Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Will Be Free To Users Who Test It

An anonymous reader writes: Microsoft has been making a big push to change its business model for Windows — likely due to the low/no cost updates you can get for competing operating systems. The company surprised everyone when it said legit copies of Windows 7 and 8 would be supplied with free upgrades, but now they're extending that even further: anyone who tests the Windows 10 Technical Preview will get a free upgrade to the full version of Windows 10 when it comes out. In a blog post, Microsoft's Gabe Aul said, "As long as you are running an Insider Preview build and connected with the [Microsoft account] you used to register, you will receive the Windows 10 final release build and remain activated. Once you have successfully installed this build and activated, you will also be able to clean install on that PC from final media if you want to start over fresh."

177 of 281 comments (clear)

  1. But I pirated Windows 7 Ultimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will I get Windows 10 Ultimate??

    1. Re:But I pirated Windows 7 Ultimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Will I get Windows 10 Ultimate??

      Yes, you will. As a punishment.

    2. Re:But I pirated Windows 7 Ultimate by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Do you have a little nag icon on your taskbar that says, "Get Windows 10"?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    3. Re:But I pirated Windows 7 Ultimate by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      No, I managed to get rid of it.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    4. Re: But I pirated Windows 7 Ultimate by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      When I saw the headline, I immediately thought "Buy that'll be everybody who runs it...!"

  2. So that means it's free to everyone by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because we've all been beta-testing Windows since forever.

    1. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by jasmusic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because we've all been beta-testing Windows since forever.

      Wait till someone lets you in on the secret of Linux.

    2. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Because we've all been beta-testing Windows since forever.

      Wait till someone lets you in on the secret of Linux.

      Wait until you get your refund from Linux.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      only if you install windows 10 preview and give in to the online requirement and link your windows to a microsoft account

      That might be because it's a tech preview explicitly meant for people who are willing to test it. Reporting back information to Microsoft is the entire fucking point.

      Windows 10 RTM will have no such requirement.

    4. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by echnaton192 · · Score: 2

      I would vote you up if I had modpoints today.

      The upgrades from the full systems pop up whether the useraccount is linked to the microsoft account or if you simply created a user on Windows 7.

      And yes, if someone signs up specifically for a beta program were every click is analyzed and any feedback linked to an account I think it is OK to get the free copy connected to that account. Because this copy is free (as in beer, but not as in speech).

      It does not upgrade a bought copy. The alternative would be that every installation of the beta gets a free copy, even if the user did not participate in the beta program.

      I hated MS for diversifying the directx-bases because every new directx was only available if the user bought the newest windows. They nearly destroyed the pc as a gaming machine in order to push their xbox. They were evil in general and their monopolistic behaviour was illegal. They tried to kill Linux by FUD.

      The free copy is the right thing to do to atone for the abomination that was windows 8 or even 8.1 (two different userinterfaces for account settings, nuff said). And a free copy for every one who beta tested seems fair. Even non genuine windows installs get the upgrade, but there will be nagging.

    5. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that. Since Windows 3.11, 95, 98, 98SE, 2000, XP, Vista, 7 and 8. Only a fool would have installed Windows ME.

    6. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      I'd add Vista and 8/8.1 to that. 7 is not that bad, but XP was faster on same hardware. ME? only thing it had for it it rebooted really fast after bluescreening :p

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    7. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think Microsoft is giving 10 away to appease users of 8. I think they want to avoid 7 turning into another XP where a crapload of users stick with it so it is hard for them to ditch it, and they end up having to support it for 14 years. That will ROYALLY screw up their "Windows 10 is the final Windows" plan, which I *think* means they plan to charge an annual fee for it (the other shoe for Windows' future licensing model has yet to drop, and I think they expect that most people will hate it, but that they'll hate it only after it's already too late.)

      However it would be silly to give it to users of Windows 7 but not users of Windows 8, so they're just giving it to both.

    8. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by mrprogrammerman · · Score: 1

      It's also the fact they want to get faster adoption of their universal app platform in Windows 10. If there are no users, developers won't develop for it. Giving it away for free helps to increase the user base so developers will consider it. Also they're now going to be able to make money from Win7 users via the app store.

    9. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by jazzis · · Score: 1

      Is that you pf?

    10. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by davester666 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      you got a free copy of Linux? where the hell do you pirate it from?

      i've searched everywhere and can't find one anywhere.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    11. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by Malfuros+the+Wizard · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sorry, I work in a restrictive FCA and PCI compliant environment. (Think card processing/banking type environments). I do have Windows 10 running in a secure sandbox, giving it internet access is a PITA, so many hoops. It's already been decided, Windows 10 due to the sheer number of activities it wants to perform which are internet based is too insecure and bleeds too much data to the web to be allowed into our environment. Windows 7 is where we are for the foreseeable future until Microsoft stop chasing the consumer and present corporates with a secure operating system that doesn't want to do everything on the internet. If the final version allows us to disable all that internet crap then we may re-evaluate but until then our minds are made up. Apologies for the wall of text, some filter somewhere on my network appears to be stripping something out.

    12. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by dbIII · · Score: 1

      They nearly destroyed the pc as a gaming machine in order to push their xbox

      The pop-ups and even reboots in the middle of full screen games are finally explained!

    13. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I think they want to avoid 7 turning into another XP where a crapload of users stick with it so it is hard for them to ditch it, and they end up having to support it for 14 years

      Too late. There is only one person in my workplace that wants the tile interface and that's a person that already has it on a home PC. With the change to tiles I suspect a lot of people are going to stay on Win7 just to have a desktop that they are used to (and not the fucking insane idea of invisible controls hidden off screen).

    14. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by lokedhs · · Score: 1

      I tried, but SCO didn't want to listen.

    15. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Haven't been following it too closely, but I don't really see the new start menu as all that inspiring. I think that Win7 was a genuine improvement over XP. Having an in-focus search box when you hit the start key was actually a bit like having a command line, etc.

      All those tiles just make everything appear less distinct and harder to find, and it seems like I'll be able to fit less stuff on my screen.

    16. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Giving it away for free helps to increase the user base

      Can anyone think of another kind of business that does that?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by wassomeyob · · Score: 1

      Only a fool would have installed Windows ME.

      I did. About 1000 times. Re-installs.

    18. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe it's about time for you guys to consider alternatives to Windows? It sounds like it's not exactly the right tool for the job.

    19. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by echnaton192 · · Score: 1

      Haha.

      For instance, MS bought the company that was about to make the best looking game at the time for the PC and made it xbox-exclusive for years. And they did a lot of "xbox-exclusives", that would have run better on their own f...ing OS than it would ever on the xbox. An OS people paid for. And considering "pro" and "ultimate" it wasn't that small of an amount.

      The the diversification of the installed directx-versions by making the newest directx exclusive to their newest OS was stupid and destructive for the pc as a gaming machine as well. In order to lure some hard core pc gamers to buy their newest OS (we are not that many) they degraded the experience for anybody else. This made the technical game support even more to a nightmare than it was before, when every Windows still supported would get the newest directx.

      Oh yes, the xbox-controller is available for windows. But the driver does not even support the f...cking power off button. Switching between wasd and the controller? Go to the menu of the game and switch the controller off or don't be annoyed by the force feedback-vibrations on your desk or take the battery out.

      Yes, the decline in pcgames was partly because people don't want to deal with all the hassle before a game starts on a pc. And many are fine with a tablet for browsing the internet, so the pc basis was reduced. But MS did anything it could to make pc games even more frustrating. For short term profits.

      But MS is not apple, they mainly sell Software. So I understand that they limit windows 10 to already paying customers or registered beta testers instead of the whole world.

    20. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by Black+LED · · Score: 1

      The point made was that there will be a product key involved. They have to send you that, and they only do that if you preview 10 with a Microsoft account. That being the case, it's a simple matter for then to store which keys went with which account.

      Clean installs are irrelevant. Being a local user is irrelevant. If you buy or are given anything online that needs activating with a unique key, it's its origin can always be traced back to you.

      Uh, no. You don't have to provide any self-identifying information to create a Microsoft account and local accounts aren't accessible by Microsoft.

      Sorry, but you fail. Try again.

    21. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by Golden_Rider · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I work in a restrictive FCA and PCI compliant environment. (Think card processing/banking type environments).
      I do have Windows 10 running in a secure sandbox, giving it internet access is a PITA, so many hoops.
      It's already been decided, Windows 10 due to the sheer number of activities it wants to perform which are internet based is too insecure and bleeds too much data to the web to be allowed into our environment.

