Slashdot Mirror


MIT Researchers Develop 'Real Steel' Robot With Human-Like Reflexes

MojoKid writes: MIT researchers have developed HERMES, an advanced robot that is capable of manipulating objects and environments in nearly the same way as humans do. But this isn't just a project design of a robot only mimicking the actions of its human controller; it can also learn and make precise movements that weren't possible with prior robots. The HERMES robot is controlled by a human operator who wears a remote controller exoskeleton. Movements carried out by the human operator are directly transferred to the humanoid robot with human-like reflexes and haptic feedback in return to the human. This means that HERMES can successfully perform actions such as picking up objects, delicately pouring coffee into a cup and even punching through walls should the need arise. HERMES was developed to help out in emergency situations that would otherwise be too dangerous for human responders.

38 comments

  1. no robot by nospam007 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "... controlled by a human operator who wears a remote controller exoskeleton. "

    IOW it's a teleoperated waldo and not a robot.

    I know I could read the article, but that would be cheating.

    1. Re:no robot by Falos · · Score: 1

      It took the summary, your post, a TFA glance, and a bit of fridge-delay for me to remember that Real Steel was a movie. And I even watched it.

      Yeah, it was pretty forgettable. Their mech-boxers were remote-operated though.

    2. Re:no robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's no moon...

    3. Re:no robot by Cederic · · Score: 2

      I thought it was very watchable. Not a movie great, but the CGI was very well implemented, the story was derivative but well constructed and it was a competent professional film.

      Boxing is boring. Robot on Robot action I'd tune in for - shit, I watched Robot Wars, which was largely the same thing.

    4. Re:no robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they add a clock to it, then it'll fit your shitty, arbitrary definition of robot.

    5. Re:no robot by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

      I immediately saw "HERPES" and therefore approved of the human's exoskeleton for avoiding that virus.

      Indeed. I read the headline as "MIT researchers have developed HERPES" and my heart went out to them.

      --
      They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
  2. The important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can it aim and fire a conventional semi-automatic rifle? If so, this could be a game changer.

  3. It's a waldo, not a robot by Pikoro · · Score: 2

    FTA: âoeWeâ(TM)ve designed the robot to be stronger than a person so weâ(TM)d imagine that in the future we want to merge some level of autonomous control along with the humanâ(TM)s intelligence.â

    We imagine. The summary has been pulled out of someone's ass. The article says nothing like what the summary does.

    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  4. This is a dupe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a dupe.

    1. Re:This is a dupe. by PPH · · Score: 2

      Of course. The robotic exoskeleton mimics the movements of its human controller. Evidently with a latency of one day.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  5. Slashdot. by jpellino · · Score: 1

    It's now the web version of "Memento"

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Slashdot. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "It's now the web version of "Memento""

      But hopefully with a larger SSD.

  6. The Aliens Chick Already Did It 30 Years Ago! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Life imitating art. Been there, done that.

    1. Re: The Aliens Chick Already Did It 30 Years Ago! by wasteoid · · Score: 1

      Sigourney Weaver?

  7. Specifically, a dupe from yesterday by tlambert · · Score: 2

    Specifically, a dupe from yesterday.
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/s...

  8. Deja Vu by jklovanc · · Score: 2

    I think I have seen this somewhere before. Editors, lol.

  9. The AI crowd exaggerating - as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A robot directly controlled by a human operator. Most underwhelming. Create a robot that can autonomously behave as nimbly and intelligently as your average bunny, and I'll be extremely impressed. In the meantime, this is nothing but same old, same old from the AI crowd.

