Slashdot Mirror


FCC Approves AT&T's DirecTV Purchase

An anonymous reader writes: The U.S. Federal Communications Commission has granted approval to AT&T to purchase DirecTV for $48.5 billion. AT&T will become the largest provider of cable or satellite TV in the U.S., with 26.4 million subscribers. "Adding TV customers gives AT&T more power to negotiate with big media companies over prices for those channels. The deal also combines a nationwide satellite TV service, the country's largest, with the No. 2 nationwide wireless network as time spent on mobile devices increases." The FCC did put conditions on the deal: AT&T must make fiber internet service available to 12.5 million people, offer cheaper internet plans to low-income customers, and not mess with the internet traffic of online video competitors.

58 of 100 comments (clear)

  1. I for one, welcome our monopolistic overlords by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just wish it were Ma Bell.

    1. Re:I for one, welcome our monopolistic overlords by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Along with the new commercials: Let's move to the knees, Gertrude. You haven't even touched my dirty knees.

  2. Time to cut the cord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Enough consolidation already. There is nothing left to watch on DirectTV anyway, once Stewart quits in a couple of weeks. Science channel is all ghosts and reality tv, scifi is wrestling and reality tv, discover is completely useless and history isn't even the nazi channel anymore.

    1. Re:Time to cut the cord by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Problem isn't DirecTV itself, it's already better than than any cable company. The problem is with the state of the media companies; crap shows, crap lineups, bundled packages, restrictions on what providers can do with the content, etc.

    2. Re:Time to cut the cord by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      We dropped all cable subscriptions and now only use Netflix...and it appears that nothing of value was lost. Honestly, 100 channels of crap we'd never watch and 20 more we might watch once a year (if that). As a result we get a little more time to spend doing stuff we like rather than mindlessly watching the current pop-culture fad. We may not be typical consumers of TV but we can't be the only ones who drop it and realize that we don't miss it a bit.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    3. Re:Time to cut the cord by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Funny

      They ought to make some shows about Alaska. Can't believe nobody has thought of that yet.

    4. Re: Time to cut the cord by Redbehrend · · Score: 1

      Don't remind me where Jon is going.... It's true DTV seen the end coming and said why not lol

    5. Re:Time to cut the cord by Adriax · · Score: 2

      Atleast they were honest in signaling their move from science fiction programming to low budget/knockoff crap.
      I'm still wondering how History got away with trucking/fishing reality shows.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    6. Re:Time to cut the cord by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I'm still wondering how History got away with trucking/fishing reality shows.

      Here's how: http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/i...

    7. Re:Time to cut the cord by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      ...I'm still wondering how History got away with trucking/fishing reality shows.

      Someone high up in content creation woke up and realized the rest of their programming was, well, history...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    8. Re:Time to cut the cord by SylvesterTheCat · · Score: 2

      I did the same thing over 2 years ago. I built an a grey-hoverman antenna for broadcast tv and netflix for everything else. The only change is one less drain on my money.

    9. Re:Time to cut the cord by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      They ought to make some shows about Alaska. Can't believe nobody has thought of that yet.

      Yeah! And gold, people LOVE gold, right? It's a sure thing!

      Or, I know...how about a show that takes a mildly challenging profession and drama's it up a bit? You know, take months of footage, then cut and edit to make it sound like the most dangerous thing in the world, worse than swimming with sharks while wrapped in a bacon wetsuit! It's prime-time GOLD!

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    10. Re:Time to cut the cord by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      They wandered off for a while but...They are putting out a huge number of science fiction and fantasy series.

      I hope folks watch
      Ascension
      Defiance
      Killjoys
      12 Monkeys
      Bitten
      Dark Matter
      Continuum (returns fall)
      Haven (returns fall)
      Helix (returns fall)
      Z-nation (September)
      Childhood's End (December)
      Lost Girl (2016)

      Not SciFi but related...
      Face Off

      Plus various one off movies... and of course Sharknado.

