Slashdot Mirror


Greek Financial Crisis Is an Opportunity For Bitcoin

An anonymous reader writes: Greece's economy has been in trouble for several years, now, and a major vote next weekend will shake it up even further. The country can't pay its debts, and the upcoming referendum will decide whether they face increased austerity measures or start the process of exiting the Euro. One side effect of the crisis is that alternative currencies like Bitcoin suddenly look much more attractive as the "normal" currencies become unstable. "Tony Gallippi, the co-founder of bitcoin payment processor Bitpay, tweeted on Sunday night that he expected the price of bitcoin to rise to between $610 and $1,250 if Greece exits the Euro. The currency is currently worth $250. Part of the reason why the crisis is so tempting for proponents of the cryptocurrency is the echoes of a previous crisis in the Eurozone: the banking collapse in Cyprus in 2013, which saw that nation also impose capital controls to prevent massive outflows of currency from the panicking country. That collapse came at the same time as the first major boom in the price of bitcoin, which began the year at less than $20 and peaked at ten times that by early April – before it all came crashing down."

359 comments

  1. Because the Greeks are so stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yes, throw your money into the Bitcoin pyramid scam! Surely that will fix everything!

    1. Re:Because the Greeks are so stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      As opposed to every other currency, because they're backed by threats instead of backed by willing acceptance.

    2. Re: Because the Greeks are so stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other currencies aren't a pyramid scheme.

      Actually, bitcoin isn't a pyramid scheme.

      There are no currencies that are pyramid schemes.

      Bitcoin is the world's first fringe currency.

    3. Re: Because the Greeks are so stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      fiat currencies are a ponzi scheme.

    4. Re: Because the Greeks are so stupid? by Holi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      >Bitcoin is the world's first fringe currency.

      pretty sure it's not.
      There have been many fringe currencies. From company chits to Disney Dollars, there have been many fringe currencies throughout history, It's just that the term had yet to be coined.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    5. Re:Because the Greeks are so stupid? by Spazmania · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right. The article makes no sense. The Euro isn't collapsing, Greece and its banks are. If you have the Euros with which to buy bitcoins, you're better off keeping the Euros. Just don't deposit them in a Greek bank.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    6. Re:Because the Greeks are so stupid? by mlts · · Score: 1

      The pyramid boom and bust are over. Maybe Bitcoin is valued at what it should be as of now, since various interests have actual value in the currency.

      However, I still consider BitCoin a currency for trading, although I'd exchange as quickly as I can. As a currency for storing value, that will take years. The US Dollar took 50 years and was running alongside the Mexican peso before it became a value standard.

    7. Re: Because the Greeks are so stupid? by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is not a currency, it is a virtualized commodity.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    8. Re: Because the Greeks are so stupid? by sysrammer · · Score: 2

      ...It's just that the term had yet to be coined.

      Well played.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    9. Re: Because the Greeks are so stupid? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Check out post-WWI German and Austrian Notgeld for one of the first 'fringe currencies' in general circulation.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    10. Re: Because the Greeks are so stupid? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Fiat currencies are not an outright ponzi scheme, but they're essentially exactly the same as Bitcoins: They are accepted because people think they will still have value in some foreseeable future.

      That's basically pretty much the general idea behind money. Be it Euros, Dollars, Bitcoins, gold or some shiny pebbles. And all of them have in common that they cannot be multiplied by the average person at leisure.

      The huge advantage our current fiat money has over the others is that governments can multiply it at leisure. But that's at best an advantage for governments, not for us. Because we have to have faith in that government giving a shit about us trusting it.

      And I don't really think that's currently really something I'd put my money on, so to speak.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:Because the Greeks are so stupid? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Few currencies are backed by force. Most currencies are backed by common trust in them, when the trust wanes then their value becomes unstable. A few countries try to tie their currencies to either assets or mandate particular prices, but these often create black markets as a side effect, and it's easy to recognize these currencies because their countries have very restricted freedoms.

    12. Re:Because the Greeks are so stupid? by G-forze · · Score: 1

      But if you have euros, and need to transfer them out of Greece, you cannot do that with the capital controls in place. At least not faster than mailing the bills in an envelope. If you can convert the euros to bitcoins, you can then send the coins anywhere pretty much instantly. And that is the greatest value of cryptocurrencies, even compared to normal bank services (between different banks and countries).

      --
      "There's someone in my head but it's not me." - Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon
    13. Re:Because the Greeks are so stupid? by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      And you're going to convert those paper Euros to bitcoins how exactly? Other than, you know, mailing the bills in an envelope.

      If you had your Euros in a bank outside of Greece, you could write a check, transfer money through paypal or engage in most any other transactions with them, capital controls be damned. Without having to convert the Euros to bitcoin.

      Basically, all these things you can magically do by converting your Euros to bitcoin, you can do without bitcoin.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    14. Re:Because the Greeks are so stupid? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      Few currencies are backed by force.

      Now you've got me curious - which currencies are *not* backed by force?

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    15. Re:Because the Greeks are so stupid? by bungo · · Score: 1

      Now you've got me curious - which currencies are *not* backed by force?

      Imperial credits of course.

      In the old republic, the republic credits were backed by the force.

      --
      "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
    16. Re:Because the Greeks are so stupid? by amias · · Score: 1

      wasn't it forcing the world to sell oil only in dollars that did that ?

      have a search to see a list of countries that tried to sell oil using other currencies and you will see a very close match to the list of US Invasions

      --
      [site]
    17. Re:Because the Greeks are so stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USD wasn't even an accepted currency in the US for a long while.

      As for it being dominant right now, it was because the US was pretty much the last First World power with meaningful infrastructure and manufacturing left standing after WWII. As for its dominance in the future... I would question that.

      Realistically, sooner or later AIIB will be courted by US bankers... on China's terms... with the yuan as the currency of choice.

      Other than the USD and the yaun, the only other currency that can muster enough steam is the Euro, because the Greek fiasco only strengthens the currency, and the Euro isn't going anywhere anytime soon. It always has pulled ahead of the dollar since its inception.

    18. Re:Because the Greeks are so stupid? by tendrousbeastie · · Score: 1

      The only people holding Euros in Greek banks at this stage are those people holding their salary in their current account to pay their bills and rent. Anyone who had savings or investments in Greece moved it in 2011.

    19. Re:Because the Greeks are so stupid? by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      Since when is cybercrime willing acceptance? Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies bankroll mainly criminal activities, the legal and friendly usage is there, but negligible. I find it quite normal that people rather bank on a currency that is backed by something tangible rather than just hype and fluff.

    20. Re:Because the Greeks are so stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi 2011! I missed you. Here in 2015 we have Dell, Overstock, and Microsoft accepting bitcoin. I'd love to see your data as to which cybercrimes make up the majority of bitcoin-related activities.

      Then again, "cybercrime" is about as specific as "intellectual property" and achieves the same rhetorical goal.

  2. Go away, Tony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Tony Gallippi, the co-founder of bitcoin payment processor Bitpay, tweeted on Sunday night that he expected the price of bitcoin to rise to between $610 and $1,250 if Greece exits the Euro. "

    In hopes of getting everyone to quickly buy Bitcoins so it actually rises and he can sell. Nice try.

    1. Re:Go away, Tony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The funniest thing is that with the capital controls in place, you just can't send money abroad, so no bitcoin buying frenzy, sorry.

    2. Re:Go away, Tony by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      If true, that's a bad thing in a way. It means the bitcoin is NOT independent of politics and emotions, and that it's highly volatile rather than having stability that its advocate claim.

  3. You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >> alternative currencies like Bitcoin suddenly look much more attractive

    The problem most Greeks suddenly face is that their money is now locked up as electronic balances in banks that have shut down for a week and won't let them have more than 60 euros at a time. After crises like this (even America's own "great recession"), people tend to prefer forms of money are more than just bits or fiat paper, such as gold and silver.

    1. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because the value of gold and silver is somehow less arbitrary than electronic bank balances.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by fatgraham · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think his point was that you'd have physical access to it, yknow, to buy physical bread and milk.

    3. Re: You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold and silver are reliable and they aren't prone to massive inflation.

    4. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Junta · · Score: 1

      That is true, but gold/silver is more concrete. There is a psychological factor in concrete things.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    5. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because the value of gold and silver is somehow less arbitrary than electronic bank balances.

      Depends on who's running the bank, doesn't it? The value of gold and silver fluctuate with supply and demand worldwide. They have industrial and decorative uses and a widespread base of people willing to own them. In the absence of large-scale deep-space asteroid mining technology flooding the market with excess supplies, they're going to remain fairly valuable.

      A well-run bank can do much better (the value of its currency remaining approximately constant over time) but once you start instituting capital controls and swapping out the nice currency for shitty drachmas then it's another matter.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    6. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes? The government can't just make more gold appear, it's useful for something regardless of trade, it can be traded anywhere, and it can be held anonymously and hidden.

    7. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is only if it buys bread and milk. The trouble Greece and most of the modern world has is that its entirely dependent on international trade. Greece can't meet its needs by itself. I am not an expert on the Greek economy. Lets charitably assume they can feed themselves. What about all the drugs that are not manufactured there that many depend upon to live for example? Can a private individual order drugs from across the boarder with gold coins? Can a pharmacy or hospital buying in quantity for that matter?

      Sure there are exchanges for gold abroad, ultimately the answer is yes; for some quantity of gold you can obtain enough Euro to buy what you need. Now if the banks are closed where you are that might mean sending someone abroad to physically execute these transactions where trading desks and banks are open.

      If the economy becomes truly unhinged, people stop working, stores close, etc than gold really is not all that great. If I am hungry and you are hungry, and neither of us imagines that changing anytime soon do you think I'll trade my pound of cheese for your gold?

      I am supportive of a gold standard in general because I think inflation and debt based currency is an insidious trap used to enslave all of us. A gold standard would prevent the vipers from manipulating things and causing recessions that last half of peoples productive lives, it would reduce inequality, it would reduce war, in exchange for more frequent smaller booms and busts. In short it would shrink many of the worlds problems. If you already have problems like Greece does it won't provide some magic fix, don't have any illusions about that.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    8. Re: You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Junta · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's incorrect. Gold fluctuates pretty wildly with mass hysteria, compete with massive deflation and inflation. Much like bitcoin. Prior to the 20th century, when communication wasn't quite so instant and pervasive, gold did a pretty good job because it was rare for *everyone* to panic more or be more confident all at once.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    9. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electronic fractional deposits and bitcoins are entirely different. No-one can stop you accessing your Bitcoins. There are no fractional bitcoin deposits, nor need there be. There are no Bitcoin bank runs. Bitcoin is basically gold (sans commodity/non-monetary utility) in electronic form.

    10. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by mjtaylor24601 · · Score: 2

      I think his point was that you'd have physical access to it, yknow, to buy physical bread and milk.

      Only if you kept it in a big pile in your basement, which would have its own set of security and logistical problems.

      If on the other hand you keep you gold/silver in the vault of a bank that is now shut down for the week then you're right back to where you are now.

      --
      I wish I were as sure of anything as some people are of everything
    11. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err yes... you see:
      unlike electronic balances,
      you can't conjure extra gold and silver out of thin air

    12. Re: You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold and silver cannot be printed out of thin air

    13. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by michelcolman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, you can. It's called derivatives. Sell silver you don't have, buy gold that nobody has, eat your heart out. They can send the price pretty much anywhere they like.

    14. Re: You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 2

      Besides, gold has never been a good money substitute except for the very rich, and they probably already have their wealth stashed away some place abroad. Gold's value comes from having lots of it. If you want to buy a house having a few pounds could help you. But if you have just a few ounces of gold, how would you spend it? Shave it to buy a loaf of bread?

    15. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Shaitan · · Score: 0

      The greeks have looked toward bitcoin in the past. It seems reasonable they will do so again. Being concerned about an economic collapse is not the same as being concerned an apocalypse crash of technology will happen.

    16. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can. It's called derivatives. Sell silver you don't have, buy gold that nobody has, eat your heart out. They can send the price pretty much anywhere they like.

      Poppycock. Even the legendary Jay Gould found that he couldn't corner the gold market.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    17. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by clovis · · Score: 2

      I think his point was that you'd have physical access to it, yknow, to buy physical bread and milk.

      What people found out in the Argentinian crisis of 1998 and in the breakup of Yugoslavia in the 1990's, is that you cannot buy anything you want with gold.
      People want things that they can use (or must have), so the economy becomes barter - trade alcohol for cans of food, trade cigarette lighters for condoms, gasoline for alcohol.

      I kind of doubt there will be a market for trading a can of soup for bitcoins on a street corner. I can imagine that someone might setup a trading warehouse that dealt with bitcoins, but I can't see that becoming standard practice. Keep in mind bitcoin trading requires computers and electricity.

      What is gold good for? Gold is good for preserving your savings through bank failures and/or a currency crisis if you convert your savings before the crisis happens.
      But you can do the same thing with Swiss francs or American Dollars, but like gold, only if you can get them before hand.
      Banks love gold for themselves for that reason - to protect their own money.

    18. Re: You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2

      But if you have just a few ounces of gold, how would you spend it? Shave it to buy a loaf of bread?

      You take it to a dealer and they "make change" buy turning it back into normal-person money. There are well-known gold coins out there of regulated weight and purity. For instance, the US mint has issued 1oz gold eagle and buffalo coins. They're in the neighborhood of ~$1300 and $1100 each right now, respectively. You can look up the price up on the Internet ahead of time and not get scammed by the dealer like you would with jewelry.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    19. Re: You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Gold fluctuates pretty wildly with mass hysteria, compete with massive deflation and inflation. Much like bitcoin. Prior to the 20th century, when communication wasn't quite so instant and pervasive, gold did a pretty good job because it was rare for *everyone* to panic more or be more confident all at once.

      Eh. Don't oversell the old gold standard. For starters, a gold standard was typically a steady and persistent malaise of deflation, as economic output increased more steadily than the money supply. Second, this was punctuated by Fun Fun Fun bouts of inflation when something like a gold rush happened or someone colonizing the new world discovered new mines overseas. Third, the metallic standards' troubles were amplified when regimes inevitably tried to do something stupid like have currency in both gold and silver with the price ratio fixed, invariably leading to a straightforward application of Gresham's law where the overvalued money drove out the good (sometimes merely hoarding the good money, other times trading it out of the country for a better deal).

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    20. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly, because with gold and silver the problem would be that their gold and silver would be locked up in exchanges that have shut down for a week and won't let more let them have more than half an troy oz of gold or more than five troy oz of silver at a time.

      The real problem is not the item being exchanged, its that the holders of the item is inundated with too many people trying to pull money (of any form) out of the institution. The institution is leveraged, and they plan for withdraws, but their models and estimates are way off. If they gave the people what they wanted, they wouldn't even have enough capital to survive the week. That would leave the early birds with their devalued cash and the late comers with nothing.

      This fact of life then rallies the people who state the bank shouldn't have leveraged itself to this degree. However, there is no degree so small that such a scenario could not occur. Therefore, if we expand banks beyond "stuffing money under mattresses" then they'll loan out the money stored in vaults and collect interest on that money. As long as the vaults don't contain more money than the depositors gave to the bank, there is always a potential to have a run on the bank. And, if the banks did keep that kind of money on hand, then the only profit model with a chance of success would be for the depositors to pay a storage fee, which nullifies most of the reasons to have a bank as opposed to an armored storage unit.

    21. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Canth7 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, Greeks that have already moved their funds out of banks don't need Bitcoin and the ones that didn't don't have funds to purchase Bitcoin. With that said, capital controls are a concern for other countries besides Greece and at some point these warnings (Argentina, Cyprus and now Greece) indicate that it makes sense to keep a portion of funds in products that can't be easily confiscated, controlled or taxed. Bitcoin isn't going to solve Greece's citizenry's problems, but it sure could alleviate future meltdowns. Think that the Bitcoin volatility is bad? Try living for a week without access to a bank and maybe only $60 withdrawals per day. When countries horribly mismanage their finances, all of a sudden Bitcoin becomes far more attractive. Just ask any Zimbabwean who is getting $5 worth of value out of an account with anything less than 175 quadrillion Zimbabwe Dollars. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/...

    22. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All major central banks (i.e. governments) hold gold. Tons and tons -- and tons -- of gold. If the value of gold was arbitrary or meaningless, then why are central banks so interested in the stuff? Why do they continue to hang on to it, or even add more to their piles, when it could be sold and the money used in more productive ways?

      What in the world could these governments, central bankers, and ivy league economists be thinking? That is my question to you, my friend.

    23. Re: You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Canth7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Besides, gold has never been a good money substitute except for the very rich, and they probably already have their wealth stashed away some place abroad. Gold's value comes from having lots of it. If you want to buy a house having a few pounds could help you. But if you have just a few ounces of gold, how would you spend it? Shave it to buy a loaf of bread?

      Exactly why the idea of a digital gold would be useful - no concerns about divisibility or spending it in places where you can't be physically present.

    24. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by swb · · Score: 1

      Tell me about the time in the last 2500 years when gold wasn't valuable.

      It has a value which has fluctuated over time, but it never seems to become valueless, either because of its history as a means of exchange, its intrinsic value as a material, or both.

    25. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The problem most Greeks suddenly face is that their money is now locked up as electronic balances in banks that have shut down for a week and won't let them have more than 60 euros at a time.

      That sounds reasonable compared to what happened when the US was on the gold standard......the government confiscated the gold. No 60 coins for you, it all went to the government.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    26. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't get cash out, but the values of other transactions are not limited (so if you have a card you could spend €400 a day on groceries or computers if you wanted); presumably you could also spend as much as you wanted on bitcoin. But then again maybe not, I don't know the precise terms that have been imposed.

    27. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's simple. The world needs some form of commodity money (as opposed to fiat money) to fall back on during times of extreme financial stress. It has to be something which can't be freely "printed" or duplicated with the click of a mouse like fiat currency. It's value needs to be derived from market forces, i.e. supply and demand, not government policy. It needs to be durable, fungible, divisible, rare, universal, and proven. It needs a high density of value, i.e. able to store significant value in a compact form.

      Only one material in the world meets these requirements. That material is gold, and it couldn't have been any other way. None of the other precious metals meets all of these requirements. Other commodities are inappropriate for obvious reasons.

      For those who don't believe this, look no further than the world's major central (government) banks who each hold tons of gold. They're not doing it to look cool. In fact, they generally prefer not to make a big deal out of it. Gold's intrinsic value isn't the glitter aspect or the few industrial uses it has; it's the fact that gold is money and has been for thousands of years.

      As a side note, gold probably wouldn't be a suitable means of trade during armageddon scenarios as many people (mainly detractors) claim. For that purpose, you'd be much better off with junk silver (google it). Gold, especially physical gold, provides protection against financial catastrophe, not physical catastrophe such as war or natural disaster.

    28. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      What is the name of a store that sells milk and bread and accepts payment in gold?

    29. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a misconception. Gold wouldn't be useful for trade in armageddon scenarios, like war or natural disaster -- that's where junk silver makes sense (google it). So you are correct in implying that gold coins wouldn't be ideal for common trade, but this is kind of obvious, in the way that 1000 bills aren't ideal for common trade.

