Slashdot Mirror


Mice Brainpower Boosted With Alteration of a Single Gene

Zothecula writes: By altering a single gene to inhibit the activity of an enzyme called phosphodiesterase (PDE4B), researchers have given mice the opportunity to see what an increase in intelligence is like. "They tended to learn faster, remember events longer and solve complex exercises better than ordinary mice. For example, the “brainy mice” showed a better ability than ordinary mice to recognize another mouse that they had been introduced to the day before (abstract). They were also quicker at learning the location of a hidden escape platform in a test called the Morris water maze. However, the PDE4B-inhibited mice also showed less recall of a fearful event after several days than ordinary mice." While many people would welcome such a treatment, the scientists say their research could lead to new treatments for those with cognitive disorders and age-related cognitive decline.

105 comments

  1. Zoink by future+assassin · · Score: 3, Funny

    n/t

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Zoink by savuporo · · Score: 1

      But can they play Brockian Ultra Cricket ?

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    2. Re:Zoink by delt0r · · Score: 1

      "I see now my plan has a fatal flaw.", is then squashed by the gold bar.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
  2. I would laugh so hard... by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would laugh so hard if they develop a drug based on this and the only skills that people gain are the ability to recognize mice better and to be less scared of open spaces and cats. Oh and to find hidden escape ways.

    But really I do look forward to what will happen someday if these cognitive enhancement drugs turn out to be safe and make people smarter. I am not talking a limitless sort of thing but what happens if a university course ends up be retuned to be just too difficult for most people unless they are taking these sorts of things? If that hasn't already happened with things like Modafinil.

    1. Re:I would laugh so hard... by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Has me wondering about the result of changing the married gene.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    2. Re:I would laugh so hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is the hidden cost or mice allready would be smarter?

    3. Re:I would laugh so hard... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      TFS:

      However, the PDE4B-inhibited mice also showed less recall of a fearful event after several days than ordinary mice

      That would imply the mice have trouble learning not to play with cats. Not good for continued species survival.

    4. Re:I would laugh so hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it would be handy to remember which stores have the best quality sharp cheese

    5. Re:I would laugh so hard... by Sowelu · · Score: 2

      I dunno--in modern society, things that seem viscerally scary are often important or necessary (nuclear power, say) and things that seem reasonable at first glance can be dangerous. Losing instinctive fear and replacing it with cold rationality seems like an improvement for species survival, depending on what you think the nastiest Great Filter is.

    6. Re:I would laugh so hard... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I would laugh so hard if they develop a drug based on this and the only skills that people gain are the ability to recognize mice better and to be less scared of open spaces and cats.

      You won't be laughing when this guy shows up:

      https://triviahappy.com/wp-con...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:I would laugh so hard... by dissy · · Score: 1

      I just hope they don't enslave us and force us to watch The Secret of NIMH 2
      *shudder*

    8. Re:I would laugh so hard... by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      cold rationality is only going to work if you really understand what you're experiencing. When it comes to predators, you need to be able to think from their point of view. So far it's only known that humans can do that (and possibly our ancestors), and it's what gave us the advantage over everything else a few hundred thousand to a few million years ago. Being able to realise your smell, the sounds you make and your tracks are what your opponent are using to track you and using that knowledge to deliberately mislead them is not a simple task.

      I doubt the cognitive abilities of a mouse are really that advanced.

    9. Re:I would laugh so hard... by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Losing instinctive fear and replacing it with cold rationality seems like an improvement for species survival

      It's fine in the short run, but in the long run you're screwed.

    10. Re:I would laugh so hard... by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1
    11. Re:I would laugh so hard... by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      TFS:

      However, the PDE4B-inhibited mice also showed less recall of a fearful event after several days than ordinary mice

      That would imply the mice have trouble learning not to play with cats. Not good for continued species survival.

      It seems like it's not "smarter" it's "more optimistic."

      If you are a mouse, making a mistake is often your last one. There's going to be lots of stuff in mouse behavior that makes them not do stuff that might be a mistake but also might be a benefit because the benefit is food, sex, or water or something and the mistake is death.

      It might be an interesting data point to find out how humans with this gene behave verses ones that done have that gene.

    12. Re:I would laugh so hard... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's not fear of the technology itself, it's fear of it being spread in a way that increases inequality. In other words, fear of human nature.

