Slashdot Mirror


Hacker Group That Hit Twitter, Facebook, Apple and Microsoft Intensifies Attacks

itwbennett writes: The hacker group, which security researchers from Kaspersky Lab and Symantec call Wild Neutron or Morpho, has broken into the networks of over 45 large companies since 2012. After the 2013 attacks against Twitter, Facebook, Apple and Microsoft were highly publicized, the group went underground and temporarily halted its activity. However, its attacks resumed in 2014 and have since intensified, according to separate reports released Wednesday by Kaspersky Lab and Symantec.

40 comments

  1. Hak teh Planit! by Chas · · Score: 2

    Oh wait, they're a cybercrime gang.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  2. It might help if courts took hacking seriously by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But in some countries it seems to me its still treated as vaguely harmless probably because the judiciary don't really have a clue.

    Need an example? Finland recently gave Lizard Squard hacker Julius Kivimaik a 2 years suspended. I mean he only hacked 50K systems (yes 50,000) and made a hoax bomb threat to a plane. You have to wonder if the judge in that courtroom was asleep through the prosecution case.

    With lenient treatment like that its no surprise smart (in a narrow sphere) but socially dysfunctional teens keep doing this shit.

    1. Re:It might help if courts took hacking seriously by mrbester · · Score: 1, Troll

      There's also Hacker Team doing this, but as they are employed by governments apparently that's just fine and dandy.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    2. Re:It might help if courts took hacking seriously by Racemaniac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just wondering, what dus 50k systems mean in this context. Is it like downloading 50k mp3's (sounds impressive but isn't, you can automate most of it), or is it he put serious work and did serious damage to each of those systems (would be quite a full time job with lots of overtime though).
      Just write 1 good worm and you'll have "hacked 50k systems"... It just sounds like some stupid number that's supposed to sound impressive, but has hardly any meaning.

    3. Re:It might help if courts took hacking seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We need to frame hacking as a part of Rape Culture. Then everyone even slightly involved can be demonized, and hacking will go from beign "cool" to being a source of shaming.

    4. Re:It might help if courts took hacking seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you a good hacker or a bad hacker? Apparently, now, the good hackers are the ones who rob and extort people and companies for personal gain. While the bad ones, apparently, are the ones who try to help people - with no personal benefit to them. The courts have their priorities...

    5. Re:It might help if courts took hacking seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no need for courts, but action. Just the bloody corpses of hackers to be found in an abandoned basement, with their passwords being written on the wall in their own blood. And a photo of that on Instagram.

      There is no other way because hackers don't fear mutilitation of an arm, eyes or genitals, as they have never driven a car or mounted a babe. As long as they can think and have just one channel of sensory I/O remaining, they can hurt the society. They only fear nullifying their information content, for which you have to take off their heads from their necks.

    6. Re:It might help if courts took hacking seriously by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 2

      We need to frame hacking as a part of Rape Culture. Then everyone even slightly involved can be demonized, and hacking will go from beign "cool" to being a source of shaming.

      Or, we could just be sensible. It's always an option - instead of blindly following you into the quagmires of stupid.

    7. Re:It might help if courts took hacking seriously by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Sadly there's some truth in what you say.

    8. Re:It might help if courts took hacking seriously by CreatureComfort · · Score: 3, Funny

      Porn. It was porn.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    9. Re:It might help if courts took hacking seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Data stolen, using CC info to buy items.. Exploiting running systems running ColdFusion.

    10. Re:It might help if courts took hacking seriously by Rasperin · · Score: 1

      Because that has worked so well in the United States. Last I checked we criminalize everything over here including hacking and it's not taken exactly lightly. But people still do it, and people still sell drugs! We need a better solution, but using the legal system doesn't work. It really doesn't. I'm not going to whine about people losing their future livelyhood or how bad prisons are. I just want to point out kids still do it as a hobby and so do adults.

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    11. Re:It might help if courts took hacking seriously by idbeholda · · Score: 1

      They got in through the backdoor.

  3. identified how? by ed.han · · Score: 1

    i don't know boo about pen-testing, but are these guys tagging their work in some way, or is something a lot more sophisticated taking place?

  4. Cunts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What a bunch of cunts. Dicks like these are ruining the internet. Fuck off already and do something useful you bunch of fucking asshats.

    1. Re:Cunts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      @anon: "What a bunch of cunts. Dicks like these are ruining the internet. Fuck off already and do something useful you bunch of fucking asshats.

      It matters a lot as in how it demonstrates what a leaky tub Microsoft Windows running on Intel hardware really is.

      [troll translation] Mummy locked up the margarine and my sister locked the bedroom door - but I've still got internet.

  5. Re:Microsoft Windows strikes again :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    By any chance, are they using computers?

  6. Totally Avoidable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well, if the so called premier security agencies and the so called peak software bodies had actually done their job and made the defective software safer and more resilient, we would not be having these conversations. One suspects this gang is making their hacks multi part, delayed over months, then combined, so that so called network flight recorders are defeated over time. Bluntly, there is a very active market for zero days, and even licensed sales.

    Oddly the hacks against offensive cyber-malware, is going to close insecurity vectors, and make things more secure overall, the proof seen in the patches being prepared. Hopefully outed 2nd rate agencies slapped for installing back-door-ed software internally!

    Stop whinging and bleating. Audit code, fix stuff, and these rascals will get tired and go away, unless they find the state sanctioned back door vectors to extend their party.