      So you based your decision on whether Windows 10 is appropriate for your environment or sends too much information to the Internet on a technical preview which clearly states in the user agreement that it regularly sends usage information about everything back to Microsoft, because it is a technical preview and wants to collect usage data. Got it.

    22. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      You don't get to tout how great Linux is then pull the 'you get what you paid for' nonsense when it falls short. One or the other, not both.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    23. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Why is this modded down? I remember people here anxiously awaiting a four-core Android phone with dreams of finally getting smooth scrolling.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    24. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Not just Microsoft which is one thing but it advertises itself aggressively on the network, similarly discovery and pulls in a lot of data from 'apps' and 'tiles'

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    25. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      To this day, I can't find one asshole on line that trolls about Windows ME yet can name one specific technical problem they had with it, yourself included.

      As a video game tester when Windows ME came out, it had horrible video game support. This was a time when DOS games were more common than Windows games. Hence, I'll quote Wikipedia on the technical fault.

      Windows ME is a continuation of the Windows 9x model, but with restricted access to real mode MS-DOS in order to decrease system boot time.[8] This was one of the most unpopular changes in Windows ME, because applications that needed real mode DOS to run, such as older disk utilities, did not run under Windows ME (although the system could either be booted into real mode DOS using a bootable Windows ME floppy disk or the configuration could be tweaked manually to reenable access to the underlying MS-DOS).

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_ME

    26. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Meh... I will give you ten bucks but proving it is you is going to be a problem.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    27. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You can start typing in the search in Vista too. I just checked. Just press the WinKey and type away - focus is already on search. Yes, I do still have a laptop that has Vista on it.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    28. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by KGIII · · Score: 1

      If it is anything like other Windows versions just turn off the guest account, wait a second, and turn it back on. You do not even have to logout or reboot in other, older, Windows versions.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    29. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by KGIII · · Score: 1

      That seems like a lot of mental gymnastics just to find a reason to be angry. What is your motive? It is obvious that you have not used this, so what are you trying to accomplish? Just speak your mind and be honest. It is okay to say, "I do not recommend Microsoft because of their..." (Say, business practices, lack of support for FOSS, history, or the color of their icons.) Really! It is perfectly okay to say those things (or any others that you come up with) but do so honestly and openly and you will likely find a more receptive audience.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    30. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I had ME and really enjoyed it - on one machine. It simply ran very well on that one box that it came standard with. The box even said it was made for Windows ME. It was an Acer something or other. It had an AMD K6 II at 350 Mhz. It was comfortable overclocked to a bit over 500 Mhz. It was stable and ran quite well. At one point, it was a bit old by then, I had an OpenNap hub (connecting multiple servers) running on it and often went many months without rebooting. It ran the hub for quite a while actually and then I got a visit from a TLA (no arrest or anything - just some questions and no, no, they can not come inside and maybe I should call my lawyer before answering any questions - etc...) and I decided it was time to take it down.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    31. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by K10W · · Score: 1

      I would vote you up if I had modpoints today.

      The upgrades from the full systems pop up whether the useraccount is linked to the microsoft account or if you simply created a user on Windows 7.

      And yes, if someone signs up specifically for a beta program were every click is analyzed and any feedback linked to an account I think it is OK to get the free copy connected to that account. Because this copy is free (as in beer, but not as in speech).

      It does not upgrade a bought copy. The alternative would be that every installation of the beta gets a free copy, even if the user did not participate in the beta program.

      I hated MS for diversifying the directx-bases because every new directx was only available if the user bought the newest windows. They nearly destroyed the pc as a gaming machine in order to push their xbox. They were evil in general and their monopolistic behaviour was illegal. They tried to kill Linux by FUD.

      The free copy is the right thing to do to atone for the abomination that was windows 8 or even 8.1 (two different userinterfaces for account settings, nuff said). And a free copy for every one who beta tested seems fair. Even non genuine windows installs get the upgrade, but there will be nagging.

      I don't see much change in their behaviour myself. Could be wrong but way it looks to me is free isn't a usable experience liked genuine (business) customers will get. Testing is going to be the suckers who buy into it and updates forced on those users with MS stating after months of testing on home versions it will be rolled out on the real customers machines. Months makes it sound liek they are releasing it with barely any testing done inhouse. Way to make people work for free, not sure that is how it will work but my gut says maybe ;)

    32. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      So basically, either you don't have an IT dept, or they're to lazy to bother creating local accounts.

      It's insanely easy to create local accounts on Windows 10. Far, far easier than it was under Windows 8. It even gives you hints along the way about how to do it. Contrast that with Windows 8, where you literally had to skip past account creation and look for the "Create local account" button at the bottom of the screen. So if anything, Windows 10 makes it easier to avoid going online than Windows 8 did.

      I don't know about disabling services, but I don't think it's any harder to do than it was in Windows 8 or Windows 7.

    33. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      It's a fine tool for the job, but it sounds like their IT are being lazy.

      A PCI compliant environment has to have everything audited and documented. Auditing has to be done every quarter and documentation has to be reviewed every 6 months. In other words, it's a lot of work. It doesn't matter what OS is used, it takes a lot of time and effort. So in order to implement Windows 10 (or anything else for that matter), services have to be audited, permissions documented, any GPO changes must be documented and audited.

      If that's the environment, they're probably waiting for Windows 10 to either become a business requirement or they're waiting for their next audit/documentation review period.

    34. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by armanox · · Score: 1

      Depends on what GP means as the same hardware. On my P3 laptop with 1GB of RAM? XP is faster. On an i7? Windows 7 (and newer) is much faster then XP.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    35. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by armanox · · Score: 1

      ME had an issue if you mixed drivers, since they could trample each other (ME supported DOS drivers, Windows 9x drivers, and Windows 2K drivers, which all didn't play nice with each other). There was also the issue with data loss if your HDD supported caching, which was later patched. If you avoided mixing drivers (so probably didn't keep that old Sound Blaster 16 in use OR do pure DOS mode stuff, which ME didn't like doing any more anyway), and got the HDD cache issue solved, it was a solid system in my experience.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    36. Re: So that means it's free to everyone by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The old start menu gives you a tree of all the major stuff that is installed.
      MS has spent years effectively training people to use that interface and now people have to remember what they want instead of looking in the tree for that application they used last year or even earlier.
      That's a bit of a step backwards with the interface IMHO. Not as batshit insane as putting controls offscreen, but it seems to annoy people just the same.

    37. Re:So that means it's free to everyone by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      I have attached the refund $0 with this post. Enjoy.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  3. meh by mike2006 · · Score: 1

    Who wants to trash a valid working version of 7 or 8 rather than beta test a fresh install of Windows 10. This would be great if the free license was for those who install and beta test a fresh version of Windows 10 on a PC without having to upgrade an existing copy first.

    1. Re:meh by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      You already get to upgrade to 10 for free if you're running 7 or 8.
      This offer would be targeting the people on older platforms without and existing upgrade path. Still running XP? Beta test 10 and get it for free. (Course if you're still running XP you'd probably like to get new hardware now anyway).

    2. Re:meh by WilCompute · · Score: 1

      You can install a clean install of the Insider Builds, then upgrade and have an activated version of Windows 10. That is the exact wording that was used in the blog. It simply stated you had to be running an Insider Build, and when you upgraded, Windows 10 would be activated. No other requirement.

      --
      NDxTreme Content on the Edge.
    3. Re:meh by Golden_Rider · · Score: 1

      Who wants to trash a valid working version of 7 or 8 rather than beta test a fresh install of Windows 10. This would be great if the free license was for those who install and beta test a fresh version of Windows 10 on a PC without having to upgrade an existing copy first.

      Well, lucky you - because that is exactly how it is. You download the (free) technical preview build ISO http://windows.microsoft.com/e..., install it, and then later on it will be upgraded to a (free) fully licensed copy. Only requirement is that you have to sign up for a Microsoft account (just create some new email address for that).

      Or, in easier words, the full version of Windows 10 is free for everybody who participates in the technical preview.

    4. Re:meh by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Thanks. The Verge says that

      Update, June 21st 9:45AM: Microsoft has updated its blog post today and removed references to "remain activated." The stealthy edit isn't acknowledged, and we've reached out to the company for comment.