      If such a drug is developed, it will be expensive. Only people who already have a big advantage in education will be able to afford it. That will further increase the inequality with people who cannot afford it, creating social problems. It is already happening to an extent, with existing cognitive enhancing drugs, so it's not an unfounded fear.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:I would laugh so hard... by dkman · · Score: 1

      Is it just "less fear" or is it reduced inhibitions, period? Neither would have great results in people in general.

      But I thought of Ceasar, and Rise of the Planet of the Apes.

      --
      I refuse to sign
    14. Re:I would laugh so hard... by doccus · · Score: 1

      what is the hidden cost or mice allready would be smarter?

      They'll start to think they're rats. And that's about all. Mice will never rule the world. Mice are significantly stupider than rats. If they did this same gene alteration to rats, however, we'd have an epidemic of technically proficient rats on our hands. OTOH, think of the market potential for used 3.5" iPhones!

    15. Re:I would laugh so hard... by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Being able to realise your smell, the sounds you make and your tracks are what your opponent are using to track you and using that knowledge to deliberately mislead them is not a simple task.

      I doubt the cognitive abilities of a mouse are really that advanced.

      Probably not something that a mouse does, but these are exactly the things that a fox will do when trying to outsmart the dogs chasing him. Coyotes do things with their tracks that confuse people or dogs chasing them also. It can't be too advanced of a thought process if there are already natural animals that make use of it.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  3. Life expectancy by devslash0 · · Score: 1

    What about the life span? Is it affected by this gene alteration?

    1. Re:Life expectancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't last that long. Stupid mice. Still got their brain dissected.

  4. Damn.... by mark-t · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now the theme to Pinky and the Brain is stuck in my head. Even less conducive to getting work done than reading Slashdot.

    And just now my coworker next to me just asked why I whispered "Narf".

    1. Re:Damn.... by DreamMaster · · Score: 1

      I also chuckled at the classic literary reference in the article title.. "from the mice-of-nimh dept" :)

    2. Re:Damn.... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Of Mice and Men?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:Damn.... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Apologies, I was thinking of the very next comment, Flowers From Algernon.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  5. Flowers FROM Algernon? by grasshoppa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How smart are we talking here?

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Flowers FROM Algernon? by thatseattleguy · · Score: 2

      My thought exactly; you beat me to it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...

    2. Re:Flowers FROM Algernon? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Dammit, I was going to ask if one of the mice was named Algernon.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Flowers FROM Algernon? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 4, Funny

      The mouse was the Slashdot submitter.

    4. Re:Flowers FROM Algernon? by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Bravo sir.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    5. Re:Flowers FROM Algernon? by jlowery · · Score: 1

      ...and you call that "smart"?

      --
      If you post it, they will read.
    6. Re:Flowers FROM Algernon? by BryanL · · Score: 1

      "The mouse was the Slashdot submitter."

      So...not very. At least s/he was smarter than a SD editor.

    7. Re: Flowers FROM Algernon? by howe.chris · · Score: 1

      You just pulled a Charlie Gordan

  6. Methuselah Syndrome by Strange+Quark+Star · · Score: 1

    The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long -- and they burn so very, very brightly.

    --
    There is no sig.
    1. Re:Methuselah Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You callin' Methuselah stoopid? You must be a geeyou hatin' terrerist.

    2. Re:Methuselah Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's better burn out than to fade away.

    3. Re:Methuselah Syndrome by Strange+Quark+Star · · Score: 1

      There can be only one!

      --
      There is no sig.
    4. Re: Methuselah Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's better to burn on your feet than fade on your knees!

  7. Super-Race of Humans Next by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    To be competitive, I'm pretty sure certain nations would allow and/or require adjusting human brain genetics to breed a "super race" with superior intelligence, memory, and/or discipline.

    I don't know how long a nation that forbids such could compete. If the super-brain nations become a threat, the hold-outs will be forced to tinker also.

    1. Re:Super-Race of Humans Next by timrod · · Score: 1

      I think what you just described is the origin story for the Space Marines in Warhammer 40,000.

    2. Re:Super-Race of Humans Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... to breed a "super race" ...

      There's no good ending here: From 'Dark angel' and 'ST: The wrath of Khan', the first use of eugenics is the super-soldier. In the Star trek universe, World War 3 was caused by genetic engineering.