      Gold is more likely to be useful in financial catastrophies (where there is still rule of law) than physical catastrophies (where rule of law goes out the window). After all, one needs to be able to exchange their gold in a safe, secure manner in order to benefit from it.

    30. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think his point was that you'd have physical access to it, yknow, to buy physical bread and milk.

      Yes, my local supermarket accepts gold coins and bullion, and has a scale ready to measure the mass of the coin I give them and calculate the value of it given current spot prices of a troy ounce.

    31. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Misunderstood post; put all my money in concrete

    32. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the government and banks can't arbitrarily fuck with it and turn off the tap. With electronic bank balances they can just unilaterally declare everyone broke and you all starve. They can just zero out balances. That doesn't mean they will because "law and stuff" but it's possible and I'm sure more than one person has raised this in a boardroom somewhere (until someone else shouted them down as an immoral prick).

      Value is determined by usefulness. A goat or a cow has value regardless of the government. A brick has value regardless of the government. Fiat currency is that same thing one-level-removed and backed by the force and promise of a government. When the government breaks that promise their fiat currency is worthless. Don't put all your eggs in one basket and make sure you have a few BitCoins handy, as well as some gold, as well as some chickens and a goat.

      Also, I know open source is cool and everything but BitCoin isn't the answer to any problem with money involved. BitCoin doesn't provide a military. BitCoin might (but probably won't) provide healthcare. BitCoin will not provide highways and freeways. We're all too willing to say "Fuck Taxes!" without paying a passing thought to what those taxes pay for (the non-military parts of it at least).

    33. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'd sell you a pound of bread for a pound of gold. I'm pretty sure nearly any shop would do so, too.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    34. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greek people living near the border can still cross the border and use the Euro even if the country leaves the economic union.
      That means that people living close to the border will keep accepting Euro as a currency if the Greek government makes a worthless currency.

    35. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      The problem most Greeks suddenly face is that their money is now locked up as electronic balances in banks that have shut down for a week and won't let them have more than 60 euros at a time. After crises like this (even America's own "great recession"), people tend to prefer forms of money are more than just bits or fiat paper, such as gold and silver.

      Greeks aren't stupid.

      They're withdrawing their money now while it is in Euros. Not gold or silver, but Euros. Because if/when Greece exists the Eurozone, they may return to drachmas. And those Greek bank accounts that were holding Euros? They'd be converted automatically at some set rate. So one day the machine will spit out Euros, the next day, it's drachmas.

      And Greeks know that if they switch back, drachmas will be basically worthless because no one will accept them.

      It's not the Euro crashing in price (the market has pretty much priced that out already), it's whatever currency Greece uses next. It can be tree leaves for all anyone cares.

      So Greeks are causing a huge run on the banks because at least their money is safer in Euros than it is in drachmas, tree leaves, Zimbabwe dollars, etc.

      It's not electronic currency that's the problem, either - part of those whole 60 Euro a day thing also means Greeks can't transfer their Euros outside of Greece.

      The Greek public isn't stupid. They know their country is in trouble, and they also know their life savings will evaporate in a pinch once they leave the Euro. That's why they're withdrawing Euros as fast as possible because the Euro will have value. The government will force-convert all existing electronic balances at some rate.

      To put it another way - let's say you have USD$2000 in the bank (not in the US, but your country happens to use US dollars). The economic conditions are such that the government will probably go to a new currency because the US dollar is too expensive for them to maintain. So what do you do? Do you wait it out so your government will turn your bank account from US dollars to worthless scrip? Or do you try to withdraw all your US dollars because that will likely have more value than whatever scrip comes out?

      In most failed countries, the default currency will be either the Euro or the US dollar, because the local currency is worthless. Zimbabwe is an extreme example of it.

    36. Re: You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Junta · · Score: 1

      Though you still have the issue of the fluctuation due to whimsical behavior of the populace.

      Basically you have one of two issues:
      -A system where a designated few are given power to manipulate the whole currency, complete with how bad that can go when such power is wielded in a corrupt or incompetent way. On the upside, they can apply some manipulation to mask a transient issue that can and has sent economies spiraling into collapse if it manifested in the value of the currency directly.
      -A system where the currency is more fixed, 'value' subject to the whims of the general participants in the economy. Note that those whims can be and have been quite successfully manipulated by sufficiently confident/charasmatic folks (e.g. relatively few very vocal folks largely drove Gold value up not so long ago), so the potential for manipulation by a few is still very real, even if not institutionalized.

      It seems in practice the latter is more destructive, though the former *feels* more wrong. There are of course spectacular examples of the first going wrong, but most of those systems are working. There aren't really any at scale examples of the latter going right in this day and age.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    37. Re: You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      That's incorrect. Gold fluctuates pretty wildly with mass hysteria, compete with massive deflation and inflation. Much like bitcoin. Prior to the 20th century, when communication wasn't quite so instant and pervasive, gold did a pretty good job because it was rare for *everyone* to panic more or be more confident all at once.

      Actually it was even more unstable in the 19th century. The myth about gold being solid is VERY mythical and only came about long after anyone remembers who it was like with a gold standard.

    38. Re: You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      That's incorrect. Gold fluctuates pretty wildly with mass hysteria, compete with massive deflation and inflation. Much like bitcoin. Prior to the 20th century, when communication wasn't quite so instant and pervasive, gold did a pretty good job because it was rare for *everyone* to panic more or be more confident all at once.

      Which is why Bitcoin is more of a speculative hedge, like gold, than a currency. For Greece situation, the hedge makes sense because you are worried about local impact, rather than a world wide event. However, I question demand going up to the levels in the article. At some point, individuals will look for alternatives such as gold if the price gets too high; and those who bought cheap ought to dump theirs and take the profits before the inevitable drop; especially since moving BitCoins out of Greece is easier than moving Euros. They can get Euros or Dollars, since the bigger danger for them is not a collapse of the Euro but the Greek government deciding to convert Euros in Banks back to Drachmas and exit the Euro zone. Having Euros or Dollars outside of Greece is what they want, not a speculative hedge and if Bitcoin let them do that they'll buy it; but sell it as well lessing the chance of a big runup.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    39. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Because the value of gold and silver is somehow less arbitrary than electronic bank balances.

      Depends on who's running the bank, doesn't it? The value of gold and silver fluctuate with supply and demand worldwide. They have industrial and decorative uses and a widespread base of people willing to own them. In the absence of large-scale deep-space asteroid mining technology flooding the market with excess supplies, they're going to remain fairly valuable.

      Or a cheap way to extract gold from seawater; remember aluminum was once considered a precious metal on par with gold. It's not really scarcity of the resource but the scarcity of the available supply.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    40. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an argentine, having lived through very much the same situation the greeks are in now, I can say you don't want silver or gold... you want cash money (dollars, euros) you can stash under your mattress. What these kind of situations create is distrust for banks and having your money in an account you're suddenly unable to have full access to.

    41. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ammunition. Lots of it. It's got a loooong store life and it's very useful in an emergency, provided you have the guns as well.

    42. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, the problem that everyone faces in situations like this is that if you're not a One Percenter, you're screwed. Have Bitcoin? Illegal, confiscated. Have gold, silver? By law nobody accepts payment in it, the authorities are informed and your house is stormed and your gold and silver taken away. Because the State has reasons that go above yours. Have anything else? Confiscated. In Italy the State now knows exactly how much money you have, how much you spend, how much you earn. Everything goes into a computer that decides if you're to be targeted for some "attention" by the Authorities. This is about to be the rule everywhere. Accept that as a citizen you have NO control whatsoever on your life. Unless you're a One Percenter, of course, but then you'll never feel the effects of any crisis so why bother with the problems of the peons?

    43. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      "...inflation and debt based currency is an insidious trap used to enslave all of us..."

      You said everything. The problem is that everyone has been long, long ago indoctrinated to accept this as normal and do not think about the real consequences, especially the fact that those who have control over these debts (and therefore the power to create money) have power over the world.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    44. Re: You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that the total amount of currency should be associated somewhat with the total value of the economy. Run away printing presses are bad, but so is a fixed size economy. The pie needs to get bigger so new wealth can be created when people add value to the economy. In a fixed currency situation the only parties that benefit from value being added to the economy are people already holding the currency.

    45. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An oz of gold takes less room than 10 $100 bills. And you can just dig a hole in the ground and bury it without having to worry about corrosion / humidity / whatever. You just have to remember where you dug the hole.

    46. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > is that you cannot buy anything you want with gold.

      You just have to convert to another currency first with specialized dealers. People should have at least 10-15% in gold because all paper currencies fail at some point.

      Like, would you rather have an actual pound of silver right now? Or a 1 pound bill from the bank of england? An oz. of gold or a 20 dollar bill?

    47. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by swb · · Score: 1

      I think silver has been a reasonable competitor to gold as a commodity metal. The Romans used it, I'm pretty sure the Pound Sterling is called that for a reason, the Americans used it, etc.

      It was probably because its much lower scarcity that it was used as "change" versus higher denomination/value coinage made from gold.

    48. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If the economy becomes truly unhinged, people stop working, stores close, etc than gold really is not all that great. If I am hungry and you are hungry, and neither of us imagines that changing anytime soon do you think I'll trade my pound of cheese for your gold?

      Regrettably history teaches that people sell their mothers, daughters and sisters into ... for more gold.

      But since this topic is mainly about Greece, let me quote a story from classical antiquity, where the people of a blockaded and besieged greek colonial fortified town in Asia Minor ran out of supplies. Meanwhile the attackers ran out of nerves, getting word that others are tilling their land and womenfolk back home while they laid siege for 3 years straight on the town. Everybody felt the fate of the city hanged in balance, one side would give up in a few weeks' time. The adamant citizens ate all the dogs and cats within the walls, cooked and ate all leather items, made bread out of wood dust, etc. yet they starved.

      One rich patrician then spotted a poor man who just caught two mice. On the spot, he offered to buy one for 20 denars in gold coins. The poor man then sold him BOTH mice for 40 denars. The rich guy still remained 95% as rich as he had been and survived on mice meat to see the siege army take to their boats and retreat, while the newly enriched poor guy died of hunger...

      That is the blinding power of shiny yellow gold. As long as men long for the female abdomen and females long for shiny things, like necklaces and rings for decoration, gold and precious stones will continue to represent high value. To this day, gold represents about the only measure of wealth in India and rural China, for some 3 billion people in total. Italy, Portugal and other gold-addicted countries are just rounding errors in that respect.

    49. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Malc · · Score: 1

      The value of gold, silver and bitcoins is irrelevant if there are capital controls that only allow you to with â60/day - how are you going to buy them? If you could get all you hands on your money...

    50. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The value of gold and silver is less arbitrary than paper currency or electronic bank balances in one very important way: there is no entity that can limitlessly devalue it by producing more of it. Sure, gold and silver mines exist, but they only add a little bit to the amount already in circulation. The US dollar, on the other hand, could become near-worthless overnight if the US decided to mint a whole load of trillion-dollar bills (or, equivalently issue electronic currency to the banks). This may be an unlikely scenario, but it's a possibility, and somewhat more likely in the case of other countries.

      Critically, bitcoin is like silver and gold in this respect: there's no one who can devalue it through inflation.

    51. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by khallow · · Score: 1

      That's incidentally what Japan did in 1991. And now their government owes twice as much as their GDP. So maybe that's not such a good investment.

    52. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by khallow · · Score: 1

      how are you going to buy them?

      With other goods of value. Keep in mind the original poster was speaking of using gold and silver as money. How many people buy euros with their euros?

    53. Re: You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Solandri · · Score: 2

      Eh. Don't oversell the old gold standard. For starters, a gold standard was typically a steady and persistent malaise of deflation, as economic output increased more steadily than the money supply.

      Yeah, anyone advocating returning to the gold standard needs to read some economic history to really see what things were like when we were on the gold standard. 1800-1933 saw 33 recessions/depressions - every 4 years on average - with declines in business activity or GDP of 10%, 20%, and even 30% common.

      Since going off the gold standard, we've had 13 recessions in 82 years, or every 6.3 years on average. And aside from the recessions following the Great Depression and WWII, none of them has seen GDP shrink by more than 5%.

      Zero inflation/deflation in a currency happens when the amount of currency floating around exactly matches economic productivity. With a fiat currency, a legit government tries its best to expand the money supply to maintain that balance. With a gold standard, whether you get inflation or deflation depends entirely on the ratio of economic productivity to how much new gold is mined. And don't even get me started on how disastrous it is to set a finite limit on the amount of currency you can mine, like Bitcoin does.

      Being on the gold standard doesn't mean you have solid monetary policy based on a physical good. It means your "policy" is effectively determined by how much gold people are finding and mining at any given time - its based on luck and good/bad fortune. Yes it prevents abuse by the government printing too much currency. But it avoids that potential abuse by completely removing the economy's rudder, leaving you adrift and completely at the mercy of how lucky gold miners are that year.

      The true fundamental currency is productivity. Whether you use dollars, euros, gold, or bitcoin, avoiding inflation/deflation means increasing the supply of physical/virtual currency to exactly match increases in productivity.

    54. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      The greeks have looked toward bitcoin in the past.

      That's news to me - when did *anyone* seriously consider bitcoin other than as a commodity?

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    55. Re: You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoins are kept on the block chain, safer than your buried gold. And you can transfer them to anyone one in the world, for free (almost).

    56. Re: You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greeks will appreciate those qualities after banks finally reopen.

    57. Re: You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's more to it than that. As the economy grows, as it takes more and more points of failure to cause a recession then the economy grows more stable. An economy based on agriculture falls into a recession based on the weather.

      moded previous posts -
      GLMDesigns

    58. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget all that. If it should happen that they exit Euro but are still in EU, they will flood the job markets of other European countries. Making Euros over the boarder will be the only way to survive, and because of no border controls this will be easy.

    59. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problems with silver are that it tarnishes, it's easier to counterfeit, and it has a lower density of value (meaning you need a shitload of it to equal the value of gold, and thus it's not nearly as portable). Otherwise, yes, silver can and has been used as money, but it's still a far cry from gold. The fact that central banks hold gold, not silver, neatly says it all.

    60. Re:You think Greeks want MORE electronic money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're barking up the wrong tree. The key characteristic of gold -- and the main reason to invest in it -- is the fact that it's a real (as opposed to nominal) store of value over the long term. This will protect you against currency devaluation as you've pointed out, but that doesn't mean gold would be useful as a means of common trade. For that purpose, you'd be much better off with a combination of junk silver (google it) and fiat cash. Stashing gold for the purpose of basic survival in armageddon scenarios is sort of the hard money equivalant of stashing $1000 bills. Even if you did find somebody to accept your eye-popping means of payment and break the change, you can bet that the entire town would soon know that you're "rich".

  4. Nerd Fiat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin is not the answer. The answer is to blame everything on the greeks, and BTFD.

  5. bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The greek financial crisis was brought on by a neoliberal government that promised the moon and stars, never collected tax, and drove itself into bankruptcy by securing loans (some predatory) that it could never repay. 23 years of national economic policy are coming home to roost, much as they did in the united states during the housing collapse, except the frameworks are radically different.

    Greeks aren't generally accustomed to paying tax. Free medical and social services, some wildly more generous than the average western nation, are normatives they enjoy, and expect to enjoy regardless of income. shifting greece from a two decade model of tax evasion to even moderate tax reform will be met with cars burning in the streets because the average greek voter isn't privy to the fact that the government, in order to remain popular and in power, basically spent itself into oblivion.

    exiting the euro may be the cure. Greece seems to be a country that doesn't consider capitalism in the western sense. theyve shunned the world bank strategies of privatized education and water. Evergrowing GDP. endless investment, and cloistered monied elite don't necessarily factor into the countries priorities. It will be a hard road for greece because many other nations will be very reticent to trade after an exit, but it will also afford numerous opportunities for local industry to emerge and thrive.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greece's tax share of GDP in the decade pre-recession averaged circa ~40%. There may have been a lot of tax evasion, but it didn't get the tax share of output under a third or so at the lowest.

      Greece's problem, as you elaborate, is that it's full of spongers. Trust the country that invented democracy to make the biggest mess of it.

      The solution, as always, is to get rid of democracy. We can quibble over what's best to replace it, but democracy has had its day and is currently failing worldwide.

      They should leave the EU and Euro (if they won't, they should be expelled), reinstitute the drachma, and default on all or part of their public debts.

      No-one with any sense will ever lend a cent to Greece again, and Greece will have to fix its own problems for a change. Everyone wins.

    2. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      What would exiting the Euro actually accomplish? Greek banks have been fundamentally reliant on the Emergency Liquidity Assistance funding since February this year, when the ECB stopped accepting bonds guaranteed by the Greek government as collateral for loans, following the direction that the general financial markets have been taking for some months previous to that. So the Bank of Greece would still need to borrow money from somewhere, and exiting the Euro doesn't make borrowing suddenly easier....

    3. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The greek financial crisis was brought on by a neoliberal government ....

      Please do explain how a party that calls itself "Pan Hellenic Socialist Movement" which was in power in Greece for 9 of the past 14 legislative periods can possibly be labelled "neoliberal". Socialist parties can be called many things. Most definitely not neoliberal.

    4. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by neilo_1701D · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exiting the Euro gives them some control over their destiny.

      A country that is in such poor economic shape generally has it's currency devalued. This has two effects: first, imports are suddenly more expensive; and second exports are suddenly cheaper for the rest of the world to buy. As the economic mess cleans up, you have a capital inflow into the country, liquidity frees up and things get better.

      Now Greece (or any other country in the EU): They don't have their own currency; they use the EU's. So they can't allow their currency to devalue; they are dragged along by the strength of the German economy, which effectively determines the value of the Euro. They can't control their economic destiny.

      Exiting the Euro may be the only option to give the Greek economy exactly what it needs: a savage, sharp recession to flush out all the inefficiencies and get back to making stuff and exporting it. Or just producing enough for domestic consumption; that'll do. Staying in the EU probably means that it's going to be a long, drawn-out and painful process.

    5. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Shaitan · · Score: 0

      agreed the greeks definitely handled credit poorly. On the other hand they were fine before the Euro.

    6. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exiting the euro may be the cure. Greece seems to be a country that doesn't consider capitalism in the western sense

      That's because Capitalism in the western sense is a bullshit set of lies founded on impossible assumptions.

      theyve shunned the world bank strategies of privatized education and water. Evergrowing GDP. endless investment, and cloistered monied elite

      Yes, those are some of them.

      Capitalism, in the western sense, is a suicide pact of trying harder and harder to make something which is utterly unsustainable work, and pretending like the constant demand for growing corporate profits actually gets us anywhere.

      American style capitalism is basically destroying the worlds economies. And it will be other countries paying the price before anybody believes this.

    7. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      The EU and the Eurozone are different. Countries can be (and many are) members of the EU without getting rid of their national currency.

      Greece never even _really_ qualified for the Euro. They faked their paperwork and then apparently suffered amnesia and forgot that they were deeply in the poo, so rather than be very conservative and hope to ride the uplift from joining the Eurozone they spent like it was going out of fashion. Then the bills started to arrive. "Use those reliable tax receipts you've told us about" said the rest of Europe "Oh, we uh, we maybe overstated those, a bit, kind of". "OK, well I'm sure your rock solid exports will see you through" "Er, yeah, so, we have to come clean, we didn't tell you exactly how much of those exports existed only on paper". "So what do you have?" "We've got a lot of poor people. And debt. Help us out here?"

