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have a nice salary. My guess is that you've had good raise for many years now, but reached "the plateau" that we all reach sometime regarding salary (regular pay). Your pay is actually pretty steep compared to most of us. Are you that much better than the average? Are you unlike most, and just keep on stacking the deck even after you've reached your maximum output?

    My guess is that, barring investing like Warren Buffet, you should be happy with what you get now. If you want the extra work and education involved, by all means jump ship and take on something even more extraordinary. If it's better pay, disregard why it might pay more, and just go for it! Just keep in mind if that's what you really really want.

    Is it worth your time and _your life_, compared to spending it with your family and loved ones, or even an interesting hobby or dream?

    The rest of your life will be your answer..

    Captcha: infuse

  13. I went the other way. by GrantRobertson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I got out of networking because it is too high stress. All you do is put out fires all day. None of the network equipment I ever used actually did everything the vendor said. All of the software you will have to support is crap, and you can't rewrite it.

    Networking is an entirely different skill set. Almost none of your current skills, other than management, will transfer. So that may be your best path. Go for a job as a CIO. You can manage big projects, help them avoid crappy software purchases, and not have to learn a thing about actual networking.

    1. Re:I went the other way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Struth: "None of the network equipment I ever used actually did everything the vendor said".

      Though I can add: "and all did some damned things the vendor didn't say."

    2. Re:I went the other way. by dancomfort · · Score: 2

      A very important point about the skill set. As a network support person, I considered my self the digital equipment of a plumber. No one noticed me if I did my job well, but all hell would break loose if I screwed up!

      They is also very little creativity. Most networks are already designed, so the job is basically maintenance, with none of they day by day rewards of finishing a piece of software.

    3. Re:I went the other way. by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 2

      I'd go further and say Networking is hardly immune to H1B's either... The networking departments at all the big companies (fortune 500) in my area are 90% H1B imports rather than 'native born' Americans. On applications for new networking jobs here the last 3 years have added a line asking if I would need sponsorship to stay in the US if I worked for them and it seems to coincide with the trend of the big companies not to hire Americans. I live between Buffalo, Cleveland, and Pittsburgh (those cities make a handy triangle where I've worked) and it's become chronic here.

      So yes, I'd suggest he goes for being the CIO. Companies tend to not outsource executives, so he's much safer there if he can successfully break into a market filled by business people.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    4. Re:I went the other way. by rthille · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that the software that the company I work for is writing (NFV stuff) will put networking professionals out of jobs before too long...

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    5. Re:I went the other way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been doing networking for 20yrs... and vendors have been singing the same song for all of that time. They never win, they just obfuscate problems with layers of protocols that I get to learn how to debug.

      Thank you for preserving my job.

  14. Pay not even close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be prepared to take a pay cut if you do this, unless you're aiming for some really focused networking jobs, like core routing, anti-ddos startup, or something equally limited in availability.

  15. Reality check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you make $210k a year, and cannot affort being jobless longer than 3 months...

    Than your first priority, before everything else, should be to get a grip on your budget and get some emegency funds. You have more than enough money to set a decent part aside.

  16. Wrong decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It wouldn't matter if you had all the ccie certs Cisco puts out. With no actual network work experience you'll be lucky to start around 40-50k probably because you have a degree already. Switching careers in IT these days means starting over. With your salary and comfortable job as others have said you should concentrate on saving as much of that salary as you can and ride out that cush job you have for when things turn south. A better option might be for you to look at a startup that could use your Dev skills and get some equity in the company vs all that salary.

  17. not to networking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello.
    It can take like 10+ years for a network professional to reach from 0 level to CCIE status. CCIEs get good money, their income is much more resilient to turbulence but the catch is it is a very long long and tough road to the top.If you start switching to networking, you will have to compete with younger professionals who are already CCNA/CCNP certified.
    I recommend to you the following career paths:
    1) Management- Move to business, people management, project management something management.
    2) Security. Very lucrative field. Somebody with 10+ years in software development can be trained as a security professional with focus on software security, and penetration testing. Who can understand better how to tackle buffer overflow attacks and sql injections than a software developer?
    3) Consultant? Architect? Start assessing, architecting and designing software rather than doing what you do now.

  18. Good Software... by Sam36 · · Score: 0

    Good Software cannot ever be off shored. There are still many out there that know this. You should probably leave the "enterprise" behind and branch out on your own.

  19. Don't go into networking by pikine · · Score: 1

    Don't go into networking unless you're the principal architect. I know a company that outsourced network engineering to the Philippines. They're willing to stay up late at night their time to accommodate for the normal business hour here. On the other hand, you do need some low level tech to do the manual labor of connecting cables and building racks of equipments, but they are not well paid. You need to be the brain that makes the master plan and ensures that outsourced network engineers work well with the local techs.

    Apparently this arrangement makes sense because Cisco IOS user interface is so poorly designed so that it requires a lot of training to use. I think the poor design actually inspired a whole job market, it's sad.

    --
    I once had a signature.
    1. Re:Don't go into networking by ruir · · Score: 1

      Networking goes far much more beyond dealing with cables and designing the data network. Far much more. Otherwise you are doing it wrong.

    2. Re:Don't go into networking by pikine · · Score: 1

      I think you're intentionally conflating networking with something else (which you failed to specify exactly what is "much more"), just to show the world what a smart alec you are. But we are talking about a very specific profession, so please kindly stay on topic. The fact the OP mentioned CCIE (Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert) should give you a clue. Get a clue, pal!

      --
      I once had a signature.
    3. Re:Don't go into networking by ruir · · Score: 1

      I am a network admin, but I should think if I should answer to an idiot. I am not wasting my time.

  20. Got a crystal ball? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > His profession doesn't seem to be affected by outsourcing or H1bs
     
    ... for now.

    Can you say for sure that this will still continue to be the case in five years?

  21. 50K a year will buy a lot of BEER!! by ChadSmith4920 · · Score: 1

    Where do you live? I live in WA State and can live very well with my family on 50K a year. Granted my car is 8 years old and I rent my home but it's all good.

  22. You are 20 years too late by wyattstorch516 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously, the late 90s was the time to hop on the CCIE gravy train. Back then it was practically a license to print money, today it will not guarantee you any job much less a high paying one. The networking field has reached a sort of rough equilibrium where the number of people working in it is nearly the same as the number of jobs. If you have many years of experience in complex networking environments then you can still command top pay. But if you do not have that then it is not worth pursuing. There are a ton of people out there trying to break into the networking industry and a limited number of entry level jobs.

    There are no full-time networking jobs out there in small and medium sized businesses. Large companies may hire a small handful of them but that is it. The jobs are primarily with vendors, ISPs, and consulting firms. You had better have verifiable high-end experience or close personal ties to get into one of those gigs. Otherwise it will be a relatively low-paying NOC job waiting for a higher position to open up and hope that somebody will give you a chance.

    I think your biggest problem is that you have the "grass is always greener' mindset right now. You are unhappy in your job so you are looking elsewhere. A better plan would be to look into other areas of software engineering where your past experience can be helpful.