      The almost good side is 'Brave new world', where eugenics makes people a perfect fit in the world; a world where no-one objects to cheap drugs, casual sex, minimum responsibility, child-free towns or being told what to think. Actually, the evening news started telling me what to think 6 months ago: I'm missing the cheap drugs and casual sex though.

    3. Re:Super-Race of Humans Next by bughunter · · Score: 1

      You're right. Somebody is going to try this. And a lot of people will loudly object.

      But depending on how it turns out, everybody else will also.

      And the result will be a caste society, with the fearless, superintelligent transhumans ruling the masses of those with random genotypes.

      Our only hope is that, if performed on humans, it produces some crippling side effect, like the inability to use language.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    4. Re:Super-Race of Humans Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be competitive, I'm pretty sure certain nations would allow and/or require adjusting human brain genetics to breed a "super race" with superior intelligence, memory, and/or discipline.

      only if there republicin capitalistocracies. deomocrat socioligarchys will doo the opppizit. guess were I live?

    5. Re: Super-Race of Humans Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever notice how the intelligent, well-educated people have no kids, while the ghetto rats multiply like rabbits? Or how the first-world nations either suffer population loss (Germany, Russia) or barely sustain a population (USA, France), while third-world hellholes send waves of "asylum seekers" to colonize the first world?
      A race of super-smart humans would probably Darwin itself into oblivion chasing career dreams instead of having kids, or they'd all go Conchita Wurst and become trannies.

    6. Re:Super-Race of Humans Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on how great an increase 'over-all' is required we already live in such a world... It's not nations but races... Oh we like to say it isn't so, but it is... 'generally'

    7. Re:Super-Race of Humans Next by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      We've been racing towards a brave new world at full speed for quite a while now. Some say we're only 20 years away from artificial wombs. I think that's when the real fun begins.

    8. Re:Super-Race of Humans Next by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It's really difficult to test such in a controlled way. Social factors are very difficult to tease out of the data. You'd practically have to clone nations and watch for several decades. Only God has those kinds of resources.

    9. Re:Super-Race of Humans Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then the super-brain nations will go to live in space
      And then they and the Earthlings will fight with giant robots

    10. Re:Super-Race of Humans Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moeagare
      Moeagare
      Moeaagre GANDAMU!
      Kimi yo hashire
      Mada ikari ni moeru
      Toshi ga aru nara
      Kyodai na teki o
      Uteyo, uteyo, uteyo
      Seigi no ikari o
      Butsukero GANDAMU
      Kido senshi [2] GANDAMU! GANDAMU!

      Tachiagare
      Tachiagare
      Tachiagare GANDAMU!
      Kimi yo sakebe
      Mada zetsubo ni shizumu
      Kanashii aru nara
      Kyofu o haratte
      Ikeyo, ikeyo, ikeyo
      Uzumaku chishio o
      Motase GANDAMU![1]
      Kido senshi GANDAMU! GANDAMU!

      Yomigaeru
      Yomigaeru
      Yomigaeru GANDAMU!
      Kimi yo tsukame
      Mada ai ni furueru
      Kokoro ga aru nara
      Heiwa o motomete
      Tobeyo, tobeyo, tobeyo
      Ginga e mukatte
      Tobeyo GANDAMU
      Kido senshi GANDAMU! GANDAMU!

    11. Re:Super-Race of Humans Next by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Yoh Mah Mah

  8. I, for one, welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Our new 3D maze-acing, housecat-belling, mousetrap-defying, while getting the cheese anyway, blindfold chessplaying rodent Overlords.

    1. Re:I, for one, welcome by Megane · · Score: 2

      Of course they're our overlords, they built this planet to solve the Ultimate Question, or at least to solve it with a better answer than "forty-two".

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re: I, for one, welcome by GrantRobertson · · Score: 1

      No. They built the planet to find out the question, to which the answer is 42.

  9. commentsubjectsaredumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >While many people would welcome such a treatment, the scientists say their research could lead to new treatments for those with access to bloated insurance troughs

    Imagine a miracle wonder-drug snake oil that boosted things like risk-analysis, productivity, motivation, organizational ability, etcetcetc, and yes, intelligence. A drug that could shoot any country to a new tier of prosperity, any currency to absolute dominance.

