Slashdot Mirror


The Patriot Act May Be Dead For Good

HughPickens.com points out Shane Harris's report at The Daily Beast that when powerful spying authorities under the Patriot Act expire at the stroke of midnight Monday, as currently appears likely, they may never return. "Senators have been negotiating over whether to pass a House bill that would renew and tweak existing provisions in the long-controversial law, but if the sunset comes and the provisions are off the books, lawmakers in both chambers would be facing a vote to reinstate controversial surveillance authorities, which is an entirely different political calculation. ... Three major Patriot provisions are on the chopping block: so-called roving wiretaps, which let the government monitor one person's multiple electronic devices; the "lone-wolf" provision, which allows surveillance of someone who's not connected to a known terrorist group; and Section 215, which, among other things, the government uses to collect the records of all landline phone calls in the United States." Obama has been urging Congress to pass the Freedom Act, but not warning that the sky will fall if they don't. That may reflect a calculation on the president's part that the surveillance authorities aren't important enough to lose political capital fighting to keep them. Meanwhile with the Senate not slated to return to Washington until just hours before that deadline, opponents like Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) showing no signs of budging, and the House so far unwilling to bail out the upper chamber, the prospects for an eleventh-hour breakthrough look slim.

18 of 218 comments (clear)

  1. It won't die by weilawei · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They'll come up with some sort of emergency measure or other. Not a snowflake's chance in Hell this will die.

    1. Re:It won't die by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair, a snowflake in Hell has a pretty good chance of dying.

      In Dante's "Inferno" (Hell), the deeper in hell's levels, the colder it gets - at the ninth level, the worse, reserved for those committing betrayal, a frozen lake exist...

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    2. Re:It won't die by ganjadude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      difference being obama said alot of things

      rand is actually doing something

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    3. Re:It won't die by Livius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They'll come up with some sort of emergency measure or other. Not a snowflake's chance in Hell this will die.

      Of course it could die. They could replace it with something worse.

  2. Not a snowballs chance! by amxcoder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My weather app doesn't forcast Hell freezing over anytime soon, so I seriously doubt this is will be true. The politicians/government agencies all know a good thing when they see it. The Patriot Act gives them unfettered access to have huge budgets, grow bigger and add more departments, share information freely between unrelated agencies, spy on Americans all they want, collect data on everyone to use how they see fit, and all sorts of other goodness that big government types love.

    The power hungry folks in Washington will never let this die.

    1. Re:Not a snowballs chance! by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The very worst of it should be gone after this weekend. If so I'll celebrate. It's a victory even if the war isn't quite over.

  3. If they don't pass it by frovingslosh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they don't pass it then the government will just do all those things anyway. It's not like they are subject to the law or the constitution or anything.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  4. it can expire because they'll do it anyway by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They were collecting data before the Patriot Act, they will collect it after. As technology allows they will collect more and more. They will lie to congress, the courts, and most certainly to the public. However this is all known to have ready been done with absolute certainty thanks to Snowden. It's a sign that they are getting bolder, more willing to act without even a shred of cover of law. They no longer need to pretend for permission due to the Patriot Act. Thus it can be allowed to expire.

  5. Never should have been passed by mbone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good riddance.

    I remember that when the Patriot Act was first passed thinking that

    - this was obviously on someone's wet dream wish list (it was not so much written as released from the vaults) and

    - passing huge changes in security laws with little debate and less thought in the near panicked initial response to a terrorist attack is basically a good definition of what not to do in a crisis.

    Of course, that was before the Bush Administration invaded Iraq and showed us that purposeful stupidity can be worse than mindless stupidity.

  6. snowden ftw by Noah+Haders · · Score: 5, Insightful

    this is all because of one man who did a brave thing and was forced to flee his country for a hostile nation. history books will write of snowden as a hero.

  7. Notice the media slam this week on Rand Paul? by kartaron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From all over the media, political commentators have been slamming Rand Paul since the 'filibuster'. Not just competitive republicans running for office or stumping for their guy either. Fox news left him off the latest poll, Scarboro (former republican analyst) mocks him, Bill Kristol (ancient neocon acolyte) mocks him. Several editorial columns describe his maneuvering of the vote for renewing the patriot act as betrayal. Huffpo implied Rand's 'act' is so tedious that other senators roll their eyes.

    Amazing how this man is so derided for actually acting on one of the biggest issues of our time instead of just going along

  8. Strategy by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If a terrorist truly wanted to harm us, the best way they could do it would be to mount a showy but essentially superficial attack some place Monday morning right after this expired.

    The actual damage and injuries and deaths from the attack itself would probably be minuscule, but the self-inflicted damage and injuries and deaths caused by the U.S. doubling down on even tighter surveillance, more war on terror, and the loss of our freedoms that we say we're trying protect would gladden the hearts of many a terrorist. It is a strategy that has worked well for them since well before 9/11.

    Terrorists can't destroy us directly, but they're happy to let us do it to ourselves voluntarily.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:Strategy by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My mod points just expired, but this^

      9/11 was not Bin Laden's greatest success, the Patriot Act (and similar laws in other western countries) was.

      He scared people into gladly giving up their own freedom. How brilliant, and disturbingly easy, was that!

  9. Re:so what about all the *other* stuff? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As for the other activities, well, this is how spying gets done. That is how you spy on people in this day and age. With all of the justified criticism of the NSA, it would still be bad if they couldn't spy at all. They do, in fact, have a function to fulfill, and it is a function that needs fulfilling.

    Why don't you unpack that statement a little bit? What is the domestic function of the NSA?

    If you said anything besides, "It doesn't have a domestic function" then you are wrong. The US government is not supposed to be spying on US citizens. If there's some foreign government or organization that's communicating with an American citizen or permanent resident in order to commit a crime, just get a goddamned warrant.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  10. only takes 1 senator to filibuster & Rand Paul by raymorris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A single senator can filibuster a bill. Senator Rand Paul said he'd prevent it from passing before the Senate went on break, and he did so. Rand Paul is now saying he'll make sure it isn't passed on Sunday, and there's every reason to think he'll do so again, just like he did before.

    I'll be considering him carefully when I choose my presidential vote.

  11. Re:only takes 1 senator to filibuster & Rand P by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He'll never get the Republican nomination. Not a chance in hell. The old guard in the party would rather have Hillary Clinton than Rand Paul. She's less of a threat to them.

  12. Re:only takes 1 senator to filibuster & Rand P by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hillary would be the best republican since Eisenhower.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  13. Re:No thermal gradients in hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are no lawyers in Hell, lawyers as we all know are famously soulless. All of them are on Earth.