    1. Re:You are 20 years too late by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      At my location, I think there are around maybe 8 people working as actual "network engineers" that are at our physical site. There's always someone there 24/7/365, sometimes 2-3. I work over nights, so I don't know how many people are there normally during the day now but I know the team size. I think though that we have far more than any other shop on average; we support thousands of servers, multiple networks, multiple data centers, and have the SABRE mainframes in our basement. There are also teams in other places that support other "legacy" networks, like airlines that my main client bought out. At the actual data centers (there's one right down the road) there might be one on-site tech, they usually rotate 8 hours and are "on call". The server admins are mostly overseas already.

  23. Maybe by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First, ignore the people who just want to shit all over you for making more money than them. They don't know anything about your situation and aren't qualified to comment. Savings and cash flow are two entirely different things, as I'm sure you know.

    I've been in networking for about 20 years. I don't have a CCIE, but I've passed the written three times and sat for the lab once (I took a sales path instead). I have intimate knowledge of CCIE compensation. Starting level for a CCIE is around $135K, depending on where you live and what exactly you're doing. I believe there are salary surveys published every few years on this topic.

    You will absolutely need extensive experience to become a network architect, though. The certifications would not be enough. Obtaining a CCIE is strenuous and would most likely require those years of experience anyway. You can do it, but it will take time and you will take a pay cut while you build your portfolio. Be aware, though, that networking is not immune to the outsourcing issues you're seeing in software.

    As career changes go, networking is not a bad choice, but it won't be an immediate lateral move in terms of comp.

    --

    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    1. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't shitting on him.
      If he can't manage his money at 200k, who's to say he'll be able to manage it at 300k or 400k?
      He'll just increase spending until he's living at 3 months again.

    2. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but I make the same amount as him in software engineering, live in THE most expensive metro in the country, and have huge financial commitments, and have a family of 3 to feed as well, and even I don't have the same dire situation as he does here. I have properly established nest eggs and cushion against economic downfall. Something doesn't add up. Are there huge medical expenses that you have to continually cover here? If it's about medical expenses, you probably need to see if you can apply for aid, although your income might actually interfere with that option. Otherwise, career switch isn't going to solve your problem, and actually, I don't see software engineering going away anytime soon in the US. You need to be able to convince the employers in the industries that are investing in software engineering that your services are worthwhile.
      And to the poster I'm responding to - savings is an outcome of cash flow, if you know anything about accounting :P Maybe you meant savings and income are two entirely different things.

    3. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have to agree with this assessment. Also, as someone who works for an infrastructure automation company, most of the major networking hardware vendors are now either embedding configuration management agents into their devices or at least exporting management APIs which the confguration management tooling is leveraging. The days of hand-configuring network kit appear to be going away just as they have for servers and, to some extent, storage devices.

      The good news is that should OP decide to learn about networking his previous software experience will mean picking up expertise with the various configuration management frameworks to blend Dev + NetOps skills. If OP is at all familar with testing and CI pipelines then the NetOps automation can be plugged into those tools and he might have some success as the NetOps specialist in some org doing DevOps. I suspect that won't pay 210k/yr even in the Bay Area/New York but its a niche to exploit.

    4. Re:Maybe by maestroX · · Score: 1

      First, ignore the people who just want to shit all over you for making more money than them. They don't know anything about your situation and aren't qualified to comment. Savings and cash flow are two entirely different things, as I'm sure you know.

      Switch wives, really.

    5. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adjusting for taxes, I would have about that same as he has. I also live in one of the top 10 expensive cities on the planet. Getting by with his budget and building reserves is not hard. All it takes is not viewing yourself as somebody that has "made it", but realizing that you are part of the working population and need to have savings in order to be prepared for a crisis that can come any time. If you have people dependent on your salary and you are not building reserves with such a salary then that is seriously reckless.

    6. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As somebody that works in security consulting, what I see (and regularly counsel against) is off-shoring of network management and even firewall management. With the quasi-mesh topologies used today on hardware layer, that means there is basically nothing left to do on-site except to place boxes and string cables.

    7. Re:Maybe by dlingman · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's the problem - that he HAS switched wives - a few times...

    8. Re:Maybe by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      They don't know anything about your situation and aren't qualified to comment.

      I thought the point of "Ask Slashdot" was to explain your situation and invite people to comment?

    9. Re:Maybe by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      It is. I don't see many comments addressing his question, just a bunch of posts about how he can't manage his finances without really having much context. There's even a comment about how he needs a new wife, for fuck's sake. We don't even know he's a he, right?

      Perhaps he has his savings tied up in a 401k, IRA, and college funds for his kids. Perhaps he's purchased investment properties. Perhaps he's trying to accelerate his retirement. There are a number of valid reasons why he could have three months cash flow. Could be he's bad with his money too, who knows.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    10. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have switched girlfriends... far less costly...Except the one I have a kid from. And I am 45 now.

    11. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that achieving that CCIE will probably take you at least 5 years (assuming you can only study part time). Thats about par for when people attempt them (and actually have a fighting chance of passing). And that's 5 years of real actual networking, not 4 years of sitting on a helldesk/NOC and then a year of junior engineering. Your current software engineering skillz mean slightly above zero (in that you will find the hex and binary easy but IRL you don't really deal in hex or binary much), though who knows with SDN - but it will be a few years before the majority of the typical networker's day will be SDN.

      The logic is just astoundingly backward to me - 'I have a friend at the top of their tree with 10 years XP and two of the most sought after certs in the industry that usually takes candidates of 5 years XP with a 30% pass rate - i'll just jump ship then as the grass definitely looks greener" LOLOLOL... not to mention, what exactly about networking do you think makes it immune from outsourcing? They're not outsourcing the 200k architects yet where you are? (newsflash: on the ground, architecture work is going to Bangalore same as everything else... network archs, SAP archs, security archs......)

    12. Re:Maybe by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the wife comment was made in jest. However, my wife - whom I love dearly and would not trade for anything - is not great at managing money, for a variety of reasons. She therefore manages to commit us to spending most of my paycheck, which, being in a very low-cost area, is probably comparable to the OP's. I have tried in vain to explain to her that a salary that's twice as much as most of our employed friends' (leaving aside the fact that many of them are unemployed) should go a lot further than it does, and would, if not for all the stupid iPad games and restaurant meals and expensive gifts and parties and the like. If it were up to me, I'd pay off our debts first, live frugally until then, save several YEARS' cushion, and *then* start being more willing to spend on things that are not true necessities. But, like me, not everyone is able to do that without causing serious difficulty in their marriages.

  24. Remember these words: by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Remember these words:
    "It looks okay on my end." *pause* "Try it again."
    When you have mastered this, you will be ready for network administration.

  25. What makes you think that? by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A couple of things come to mind beyond your current financial situation.

    1) Dual CCIE is the absolute pinnacle of the field. Out of 50 million people in the world who do IT work, the 600-ish people in the world who have this combination of certifications are the top of their field. It generally takes 8-10 years of experience and dedicated study to get to this level. Did you think you would just walk in and get a CCIE in 3 months? The lab itself costs several thousand $$ and requires you to fly to California, where you do an 8-hour long practical exam. It's the top cert among Cisco's 15-18 different certs. Most people get at least 4 others before a CCIE.