      And so they're screwed. And they were always screwed. Every Greek who wasn't out protesting when their government built stuff it could never afford - but now is up in arms that their economy is in the toilet is as guilty as the people who actually signed the paperwork.

    8. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Good point. Tourism would flourish and exports would go up. Things like energy would also go up for those in Greece.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    9. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What would exiting the Euro actually accomplish?

      A lot. First of all, the money system could be in the hands of society instead of the other way around, as it is now. This could change the very definition of money for the Greeks.

      The current situation in Europe is that all the nations are under control of the European Central Bank. NOT the other way around, as the ECB is an independent institution. This independent institution however has the power to grab as much money from the nations as they want (through the "stability pact"). Even so, it is just a bank, but with the right to print money.

      Now you all know how fiat money is made, right? You have to give (well, promise) a valuable thing to the bank (the "security"), the bank puts in in the books, says "hey, we have an extra amount of money in the books!" and "lends" it out to you. I put the word "lends" between quotes, because it is not lent, but created by this bookkeping fraud. The money never existed before the loan. Off course, holding their laugh, the bank says that they are doing something risky by lending your own value out to you, so they ask usury. In Newspeak: interest. So, basically, you pay the bank to hijack your security.

      There is off course a downside to this piramid scheme: the usury that you have to pay extra has never existed and can only be generated by new loans! At some point you are lending so much to pay the usury (thus bringing more and more valuable items to the bank as security!), that loads get refused, and you will have to default or plunder even more resources to give away to the bank. That is where Greece is right now. The Greeks have nothing to loose, as they have been plundered to the bone already.

      Now what would happen if society itself (represented by the goverment for example) could issue money? In that case money could become "effort for the greater good of society" instead of "bottomless debt to an independent company". The government could pay "made up" money to people building roads, providing healthcare, etc. That money can then circulate further within society. The difference would not be that the money is made up (it is made up now also), but that money would actually get a real value. Off course, the goverment can always "unmake up" the money with taxes. But hey, taxes can be much lower. Instead of requiring high taxes in bank-debt to pay to road-building companies and to repay it and more to the ECB, the money can become its own tax! You pay in effort to society instead of in bank debt to the bank!

      Off course there is a catch: everything depends on how wise the amount of money is chosen to be paid to society. Too little, and society will issue its own currency (and pay in sigarettes, for example). Too much, and nobody will believe the numbers. Vary too fast, and the money will be unreliable. I really wish the Greek goverment a lot of wisdom.

      As an aside, if the government prints the money, they can set the rules as well. A ban on usury ("interest"), for example. Or a ban on speculation that is no more than a gambling game. Or even negative interest (some local currencies feature this) to encourage people to keep the money circulating.

      All in all, getting control over their own money is the best (and I think the only) option left to Greece.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    10. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by hjf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What the hell are you talking about?
      Argentina was in much worse shape than Greece in 2001. We restructured our debt (basically: screw you i ain't payin that). And guess what? We can get loans.

      At a ridiculous >10% annual rate, while our neighbors get it for less than 3%.

      But we can get loans. Never underestimate the greed of capitalists.

    11. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Only that Greece doesn't have much to export - mostly olives/olive oil and some seasonal fruit.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    12. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by hjf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would allow Greece to freely print money as it needs. Thus, trading "debt" for "inflation".

      This is what Argentina did back in 2001. We had our money at a fixed rate of 1 USD = 1 Peso. The country could only have as many pesos as we had dollars in the central bank.

      In 2002 we exited this scheme and made the Peso a floating currency. This allows the government to print as much money as they need to pay public employees and local suppliers.

      Is it a good solution? Yes BUT temporarily. You can live with inflation for a few years if you do things right, and use that opportunity wisely. Create industry, lay off government workers, and basically allow things to take their course.

      The problem is that Argentina has been abusing this for 12 years now. Instead of getting rid of government workers, they're taking more. They're also nationalizing railways and airlines (Aerolineas Argentinas operates at a loss of $1M a day). Instead of incentives for new jobs, they're giving away money to unemployed in "social plans".

      Reading the comments about Greeks I'm guessing they will do exactly what we did: Exit the euro, devaluate, cover salaries by printing more money. Take the unemployed into government jobs. Forbid utilities from increasing their price (but giving them "subsidies"). In 3 or 4 years Greece will be a FINE place to live. You'll see a lot of expensive cars in the streets, lots of new buildings, overall support for the government. The president will be re-elected with an overwhelming majority. And in 10 to 15 years Greece will be struggling again. How do I know? Because as an Argentinian, this is what i live with every day.

    13. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What's amazing to me is that this scenario is happening again with Argentina and they are still getting loans.

      So never underestimate the greed of capitalists, AND remember that there is a sucker born every minute.

      What I'd really like to know, though: is Kirchner crazy or is she a victim? It's hard to tell based on what I've read on BBC.

    14. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Reemi · · Score: 1

      You can only trade 'debt' for 'inflation' when your debt is in your own currency. If your debt is in any other currency then you will make things only worse.

    15. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At a ridiculous >10% annual rate, while our neighbors get it for less than 3%.

      See that? That's a risk premium.

    16. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by hjf · · Score: 1

      Kirchner is crazy.

    17. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although nothing is physically exported, in economic terms Tourism is an export (people from outside spend money in your economy).

    18. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by hjf · · Score: 1

      You can default the external debt. Really, it isn't that bad. Creditors will of course try to scare everyone away, but the truth is, it's just the investors trying to get their money back ASAP.

      A default is just "i can't pay now, i'm working things out". Creditors, sooner or later, get paid. The problem is that this credit is usually "big league" 10, 20, 30 or 50 years. Which is typical for a large international bank, or credit organization (IMF, World Bank, etc).

      So when you're a small guy who saw a 300% return rate in a small period, of course you will get mad. But it's YOUR fault: if the country is paying out such high interest, there is something very wrong and you should walk away. At that point, it's gambling, not investment.

    19. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Take the unemployed into government jobs. Forbid utilities from increasing their price (but giving them "subsidies"). In 3 or 4 years Greece will be a FINE place to live. You'll see a lot of expensive cars in the streets, lots of new buildings, overall support for the government. The president will be re-elected with an overwhelming majority. And in 10 to 15 years Greece will be struggling again. How do I know? Because as an Argentinian, this is what i live with every day.

      So Argentina "Atlas Shrugged" itself into an unholy mess? Whoda thunk it?

      Sounds like the Obama plan - free phones, free healthcare, free money!

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    20. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Reemi · · Score: 1

      Agree with all you said, should have indicate clearer my response was on the first line of your post in isolation.

      The problem for Greece will be that their debt is mainly in Euro, not in their new currency.

      Leaving the EU will be another problem for Greece. In 2013, they received 7.2 billion Euro from the EU (http://ec.europa.eu/budget/mycountry/EL/index_en.cfm) of which 59% went to 'Regional Policy' which is described as:
      The largest share of the money that Greece received from the EU budget in 2013 went to its regions (59 %). EU regional policy aims to reduce the economic, social and territorial disparities between Europe’s regions and countries. Regional funds invest in projects supporting job creation, competitiveness, economic growth, improved quality of life and sustainable development. Transport infrastructure and the environment are top priorities for Greece.

      (Note, Greece pays into the EU as well, so the balance is not 7.2 billion but nonetheless it will affect quite some ongoing projects funded by the EU)

    21. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, Greece's economy is very import oriented. Exiting the Euro would be catastrophic for Greece, which also the reason why the other EU countries tried everything they could to prevent this from happening (short of being blackmailed by Greece's current lunatic government).

    22. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by neilo_1701D · · Score: 1

      It's catastrophic to remain with the Euro, too. Acknowledging the economic & political lunacy that has been Greece over the last however many years, sticking with the Euro merely keeps the pain lingering far, far longer that another country in the same situation would.

      Suppose Greece remains with the Euro: sooner or later, prices are going to rise. If you're thinking about visiting somewhere on the Mediterranean, are you going to stay in Greece, where the prices are high, or somewhere else, where your Euro has much more buying power? Greece would enter a nasty period of stagflation with no real opportunity to break the cycle.

      The only outcome for Greece that is good in the long term means nasty times ahead in the short and medium terms. The opportunity to avoid this has been squandered buying votes; now loaning money to Greece simply keeps the problem from resolving.

    23. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surprised you aren't getting down voted. Very few people look at the economy and its state as an energy balance. If there isn't enough money coming in to pay for all the shit you want government to give you there are only two options. Tax the people who aren't in poverty to death to pay for it and still be in the hole or take out a massive amount of loans. If you tax people who aren't in poverty to the point that they are in poverty you end up in revolt, if you take out massive loans when those come due you have to default and spend less money because no one will lend you any or print money which in turn is just another form of taxation on those who aren't in poverty and you end up in revolt. Trying to use socialism to fix the fact that your books wont balance because your society is not generating enough productivity and wealth is a band aid thats destined to fail spectacularly. Social programs only work when the majority of the society don't need them in the first place.

    24. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I give you the National Socialist German Workers' Party, which was not socialist, nor did it care about German workers.

      PASOK embraced the Third Way in the late 1990s. It is not the socialism of old. The same thing happened to the UK's Labour Party, which considers itself social-democratic.

    25. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily, if they face reality and address the painful reforms that everybody wants them to address, staying within the eurozone makes a lot of sense. It is definitely the better of the two evils. (I spent the whole time of the crisis in Portugal, and while the transition was painful and everybody hated the troika as much as in Greece, the transition was doable.)

    26. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As it has been demonstrated, you can just default and the worse thing that happens is that you're locked out of financial markets.

      And being locked out of financial markets just means that irresponsible governments can't take loans. Which is a good thing because the subjects of irresponsible governments won't benefit from their government getting indebted.

    27. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with what you say but people who usually make this sort of statement seem to think that this is exclusively a problem in Greece. I think voters across the world should look to Greece as a cautionary tale. In any democracy, it is conceivable that a populist government will be elected by making these sort of promises, They will reap the benefits of swept into power and leave the mess for the next government that comes into office. Arguably, the case in Greece was not helped by the fact that they also lack strong institutions (e.g., their stats regarding debt and inflation could not be trusted).

      Case in point: Medicare Part D . What an awful piece of legislation that is likely to syphon many billions of dollars from American tax payers to drug companies. It is extremely unlikely that law could be passed today given the delicate state of our economy. However, when our economy was doing very well, the law was passed without much controversy.

      In my opinion, Greece offers lessons to each and every one of us.

    28. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Of course they can control their economic destiny. They could impose massive spending cuts, refuse to pay pensions, take big wage cuts and so on, and trigger the recession that way. But they'd rather not (no surprise)

    29. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Chalnoth · · Score: 1

      Inflation is exactly what Greece needs. But because Greece has a primary surplus, there is no reason for them to do this. Simply defaulting on their existing debt will leave them with a positive yearly balance. So they don't need to print money to pay the bills. Instead, they are free to have monetary policy focus on maintaining stable inflation, which is beneficial to economic growth (printing money to service the debt is comparatively uncontrolled and can lead to runaway inflation which isn't so nice).

    30. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 0

      Of course they're screwed. And for every Euro the Greeks owe, there's a banker in the rest of the EU that lend it to them, knowing full well that they could never pay it off, and that their government would bail them out when it would turn sour. And that's exactly what happened in 2010-2012. German Landesbanken were up in their necks in Greek debt and would topple en-masse if Greece would default. They were assuming that the German government would stand by Greece. Landesbanken are interesting banks. They are 'cooperative', meaning that they are largely controlled by German politicians. These would get into serious trouble if those banks would topple, so the German state decided that Greece could not default until the bad debt was removed from the Landesbanken and was completely socialized over the population. And then they added the rhetoric that every eurocent would be paid back to appease the populace.

      Many people actually argued at the time that both Italy and Greece were not in any shape to join the Euro, but were overruled by the Germans that needed as large a Euro-zone as France desired, in order to 'pay' for their right of unification. And that's where the trouble started. Not with the Greek lies, but with the German desire to placate France.

      Yes, the Greeks lied and cheated. The Germans did something worse. Rather than letting their banks take the hit, they let their population pay for it, and blame it on foreigners.

    31. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The solution, as always, is to get rid of democracy.

      Thanks, Adolf!

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    32. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying that Argentina did what Ayn Rand advocated a country should do? Or that they collapsed because they were led by thugs and moochers?

    33. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The greek financial crisis was brought on by a neoliberal government ....

      Please do explain how a party that calls itself "Pan Hellenic Socialist Movement" which was in power in Greece for 9 of the past 14 legislative periods can possibly be labelled "neoliberal". Socialist parties can be called many things. Most definitely not neoliberal.

      You can call your party whatever you want, it's what you actually do that matters. The government went along with the neoliberal austerity measures imposed by external creditors, which is why they lost to the anti-austerity left wing givernment at the last elections.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    34. Re:bit coin doesn't solve the strategic issue. by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Greece seems to be a country that doesn't consider capitalism in the western sense

      If true, interesting seeing as how the ancient Greek philosophies are the basis for western government and much of its underlying cultural assumptions.

  6. Let's Get This Off Our Chests First, Then Discuss by Tokolosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ponzi
    Scam
    MtGox
    Not backed by anything
    No "Full faith and credit"
    Can't pay taxes
    Money Laundering
    Drugs
    Silk Road
    DPR
    >50%
    Gold
    Executive Order 6102

    Ok, now that is out of the way, we are ready to discuss the issue at hand.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  7. Magic Stones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have some magic stones available for just this purpose. They each have a unique serial number laser engraved on them and there is only a limited run that I will be producing. This scarcity factor will make them an ideal replacement for cash in the economy, and you can trade them anonymously among yourselves to prevent the tyranny of an oppressive government.

    So come to me with your suitcases full of that worthless government backed paper money and get some of my magic stones - let us save the world together!

  8. Slashdot readers: Once in a lifetime deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Tony Gallippi, the co-founder of bitcoin payment processor Bitpay, tweeted on Sunday night that he expected the price of bitcoin to rise to between $610 and $1,250 if Greece exits the Euro. The currency is currently worth $250.

    So the conservative estimate is that your investment will more than triple, and you could potentially get returns of 500 percent.

    I don't need to listen to the ads on right wing talk radio anymore, I can get all my financial tips from Slashdot!

    1. Re:Slashdot readers: Once in a lifetime deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't need to listen to the ads on right wing talk radio anymore..." I've always been disturbed by this. If you're not a right wing radio listener: just about every single ad on right wing radio is some financial scam or another. It's depressing.

  9. Bitcoin?! My God! They would be nuts! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Few things on this planet could possibly be flakier. Greece has to do like Iceland and arrest the bankers who stole the money and empty their accounts instead of stealing from depositors.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Bitcoin?! My God! They would be nuts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with Greece is not the bankers but the government.
      The spend more money then they get in from taxes. And they wont raise the taxes or cut there expenses.

    2. Re: Bitcoin?! My God! They would be nuts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is, the one who stole money is Greek government.

    3. Re:Bitcoin?! My God! They would be nuts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem is that you don't know the difference between their and there.

    4. Re:Bitcoin?! My God! They would be nuts! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      The Greek government serves the banks, and that would be who they stole it for.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re: Bitcoin?! My God! They would be nuts! by Holi · · Score: 1

      It's not that anyone stole anything. It's that tax revenue is not enough to support spending. Heck they don't even have to increase taxes to fix this. They just need their citizens to actually pay their taxes.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    6. Re: Bitcoin?! My God! They would be nuts! by turbidostato · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Thing is, the one who stole money is Greek government."

      Yes. With the enthusiastic help of French and German governments and Goldman Sachs.

      It is not that it's some kind of a secret but, still, I find amusing that the obvious fact that current Greek situation was a well planned trap of central/northen Europe and economical lobbies against south Europe economies doesn't gather but a fraction of mindshare than the "Greeks must pay" and "Greeks lived above their means".

      Just some examples:
      * Greek economical situation was falsified by Goldman Sachs, so Greece apparently reached the required levels to enter de EU and Euro currency. German government knew it (and even now, Mario Draghi, GS ex-consultant is current head of the European Central Bank). Still, I don't see anybody asking Goldman Sachs for billionary fines and compensations.
      * Greece can't (partially) default its debts, not at least within the monetary union, still Greece hasn't still seen a dime of Germany's war compensations (I'm not even going into it's legal weight, but the obvious fact is that this helped to develop Germany's economy and now Greece is in a position to be returned the favour). Double standard anyone?
      * Greece spends a quite above average percentage of its GDP on defense (at about 2.5% -a percentage significant enough as to put an end to Greece's crisis on its own), mostly on weapons bougth to... Germany and France, mainly to protect European interests on the zone. Do you know what Germany and France are *not* saying? They are not saying "return me back our planes and tanks, which are well above the level you need for self-defense, and so part of your debt gets settled".
      * Most of the money lent to Greece isn't going to support Greek economy so it can go stronger, produce more taxes and return the debt but it is going back to Germany and other northern European countries and to support the Greek *private* banking system (again an example on the 'privatization of benefits but nationalization of loses', some "liberals" are so keen of). Even IMF concludes that no more than 11% of lends ended up being used to support the country's operations.

      All this has not to be understood as if the Greek people voluntarily decided going that path (rising defense expenses to 2.5% of GDP, allowing Goldman Sachs to falsify the accounts, giving public contracts to cronies, etc.). This all was the result of a corrupt government with aquitance of (mainly) German government and banks, which are the same that now tear their robes in anger.

      No, it was not that the Greeks were expending abover their means, it is that Germany -with the help of Greece's corrupt politicians, was robbing Greeks above their means and now Germany tries to hide their tracks just by shouting up loud.

    7. Re:Bitcoin?! My God! They would be nuts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, Iceland as a nation stole from depositors and then had a referendum to see if people supported stealing from the depositors, and they did, because it was okay, those depositors lived in Europe.

      Iceland has simply delayed the inevitable, it's not a success story, it's a ticking timebomb. It has a 220% debt to GDP ratio, and is holding much foreign currency in it's banks using capital controls. Because of this there is basically no inward investment meaning they cannot keep growing for long because they'll not be able to borrow the necessary assets to do so. They wont see inward investment until they remove the capital controls, but if they remove the capital controls then at least initially many billions of foreign reserves that have been held in place by those controls will leave the country, which, with their 220% debt to GDP burden means complete economic collapse.

      Even if they retain the status quo indefinitely, it also means Icelandic businesses cannot safely expand abroad because similarly Icelandic assets could be seized to pay for the money they originally stole.

      So no, Iceland is not a model you want to follow unless you want your entire existence to be based on isolationism and the nervousness of sitting on a permanently ticking timebomb that could blow at literally any moment. No inward investment, no safe way to outwardly invest and an insurmountable debt mountain.

    8. Re:Bitcoin?! My God! They would be nuts! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Iceland doesn't need 'investments'. They have enough free energy to do what they want. They stole nothing, they only took back what was theirs. The 'depositors' were foreign banks profiteering from junk bonds, not real people. The 'debt' is phony, a fraud, existing only in the fantasy derivatives markets. And why does Iceland need to 'grow'? What an absurd concept! No, Iceland is in a much better position than anybody else.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    9. Re: Bitcoin?! My God! They would be nuts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make a lot of interesting assertions, but don't provide any references, so it's interesting you got +5 insightful. I did some google searches to try to find more information, but the only similar references seems to be on conspiracy theory websites about the New World Order and other lunacy. Please provide some references so I can learn more!