      Do you have any updates since then?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  4. Clean install from final media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    By "final media" do they mean bittorrent? Because that's where I've historically gotten all of my windows media from

  5. Desperation by Dunbal · · Score: 2

    Can't even give it away huh?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Desperation by PNutts · · Score: 2

      FREE is too expensive! When they offer me a free computer and pay me $50 per hour to beta test their crapware, then I'll bite. Until then, I'll continue to use Linux Mint because it Just Works

      Linux Mint currently has 3853 open bugs.

    2. Re:Desperation by Altrag · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I'd call it "desperation" so much as "recognizing a changing landscape." Its hard to compete with free (Linux) and Apple's essentially giving away OSX with their hardware as well. Windows is the only major OS you still pay for these days.

      And really, its not all that much skin off their backs. Probably 90+% of people who already have Windows will never upgrade it until/unless they upgrade the entire computer with a preinstalled OEM version. Not that I have any insider info, but I would guess that off-the-shelf sales of Windows are miniscule compared to the OEM and other commercial contracts. Hell the second most common version of Windows is still XP http://www.netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=10&qpcustomd=0, 14 years later and long after support was cut off!

      Plus, they're still pushing their mobile-integrated (and now XBox-integrated) unified platform idea, so the more people they get on the new Windows (even with Metro being less obnoxious,) the more people they might convince to buy mobile Windows products (and more to the point, start buying stuff from the Windows store which is near-free money once they convince developers enough to put stuff up there and get enough users to buy stuff that the store can become self-sustaining.)

    3. Re:Desperation by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Plus, they're still pushing their mobile-integrated (and now XBox-integrated) unified platform idea,

      I am absolutely certain they are banking on that whole idea succeeding. Personally, I am not at all interested in updating my Windows 7 desktop or laptop, but I can't wait for the Windows 10 update for my Asus Transformer tablet.

      All Microsoft really has to do is get users to pick up a modern Windows tablet and use it for a little while, and they'll never go back to an Android Tablet, except for the apps library and what Play Store games they are already sucked into playing. There are very affordable Win 8 tablets from a number of mid-range vendors like Asus and Dell that are going to kill Android tablets and maybe, hopefully, the iPad. Who wants to run a toy OS if there's a real one out there that is even relatively open and will run any x86 app or application?

    4. Re:Desperation by tsotha · · Score: 1

      Apple giving away IOS makes some sense because Apple is trying to sell you hardware. What is Microsoft trying to sell me that will cover a major OS version upgrade? I don't see it.

    5. Re: Desperation by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly little for an entire OS ecosystem (those bugs include packaged software). I wish there were only 3k bugs and minor annoyances on other platforms.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    6. Re: Desperation by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Office 365, Sharepoint, Exchange and associated CAL's. Windows Server alone runs in the $1000/CPU

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  6. Because Microsoft laid off their QA team last fall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not really all that surprising that MS wants additional testing badly enough to give away copies of Win10 for free to get it. Remember the fact that part of Microsoft's 2014 layoffs included elimination of all the SDETs in the Windows division. Those that were deemed worthy to stay were converted to SDEs and the rest were told to hit the road.

    Needless to say, the result is likely to be exactly what one would expect of canning the entire test team suddenly, if the state of the technical previews has been any indication...

  7. Re:not interested...unless. by blackpaw · · Score: 2

    Dunno what your problem was - I've been running Windows 10 via KVM and VirtualBox since 10041. Works well with the KVM virtio drivers.

  8. I smell a rat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have a bad feeling about Windows 10. Maybe it's just my paranoia working over-time.

    1. Re:I smell a rat... by tsotha · · Score: 1

      Nah, that's just experience talking. Every other version of windows has been usable, with the intervening ones garbage. By going from Windows 8 to Windows 10 Microsoft is letting us know they plan on skipping the good one this time around.

  9. Enough already. by westlake · · Score: 1

    I see we now have a balloon, a stained glass window icon and the real-life Microsoft logo appearing in-line with the headline.
    Thankfully without obscuring the text. This time.

    1. Re:Enough already. by alexhs · · Score: 1

      It's actually the old Microsoft logo. The new one is basically like the stained glass window, without the window frame.
      And if you "want" the logos to obscure the text, you just have to narrow your window width to a size of 950 pixels or less :)

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
  10. But by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Then my computer will have Windows 10??

  11. Locked to one PC? by Snufu · · Score: 1

    "...you will also be able to clean install on *that* PC from final media if you want to start over fresh."

    What if I get a new computer or upgrade my CPU/motherboard?

    1. Re:Locked to one PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's probably the same as the 7/8 upgrade which is locked to the mobo, so they would need to buy a new copy.

    2. Re:Locked to one PC? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I quite agree. I have been beta testing the preview edition for the last few months. A few days ago, Microsoft included the new Windows logo in the status section of the Windows 7 & 8 toolbars, which if clicked prompt people to reserve their copies. I went to the local Microsoft store and asked them about it on my Winbook, and was told that I'd have to reinstall 8.1 and then upgrade. Which is ridiculous - going from Preview Edition to the Release version should be as simple as a Windows update. Nothing more, nothing less!

      On the promo itself, there are a couple of things Microsoft should give those of us who beta tested for them. (I even posted comments on some of the apps that either were too brittle, or could use improved features.)

      1. 1. Have a feature that would allow us to create a media w/ a legit copy of Windows 10
      2. 2. Allow us to use that copy on up to N computers (where 5

      Do that, and I'll feel appreciated. Otherwise, why pretend that those who voluntarily risked a beta version on their computers and tested Windows will be given any better treatment than those who just went about their business until July 29th?

    3. Re:Locked to one PC? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Peh. I just called MS and they re-authorized the serial I had. It took me no more than 5 minutes on the phone for them to give me the counter-challenge for it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Locked to one PC? by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      It took me no more than 5 minutes on the phone for them to give me the counter-challenge for it.

      I just installed a new copy of Kubuntu on five computers, and I didn't have to spend even one second asking for permission to do so.

    5. Re:Locked to one PC? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I just installed a new copy of Kubuntu on five computers, and I didn't have to spend even one second asking for permission to do so.

      That's great, when I do a deployment I can do it across 450 machines at a time and don't have to ask permission either. Shocking!

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re: Locked to one PC? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Actually you do. Microsoft actually recommends you install an authorization proxy (several $1000 in Windows Server) to activate your "Enterprise" versions. I am on a network that cannot reach said servers and every Win7+ Enterprise install expires about a month after installation after which I have to run an arcane command or call Microsoft to activate. That is with the key and activation commands baked into the image.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    7. Re: Locked to one PC? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Recommends != require

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    8. Re: Locked to one PC? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      But if you don't you're in shit-town where you have to manually re-activate (ask permission from Microsoft to use your software) individual installs a month after installation.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    9. Re: Locked to one PC? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      But if you don't you're in shit-town where you have to manually re-activate (ask permission from Microsoft to use your software) individual installs a month after installation.

      Uh no. You know the deployment kit can do this across all the machines in about 15 seconds right?

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re: Locked to one PC? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Again, you need to purchase Microsoft SCCM ($$$) to make it work. I use the deployment kit to make the images, that part is free. The part that doesn't work is where it deactivates itself again a month after deployment because it can't reach a Microsoft Server.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  12. Connected? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    build and connected with the [Microsoft account] you used to register, you will receive the Windows 10 final release build and remain activated.

    Is this like Windows 8 where it nags you to sign in with a @msn or @hotmail account?
    Because I'm very much uninterested in having Microsoft follow along with my daily activities.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Connected? by terbo · · Score: 1

      Is this like Windows 8 where it nags you to sign in with a @msn or @hotmail account?
      Because I'm very much uninterested in having Microsoft follow along with my daily activities.

      More than that; using their browser, their search engine and local search facility,
      their anti-virus, all send copious amounts of information to Megasoft.
      Using the default settings sends numerous types of data over the wire.

      --
      If you're interested in facts I'll tell you what they are and I'll give you sources - Chomsky on The Big Idea
    2. Re:Connected? by vux984 · · Score: 2

      No you don't. You can use a local account; and still use the app store. I've both 8.1 and the 10 tech preview setup like that.

    3. Re:Connected? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 asks if you want a Microsoft account or a local account exactly once during installation

      Ok. This isn't quite true. Windows 8 -assumes- you want a microsoft account, and makes the option of using a local account, more than little non-obvious.

      Apple, for what its worth isn't any better.

      and never bothers you about it again.

      Also not quite true; various interactions with the store require you to sign into the store; and if you are not paying attention, the default path the wizard takes you down will convert your local account into a microsoft account. It warns you this is going to happen, but if your not paying attention you can end up with a microsoft account after installing with a local one.