    2) A quick google on this topic turns up this quote, which is very apt: "Given equal intellectual capabilities and work ethic, 20 years of hands-on costs a lot more to an employer than 3 years of hands-on with 2 CCIEs, in most cases. Also, in most cases, a better investment." Ask your friend what his real world experience and the number of times he's deployed large scale complex WANs and various other technologies and remember that having that experience with dozens of networks is what makes him valuable. The cert is just the proof.

    3) If you switch fields, you will start at $50-60k. That's what they pay network engineers with no experience. After 10 years and 6 or 8 certifications leading up to a CCIE, the median salary is $165k. Making $210 is very lucrative. I would find ways to save money now, rather than try to switch careers.

    4) Your dream that somehow computer networking is immune to H1B is asinine. They will be outsourced and replaced at the same rate, with the same drivers and the same goals and outcomes.

    1. Re:What makes you think that? by wyattstorch516 · · Score: 2

      Your numbers on the multiple CCIE holders are off quite a bit.The count is over 3500 and growing. Not to take away from your other points but I think it shows that the field is much more heavily saturated then some people think.

      http://d2pvz33nyw2w7z.cloudfro...

    2. Re:What makes you think that? by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      THIS. Lots of THIS.

      Folks like to toss around the idea that Cisco Certifications are just dead simple and after reading a book or two, you can waltz in take the test and bazinga! Thou art certified.

      In their defense, once upon a time this was true. However, today's certifications are much tougher to obtain and you really need to know what you're doing before you attempt the test. ( Tests are about $300 a pop by the way )

      I'm currently working on CCNP R&S and there is a TON of information you have to be able to recall on demand. To top it off, Cisco updated the CCNP level certification in January of this year so it includes quite a few things that were previously reserved for the CCIE curriculum. ( You'll find much of what used to be on the CCNP certifications have bled down into the CCNA. )

      If memory serves me correctly, there are about ~2000 pages of material you need to know for the CCNA. Ditto for the CCNP and we're just talking the Core Routing and Switching Certs. Not the Voice, Security, Wireless, Data Center, etc. etc.

      The stuff you get to learn isn't common sense material either. There is so much information it can be overwhelming and it all tends to bleed together after a while.

      Cisco expects you to have detailed knowledge of the tech down to the point where you know the minute details as well as the ability to configure and troubleshoot them when things don't work as they should.

      Most Cisco certifications are good for three years. The exception being the CCIE which are good for two.

      It's unlikely you're going to find CCIE financial compensation to be anywhere near what you're currently making. I've certainly never met one making $200k+ There is a newer certification known as CCAR ( Cisco Certified Architect ) but I've yet to meet one. Pretty much going to be the God of Networking to reach this level.

      Don't get me wrong here. I'm not trying to be the rain cloud but rather pointing out some of the realities of what you're facing. I have to go with some of the other posters here in that while it's good you're trying to plan ahead, you really should be able to set aside massive amounts of cash at your current pay level. If you can't, you are spending far more than you should be.

      You really need to sit down, figure out where your money is going and get that squared away before you do anything else.

      Go ahead and start working on the certifications, but be prepared for the mountain of information you're about to face off against.

      If you can dedicate a lot of time to studying and lab practice ( yup, go buy some Cisco gear and build yourself a lab. . . you'll need it ) you might can pull a CCIE certification in 2-3 years unless you're some sort of Network Savant who dreams about routing protocols and Wan technologies. . . :D

    3. Re:What makes you think that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you might can pull a CCIE certification in 2-3 years

      From scratch? I wish. Oh and the current CCNA is 1600 pages, but it expects you to know a number of things before you start that could easily fill another 400 pages. It is mind-bogglingly harder than it was a decade ago.

  26. A great time to switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, you may want to read a few books on networking before you make a final decision. Just because you have friend that is a CCIE who earns good money - doesn't mean you will necessarily have the same aptitude/mentality for networking. However, because of IPV6 and especially network security issues there exist lots of opportunities for proficient network professionals. You have skills developed from programming that you can leverage as a network specialist, but you may also find that networking requires quite a bit of rote memorization that some engineers and programmers find tedious and boring. Problem solving will be more in the areas of troubleshooting and optimization, consider you may not find this a gratifying as crafting great code.

    Bottom Line: Do what you love or have a passion for doing .... the rest will take care of itself. I started building my own networks in the late eighties - just because I just had to know how they worked and enjoyed doing it (very much like others like model trains or cars).

  27. Woe is you by Cowclops · · Score: 0

    I'm gonna say what everybody else already said with the added bonus of a harsh reality check.

    Regardless of the expensive area you've chosen to live in, there is no excuse for you to not be able to survive 3 months without income. Love her or hate her, Suze Orman would be tearing you to shreds if you asked her this question, so i'm going to do so by proxy.

    There are people out there that have to feed a family of 3 on $25,000 a year. They have to spend every dime they make on a place to live and food - and for that reason its somewhat acceptable if they're having difficulty saving a cash cushion, they'd have to be REALLY thrifty and still not really make it.

    Meanwhile, a rough estimate of your income after taxes means you're probably taking $100-$125,000 a year home. With that level of cash in your pocket, you'd have to be snorting cocaine with $100 bills and then wiping your ass with it to not have more than a 3 month cushion after even just a couple years of employment.

    You should be glad that you're making enough that you don't ACTUALLY have to worry about food or shelter. Not making the mortgage payment on your $600k mcmansion does not classify as "worrying about shelter" because it was your choice to overdo it.

    Once you break through the median family income, your goal should be to save as much as possible, not to spend it all and have nothing to show for it.

    You need to, right now, go to a retirement investtent web site such as Vanguard.com, open an account, and start putting 25% paycheck in it until you have a years worth of income saved up, then you can drop that back to 10-15% or so. If you do this, you basically won't ever have to worry about money again.

    Yes, you won't be able to buy a new BMW 5 series every 2 years, no, you won't be able to move out of that $600,000 crapshack and into a million dollar crapshack in 5 years. But for the love of god, don't openly worry about your finances when you make over $200k a year! You have a spending problem, not an earning problem.

    1. Re:Woe is you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and then OP responds that he's paying his mother and fathers medical bills... womp womp :(

    2. Re:Woe is you by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, a rough estimate of your income after taxes means you're probably taking $100-$125,000 a year home.

      I'd guess 125k is absolute worst case tax situation, based on this.

      There are people out there that have to feed a family of 3 on $25,000 a year.

      Yeah, this. You're quoting an income that puts you in the top 8% of Americans. If you're finding it hard to get by, I'm curious to know what your imagination thinks average wage earners do to survive.

      --
      Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
    3. Re:Woe is you by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

      Oops, left out a link in above post. Re: tax costs: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ke...

      --
      Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
    4. Re:Woe is you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he/she didn't, as far as I can tell. And I suspect that it would have been mentioned in the 'article', since the responses so far are quite predictable to anyone with an ounce of awareness.