    10. Re: Bitcoin?! My God! They would be nuts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not that it's some kind of a secret but, still, I find amusing that the obvious fact that current Greek situation was a well planned trap of central/northen Europe and economical lobbies against south Europe economies doesn't gather but a fraction of mindshare than the "Greeks must pay" and "Greeks lived above their means".

      Ah, well, straight into conspiracy theory from the beginning, glad you cleared that up.

      I, for one, find it amusing how quickly you dismissed the statement you replied to. Granted, the 'Greek government stole the money' is an over-simplification, but the alacrity with which you move past it to lay the blame to Germany and France is remarkable. So, let's see.

      • Goldman falsifying the financial situation of Greece to facilitate euro entry. Really? you're bringing up the pre-euro deal instead of the post-euro swaps that were done to hide the fact that Greece's deficit levels were higher than what the Maastricht treaty allowed? I mean, correcting a previously declared 7% to a whooping 12.7% debt level in 2010 is ... all Goldman's fault, right? Did they file the paperwork to Eurostat themselves, too? Regardless, it's just one more Goldman deal, so your argument ... stands? Yet you seem to conveniently ignore that Greece needed the swaps to hide a pre-existing debt level that was too high for European treaties, both for joining and later for being in the euro. Are you going to blame outsiders (Goldman or not) for that pre-existing debt as well?
      • war compensations. All I'm going to say about that is, timing and insistence here make the claim suspect. Some parts of the world have something called statute of limitations - and while 70 years might still qualify in some situations, Greece can hardly claim that it was in no position to pursue the damages during all this time. Anyway, there can be merit to the war compensations issue and I'm not opposed to the idea, but (1) it is entirely unrelated to the crisis (and only brought up in populist discourse) and (2) what is still stopping Greece from formally trying to solve it? Saying you should give me that much money without ever initiating proceedings to at least legally determine if and how much is actually owed is disingenuous.
      • Military budget. I guess this is a clear example of an agenda not bothering with contradicting facts. According to this 2013 piece more than 70% of Greece's military budget at the time was personnel costs, so arms buying was not the largest slice. (see what I did there? it's called references. Practice it.) Also, you might want to consider returning arms to the US first - while Greece is the largest single buyer for German and French weapons, those together are less than its US weapons purchases. But I guess that does not fit with the Northern Europe narrative (hey, when did the French become northerners?)
      • Money not supporting the Greek economy. You're conveniently ignoring facilities like the ELA that put money directly into the Greek economy, via its banks - how else do you think Greek banks would have afforded all the withdrawals happening lately? - while again ignoring the fact that those money do not bring about growth. Well, it's in line with the fact that Greece's deficit spending, when corrected for the pre-2010 lies to Eurostat, did not produce a commensurate economic growth. It makes one wonder how long did Greece expect to be able to keep it up.

      Now, blame is a funny thing, and seeing how one apportions it gives a useful insight on which side of a fence one is. The list above is by no means exhaustive and it is one-sided only because it tries to put some paint on paper areas that you intentionally left blank. There's also paint to be placed on the other side of the paper, and in fact you've been doing a very poor job of it as well. My advice to you is, do your homework, p

  10. Yeah, I'm sure that's the answer by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...he expected the price of bitcoin to rise to between $610 and $1,250 if Greece exits the Euro. The currency is currently worth $250.

    I know when my country is looking at economic collapse I'd look to move all my money into a currency that's going to double-quintuple in value nearly overnight. That's the stability I want and look for. Plus think of the literally 2 or 3 actual real retailer in the country that even know what a bitcoin is, let alone accept it for payments that I'll be able to spend my new found wealth

    1. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that's the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go home, grandpa.

    2. Re: Yeah, I'm sure that's the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you should buy an honored currency. Precious metals, foreign bonds/currencies, and other foreign investments.

      Bitcoin is a sham.

    3. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that's the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem that comes to mind is the way taxes are computed in Greece. My recollection is iffy, so I await a Greek to correct me, but I remember that they collect receipts to show that they are spending money in the economy, to pay less taxes. If you go with Bitcoin, presumably you don't get this receipt, so if you want people to accept your San Francisco based fantasyland, you also have to rewrite the Greek tax code to match.

    4. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that's the answer by neilo_1701D · · Score: 1

      I know when my country is looking at economic collapse I'd look to move all my money into a currency that's going to double-quintuple in value nearly overnight.

      I'm buying food, fuel, guns and bullets. You can have all the gold in the world, ans I'm not trading it for my gallon of fuel.

    5. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that's the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm buying food, fuel, guns and bullets. You can have all the gold in the world, ans I'm not trading it for my gallon of fuel.

      Okay, but it degrades, which would make it mostly useless. Feel free to waste your money though.

    6. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that's the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A massive movement to a currency that's going to double overnight is not stability. It's a (possible) profit making move, because the currency is volatile (the opposite of stable).

      The problem with profit making volatile currencies is that they also tend to be volatile in both directions, so if the profit making is realized, a lot (not all) of people will wait for the bitcoin to drop or crash before exchanging with currencies that don't see 100% overnight valuation. It could effectively sequester money into a virtual bank (the currency) where one can't even get the equivalent of 60 euros out in a withdrawal.

    7. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that's the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know when my country is looking at economic collapse I'd look to move all my money into a currency that's going to double-quintuple in value nearly overnight. That's the stability I want and look for. Plus think of the literally 2 or 3 actual real retailer in the country that even know what a bitcoin is, let alone accept it for payments that I'll be able to spend my new found wealth

      The point of using BTC as a hedge isn't that you expect BTC to rise relative to the USD or the Euro. It's that if you owned $10K Euro pre-collapse (which would buy a cheap used car), you'd like to end with $10K Euro after the collapse.

      What you don't want is to wake up the morning after the collapse with $20K Drachmas in your bank account and discover that although you now have twice as many drachmas, a cheap used car now costs about a million drachma. But hey, your bank exchanged Drachmas for Euros on a 2:1 basis, which was what the government told it to do.

      So ideally, you withdraw your Euros and you buy BTC. You hold the coins offline until the dust settles. And against the 500:1 loss you would have faced by keeping your money in the bank, it doesn't matter whether the Euro:BTC exchange rate went 50% in your favor or 50% against you, because when you sell your BTC for post-crash Drachma, because whether you end up with 250K drachma or 750K drachma (and even if you pay 50% taxes on it, leaving you with 125K-375K!), you're way ahead of the guy who woke up with 20K drachma.

    8. Re: Yeah, I'm sure that's the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was being sarcastic you ass hat. Go back in your bunker and wait for the zombie apocalypse.

    9. Re: Yeah, I'm sure that's the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds mighty fine, except for the fact that they are not allowed to withdraw large sums of money. They are only allowed ~60 euros a day.

    10. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that's the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have the guns, he has the gold. Why do you need to trade?

  11. Stability by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

    How is a jump from $250 per unit to between $610 and $1250 (an increase of between 244% and 500% against the dollar) any more stable than either the Euro (~15% fall over the Dollar during the past year or so), the GBP (~10% rise over the dollar during the past year or so).

    Something doesn't make sense.

    1. Re:Stability by Junta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention that 1Y ago it was $650 per unit, and was almost $1000 a year before that.

      So on top of a massive inflation over two years, they are saying they are so stable they predict a 200-300% deflation thanks to how awesomely stable it is...

      I don't understand how anyone can testify to the stability of bitcoin with a straight face.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:Stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, you see, you are looking at it wrong. Bitcoin *is* stable, it's the other currencies that fluctuate wildly (yet almost perfectly synchronised with each other for some reason which probably has to do with them being fiat currencies).

    3. Re:Stability by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Something doesn't make sense.

      The Euro is the go-to safe haven currency.

      The problem is that any Euros stored in a bank are liable to be seized and replaced with drachmas (greece leaves the euro, "grexit"), or possibly legislatively forbidden to leave the nation ("capital controls" - likely to lead to grexit). As you can imagine, these threats has led to lots of people withdrawing real Euros while they still can, depleting Greek banks of deposits, requiring emergency bailout/loans from the IMF and ECB. Now that line of credit has been maxed, they're not being offered any more, so as of last weekend or so the banks are closed and won't let anyone withdraw money.

      So one pitch for bitcoin here is that it's more stable than a euro contained in a Greek bank. Of course, that's not going to do you much good if you can't get the euros out of the bank to buy the bitcoins. I guess the other is that it could help you either circumvent (legally) or violate (illegally) any future capital controls (good old-fashioned black-market currency dealing, also popular in China sometimes). We'll see about that.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    4. Re:Stability by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I think their (poorly expressed) point is that euros are more likely to be seized than bitcoins and become valueless. Going from 'value' to 'zero value' is less stable than wild value swings.

      I'm not sure that point is true either.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly!

      People praise bitcoin as a great replacement currency and then those same people back that up with the increased valuation of bitcoin vs other currencies. The fact that it's value increases makes it a fundamentally bad currency (at least to most economists) because people won't spend it. A good currency has a slow and controlled inflation. That is not bitcoin.

    6. Re:stability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot stability.

      This is a discussion about the Greek economy. The word stability doesn't belong.

  12. Re:What an opportunity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly like Cyprus. Go ahead and buy bitcoin now, at a mere $250 / 1 before it gets to ~$800. I'm sure all the Cypriots that bought into it and saw it crashing down to a quarter of its price were overwhelmed with joy.

    That doesn't make any sense for the ones who bought at $800; they'd be upset because they LOST 75% of their money! The only Cypriots who should be happy right now are the ones who bought in at around March 2013, before the late 2013 bitcoin bubble, because the price is still a lot higher now than it was before the Cypriot crisis.

  13. Austerity or... by alex67500 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The country can't pay its debts, and the upcoming referendum will decide whether they face increased austerity measures or start the process of exiting the Euro and face even worse austerity.

    FTFY.

    Leaving the Euro will mean that the country has defaulted, and whatever currency they put in place will have no value at all. The government will be bankrupt and will not be able to pay civil servants or pensioners. There are only 3 ways this goes:
    - Creditors accept to write-off some of the debt. They cut their losses and allow Grece to survive, in a situation which is actually bearable.
    - More austerity, from inside the euro. Hard times ahead.
    - Default. Chaos, Civil War.

    Humanity and Finance don't go together very well...

    1. Re:Austerity or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The new drachma will have value. Just much less than the current euro. After a few months, travelers from the continent will notice what a great deal Greek travel his and will flock there in huge numbers. That will help reflate and re-equilibrate the drachma. As for the pensioners. They're screwed. But they've lived for decades screwing young Greeks, so we can call it even.

    2. Re:Austerity or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Creditors accept to write-off some of the debt. They cut their losses and allow Grece to survive, in a situation which is actually bearable.

      But as an EU citizen, and not Greek, why would I accept this? They've had plenty of time to get their shit together. Hell, had they not cooked the books for so long, they wouldn't be in this shit in the first place, at least not so deep in it. If we allow yet another bailout for them, who's to say they will be any better in the future? I say good riddance and boot them out of the Euro. For that matter, all of Southern Europe, fiscal responsibility and avoiding corruption seems to be a totally foreign concept to that region.

    3. Re:Austerity or... by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      One wonders if there will be any attempt at bringing to justice the various EU and Greek officials involved in getting Greece in to begin with. The books were cooked to make it look like Greece was ready when it most certainly wasn't and now it's all come home to roost, big time.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    4. Re:Austerity or... by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Leaving the Euro will mean that the country has defaulted"

      Partially, yes.

      "and whatever currency they put in place will have no value at all."

      Absolutly wrong. It is wrong in theory, and it has been shown wrong in practice lots of time. It is not as if it were the first time a nation restorts to devaluate its currency.

      "The government will be bankrupt and will not be able to pay civil servants or pensioners."

      That's stupid beyond contempt. If anything, they will have zero problems paying civil servants or pensioners, the problems will be anywhere else but certainly not in paying their internal, publicly-backed obligations: under their own currency they will be able to print as much money as they need to cover them! Of course, the standard output will be skyrocketing inflation but, as long as they have a mildly honest government (what a contrast with later ones) they'll manage to maintain it within 15-20%.

      "There are only 3 ways this goes:"

      The only reasonble one is the first one: creditors accept to write-off some debt. Not any kind of debt, but only the part that was fradulently imposed on Greece (Goldman Sach bonds, military over-expending and other fraudulent contracts). At the same time Greece needs to put as much effort and money as needed to put to an end to tax fraud, mainly from big fortunes as well as a stronger progressive tax law centered on direct taxes, not indirect like VAT as the IMF insists on doing. With only this, there will be no need to touch VAT, pensions, healthcare or education.

    5. Re:Austerity or... by hjf · · Score: 1

      None of the 3 you described. Only a Sith deals in absolutes. Normal people reach a middle ground.
      See Argentina's economic crisis of 2001-2002 to see what hapens with Greece: a combination of Default (without civil war), debt restructuring (or writeoff as you called it), and lots of inflation to cover salaries.
      And just like in Argentina: it ends up bad 10 years later with "free money" for government.

    6. Re:Austerity or... by hjf · · Score: 1

      Suits you for trying to make an economic agreement with people you KNOW are scum.

    7. Re:Austerity or... by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Do you wish to point me to some reference that shows the Spanish government was fiscally irresponsible prior to the global financial crisis in 2008 please?

      Perhaps before you start tarring everyone from southern Europe with the same brush you might want to get your facts straight. Oh and I am from northern Europe and outside the Euro for the record.

    8. Re:Austerity or... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Argentina defaulted, and while it was hard for a few years they have come out of it pretty well. If anything Greece should have done it earlier, rather than go through 5 years of pain and austerity only to end up doing it anyway.

      The Eurozone countries really don't want Greece to leave the Euro though. Apart from damaging the Euro itself, it would just encourage other countries to do similar things when times got tough.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Austerity or... by marsu_k · · Score: 1

      Not any kind of debt, but only the part that was fradulently imposed on Greece (Goldman Sach bonds, military over-expending and other fraudulent contracts).

      You are saying this as if these were somehow imposed upon the Greek. There were other players, sure, but it takes two to tango.

    10. Re:Austerity or... by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Greece needs to put as much effort and money as needed to put to an end to tax fraud, mainly from big fortunes as well as a stronger progressive tax law centered on direct taxes, not indirect like VAT as the IMF insists on doing. With only this, there will be no need to touch VAT, pensions, healthcare or education.

      This is extremely optimistic. But your post helps me understand the Greek viewpoint. They are in for some hard times.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    11. Re:Austerity or... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      " Only a Sith deals in absolutes."

      This statement is itsself an absolute. Thus anyone who makes this claim must be a sith.

    12. Re:Austerity or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if they print their own money, they have all the money in the world. People will get paid. But they will not be able to buy much of anything imported.

      It also means that vacation in Greece will become super cheap, as everyone is clamoring for foreign currency (by everyone, I mean everyone in Greece, including the government).

    13. Re:Austerity or... by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "You are saying this as if these were somehow imposed upon the Greek."

      That was exactly the case.

      "it takes two to tango."

      Yes. The question is, which two? It was German (mainly, and Frech, and others) interests and corrupted Greek politicians the ones dancing, liyng to the Greek people which had no saying in this issues (because they didn't have the means to know).

    14. Re:Austerity or... by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "This is extremely optimistic."

      Yes, it is. It counts on honest politicians and a transparent system and, of course, further economical help to reach its intended goal (Greek productivity) instead of returning back to Germany without even show in Greek soil so, yes, extremly optimistic.

      But not unreal. It only takes to have a look at Greek GDP and expenditures build up to know.

    15. Re:Austerity or... by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      Argentina defaulted, and while it was hard for a few years they have come out of it pretty well.

      No they haven't. They are still very bad off ten years after the default, they even would have gotten into bad troubles again recently if they had followed the law, only because some private (!) investor wanted his money back.

    16. Re:Austerity or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know the differences between geeks and nerds.

    17. Re:Austerity or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humanity and _Responsibility_ don't go together very well... FTFY

    18. Re:Austerity or... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >> some reference that shows the Spanish government was fiscally irresponsible prior to the global financial crisis in 2008

      I'll bite. TLDR: they spent too much money and allowed their banks to behave irresponsibly.

      "...ballooning tax revenues (from the artificially high GDP growth rate) concealed the Spanish government's expenditures, which were unsustainably high, until 2007. The Spanish government supported the critical development by relaxing supervision of the financial sector and thereby allowing the banks to violate International Accounting Standards Board standards. So the banks in Spain were able to hide losses and earnings volatility, mislead regulators, analysts, and investors, and thereby finance the Spanish real estate bubble. The results of the crisis were devastating for Spain, including a strong economic downturn, a severe increase in unemployment, and bankruptcies of major companies." ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... )

    19. Re:Austerity or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could have been better, that default, without increased spending afterwards. But yeah, devaluation on it's own is usually a good thing. It's essentially why governments went off the gold standard, to be able to devalue more subtly.

    20. Re:Austerity or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Creditors accept to write-off some of the debt. They cut their losses and allow Grece to survive, in a situation which is actually bearable.

      But as an EU citizen, and not Greek, why would I accept this?

      Because you are a decent human being?

    21. Re:Austerity or... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Default. Chaos, Civil War.

      A little nostalgia for 1965, eh?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    22. Re:Austerity or... by marsu_k · · Score: 1

      Admittedly I don't follow the stock market so closely, or at all - but at what point did Goldman Sachs become a German and/or French company? You know, the ones that helped the Greek government become a part of EMU/Euro, which they never should have been a part of?

    23. Re:Austerity or... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      What plan are you talking about to increase Greek productivity?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    24. Re:Austerity or... by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "at what point did Goldman Sachs become a German and/or French company?"

      Of course Goldman Sachs is not a EU company itself (while with a branch incorporated in Europe and still a big company with their hands dirty in quite some national-level crisis), but it is not companies the ones that do things; it is people, and the ties between Goldman Sachs execs and these governments and agencies are hurtingly notorious. In example:

      Mario Monti: Prime Minister of Italy, ex Goldman Sachs.

      Mario Draghi: European Central Bank's Director, ex Goldman Sachs

      Lucas Papademos: Greece Prime Minister, ex Goldman Sachs

      Petros Christodoulus: Head of Greece's debt management agency, ex Goldman Sachs

      Otmar Issing: board member of Bundesbank and ECB, ex Goldman Sachs

      Karel Van Miert: EU Competition Comissioner, ex Goldman Sachs

      Peter Shutherland: Attorney General of Ireland and prominent voice during Irish bail-out, ex Goldman Sachs

      Antonio Borges: head of the IMF's European Dpt. ex Goldman Sachs

    25. Re:Austerity or... by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "What plan are you talking about to increase Greek productivity?"

      No need for too many magic recipies. Basically the same path that worked for Greece between the fifties and seventies would also work now.

    26. Re:Austerity or... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The fifties to the seventies saw the recovery from world war 2 (and internal war), and a lot of money from the US to Greece. That's not going to happen again.

      Or is there a different plan you are talking about?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    27. Re:Austerity or... by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Or is there a different plan you are talking about?"

