Slashdot Mirror


Researchers: The Thermostat In Your Office May Be Sexist

sciencehabit writes: If you're constantly bundling up against your office building's air conditioning, blame Povl Ole Fanger. In the 1960s, this Danish scientist developed a model, still used in many office buildings around the world, which predicts comfortable indoor temperatures for the average worker. The problem? The average office worker in the 1960s was a 40-year-old man sporting a three-piece suit. But fear not, those for whom the 'work sweater' has become a mandatory addition to office attire: Researchers say they have built a better model.

43 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. Peh by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds more like "slashdot is shilling for clickbait." In other news, users continue to flee slashdot in droves, DICE perplexed as to why site is becoming massively unprofitable.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
    1. Re:Peh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As soon as I saw the article in the Firehose, I knew they wouldn't be able to resist the SJW's siren call and it'd end up on SJWdot.

      Honestly the biggest issue I have with modern Slashdot is the contempt you can feel from the editors for the readers. The editors aren't members of the Slashdot community. They clearly hate the community. See beta and the polls being moved to the main timeline. See the endless parade of stupid SJW articles like this one. See the lack of actual news for nerds - things like Comic-Con go entirely unreported. Old Slashdot almost certainly would have mentioned the Pixels movie, new Slashdot probably only will once they realize the SJWs are up in arms about how "sexist" it is for only starring male gamers or something. I'm not a big anime fan but I honestly miss Slashdot reporting on anime because when it did I knew that it really was news for nerds and not just some dumb "business tech site" like it clearly wants to be these days.

    2. Re:Peh by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed, calling this "sexist" just devalues the word. It's based on old data and demographics have changed, that's all. Only a refusal to acknowledge that and act on it might be considered sexist.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Peh by beelsebob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not really old data, it's just that the modern author hasn't considered the practicalities of the situation.

      Offices *still* have 40 year old men (and 20 year old ones, and 50 year old ones) in them, it just happens they have a bunch of women too. Those men can not remove clothes to become cooler without incurring the wrath of HR (quite rightly). Those women can add clothes to solve being too cold. Simply averaging the temperature people want the office to be set to does not make everyone comfortable, it just makes a bunch of mean sweaty and sleepy, with no way to correct for it.

    4. Re:Peh by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the other practicality is that if its set too warm, there will be more post-lunch snoozing than there would be if you keep the place frosty.

      Forget comfort, its all about productivity!

    5. Re:Peh by jafiwam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's probably that the comments offer nothing of value, having become the bastion of old white hateful assholes.

      Not point in visiting a news aggregator site where the user contributed content repels more than half your target audience.

      But keep being a prick and lamenting the fall of /. , by all means.

      See, the thing is, if you don't call someone an asshole for no reason all the time, they have somewhere to fall.

      Once you do, being an asshole has no cost. I already am one. I am white, middle age, have a job, never been on welfare, never sucked another man's dick, never smoked crack, and never went to a hip-hop rave, I am not a fat ghetto hog with more children than rooms in my section 8 apartment.

      I have NOTHING TO LOSE by being a asshole to some twat that comes oozing menstral thoughts onto slashdot berating me for being too white or too manly (a very preposterous thought on a NERD SITE.)

      I am an asshole by what I AM by my very NATURE according to you twats.

      Combine that with a steady stream of the same old shit as other sites, the same logic contorting and logic violating reasons for posting stupid stories about shit the productive audience (you don't count in that) doesn't want to discuss.

      What you SJWs don't understand is left alone, the discussion gets intellectual and interesting and stays out of those concepts you don't like. At which time, you can participate in that culture too. We USED to have some cool discussions here 10 years ago. Here, nobody knows who the fuck you are, no avatar, no required sig, no required USERNAME for fucks-sake it's impossible to not be hiding if you just ignore it. If someone thinks you are a butch-assed female, is because you stated such. Lastly, Slashdot will ultimately fail at the new media ideals as other sites are better suited and populated for it. Ultimately slashdot will fail.

      Nobody has any reason not to engage in stupid squabble fights and get out artistic haiku about your cunt anymore. That's the only entertainment that happens here now.

      So your complaint with this place is YOU.

      Fuck off.

    6. Re:Peh by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Those women can add clothes to solve being too cold.

      Clothes doesn't help after a point. If it's too cold, one's fingers can get cold, stiff and uncoordinated and that makes it harder to type. Ignoring the fact that women have lower peripheral circulation than men on average exacerbating the problem, I personally find that at my ideal comfortable temperature for working in indoor winter clothes (i.e. long trousers, t-shirt) it's in fact too cold for me to type with 100% comfort. I find that I'm something like the woman in this one: http://dilbert.com/strip/2005-...