    5. Re:Woe is you by gweihir · · Score: 1

      If that where the case, then the only thing he could do is to hope to keep his current high salary as long as possible. A switch is not going to get him what he earns now for a long time, if ever.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    6. Re:Woe is you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1st world problems. :-P

      Seriously, I bought my house in 1991 for $172K (started working full time in 1985), I was making ~$42K/yr when I bought the house (up from about $35K in 1985), had been renting a 3BR house with 2 friends for $1050/mo before that ($350ea+bills), with 3 'fridges (2 for beer and one for food, LOL)... and I put 20% down after saving for those 6yrs. I left that job in 1999 at around $48K, and again after that, and by 2003 I was making $80K/yr and had my house paid off (after 12yrs).

      Of course I didn't have the 'costs' of a wife and kids, so not quite comparable, but I still have the 19"CRT analog TV I got in 1995 (which was only like $250 I think then) - and I got rid of cable so it hasn't even been on in 4yrs. My car is 20yrs old and rusting apart, but it still gets me from point A-to-B. What you "need" is relative... my roof was getting ugly, so I had that replaced 2 yrs ago (plywood and all), that was a "need" (new/safe roof). I'm thinking about a new car now (my 20yr old one is getting to that point), that's a "need" now (but a new car would have been a "want" 12yrs ago when it was only 8yrs old). I was laid off 2yrs ago from a job at $93K/yr, and had easily over $120K in savings (not counting $300K in 401k - rollover IRA now - which I wouldn't touch unless it was an absolute emergency), enough for several *years*. ... and I would *never* post a thread talking about how I was "struggling" on $210K/yr. I was "privileged" at $93K/yr.

      I had some (married then, now divorced) friends who were making about that $210K/yr between them, they were always "struggling" and asked me (because "you're good with money") to look at their "budget" she had made up... $900/mo between two car leases and insurance, a $2500 mortgage... ok, besides that he "had" to have a leased BMW 5-series to drive 30mins to the airport monday and back home friday night (they both were consultants and travelled 3weeks/mo typicially) "it's comfortable" - and she was paying $800/mo to her ex for child support (one son)... ok, that's 1/2 of it, where's the other 1/2 of their "$8800/mo take home" going? ... $20K on credit cards paying just over minimum due on things like a carpet for the dining room (sure, a nice $800 carpet that they'd probably paid $3000 for 5yrs later), bulk meat deliveries "because it's cheaper" (yup) - into a chest freezer in the basement they'd been paying $100/mo renting on (after 5yrs they could have bought 4 or 5 of them for what it had cost them), the $1200 set of golf clubs he was looking to sell after a year because he "had" to have the $2000 set.... yeah, they were "barely scraping by" on $200K+, but quite honestly it was their own piss-poor money management and spending on stuff they "had" to have (top of the line bicycles I never saw them ride, the guitar and amp I don't think he ever really learned to play, etc).

      Yeah, 1st world problems. Most people are happy to have roof over their heads and food on the table. If you "can't manage" with $200K+ in income, you need to seriously re-evaluate your "needs" (I'm betting most of them are "wants" not "needs").

    7. Re:Woe is you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:Woe is you by ruir · · Score: 1

      cocaine? spoken like a truly poor guy. I tell you, once you earn past a comfortable sum of money it is to blew it away when you do not stop a moment to think how much you are spending, and how much being left in the bank. More so when you have a partner in the same kind of mentality. Between two SINGLE persons, it is quite easy to blew 5k-10k at least without even a blink. I once got into that mentality into the honeymoon phase with an ex, but fortunately got into my senses a few months down the lane, and tried to reason with her - and guess what, she was not receptive. Guess what, it was maybe the main reason we called off the marriage. And once you put the kids also in the equation, I do not have even an ideia. And there are three of them. Given honestly the clueness of the guy, I would not be barely surprised if he is making 200k year and getting into debt.

  28. SDN and NFV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't the network is becoming software anyways

  29. You seem to be wasting money... by gweihir · · Score: 1

    If you earn 210K, but cannot afford to be unemployed for more then 3 months, than the problem is on your side because you are spending too much money. I would even say that it is unlikely that you will get this salary again if you switch jobs, as your current salary is way above even most high-qualification jobs.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  30. both? by mr.npp · · Score: 1

    why not do both and go into SDN. its probably where alot of stuff is going. i'm CCIE, but i'm now studying for the JNCIE-SP. as for SDN, it might be a good option as facebook, google, and even Juniper, and Cisco are doing it. depends what you like to do. i on the other hand prefer networking and systems with a side of programming.

    1. Re:both? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with SDN is there are so many implementations. You can learn the fundamentals and apply those to most implementations, but each has it's own quirks. I work on Openstack and each vendor seems to have their own notion of what a "port" consists of.

    2. Re:both? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Because SDN isn't real. Alcatel-Lucent is selling SDN that's a router with features. Turn on VPN and configure with a central server? That's SDN.

      But don't tell the advocates that's been around for 20+ years. They get angry. SDN is the future, despite being indistinguishable from the stacked switches I worked on 20+ years ago, or the provisioning server that remotely re-configured the entire network in a single keystroke, also 20+ years old.

      The "original" SDN was from the early VM days, where you needed a way to control communication between servers, and made a software switch, but that's a new term for an old idea, and so far, I haven't seen anything in SDN that's "new", other than some UI improvements on 20+ year old ideas.

    3. Re:both? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      That is risky. From a security POV, SDN is an absolute nightmare. And while that has been clear to actual security experts for a long time, it seems to get harder to ignore for management in the recent past. My point is that we could actually see a regression back to "one cable, one logical network link", because other things are unable to give you a perimeter or any kind of zone-separation.

      Of course, SDN could turn out to be secure and even NSA-proof, but who really believes that?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  31. From Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am a software guy who switched into networking 15 years ago and became one of the top-tier network architects. I changed back into software about 6 years ago because of where the industry is headed (and my skill set fit it perfectly). Being a network engineer (even CCIE) does not have a long future as a career (unless you just want to run cabling). Everything but running cables is being automated over the next decade. If your friend is not aware of this, there is a real awakening coming very soon for him.

    Sure, there will continue to be a handful of high end network architects, but most of what network engineers do will be replaced by software written by Software Engineers. If you want to break into networking, do it as a software expert (at your salary band, that sounds like what you are). Configuring networks is really not much different than writing very simple software -- just a bunch of objects (routers, switches) with attributes that define flow.

    Learn how networks function, and find a job writing software to replace the network people -- coming from someone doing this: your current salary band is easily achievable in networking if you are doing it as a software guy. As a pure network guy, you need to be at the very top to reach that level, and it isn't going to last long.

    1. Re:From Experience by jshazen · · Score: 1

      I want to echo this, as it's my situation, too. I was a software guy for 5 years, then went off to learn networking and security stuff, because I thought I'd be a better programmer. Got stuck in networking because it was easy, and my eye for detail made me valuable. But, networking, unless you're doing something really complex, gets boring. I'm now taking advantage of my networking/operations skills by automating operations tasks. It's a heck of a lot more fun than daily care-and-feeding of routers and switches (or even network design).