      No, I'm not talking of a different plan. It's only the part you omited. It was not the money lended back then -or else Greece would be nowadays a buoyant economy as no less money has been lent in the past five years, but what was done with the money: Greece is still in the same place it was, opened to turism and a gate between Eurasia and Black Sea/Mediterranean; it still owns the biggest merchant fleet. It still has powerful basic infrastructures and a chance to grow both in quality agriculture and knowledge industries.

    28. Re:Austerity or... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      ok, so what are you saying? What should be done, then?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    29. Re:Austerity or... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Suits you for trying to make an economic agreement with people you KNOW are scum.

      Hey, don't be so hard on the Germans.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    30. Re:Austerity or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD DOWN you know nothing about economics. Default and start over with new currency is by far the best option and it would most certainly not have no value at all

    31. Re:Austerity or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know the difference between a penis and a vagina?

  14. Incorrect headline. by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    It should read. "Is the Greek financial crisis an opportunity for Bitcoin?"

    And thus, the answer is "NO!"

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:Incorrect headline. by Canth7 · · Score: 1

      It should read. "Is the Greek financial crisis an opportunity for Bitcoin?"

      And thus, the answer is "NO!"

      Agreed, it's not an opportunity today. It could be an advertisement for Argentines or say Chinese concerned about the state of their monetary system and what that means for their personal wealth in the future. If 10% of one's cash holdings were BTC, worst case one is down 10%. In the best case, one is down 90% since the fiat is confiscated or worthless, but there is a hedge if BTC takes off. Localbitcoins.com - there's always a way to get some cash for your BTC. Can't always say that about your bank account...

    2. Re:Incorrect headline. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that assumes you'll be able to convert bit coins to anything useful to you. Even if there were merchants who traded in bitcoin in good times, why would you think they would be able to continue to do so if the government imposed a "local currency only" rule? Bitcoin isn't made of unicorn manure, just the regular kind of bullshit.

      Seriously, how would someone be able to use bitcoin? If you were in Greece right now and had $100,000 worth of bitcoin what could you actually *do* with it? You can't buy food. You can't buy petrol. You can't pay your rent. It would be easier to smuggle out of the country than $100,000 of cash, but that is about it.

    3. Re:Incorrect headline. by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      I suspect that there will be a big increase in businesses willing to accept bitcoin.

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  15. Re:What an opportunity! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    "capital controls..." "Exactly like Cyprus."

    Right! Except they left the London branches open so the Russian mob could get their money out real quick. Ah, well... austerity or war, take your pick

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  16. The vote is too late, it won't make any difference by trybywrench · · Score: 2

    They vote is too late, they will default. Yves Smith over at NakedCapitalism lays it out nicely.

    "We described in detail how the referendum scheduled in Greece for next Sunday, July 5, is a cynical exercise in democracy theater. The Greek people are being asked to vote on a (draft) proposal by Greece’s lenders to unlock €7.2 billion in funds, the last portion of the so-called “second bailout” agreed by the Greek government in 2012. Tsipras knew at the time he announced the referendum that the proposal expired on June 30; that was the known-well-in-advance final date for the bailout terms to be agreed if each and every one of the 18 Eurozone countries agreed. We said it was a no-brainer that they would not agree; in Germany as with some of the other countries, it would require parliamentary approval to accommodate Greece’s too-late request, and there was no reason for any of them to cut Greece slack when the government has plenty of opportunity to schedule the vote in time, so it actually would inform the government’s actions.

    Instead, Tsipras has already taken the decision to miss the €1.6 billion IMF payment due June 30 and the €3.5 billion ECB payment that falls on July 20, while falsely telling Greek citizens that they have a say in this momentous choice."

    http://www.nakedcapitalism.com...

    --
    I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
  17. Re:Let's Get This Off Our Chests First, Then Discu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aww, it's cute that you think you can play crypto-economist!

  18. Re:The vote is too late, it won't make any differe by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    What he doesn't get is that the more Tsipras delayed the referendum the more time he gave for people to get their money out of their bank accounts.

    That's why it took so long.

  19. Forbes Magazine Article by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

    An interesting article in Forbes (http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2015/06/28/so-greece-has-imposed-capital-controls-too-bad-its-just-for-the-normal-people/) makes the point that the rich and the smart money left Greek a few months ago, and it is Joe Sixpack that is trapped and going to get shafted.

    The only solution offered for this problem is to insist in future that politicians and bankers behave. Bitcoin is not mentioned. Take your pick, who do you trust? - political behavior modification or the blockchain? Alexis Tsipras or Satoshi Nakamoto?

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    1. Re:Forbes Magazine Article by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

      >> he rich and the smart money left Greek a few months ago, and it is Joe Sixpack that is trapped and going to get shafted

      Pretty much this, and there's been plenty of coverage for anyone who would listen, but I'll bet it wasn't on the evening TV news (or whatever "Joe Sixpack" consumes in Greece).

      "New Greek bank run begins" (Feb 25)
      http://www.naturalnews.com/048...

      "'Slow motion' bank run continues" (June 17)
      http://www.forbes.com/sites/ti...

      "Banks impose a 3,000 Euro withdrawal cap" (June 22)
      http://www.zerohedge.com/news/...

    2. Re:Forbes Magazine Article by hjf · · Score: 1

      Political behavior: government solves problems for me and gives me free money.
      Bitcoin: cold, hard math.

      GUESS.

  20. Greece also had a very low retirement age by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Just 2 years ago the legal retirement age in Greece was 57. I think it's been changed to 61 now and there was talk of moving it to 63, but generations of Greeks have been coddled and given so many handouts by the government that they are going to riot if they have to face reality. As you point out, bit coin can't solve the problem of an entire nation so addicted to entitlements that it can't accept any way out of the crisis that doesn't involve no changes or hardships at all.

    1. Re: Greece also had a very low retirement age by periklisv · · Score: 1

      Check your facts. The general retirement age was 65 OR 58 with 35 years of labour. It is now 67 OR 60 with 40 years of work.

    2. Re:Greece also had a very low retirement age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...addicted to entitlements...

      Fuck everybody! In a world that intentionally throws away more then half of what we produce, damn right they're entitled! And so is anybody else who has to work more than one hour to buy a case of decent(!) beer. What are you assholes hoarding your useless money for anyway? To starve people, right? Gotta keep prices up to support the industry that keeps you in power. I watch your fucking farmers throw thousands of gallons of milk into the ditch. And you complain about the Greeks. You all suck! Shame on you!

    3. Re: Greece also had a very low retirement age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We hoard money and resources to keep them from falling in the hands of the unworthy like you and the other peons. Face it, when one of you smallfolk gets to handle some real money - through the lottery or inheritance usually - you squander it in months or less. Resources spent on you are wasted. Yes, we hoard the money: we know how to use it. Yes, we keep prices high: you smallfolk don't understand the value of anything. And yes, we dictate the rules: you can't even tie your shoelaces on your own. You need masters, while we don't need servants - not so many anyways. This is going to be addressed soon.

  21. Re:Let's Get This Off Our Chests First, Then Discu by Holi · · Score: 1

    You forgot stability.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  22. More like it's an opportunity for con men by DrXym · · Score: 0
    Bitcoin has repeatedly demonstrated that it's nothing more than a ponzi - stoke up fears in a currency or appeal to their greed, wait for people to buy in and then exit with the different.

    No matter how bad the Greek crisis gets, no matter how much of a haircut people get on their savings from any currency swap, it will still be less risk than bitcoin.

    1. Re:More like it's an opportunity for con men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speculators Speculate that Speculative Currency will Rise In Value

      Film at 11

  23. Attractive compared to what? by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One side effect of the crisis is that alternative currencies like Bitcoin suddenly look much more attractive as the "normal" currencies become unstable.

    Bitcoin will not be more stable or attractive than other currencies including the dollar or probably even the euro except in some weird corner cases. If someone is putting money into bitcoin because they think it is even relatively stable then they are an idiot. If someone wants to use bitcoin to transfer money then there is a relatively small risk there but you'd have to be pretty dumb to just buy and hold bitcoins for any substantial length of time. Even if Greece does exit the Euro it isn't going to make bitcoin meaningfully more sensible than it already is. If someone wants to swap currencies to hedge against currency fluctuations I can think of a huge number of options I'd consider long before bitcoin for that purpose.

    Tony Gallippi, the co-founder of bitcoin payment processor Bitpay, tweeted on Sunday night that he expected the price of bitcoin to rise to between $610 and $1,250 if Greece exits the Euro. The currency is currently worth $250.

    I rest my case. If it can go up that fast then it can (and probably will) go down just as fast. Bitcoin is not a place anyone should be comfortable keeping their money for long unless they are speculating.

    1. Re:Attractive compared to what? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      It sure will be attractive compared to the new drachma.

    2. Re:Attractive compared to what? by Shaitan · · Score: 0

      "If someone wants to use bitcoin to transfer money then there is a relatively small risk there but you'd have to be pretty dumb to just buy and hold bitcoins for any substantial length of time."

      Bitcoin swings but has historically bubbled and crashed with each bubble peaking over the previous. Smooth our those peaks and valleys and you have a constant upward progression.

  24. Clearly bitcoin is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tony Gallippi had no idea about economics or the real world. Inflation is already high in Greece which prevents people from buying bitcoin and with yesterday's news the people certainly cannot afford to buy bitcoin.

    Besides what good is bitcoin if you cannot buy food or pay bills? You exchange your bitcoin at a bank? A bank with no money? A smart person would have purchased gold, silver, or some other commodity that will sustain it's value.

    Bitcoin is nothing but a tax on stupid people.

    1. Re:Clearly bitcoin is the answer by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      Bitcoin is nothing but a tax on stupid people.

      If you had a choice between buying a one dollar lottery ticket every day or one dollar worth of Bitcoin, which would you chose?

    2. Re:Clearly bitcoin is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'd stuff the dollar into a mattress

    3. Re:Clearly bitcoin is the answer by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      That is not one of the two options.

    4. Re:Clearly bitcoin is the answer by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have the dollar each day.

    5. Re:Clearly bitcoin is the answer by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      That's the point, there are three or more options when a foolish person thinks there are only two given him

    6. Re:Clearly bitcoin is the answer by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      That is not one of the two options.

      You make a good point - BTC is only useful if you have no other options. That being said, there is not a single spot on earth where you have no options other than BTC, which makes BTC slightly less desirable than a chocolate teapot.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    7. Re:Clearly bitcoin is the answer by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      That is not one of the two options.

      "So would you rather be tortured horribly to death over four days or five days?"

      "I'll just pass on the torture and death altogether thanks".

      "Oh, ok, I hadn't thought of that".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  25. Heard that before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a thought experiment, imagine there was a base metal as scarce as gold but with the following properties:
    – boring grey in colour
    – not a good conductor of electricity
    – not particularly strong, but not ductile or easily malleable either
    – not useful for any practical or ornamental purpose
    and one special, magical property:
    – can be transported over a communications channel
    If it somehow acquired any value at all for whatever reason, then anyone wanting to transfer wealth over a long distance could buy some, transmit it, and have the recipient sell it.
    Maybe it could get an initial value circularly as you’ve suggested, by people foreseeing its potential usefulness for exchange. (I would definitely want some) Maybe collectors, any random reason could spark it.

    1. Re:Heard that before by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      As another thought experiment, imagine that there was a horse with the following properties:
      - Pink in color
      - Of appealing physical proportions
      - Has a single long, straight horn projecting from its forehead.
      - Possesses the ability to fly.

      It would undoubtedly have significant value to collectors, and I would certainly want one.

    2. Re:Heard that before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a thought experiment, imagine there was a base metal as scarce as gold but with the following properties: – boring grey in colour – not a good conductor of electricity – not particularly strong, but not ductile or easily malleable either – not useful for any practical or ornamental purpose and one special, magical property: – can be transported over a communications channel If it somehow acquired any value at all for whatever reason, then anyone wanting to transfer wealth over a long distance could buy some, transmit it, and have the recipient sell it. Maybe it could get an initial value circularly as you’ve suggested, by people foreseeing its potential usefulness for exchange. (I would definitely want some) Maybe collectors, any random reason could spark it.

      Oh I have no doubt you could circularly convince others that my magic stones were valuable.

      The more pertinent point is that while you suckers are busy discussing that, I've made off with piles of real money in exchange for a bunch of worthless stones!

    3. Re:Heard that before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      real money

      lol oxymoron bro; value is subjective

  26. Re:Let's Get This Off Our Chests First, Then Discu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget Ransomware (Cryptowall and the like)

  27. Re:What an opportunity! by cheesybagel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah. Actually Bitcoin is a terrible idea. To replace one deflationary currency they can't print (Euro) for another (Bitcoin).

    No my dear friend. It's fiat currency they need right now.

  28. Greek Financial Crisis opportunity for ArcadeMan by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1, Funny

    Follow my links for free bitcoins and dogecoins!

  29. Correction about the referendum topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correction about the referendum topic: There is only one question. "Do you agree with the proposed program of the troika?".
    ((NO != "we want to exit the euro") && (NO != government will push for euro exit))
    PS: Greek here.

  30. Re:Let's Get This Off Our Chests First, Then Discu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since we aren't thinking for ourselves on technical or economic matters, maybe we should just redirect all bitcoin stories to the Federal Reserve homepage and be done with it.

  31. Gold will not solve this problem by sjbe · · Score: 2

    The problem most Greeks suddenly face is that their money is now locked up as electronic balances in banks that have shut down for a week and won't let them have more than 60 euros at a time.

    They'd have a LOT bigger problem if there was a bank run. Then a lot of them would have access to none of their money. Of course they could keep their money outside of the banks but that's got its own set of problems.

    After crises like this (even America's own "great recession"), people tend to prefer forms of money are more than just bits or fiat paper, such as gold and silver.

    Really? Go take a few ounces of gold bullion to McDonalds and try to buy a burger with it and let me know what happens. Furthermore whether you have gold or fiat currency does not affect whether a bank run can occur. Bank runs happened long before the gold standard was eliminated. While it's not a bad idea to have some amount of gold as an asset it doesn't solve problems like the ones facing Greece and Greek citizens right now.

    1. Re:Gold will not solve this problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You show up to a McDonalds with a single ounce of gold and I'm there, I'll make sure you leave with as much of their food as you can carry.

      Stupid claim is stupid.

    2. Re:Gold will not solve this problem by Chalnoth · · Score: 2

      Greece has had that massive bank run, to the point of closing banks and imposing capital controls. As the primary problem with exiting the Euro is that it would likely result in a massive bank run, I think they should probably default on their debt exit the Euro. The cost has already been paid. But exiting the Euro will give them the tools to recover.

  32. Idiots in the real world by clickclickdrone · · Score: 0

    This sort of garbage just proves how financially inept anyone who thinks BitCoin et al have any sort of long term future is. Sure, it appeals on a nerdy/privacy/stick it to da man level but most of us are in the real world. This is not how it works, this is not how countries work, this is not how global financial processes work.

    And whose ass did those numbers get pulled from?

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  33. Sounds a lot like the gold bugs by JoeyRox · · Score: 0

    If the success of an asset or currency is predicated on a doomsday scenario then that asset/currency is doomed itself.

    1. Re:Sounds a lot like the gold bugs by Shaitan · · Score: 0

      I know right? I mean if I came and dropped a chest full of gold on your porch you'd be complaining immediately and demanding I pay the tab for hauling that crap away!

    2. Re:Sounds a lot like the gold bugs by Canth7 · · Score: 1

      If the success of an asset or currency is predicated on a doomsday scenario then that asset/currency is doomed itself.

      A fair point, from a US perspective since we've never destroyed our currency and had to re-issue it. Lots of other countries have experienced that doomsday scenario - just ask Argentina how many times they've rebooted their peso in the last few decades. Things do blow up - it just hasn't affected your latte drinking, much and yet.

  34. The premise of the article is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would happen to the value of the Yen or the Dollar (within Greece) if they left the Euro? Almost nothing.

    So why would the Euro suddenly become worthless? All the remaining countries like Germany will happily accept it in return for goods and services.

  35. Meanwhile in the real world by JohnStock · · Score: 1

    It's like when a stereotypical virgin geek gives relationship advice.

  36. Why? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    I realize that any instance of fiat currencies looking foolish is a happy day for the goldbugs, physical and virtual; but I'm not sure I follow:

    Greece has been part of the euro zone for a while now, any remaining pre-euro currency is just a collector's item, and has no value now and no expectation of gaining value as the basis of a post-euro greek currency.

    The euro itself will presumably do some fluctuating based on whether people are more nervous about the fact that the euro zone basically can't pull together when things look vaguely bad; or more enthusiastic about the fact that a weak member of the euro zone dropped out, leaving a stronger survivor group and establishing a precedent for (relatively) orderly drumming-out of any future weaklings.

    In any case, greeks who currently have cash holdings either don't need bitcoins(if they just put the euros under their pillow they'll still be able to drive into the nearest euro zone country and spend them) or won't be helped by bitcoins(their euros are just numbers in the ledger of some deeply fucked bank that is imposing withdrawal limits or freezes, so they can't get them to hide under their pillow or to buy bitcoins).

    A 'grexit' is actually more or less the opposite of the classic 'my holdings are in the dysfunctional currency of inflationistan; but capital controls are keeping me from expatriating them or buying dollars!' problem that bitcoin might actually be useful for addressing. If Greece drops out, all the greeks holding euros still have relatively hard currency, probably superior to whatever is introduced as a local replacement. They gain no obvious advantage from shifting euros into bitcoins, unless Greece bumps up their border controls into a veritable Berlin wall to prevent physical transport of currency; but continues to ignore online activity.

    This story just seems orthogonal to bitcoins.

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?

      Tony Gallippi would like you to buy bitcoins, that's why. :-) They're going up, up, up! Act now!

    2. Re:Why? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If Greece drops out, all the greeks holding euros still have relatively hard currency, probably superior to whatever is introduced as a local replacement.

      If Greece drops out, then it will become impossible to get Euros from the bank. The banks will only disburse the new (devalued) currency. The only hard currency anyone will have is the cash that was in their wallet (or in a foreign bank). That's the way these things typically work.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Why? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Indeed; that's why I included the "don't need bitcoins" case(already have euros in hand) and the "won't be helped by bitcoins"(nominal euro holdings are frozen in a bank or similar, and are at risk; but also unavailable to buy bitcoins with.)

      I definitely suspect that somebody is going to be taking quite a bath on this; either holders of Greek state debt, or Greeks with cash in easy reach of the state, or both; but I just don't see how bitcoins outperform 'in-hand' euros, or dollars in terms of weathering the transition; while anyone who can't get their euros is probably in deep shit; but can't buy bitcoins because they can't get to their euros, so they won't be helped much by bitcoins.

      I definitely wouldn't want to have money stuck inside Greece should it exit; but barring all but the most heroic border controls, not a historical strong point of the Greek government, just walking the euros out if you have them will be relatively simple(and, if doing so is illegal, so would getting the same euros out-of-country by buying bitcoins from a non-greek, the money needs to move either way); while anyone who doesn't have them may well be stuck; but also doesn't have cash on hand to buy bitcoins.

    4. Re:Why? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      AFAICT anyone with lots of Euros in Greece already got them out of the country years ago. It's been rather obvious this was coming for a long time......