      You must have got drunk, passed out and dreamt about the nags.

      If you never use the app store, you won't see any nags. But if you do, it will prompt you to sign in to the store with your ms account; and it will "helpfully" suggest you switch your account to a microsoft account to make your life "better".

    4. Re:Connected? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I own a surface and as annoying as using this for my hotmail account it is really nice to have Office 365, Onedrive, favorites, and even desktop wallpapers and settings synced together. Even if you use Android you can gain the cloud functionality portion and MS office too!

      MS doesn't track your daily activities. The purpose is to get you on Onedrive and it's cloud offerings. You are free to use it or not. I use it because it is included. I have a truecrypt container I put on it for important files encrypted to be on the safe side for my passwords file and tax returns etc.

  13. Re:I'm suspicious. by terbo · · Score: 1

    "It will be free for XXXX" they are not showing you the fine print which says "for the first 90 days."

    I'm skeptical.

    Its not quite that - more that "free" in this case means "in exchange for unprecedented amounts of your personal information."

    --
    If you're interested in facts I'll tell you what they are and I'll give you sources - Chomsky on The Big Idea
  14. yes ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... I'm sure the PC makers would love it if I would "upgrade" to Windows 10, discover that my PC just won't cut it, and then buy a new PC (which coincidentally will have Windows 10 bundled).

    1. Re:yes ... by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Informative

      If your PC runs Windows 7 it'll run Windows 10. There have been no increase in performance requirements in the past 3 versions of windows. In fact Windows 8, 8.1 and 10 are working on ever increasing memory and CPU efficiency.

    2. Re:yes ... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      If your PC runs Windows 7 it'll run Windows 10. There have been no increase in performance requirements in the past 3 versions of windows. In fact Windows 8, 8.1 and 10 are working on ever increasing memory and CPU efficiency.

      Not true. It requires UEFI 2.3.1 with CSM bios turned off.

      Unless I misread something. If you have a 2011 era computer with a bios with no EFI your options are 8.1 or 7 until they go EOL. Any new pc from 2013 or later should have them but I have not seen much at all in 2012 or earlier besides some botique boards and imacs that had UEFI 2.3.1.

    3. Re:yes ... by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Jury is out.

      It looks like to get a Windows certification OEMs *must* ship with UEFI 2.3.1 and with Secure Boot enabled by default. It also looks like they've removed the requirement that Secure Boot must be selectable on x86 architectures (which is a backtrack and potentially a problem for Linux). Also it appears that this requirement will only be enforced after 1 year from the Windows 10 release. This is based on replies on the Microsoft Forums.

      Currently the technical preview has no problem running under Legacy BIOS (actually people are having more problems installing it on UEFI BIOSes based on forum complaints.

      That said some of the media sites are reporting that UEFI is not optional, but I can't find anything on the Microsoft site to say that.

    4. Re:yes ... by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Since I just finished installing a copy on a 2010 machine(Asus board first gen USB3 w/AMD965BE) that only had a BIOS, pretty sure it seems to be working just fine.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:yes ... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Not true at all. I have been able to install the Windows 10 Technical Preview to all sorts of crusty old PCs that have not heard about EFI or even 64-bit.

  15. Re:not interested...unless. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Dunno what your problem was - I've been running Windows 10 via KVM and VirtualBox since 10041. Works well with the KVM virtio drivers.

    One real problem is once you "upgrade" to Windows 10 from say Windows 7 - there is no going back Having checked it out on their website, My Windows 7 copy is no longer registrable.

    So if Windows 10 is the steaming smelly pile of elephant shit that Windows 8 is, I would have no choice than to buy another copy of Windows 7 Pro.

    I'm not going to spend good money beta testing that one way trip.

    I think I might wait until about day 364 to decide if I want that free upgrade or downgrade as the case may be.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  16. Re:Easy solution... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    ... just don't install it on hardware.

    When you register it, your Windows 7 hardware install is no longer "Genuine Microsoft". But if you want to donate one of yours......

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  17. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Can't most X11 window managers in Linux distros be configured to look similar enough to Windows to feel like "home"?

    Yes, I have a Linux Mint install configured to look and mostly act like XP. It's still Linux underneath. An XP or W7 user would be able to find their way around, until they operned a terminal.

    I haven't seen any W7 imitations, but I wouldn't be surprised.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  18. Re:Easy solution... by markus · · Score: 1

    Have you tried calling Microsoft's customer support about this? In the past, they have always been super friendly whenever I talked to them. They know that their licensing is super confusing and it is easily possible to trip up the automated license enforcement mechanisms. But in my experience they are usually willing to work with you. If your complaint sounds at least somewhat plausible, they will either figure out how to undo the damage you did, or they will send you a new license.

    Of course, if you just make up bull shit to try to get a free license for the copy of Windows that you downloaded from Bittorrent, don't expect that they'll be able or willing to help.

  19. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by michrech · · Score: 1

    Only if they can play all the Windows-only games that exist, and since Linux cannot, it will not take off like people such as yourself would like...

    --
    bork bork bork!
  20. Re:Easy solution... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Old Olsonic hasn't used anything from Microsoft since Windows 3.1. That's a very bitter slashbotter.

  21. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Believe it or not, some people run a computer for other than cosmetic reasons. It wouldn't be enough to make the desktop 'look' like Windows.

    So while you might enjoy running whatever Window Manager is in vogue at the coffeehouse, the rest of us are loading other stuff on our computers like word processors, spreadsheets, and browsers.

    If you're running X11 isn't the Tab Windows Manager good enough? It wasn't for me, so I've upgraded to FVWM2 but twm is a decent and usable Window Manager, too. It's installed as part of the base X11 install on NetBSD. Your results may vary if you run a clone like Linux.

  22. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

    Can't most X11 window managers in Linux distros be configured to look similar enough to Windows to feel like "home"?

    Yes. On a related matter you can buy a car that looks very similar to a Lamborghini for a fraction of the price. As for handling and performance I assume its just as good. I mean, it looks the same, so why shouldn't it be?

    --
    You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
  23. Re:Trialware - not free by neilo_1701D · · Score: 5, Informative

    Then your understanding is wrong. As per Gabe Aul, you own it.

    The "one year" thing is to push people into upgrading sooner rather than later. If you upgrade within the first year, Windows 10 is free for the life of the device (and that includes reinstalls; so long as you have a Microsoft account and your Windows user is connected to that account, you can reinstall on that device to your heart's content.

    If you delay in upgrading past that one year mark, you need to go buy a copy.

  24. Re:Trialware - not free by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't we call it "free trial" rather than "free"? As far as I understand it, we're going to have to pay up after the first year of "trial". This goes for everyone including us who got a full Windows installation.

    You understand incorrectly.

    Once you have a Windows 10 key, its yours.

    To make it more obvious, the price for the foist year will be $0.00, and if you "buy" it during this time for the low, low price of $0.00 then you get a key that doesn't expire.

    If you buy it after that year the price will be more than $0.00 (let's say $x, where x is not zero) and you will get a key that doesn't expire.

    What will almost certainly happen though is that the period where it is available for free will be extended indefinitely. It's clear they want to push adoption of the Windows ecosystem to make it more homogenous and the best way to do that rapidly is to make it look like the window for the free upgrade is limited. I suspect it will be free forevermore, but they want a rapid uptake of users rather than a slow trickle.

  25. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    With the ongoing convergence of Xbox and Windows 10, it is only going to get worse for Linux gamers. Better download Virtual Box. In fact, right now would be a great time to download Virtual Box, because you can install the Widows 10 preview and get it 'validated' when you install it as a VM on your Linux box. Then you're set, and you've not had to pay the Microsoft Tax.

  26. Office Upgrade by birukun · · Score: 1

    Oh but you get to pay for a new version of Office....... so not totally free.

    --
    Self Defense - A Human Right www.a-human-right.com
  27. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

    After my girlfriend broke up with me I had a Real Doll created that looks just like her. Lower maintenance cost, fewer viruses, better documentation, infinitely more user friendly, and she completely respects my privacy.

    --
    You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
  28. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Let me know when I can run SolidWorks, Altium, and Adobe Premiere in Linux because those are just a few applications I happen to dabble with.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  29. Re:Trialware - not free by superswede · · Score: 1

    Thank you for clarifying and correcting me on this one ... and I'm glad that I was wrong.