      But yes, it makes sense to go for the coldest temperature that people can tolerate given normal office attire. Sadly for me, fingerless gloves aren't normal office attire, so that temperature is above my ideal level.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:Peh by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not really old data, it's just that the modern author hasn't considered the practicalities of the situation.

      Offices *still* have 40 year old men (and 20 year old ones, and 50 year old ones) in them, it just happens they have a bunch of women too.

      So how do we manages this so as not to be a part of the Patriarchy and it's incessant microagressions?

      Do we adjust the temperature to suit the one lady in my office who likes it at 80 degrees?

      Do we adjust it to another lady who likes it at 68 degrees?

      Or how about the one who likes it the way it's set now? Is she a dupe of the male dominated hegemony, and a traitor to her sisters?

      Even if my personal experience of a slim majority of women preferring temperatures higher than what I like, calling the temp settings sexist merely shows the lengths that people will go to when they want to feel oppressed.

      I'm envisioning Big Red freaking out about a one degree too low thermostat setting, and how little girls are set up for a lifetime of subservience and disappointment when they notice the thermostat at home is set up as the patriarch demands it.

      So - can you tell a persons gender by the temperature thay are most comfortable? tl;dr version. This is bullshit - non gender biased human entities happen to have different temperatures at which they are most comfortable.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:Peh by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Funny

      It seems like every other post lately has someone raving about clickbaiting and users leaving the site

      That's very true, though in this case, the article is particularly stupid, or at least referring to the air temperature as "sexist".

      Just don't let the Weather Channel find out about this - I can hear it now......

      "As the cold front approaches, the temperatures will be dropping into the sexist region, and we're expecting it getting to patriarchy level by tomorrow morning. So bundle up ladies, the microagression index is off the charts tonight!"

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:Peh by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What you SJWs don't understand

      What SJWs don't understand, along with many other people is your post which seems to be a long, angry undirected rant at I'm not sure what precisely.

      comes oozing menstral thoughts onto slashdot

      WTF is a menstral thought?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    10. Re:Peh by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      And the final punch line is to set the modern thermostat even lower because everybody, men and women alike, is a fatass.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    11. Re:Peh by Copid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think this illustrates the absurdity of the situation. We blast the AC down to the point where people are wearing gloves in order to function normally.

      The amount of energy wasted to make that happen as opposed to floating the temperature up from 68 to 70 must be staggering. The counter "can only strip off so much clothing" argument seems to assume that people would be completely nude at 70 or 71 degrees, which seems like a stretch. IIRC, the productivity research seems to indicate that 71 is about the sweet spot.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    12. Re:Peh by Ryanrule · · Score: 3, Insightful

      t shirt is not indoor winter clothes.

    13. Re:Peh by stdarg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What SJWs don't understand, along with many other people is your post which seems to be a long, angry undirected rant at I'm not sure what precisely.

      It's directed at the person who said, "It's probably that the comments offer nothing of value, having become the bastion of old white hateful assholes." Clearly an anti-white racist who deservedly got smacked down.

      Now do you understand, or at least see who/what the post was directed at?

    14. Re:Peh by travisco_nabisco · · Score: 2

      Part of the issue is that normal business/business casual attire has men in long sleeves and pants, where as women often opt to wear a skirt and something short sleeved, both of which are much cooler than the dress pants, long shirt and tie. If women chose to wear warmer clothes as their main layer, they wouldn't have quite as much of a problem.

  2. Proposed solution is more sexist by Noughmad · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since TFS doesn't say, the old model says 21C is the best, while the "new" model says 24C is the best. The problem is, of course, that one can wear a sweater in colder temperatures, but it's difficult (or inappropriate) to cope with higher temperature.

    As a young fat (by European standards, not American) male in a job with no format attire requirement, I usually wear a t-shirt and shorts in the summer, so there's not much left to take off. I'm still more comfortable at lower temperatures (22-23). I actually like wearing a hoodie, but I never do at the office because it's too hot there.

    And no, opening a window (as suggested in TFA) is not a solution when there's 30 degrees outside.

    --
    PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    1. Re:Proposed solution is more sexist by andreas.hummelbrunne · · Score: 2

      And that's exaclty the reason why I have an industrial fan behind me. It's even hotter outside so I can't open a window but the office is STILL too warm. So all I can do is blow air across my skin and let my sweat cool me down.

    2. Re:Proposed solution is more sexist by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

      I'd also be interested in where this data comes from. I've noticed that, in general, air-conditioning in the US is done for coolness and in Europe for heat. In the US/Australia when you step into a building, train, or aeroplane, you feel chilled air (70F/21C). In Europe when you step into the same environment you feel warm air (24-26C or even warmer, don't know what that is in F).

