Slashdot Mirror


Meet YouTube Gaming, Twitch's Archenemy

An anonymous reader writes: As expected Google has launched its answer to Twitch, YouTube Gaming available on the web, Android and iOS. Techcrunch reports: "We played with the Android app before the launch, and here's how it works. When you open the app, you are presented with a search bar at the top, a few featured channels at the top and then a feed of the most popular channels. The current featured channels don't focus on esports like most Twitch channels. Right now, you can find a 12-hour stream of NBA 2K15, and official stream of Metal Gear Solid V, a speed run of Until Dawn and an Eve Online live show."

94 comments

  1. Do not want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just buy the game on DVD.

  2. I'm probably way too old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but this sounds like the most boring thing ever...

    1. Re: I'm probably way too old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to watch game reviews and live feeds that are how to guides. I did watch some international DOTA2 games last year and it was kind of interesting, as much as watching any other game on TV.

    2. Re:I'm probably way too old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's no worse than televised sports.

      The snore factor of the average NFL game is off the charts. It's like watching someone play Tetris. Unless they can do something utterly spectacular, and finish within a minute or two, it's not worth it. The game is a "solved problem", in that there's not really any plays in NFL football that everyone who has ever watched a game doesn't already know the counter to. It's like a really dull turn-based RPG fight.

      Then there's baseball. Ugh. They're only now going to start pushing a game to keep moving at something faster than a snail's pace. They've been a professional league for over 100 years (in one form or another). It's been televised for over 50 years. Now, you're gonna introduce a pitch clock? Damn but that's just not good enough.

      And then there's golf, which everyone readily agrees is the best white noise generator for sleeping peacefully through a Saturday afternoon.

      Meanwhile, some of the Summer Games Done Quick stuff was not only interesting, but rather fun and upbeat. Big Jon is always entertaining. The Metroid and Mega Man races are never a disappointment (at least for the guys that finish). And the lesser known runs are usually at least somewhat interesting for their technicality. And if you're into a more "social" experience, they keep the chatter going through the long-ass JRPG's and keep things entertaining. And that's just one event on Twitch. I'm sure there are lots of sleepy, dull channels, but due to the internet's fickle nature, I'm sure they don't float to the top very often.

      As for YouTube Gaming, I don't give it much of a chance. I'd say 25% chance it competes properly with Twitch, and about a 60% chance of it going the way of Google+. That leaves a quite-slim 15% chance of anything else, including, but not limited to, dethroning Twitch.

    3. Re:I'm probably way too old by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Go to Youtube and look up "vanossgaming" some time.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:I'm probably way too old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In baseball you used to see pitch courts used more often and more switching out of pitchers.

      basketball has the hack a shaq.

      Now what about games with no time limit where a pro can take a long time doing the same low risk / low scoring move over and over. Or games with suicide 1 ups where you can play the same stage / level / map over and over with no real risk?

      Games Done Quick is cool but for not for games where your score says who wins or stuff like city builders where it's about all kind of stuff just look at the sim city 4 mods and there citys.

    5. Re:I'm probably way too old by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      As for YouTube Gaming, I don't give it much of a chance. I'd say 25% chance it competes properly with Twitch, and about a 60% chance of it going the way of Google+. That leaves a quite-slim 15% chance of anything else, including, but not limited to, dethroning Twitch.

      Or being an also-ran like Hitbox...

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    6. Re:I'm probably way too old by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's like Twitch, so yes. Sometimes those gaming videos are fun to watch for some unknown reason, and I find myself watching them. Some of it is a sneak peak, as in seeing if the game is worth $60 becuase you can never trust marketing or even word of mouth (because even your best friends will never have the same tastes you do). Some of it is watching someone screw up. Sometimes someone has a different strategy than you do and it's interesting. Or it's just funny (witness Felicia and Ryan Day playing games against each other). Generally the person playing the game needs to TALK, it can't just be game playing as that's boring. A game tournament (aka esports but without the idiocy of using the word "sports") would be terribly boring I think, but some of the speed runs I've seen are fun just from seeing the tricks and strictly-legal cheats being employed.