      People seem to like to call this "DevOps", but it's really operations automation engineering. If networking interests you, I'd find the networking guys at your company, and get to know where their process is painful, and help them figure out how to get rid of the pain. Working closely with another team should make you less likely to be outsourceable.

  32. Networking is like plumbing: mostly boring by mveloso · · Score: 2

    Just to warn you, networking is ultra-boring. Do you think software engineering is bad? Networking is worse. You don't really make everything - you spend most of your time trying to get configurations to work, working around bugs in firmware, or figuring out how some numbskull screwed up the various configs.

    It is, basically, plumbing.

    That's not to say it isn't important, but if you're actually good at software engineering you'll probably find networking ultra-tedious. Do you really want to learn the ins and outs of the OSI stack? All the weird things about hooking Cisco gear to other gear? Troubleshooting connectivity issues due to someone plugging a switch into itself?

    Just writing about it makes me want to lobotomize myself.

    1. Re:Networking is like plumbing: mostly boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I'd say the same thing about what passes for "software engineering" these days. It's basically framework cobbling. You're not allowed to improve anything the framework does and anything it doesn't you either do without or pile on another framework.

  33. start a side business by vinn · · Score: 2

    Want some insulation? Start a side business. A friend and I both started separate businesses about 18 months ago. Him, because he wanted to. Me, because I had to. His business, really a side business, is beekeeping. Mine is IT consulting, but I have a very specific focus based on a specific thing here. We're both doing really well and last weekend we compared notes. We've both kind of knew this, but this is the conclusion we came to: His day job isn't the most thrilling and has ups and downs through the year, but he loves his side business. Me, I have a stable new business, but I might consider getting full time employment somewhere just to make my commute easier, however I love the business so much I'd have to keep parts of the work as a side business. Most people in other parts of the world seem to work like this. End result - side business is f*cking awesome and most people just seem too lazy to do it.

    --
    ----- obSig
    1. Re:start a side business by cowdung · · Score: 1

      Side businesses are risky.. there are safer ways to invest that use up less of your precious time.

  34. A salary where investments can reach millions? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Brewster's Millions is not an instruction manual.

  35. Dodging bullets... by jtara · · Score: 1

    I think the only way you can make that kind of money is networking is dodging bullets - either literal or figurative.

    Either you are going to have a high-stress job where you will be on-call 24/7 and people will be yelling at you all day, or you need to go to Irag, Afghanistan, etc. etc. etc.

    Just find a job outside of the Bay Area. You will take a pay cut, but you will come out ahead.

    I hope you haven't been counting on those stock options that, in the vast majority of cases, will ultimately be worth --- nothing. (statistically, if you work for a venture-funded startup.)

  36. Bait and Switch! by bylund · · Score: 1

    Thought it was switching from software engineering to twerking. Sounded like a solid idea and all.

  37. Okay everyone, let's all post our salaries by Rinikusu · · Score: 2

    because we gotta show everyone how big our dicks are.

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:Okay everyone, let's all post our salaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $210k/year for a job title that shouldn't exist no less ... software *engineer* hahahahah

    2. Re:Okay everyone, let's all post our salaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My yearly salary is around 600-700k for software engineering, after tax. But it's not USD.

    3. Re:Okay everyone, let's all post our salaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you write crappy software, but some of us take it seriously.

    4. Re:Okay everyone, let's all post our salaries by Prune · · Score: 0

      Except, clearly, not seriously enough to have a proper and mandatory for employment certification as a Professional Engineer, the way the other, real engineering disciplines, do.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    5. Re:Okay everyone, let's all post our salaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck off. nobody should have that kind of authority.

  38. You should retire! by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

    "making approx 210k a year after bonus."

    For that kind of money you could work for a couple of years and comfortably retire in Atlantic Canada - and spend more quality time with your family. :)

    --
    Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
    1. Re:You should retire! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not likely.

      After taxes his income is probably just over $10 0,000 a year. If he is spending $36,000 a year on housing, that means that he is spending $64,000+ on other things. It's doubtful that his family is ever going to change their lifestyle enough to save money (especially if he has a non-working spouse used to spending that much money). Even if they could save enough money to retire, they would never fit in with people who have never been able to afford that lifestyle.

      They are stuck on the treadmill in Silicon Valley or whatever similar place they are living in.

    2. Re:You should retire! by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Sadly, it sounds like it. If so, then this person is screwed...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:You should retire! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

      I have a friend who bought a condo say 18yrs ago, "on track" to pay it off in August... no college degree, live in GF (currently unemployed, a few temp jobs for several months over the past few years) and he's probably never earned more than $40K/yr.... and even *he* has savings and some small investments. He bought the GF a 'new' (used, $3800) car a few months ago because hers was just falling apart. And this guy is moaning he can't save anything on $210K/yr.

      As you said, even with $36K/yr in housing they're spending $64K on other things, that's $5.3K/mo... where TF is $5.3K/mo going? I'd be living like a king on $5.3K/mo for food, bills, etc. I certainly wouldn't be thinking I "couldn't afford to save". You can't tell me there's not *something* you can give up out of that to save.

  39. Can't decide if this is a troll... by Drew617 · · Score: 1

    but I'll echo everyone else: I think you've got a lifestyle problem. I'm in Boston (not SF but not cheap by any means, either) and living on just over half that salary. In our industries, the days of punching a clock for 30 years then collecting a pension are largely over. If you can find that kind of security, good on you, but I'd never count on it, and certainly not from a lateral (at best) career move. Companies fold, funding dries up, and contracts expire. A cushion isn't just prudent, but absolutely necessary for most of us. If you're earning 50K+ and can't find it, IMO, you're not looking hard enough.

  40. You've got it backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Us software engineers are currently working on automating network engineers out of a job. Tools like Chef allow me to rack up an appliance, plug it in to the network, and it configures itself. The guys that maintain the IT infrastructure are literally being automated away.

    Stick with development, man. Software engineering isn't going anywhere.

  41. Change your name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to Anil Ivannovich Lee or something similar and you should have no problem obtaining that next programming job. And, yes, I know people who are doing this successfully. Hey; it is what it is.

  42. Fake Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly all the info in the post is fake. Maybe this is Cisco looking to see what others think of the certifications. Are the as watered down as the paper MCSE?

  43. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $210,000/year? That's how much money I made programming over the last four years. And you're living paycheck-to-paycheck?

    I have friends who make less, are single mothers, take care of children, and in some cases, are financing their education.

    Stop living in the equivalent costwise of midtown Manhattan. Move 25 miles further away from work. Learn how to save. Stop eating out so much. Try once a week. If your kids are in private school, pull them out. Get cheaper childcare. Trade in that BMW for a Honda.

    You're not being a good father. You're earning a massive amount of money by any stretch of the imagination, and you should have at least a year or two in reserve, if only for the sake of your children.

    Once you've sorted your life out, then consider changing careers.

    By comparison, the most I've ever made in one year including cash and compensation was about $110,000. I paid for a $35,000 car in cash that year, and still had a foretune left over.

  44. Wrong question by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    I'd rather know more about switching careers from software engineering to billionaire playboy super-spy. C'mon, think big!

