Slashdot Mirror


XKCD Author's New Unpublished Book Becomes Scientific Best-Seller

An anonymous reader writes: XKCD cartoonist Randall Munroe will be publishing a new book in November, but it's already become Amazon's #1 best-seller in two "Science & Math" subcategories, for mechanics and scientific instruments. Inspired by a cartoon describing NASA's Saturn V rocket as "the up-goer V", Randall's created a large-format collection of blueprints describing datacenters, tectonic plates, and even the controls in an airplane cockpit — using only the thousand most common English words. "Since this book explains things, I've called it Thing Explainer," Randall writes on the XKCD blog, trying to mimic the humorously simple style of his book. Randall's previous book of scientific hypotheticals — published one year ago — is still Amazon's #1 best-selling book in their "Physics" category, ranking higher than Stephen Hawking's "A Brief History of Time."

21 of 90 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds like a Star Trek book by russotto · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Technology for Pakleds" (they are smart)

    1. Re:Sounds like a Star Trek book by davester666 · · Score: 2

      They had their day...fifteen years ago.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  2. More practical.... by davidwr · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Most common 1000 words" is great for making a point.

    Far more practical would be using a vocabulary that almost all 10-year-old native speakers can read and that a vast majority of non-native speakers who have spent the last few years living in a English-speaking environment (that is, an environment that pretty much forces you to learn to speak and read English at a basic level in order to survive).

    I would expect this to be far more than 1000 words.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re: More practical.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you want to cultivate a positive image for science, you'll want to cultivate fans. They'll always outnumber the real scientists. The reason is rather simple: popularity -idealized- determines policy. So you want as many fans as possible for things concerning ecology (fossil fuels, global climatology), economy (less recessions, better investments, smarter spending savings debt management), immunology (Jenny McCartney is merely the tip of the festering social pus that is willful ignorance), technological advancements (take some time to compare what NASA is funded with per tax dollar vs. how much the solutions of space problems had saved in normal R&D when they release the data for free constantly without having pay patents). And so on.

      I agree with Maddox about how annoying fans are versus real science; but only someone blind cannot see the advantage of having popular (and populist) opinion in your corner.

    2. Re: More practical.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point is not to be practical, or to actually explain how these things work. The point is to be funny.

  3. indyrock by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    in a book format.

  4. Obligitory by Pikoro · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  5. Re:100, not 1000 by lgftsa · · Score: 3, Informative

    That would be "ten hundred" as it is written in the xkcd banner graphic.

  6. Re:100, not 1000 by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    100, not 1000

    Ten hundred, not the hundred.

    I made that mistake too, at first. I guess "thousand" isn't in the list (though I'm not sure which specific list he's using).

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  7. Re:Oh, fall off the planet by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's lots of high quality, popular stuff. xkcd isn't.

    That's your opinion and you're welcome to it - just remember that that's all it is. Something who enjoys something you don't like is not automatically worse than you for it.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  8. I thought it would be cool, but no by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Informative

    A book written in only a thousand words, I thought, would be cool for people learning English. But it's not. The whole thing is shot through with Millennial cultural references, so much as to make it incomprehensible. Hell, I can barely understand parts of the sample page. People who had different life experiences from the author as well as non-native English speakers will be totally lost. Sad, I had such high hopes.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:I thought it would be cool, but no by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
      I really don't get how two people moderated my comment "Troll". It is not a deliberate attempt at creating strife, it's what I thought when I read the sample. A book with only a thousand words, sounds great for teaching, right? But the sample is sorely lacking.

      WTF? Opinions that disagree with your opinions are not trolls, people.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  9. Re:Oh, fall off the planet by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's lots of high quality, popular stuff. xkcd isn't.

    "... but I won't go into detail about what that is, mainly because if you start liking it I'll have to find something even more obscure to like so I can maintain my superiority!"

    Nerd hipsterism is a sad thing to behold.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  10. Re:And what this tells us... by Goldsmith · · Score: 2

    I'm a pretty good scientist, and I enjoy xkcd.

    As a physicist, I don't expect the #1 book in "Physics" to be written by a professional physicist (although Randall has a physics degree and has worked a "physics" job). By definition, professional physicists don't specialize in mass market entertainment. Randall does specialize in entertainment, and I appreciate that he's using that expertise to write about science. If you don't like his approach, that's ok; there are other folks out there producing content about science differently.

  11. Re:And what this tells us... by CauseBy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't understand how the link supports what you say in your post. Whats absurd about saying that the new widespread availability of technology which can conclusively demonstrate tall tales, paired with the lack of such demonstrations, strongly implies that the tall tales were bullshit all along? That's the same reason we decided that Planet X doesn't exist, among countless other examples.

  12. Best seller means preorders, because NY Times by raymorris · · Score: 2

    What award? It's a best-seller for Amazon, which simply means that a lot of people bought it. Why get so many preorders before release? Because of the way the New York Times calculates their lists.

    To sell many copies of a book, it really helps to be on the New York Times best-seller list for a particular week. But to get on the list, you have to sell many copies in a week. The trick is that the Times counts sales when the books are DELIVERED, not when they are ordered. So what you do is pre-sell books for a long time prior to publication. The week the book is released, and orders are fulfilled, the Times counts allb of those preorders as sales for that one week that the book is actually released. Hopefully, that's enough to get on the Times best-seller list and all of the publicity associated with that.

    This is also why you'll see very attractive offers for preorders, things like "preorder my new book and you'll get the DVD, plus my last book, for free". They aren't trying to make money on preorders, they're trying to get enough preorders to get on the best- seller list for the week when they fulfill the preorders.

  13. Warning: bad pun by pjt33 · · Score: 2

    Donald Trump is going to win because money is everything in US politics: the only way to get ahead is toupee.

  14. Re:And what this tells us... by Cederic · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok, taking you seriously for a moment here: You've been double-bluffed.

    Randall knows that the methodology is flawed. He's posting it as a self-referential deconstruction of the methodology that led to false beliefs, intentionally using junk science to discredit non-science secure in the knowledge that his science savvy readers will understand this and admire the inherent contradiction in what he's posting.

    None of which detracts from the sheer common bloody sense insight that he's included for the benefit of those that missed the nuance above.

    Somehow you fell through the cracks. Perhaps you should read a different web comic.

  15. Re:Oh, fall off the planet by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

    XKCD is also much funnier if you read the text-over captions. And I've repeatedly found myself referring to specific XKCD cartoons in technical meetings, to explain the problem with someone's clever sounding approach. Examples from the last few months include:

                      Sudo make me a sandwich.
                      Universal connector box.
                      Standards.
                      ISO 8601.
                      Real programmers.
                      Workflow.

    Not everything is as good as those, but I've enjoyed them a great deal with children of my acquaintance.

  16. Re:100, not 1000^W^W^W^W^W^W^W^W^W^W^W by KGIII · · Score: 2

    Your penance is to use Windows 10 for 90 days - no dual booting and yes, that includes a phone. One more time and it is Bob.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  17. Re:And what this tells us... by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 2

    You can't fight reality. Randal has, in the past, said some pretty absurd stuff in his comics

    Einstein said some pretty absurd stuff in real life - much of which is still widely quoted. Like that "God doesn't play dice" thing.

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.