      Hmm. on second thought... ;-)

      http://www.syfy.com/shows

      ---

      Can't see anything good coming from this merger.
      Cable and internet rates are insane right now.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  3. Choice. Dead. by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Informative

    We were looking at going with DirectTV to get away from AT&T, because AT&T sucks rotting puss-filled maggot carcases on a good day.

    There goes that plan.

    1. Re:Choice. Dead. by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      with Comcast, it takes 3 days of downloading before you can tell they are maggots.

    2. Re:Choice. Dead. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      We were looking at going with DirectTV to get away from AT&T, because AT&T sucks rotting puss-filled maggot carcases on a good day.

      That's as accurate description of AT&T as I've ever heard. We refer to them as "an overflowing shit-bucket with a turd for a handle."

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  4. Death to choice by theArtificial · · Score: 1

    Eek. Wonder how long it'll take them to mangle the service? On the bright side it's one more reason to get away from TV.

    --
    Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
  5. Re:legally binding by Adriax · · Score: 1

    Pretty sure they are.
    If they weren't then how has the FCC pushed similar conditions on other companies?

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
  6. Goodbye! by zamboni1138 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Goodbye DirecTV/AT&T!

    I'm not even going to wait for the first shoe to drop. I am now devoting some actual time to finding a valid replacement for DirecTV that will still give me access to all the shows I like: Mr. Robot, The Americans, Silicon Valley, Veep, Halt and Catch Fire, and various shows about catching gold and crabs. Right now Sling TV from Dish Network looks like the best offer.

    But just fuck AT&T. I've been a customer at one level or another for going on two decades now. I thought DirecTV was a sneaky asshole with their never ending un-announced rate increases on everything for no good reason, hundreds of channel slots wasted on non-stop infomercials, shopping channels, etc.

    I can't imagine what good ol' AT&T has in store for the millions of innocents that just want decent TV at a decent price. The horror.

    1. Re:Goodbye! by future+assassin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There you go https://thepiratebay.la/ all you need is a big hd and a media box.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    2. Re:Goodbye! by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah whats up with that does anyone really want to pay $100 to watch 40 different home shopping channels?

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    3. Re:Goodbye! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      HA!!! and how about that airline food!

    4. Re:Goodbye! by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Well actually the last time I flew I took Alaska airlines and the cheese and fruit platter and pulled pork dish were both good on the way to alaska.

      I did not however like the reuben sandwich they were selling on the way back.

      Overall as a first time flyer I was impressed with the food but surprised at the lack of peanuts.

      The view was great we even flew through a lightning storm on the way back.

      However the wifi sucked a 50Mb ipad app would not finish on a 3 hour flight.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    5. Re:Goodbye! by WCLPeter · · Score: 1

      that will still give me access to all the shows I like

      * Mr. Robot - $24.99
      * The Americans - $34.99
      * Silicon Valley - $24.99
      * Veep - $24.99
      * Halt and Catch Fire - $24.99

      For about the price of a month's worth of cable you could have all the shows you're interested in and save the other 11 months for something else. I did this years ago, picked up an AppleTV - works great for streaming Netflix and my purchased DVD / Blu-Rays I've been ripping into my iTunes Library - and now just get season's passes for the shows I watch. For local events I put a DB8e on my roof, though if you live in an apartment you could mount it to a weighted pole on your balcony or window.

      All in, between my Netflix subscription, Crunchyroll (I really love Anime), DramaFever (I really love Korean dramas), and my iTunes seasons passes I spent around $300 annually on my entertainment - when you consider I used to spend almost $1,500 on cable its amazing how much money I saved. I also have more free time, less of it spent channel surfing looking for stuff to watch, and I never have to watch commercials unless I'm watching OTA, which is why I picked up a DVR+.

      Unless you're big on sports, and the AppleTV has been getting all the big ones lately (Hockey, Football, whatever - I don't watch sports), or your shows aren't available digitally there really isn't much reason to get cable / satellite anymore. I've been cable free for nearly 4 years now and I can honestly say that I don't miss it.

      Note: While I'm Canadian, I'm assuming you're an American and have used the iTunes prices from the US store

    6. Re:Goodbye! by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      install peer guardian and flashblock, then use primewire.ag for all that. Most TV shows are up within an hour of their initial broadcast.