      As far as the new youtube thing, it's overblown. Just another way to search for videos.

    7. Re:I'm probably way too old by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

      Imagine Twitch, only with YouTube commenters in the chat.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  3. OMG!!! by sims+2 · · Score: 2

    It has a search function!!! Thats amazing!!!

    Twitch has been doing this for years why have they never thought of that??

    (Amazon owns Twitch yet fire tv has no search in twitch app)

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    1. Re:OMG!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you on about? Both the Twitch site and the app has a search feature for both games and streamers

    2. Re:OMG!!! by Sez+Zero · · Score: 1

      He's probably doing this thing called "sarcasm".

    3. Re:OMG!!! by sims+2 · · Score: 2

      Check out this amazon review of the fire tv version of twitch:
      http://www.amazon.com/gp/custo...

      There is no search which is odd considering twitch is owned by amazon.

      Why cripple your own app? It works fine on the roku and roku Doesn't own twitch.

      Please prove me wrong.

      Seriously I would like to be able to search twitch on my fire tv.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    4. Re:OMG!!! by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      Check out this amazon review of the fire tv version of twitch:
      http://www.amazon.com/gp/custo...

      There is no search which is odd considering twitch is owned by amazon.

      Why cripple your own app? It works fine on the roku and roku Doesn't own twitch.

      Please prove me wrong.

      Seriously I would like to be able to search twitch on my fire tv.

      who said anything about crippling? Silly people have this silly notion that corporations are less silly.

      Who's sillier? The 'silly', or the 'silly' that 'sillies'...wait,what?

      oh yeah, the Fire Phone. It had 4 cameras to... do silly things. Silly people at the top really have no freaking clue what silly people at the bottom do.

      My point: statistically, attribute more to stupidity than malice.

  4. It's like spectator sports by paul_metcalfe · · Score: 2

    It's like spectator sports, but the audience may also be a player of the game.

    I never got the appeal of spectator sports but I do like to watch someone skilled play a game, so that I can learn from it and become better myself.

    Although frankly, I prefer watching stuff that's pre-recorded so I can skip through boring and mundane bits. At the cost of not being able to interact with the broadcaster. But let's face it, that never really happens in the really popular channels anyway, you just get drowned in the flood of chat, and the chat ends up being ignored by the player, and there is only conversation between spectators.

    --
    Always read at -1, don't let others decide what you should and should not read.
    1. Re:It's like spectator sports by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      It's like spectator sports, but the audience may also be a player of the game.

      Agreed. There is one streamer I follow on Twitch and he will get all of his followers together on one server or get them on a public server and play as a team. I have done that several times....watch for awhile, join the server he is on and play along for awhile, then go back to watching. Pretty fun!

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
  5. 404 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://gaming.youtube.com

    404

    "Lorem ipsum other castle, arrow to the knee set up us the bomb."

    Excellent.

    1. Re:404 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that’s the only real page that’s working for me in Pale Moon.

      On a chrome based browser it loads then randomly freezes.

  6. For watching other people's game, not your own by Aero77 · · Score: 2

    Its a spectator sport, like watching someone play games at the arcade. Also useful for seeing how the game plays if you are considering purchasing it.

  7. How long will this last? by dysmal · · Score: 0

    This is Google trying something new. I give it 18 months before they kill it officially (which is 14 months after everyone abandons it because of the forced integration to G+ that we know is coming).

    1. Re:How long will this last? by mattventura · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's already horrible, I tried it this morning. I made an account. It wanted my real name (used a fake one of course), needed to verify my phone number, and had to create a whole YouTube channel (which was difficult due to a faulty redirect) just to be able to choose my display name. And of course, it automatically makes a g+ page for your YouTube channel, because why not. Overall it was an awful experience. They don't even tell you what you need to do, they just let you figure it out on your own and hope you already have a conception of how yt/google accounts work. Oh, and all of this was just to be able to use the chat, nothing else.

    2. Re:How long will this last? by maugle · · Score: 1

      I miss the old Google. The one that did things besides buy or blindly copy somebody else's work.