      Yeah, I can't think of any scenario where bitcoin would help Greece at all. The only thing I can see is speculators mindlessly driving up the price of bitcoins.....

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  37. Ponzi Scheme by r0kk3rz · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Bitcoin works by convincing others to buy into the game for the promise of returns, thus pushing up the price. So take any 'expert' who claims the value of bitcoin is going to boom, or "can only go up" with a bag of salt as its more likely that they are following their own interests and not yours.

  38. Not just e-money by davidwr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Commodity-backed money, such as actual precious metals or precious-metal-backed-depository-receipts (or even gold-backed bank notes) from an institution that people trust, can be functional currencies in places where the currency is unstable and local laws or customs don't prevent it.

    Heck, even in the Untied States of America, the US Constitution specifically allows states to mind gold and silver coins and declare them legal tender. In practice, this is not needed because relative to the cost of most goods and services, the US dollar is at least as stable as gold and silver, and declaring gold and silver as "legal tender" while maintaining a floating exchange rate with the US dollar would mean merchants who took both would have to re-price things in real time to prevent arbitrage-buyers from disrupting the system. However, it the US Dollar ever has runaway inflation, the option for states to declare gold and silver legal tender would make the option of having "stable" prices in gold or silver and "adjusted-by-the-minute" prices in US Dollars attractive.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  39. The Nature of Central Banks by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

    What is happening in Greece now will inevitably happen to every country who allow the central banks to provide their currency.

    The basic concept of central banking is that a country borrows it's currency from the central banks - and is required to pay back the principal + interest. However, it is mathematically impossible to pay back the principal + interest from a pool of money containing only the principal. As a result, the banks will eventually own all real property and assets (collateral) of every country that they "do business" in.

    This is where income tax comes in. Contrary to popular belief, income tax dollars do not go toward roads, schools and hospitals. Income tax (YOUR hard earned money) goes to pay the interest on the money the government borrowed from the banksters (instead of the government printing their currency debt-free) in an effort to keep the banksters from taking real-world commodities. For example, Canada lost its national railroad - Canadian National Railway - to the banksters in the 1970's. CNR is now a private corporation, and of all people, Bill Gates is a large shareholder.

    The CRA/IRS are little more than glorified collection agencies for the banksters, supported by the federal government.

    The practice of "fractional reserve banking" - that is, creating money (out of thin air) and lending it out at interest - is one of the biggest ponzi schemes ever developed; and is practiced by every commercial bank in the modern world.

    Nearly every country on the planet has been swept into this scam. The few exceptions, interestingly enough, are (alleged terrorist/axis of evil) countries such as Iran and North Korea.

    The only country that I am aware of that has rejected the central banksters and taken control of their own banking system is Iceland. Instead of getting a 'bailout' or 'stimulus package' (borrowing more money to pay the interest and delay the inevitable collapse), Iceland threw the crooked banksters in jail and disconnected from the central banking system. The rest of world really needs to follow suit.

    For further information on the central banking ponzi scheme, I strongly encourage everyone to watch Money as Debt and read The Creature from Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin.

    --
    Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
    1. Re:The Nature of Central Banks by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Note that you infuriated one bankster with mod points. And I find interesting the number of people who ignore this fact, or who are trained to ignore. The central bank of my country is still from the country, but it's been a few decades that we have traitors (trained by the banksters of course) trying to force the government to give "independence" for the central bank.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    2. Re:The Nature of Central Banks by ledow · · Score: 1

      Ah, this would be the Iceland that "had to obtain emergency funding from the International Monetary Fund and a range of European countries in November 2008". And also the Iceland whose economy is "small and subject to high volatility".

      The Iceland whose GDP is worth less than what the UK spend each year on weddings alone. The Iceland whose debt to other countries is actually more than 100% than that pittance of GDP.

      With 3 people per square kilometre and less than the population of a medium size town in the UK (or any one single London borough).

      Sorry, pal, you can make all the claims you like. The ONLY counterexample you provide is actually doing no better than anyone else, and is on a scale so small as to be statistically useless anyway.

      I'm not a banker or economist, by the way, just a mathematician.

      And when the Icelandic banks crashed, other countries had to compensate savers who had been using them as the Icelandic banks had zero actual protection for their customers at all. All that teaches you is that people WON'T invest in Icelandic banks because they just lose their money if it all goes wrong.

      Sure, there's a point at which you have to let the banks fall over to save other things, but that's true of anything - even Greece today. We're choosing to let them collapse rather than extend more and more bailouts to them. It's just a question of scale.

      An country that's got the population of Pittsburgh and the GDP less than a UK mobile phone network's entire worth is - pretty much - a nonsensical thing to extrapolate to the world economy.

    3. Re:The Nature of Central Banks by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

      "An country that's got the population of Pittsburgh... pretty much - a nonsensical thing to extrapolate to the world economy."

      I disagree. The size of the country, it's economy, or its population is irrelevant.

      What is relevant, however, is the fact that they (Iceland) recognized the fraud being perpetrated against them and did something about it.

      With respect to nearly every other country on the planet, the banksters have got them all by the balls; so to speak.

      --
      Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
    4. Re:The Nature of Central Banks by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      However, it is mathematically impossible to pay back the principal + interest from a pool of money containing only the principal.

      Not if the original pool grows. Which it does.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:The Nature of Central Banks by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

      "Not if the original pool grows. Which it does."

      Not exactly. The original pool does grow, but only due to "economic stimulus" packages - which is really just borrowing more money at interest and going further into debt. This simply slows the burst by creating a bigger bubble. The burst is still inevitable. And unfortunately, it will happen sooner or later.

      To simplify: the world's banking system is a massive fraud. Don't trust it.

      --
      Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
    6. Re:The Nature of Central Banks by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Where to start...

      What country is forced to borrow all of its currency from a central bank? Central banks aren't the source of money. If the US decides to print more money, they do that. They don't borrow it.

      Paying back principal and interest? The whole frippin' idea of a business loan is that you borrow money to generate an income stream sufficiently large to be able to (among other things) pay back the loan. The economy is not a zero-sum game.

      The reason every commercial bank in the modern world practices fractional reserve banking is that they have to make money somehow. If they have to keep all the currency they've got in a vault, they can't make money with it, and so they'd have to charge depositors for safekeeping. Moreover, it would be impossible to get a loan from a bank, since they wouldn't have any spare money. Without fractional reserve banking, we don't have banks in the modern sense, and banks have proved invaluable in running an economy.

      For example, I've got some extra money. If I deposit it in a bank, somebody else who needs capital for a business can borrow it, provided it's using fractional reserve banking. If that's outlawed, then somebody who needs capital needs to stump around looking for individuals with extra money, and convince those people to lend money. I'm not ready to evaluate possible loans for how reliable they are. I'm not in a position to watch my money go away when the business goes bust. In other words, we add a tremendous amount of friction to the process of matching investors with entrepeneurs if we ditch fractional-reserve banking.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    7. Re:The Nature of Central Banks by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

      "What country is forced to borrow all of its currency from a central bank? Central banks aren't the source of money. If the US decides to print more money, they do that. They don't borrow it."

      Nearly every country on the planet borrows it's currency - at interest - from central banks. In the United States, it is called the "Federal Reserve". It is a private central bank that has a monopoly over American currency creation. The U.S. government does not print more money if it needs it. That has not been allowed since the central banks took over America in 1913 via the Federal Reserve Act.

      Here in Canada, the situation is bad but not quite as dire as that of the USA. Unlike the FED, the Bank of Canada does not have a monopoly on currency creation. It is estimated that about 5% of all Canadian currency is printed debt free.

      The Bank of Canada (BOC) is not a government entity unto itself; it is a 'special' type of corporation set up to liason between the central banks and the Canadian government. The only member of the Federal government on the board of directors of the BOC is the deputy minister of finance, and he does not have the right to vote. The implications of this are obvious.

      If you do not believe that countries borrow money at interest from central banks instead of printing their currency debt free, then you do not understand the central banking business.

      Here is some research material to get you started:

      The Creature from Jekyll Island

      Money as Debt

      --
      Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
  40. Re:Let's Get This Off Our Chests First, Then Discu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he were listing things Bitcoin doesn't have, that would be a good addition. Do try to follow along.

  41. Those outside of Greece will have an impact by davidwr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the first country leaves the Eurozone, then it will make it easier for the next country in crisis to do the same.

    This will cause those in weaker countries to look to something other than the Euro to store their long-term savings in. Bitcoin will be one of many options, as will metals, other major world currencies, land, art, collectables, and other items that are likely to keep their "real value" in the event this person's country exits the Euro and all bank accounts are re-denominated into a weaker-than-the-Euro currency.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Those outside of Greece will have an impact by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is no such thing as a magic currency that any country can use to turn worthless promises into something of value. Well, maybe the dollar, but only if you're the U.S.

      The fact is that Greece can leave the Euro and print all the money it wants. But that money is going to be as worthless as the paper it's printed on and everyone will know it. No one is going to accept it for anything of value. And no one is going to loan them anything of value. So they'll be like Germany in the early 1920's, with piles of worthless paper money and a black-market/barter economy.

      At the end of the day, you just can't keep spending more than you take in. It's going to collapse at some point. Greece is one of the most notorious countries at doing this, and so they're the canary in the coal mine. But the same thing is going to follow for the U.S. and many other European countries if they don't find a way to balance their budgets. Eventually the credit card bill comes due and the creditors just won't loan you any more money.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Those outside of Greece will have an impact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, if you have to balance your budget anyway you don't really need the creditors.
      So the choice is between balancing your budget and keeping the money you borrowed or balancing your budget and giving back the money you borrowed.
      I can see a lot of rich people that have lent money to nations realize that it wasn't the best investment ever.

    3. Re:Those outside of Greece will have an impact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF are you even talking about? Having your savings in Euro is not the problem, a forced conversion of Euro to a new currency (e.g. Drachme) is the problem. Your savings will be worth 1/10 of their previous worth from one day to another. Which is also the reason why people in Greece get Euros in cash and transfer their money abroad (which has been stopped now). You can also convert your savings into, say, Swiss or Austrian treasury obligations. But there is no doubt that the Euro will remain strong in the long run, whether with or without Greece; it might even get stronger after a "grexit" for obvious reasons.

      Anyway, almost anything is safer than Bitcoin. I'm not saying you're wrong, though, because with an exit of Greece from the monetary union many idiots might indeed get the idea that investing into Bitcoin could somehow help them.

    4. Re:Those outside of Greece will have an impact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If not for the skimming and outright theft by government officials for the bosses who put them in office, the budget would already be balanced, a global issue, not just Greece, their problem is one of subtlety, or 'nuance' as some of you like to call it. A, if not the direct cause of all poverty is corruption. They go hand in hand, intertwined. The truth is the books are so cooked that nobody knows who owes whom. Real debts are never documented, it could be used as evidence.

    5. Re:Those outside of Greece will have an impact by Daniel+Hoffmann · · Score: 1

      That is called hyperinflation and the only reason it has NOT happened in Greece is because Greece uses the Euro. It happened to several countries in the last couple of centuries.

      For a formal explanation:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      For a funny explanation (they wipe their asses with money, literally):
      http://www.cracked.com/persona...

    6. Re:Those outside of Greece will have an impact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those in weaker countries will definitely continue to keep their savings in Euros. After all, the whole reason Greece is dropping out of the Euro is because the Euro is so strong. The only thing that will differ is that the savings will be kept at German banks. After all, the Greeks are still EU citizens, and the Greek government can't seize assets at a German bank.

      The obvious result is that Greece and the other Club Med states will lose their banking sector as well, precisely because it's controlled by an untrusted government. The drachma will be backed neither by an burgeoning economy nor by a healthy bank sector.

    7. Re:Those outside of Greece will have an impact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and no. There's nothing wrong with borrowing money, whether as an individual or a country, so long as the borrowing is not used to fund day to day expenses past any immediate crisis.
      At some future point you may want to borrow money to fund something that you can't afford to pay for outright and you cant afford the time it would take to save the money but if you have a poor credit rating then the cost of such borrowing will be much more expensive than it would have otherwise been.

      Greece's main problem is that it over borrowed rather badly, due in no small part to the cost of the borrowing being too cheap in regard to the risk since it was seen to be underwritten by the larger euro area instead of the Greek economy in and of itself.
      One can also argue, cogently, that they should never have been allowed in the euro in the first place but that's a side issue to the current crisis.

    8. Re:Those outside of Greece will have an impact by shani · · Score: 1

      At the end of the day, you just can't keep spending more than you take in. It's going to collapse at some point. Greece is one of the most notorious countries at doing this, and so they're the canary in the coal mine.

      This is actually not true. If you look at deficit as a percentage of GDP it's not too bad:

      USA: 5.8%
      UK: 5.7%
      France: 4.0%
      Greece: 3.5%
      Netherlands: 2.3%
      Canada: 1.8%
      Switzerland: 0.0%
      Germany: -0.7% (surplus!)

      What is unusual about Greece is that the GDP per capita has fallen for the past 6 years, under the fiscal policies imposed by the IMF. For comparison, the US had GDP per capita fall one year, Germany two, Holland three.

      Fundamentally Greece had some corrupt government officials who lied. Sadly the financial wonks decided to use this opportunity to impose "reforms" to the Greek economy based on neoconservative economic pseudo-science, using latent racism and repressed notions of group punishment to motivate European societies with large lending institutions. :(

    9. Re:Those outside of Greece will have an impact by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      If you look at deficit as a percentage of GDP it's not too bad:

      Might want to look at total governmental debt instead of deficit. Deficit just marks the extent to which the debt is increasing year by year.

      Or even look at current accounts deficit - the deficit ignoring interest on outstanding debt.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    10. Re:Those outside of Greece will have an impact by shani · · Score: 1

      If you look at deficit as a percentage of GDP it's not too bad:

      Might want to look at total governmental debt instead of deficit. Deficit just marks the extent to which the debt is increasing year by year.

      Or even look at current accounts deficit - the deficit ignoring interest on outstanding debt.

      The comment I was replying to was discussing spending more money than taking in, which is the definition of deficit. My point is that compared to other industrialized countries, Greece is about middle of the pack regarding its deficit, so you need to look further than this simple explanation of Greece's woes.

    11. Re:Those outside of Greece will have an impact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the end of the day, you just can't keep spending more than you take in. It's going to collapse at some point.

      I wish the US would figure this simple math problem before we end up just like Greece.

    12. Re:Those outside of Greece will have an impact by khallow · · Score: 1

      Now, let's look at public debt as percentage of GDP:

      USA: 72.5%
      UK: 90.0%
      France: 89.9%
      Greece: 161.3%
      Netherlands: 68.7%
      Canada: 84.1%
      Switzerland: 52.4%
      Germany: 79.9%

      One of these is not like the others. One can warble on about "neoconservative economic pseudo-science", but Greece fucked up badly and now it's paying for it. Meanwhile, Scandinavian countries did not, and they don't have to undergo such things.

    13. Re:Those outside of Greece will have an impact by Magius_AR · · Score: 1

      What is unusual about Greece is that the GDP per capita has fallen for the past 6 years, under the fiscal policies imposed by the IMF.

      That's one hell of an assumption -- if you're claiming their policies are the reason Greece is suffering such a fate, why didn't all the other countries that had to implement similar policies to receive loan backstops also go in the tank?

  42. Re:What an opportunity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Go on then mate, you put your money in fiat currency. Me personally I trust algorithms not politicians.

  43. Future is unclear by sjbe · · Score: 1

    It sure will be attractive compared to the new drachma.

    Considering you have no idea what currency Greece would go to post-euro that's a highly premature statement. Re-instituting the drachma might not be a great idea and might not even be practically possible. (It's not a trivial problem to switch over and it's not clear the greeks have a plan in place to do that) They could switch to the dollar, or the yen if they wanted to. In fact countries in financial crises with their currencies often do use a foreign currency instead of their own. In fact Greece could decide to use the Euro even if they weren't in the Eurozone. Not saying they will or should but they could.

    In any case I disagree that bitcoin will be an attractive alternative to anything for most Greek citizens. There are much better options for most of them for any particular use case you care to mention.

    1. Re:Future is unclear by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Problem is if it is not a currency they can print then they have really serious problems in terms of cash flow for the government to pay things like salaries. In short they have no money now and nobody is willing to lend them more, so it's either cut spending or print more cash. If it's not your own currency you can't print it.

      Of course if you are in the situation of needing to print cash then you are in a very bad place anyway, and both printing cash or cutting spending are equally as bad choices. Best thing is to not get yourself in that situation in the first place. Problem is the Greek's are as a society collectively unable to accept that nobody owes them a free lunch.

  44. Also the Euro is stable and widely accepted by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Trying to push bitcoin only shows that the author has a poor understanding and an agenda. While you could, potentially, argue bitcoin in cases where a country's currency has collapsed, or is unable to be used to buy things from other countries. Bitcoin is highly volatile, a very poor store of wealth, but it is something you can spend and transfer, in some places at least, and at present it has value.

    Well, that isn't an issue with the Euro. It is an extremely important and widely used currency, second only to the US Dollar. All Eurozone countries use it (by definition) which is quite a few major economies. As such it is also widely sought after in international currency exchanges. Euros are very easy to spend on the international scale. Many places will take them directly, and any bank will convert them.

    Also the Euro is pretty stable. When you look at it compared to other major currencies like the Dollar, Pound, and the Yen it compares very well. All fluctuate, of course, but not very quickly. So it is a good store of value, you don't have to worry about losing your money. Works long term too, as many nations with good credit will sell debt instruments in Euros.

    So there is nothing bitcoin solves here, because bitcoin is a currency and currency isn't the problem in Greece. This isn't Zimbawbe where the currency was worth nothing.

    The only way it could "help" is to move money out in the event of capital controls on Greek banks. But of course:

    1) You have to get the money out of the bank first, which a capital control can slow down.
    2) The only way it facilitates that would be being less traceable. As I said, Euros are taken everywhere, you can convert them to Dollars or anything else.
    3) Most importantly that wouldn't help the situation at all, it'd make it work. Might help an individual save money, but it would only worsen the situation.

  45. Irrelevant by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Bitcoin swings but has historically bubbled and crashed with each bubble peaking over the previous. Smooth our those peaks and valleys and you have a constant upward progression.

    Even if true that is utterly useless information as far as most greeks will be concerned. Long term trends don't matter at all when you have to buy in today to avoid a catastrophe.

    1. Re:Irrelevant by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      But it's also had only one big bubble, and hasn't been around that long. There isn't enough historical data to make any prediction for the future based on that alone.

  46. Replying to myself by davidwr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone who uses something as volatile as Bitcoin as a long-term store of value only has themselves to blame when things go south.

    For me, personally, Bitcoin's primary utility is as a medium of exchange, not as a store of value. Thanks to Bitcoin-based and similar low-friction (read: low transaction fee) means of exchange, I can buy stuff from merchants that accept BC without dealing with typical currency-conversion fees. If I'm a seller, I can sell without dealing with the typical merchant fees associated with credit cards. Then again, I have the advantage that my nation uses a currency that is, for the time being at least, considered one of the world's major stable currencies.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re: Replying to myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin is supposed to be a medium of exchange. As such, volatile exchange rates hurt it's credibility. The best thing that could happen is for the 'value' of a bitcoin in euros or usd to not change at all for months.