  7. Drat by p51d007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Less competition, higher prices.

    1. Re:Drat by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Less competition, higher prices.

      Yup. If I had mod points, they'd be yours. These mergers or consolidations NEVER result in a benefit to the consumer. Never, I've not seen it happen once in the last 40 years. It always means crappier service and higher prices.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  8. Re:legally binding by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Why not? The FCC could disallow the whole deal instead if the parties don't agree.

  9. We need a verification stage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I read someone else's comment that said that companies should be required to complete the past-due, public-benefit conditions made for their previous mergers before merging again. I like that idea. Maybe if we repeat that enough then it will start to become a real criteria.

  10. And they are back..... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    AT&T is back in the cable TV biz.... and they almost destroyed it the last time they tried this.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:And they are back..... by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Well the trucks they park out back of where I work advertise att's cable service although its not sold here.

      The people who work there think they are about to have to start carrying dishes on their trucks.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    2. Re:And they are back..... by _anomaly_ · · Score: 1

      They have been for a long time with U-Verse. I'm a subscriber right now, and previously about 6 years ago or so. It's not bad, but I'm still seriously considering cutting all cable TV cords.

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
  11. Dum dum te dum dum te dum dum te dum by enjar · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Imperials claim a new system. The power of the Death Star will not be denied.

  12. Anyone else by The-Ixian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just getting by with Netflix and Amazon Prime?

    I haven't had a full cable TV package for at least 6 years and I really can't say that I miss it.

    I suppose there are some shows that I might be missing out on... but they eventually make it to Prime or Netflix and then I can just binge them. And if they don't, I never saw them in the first place so I can't miss what I never had...

    Recently when CenturyLink offered me a bundle deal with my gigabit Internet it almost doubled the price... I opted to just pay the full price for the Internet. I don't understand why people would pay $100 extra a month for hundreds of channels they will never watch...

    When will channels just be offered a-la-cart?

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    1. Re:Anyone else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When media companies start allowing distributors to offer them a la carte. Which will never happen when there are studios pumping out crap no one wants to see surviving by getting bundled with the stuff people do want.

    2. Re:Anyone else by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Which typically consists of 19 channels of crap and one good channel people actually want when suddenlink dropped viacom the only channel I missed was comedy central and suddenlink replaced it with fxx which has better movies anyway.

      But yeah just amazon prime and netflix here tried hulu for about 20 minutes told them to cancel the trial after i saw they were going to have me pay to watch ads.

      Netflix and amazon prime user for 1 year 7 months now.

      See microsoft just because you jack the prices up from $250 a year to $700 doesn't mean people can pay it and I enjoy netflix and amazon prime a lot more than being able to test any version of office, windows home, pro, server, teriyaki edition

      It still costs less per year for both services than the original technet sub or the new msdn price.

      So dear microsoft I hope you are as happy without my money as I am without you!

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    3. Re:Anyone else by antdude · · Score: 1

      How about live events like sports? :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  13. Well shit by acoustix · · Score: 1

    How long before DTV's customer service takes a plunge?

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Well shit by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      About six years ago. Seriously, that's one of the reasons I dropped them and went with Charter cable. They sucked six years ago and I imagine they still suck now.

      Plus, it's really nice now being able to watch television when it's raining.

  14. offer cheaper internet plans to low-income by networkzombie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless they specify what cheaper is, and what speed of Internet qualifies as worthy of the price they charge, this will still be screwing over low-income customers. I've seen these cheaper plans from other companies that were required by deals and they suck. 384 Kbps for $18.91 per month is bullshit. If it wasn't illegal to share Internet with neighbors I could supply 100 families with Internet at that speed with my overpriced $60 tube. For Comcast you must "Have at least one child eligible to participate in the National School Lunch Program" to qualify for their low income Internet. And most people know what “up to 5 Mbps” means... Crap!

    1. Re:offer cheaper internet plans to low-income by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Afaik the business att uverse plan we have at work being a business plan has no such limitation although it is $45 for 12mbps 1mbps up basic 384 service is only like $19/mo for residents I think.

