Kali Linux 2.0 Released

An anonymous reader writes: Kali Linux 2.0 has been released, together which an assortment of interesting new features. Most importantly, Kali is now a rolling distribution, using Debian Testing as their upstream source. (Download page.) There are also huge changes to the UI, including a fully fledged, custom GNOME 3 environment, as well as support for myriad other Desktop Environments. The maintainers describe the release this way: "If Kali 1.0 was focused on building a solid infrastructure then Kali 2.0 is focused on overhauling the user experience and maintaining updated packages and tool repositories." I'm enjoying 2.0 so far. What are your thoughts and comments?

Comments

So, what is the point?

[danbob999]

What's the goal of this distribution? Why would anyone choose it over Debian testing?

Re:So, what is the point?

[darkain]

Summary sucks, so I went to the article to see what it was about... Basically it is a prebuilt penetration testing system. Now they're using the latest packages instead of older stale packages often associated with Debian, I guess?

Re:So, what is the point?

[fisted]

You do realize that even a chicken can install Debian, so long as you put sufficient grain on the Enter key, right?

My thoughts - wtf is Kali Linux?

[bigdavex]

That was a coy description.

About the Kali Linux Distribution

Kali Linux is an open source project that is maintained and funded by Offensive Security, a provider of world-class information security training and penetration testing services. In addition to Kali Linux, Offensive Security also maintains the Exploit Database and the free online course, Metasploit Unleashed.

Re:My thoughts - wtf is Kali Linux?

[p0p0]

The first 2 lines of your post led me to believe you were either going to write a poem or a rap. I was disappointed.

Re:My thoughts - wtf is Kali Linux?

[phantomfive]

Had we but world enough, and time,
This systemd, coder, were no crime.
We would sit down and think which way
To write init scripts our long love's day.

But at my back I always hear
Binary logging hurrying near;
And yonder all before us lie
Security exploits of vast eternity.

And your quaint boxen turn to dust,
And into ashes all my private keys:
The internet's a fine and public place,
But none, I think, should trust there systemds.

systemd is one reason not to use Debian.

[Anonymous Coward]

Maybe you haven't heard, but Debian switched to using systemd a little while ago. The results have been, how should we put it, not so good. Although unwanted by much of the Debian community, systemd was forced into use through political maneuvering. It was then forced through unstable and testing much too soon. Many long-time Debian users suffered from broken installations. Ever since it ended up in Debian 8, a supposed "stable" release, far too many people have experienced problems with it. Many of its problems actually can't be fixed; they're inherently broken by their very nature. Its use of binary logging is a perfect example of this. The only way to fix binary logging is to not use it at all.

Due to how disruptive systemd was to Debian, both politically and technically, the Debian community has been split. There is the small minority who pushed for the inclusion of systemd in the first place. A small number of fanatics went off and tried, unsuccessfully, to fork Debian in to the failed Devuan distro. Many other Debian users have chosen to move to other operating systems that offer greater stability and robustness, including FreeBSD, OpenBSD, OS X, and even Windows.

What was once the most talented and helpful Linux community has been shattered and fragmented. The most awful thing about this whole ordeal is that it wasn't Microsoft, or SCO, or anyone outside of the project that caused so much harm. It was a self-inflicted destruction! The greatest harm to Linux isn't some corporation; it's those within the community who wish to force problematic software like systemd upon all Linux users.