    2. Re:Replying to myself by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Long-term, Bitcoin has no future in such exchanges. If I want to pay somebody in another country in Bitcoin, I need to find an exchange and acquire some, then send them to the other person, who likely will convert the Bitcoin into his or her local currency. That's three Bitcoin transfers, and each one takes a good many computrons to execute. If I want to do that with dollars, I can transfer dollars out of my account to the other person's account, and get them exchanged to the other person's local currency at some point. That's one transfer and one currency conversion, instead of three transfers and two conversions, and there's no need for expensive computations to do these.

      In other words, the real cost of Bitcoin transfer is significantly higher than the real cost of simply transferring dollars. If it's cheaper with Bitcoin, it means that the banks are making extra money on international money transfers and currency conversion. If Bitcoin cuts into their profits enough, they can undercut Bitcoin by simply providing more efficient service to their customers.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  47. It would give them control of monetary policy by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Part of the issue in the Eurozone is that countries have control of fiscal policy, as in how money is spent and taxes collected, but not monetary policy, as in how much money is supplied and to where.

    While monetary policy doesn't let you magic your way out of any situation (see Zimbawbe for an example) it can be useful. Have a currency that is weak or strong isn't inherently good and bad, but rather useful in different ways. So one country might wish to have a weaker currency, another a stronger one. Also it can allow for things such as higher inflation, which can be a problem, but can also be useful in some situations.

    It wouldn't solve Greece's problem, to be sure, but there are ways it could potentially help.

  48. Re:What an opportunity! by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You should trust trustworthy algorithms, not just all algorithms. Bitcoin in particular is a pyramid scheme algorithm.

  49. Greece has one huge industry: Tourism by davidwr · · Score: 1

    The history of Greece as one of the cradles of "Western civilization" and as destination for those interested in religious history makes it a natural market for tourists.

    Whether Greece makes a "little" money on tourism or a "lot" of money on tourism is a function of how hospitable it is to visitors. If the country as a whole makes it a priority to be very nice and welcoming to foreigners, they stand to reap a lot more in tourist spending than if they take tourism for granted or, worse, go out of their way to make tourists feel unwelcome.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Greece has one huge industry: Tourism by hodet · · Score: 2

      As someone who has been to Greece I can say that they were very pleasant hosts and a wonderful people. I am not only talking about the ones working in the tourism industry. Regular citizens in general were very welcoming.

  50. Conjuring gold and silver out of thin air by davidwr · · Score: 1

    you can't conjure extra gold and silver out of thin air

    There are two relatively "easy" ways to conjure gold and silver "out of thin air".

    1) Steal it. The difficulty is comparable to stealing currency or base-metal coins.

    2) Counterfeit it. If your country uses precious-metal coins, make counterfeits that contain slightly less precious metal. If it doesn't use coins, make bars or whatever that are adulterated so when you spend them, you instantly make a small profit on the adulteration (less the cost of counterfeiting). Of course you'll only be able to spend them at places that don't have the equipment to detect a slightly-adulterated bar or high-quality-fake coins, but that's part of the cost of doing business.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  51. Re:What an opportunity! by kurkosdr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Using Bitcoin to trade doesn't make any more sense than using Google or Apple stocks to trade (with the difference that Google and Apple stocks fluctuate less rapidly in value). Oh, and the state-controlled water companies and the mostly state-controlled electricity company of Greece () accept payment only in Euros. And the special tax on all fuels (heating diesel, vehicle diesel, gasoline, LPG and CNG), which is seperate from VAT, is paid in Euro only, so gas stations have to charge in Euro. Even in if everyone else decides to sell you stuff Bitcoin, you still have to use Euros to live. BTW, if a country's currency become worthless (like a new Drachma will be), people typically use US dollars (see Zimbabwe), not obscure libertarian cryptocurrencies. Sorry.

  52. Re:What an opportunity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL - Exactly! :)

  53. Currency vs. store of value by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Bare-metal gold is a very inconvenient currency, but it is reasonably good as a long-term store of value.

    Counterfeit-resistant gold-backed paper money or counterfeit-resistant gold coins - where there is no doubt of the amount of gold in the coin - are much more convenient but I don't see many countries making reasonably-sized gold coins or currencies that, on any given day, have a market value in the $0.10-$20 range that most people need when they go buy groceries.

    As a long-term (20+ years) store of value, most people should have a mix of asset types including at least a few weeks of easily-accessible spending money and several months of "I can get to it within a few days" spending money. In a time of crisis, the "few weeks of spending money" is probably going to be the actual national currency or coin or it will be a commodity that is easily carried in your pocket and bartered, such as unopened packs of cigarettes in the battlefields of WWII.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  54. Re:What an opportunity! by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

    Even in if everyone else decides to sell you stuff Bitcoin = Even if everyone else decides to sell you stuff in Bitcoin

  55. A retirement age of 57 is okay ... by davidwr · · Score: 1

    ... as long as the life expectancy of 57-year-olds is short enough that it doesn't bankrupt the economy.

    They key for a "generational-tax" or "government-paid" retirement system is that the money coming into the system is at least as much as the money going out, at least for the long haul. If 57-year-olds die so quickly that the working population can easily meet all of their retirement expenses, then retiring at 57 isn't an issue.

    Wait, this just in: The life expectancy of a 57 year old in Greece is a lot longer than 1 year, so long, in fact, that allowing healthy people to retire and draw a pension at 57 is not economically feasible.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  56. Re:What an opportunity! by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To replace one deflationary currency they can't print (Euro) for another (Bitcoin). No my dear friend. It's fiat currency they need right now.

    It's a completely arbitrary distinction in many ways. Forget the money: the problem is about stuff (goods, services, etc). The Greek government has been borrowing so that its people can have more stuff, and at this point It's not even about paying what they've borrowed so far, there's a substantial ongoing deficit that they need to deal with. As such, the people are poorer than they thought, and they're going to have to cope with it somehow. They can do that by accepting the poverty and choosing austerity: cutting benefits, raising taxes. Or they can respond to that with reforms in the labor market and other markets (working harder/smarter).

    All you get by replacing the currency and then paying people in the new currency that's worth less is austerity by stealth, with a side of chaos and disruption. Which is what the leftists in charge of Greece will pick, since they ideologically reject the reforms and can blame evil outside influences for the chaos and disruption.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  57. Re:What an opportunity! by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

    Fiat currency is based on faith. I'm pretty sure any paper money produced by Greece right now would garner no faith from anyone. It wouldn't be worth the paper it was printed on.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  58. My advice: Distrust Messiahs by christose · · Score: 1

    We heard the same during the Cyprus banking crisis.

    At the time, a startup named Neo & Bee with a certain Mr. Danny Brewster as CEO, touted itself more or less the first bitcoin bank.

    Anyway, turns out the guy left the country in a hurry amidst allegations of bitcoin fraud, never to be seen or heard of from again. All that's left is empty buildings with the Neo & Bee's logo outside, and (if you trust the media), unpaid advertising companies and unpaid employees.

    So I say beware of people proclaiming they have magical solutions.
    Trust them at your own peril...

  59. Re:Greek Financial Crisis opportunity for ArcadeMa by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Strange definition of "free" you have there. It seems like they want some personal data and for me to labour away at some game in exchange for Bitcoins. Not what I'd call free.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  60. Athens has a printing press. by monkeyxpress · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interestingly, the National Bank of Greece is one of the eurozone institutions that has the facilities to print Euro bank notes.

    Since November they have printed more than 13 billion euros of bank notes (against ELA funds) which Greeks are now storing under their mattresses.

    One wonders what sorts of contingency the EU has for this. It would be the ultimate middle finger to the EU if Syriza decided to solve the ECB imposed liquidity crunch by literally firing up the printing presses, yet a uniquely convenient thing to do when stuck in a currency union. Normally, the ECB could punish them by cutting of access to the TARGET2 settlement system, but this is basically already the situation now with the ELA funds running dry and capital controls in place.

    What a circus this could become.

    1. Re:Athens has a printing press. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For real? I don't think they would dare do something like printing out 300 billions and sending them to creditors in big bales. Would be awesome if they actually did it, and added "for the lulz" on the 100 bill wrapper.

    2. Re:Athens has a printing press. by monkeyxpress · · Score: 1

      For real? I don't think they would dare do something like printing out 300 billions and sending them to creditors in big bales. Would be awesome if they actually did it, and added "for the lulz" on the 100 bill wrapper.

      They definitely have the equipment, but as to what arrangements the ECB has to control consumables etc. I don't know. I doubt they would print on such a grand scale though, but printing enough bills to keep the ATM machines going so they can continue to defy the EU through summer? Why not? Once they've defaulted it is not like they have some kind of precedent to uphold. For all we know they may have stocked up a bit over the last few months in anticipation of the ECB finally turning of the taps. If the ECB won't credit their ELA account and they have the paper it is only themselves holding things back.

      It would be an interesting play if they could pull it off. Let the painful pictures of greek pensioners queueing for the ATMs hit the TV screens for a couple more days, then announce they are going to save the people from this terrible fate by defying the evil EU. What does the EU do then? Boots on the ground in Athens? It really throws the ball back into their court.

      Still this is total speculation on my part. I'm sure the reality will be much more ridiculous.

    3. Re:Athens has a printing press. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They might have presses, they do not have permission to use then and i suspect it's a client-server scheme (or peer-to-peer) where if greece's press doesn't get the information it can not print currency.

    4. Re:Athens has a printing press. by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      No, I think the reaction would be much more subdued. All Euro notes with Greece's 'X' on it will be considered counterfeit money, and people holding those notes will be reimbursed. If Greece starts to really cheat and create notes with other countries initials on it, then the story changes. They could just as well print dollars at that time. The reaction would be much the same.

    5. Re:Athens has a printing press. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's essentially an act of war. Of course, the Ukraine invasion has shown that Europe won't react military, but expect sanctions. Shipping is 5% of the Greek economy. Barring Greek ships from European harbors would instantly cause major unhappiness. Tourism is another big sector that's almost as easily sanctioned, and this would also generate a lot of angry unemployed Greeks.

      So then Greece has a lot of printed Euro's. Where are they going to spend them? North Korea? Syria? Greece is only 1% of the EU economy, which country would risk access to EU markets by accepting illegal Greek Euros ?

    6. Re:Athens has a printing press. by monkeyxpress · · Score: 2

      Perhaps, but making Greek euro notes non-legal tender would be a practical expulsion of the country from the eurozone, which may actually be what Syriza wants them to do. Draining 100 billion euros out of the ELA mechanism so that Greek retail deposits are secured, defaulting on the IMF loan repayments, and framing things so that Greece is the one getting kicked out by a nasty democracy hating EU would be a better way to exit than leaving in a huff. It would also solve Syriza's problem of not having a popular mandate to grexit, and rather oddly mean they wouldn't even have to deal with the practicalities of introducing their own currency - fixing the paper currency mess would be the EU's problem.

      I see Greece is now challenging the ECB's legal right to cut of the ELA funding, and the ECB is saying the ATMs will run out of money within 5days. The issue of hard currency is definitely becoming the pressure point. Crazy times.

    7. Re:Athens has a printing press. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, but even if they print all the money they want they still must serialize the notes. Serialized notes will be not impossible to decline in circulation. I am pretty sure that Greece is not crazy enough to use serial numbers not allotted to them, which would essentially be counterfeit currency even if it is printed on legitimate printing presses using all the same materials.

  61. Re:Greek Financial Crisis opportunity for ArcadeMa by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    WTF is that? How do you make money off that? Why would anyone give away free bitcoins? Nothing is free, after all.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  62. No good options by sjbe · · Score: 1

    In short they have no money now and nobody is willing to lend them more, so it's either cut spending or print more cash.

    The problem isn't that they have no money now. They do. They have lots of Euros that have already been lent to them. The problem is that they owe much of it to creditors. They have the option (not a good one) of defaulting and keeping what cash they do have. Then they are de-facto still using the Euro even if they aren't in the Eurozone. It's going to be ugly if it comes to that though.

    Of course as you very rightly point out, nobody will be willing to lend them more at that point so they are not in a good place no matter what they do going forward.

  63. Why can Greece destroy the global economy? by plopez · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I keep asking this question and no one seems to have a good answer. How can an economy as small as Greece's; or for that matter Italy's and Spain's; send global markets and economies as big as Germany and the US into a tailspin? There is somethings very wrong with our financial and economic policies. All this tight binding of economies and fifnacial systems seems to be a recipe for disaster.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:Why can Greece destroy the global economy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're confusing things. Greece cannot cause a financial disaster to any other country, let alone the whole world, because its economy is fairly small. An exit of Greece from the Euro zone will have catastrophic consequences within Greece, but probably not affect the remaining Euro zone in any substantial way. Just compare the numbers. The same can be said for Portugal, it has a relatively small economy in comparison to the rest of Europe. That's also the reason why the other EU countries were able to help Greece and Portugal with massive credits.

      Italy and Spain are much larger economies and much more vital to the EU as a whole. If Italy were as bad off as Greece, for example, there wouldn't be much that the rest of Europe could do to stabilize it.

    2. Re:Why can Greece destroy the global economy? by plopez · · Score: 1

      Then why do I sense hysteria? A quick google gives m http://www.worldfinancialwatch...

      Or this one:

      http://economywatch.nbcnews.co...

      It would seems from articles like this the situation is dire. Or why the hysteria?

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re:Why can Greece destroy the global economy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had a tax haven. Though small, their financial system handled A LOT of money. It was a very ... dynamic situation.

    4. Re:Why can Greece destroy the global economy? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      An exit of Greece from the Euro zone will have catastrophic consequences within Greece

      Backwards. Staying on the Euro has done nothing but keep Greece in a worse state than the Great Depression while selling off their national assets. The costs of leaving the Eurozone are insignificant in comparison.

      The benefits are Greece will be free to set its own exchange rates, making the country cheap for both tourists to visit and for exports to be, well, exported.

    5. Re: Why can Greece destroy the global economy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. If Greece leaves the Eurozone, the EU will punish the country severely, to set an example for would-be rebels. There will be an embargo, and sanctions leveled at all branches of Greek economy. EU citizens will be forbidden to visit Greece, and all Greek citizens living in the EU will be arrested and forcefully repatriated, and their assets confiscated. All marriages between Greek citizens and EU citizens of different national origin will be declared null and any offspring shall be rendered wards of the EU. Unlike mongrel nations like the US, we Europeans have unity of thought and a common purpose. We obey authority, as represented by the European Commission. Europe! Great Europe! Your will is our own!

  64. Pump and dump by linuxguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not long ago, value of Bitcoin was around $1200. Now it is around $250.

    Anyone buying Bitcoin for stability is too stupid. Anyone suggesting that the value of Bitcoin is about to rise to $600 or $1200 is attempting to pump the price in order to dump their holdings.

  65. This makes no sense. by edibobb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If a Greek citizen can buy a bitcoin, the same person can buy Euros, Dollars, or stock index funds, all of which are more stable. The author of this must be either financially ignorant or hyping bitcoins.

  66. Re:Greek Financial Crisis opportunity for ArcadeMa by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Personal data = use a generic Hotmail/GMail account.
    Labour away = typing a captcha.

  67. Re:Greek Financial Crisis opportunity for ArcadeMa by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    These websites show ads and pay their users some of that ads money in crypto-currencies.

    The links in my signature are used to get referrals for my account, I get a bonus depending on what my referrals get for themselves.

  68. Re:Greek Financial Crisis opportunity for ArcadeMa by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    It looks dangerous lol

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  69. I thought they only did cars? by periklisv · · Score: 2

    I'm all over FIAT's website but can't find any reference to currencies, I think I'll ask my local car dealer

  70. Re:Let's Get This Off Our Chests First, Then Discu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You covered all possibilities. This thread is now ready to be closed for comments.

  71. This post right here tells you what you need by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Follow shady looking links for "free" money!

    That right there succinctly shows the mentality of those who support Bitcoin better than anything else.

    1. Re:This post right here tells you what you need by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry for the shortened links but Slashdot has a very low character limit for signatures.

  72. It's also hilarious by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    It is just a way of trying to shirk his responsibility. Push it off on to the voters and then wring your hands as though there was nothing to be done. He knows, even if there was time, the voters would say no.

  73. Yeah? How hospitable were Tunisians? by denzacar · · Score: 2

    Whether Greece makes a "little" money on tourism or a "lot" of money on tourism is a function of how hospitable it is to visitors. If the country as a whole makes it a priority to be very nice and welcoming to foreigners, they stand to reap a lot more in tourist spending than if they take tourism for granted or, worse, go out of their way to make tourists feel unwelcome.

    You can make the country hospitable up the wazoo, all it takes is ONE dickhead with an AK to fuck it all up.
    Or one missing child.
    Or a drowned one.
    Or a rainy season.
    Or a global economic crisis.
    Or simply a fashion trend.

    Tourism is a nice bonus and a source of foreign currency, but you can't run a country on tertiary sector alone - unless you are willing to be permanently in debt or permanently poor OR to end up exactly where Greece is now. Both poor and in debt.
    Cause there is hardly a more literal way of signing off one's own economic security on "hope and prayer" than resting it on good graces of fickle foreigners bored with their everyday existence back home.

    On top of it, to a small country, tourism is toxic.
    It artificially raises the property value to unrealistic levels, prices skyrocket and it overflows the local services with people who don't pay for those services.
    And you can't just tax them cause you don't want to scare them off or simply cause you can't properly charge for things like an increased burden on the environment or water supply.
    Or police - which will inevitably become corrupt first time that either local or governmental coffers go empty and they either get told to "skin" the foreigners or to let them slide.
    And corruption is again something that spreads across the entire society.

    On top of that, it creates conditions where country's youth will spend their most productive years SERVING instead of studying.
    And since the prices are up, when they age out of serving drinks to fat tourists, they won't have a home of their own, they won't have an education - so they end up unemployed.

    Which is where Greece was going with their long term unemployment rising (with youth unemployment always staying lower while following a more jagged, seasonal, curve) until the introduction of the Euro brought it down - through heavy borrowing which provided money for make-work jobs.
    People who were unemployed for decades got jobs. Yay!
    Just before the shit hit the fan they were running the lowest long term unemployment in last two decades, while the wages kept going up.

    As the debt kept climbing up as well.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  74. Philip K Dick by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    "Do Electronic Carpetbaggers Dream of Sheep (to Fleece)?"

  75. have about $1000 lying around at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have industrial and decorative uses and a widespread base of people willing to own them. In the absence of large-scale deep-space asteroid mining technology flooding the market with excess supplies, they're going to remain fairly valuable.

    Define "valuable", because in the last ten years the price has gone from US$400, up to over US$1800, and currently sits at about $1200:

    * http://www.nasdaq.com/markets/gold.aspx?timeframe=10y

    Even with inflation, I think most currencies of OECD countries have less turmoil than that.

    While it's easy to ridicule some of the more fringe elements of "prepping", it is prudent to have the equivalent of $1000 in cash at your domicile, and about $200 in your wallet on top of that. During the giant black out of 2003 a lot of people were caught off guard when their cards wouldn't work because of lack of power. In 2012 Royal Bank of Scotland had huge issues with their system as well. So is your credit/debit card being locked because of the banks' internal fraud monitoring flagging it.