  30. Factional infighting by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

    Just like in an empire or communist party, the conflicting reports/retractions make it increasingly obvious that some infighting is going on in Redmond. Interesting is who gets purged.

  31. Re:Trialware - not free by superswede · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the detailed explanation. Sorry if I mislead anyone (it was my honest belief).

  32. Re:Ha-ha. No. by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

    Free Windows upgrade for testing sounds like barter system. If you want to provide feedback, you will sign on. If not, you won't. If you get paid to test, then don't participate.

    Are you going for insightful? Or interesting? Or maybe informative?

    Glad to know that you are not part of the ecosystem involved, based on your answer, so, and I say this with the utmost respect because I have no other basis to tear you a new aresehole, fuck off and die please for the betterment of humanity.

    Microsoft's Gabe Aul confirmed this method on Twitter yesterday as part of a new blog post detailing some new changes to the way the company tests Windows 10. "As long as you are running an Insider Preview build and connected with the MSA (Microsoft Account) you used to register, you will receive the Windows 10 final release build and remain activated," says Aul

  33. Re:Easy solution... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Old Olsonic hasn't used anything from Microsoft since Windows 3.1. That's a very bitter slashbotter.

    Truth be told, I stopped at Windows 8.1 when my wife refused to use her laptop any more.

    But after that (blessed) hiatus, I needed a copy of some form of Windows from 7 or up, when I bought a Software defined FlexRadio, and although there is an API for OSX, it doesn't have the full command set.

    So I bought a fresh copy of Windows 7 pro in order to use their fully fleshed out program, that also has remote operation, SmartSDR.

    Runs quite nicely with Bootcamp.

    But I have no intention of putting up with a Windows 8 dog's breakfast, and the Windows 10 previews seem to be either "Greatest thing ever! Not one single problem!". Or the people who point out specific problems and get screamed at by the "BEST OS EVER!" peeps. I recall they were out in full force during Vista and Windows 8 rollouts as well. Who ya gonna believe?

    So I'm a little reluctant to put up with a bad OS just to do what I'm already doing.

    Another point of reference is I only used 3.1 for a very short time. I was using almost all DOS until W95. Having used the Amiga and Early Mac systems, W 3.1 just made me giggle. But Bing - your story is pretty good, so you can roll with that. I won't snitch on ya.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  34. Re:Ha-ha. No. by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A small price to pay to get a free OS for my gaming PC that won't be used for anything else.

  35. Re:not interested...unless. by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

    So make an image of your Windows 7 setup before you upgrade.

  36. Re:Trialware - not free by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    No problem. There was a lot of mixed information about how the free Windows keys would work due to a lack of info from MS themselves when they announced it, whether it would be one year only, and whether you'd be able to do a clean install or just an upgrade only etc.

    Microsoft has clarified that it's a full Windows key that can be used for clean installs and that once you have it, it's the same as buying a copy of Windows today.

  37. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    After my girlfriend broke up with me I had a Real Doll created that looks just like her. Lower maintenance cost, fewer viruses, better documentation, infinitely more user friendly, and she completely respects my privacy.

    Umm, well that was entertaining. The've actually managed to cross the bottom of the uncanny valley.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  38. Re:not interested...unless. by PNutts · · Score: 3, Informative

    One real problem is once you "upgrade" to Windows 10 from say Windows 7 - there is no going back Having checked it out on their website, My Windows 7 copy is no longer registrable.

    The free program Advanced Tokens Manager allows you to back up your activation and reapply it at as many times as you want.

  39. Re:not interested...unless. by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Shame you can't make an image of MS' activation servers, too, because that's the problem.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  40. Re:not interested...unless. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    You must have the correct SLIC (Software Licensing Description Table) for OEM activations.

    Does this mean there's some sort of hardware ID magic that happens when you use an OEM copy, or is this saying you must have an OEM copy for the tool to work?

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  41. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

    I would imagine that if you don't immerse it in hot water for a while before use it'd be uncannily similar to fucking a corpse.

    --
    You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
  42. Re:not interested...unless. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Informative

    So make an image of your Windows 7 setup before you upgrade.

    From Microsoft:

    http://answers.microsoft.com/e...

    Specifically :If you upgrade from a OEM or retail version of Windows 7 or Windows 8/8.1 to the free Windows 10 upgrade this summer, the license is consumed into it. Because the free upgrade is derived from the base qualifying license, Windows 10 will carry that licensing too.

    Try it and tell me how it works for you?

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  43. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    I would imagine that if you don't immerse it in hot water for a while before use it'd be uncannily similar to fucking a corpse.

    But I suppose it will allow you to drive in the HOV lanes.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  44. Re:not interested...unless. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Oh, just shut the fuck up. You keep spouting all of this FUD when it's painfully obvious that you don't have a fucking clue what you are talking about.

    From Microsoft:

    If you upgrade from a OEM or retail version of Windows 7 or Windows 8/8.1 to the free Windows 10 upgrade this summer, the license is consumed into it. Because the free upgrade is derived from the base qualifying license, Windows 10 will carry that licensing too.

    The specific page:

    http://answers.microsoft.com/e...

    Now play nice.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  45. Re:not interested...unless. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    "there is no going back Having checked it out on their website, My Windows 7 copy is no longer registrable."
    Oh you absolutely can go back.

    Install an OEM version with DAZ windows loader 2.2.2, then edit the registry to use your KEY.

    You are back to a legal version that matches your COA.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  46. Re:not interested...unless. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    "there is no going back Having checked it out on their website, My Windows 7 copy is no longer registrable." Oh you absolutely can go back.

    Install an OEM version with DAZ windows loader 2.2.2, then edit the registry to use your KEY.

    You are back to a legal version that matches your COA.

    Good grief, if W10 is good, I'll install it. But if it's shit, I'll just stick with 7. Really shouldn't be any need to fuss around. All this activity has been about workaraounds and people not accepting what Microsoft says.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  47. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    I use not Linux, but PC-BSD, and while I'm happy w/ it, there are some things which I can't do, which is why I got the $100 Winbook on the side for those missing apps. Aside from being able to open and edit Office documents (I use Calligra rather than Libre Office), there are times I need to do things like GoToMeeting or other apps that just don't work outside Windows or Android/OS-X. Also, there are some web sites that recognize your environment and throw up their arms in despair if you try to run them.

    However, PC-BSD works great, since most of the sites I visit are viewable under either Chromium or FireFox, and the only major game I play is FreeCiv. On the Winbook, I did get Steam and Civ4. It would be nice if there were a Steam VM under PC-BSD where I could play Civ 4 as well.

  48. Re:Trialware - not free by Drethon · · Score: 1

    Then your understanding is wrong. As per Gabe Aul, you own it.

    The "one year" thing is to push people into upgrading sooner rather than later. If you upgrade within the first year, Windows 10 is free for the life of the device (and that includes reinstalls; so long as you have a Microsoft account and your Windows user is connected to that account, you can reinstall on that device to your heart's content.

    If you delay in upgrading past that one year mark, you need to go buy a copy.

    Hopefully they release SP1 within that first year.

  49. Re:not interested...unless. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Well truth be told to you and the grandparent here that Windows 7 is heading towards another WIndows XP. It is legacy now and in a short time will go EOL. Windows 7 won't be around forever.

    Windows 10 is the last OS by Microsoft. Future versions will be MacOSX like 10.1, 10.2, etc.

    I forced myself a few months ago to switch to Windows 8.1. Actually I found out I just did not like change mostly and didn't realize it. I put in a start menu replacement and modernMIX to make apps act like applications and found glass8. I have a surface now too which I am now getting comfortable without aero and the new flat look.

    Windows 8.1 & 10 are less heavy and boot fast if you disable bios/CSM and go straight into uEFI. UEFI is wonderful! It just works and is very fast.

    Cons:
    - Windows 10 is not stable and in my opinion very beta quality as No QA team is left at Microsoft and were laid off
    - They will be very frequent updates with only the pro version giving you the choise to skip every other update aka .1 release

    So if anyone reading this is using Windows 7 I would think about switching ... next summer after bloodstone and 10.1 get released and the nasty bugs get fixed. The applets are pretty cool if they are not full screen and it is nice to have a book reader for my MCSE books and pandora or Netflix going. Under Windows 7 I needed a browser and a million tabs to sort. A pain.

  50. Can I please have my XP interface back? by maz2331 · · Score: 1

    I just want to have the old XP interface back. Hell, I'd pay double retail for that option. I love the internals of 7 and 8, but so hate the interface.