      But really what are you going to do with 384Kbps?
      no other wired provider in my area even offer plans that slow and I have 2 other providers.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  15. Escape Clause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder then since DTV is changing hands and getting a new owner can us customers get out of our contract?

  16. AT&T Will Service The Account! by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1
    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  17. 12.5 million people really? thats all??? by sims+2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So they are going to cover New York, Los Angeles and Chicago and leave everyone else with dsl and dialup at the same prices they charge for fiber Got it!

    Seriously I can already get fiber through the city whats taking att so long to catch up? And I still have 0 wired options at home other than dialup.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    1. Re:12.5 million people really? thats all??? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      They could offer fiber to everyone in the state of Pennsylvania. (12.7m)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  18. History? by sycodon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can anyone cite any instance of one cable provider buying another and then seeing the rates go down and selection go up?

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  19. Re:legally binding by ganjadude · · Score: 1
    this one should not be

    offer cheaper internet plans to low-income customers

    the prices should be the same for everyone

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  20. Tried that by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    doesn't work if you've got a teenage daughter. There are a tonne of shows not on netflix/amazon. I suppose I could tell her no, but TV for teens is a social thing. Kinda like how us nerds used to gather round and trade strategies on beating Zelda/Mario. Since most of the shows are on at 8pm (just after most teens finish their Homework but just before bed) it's not practical for her to just go over to her friends house. It's part of a finely honed machine designed to entrap parents...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Tried that by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      grow a pair! you think caving in and helping your daugher rot her brain with stupid tv is a GOOD thing?

      parents. taking the easy way out, because.....reasons!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Tried that by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Firstly most of the major networks let you watch their shows on either their own service or hulu for free w/ads the day after they air.

      Second you can even buy a dvr nowadays that will record antenna tv altho the monthly service for the guide is more than a netflix sub on top of the dvr price.

      Thirdly i suppose you could try something like sling tv although i really think thats more of a ripoff than hulu plus.

      I can't stand to watch tv on cable or antenna anymore after having netflix for over a year on antenna I lose interest in the show after 10 minutes of ads and on cable I lose intrest while thinking about how much of my bill went to paying for that ad that I didn't want to see.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  21. Netflix, Amazon, Hulu (&& wtf is up with / by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1
    We also have Hulu Plus, so we can catch Modern Family and The Middle --- although I don't know if we actually need the subscription anymore... On another note, what the F is up with slashdot these days?

    uMatrix log, slashdot.org

    18:20:29 script http:||slashdot.org/?source=autorefresh{inline_script}
    18:20:29 cookie http:||slashdot.org/{localStorage}
    18:20:28 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/classic/img/glyphish-icons-16-w.png
    18:20:28 script http:||www.googleadservices.com/pagead/conversion.js
    18:20:28 image http:||b.scorecardresearch.com/b?c1=2&c2=6035546&rn=0.18806085423619878&c7=http%3A%2F%2Fslashdot.org%2F%3Fsource%3Dautorefresh&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c10=&c15=&c16=&c8=Slashdot%20(16)&c9=http%3A%2F%2Fslashdot.org%2F%3Fsource%3Dautorefresh&cv=1.7
    18:20:28 css http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/font/sdicon.woff?release_20150701c
    18:20:28 image https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws...
    18:20:28 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/logo_w_l.png
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/medicine_64.png?refresh=now
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/government_64.png
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/news_64.png
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/internet_64.png
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/privacy_64.png
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/firefox_64.png
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/att_64.png
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/opensource_64.png
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/articles/15/07/10/141210-1-thumblg.jpg
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/articles/15/06/29/141209-1-thumblg.jpg
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/articles/15/07/16/141213-1-thumblg.jpg
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/articles/15/07/07/141210-2-thumblg.jpg
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/articles/15/07/17/141211-1-thumblg.jpg
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/articles/15/07/07/141208-1-thumblg.jpg
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/articles/15/07/01/141208-1-thumblg.jpg
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/articles/15/06/30/141210-1-thumblg.jpg
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/articles/15/07/17/141209-1-thumblg.jpg
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/articles/15/07/17/141210-1-thumblg.jpg
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/articles/15/06/27/141208-1-thumblg.jpg
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/articles/15/07/07/141209-1-thumblg.jpg
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/articles/15/07/24/141216-1-thumblg.jpg
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/articles/15/07/24/141214-1-thumblg.jpg
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/articles/15/07/24/141215-1-thumblg.jpg
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/nasa_64.png
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/transportation_64.png
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/youtube_64.png
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/communications_64.png
    18:20:27 image http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/android_64.png
    18:20:27 script http:||www.google-analytics.com/ga.js
    18:20:26 script http:||www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js
    18:20:26 script http:||s.ntv.io/serve/load.js
    18:20:26 script http:||player.ooyala.com/v3/85d52cbb9c924733934b1880e9cde580
    18:20:26 script http:||cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/slashdot/loader.js
    18:20:26 script http:||widget-cdn.rpxnow.com/js/lib/login.slashdot.org/widget.js
    18:20:26 script http:||widget-cdn.rpxnow.com/js/lib/login.slashdot.org/engage.js
    18:20:25 script http:||www.googleadservices.com/pagead/conversion.js
    18:20:25 script http:||s.ntv.io/serve/load.js
    18:20:25 script http:||player.ooyala.com/v3/85d52cbb9c924733934b1880e9cde580
    18:20:25 script http:||a.fsdn.com/sd/all-minified.js