    It'd spend ten years tied up in patent courtrooms over who owns the formula. It'd spend the next ten available exclusively to hospitals and the DOD.

    1. Re:commentsubjectsaredumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, somebody would steal it, leak it or reverse engineer it and flood the black market

  10. nimh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was the lab NIMH by any chance?

  11. Flowers for Algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come to life. This is the first thing that went through my head besides Wrath of Khan eugenics type applications.

  12. Loss of memory, or just loss of fear? by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    However, the PDE4B-inhibited mice also showed less recall of a fearful event after several days than ordinary mice.

    Perhaps being smarter enabled them to process the "fearful event", determine the cause of the fear, the amount of actual hazard and any risk mitigation actions they could take, and thus not be as "afeard" the next time that event happened?

    That's what humans do. They get scared by something, realize that the fright was temporary and not based on an actual threat, and desensitize.

    And my fist thought was "Flowers For Algernon", too.

  13. Narf! by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 2

    n/t

    --
    the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    1. Re:Narf! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      "Wuh, I think so, Brain, but burlap chafes me so."

      Ahhh ... Pinky

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  14. Package in a retrovirus by Etherwalk · · Score: 2

    Package it in a retrovirus and pass it around. And maybe we can use it to make an STD that will make people smarter. Stop being so damn conservative that you only use it on people with cognitive problems if society as a whole could benefit from fewer stupid people.

    1. Re:Package in a retrovirus by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Stop being so damn conservative that you only use it on people with cognitive problems if society as a whole could benefit from fewer stupid people.

      They who you gonna get to work at Wal-Mart? For that matter, who you gonna get to shop at Wal-Mart?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Package in a retrovirus by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4

      'Stupid' is not just a matter of low intelligence. It's also a subject of cognitive biases and undisciplined thinking.

      For a good example, look at Ben Carson, one of the Republican candidates. He has spouted a steam of policy positions that most people would regard as stupid: He suggested abolishing all taxes in favor of a fixed 10% income 'tithe' because that is what the bible specifies, he said that homosexuality must be a choice because people turn gay in prison, and he has claimed that the affordable care act enslaves people to the government. But is he stupid? Certainly not: Before going into politics he was a neurosurgeon, and a very good one too, one actively involved in research and responsible for developing new procedures. He is literally a brain surgeon.

      What Carson shows is that it's quite possible for a person to be of brilliant intelligence, but still come to hold positions that are quite obviously ridiculous. Humans are not logical creatures by nature: Their minds are the product of a process that optimized for reproductive success. A cobbled-together tangle of heuristics.

    3. Re: Package in a retrovirus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The idea that homosexuality has one and only one cause (either biology or choice) is silly. Most complex human behaviors have many inputs, and sexuality is very complex. The desire to reduce human sexuality to choice or biology is a desire to make a moral issue out of it or remove it from moral consideration, but not a desire to explain what is going on inside a person. If you believe that no one is predisposed to homosexuality but rather homosexuals all consciously choose to engage in homosexual acts, or if you believe that no one ever makes the choice, you're just as wrong as someone who believes the polar opposite of you. Human desires do not so evenly divide into a binary set.

    4. Re:Package in a retrovirus by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      One could also argue that while those positions are utterly stupid, if enough people will vote for you based on your espousal of those positions than it's also highly intelligent to pay them lip service. Given that we're in the realm of politics, one could also make all manner of other arguments that normally shouldn't be plausible or worthy of much thought, but are within the realm of probability.

      It also goes without saying that most every individual is likely to hold some position or behave in some manner that is irrational. I'm not terribly familiar with his platform, so I really can't provide comment much beyond what you've stated. However, it seems incredibly off for a neurosurgeon to believe that homosexuality is a choice when a growing amount of science has pointed in the other direction ever since Simon LeVay's work in the early 90's. I don't know if he's also deeply religious and just looking for excuses to calm the dissonance or something else along those lines, but the facts as I understand them do not make sense.

    5. Re:Package in a retrovirus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Retrovirus is exactly what we need.
      Unfortunatly nobody knows how to do that yet without killing the host or birth defecting its offspring lineage.

    6. Re:Package in a retrovirus by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Just look at what SuricouRaven implies:

      .