    3. Re:How long will this last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to clarify, I don't think there are any extra steps if you already have a YT account. I went straight to YTG and I was already logged in on my fake name account.

      BTW, the YTG service itself is great compared to twitch. YTG seems to have much better quality and lower bandwidth usage on terrible internet connections like my own. I can easily do 720p60 whereas on twitch, I'm limited to watching the popular streams since only those provide custom stream quality settings.

  8. Copyright in game streams by tepples · · Score: 1

    A video game is a copyrighted audiovisual work, and streaming a video game without permission from the game's publisher is copyright infringement. How do Twitch and YouTube Gaming either obtain this permission or provide a means for members to apply to publishers to obtain this permission?

    1. Re:Copyright in game streams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ContentID. IF a game company feels they own that property, they tell Google/Twitch 'hey thats mine' and take all monetization revenue from it. Its win win for them. No work, no effort, just easy money.

    2. Re:Copyright in game streams by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      It's free advertising that has amazing marketing data generation, and customer interaction levels on par with the Victoria's Secret fashion show they televise every year. If they don't already directly address copyright issues in their EULA now, they will soon. All of the major publishing houses have been promoting e-sports for a while and there have been close to zero takedowns based on game streaming.
       
      I see the potential for conflict here, but in the last four years it has been a non-issue, and Google's army of lawyers have vetted the project so I'm reasonably sure they're in the clear here for all but the smallest/out of touch developers.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:Copyright in game streams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And short of getting sued out of existence, there's not much either company can do. But I'm pretty sure these gaming companies will soon realize that if they stop the revenue stream to streamers, they're going to get less streams, and they're going to make much less money off of their actual product. I think indie game companies certainly realize this. I also think game companies getting a small cut of the profits isn't out of the question either.

    4. Re:Copyright in game streams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thought provoking comment. So you are suggesting that if 30 years ago, a friend takes a picture of me playing a stand-up coin-op arcade game, then publishes that in a school newspaper, they are guilty of copyright violation? Ok.

    5. Re:Copyright in game streams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shit, it gets better. So you are suggesting that everyone using (with consent) desktop screen sharing applications (vnc, teamviewer, etc) has been guilty of massive numbers of copyright violations against all of the software that happened to be displayed on the screen at the time? Ok.

    6. Re:Copyright in game streams by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      That is one lawyers opinion, there is no legal precedent of this, and I would argue that the only legal precedent that exists is the one cited in the article, Allen v. Academic Games League of America. The playing of board games and video games are fundamentally similar that I believe that precedent would stand if a court case were filed.

    7. Re:Copyright in game streams by paul_metcalfe · · Score: 1

      Most companies don't actually have a problem with streamers as it's free advertising for their games. Although if it's negative they may use this angle to try to censor. Which can lead to the Streisand effect.

      ContentID sometimes still triggers on the background music in some games.

      --
      Always read at -1, don't let others decide what you should and should not read.
    8. Re:Copyright in game streams by tepples · · Score: 1

      A single frame is far more likely to favor the alleged infringer under the "amount and substantiality" factor of fair use than a playthrough of an entire level or, worse yet, a whole game.

    9. Re:Copyright in game streams by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      A video game is a copyrighted audiovisual work, and streaming a video game without permission from the game's publisher is copyright infringement

      Is it now? Thats "one" persons opinion. You are way way way to literal on things like this.

      How do Twitch and YouTube Gaming either obtain this permission or provide a means for members to apply to publishers to obtain this permission?

      They don't need to?

      Look, the only company that really doesn't care for streaming is Nintendo, goes to show just how stuck in the past they are. Streaming is built right in to the PS4 and Xbox One.

  9. Holy crap by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    That website is so bandwidth and CPU intensive that I thought it was a black empty page for nearly ten seconds.

    1. Re:Holy crap by farble1670 · · Score: 2

      enjoy the pure HTML5 experience you've all been clambering for. oh wait, you mean HTML5 didn't turn out to magically efficient?!