    1. Re:Can I please have my XP interface back? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Which part? My 7 (and my 8) looks strikingly like XP. Some of the internals have moved, but they're not hard to find (esp with global search and shortcuts).

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  51. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Because it works!

    It comes with their computer. It was they use at work. Their documents do not look funny on other computers. It is stable (yes slashdotters it is not 1998 anymore as WIndows uses an NT kernel now), and most important RUNS ALL THEIR SOFTWARE. No WINE. No hacks, No clones of what they used on their work pcs.

    Why would someone want to change? Why put up with xorg.conf files, drivers breaking after a release update, finding drivers, etc. I left linux a few years ago as my main OS and unless things have radically changed the lack of an ABI meant after a release update or 2 the distro would BREAK. ATI drivers would stop working etc.

    So the answer is unless you run a server, do crazy development work in computer science or strange mathematical apis, then there is no reason to change. In 1998 Unix had the best development tools. In 2015 Vistual Studio 2015 has clang, java support, android SDK, typescript, and the same libraries.

  52. Re:not interested...unless. by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To say nothing of all the other crap they do, MS is still pushing DRM. Windows 10 is no change of direction on that point. If they want my business, they must rip out all the DRM. No more activation keys like they started in Windows 95, no more phoning home like they started in XP, and definitely no more policing of 3rd party media like they tried in Vista. No more Windows Genuine Advantage, OOXML and J++ and ActiveX and other deliberate attempts to sabotage standards, and file format and other lock ins. No more legal debacles like the stunt they tried with SCO.

    Let MS admit they were wrong to go along with the sophistry of Big Media concerning piracy, and start behaving like a tech leader again. They tell Big Media how to handle tech, not the other way around. What a weak move that was, following those greedy fools of Big Media, and showing the tech savvy that they don't deserve any respect, don't have any sense of technology, which is supposed to be their core competence. RMS criticizes Torvalds for being just an engineer. That goes double for MS, in their efforts to be just an engineering company and agreeing to implement DRM. But they went further than that, really seemed to believe they could make DRM work for themselves, and when they at last got into politics, pushed for stronger intellectual property laws, not better ones. They're not even a decent engineering shop, they're little more than an abusive monopolist desperately clinging to a broken business model.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  53. Nervous about upgrading by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    My concern is this: only the more expensive ("pro") versions will let you control your upgrades. Upgrades are pretty filthy- routinely booting you out of games, crashing stuff you need to have happen, messing up everything- and disabling that and only doing it when YOU want is a pretty big deal.

    More importantly, making this a "premium only" feature means that, once you have 10, your choices are
    1- Take exactly the upgrades they want on your machine, when they want it, forever,
    2- Some kind of hack
    3- Pay for the upper version to get basic admin rights on your machine back

    But that's what a "premium only" feature means- what does it imply?

    Combined with all the "get 10 for free" crap we see going around (on top of the fact that 10 will become a mandatory pack-in on most hardware and essentially all laptops), and we see a Microsoft that is absolutely desperate to get you away from a Windows box you have full control over, and onto one that THEY control... and that means they see forsee a great deal of profit for doing that.

    Exactly what else will get patched into 10? What's on their upgrade cycle? Everyone with a free copy of 10 gets to find out what the price they actually paid was later... just give them a little time.

    The latest 7 patch puts an advertisement for a product on your box- the 10 button. I'd hazard a guess that this won't be the only time you have advertisements spamming your GUI in the near future. Just look at the X-Box interface for a preview of "check this shit out bro".

    I could be wrong. I hope I am. But I'll wait a few months to see if it is good, and then I'll buy the premium version that keeps my admin control, and if I'm wrong I'm out a bit of cash, but if I'm right, I'll be able to use my PC without whatever the hell this mandatory software injection scheme they have is... maybe.

    Or I stay on 7. Which appears to have only gotten better with time, based on Microsoft's devout refusal to produce a version that isn't garbage.

    1. Re:Nervous about upgrading by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      If you pay full price for Win 10 you still get the full ownership experience. This option will always exist as they have to support enterprise users who require that kind of control over the machine. I have Win 8.1 pro running classic shell and I still have full control over my PC without having some crazy hotmail login, why would that change for Win 10?

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:Nervous about upgrading by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      http://www.howtogeek.com/21916...

      I mean, it's an announced negafeature already. You have to get one of the non-home versions to do this. What version do all these "free" upgrades give you? The one where you can't turn off their binaries, advertisements, and whatever the fuck else they think is good for you to have.

    3. Re:Nervous about upgrading by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      I mean really, it should be obvious by now- if Microsoft is willing to jump through hoops to prevent you from disabling auto-update, then it must be VERY much in your interest to disable auto-update. It must be super in your best interest if they are willing to try to shut it off. They wouldn't take away that if you weren't gonna need it real bad in the near future.

  54. Re:Easy solution... by gladius17 · · Score: 1

    Why the fuck would I call Microsoft about a free copy of Windows from Bittorrent? Or ever, for anything? Have fun with your life of slavery.

  55. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You've still got to deal with the slowness of X, which rapes the CPU even when doing something as simple as moving a window and still makes disabaling desktop composition necessary to maintain decent frame rates in modern games.

    Compiz has solved both problems for years. The default is now to unredirect all fullscreen windows, which makes most games work fine without any additional trickery.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  56. Re:Because Microsoft laid off their QA team last f by Uberbah · · Score: 1, Troll

    I'm actually surprised that you even went there...but hey, too fucking lazy to go Google it for yourself.

    Except that's fucking bullshit. It's the job of the person making the assertion to back it up with evidence, not the audience. Otherwise I'll casually assert that you like have sex with goats. Is it my job to prove that assertion, or your job to disprove it?

  57. Re:not interested...unless. by bhiestand · · Score: 1

    Not sure on this particular piece of software (though it looks handy!), but recommend you take a look at this Windows 7 OEM Activation article.

    There normally is hardware magic for the OEM copies, but I'm not really sure how this one deals with SLIC.

    --
    SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  58. Support Lifecycle for Windows 10 by Jagungal · · Score: 1

    The real questions that needs to be answered is what the support lifecycle for Windows 10 is. With Windows 7 we are right to 2020, with Windows 8.1 it is good until 2023 ... with Windows 10 .. well there is just a bunch of talk about software as a service and nothing at all about the length of support.

    1. Re:Support Lifecycle for Windows 10 by bazorg · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that once the product is released the policy will be published in the usual place... https://support.microsoft.com/...

      For now, it's a good idea to sign up and start a trial install on VirtualBox or on a real machine.

  59. Free Windows or Free Testers? by hsa · · Score: 1

    The opt-in testing is a big question mark..

    Home users get forced updates, like you can read here:
    http://www.howtogeek.com/219166/you-won%E2%80%99t-be-able-to-disable-or-delay-windows-updates-on-windows-10-home/

    Who tests these updates? Are the "happy" Insiders unwilling test subjects? Will you just get notifications, like:
    "Windows installed some potentially unstable updates on your computer. Please provide feedback and error logs before we release these to real users. Thank you for your co-operation."

  60. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    As an ex-hardcore gamer let me know when ALL my favorite games run natively under Linux; not emulated with a performance hit, or buggy implementation of Wine.

    I prefer OSX and Linux for development but the reality is that Windows is the where the majority of new games are (only) released on.

  61. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

    You are one of those stupid people.

    I know you are but what am I?

    --
    You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
  62. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

    Thankfully I don't have to reload Windows for people. That's pleb work.

    --
    You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
  63. Freebie! wooho! by bazorg · · Score: 1

    Excellent, I was going to pony up £80 for a new license for the new PC I'm building. Now I'll spend more on the hardware. I hope this works on Virtual Box so I don't mess up my current machine.

    1. Re:Freebie! wooho! by knight17 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure this will work in virtual machines? If they do this will be really great

    2. Re:Freebie! wooho! by bazorg · · Score: 1

      It installed correctly yesterday on VirtualBox. The new PC arrives later in the week, I'll install it there again and then hope that on the 29th July it will become a permanent licence.

  64. Re:not interested...unless. by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    No QA team is left at Microsoft and were laid off

    No QA team? Sure, some QA people were laid off, but I'm quite sure Microsoft still has a nicely sized QA department. :)

  65. It's like herpes by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I followed the instructions (forget where) to get rid of it, but it came back.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  66. free....wha? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    OK so wait, their first announcement that if you upgraded to Win10 now, you could have it for free.