      You are proving his point. You make fucking ridiculous long debunked claims, that normal people would howl at, but are smart enough to post as Anonymous Coward so we do't have a name to laugh at.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re: Package in a retrovirus by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The idea that homosexuality has one and only one cause (either biology or choice) is silly. Most complex human behaviors have many inputs, and sexuality is very complex.

      The idea that it is a choice is just plain silly. I noticed about the time I hit puberty tht I found a certain reaction to long legged women, tall with a nice backside, and with long hair, and not large breasts. I never woke up one day and said "Hey - I think I'll go for tall, leggy women with nice asses, long legs, lonf hair and small tits." I kinda noticed because of reactions my own personal body had when seeing one. And not the obvious one, but just a heightened interest, and a greater enjoyment in looking at her. No choice at all - just what I like.

      I have no idea why that would not be true for homosexual or bisexuals.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re: Package in a retrovirus by Mr.CRC · · Score: 1

      Late bloomer. That started for me in kindergarten.

    9. Re:Package in a retrovirus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds smart, but is it wise?

    10. Re: Package in a retrovirus by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      A friend once told me of a conversation he had with his dad:

      Dad: "When did you decide you were going to be gay?"
      Him: "When did you decide you were going to be straight?" ...

      If you were expecting more after that build-up, I'm happy to disappoint. I think the point is made.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    11. Re:Package in a retrovirus by blue9steel · · Score: 2

      I can tell that you never played D&D or you'd know the difference between wisdom and intelligence.

    12. Re:Package in a retrovirus by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Package it in a retrovirus and pass it around. And maybe we can use it to make an STD that will make people smarter. Stop being so damn conservative that you only use it on people with cognitive problems if society as a whole could benefit from fewer stupid people.

      Genomes are usually well balanced and it is difficult to globally "improve" healthy people with a single mutation without causing nasty side effects. If altering a single gene is the solution, evolution would likely have done it already. Illnesses are different : they are usually caused by an undesirable mutation at some point and the idea is just to revert the damage. Engineering resistance to a specific toxin or disease (like GMO crops) is also a different matter : this is a specific improvement, and it often result in a decrease of performance in the general case.
      That's why studies are often more about curing illnesses than improving healthy people.

  15. Re:Can we by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    You may think Obama isn't very smart, but he's smarter than the average American.

  16. Already done in humans for COPD. by sims+2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://lungdiseasenews.com/201...

    "Roflumilast works by inhibiting the activity of an enzyme called phosphodiesterase 4B (PDE4B)"

    Maybe someone who's using it can tell us the side effects in humans.

    Its also known by its commercial name Daliresp.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    1. Re:Already done in humans for COPD. by reboot246 · · Score: 3, Informative

      A better known and safer alternative is resveratrol. You can try taking supplements which may or may not work, or just drink the red wine.

      Resveratrol is an exceptional PDE-4 inhibitor. One supplement that has been thoroughly tested and found effective is Longevinex.

    2. Re:Already done in humans for COPD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a number of drugs that work by inhibiting phosphodiesterase activity... and they are all patented and well protected.
      First major drug that targeted PDE's was Viagra. Which is PDE5, a very close isoform to PDE4B, and probably has some cross reactivity, which is why people see blue, have heart issues and all the other issues. We have PDE's in our eyes, blood vessels, brain, they are every place that there is cAMP and cGMP signaling. I worked on PDE10 and PDE 11 isoforms, from another species, as putative targets for cognitive impairment and we used a similar mouse models.

      What is interesting about this study is they target DISC1 binding implicity, and design around that, as opposed to the old school methods of screening a bunch of library compounds against enzyme extracts in cGMP and cAMP activity assays via HTS. Kudos to them for finding a short cut to the new erectile dysfunction pill... that also might make you smart enough not to use it, but you are probably already drunk by the time you do take it, so it is probably a wash.

      C'est le vie, so ist das leben, whatever.

    3. Re:Already done in humans for COPD. by strikethree · · Score: 1

      A better known and safer alternative is resveratrol. You can try taking supplements which may or may not work, or just drink the red wine.

      Resveratrol is an exceptional PDE-4 inhibitor. One supplement that has been thoroughly tested and found effective is Longevinex.