    2. Re:Holy crap by zenbi · · Score: 1

      I can't stand the lack of scroll bar on the webpage. They covered the normal scrollbar area with avatar circles and made it impossible to actually click on the scroll bar to scroll. Hope you have a scroll wheel on your mouse!

    3. Re:Holy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. What's worse is that after I logged in, if gave me a 404 error page.

    4. Re:Holy crap by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Flash is even more CPU-intensive.

    5. Re:Holy crap by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Glad I wasn't the only one to have that problem.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    6. Re:Holy crap by wasteoid · · Score: 1

      it's magically DELICIOUS! That's what we wanted from HTML5.

    7. Re:Holy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to invest in a keyboard. It has those nifty things called arrow keys.

    8. Re:Holy crap by citizenr · · Score: 1

      It IS a black empty page in older browsers (Opera 12.xx). Looking at the html this website has empty body element, its all garbage javascript the way google wants all the web to look like.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    9. Re:Holy crap by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Well no wonder my browser froze up trying to load that crap. I bet everybody at Google only has the latest hardware and doesn't care about optimization.

    10. Re:Holy crap by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I have a scroll bar that the avatar circles don't cover, but if I move over to the scrollbar, a channels sidebar pops over with ANOTHER scrollbar just for it.

    11. Re:Holy crap by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      maybe. references?

    12. Re:Holy crap by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Reference: anything that's not Microsoft Windows.

    13. Re:Holy crap by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      seriously, can you point me to any benchmarks that show flash is faster, more efficient?
      when i google for this, the first three links show flash is ~2x better than HTML5 is animation and video.

  10. Bad name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will company's start to realize that product name means something? Youtube Gaming just sounds like what it is: a cheap me-too attempt at an established company trying to break into a niche market. One of the first questions marketing really needs to ask is how people are going to reference the service in real life. I can't imagine anyone going "Dude, you have to check out xxyomgsexygamergirl's latest video on Youtube Gaming!" because it sounds like shit when you have to say it. I don't know how they are trying to brand it, but I can't imagine this is going to end well, no matter how good the service might be.

    Open Source community has been grappling with this issue forever (GIMP, Libre Office, etc) but it still amazes me to see well-funded companies making these mistakes.

    1. Re:Bad name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't imagine anyone going "Dude, you have to check out xxyomgsexygamergirl's latest video on Youtube Gaming!" because it sounds like shit when you have to say it.

      I can't imagine anyone saying that, because they're just going to say "Dude, you have to check out xxyomgsexygamergirl's latest video!"

    2. Re:Bad name by HairyNevus · · Score: 1

      "Dude, you have to check out xxyomgsexygamergirl's latest video on Youtube Gaming!"

      Link? ;-)

      --
      You were critically hit for no damage. The bruise will look nice, and maybe the scars will make good party talk.
  11. I pray for civilization... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Millions of people watching other people play Minecraft. May God have mercy on us.

    1. Re:I pray for civilization... by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      Millions of people watching other people play Minecraft. May God have mercy on us.

      Or even Hearthstone, or Dota2 (thousands on a single channel!), or old Sega games?? They pack them in over on Twitch.....

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
  12. Will probably fail by g7891107 · · Score: 1

    Some people will probably use it, but it'll be hard to convince people to move away from Twitch, not because it is any better, but because Google isn't really offering any compelling reason to move.

    It's like they assume that just because they are Google, people will immediately jump ship. And we all know how well that worked with Google plus...

    1. Re:Will probably fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think Google engineers ever assume "we're Google". I was watching The International 2015 (DotA 2), and I have to say I loved the YouTube stream way more than the Twitch stream. The YT stream had 60fps 1080p with no Flash, which Twitch couldn't do.

    2. Re:Will probably fail by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Some people will probably use it, but it'll be hard to convince people to move away from Twitch, not because it is any better, but because Google isn't really offering any compelling reason to move.

      It's like they assume that just because they are Google, people will immediately jump ship. And we all know how well that worked with Google plus...

      Well, I can see two places where Google can fix things.

      First is ads - twitch is freaking annoying to watch for me - 30 seconds of content, followed by 30 seconds of ads I don't care about (I got tired of the 100th beer ad I saw the past 100 times). All the time you wonder what you're missing in those 30 seconds.