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Wrong question by Megane · · Score: 1
      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Wrong question by gweihir · · Score: 1

      That is not nice. My guess is this guy is really good, got lucky job-wise and is working his ass off. The question is why is this amount of money not enough? That is what he needs to fix and he also needs to be prepared to have a 30-50% salary cut and be able to survive it.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Wrong question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  45. Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There are software engineering jobs all over the nation in areas with reasonable living costs and good salaries. Boise, ID and the metropolitan area surrounding it is one of them. There are 10+ large companies here that hire software engineers and the really good ones pay in the $120-$150k range (sometimes higher depending on the company). That's net ~6k a month after taxes where $900-$1200 gets you 4 bed/3 bath. 20% of your salary for housing is downright cheap. If you have 10 years experience and have senior developer (managing other developers) experience, you can easily ask for $120k and they won't bat an eye.

  46. $210K is an insane salary for a Software Engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    $210K is an insane salary for a Software Engineer even with Bonus. Most CEOs and many doctors don't earn as much. Check out http://www1.salary.com/Software-Engineer-I-salary.html or any similar site. Median pay for a Software Engineer is $62,670. Half earn less than that. Median salary for a Plant General Manager is $166K. You are in the top 0.001% of pay in your profession, and you want to leave it for "greener pastures". You could not be earning that salary if your job could really be headed to guest workers on H1B visas.

    You either have nothing to fear or your employer or your employer is an investment bank that is so terminally stupid it will go bankrupt soon.

  47. Danger Zone by koan · · Score: 1

    I cannot afford to be jobless for more than 3 months if I do get laid-off

    That's really all that caught my eye, and a host of questions pop up in my mind about this statement and what it really means.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  48. Oh, Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in a city of 1 million plus people and there is a 3M city 60 miles away. My combined household income is about $210K, and I live next door to a Neurosurgeon, a man who owns 7 Taco Bell restaurants, a few Dairy Queens, and a luxury spa, and a man who is president of a solid mid-cap corporation. Pull your head out of your ass. You can live in midtown manhattan on $210K. "Manhattan's median annual household income is $66,739, while Brooklyn's is a mere $44,850. Its less fashionable neighbor, Queens, outearns Brooklyn at $54,373 per year." Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2014/01/new_york_city_census_data_manhattan_and_brooklyn_are_much_poorer_than_you.html
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/20/realestate/what-is-middle-class-in-manhattan.html?_r=0 "A $70,000 annual income is middle class for a family of four, according to the median response in a recent Pew Research Center survey..."

  49. Cocaine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... It's a helluva drug. Perhaps start doing a cheaper one? Or give your nose a break? Also, banging sluts in hotel rooms on "business trips," isn't gonna be a money saver.

  50. 3 to feed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many. Consider getting rid of one, for starters. Ask yourself who is your least favorite offspring and how much you would miss it.

  51. bailing on development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting question. I myself am getting ready to make the move from programmer to DBA. H1Bs are a big part of it but the real issue is that I've had enough of being expected to do "teamwork" with petulant knuckleheads. If I already know the technology and can deliver a better solution in 3 weeks, why the hell should I be dragged along on their magical 3-year journey of discovery to the lost city of Mediocrity? Why was I asked so many fucking questions at interview time if what you really wanted was someone who'd check their brain at the door? There don't seem to be teams of DBAs nor do they have that idiotic fad framework religious zealotry that crushes my soul as a programmer. Besides, it's not like I can't scratch that programming itch at home...

  52. Planning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you are thinking of taking a much lower wage position? Step 1: reduce your monthly expenses to match what that new job would be. Step 2: Save the difference. Step 3: Realize if you do this for 10 years you could retire and live off the interest. If you do get canned that nest egg will easily support you while you change careers.

  53. Re:$210K is an insane salary for a Software Engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a starting salary for 'good' software engineers in nyc for some companies and it is about right for a mid level senior in sf. The problem is that between the insane real estate and taxing in those communist utopias, you are making less than any other major metro at half that.

  54. Rufkm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You make 210k a YEAR after bonus and threw the "I have three mouths to feed" card? I don't care where you live or what your circumstantial excuse is, that is a lot of money. I think you should get an accountant to manage your paychecks as-is.

    1. Re:Rufkm? by ruir · · Score: 1

      Better yet, get someone of trust from your family that helds your paycheck hostage and to which you will have to explain why you need money until you grow up and learn how to manage it.

    2. Re:Rufkm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make 210k a YEAR after bonus and threw the "I have three mouths to feed" card? I don't care where you live or what your circumstantial excuse is, that is a lot of money. I think you should get an accountant to manage your paychecks as-is.

      Is anybody here actually living in SF or NYC?...

      I live near NYC and have very similar situation - software developer with above 200K after bonus (but before medical) and 3 people to feed PLUS a little house (with high real estate taxes and 2 mortgages on it), 2 cars (very old one and brand new one) and we LITERALLY LIVING FROM PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK so I can't even support my family longer than couple of weeks if else...

      P.S. I have no idea how people with 40K salary can survive and even support their families - it looks like impossible here in NY - do they walk instead of drive, eat only rice and drink only tap water?...

  55. Re:$210K is an insane salary for a Software Engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with your sentiment about the $210k being an insane salary for software coder. Having said that, I witness first-hand how many months/years your average code-monkey takes to complete simple software projects. If you figure a project that should have been completed in 1 month and ends up taking more than a year to complete, getting one of those fancy $210k/year software "engineers" sounds like it might be a wise decision after all.

  56. OK... by tlambert · · Score: 2

    Just got asked about helping with the Fukushima cleanup. I'm in, in case anyone cares.

  57. I went the reverse direction... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: When the "going was good" over the timeframe 1994- LATE 2008 as a pro on both fronts, to do so (& since you seem "pretty well equipped" + experienced & I imagine you KNOW what I mean, per your narrative - before 'offshoring/outsourcing', it paid WELL to "make the move" from techie->network tech->network admin->programmer-analyst->software-engineer & your payrate even shows it).

    Nowadays? Yea, going the REVERSE is a better choice (even with SDN & remote access to servers) since you can't "offshore every server" & SOMEONE has to be there to physically reboot them or replace parts (extend that same idea to networking equipment like hubs/routers/switches etc. - et al).

    APK

    P.S.=> HOW to do it? Man, I haven't worked in the field since late 2008 iirc, & got out to start my OWN business (& I thank God I did, beating what's happening to you guys out there now - I got lucky, & so far since then, it's been successful thank God, again) - but, I'd say get the certs needed & go for it man: You'll do GREAT due to your understanding of "things software" & OS + networking (that comes with the territory of coding since you know & I KNOW you're often made a full-rights admin while say, setting up database engines + webservers & rights to end users via ACL & DB login lists etc. security-wise + more, so you're MORE than "3/4 of the way there" imo & experience 1994-2009 almost as a pro on BOTH fronts, but, "doing it in reverse" as opposed to what YOU'RE AFTER nowadays (my way? It was "the right way" BACK THEN/WHEN... now? It'd be yours for the reasons I noted above - good luck, hope what I said helps))... apk

  58. Wrong reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, I think you may be opting to switch careers for the wrong reasons. Instead of trying to pick / choose a career because of the amount of money you could potentially make, try choosing something you LOVE doing instead.
      1) You might find you absolutely hate being a Cisco network engineer. They are a different breed.
      2) While it's true that economically the core software development may be moving offshore (this is economics), someone still needs to manage these teams.
      3) There is tremendous growth now in Cloud / Dockers / DevOps / Mobile - the point being that you are always honing your skills, keep learning new things.