    1. Re:The AI crowd exaggerating - as usual by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

      I don't know. Maybe launch it into orbit and perform satellite repairs without having to send astronauts and a few days of limited support equipment. Maybe do an upgrade to Hubble instead of crashing it in a few years. Or maybe jwst if something is broken rather than scrap it. Who knows, it they can be made reliable, inexpensive enough, include a copy on every dangerous remote station so if something breaks, have a technician vtelnet into the device to try and fix things remotely before sending expensive and gooey people. Send it to the bottom of the marianas trench and have it live down there. Have three shifts of oceanographers 'living' underwater 24 hours a day and going home at night. Maybe in a generation or two of upgrades later, add in some semi autonomous capability to account for transmission delays and have a small army of of these things walking across the moon or Mars for a fraction of the cost of sending a single person.

    2. Re:The AI crowd exaggerating - as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure impressing you is high on their list of goals for the project.

    3. Re:The AI crowd exaggerating - as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if they do not impress an Anonymous Coward, who are they going to impress? And, if they don't impress anyone, do they have any future?

    4. Re:The AI crowd exaggerating - as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robotics have nothing to do with AI...

  10. Wait...that sounds familiar... by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

    ...delicately pouring coffee into a cup and even punching through walls should the need arise

    So MIT has developed a robotic IT mid-level manager. Companies will love this; they should save on the salaries of those high-priced MBAs

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  11. Bet It Can't Limbo by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

    Like the real Hermes Conrad ;) http://s2.dmcdn.net/h1Bu/526x2...

  12. Isn't this by renzhi · · Score: 1

    Isn't this more like a surrogate than a robot?

  13. Get with the program! by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2

    IOW it's a teleoperated waldo and not a robot.

    Haven't you heard?

    Anything that can skitter across the table is a robot.

    Anything with eyes and moveable facial parts is a robot.

    Any machine that looks like an arm is a robot.

    A robot is anything that looks remotely like it's alive, or a piece of something alive.

    Get with the program!

  14. Big Step Forward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This could be a big help as I'm betting that the humans experiencing the robot's true perspective will complain.
    "This is terrible, everything is off balance! The feedback feels hugely lagged and unresponsive!"
    Investigating this and fixing issues until the human agent is satisfied will make it easier to train an AI to use the data in a better way.
    Maybe the bad robot walking performance is partly due to poor feedback and balance design?

    1. Re:Big Step Forward by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 2

      I'm curious what sort of feedback will be passed back to the operator if the robot falls through an unstable floor.

  15. Bryan Brown had this on FX2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  16. The day will come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or commit horrible crimes against humanity.

  17. Waldo glove suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is great! A gigantic waldo glove suit. I'm especially impressed by the stronger than human aspect. The bio feedback mechanism for bipedal movement might need a few more tweaks though.

  18. Human-like, or just human? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    If there's a human controlling it, doesn't it just have human reflexes? In fact, isn't just the human who's got any reflexes at all?

    In fact... isn't this not a robot?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Human-like, or just human? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a drone.

  19. I'll be back. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It can't be reasoned with.
    It can't be bargained with.
    It doesn't know remorse, or pity, or fear, and it cannot be stopped.

    You wonder how much thought is being put into the possibility that these systems could end up like Terminators?

  20. Yes robot by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

    First of all, "teleoperated waldo" is redundant.

    Second of all, that's still a type of robot.

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  21. Careful with that haptic feedback!! by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

    Punching through walls with full haptic feedback is not as fun as it sounds.

  22. How do you define a "robot"? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    When I do robot classes and workshops, I define a "robot" as a device which:

    1. Can perform different tasks.

    2. Uses sensors to control its operation.

    These points are pretty common for definitions. One additional requirement that I have seen is "more than three axis of movement".

    From these requirements, I would say this is a robot.

  23. MIT Science Whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...want to PWN YOUR MIND again.

    How complex is their contraption ? Can it compete with the 20k Neurons of an ANT ?

    Yeah, thought so.

    Marvin Minsky and his colleagues at MIT are bombastic science whores who like to impress people with wild claims.

    One of his claims was "an AI more intelligent than man by 2001".

    Find out what Mr Minsky and Mr Chodorkovsky have in common and you will figure that these folks have a Bombastism Complex. They simply cannot be decent, because that would be boring. They need to screw and entire nation or they will be bored.