      Since Google is the king of ads, if they can solve that problem by mixing the ad with stream or a side-by-side view, that's way more acceptable than simply blocking out the content for the ad. Or do the popup ad thing like on YouTube.

      The other thing is better streaming technology - Flash is so dated, and the latency can be terrible. I was watching a livestream because we were playing a game together that required sharing the screen - it was easily a good 30-45 seconds delayed.

    3. Re:Will probably fail by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      Not quite sure which stream you were watching on Twitch however:
      * when ads run (apart from the initial page/stream load) is under control of the streamer, and any decent streamer will only run ads during appropriate breaks (some don't run any at all).
      * Pay the very low cost for Turbo and never see an ad but have the streamer get the money as if you did and there is no interruption to what you are watching.
      * If you are being cheap and don't want to pay then adblock works and streams don't interrupt.

      There is an issue where a poor internet connection on your side will cause your stream to reload and sometimes re-show the initial load ad but that's down to your connection and you were probably already buffering so much the stream was unwatchable anyway...

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    4. Re:Will probably fail by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      And forgot to say... Twitch is already moving to html 5...

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
  13. Chat blows ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The chat is a disaster, though.

    Vinny from Vinesauce (NSFW) experimented with a stream one time, and it was awful.
    The chat was filled with (even more!) spam than his normally spam-filled guff Twitch stream chats are.
    And given his Twitch streams are basically unreadable since a message can go off-screen in about 1.2 seconds on average, that says a lot.

    All of these services REALLY need to update chat systems.
    They get spammed with so much trash posts, poll answers and nonsense.

    One thing they desperately need is a message-concatenation feature. Combining multiple messages in to one.
    This works well when you get multiple people that all say something similar all at the same time. ("lol", "holy shit", emoticon spam, whatever)
    You could combine these and show the number of people that sent this message. If there is a delay of X seconds, stop counting it towards the concat-message.
    Another branch from that, you could allow in-chat polls. Loads of streams tend to ask chat questions with multiple answers. Simply have a tab with a poll in it. It would keep chats from being spammed so much with Yes, No and everything else.
    Equally another great thing, instead of slow-mode, minimum message length mode. Prevent anyone from sending a message below, say, 5 words minimum default, then you could increase it like you can with slow-mode.
    This would prevent a TON of spammy messages and lazily-typed replies. People that spam stupid crap will be timed-out easier, or banned if repeated offences.
    Both of these would improve Twitch and Youtube Gaming chats SO MUCH it pains me to know they haven't already been implemented.

    1. Re:Chat blows ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that's bad you should see niconico wwwwwwwwwwwwww

    2. Re:Chat blows ass by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they will incorporate third party apps like Moobot and Nightbot that helps with the chat issues? If they don't, then folks will quickly tire of the experience.

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
  14. How long will you keep repeating the same line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How long are you going to repeat that same line even after Google has publicly said they've stopped integrating G+ and are actually going in the reverse direction? So "we" know it's not coming, and you should let the people paying you to repeat this line know as well.

  15. Only relevant to 12 year olds and manchildren by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i.e. "and nothing of value was lost".

    When society collapses, look back at things like this for the reason.

    1. Re: Only relevant to 12 year olds and manchildren by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ooooooh, look at the big man, building his most perfect strawman to delineate what entertainment is societally acceptable.

      Now I have seen the light! Time to go binge-watch some random shitty sitcom on Netflix!

    2. Re:Only relevant to 12 year olds and manchildren by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 0

      Who cares what you think, AC?

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
  16. XB1 and PS4 Integration? by mythosaz · · Score: 2

    Until there's an app on both of these platforms, this is going to be an also-ran.

    1. Re:XB1 and PS4 Integration? by flink · · Score: 1

      Until there's an app on both of these platforms, this is going to be an also-ran.

      I'm sure console integration is something they thought about. But in any case to me it feels like most of the big streaming games are either eSports-type multi-player titles (MOBAs, Starcraft, CS:GO) or indie PC let's plays. If you look on twitch, there are plenty of console games in the top 25, but not many console exclusives. I think the PC streaming market alone is big enough to sustain a competing PC-only service at least until Google can work out a deal with the console makers.