      It's most noticeable when you're flying around the world and transfer from a US/Australian to a non-US airline, you go from (what I find) reasonably cool air to sitting in a sweatbox. I also find working in offices in Europe during the summer quite unpleasant, it can often be warmer inside the air-conditioned office than outside on an already-warm day (when one air-conditioned office hit 26-28C I relocated to the basement, which wasn't actually that much cooler).

      So here's a simpler solution: If you feel too hot in an air-conditioned environment, move to the US (I won't say move to Australia because you'll make up for the heat once you step outside). If you feel too cold, move to Europe.

    3. Re:Proposed solution is more sexist by ruir · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fortunately I have an office for myself. 15 no less, still comfortable until it reaches 19. When I do visit the communal areas, at 25 I cannot really stay there for long.

    4. Re:Proposed solution is more sexist by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's just what I came here to say. I walk around in the absolute minimum amount of clothes, and yet am still forced out of the office sometimes when someone goes into the meeting room and cranks up the controls. When I have to stay in the office during those times, I have to fight the urge to fall asleep. Today, the air-con stopped working and we all froze; but the productivity didn't fall because of it.

      I still can't figure out why people feel the need to be warmer inside when it is cold outside. I don't dare warm clothes in the winter when going to work, because I know that I will burn up when I get inside. Instead, I wear layers of clothes, with my summer clothes underneath for when I am at work. Don't people know how thermostats work? You don't need to give hints to make it warmer by turning up the dial; if the cold outside has made the temperature go down in the building then the temperature controls will keep heating until it goes back up. It's not like it goes into overdrive and heat faster just because you push it to the max.

      Finally, who actually thinks that people set temperature controls based on studies done in the 1960s? More often it will just be set on what seems reasonable by the person who operates the controls.

    5. Re:Proposed solution is more sexist by LWATCDR · · Score: 2

      The also left off that productivity drops faster with heat than cold.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Proposed solution is more sexist by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Been there, done that. Move to the server room until the noise drives you out, then move back in again when the heat in the rest of the office gets too much.

    7. Re:Proposed solution is more sexist by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      It's not the temperature, it's the humidity; at any temperature.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    8. Re:Proposed solution is more sexist by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not to mention that there's ample research suggesting that people are more active, alert, and productive at cooler temperatures compared to warmer.

      Finally, while they certainly had electric typewriters, I doubt that the 1960s office had anywhere near the 'typical' warming-load of multiple 100+W heaters (computer, monitor, maybe printer, etc) at nearly every desk.

      --
      -Styopa
    9. Re:Proposed solution is more sexist by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      It's not the temperature, it's the humidity; at any temperature.

      No question. Earlier this week, temps were in the low 80s and I was dying. Sun came out, temperature went up to 96 and it felt wonderful. Then clouds moved back in and I'm dying again.

      Indoor thermostat is at 83 and with a little fan action that's fine, because the A/C is pulling water out of the air.

  3. Even for men it's too cold by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 2

    Even for a 40+-year-old male offices are too cold most of the time. And in southern Arizona the settings meant you hit a literally 40F+ wall walking out the building door. That isn't healthy. Although if you have to err it's better to have it set on the cool side, people can always add a sweater to stay warmer but you usually can't legally take clothing off if it's too warm.

  4. Re:BS by Blymie · · Score: 2

    Saving money? Guess it depends on locale.

    9 months of the year here, you're heating at night. 7 months of the year, you're heating 24x7. Much of the rest of the year, A/C isn't a biggie.

    Saving here means cooler, not hotter. Likely the same for the Northern 1/2 of the US too.

  5. Not just sexist by X10 · · Score: 2

    In most offices it is very warm in winter, and very cold in summer. In winter, the heater is turned up too high, and in summer, the airco makes it way too cold. For the environment it's better to make the office just a little bit cooler than outside, and in winter, just warm enough to be comfortable. That will save a lot of energy, and prevent global warming. Which makes me think: is global warming sexist? Does global warming favor women?

    --
    no, I don't have a sig
  6. I rarely find offices cold enough by waspleg · · Score: 2

    because they turn off A/C over weekends and whatnot to "save money" where it's probably cheaper to just maintain the temperature rather than start having to cool everything again.

    My apartment is rarely cool enough either because it's from the 60's and has shitty insulation and we've had it break consistently every year for the last 3 years. The complex is run by a corporate office out of another state and local management has changed 12 times in 7 years, so rather than replacing anything it limps along with duck tape and prayers. My electric bill was $190 last month, 960 sq feet should be easier to cool.