    Having some paper lying about in an envelope is relatively cheap 'insurance' for these types of situations. And you're more likely to be able to exchange the paper for goods compared to shiny metals. It's also less likely to fluctuate as much (at least it's "internal" purchasing power).

  76. Re:What an opportunity! by ExekielS · · Score: 2

    If I had modpoints I'd give you all of them. I've been screaming this for years but for some reason people are obsessed with horrible, ineffective, dangerous deflationary currencies.

    --
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
  77. Re:What an opportunity! by ExekielS · · Score: 1

    The historical evidence shows that Austerity causes demand contraction and often demand spiral, it has never in global history solved a budget crisis. The Euro eliminated currency barriers to unequal trade relationships which substantially hurt the Greece economy. Debts on a national level will only rise as long as there is demand for that debt and confidence in it, or banks out to make money by selling people shit and betting against it.

    --
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
  78. Re:Let's Get This Off Our Chests First, Then Discu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There isn't really anything else to discuss.

  79. Re:What an opportunity! by bobbutts · · Score: 1
    This comment wasn't insightful in 2009 let alone 2015. While it's certainly possible that the end result could be the same for investors, the idea that it's a pyramid scheme has been thoroughly debunked.

    It's a giant ponzi scheme:
    In a Ponzi Scheme, the founders persuade investors that they'll profit. Bitcoin does not make such a guarantee. There is no central entity, just individuals building an economy.

    A Ponzi scheme is a zero sum game. In a ponzi scheme, early adopters can only profit at the expense of late adopters, and the late adopters always lose. Bitcoin can have a win-win outcome. Earlier adopters profit from the rise in value as Bitcoin becomes better understood and in turn demanded by the public at large. All adopters benefit from the usefulness of a reliable and widely-accepted decentralized peer-to-peer currency.

    It is also important to note that Satoshi Nakamoto, creator of bitcoin, has never spent a bitcoin (other than giving them away when they were worthless) which we can verify by checking the blockchain.

  80. Re:What an opportunity! by Tyrannosaur · · Score: 4, Funny

    You should trust trustworthy algorithms, not just all algorithms. Bitcoin in particular is a pyramid scheme algorithm.

    Yes- but you can trust it to be a pyramid scheme algorithm.

  81. It wont fly in Greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greek people are set in their ways. Unfortunately many problems in Greece are caused by it's own Government not going after tax evaders. The International Monetary Fund and Greece’s other creditors have argued for years that the country’s debt crisis could be largely resolved if the government just cracked down on tax evasion. Changing Currency? Nah not in Greece. You don't want your currency mixed up in this unless you can afford to take a loss. Greeks are so set in their ways and the Government knows it. The Government also knows to mess with it's citizens you better know what you are doing or you could have mass riots.

    If you need a good base to set up Bitcoins then consider setting it up in Puerto Rico. People abused for years. Many very poor but ready/eager for change. Many want a hand up instead of a hand out. Yes it's poor but think of the possibilities. Start from scratch.

  82. Re:Let's Get This Off Our Chests First, Then Discu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah... researching the stories of MtGox and Silk Road alone should be enough to keep most sane people from touching Bitcoin with a 50 meter pole.

  83. That's a stupid idea by whitroth · · Score: 0

    As another commenter put it, trading one currency they can't control with another? And somebody decides to use some large clusters, or large cloud, to generate money and devalue it, or another what-was-it that just collapsed, with a hundred million or so Bitcoin money *missing"?

    Fiat money that is *completely* under the control of the elected government seems to work for most nations.

                mark "oh, and how many fiat USD is that Bitcoin worth?"

  84. Re:What an opportunity! by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2

    The historical evidence shows that Austerity causes demand contraction and often demand spiral, it has never in global history solved a budget crisis.

    Austerity does cause demand contraction, but Greece is going to have to deal with it one way or another: there's no resources available for everyone to retire on a nice fat pension at age 55 anymore. It doesn't matter whether that comes out as a cut in euro-denominated pensions, or if that happens when people get drachma-denominated pensions: Greeks reliant on government funds must rely on less, because they're spending more than they take in, and it's pretty clear that lending money to Greece is less like lending and more like donating.

    Now put a truckload of economic disruption on top of that mess.

    The real way out for Greece was always securing a modicum of debt forgiveness and debt forbearance, plus enacting some economic reforms. The Greek economy is well-known as a sclerotic, over-regulated disaster area where you need to bribe corrupt bureaucrats to do anything and small-time rent-seeking plutocrats effectively own not just businesses but the right to operate important sectors of the economy. And the reforms were even going okay for a short while - real economic growth! - but the economic reforms proved unpopular with the leftists, and so this is what we get instead.

    Glad it's not my country going through this.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  85. Re:Let's Get This Off Our Chests First, Then Discu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's because it doesn't have much stability.

  86. Re:What an opportunity! by fustakrakich · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Such nonsense. Austerity is not 'reform'. It is larceny.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  87. Capital Controls by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Using Bitcoin to trade doesn't make any more sense than using Google or Apple stocks to trade

    Actually it might make sense. The problem is that there are government capital controls on all the standard financial channels to get money out of the Greek banks. While BitCoin is terrible as a store of value it excels at being easy to transfer whether or not a government says that you can. If there is some mechanism to get your Greek bank balance converted into BitCoins then you can transfer these to a foreign exchange and convert them back to another currency - or even back into Euros but outside Greece.

  88. Jesus H FUCK! by Chas · · Score: 0

    Yet another "Situation X makes the Bitcoin Scam look good!" article!

    Bitcoin is a goddamn money pit. Sure, you can invest, and you can follow it and get glowing feels from a website telling you what your investment is worth.

    Then, try to cash out... I dare you! I double dog dare you!

    OOPS! NO MONEY FOR YOU!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  89. Re:What an opportunity! by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2

    Bitcoin is not actually deflationary. Its supply grows constantly until it eventually stabilises. The fact that Bitcoin prices have fallen a lot is more because lots of new people have discovered the project and decided they want some, but that effect will eventually peter out as Bitcoin becomes boring and everyone finalises their opinions of it.

    Greece doesn't need fiat currency. What Greece needs is hard money – like the Euro (which is hard-ish, though not as hard as Bitcoin). This is because the Greek government is notoriously corrupt and the fact that they couldn't just print the pensions of their civil servants was one of the few things creating pressure to reform, and preventing outright pillaging of the savings of Greeks who do actually work in the private sector. Seeing Greece as one monolithic entity isn't right: there are different factions, not all of whom want the government to suddenly be able to spend whatever it wants. Hence the Greek people apparently voting for both keeping the Euro and not enacting any spending cutbacks, a contradictory position.

    Ultimately Greece is going to get a lot poorer, no matter what. In many ways it's practically a third world country, one that was simply kept afloat by huge injections of foreign cash. But it never really stopped being third world in the way that it was run.

    Bitcoin could, theoretically, benefit some Greek people now in the heat of the crisis because the Greek government wouldn't be able to impose capital controls on it. Thus preventing the outright theft of whatever little cash Greek's have left in the bank (sorry, I mean, solidarity tax/haircut/pick euphemism of choice). It is no magical cure for Greece's problems but it could tip the balance away from a government that discovered it was paying salaries and pensions for entirely non-existent departments, and towards people who are just trying to make a living.

  90. Greek are after the golden fleece, not bitcoins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Greek Financial Crisis Is an Opportunity For Bitcoin

    Bovine manure. The greek who still have money to preserve are buying and hoarding gold and only gold, more specifically the british 1 pound coins (weights app.7,8 gramms and has 22 carats = 916/1000 purity).

    Meanwhile, bitcoin is the fools' gold and the fraudsters' gold mine.

  91. Re:Let's Get This Off Our Chests First, Then Discu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He forgot "deflation".

  92. Re:Athen has printing press. DE/IT has Eurofighter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > One wonders what sorts of contingency the EU has for this. It would be the ultimate middle finger to the EU if Syriza decided to solve the ECB imposed liquidity crunch by literally firing up the printing presses.

    Germany would order and assist Italy to militarily occupy Greece overnight, just like they did during WW2. The greek's fake Euro printing presses would be bombed to cinders by Eurofighters and any remains crushed under tracks by Leopard2 battle tanks.

    Greece is a failed country and they should be partitioned. The mainland best goes to Italy (the Peloponessos used to belong to the Venetian Republic's colonial sphere for centuries, anyhow) and the Aegean islands should be sold to Turkey for top dollar to regain money to pay the lenders.

  93. Re:What an opportunity! by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    Greece is getting poorer and the debt is becoming unpayable. If they lower salaries to become more "competitive" in an open market with free circulation of people all it means is people will move to work elsewhere. And make the pension system even less viable.

  94. Disingenious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the Euro is "unstable" because most economists think a grexit will have some, but minor consequences on the other countries. .. oh, and "other currencies" are "unstable" too. .. but bitcoin which will apparently rise 3x in value during the next weeks, is not "unstable".

    Yay for logic!

  95. I don't understand high finance :( by nickweller · · Score: 1

    A month a go some businessman called Tony owed me $300k. Then I had a meeting with one of his 'advisors'. He offered to loan me $900k, deducted the $300k and now I owe him $600k - it's inexplicable !

  96. Re:What an opportunity! by khallow · · Score: 1

    The historical evidence shows that Austerity causes demand contraction and often demand spiral, it has never in global history solved a budget crisis.

    That's like claiming emergency rooms are responsible for vehicular deaths just because so many people die there. No one goes through a crash bout of austerity because they're doing well just as no one goes to an emergency room unless they have substantial problems.

    The Euro eliminated currency barriers to unequal trade relationships which substantially hurt the Greece economy.

    In other words, Greece fucked around for a couple of decades rather than deal with the above problem. Now they're paying the consequences.

    The time to implement austerity and similar measures would have been two decades ago. It's not like the "unequal trade relationship" showed up yesterday.

    And austerity does work. The Scandinavian countries successfully practice austerity right now. When you control spending over generations rather than only when your creditors force you to, you can have a much better society.

    Debts on a national level will only rise as long as there is demand for that debt and confidence in it, or banks out to make money by selling people shit and betting against it.

    It's worth noting here that Greece lied about its financial health for a time (and may still be lying, not like I care). So some of that debt was picked up under false pretenses.

  97. Re:What an opportunity! by sexconker · · Score: 1

    A Ponzi scheme is a zero sum game.

    All economies are zero sum.
    The whole Universe is zero sum.

  98. I misread that as geek! by antdude · · Score: 1

    "Geek Financial Crisis Is an Opportunity For Bitcoin" :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  99. Re:What an opportunity! by oztiks · · Score: 2

    Not being able to print Euros may of called for the collapse of Greece but under the Drachma Greece was already broken. Goldman Sachs committed fraud/trickery to get Greece into the EU in the first place. Therefore this has nothing to do with printing money or not printing money it has to do with "the real economy".

    Printing money only camouflages the damage for a later day which is what they'll do to bail out Deutsche Bank to stave off an 09 type collapse this time around. Because at the end of the day someone somewhere will print money somehow to solve the problem.

    Fiat has always resulted in these types of issues because they create debt based economies dictated by central banks. This is the very problem. One day people will see through the lie and all hell will break loose. This is enviable.

    A gold standard may not be feasible but it is practical. Bitcoin has the same practicality but the question is, is it feasible? A tip, look into the actual mining process, learn about the sub types of bitcoin, then you'll see its value.

  100. Bitcoin "came crashing down"? by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    "The currency is currently worth $250. ..... which began the year at less than $20 and peaked at ten times that by early April – before it all came crashing down." So it started 2013 at less than $20 and went up ten times. That would put it around $200. Now it is $250, and you call that "crashing down"?

  101. Re: Athen has printing press. DE/IT has Eurofighte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well said. Sieg heil!

  102. Re:What an opportunity! by ExekielS · · Score: 1

    Bitcoin is deflationary in the long term. It produces coins at a constant rate that declines over time and when it reaches a specific number of coins no more will be generated. It was designed to be and structured to be deflationary, the point of finality being in a couple decades. Any inflation within bitcoin is temporary and fleeting. Any good currency normally has inflation at 2-5% annually to encourage spending of currency, discourage hoarding, and make debts less valuable over time to prevent a buildup of crippling debt within economic sectors. Bitcoin's gradual increase in price over time is part of that deflation, and what makes it an investment product like gold. Unless production is tied to demand for the currency, you have a deflationary currency. Austerity has *always* hurt more than it helps, as causing demand crisis/spiral lowers gov't revenues substantially and the increased poverty puts more pressure on it. The Euro eliminated currency market barriers to trade deficits (in order to import more than you export with fair currency markets between countries without prices growing exponentially on imports is to have a negative import like investment, similar to the US), and Germany capitalized on this with enormous trade imbalances that helped create and expand poverty in Greece. Yes the country was corrupt and deep in debt beforehand, yes it had made a great many mistakes, but you don't understand currency, bitcoin, or the effects of deflation.

    --
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
  103. They can not do as you did in Argentina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the Euro is not "THEIR" currency to do with as they please. And the drachma no longer exists at all, so there's no parity as you had with your peso.
    The thing is, if Greece exits the EURO, then all bets are off, because there are a few other countries would jump the Euro shortly after, and then the Euro is worthless as shit. Which would be GREAT for the USA, since the USA has shown EXTREME animosity to any country attempting to undermine the petrodollar, and eliminating the Euro as a competitor is a brilliant move.
    So, follow the money. In whose interest is it for Greece to exit the Euro? Answer: the USA.
    So that's what will happen ...

    Just be patient.

  104. Re:What an opportunity! by adhdengineer · · Score: 1

    Balls. What is larceny is taking my taxes to subsidize other peoples lifestyle choices. For example, here in the UK we're having "austerity". I use the quotation marks because the cuts so far have been more in the "not increasing spending" column rather than "spending less". One of the things they did actually cut was housing benefit to those who have a house that is bigger than they need. So if you were on housing benefit and you had two kids each with their own bedroom and then the kids move out and get a place of your own, you'd get the benefit cut since you didnt need a bigger house. Those that opposed this dubbed it "The Bedroom Tax" as though the government were charging people money rather than not paying people money that they did not need.

  105. Re:What an opportunity! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Earlier adopters profit from the rise in value as Bitcoin becomes better understood and in turn demanded by the public at large.

    So it's a pyramid scheme.

    All adopters benefit from the usefulness of a reliable and widely-accepted decentralized peer-to-peer currency.

    Right, so they benefit but not in a way that actually makes them any money, they're basically unpaid marketers who draw in more mug punters.

    It's a pyramid scheme.

    Satoshi Nakamoto, creator of bitcoin, has never spent a bitcoin

    He may be a selfless humanitarian, who cares? I'm sure other early adopters have made money off this scam.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  106. Re:What an opportunity! by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Yes, we are familiar with your 'vacation' house story. Just stop allowing rich people and your politicians to abuse the system. Stop the rest of the skimming at the top, and you'll come out alright. And just demand a raise if your taxes are too damned high, instead of complaining about people in need. The thing is, you are still under the Thatcher/Reagan influence, and it clouds your judgement.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  107. Bitcoin won't help by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    Greece has run for the last 200 years by borrowing large sums of money and defaulting on the debt, then devaluing the local currency.

    The national religion is tax evasion. (One example: Those bits of rusty metal you see sticking out of the roof of almost every greek house? That's because you don't pay property tax on an unfinished building, so the buildings are never quite finished.)

    The mistake they made was joining the Euro via an outrageous act of fraud (the EU and banks looked the other way for that one) and expecting to keep going like they'd done in the past. Unlike USA states which may get federal top-up funding, individual EU countries are expected to run their own financial policies and keep the books balanced.

    They'd be just as fucked now if they'd decided to use the US$ as their currency. The greek people have been relying on a constant influx of foreign money to allow people to retire at 50 (or younger), whilst young greeks have been leaving in droves (no income tax base to pay those pensions) and those left have been systematically defrauding the taxman whilst politicians enriched themselves too.

    Short of unilaterally declaring that pensionable age is now 68 and anyone younger than that has to go back to work, along with reforming the tax system and going hard against political and civil service corruption, anything that greece does to get more money is simply staving off the inevitable.

  108. Re:What an opportunity! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Economies are not zero sum. Since it is possible to take some resources and make something of greater value out of it, it's possible to increase the total value in the economy.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  109. Re:What an opportunity! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Austerity, in the form of reducing government spending and increasing taxes, reduces the stimulation of the economy. If the economy is going good, this is an excellent time to do it and cut national debt, but if it isn't doing well an austerity regime will hurt the economy, so there's more of a demand for government services and less income to tax, and so sticking to austerity will put the economy into something of a death spiral. It just plain doesn't work.

    Devaluing currency works much better. It lets the economy function naturally. It automatically raises the cost of imports and lowers the cost of exports, helping balance trade. It allows the government to spend money on those who need it. The money will be worth less, but it will be worth something. Nobody gets arbitrarily screwed.

    Think of it as the economic version of Daylight Saving Time. Asking individual businesses and government agencies to change their hours in the summer would create chaos, but just shifting the time zone has the same effect fairly smoothly.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  110. Re: What an opportunity! by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    This article disagrees with you that the Scandinavian countries practice austerity. http://www.counterpunch.org/20...

  111. Re: What an opportunity! by khallow · · Score: 1

    So what? Expecting idiots to agree with me would be like expecting it to rain only on Tuesdays. I see, for example, that the author completely ignores the most important factor in why these countries are able to keep their social programs intact. Namely, their governments don't have extremely high levels of public debt.

    The difference between Finland and Greece, for example, is that Finland owes a factor of four less as a fraction of its GDP. The other Scandinavian countries do even better.

    Bottom line is that if you want pretty social programs or anything else on the public dollar, you need to control spending and borrowing. That's austerity in a nutshell. I find it bizarre that the countries which best exemplify this maxim are the ones being presented as a demonstration of why austerity supposedly doesn't work.

  112. Re:What an opportunity! by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Uh, no.
    The value of Widget A reflects its potential use as a component in Widget B.
    The value of something is never anything more than the sum of the value of the raw materials and labor required to make it. The price is another matter.

    Voodoo economics like the shit you just spewed are exactly why we're fucked deep into an abyss of debt while doing an inflationary spiral.

  113. Re: What an opportunity! by hackwrench · · Score: 1
    Somehow you've managed to miss the austere in austerity. The trait of great self-denial (especially refraining from worldly pleasures). Not only that, you've manage to ignore the role of income.
    http://fee.org/freeman/detail/...

    Scandinavians pay for these benefits with high taxes. The governments make no effort to hide this, as evidenced by this paragraph from a Danish government tax guide for new citizens.

  114. Re: What an opportunity! by khallow · · Score: 1

    Somehow you've managed to miss the austere in austerity. The trait of great self-denial (especially refraining from worldly pleasures). Not only that, you've manage to ignore the role of income.

    Income is a hard problem to control. Spending is an easy problem to control. If spending were the most important part of income, then Greece would have never gotten into trouble in the first place.

    And "austerity" is not being used in the meaning above. It's painfully obvious that Greece isn't embracing any sort of self-denial, but is rather being subject to fiscal discipline by external pressure.

  115. This is the year of BITCOIN on the DESKTOP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now! It's finally succeeding! Just wait a liiiiitle longer!