    As long as you stay current with the latest trends and offer value to today's employers, you will have a job.
    Ignore all those posts who berate you for potentially not keeping a large-enough nest egg. They are simply naive and don't realize in their narrow world that there are a BILLION BILLION more possible issues that people don't take into account. (I have a personal commitment to care for a terminally ill loved one).
    Lesson 1 here = please don't judge.
    Lesson 2 here = Choose a career doing something you love, it will never seem like work.
    Lesson 3 = Keep a sensible budget and try to live within your means when possible.
    Peace out.

  59. Troll article? by arobadog · · Score: 0

    What a frigging hilarious article! How many nerds can you make upset with one post?

    Finance nerds - "OMG! Can't you save?!?!"
    Underpaid nerds - "OMG! I make less than that and can feed a family of 10!"
    Network nerds - "OMG! Moving to Networking isn't as trivial as you make it seem!"
    etc, etc, etc

    Can you feel the rage of nerds? Seems to be planned to trigger the reactions ... good job Timmy and Dice. Makes me think Slashdot is equivalent to those trash newspapers in the aisle of the supermarket.

    --
    ...moving very slowly and winning footraces with smug satisfaction.
  60. 210k? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would'n even get out of bed for that money. What kind of shit do you code?

  61. Situation Management by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

    You should think about instead of going all the way to CCIE, go for a lower level Cisco. We support hundreds of physical servers, two data centers, and (I think) 8 SABRE mainframes; yet we have maybe 8-10 network engineers who are FTE employees. Better yet might be to branch out into an MS cert, and a VMWare cert or three. My location does a tremendous amount of virtual servers, like 20-50 blades on a rack with 10-15 VMs each. I haven't seen any of the virtual networking yet, but that really isn't within my job scope unless it has some severe issues...it's probably in there too. Yet some networking, combined with virtualization...toss in some ITIL, policy management, project management and you could leverage your current skill set and find a new niche. I've seen situation management positions at Goldmans starting at $250k for ITSM analysts positions, even a few around $300k...so you know if you where seriously looking you could find even higher pay.

    Since you already code, learning the ITIL process should be pretty easy. The VmWare you can practice in your home lab (you DO have a home lab, right? Cause if your going cisco you'll need one LOL) I never know what issues will crop up, sometimes it's a server with bad hardware, switch sup card going out, someone pushed a bad script that jacks up some Oracle databases, etc. It's also a path into management if you want, since you really get a chance to network with vendors, programmers, network engineers, clients, etc and have to really flow with the severity and get stuff fixed. ITIL is also a world-wide standard, many corps are moving to it to manage change.

    1. Re:Situation Management by ruir · · Score: 1

      You lost me at the joke of an MS cert. Really. What I can add is that at the moment, people with dev skills+networking+Linux are very hot in the market.

  62. The guy is crazy by PerlPunk · · Score: 1

    You want to switch a software engineering job paying you 210K / year?

    ARE YOU FREAKING CRAZY????

    1. Re:The guy is crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously. If you are making that much, you are likely an expert in your field and very bright. So why not switch fields to something fresh that you find more interesting and work for the intellectual satisfaction.

    2. Re:The guy is crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because it does not pay? IF he had some saving he could do that. I have a cushion savings and that allows me to stay in a more interesting lesser paying job.

  63. Re:$210K is an insane salary for a Software Engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that I come to think of it, the salary is so rare and the circumstance so odd (3 months savings to being out on the street), I would say that this is a troll article. Not genuine.

  64. Register what you spend by ruir · · Score: 1

    Man you seriously need to control your fixed income expenses. It is very easy to get lost in the day to day grind, and toast it all in eating out and bars every single day, cigs, coffees, small vices. Sport cars and all of that. You have to start controlling your OWN expenses. Since your are married, both of you need to control it. I propose a small experience. Get a smartphone app, or a sheet of paper, a xls, whatever suits you, and jot down the expenses of the next 30 days. Then analyze it with your wife and see where you can improve. Cut back while it makes a difference. Get advice from someone more conscious in the family. Often also are buddies with the same lack of self-restraint that down you with them. Do not delude yourself, you have to let go these people for the sake of your own.

    1. Re:Register what you spend by ruir · · Score: 2

      Budget by the year and not for the immediate. That several coffee a day habit could translate very well between 1000k-5000k thousand a year depending where you live and where you drink it. Save some vices only for the weekend. Be careful with eating out, it could well translate between 20k to 100k per year easily. And when I told to jot down the expenses it to carry a smart app or paper with you and jot down everything to the single penny.

    2. Re:Register what you spend by ruir · · Score: 2

      About letting go drinking buddies, this goes without saying. I enjoyed a lot the companion of someone that was more calmer and more socially apt than me. A lot. But the man and their circle of very amicable friends, they downed a bottle per night, per guy of whiskey, plus the grub that went down to "settle" it, every single day of the week. I had to let it go. Being an expat in a foreign, hot country was not easy, and I was no stranger to have a drink at the end of the night. He made a hell a lot of difference, however it was not a sustainable life in many ways. If you need to let go this kind of people, fake an health fad (I turned vegan), fake a minor disease and a need for a diet...whatever. But do it. Also your body will thank you. With 30 years the impact of abuse in a body is not yet noticeable.

    3. Re:Register what you spend by ruir · · Score: 1

      What is also the quality of your suits? I was no stranger to good suits (around 1.5k-2k with inflation in place), nowadays I get by with more modest clothing. Do not get into herd/peer pressure mentality of buying 4x4 for field activities, boats or planes. It is a trap, and the maintenance is very steep. If you absolutely insist on that, buy models and join a club that do some races or activities one time per month.

    4. Re:Register what you spend by ruir · · Score: 1

      Forget me for intruding again. Many people, and yourself are missing the obvious. You obviously and if you are lucky do not need a disaster for things to go wrong. Your kids wont stay that age forever. Let them grow, and you will start going into debt. And I am ignoring here inflation.

    5. Re:Register what you spend by ruir · · Score: 1

      I bet you hire people to clean your house, nannies, dunno what more. Habits wont change overnight and will probably stress out the marriage. Hire a housekeeper, fire the rest. You will save money.

    6. Re:Register what you spend by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      That several coffee a day habit could translate very well between 1000k-5000k thousand a year depending where you live and where you drink it.

      I know trendy coffee places are expensive, but no matter where you are $1 billion a year is a serious habit!

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    7. Re:Register what you spend by ruir · · Score: 1

      ;) yep, I noticed the error after I wrote, but nonetheless counted on people noticing it was 1k.