  22. Re:Netflix, Amazon, Hulu (&& wtf is up wit by sims+2 · · Score: 1

    I dunno but it causes safari to hang and crash quite often on my ipad.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  23. Re:Netflix, Amazon, Hulu (&& wtf is up wit by adolf · · Score: 1

    Slashdot's 3rd-party linking is now worse than even CNET, Target, Walmart, etc.

    All hail our new corporate overlords. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. The king is dead, long live the king.

    etc.

    The writing has been on the wall for years, now: Why are we still here?

  24. Re:legally binding by davester666 · · Score: 1

    Yes, they are legally binding.

    Unfortunately, there is no monitoring or enforcement mechanism, so effectively it is as if there are no conditions applied.

    Well, I suppose some crazy guy at AT&T will read the document, and go "hey, we should be doing this", maybe try to actually implement some of the rules in his department and then be summarily fired. It's possible, but unlikely.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  25. Re:Are you sure? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how Netflix, et al, is so much better in that respect.

    It costs $12 a month versus a hundred or so. You're still not getting better programming, but at least you're paying a tenth as much to not get better programming. :-)

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  26. Re: AT&T is now your satellite TV company by Scared+Rabbit · · Score: 1

    The last time I did business with AT&T they sent me to collections. This wouldn't be so unusual, except they owed me money at the time and when I'd call them to deal with it they couldn't explain why they did it. I want in the market for satellite TV, but I certainly won't be going to direct TV if I ever am.

  27. This acquisition is a win win for consumers and AT by rshimizu12 · · Score: 1

    This acquisition is a win win for consumers and AT&T. Fiber to the premises (fiber to the home) is expanded by 12.5 million. This also gives AT&T the ability to free up bandwidth over twisted pair where it is needed. AT&T is required to maintain net neutrality as well. There will also be more competition for high speed internet as well. This also gives AT&T the ability to compete in foreign markets for satellite TV.

  28. Re:Are you sure? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    It's not quite fair to exclude the cost of your ISP or wireless plan. Whether you "need it anyway" for other purposes or not, you still can't ACTUALLY get Netflix for only $12 month unless your ISP is free (and fast enough to support decent HD streaming).

    Well, you can do their DVD service for $8, but yes, for their streaming service, you do have to have an Internet connection. Of course, if you have a smartphone, at least in the U.S., your cell service provider will likely require you to have a data plan anyway, so these days it's hard to not have a connection that you could potentially use for watching Netflix if you wanted to. (Whether that data plan would cost you more money if you watched Netflix all day is another matter, of course.)

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.