      I think the bigger obstacle right now is that the site isn't even loading for me right now: it just sits at a black screen forever. I guess even Google's servers aren't immune to launch hiccups.

    2. Re:XB1 and PS4 Integration? by Badooleoo · · Score: 1

      YouTube is just about everywhere even on the Nintendo Wii U and 3DS.

      If they don't get YouTube Gaming everywhere separately I’m sure they will just work it into their current apps.

    3. Re:XB1 and PS4 Integration? by DeKO · · Score: 2

      Funny you mention the Wii U and 3DS apps. They are just wrapped, unoptimized webkit wrappers. Their webkit versions is old, which is good for the homebrew community; but bad for people that want to use it, since it's so slow and unresponsive.

      You can ask any big Twitch partner about Youtube; the ones that bother to comment about it all agree:Ttwitch takes care of their partners better than Youtube. They only upload some content to Youtube because the Twitch VODs don't show up on the Google searches as high.

      In the end, everyone else did too little, too late. Twitch got the momentum, and the competitors can barely match the small list of features Twitch already has (such as chat moderation, IRC front-end, a balanced way to send money to content producers that doesn't alienate the viewers, etc).

    4. Re:XB1 and PS4 Integration? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Until there's an app on both of these platforms, this is going to be an also-ran.

      The PS4's next firmware release (which is in beta right now) will have Youtube Streaming support

      http://www.vg247.com/2015/08/1...

  17. EVE Online Live Show? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you tell a live show of EVE from a static image?

  18. what about in game music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what about in game music? the game makers may not have streaming rights to that or it may be up to streamer to get there own rights.

    some arcades and bars have issues with music rights and games that have music in them. Cases that have been on this site in the past.

    1. Re:what about in game music? by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      I forgot to disable the in-game radio for GTA V for livestream footage I posted to YouTube and was Content ID'd almost instantly, so whatever money I might have made (had I enabled monetization) is going to UMG now

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
  19. I Will Use This Over Twitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twitch has turned into a SJW worthless censored pile or garbage, with paid emotes and other nonsense. YouTube can even let you get away with nudity yet Twitch won't let you do Adult Only Violence games? Hope their service dies, honestly. Also YT has HTML5 already so...

    1. Re:I Will Use This Over Twitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is an SJW and why do i only ever see it on slashdot?

    2. Re:I Will Use This Over Twitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is an SJW and why do i only ever see it on slashdot?

      Sexy Jedi Wookey

      They're something of a niche interest.

    3. Re:I Will Use This Over Twitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're being serious, SJW means Social Justice Warrior, aka any extreme retarded liberal who wants the world to become like 1984 due to their censoring of "offensive words".

  20. esports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the espanish version of sports

  21. This is not even news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The copyright ID system is in full effect in REAL TIME on the YouTube Gaming platform, this makes it pointless from the get-go. Playing GTA5? Have fun getting your account dinged because the radio, full of licensed garbage, is playing. Anything by Nintendo? Flagged and muted, because Nintendo is anti-gamer. The list goes on and on. Nobody of any value, note, or worth will be using "YouTube Gaming."

  22. The new porn. by xenotransplant · · Score: 1

    Watching other people do it has always been popular, I just never thought that applied to banal and mundane activities. What's next, live streams of the commute to the office?

    1. Re:The new porn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I claim STEP 3!!!

    2. Re:The new porn. by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Watching other people do it has always been popular, I just never thought that applied to banal and mundane activities. What's next, live streams of the commute to the office?

      I've always thought spectator sports is like porn. Guys watching other guys do physical exercise, all excited and sweating, while they could be doing it themselves, but for some reason they don't.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  23. Boring. by xenotransplant · · Score: 1

    I don't get it.

    1. Re:Boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get all these comments about not getting it or that it is boring.

      People compare it to watching sports on TV, but it is more broad than that. People watch all types of skilled activities for entertainment, not just sports.