    Now they say that if you are willing to test it, you can have it for free forever ...which would imply that the PREVIOUS announcement *wasn't* 'forever'.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:free....wha? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      How the hell did you reach that conclusion? No, no such thing was implied nor is implicated (by any rational mind).

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:free....wha? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe I'm not rational then: from http://www.microsoft.com/en-us...
      Boldface mine.

      "*Windows Offer Details

      Yes, free! This upgrade offer is for a full version of Windows 10, not a trial. 3GB download required; standard data rates apply. To take advantage of this free offer, you must upgrade to Windows 10 within one year of availability. Once you upgrade, you have Windows 10 for free on that device.

      Windows 10 Upgrade Offer is valid for qualified Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 devices, including devices you already own. Some hardware/software requirements apply and feature availability may vary by device and market. The availability of Windows 10 upgrade for Windows Phone 8.1 devices may vary by OEM, mobile operator or carrier. Devices must be connected to the internet and have Windows Update enabled. Windows 7 SP1 and Windows 8.1 Update required. Some editions are excluded: Windows 7 Enterprise, Windows 8/8.1 Enterprise, and Windows RT/RT 8.1. Active Software Assurance customers in volume licensing have the benefit to upgrade to Windows 10 enterprise offerings outside of this offer. To check for compatibility and other important installation information, visit your device manufacturerâ(TM)s website and the Windows 10 Specifications page. Additional requirements may apply over time for updates. Security and features are kept automatically up-to-date which is always enabled. See the Windows 10 How to Upgrade page for details."

      Precisely how else might a 'rational' mind interpret that?

      What I'm unsure of, and isn't clearly addressed above is whether Win10 eventually becomes one of those 'instead of buying it you pay monthly' things like Office365, and thus you might have a version of Win10 for free, but support ends in 12 months or something.

      --
      -Styopa
    3. Re:free....wha? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Just because they clarified does not mean it was not free, or going to be free - or meant to be free, before that. Such a strange conclusion to draw. Really.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:free....wha? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      First, your weird double-negative statement is nonsensical.
      (That they made a clarification) "...does not mean it was not free, or going to be free - or meant to be free..."
      Logically there's a finite list of possibilities here; either it was going to be a) free, or b) not free.
      Whether or not they clarified it now is irrelevant. It was going to be one of the two.

      Second, what it does mean (to a rational mind) is that their message to the marketplace was pretty damn confusing to more people than just me, to the point that MS felt they needed to try to clarify.

      In case you're wondering where I got this "crazy" idea, here's an example:
      http://www.theguardian.com/tec...
      From that article, in regard to the 'free Win10 offer': "...Once you have installed Windows 10 and made a note of your product key, itâ(TM)s yours forever. ..."

      I'm still trying to figure out how you could parse that it's NOT free, or that that is somehow obvious?

      --
      -Styopa
    5. Re:free....wha? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I see where, I think, you are making your mistake... No, it was not limited to free or not free to those people the offer applied to. The product could have been free (and was, by most accounts) prior to the clarification. It was going to be free the entire time. It was not mysteriously not free before hand, it just was not clear and officially stated. That does not mean it was not free before this, it just means that they had to clarify it because people, such as you, were not comprehending and there was no official announcement that made it clear.

      If I say that air is free that does not mean it was not free yesterday. It just means that I have made it clear today.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  67. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Where is AutoCAD for Linux
    Where is RAM/Elements for OSX
    Where is Photoshop for Linux
    Where is ProTools for Linux
    Where is Pro/Engineer for OSX

    I'm not looking for some "alternative" - I have 20 years of designs, arts, compositions in those native formats and it costs me $200/hr to convert, change and retrain.

    The cost of switching from Windows to another OS which HAS an equivalent program is going to be into 5 figures for every employee. The cost to switch to a different program (many of which take 2-3000 hours to become truly proficient) is going to be much higher.

    The OS may look the same, but it will operate differently (time to fire my IT guy and hire a different one, along with the tens of thousands of dollars such a move costs) and my industry specific programs will no longer run the way they did under the original OS. It's a fucking nightmare from a business perspective, no matter how much easier it will be for you to use a command line to load and troll slashdot.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  68. Setting the record straight via fact/truth... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Linux has done such a "fine job" there on the desktop & only reason it's used on servers + smartphones is that it is FREE, keeping per unit costs down - & THAT is the ONLY real reason!

    (It's certainly not 'superiority', since face facts: Device drivers of solid quality for peripherals happens for Windows for sure, & it is what truly separates Windows & sets it ABOVE Linux - it's nigh guaranteed since Windows "rules the roost" marketshare-wise on BOTH PC desktops + servers combined).

    Fact: Linux had to seek alternate markets-outlets (smartphones) since it failed on the largest market in computing prior to this in PC desktops especially!

    Truth: Windows OWNS that for decades @ what? Roughly 94.5++ % of marketshare?? Yes.

    You "Pro-*NIX Penguins" had to GIVE AWAY your OS in order for it to have ANY share of market... MS didn't.

    APK

    P.S.=> It's always NICE dispelling your illusions & "FUD" bs you "Open SORES" people spew around here, but then again?

    ANDROID (yes, a Linux) DOES THE JOB EVEN BETTER vs. the YEARS OF "FUD" BS SPEWED HERE ON /. ESPECIALLY OF "Windows != Secure, Linux = Secure" when it's purest LIES from you fools, & Linux was hiding behind "security by obscurity" (not being used as much, thus, hacker/cracker types wouldn't target it anymore than pickpockets target 1 person only - it's not worth their efforts, & LOW "ROI") being shown for a decade++ now to be untrue since ANDROID gets exploited weekly practically, lol... so much for your "marketing bs" boys - it doesn't stand up to reality! apk

  69. Re:Because Microsoft laid off their QA team last f by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "Except that's fucking bullshit. It's the job of the person making the assertion to back it up with evidence, not the audience."

    It is certainly not the job of every poster to anticipate how uninformed you are and then provide links to help you combat your own ignorance. If you couldn't get proof by simply googling it would then - at that point - it be reasonable to ask for some kind of citation. As it stands now you are just another sad and pathetic variation of the Citation Needed weenie.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  70. So, clarify this for me... by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 1

    - If I do a clean install of Windows 10 Preview onto a computer, that will turn into a full license of Windows 10 on July 29, no upgrade from a previous version of Windows is necessary? Or does this only apply if I've installed Windows 10 Preview onto an installation of Windows 7 or 8.1?

    (http://blogs.windows.com/bloggingwindows/2015/06/19/upcoming-changes-to-windows-10-insider-preview-builds/ is unclear on this, saying "As long as you are running an Insider Preview build and connected with the MSA you used to register, you will receive the Windows 10 final release builld" but then "It’s important to note that only people running Genuine Windows 7 or Windows 8.1 can upgrade to Windows 10 as part of the free upgrade offer.")

    - I only see Windows 10 Preview releases for x86 and x64. How do I get the Pro version instead of the Home version?

    I see this as a good way that I can get free up-to-date Windows licenses for old computers I have that are running XP and Vista; all I need is to wipe them and put Windows 10 Preview on them, and link them to my Microsoft account. I just want to make sure that this will work, and I'd like to have the Pro version.

    1. Re:So, clarify this for me... by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 1

      Also from TFA: "Update, June 21st 9:45AM: Microsoft has updated its blog post today and removed references to 'remain activated.' The stealthy edit isn't acknowledged, and we've reached out to the company for comment."

  71. Update: "remain activated" deleted in MS blog post by __roo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From TFA:

    Update, June 21st 9:45AM: Microsoft has updated its blog post today and removed references to "remain activated." The stealthy edit isn't acknowledged, and we've reached out to the company for comment.

    I bet /. comments helped encourage this.

  72. Re:not interested...unless. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    http://www.businessinsider.com...

    According to the above link the development team does both so no qa team. The real question is how they are evaluated? Right now there is no incentive and it shows. No,code freeze and ship first and ask questions later is how it appears

  73. Re:Ha-ha. No. by snowgirl · · Score: 1

    A small price to pay to get a free OS for my gaming PC that won't be used for anything else.

    Ah it doubles as a nice Chromebook!

    --
    WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
  74. Yawn. Another windows... by TheRealLifeboy · · Score: 1

    Free upgrade? My Ubuntu 4.04, 6.04, 8.04, 10.04 and 12.04 was free. Both types, libre and gratis. So was my 14.04.