  7. I/m a real man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm a real man. I work outside doing manly work. All you pussies in your offices need to grow a pair and come outdoors.

    Whining about how your little cubicle isn't just how you like it is not MANLY !

    Come outdoors and meet the men's men !

    1. Re:I/m a real man by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      I'm a real man. I work outside doing manly work.

      Are you a lumberjack? And if so, are you OK?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:I/m a real man by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      With a good night's sleep, he's probably ready to work all day.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  8. All it comes to preferences. by ruir · · Score: 2

    I work in southern europe, and normally here people like it warm - so I am lucky I have an office mostly for myself. For me the comfortable settings in summer time are somewhere between 15 and 19. When I do get to go myself to communal areas, it is disgraceful, they like to run it at 25-26, and when someone is there alone and puts it colder, they passively-aggressively set the temperature to +30 afterwards when no one is looking.

  9. Go ahead, blame the machine. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It is the people who control the thermostats, and you call the thermostat sexist? Next you would blame the guns for shooting deaths and not the triggermen/triggerwomen.

    Anyway, at temperatures below 28 deg c, simple fans can make people feel a couple of degrees cooler. Most offices do not permit space heaters, but I find people sneaking it in anyway, but small personal fans are usually permitted. I have always depended on these personal fans to control the micro climate of my personal work space. Can be used to deflect the air from the vent away sometimes, towards me other times, towards the office door to encourage circulation...

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  10. Re:Men and women are the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This article is implying that women need different temperatures. It is sexist.

    Article implying that someone wearing a wool coat over a woolen vest over a long sleeve shirt over an undershirt prefers a lower temperature than someone wearing a thigh-length skirt and bare shoulders seems to be articulating basic thermodynamics. Clearly the solution is to popularize "basketball uniform" as masculine business costume, so we can all be comfortable at 24 oC.

  11. Re:Men and women are the same by Rockoon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clearly the solution is to popularize "basketball uniform" as masculine business costume, so we can all be comfortable at 24 oC.

    At 24C I'm not even comfortable naked and I'm pretty sure that nobody else would be comfortable with me being naked either.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  12. My work area is set to 75f, and I am sweltering by Hasaf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As many have said, part of the problem is the acceptable business attire differences for men and women. The women where I work typically wear a thin shirt and a pair of shorts or skirt. Footwear is a pair of sandals.

    For men acceptable attire is a shirt, over a T-shirt (I even got hassled because I was wearing a tank-top under my shirt one day), and a tie. The tie mandates that the shirt is buttoned up to the top. Then add long pants and full coverage shoes and socks. To top that off, we are "encouraged" to wear a coat when not engaged in physical activities.

    It should come as no surprise that the men want the building a lot cooler; or allow the fashion to change so the men can wear lighter clothing.

  13. Re: BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    What does the cool air teach their nipples?

    Taut, you ignorant shitbox. TAUT.

  14. Re:Mankini by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

    I of course could strip down to my Mankini. The women would be distracted I am sure.

    You know, as a man, I can confirm that it is very distracting to have one's eyes start to bleed.

    I'm not allowed to be naked ... I tried.

    You say that, but SCO (when it was cool, before the name got bought by vampires) had to introduce a dress code of "clothing must be worn during business hours" after a particular incident involving some visiting investors after hours.

    http://www.antipope.org/charli...

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  15. Lame article by Spazmania · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Basically rehashes the Washington Post article from last week. Consensus: always possible to add clothes. Only so many clothes can be taken off, and it's not just men in 3-piece suits who sweat. Can buy personal heaters. Can't buy personal air conditioners. Deal with it.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:Lame article by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Consensus: Perky nipples a cool and brighten any day.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  16. For the love of Zeus by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

    PLEASE stop with this "everything in the world is sexist against women" horseshit. You're just making yourselves look like a bunch of jackasses.

    "Stuff that matters", indeed.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  17. Re:Men and women are the same by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 2

    23.5C (~74F) is the absolute maximum temperature for me to be comfortable...and it's not even the temperature that gets me. Here in Georgia (USA), when the thermostat is set to 23.5 the timing of the compressor is just shy of perfect. At just the moment when the humidity reaches the level where the sweat isn't being wicked away, the compressor will kick in and drop the dew point in the room below 50% humidity. I think if we ran dehumidifiers instead of AC around here, we could probably save a considerable bit on energy costs by setting the cooling system to 26-27C (78-80F roughly) and letting the dehumidifier keep the humidity 50%. Hell, use a clean enough system in the dehumidifying process and you'll get a decent supply of good distilled potable water out of it too.