  65. Re:$210K is an insane salary for a Software Engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You realize you linked to the salary for Software Engineer I, right? As in... someone with zero experience. Try Software Engineer V, at least. Then you need to take into account that he's likely not in Kansas City but in somewhere like San Francisco or New York. Median salary in SF for Software Engineer V is apparently $156k, according to salary.com.

  66. What is the race and nationality of your woman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some put aside some monthly sum for their personal rainy days into hidden private accounts. Blacks and asians are known for "lending" money to the family. You cannot afford both, specially the later.

  67. How about actually answering the question? by ahpeterson · · Score: 1

    I must have misread the question because I could have sworn he wasn't asking for advice on how to budget his money.

    I actually did the opposite of what you did. Granted it was 15 years ago, but I was in core infrastructure networking and went into software. Not for any reasons of job security, but because I really wanted to get into some of the value that the network was delivering.

    However, since then a really interesting thing has happened. SDN has made the network into much more than the sorts of things a CCIE would do. There will still be jobs for network engineers in the traditional sense, but what you may want to explore is how you can use your software skills to help networks run better, because SDN is allowing networks to do things that OSPF, BGP and MPLS can only dream of. Getting an understanding of infrastructure networking (both from the LAN and WAN side) will only make you a better software engineer, and being a software engineer will also make you a better network engineer. To quote Wayne Gretzky (who was famously quoted by Steve Jobs), go where the puck will be, not where it is.

  68. Words fail me, so I'll paraphrase... by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    Dear Slashdot,

    I have a sweet high-paying job that might not last forever. Rather than risk losing it at some unknown time in the future and having to take a pay cut with a new job, should I just switch careers now and guarantee that I take a huge pay cut right away? PS., I'm barely scraping by now. I couldn't possibly support my family on less than the almost quarter million a year that I'm making now.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    1. Re:Words fail me, so I'll paraphrase... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a sweet high-paying job that might not last forever. Rather than risk losing it at some unknown time in the future and having to take a pay cut with a new job, should I just switch careers now and guarantee that I take a huge pay cut right away? PS., I'm barely scraping by now. I couldn't possibly support my family on less than the almost quarter million a year that I'm making now.

      Agreed. Don't switch jobs.

      However, you appear to be very well paid for your job. That's fantastic, but IMO you should not rely upon it continuing. Therefore, look at the median pay rate for someone with your experience/expertise in your area & take steps:

      1. Modify your monthly budget so that you could live of the median salary (or one that you could reasonably expect if you had to change jobs).
      2. Use the excess to build up savings (either liquid, or a form that could be liquidated quickly if necessary)
      3. Relax & enjoy your family

      Good luck with it all.

  69. People, grow up by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I couldn't find more than a handful of comments giving actual usable advice.
    I'd get a real financial advisor, these guys are not worth asking life questions from.
    Yes downvote me all you want, You all know it's true.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
  70. Like others... by servant · · Score: 1
    Sorry to re-iterate the now obvious. Learn to live on much less. Yes, it is hard to do. ... After your 3 or 6 months of living expenses stashed away in T-bills or cash equivalents you can get to on a moments notice, another 6 months in 'emergency' funds. ... Then stash all the left over nickles into investments. If you don't know what to do for investments, you could get over 50K available in cash, get with a money manager (I found Fidelity Professional Asset Management good, but there are others that are good. Just vet them first. ... I have found the expense more than worth the service, and that is after years of DIY.)
    .

    I told my kids to give away 10% (biblical yes, but I have found it helped me not to focus to much on money as the reason for life - life is for living, money is a tool, like a screwdriver or a hammer, to make life easier), save 20% (ROTH, IRA, 401K, with 1/3 tax paid, 2/3 tax deferred), save another 10% for short term savings (vacations, new car - pay cash, car insurance, house down payment, etc), live on the rest. If there is any left over, put it in short term savings. Don't take money out of IRAs or 401Ks for life expenses even as loans.

    All this is very fatherly advice, but it helped once I figured it out, it helped me and my family greatly. I hope you find what is best for you and yours.

    --
    ... "When you pry the source from my cold dead hands."
  71. Don't be so quick to judge... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He said he was making 210k--After Bonus--now. So he may not have been making it for the last 10 years and maybe his pre-bonus salary is like 165-170, with the bonus being not entirely predictable. Plus folks, you don't know what special needs there are in family, and the fact that he said he can't be more than 3 months without working doesn't mean he would be dead broke then. Just means that's what feels safe and reasonable to him. Apparently there are a lot of sour grapes here.

  72. Networking is safe? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many companies now have their software engineers do everything - all the networking, sys admin, DB admin, etc. No job is safe.

  73. Re:$210K is an insane salary for a Software Engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Software Engineer I would be for a software engineer right out of college. The OP said he has 10 years of experience.

  74. SDF and DevOps!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Combine the two worlds and get into Software Defined Networking!! :-)

    You might also want to look at DevOps....those two areas are hot!

    Good luck man.

  75. Have to agree with those re not switching by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    You should be maxing out your retirement investment (not in more than 10 percent company stock, 90 percent in a low cost index fund or ETF like Total Stock Market or S&P 500 or mid cap. And downsizing your expenses. Never have more than half of your assets in your house.

    But, sure, pick up network certifications on the side, that's a good move.

    A friend of mine is starting a Software Engineering internship, she's your eventual replacement (and is an American).

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  76. Not a terrible idea by KapUSMC · · Score: 1

    First off.... Wow, most of this thread is useless (not that I'm shocked). He doesn't state specifics on finances. I would say I can't "afford" to be out of work for more than 3 months too. In reality I put a ton of money away for retirement and kids college, and could probably make it a few years without working, but with my current retirement plans, I couldn't "afford" more time that either. It really doesn't give specifics on the financials and everyone is just speculating wildly. For the real question he asked... I switched from software to network engineering about a decade ago, because my then employer (the USMC) told me to, so there really wasn't an option. I found it interesting, and after transitioning to the private sector stayed on the networking side. While you can make that amount of money, you are starting in a new field lacking relevant experience. The 150k+ jobs are almost exclusively working in sales engineering, ISP, or a senior engineer at a very large enterprise. Even with a CCIE (which isn't exactly a small undertaking) the only position that you would likely get hired into is the sales side, the other two will likely require a large amount of work experience as well. The sales side is easier, because to be a Cisco requires certified personnel to receive "gold" and "silver" partner levels. A couple of side notes... Outsourcing and H1-B's are every bit as prevalent for network engineers as software engineers. They may not be bringing a ton of people in for 45k cable monkey jobs, but for the gusy in the 6 figure range... You betcha.. They are all over the place. And the potential for other onshore outsourcing is possible to. Verizon, AT&T, and BT take on huge clients every day that are outsourcing their networking. I think the best way ahead.... If networking interests you... You could stick with software and migrate toward one of the SDN platforms... Cisco ACI or VNX and hope its VHS and not Betamax... Or even worse, laserdisc and never gets adoption.

  77. clown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guys belongs in a circus, making that kind of money and thinking he can just waltz in as a CCIE he needs his head checked, expecially when he will have to jump down to a measly 50k as a junior.

    probably an ass hat troll