    1. Re:Totally Avoidable by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      We're still using C, we're still using ACLs, we now have so many rings below 0 on PCs we don't even use using negative numbers when talking about them any more and they've mostly only allowed rootkits to bury deeper, almost all companies allow people to access the web with the same OS instance they use to work on the internal LAN with.

      There are no easy fixes for the situation we're in.

  7. they can't be all bad by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Funny

    after all, they did attack Twitter, Facebook, Apple and Microsoft. ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:they can't be all bad by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It's not like they could do harm to anything that matters at any of those four. And if, as a result, some flaws are fixed, the whole Internet becomes a little safer.

      I don't see a problem here.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  8. non state? by umghhh · · Score: 1

    for profit maybe but assuming it is non-state agents as reports do is going to far. First argument was - embassies were not targeted . Maybe they did not target them but their colleagues from across the hall did. The profit motive is also irrelevant - we know that sometimes the agencies need double cover so one operation can finance another.

  9. de haxx0rz r st1ll haxx0rin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    though we don't know who did what exactly, we think those bogeymen are still at it. Duck and cover, everyone. Duck and cover.

  10. Taking your own advice by pigsycyberbully · · Score: 0

    They are not magically tracked by the Russian antivirus group. The antivirus programs when installed on a Windows system have root access to the Windows system, they know what websites you are visiting what readme's you have on your computer what programs you have on your computer they track everything you do every website you visit. If you set up a Linux honeypot your first visitors will be auto scans from Google, and Amazon. Everybody is spying and hacking. If Kaspersky lab and its counterpart from the U.S. doesn't want any customers they are going about it the right way. I seem to remember Kaspersky, at the last antivirus companies gathering they said "keep your mouth shut." Obviously not taking your own advice.

  11. Welcome by tom229 · · Score: 2

    In a way I welcome attacks like this. They help prove the inviability of the cloud.

    --
    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
  12. Crackers for fuck sake by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    It used to be that SLASHDOT knew the difference between hackers and crackers. So the media is telling us what geek/nerd language is and how to use it. Allow me to FTFY:

    A cracker gains illegitimate accesses to a computer system.

    A hacker accesses systems so that they can learn. i.e. You don't learn to hack, you hack to learn.

    It's bad enough hearing hipsters go 'lol'. Get.it.right.slashdot.news.for.nerds.not.noobs

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    1. Re: Crackers for fuck sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your link doesn't work, mister! Whose the noob now?

    2. Re:Crackers for fuck sake by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A cracker is also a white guy with a whip. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cracker_(pejorative) I would cringe if somebody referred to a criminal hacker kid from the Southern U.S. as a "cracker"

      The criminal hacker as a "cracker" was coined 30 years ago and still hasn't caught on. It's up there with Gnu/Linux as relevant.

      OTOH, Hackerspaces and the maker movement have done a good job at changing the meaning of 'hacker' to include both worlds. Hackerspaces are somehow more approachable and understandable to the media and general public.

  13. And these "attacks" will cease... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    And these "attacks" will cease just as soon as industry capitulates to the demands of the gov't stooges... strictly a coincidence, of course.

    1. Re:And these "attacks" will cease... by garote · · Score: 1

      Oh those wacky stooges! nyuk nyuk nyuk
      What will they demand next!

      Wait, they haven't demanded anything.

    2. Re:And these "attacks" will cease... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Even dumbass shills ought to keep from sticking their feet that far down their throats...

    3. Re:And these "attacks" will cease... by garote · · Score: 1

      Oh I see what you're doing. You're trying to say that this big anonymous h4x0r group is actually our own federal government attacking our own most successful tech industry companies, to try to get them to completely abandon the technology they're using to defend themselves from such attacks.

      That's way, waaaaay stupider than what I originally thought you were saying. Because it is prima facie self-contradictory.

      I suggest you go outside, sit in a nice sunny park for a while, and breathe some fresh air. That tinfoil hat isn't doing you any good at all.

  14. Hate to break it to you... by garote · · Score: 1

    ... but hackers and geeks stopped being the arbiters of computer-based culture at least ten years ago. Our pedantic definitions don't mean squat to a public that uses them for their own purposes.

    Besides, "cracker" was already turning unfashionable when Hackers came out in '95, and that movie gave it a shove out the door. And you just can't say it out loud in the South without getting weird looks. :D

  15. TAKKA TAKKA TAKKA TAKKA by wardrich86 · · Score: 1
  16. stfu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finland is a sovereign nation and can do whatever it wishes, crybaby

  17. Infected PCs..what to do? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Untill someone has the balls to tackle the problem of what to do with infected PCs nothing will ever change. If there was a way to take away these scum criminals tools of the trade everyone is at risk. What to do?

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  18. Stop blaming hackers on your own poor security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take some responsibility for yourself. I'm sick and tired of this nanny state culture which has grown up around the world. What saddens me is I'm not against ensuring nobody falls through the cracks. But what we have is this bull shit nanny state where people expect the state to do everything for them.

    We get our panties in a bunch over stupid ass shit and end up doing enormous damage to entire populations of people who've done nothing to no one.

  19. Re:Microsoft Windows strikes again :) by Redmancometh · · Score: 1

    This is a lot more of an important question ask than you think. A friend of mine runs a DDoS protection service, and they recently got hit by a 60 gigabit attack (Syn-flood, unamplified obviously) that was from a botnet of surveillance cameras. Shit be whack yo.