  75. Re: not interested...unless. by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Win10 boot is plenty slow through either BIOS or UEFI. The trick it does with UEFI however is keeping the UEFI boot screen active while booting the entire OS. On a brand new 32-core Intel Xeon machine with NVM SSD and 64GB RAM it takes about 30-45s to get to the login screen after UEFI has handed over control. That's slow. In comparison, Fedora with SELinux and systemd takes ~5-10s

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  76. Re: Why do people want to run Windows? by guruevi · · Score: 1

    You're also spending 5-6, if not more digits on licenses on a yearly basis. In the long term it might be cheaper to convert.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  77. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by natex84 · · Score: 1

    I'd had Linux on it. I put the disc in, loaded it up. Everything worked, and worked well. Then I loaded Vista on it. It took me a few hours to find the network drivers (because the model wasn't listed on the manufacturer's website (Lenovo)), and then a few days to find the SM Bus drivers. I still haven't found the audio drivers for it. I did install the nVidia drivers on it, that took three reboots to get them going. The updates took me 9 hours to download (for some reason, under Vista, the download speed is almost a quarter of what it is under Linux) and install. This is what you'd have me leave Linux for? I thought Windows "just worked," and ran everything!

    Which version of Linux (release date / year)? If it is a more recent build than from 2007, comparing it to Windows Vista (which was released in January 2007) is hardly fair... I'm not surprised 8.5 YEARS of updates took a while to download.

  78. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    I'd had Linux on it. I put the disc in, loaded it up. Everything worked, and worked well.

    Then I loaded Vista on it. It took me a few hours to find the network drivers (because the model wasn't listed on the manufacturer's website (Lenovo)), and then a few days to find the SM Bus drivers. I still haven't found the audio drivers for it. I did install the nVidia drivers on it, that took three reboots to get them going. The updates took me 9 hours to download (for some reason, under Vista, the download speed is almost a quarter of what it is under Linux) and install.

    This is what you'd have me leave Linux for? I thought Windows "just worked," and ran everything!

    Which version of Linux (release date / year)? If it is a more recent build than from 2007, comparing it to Windows Vista (which was released in January 2007) is hardly fair... I'm not surprised 8.5 YEARS of updates took a while to download.

    I am not a WIndows fanboy but 8.1 install will find hardware automatically. Windows 7 can for most too including 3rd party bluetooth. I didn't even have to do an update. It just started installing itself within minutes of a fresh setup.

    Funny how the parent thinks I am trying to enforce my opinion on others when the grandparent talked about how to trick users into thinking xorg is Win7 or how to evangalize Windows users.

  79. Re:Update: "remain activated" deleted in MS blog p by Junta · · Score: 1

    Ever more severe correction:
    "Once you have successfully installed this build, you will also be able to clean install on that PC from final media if you want to start over fresh. It’s important to note that only people running Genuine Windows 7 or Windows 8.1 can upgrade to Windows 10 as part of the free upgrade offer.*"

    Basically, Windows 10 is not *intended* to be free for anyone who wasn't going to get it for free already. MS may not be able to reasonably stop free editions of 10 stemming from free installs of 10 preview, but it certainly seems to reserve the right to try and say that it is invalid per their license terms.

    I strongly suspect the initial description will stand. Windows 10 preview activations weren't linked to anything at all, and all signs point to MS not having the ability to discern the history of an activation to see if there is any weirdness that may invalidate. So they are likely in the situation of either letting 'insiders' get 10 for free that were not running genuine 7, 8, 8.1 or screwing over 'insiders' that installed Windows 10 and no longer have the ability to easily prove their Windows 7/8/8.1 genuine status.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  80. Re:not interested...unless. by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

    That isn't actually from Microsoft. That's a volunteer (aka random guy) who, I believe, is quoting a mixture of the Microsoft FAQ and ToS.

    The legality of Microsoft licenses doesn't always follow how they actually work on computers.

  81. Re:Trialware - not free by labnet · · Score: 1

    So what about domain connected computers that don't use a Microsoft account as typically found in most businesses; can they be upgraded?

    --
    46137
  82. Re:not interested...unless. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    That isn't actually from Microsoft. That's a volunteer (aka random guy) who, I believe, is quoting a mixture of the Microsoft FAQ and ToS.

    The legality of Microsoft licenses doesn't always follow how they actually work on computers.

    This is sort of the problem. As a Community moderator and Wiki Author, if he isn't telling the truth, Microsoft should correct him. And after using their products for a long time, I don't make up my mind on what is what, until after their products are out a long enough time.

    Example: Windows 8 consumer preview.

    If you installed it on a Windows 7 machine, you could go back to your W7 install..

    If you installed it on a Vista Machine - there was no going back.Your Vista OS was hosed.

    That nugget was to be found on only one little webpage, which wasn't the one you downloaded it from.

    And given that it was called "Consumer Preview" a lot of consumer level people installed it on Vista machines without running it in a VM. Which not a whole lot of consumer level folks even know what a VM is.

    Basically, if what all the people here who know everything about Microsoft products are right, I'll be swimming in daisies, able to switch back and forth forever.

    Uintil I see exactly where someone does that, I'll assume that at the very least, given the completely opposing information coming out between people here, and a Microsoft site, perhaps caution would be indicated.

    Unless of course, someone who was absolutely certain would promise to buy me a copy of Win 7 Pro. After all, how could they lose?

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  83. Re:Trialware - not free by neilo_1701D · · Score: 1

    Windows 7/8 Enterprise is NOT able to upgrade (for free) to Windows 10.

    Look at the fine-print here:

    It is our intent that most of these devices will qualify, but some hardware/software requirements apply and feature availability may vary by device. Devices must be connected to the internet and have Windows Update enabled. ISP fees may apply. Windows 7 SP1 and Windows 8.1 Update required. Some editions are excluded: Windows 7 Enterprise, Windows 8/8.1 Enterprise, and Windows RT/RT 8.1. Active Software Assurance customers in volume licensing have the benefit to upgrade to Windows 10 enterprise offerings outside of this offer. We will be sharing more information and additional offer and support terms in coming months.

  84. Re:Why do people want to run Windows? by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Alternative theory: One could just not have moved their OS to a newer version and have just taken over their own security. Then the applications they would have purchased would still work. Crappy software vendors is not a very good reason to blame an operating system. If your mechanic puts on crappy wiper blades do you think your car is junk?

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  85. Re:not interested...unless. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    The free program Advanced Tokens Manager allows you to back up your activation and reapply it at as many times as you want.

    So what you are saying is tht Microsoft will allow two separate versions of Windows to run from the exact same activation code?

    And are you guaranteeing that? Seems like something a little confusing for them to do that, Two identical numbers referring to Windows 7 and Windows 10 concurrently. So I will be able to run both. I will be able to dual boot in either 7 or 10. Because Windows will allow me to do that.

    What a wonderful generous group of folks to give me two OS's for the price of one.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  86. Re:not interested...unless. by armanox · · Score: 1

    First off - thanks for the glass8 thought. I'm going to try that on my Windows 8 machines.

    Second thought - Currently my policy at home (and home based users) is upgrade 8.x to 10, and leave 7 in place for now.

    --
    I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  87. Re:Because Microsoft laid off their QA team last f by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    It is certainly not the job of every poster to anticipate how uninformed you are and then provide links to help you combat your own ignorance.

    It's not my job to go along with your strawman, as the only one blathering on about "anticipation" is you. Now where are all those citations proving that you do not in fact have sex with goats? Or are you always this "lazy"?

  88. Re:Because Microsoft laid off their QA team last f by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    windows layoffs are common knowledge

    Not for their Q/A team at the same time they've been prepping for a major release, it's not. It was rather more specific than a vague "Microsoft has had layoffs".

  89. Re:Because Microsoft laid off their QA team last f by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    I have no doubt that you can't figure out the difference between trying to find a citation that something is true, versus trying to find a citation that proves a negative. Congratulations, in one single statement you graduated to the top of the moron list here on Slashdot. Kudos, as that is no easy feat.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  90. What about the users who Windows tests? by Art3x · · Score: 1

    What about all the users who Windows tests?

  91. That's the point by allo · · Score: 1

    they want you to use a mircrosoft account instead of a local account. you pay with your data.

  92. Re:Because Microsoft laid off their QA team last f by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    I have no doubt that you can't figure out the difference between trying to find a citation that something is true, versus trying to find a citation that proves a negative.

    No one is going to know what is true until it is proven, fuckwit. And it is your job, as the person making the assertion, to back it up. Skepticism isn't lazy, expecting other people to prove your points for you, is.