      The best alternative that I have found is the wonder drug called fuckitol. It is a stress reduction serum that dramatically lowers the levels of cortisol in your body.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  17. The Rats (and mice) of NIMH... by pkuyken · · Score: 1

    Anyone else get the feeling that life is imitating art here? Who would have thought that The Secret of NIMH was prophetic.... Soon we shall all bow down to our rodent overlords.

    1. Re:The Rats (and mice) of NIMH... by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Anyone else get the feeling that life is imitating art here? Who would have thought that The Secret of NIMH was prophetic....

      I think most mice have switched to Lithium Ion now.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  18. Could this also relate to human intelligence? by GerryGilmore · · Score: 1

    Think about it. We are genetically extremely close to other primates, yet we have evolved a much higher level of intelligence. This type of mutation, which could easily occur during the natural evolutionary process, could be the cause of our differentiation.

    1. Re:Could this also relate to human intelligence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, shitlord. Unlike other animals, all humans have exactly the same intelligence and it has absolutely nothing to do with fascist things like genetics. ;)

  19. Narf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Zort POIT!

  20. For People Now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we just recode this gene into peeple now? Maybe they will stop being stupid...

  21. When the mice start building Deep Thought... by rwyoder · · Score: 1

    ...then I'll be impressed.

    1. Re:When the mice start building Deep Thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mice are vastly hyperintelligent pandimensional beings. They are Deep Thought!

  22. short term versus long term by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like they boosted short term memory and processing at the expense of long term memory. The tiny mouse brains destroyed the older memories in favor of the new ones at a quicker rate than with normal mice.

    1. Re:short term versus long term by Jumunquo · · Score: 3, Funny

      So it works better than alcohol!

  23. Old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our super intelligent rodent overlords.

  24. Re:Democrats by hackwrench · · Score: 2

    It's not just the Democrats, all of the rich and powerful keep all the real decision making away from those who are not, and we keep letting them. The window dressing is just different, that's all.

  25. Re:Logical by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Just because someone starts with different axioms doesn't mean they're not logical.

  26. Science would beg to disagree by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    Maybe, but we're working on it pretty hard, and in the meantime we could always just add it to an existing STD.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  27. Wouldn't that mean "brain power" is a function by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of genes? Isn't this a nono?

  28. Re:Logical by Mr.CRC · · Score: 1

    It's not clear that people start with any consistent set of axioms at all. And inherent logical contradictions run rampant. The brain is not logical. It's inductive. It's designed to come to a decision, any decision, which is usually better than a detailed and disciplined logical analysis when it comes to avoiding becoming a meal.

  29. intellegent currency? by khallow · · Score: 1

    any currency to absolute dominance.

    My dollar bills are smarter than your dollar bills?

  30. C'mon by mhoenicka · · Score: 0

    We've been inhibiting our phosphodiesterases for ages - the miracle wonder drug is called coffee. No genetic modification required.

  31. Re:Can we by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    And he swiped my pic-a-nic basket.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  32. Re:Logical by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Inductive logic is a thing.

  33. worst of both worlds by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    You can have amazing intellect but shitty memory.

    So that cold fusion device you built five minutes ago? Yes, you know, the one you can't even remember building, never mind how to switch it on?

    Life's a bitch.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  34. beware the vending machine in the breakroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that's what they're putting in those energy drinks?

  35. experiments done with "normal" mice but... by Lategamereview · · Score: 1

    Would love to see the results with Mice that have mental disorder or shows mental disorder.

  36. Energy bottleneck by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Usually, the bottleneck associated with bigger brain isn't lifespan, but energy expenditure.

    Bigger brain eat up more energy and that must be balanced regarding cost/benefit.
    - How much more food would an animal X find with the bigger brain vs. how much more food would the animal need to eat to sustain this brain ?

    "bigger brain" mutation don't happen that much in the wild, and usually are being done by labs partly for this reason:
    because lab mice are guaranteed to receive suffisient food and not starve.

    humans are a bit of an exception in the animal kingdom:
    we have co-evolved our brains together with our tool-usage and society and civilisation.
    in modern civilisation we have access to much more food (too much if you look at the obesity tendency in the western world).
    to the point that the bottleneck isn't the energy anymore.

    Thus, contrary to other animals, and thanks to agriculture, crops growing, food preservation techniques, cooking, etc.. human can afford having a brain whose gluttonous baseline energy consumption is around 20% of the whole body.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]