Slashdot Mirror


Netflix Is Experimenting With Advertising

derekmead writes: Netflix is experimenting with pre-roll and post-roll advertisements for some of its users. For now, it's just pitching it's own original programming. However, many are concerned that they plan to serve third-party ads, but the company says they have no plans to do so. They told Mashable in a statement: "We are not planning to test or implement third-party advertising on the Netflix service. For some time, we've teased Netflix originals with short trailers after a member finishes watching a show. Some members in a limited test now are seeing teases before a show begins. We test hundreds of potential improvements to the service every year. Many never extend beyond that."

19 of 318 comments (clear)

  1. In other words by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In other words, within a year or two we will be rolling out ads that you will be forced to watch before you can view the programming you pay a subscription fee for.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:In other words by JMJimmy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In other words, I'll be moving to the next service that does not advertise. Or just torrent/stream (with adblock of course).

    2. Re:In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This. I'm a loyal Netflix subscriber but if they start to run ads, I'll go back to torrents so fast it'll make their heads spin.

    3. Re: In other words by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd be up for it if they cut the price by 50% for those that are willing to see them, otherwise they can take their ads and shove them up their ass.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re: In other words by Qzukk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's doubly a pain to see the same ones when binge watching.

      Those are absolutely the worst. Watching the same preview the second time is almost as bad as when I pull out a years old DVD and have* to sit through ancient trailers before I can start watching the movie. By the third time I see the same preview the same day, it's worse.

      *: or use a non-compliant DVD player that allows skipping this shit. Either/or.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    5. Re: In other words by JMJimmy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd be up for it if they cut the price by 50% for those that are willing to see them, otherwise they can take their ads and shove them up their ass.

      That's the slippery slope that led to Cable TV.

    6. Re: In other words by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's the slippery slope that led to Cable TV.

      Really? Somehow it seems that it was the cable co's saying one thing, and doing something completely opposite. That's not a slippery slope, it's outright lying.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    7. Re:In other words by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But we're ALREADY paying Netflix. They don't need ad revenue to fund their servers, they're not just some wannabe journalist blogger whining about the lack of donations. Advertisements plus a subscription is just stupid, or evil, or both. Same with cable tv, but there we could easily fast forward past the ads and never see them (the evil ad industry even sued replaytv over this capability).

      Post-show ads are ok, we can skip those. Ads on their homepage is fine. They can even have a special "Netflix Originals" category (which I suspect some people would like). But non-skippable pre show ads would drive away a non-trivial segment of their subscribers, including quite a lot of people who decided on Netflix over Hulu-Plus.

      Netflix needs to remember that we cut the cord once already, we can cut it a second time if needed. People are assuming we must watch the shows, but it's not true and we've learned to cut back. Anyone already using torrent is probably not concerned about being legal with netflix anyway.

    8. Re: In other words by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Same here. I pay Netflix for ad free viewing.

      I will stop paying for netflix when it's not ad free viewing.

      Ads are meant to pay for shows. I should not be forced to pay to watch ads.

      We cut the cord because of ads - not because we're willing to pay for ad free content. If comcast served up all of its content adfree - I'd jump right into comcast.

      It's that simple.

      Free TV can have ads.

      Commercial free tv can charge for content.

      This is what the consumer wants.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  2. I remember when... by linear+a · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ah ... I remember when cable TV started putting ads in. Didn't turn out pretty.

  3. No by Imagix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just, no. Slippery slope. It starts with ads for it's own stuff. Followed by ads from "selected" partners. I've paid my subscription fee. No ads.

  4. What about product placement ads? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To claim Netflix doesn't advertise omits a very background, but present form of advertising. It's called product placement, and it's where instead of buying some generic Cola or use a generic computer, or random cellphone, they clearly show it's a Coca-Cola, or an Apple iMac or a Samsung. If you ever wonder why they show closeups of a phone's screen or something, it's usually to show the logo for a second or two. Normally they'd just have the actor say it out loud (oh look, a call from Dad, etc), but if it's a product placement, you'll see a closeup on screen with "Dad" printed on it.

    And really, I'd be surprised if Netflix's original shows aren't doing this - it's been generally marked as the least objectionable form of advertising because it adds realism (who drinks Cola? You know it's either a Coke or a Pepsi), and sometimes, the efforts of hiding logos is just plain silly.

    And it's usually done during the writing stages where the show producers generally solicit sponsorship.

    I know Netflix doesn't currently run normal commercials other than brief clips of other Netflix originals, but I'd be surprised if they aren't doing the product placement thing.

  5. Google Play, Netflix by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google Play placed ads at the beginning of Archer episodes. It pissed by off considerably. I pay good money to NOT see commercials. Being force-fed ads when I paid for something (a movie ticket, a Google Play video, etc.) is about the surest way to get me to stop paying you money.

    Seriously, fuck you Google. And if you do this, fuck you Netflix too.

  6. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not fucking entitlement, it's recognizing what you're paying for. ADS for a PAID SERVICE is DOUBLE DIPPING. Full stop. Cable is just as scummy, and the only reason the companies get away with it is that TV is a widespread addiction stronger than heroin.

  7. Re:Exactly. by ArchieBunker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe because the original intent of cable tv was you paid a subscription which pays for the shows. No advertisements needed. The big networks still broadcast over the air for free. If you bring in advertising then you clearly don't need my subscription costs.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  8. Re:Exactly. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    cable tv you see ads.

    You know Cable TV started on the premise of "no ads", right? Now they have nothing but ad channels. The 80s were a glorious, ad free, time all supported by your monthly payment.

  9. Re:I could live with a post-show teaser... by ghjm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And my axe. Get off it also.

  10. Netflix Is Experimenting With Advertising by Snufu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bye Netflix. It was fun while it lasted.

  11. Re:I could live with a post-show teaser... by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yep, I grew up in a country town that is now an outer suburb of Melbourne. Saturday afternoons was the "$0.20 children's matinee" at the local theater, first we got a couple of cartoons, then everyone stood quietly to attention for "god save the queen", then John Wayne would come on and there was a roar of delight from the crowd, then we all start playing cowboys and indians in the theater. The adult staff did not try to control our behaviour, except to make sure we all stood quietly for the national anthem ( if you were silly enough to be sitting down an usher would come over and lift you to your feet by your ear), no child was ever thrown out, and we took full advantage of that policy. :).

    Somewhat ironic that my first memory of "freedom".is being locked in a large padded room with 100 kids and John Wayne. Still, it worked out great from a social POV, everyone shopped on Saturday morning because the shops were closed Saturday afternoon and all day Sunday, so after "shopping with the kids", the kids got to burn off their energy and mum and dad got a quiet afternoon to restore theirs.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.