      Why do people like to watch a juggler or acrobat for instance? It is in appreciation of their mastery. People can more appreciate this mastery in areas that they have some knowledge or experience in. Maybe you don't and it is boring for you to watch as a result, but can you not see why others might be interested?

  24. "Eve Online Live show" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *AHEM* I'm pretty sure you meant to say the 13th annual alliance tournament, thank you very much: http://community.eveonline.com/community/alliance-tournament/

  25. YT Gaming in HTML5 by PPNSteve · · Score: 1

    Just what I've always wanted.. forced 360p LQ video of my fav gaming content makers. GREAT!
    Also, if they are only allowing high subscribed channels in to this then its not cool or useful and seems motr like another way to monetize other's content.

    --
    PPN
  26. Non-compete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every twitch streamer with a sub button has signed a non-compete. They can't stream elsewhere.

    Unless you are a new streamer youtube gaming isn't a threat at all to twitch.

    1. Re:Non-compete by DeKO · · Score: 1

      They can't stream simultaneously elsewhere. A number of twitch partners would switch to hitbox on the bad twitch days (e.g. CosmoWright).

  27. So far not good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So far not good.

    There is no Android app for Australia with the error on the google play page "This item cannot be installed in your devices country".

    Going to https://gaming.youtube.com/ in Pale Moon starts to load the page then instantly goes to a friendly 404 error page at https://gaming.youtube.com/error

    So I tried on a chrome based browser which did load but like all other google pages now there's all these icons that don't say what they do so I start clicking around and then menus overlay all over the place. It doesn't seem organised.

    It was also causing the browser to randomly freeze up maxing the CPU for around 10 to 20 secconds like it was back in the days of a non hyper threaded pentiums.

    I really hope it is improved as it seems like a great idea, why the hell did it take them this long to do this anyway!?

  28. Pretty lacking compared to Twitch by Dopefish_1 · · Score: 1

    I watch a lot of spedrunners and the occasional eSports event on twitch/hitbox. I watched a friend try out youtube's streaming today, because he was excited about it. It seemed competent but not really a serious threat to twitch, at least for now.

    First, the pros:

    - They appear to offer lower quality re-encodes to all streams, whereas Twitch only provides them for partners and streams with a lot of viewers (because re-encodes cost them CPU). This is a nice perk for people who would like to stream at a high resolution/bitrate, but still allow users with bad internet / mobile users to watch them.
    - Support for higher bitrates (above 3500kbps)
    - Youtube has built-in "DVR" functionality, where you can pause and rewind the video at any time during a stream, and then catch back up to "live" when you choose. This is actually a very cool feature that is not offered by Twitch, Hitbox, etc.

    And now, the cons:
    - The interface is bare bones. There's no way to pop out the stream video or the chat. The streamer "profile" page is AWFUL. There's no indicator on the main youtube site that someone you're following is currently livestreaming--you have to go specifically to the gaming subdomain and then pop out the right-side panel.
    - The chat interface doesn't support commands or even emotes (/me). It has no timestamps. It has no user list to see who is watching (no way to know if the person you're chatting with has suddenly left)

    It remains to be seen whether ContentID (or similar) will become a serious problem with youtube's streaming service. It also remains to be seen if they'll follow in twitch's footsteps and implement those silly graphical chat emotes--they're a big part of the twitch culture, and are obviously rather popular, though I for one would be glad to see them go.

    --

    #include <sig.h>
    1. Re:Pretty lacking compared to Twitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ContentID has already caused problems.

  29. A bit google+/facebooky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems a bit a bit google+/facebooky to me.

  30. Damn that UI by Skylinux · · Score: 1

    Looks like the people responsible for the new google maps UI also made this turd.
    Twitch isn't pretty but at least navigating the site makes some sense.
    YouTube Gaming on the other hand is cancer for the eyes. Fucking tablet UIs

    --
    Everyone who buys Wild Hunt will receive 16 specially prepared DLCs absolutely for free, regardless of platform.
  31. N not the only publisher requiring stream royalty by tepples · · Score: 1

    Thats "one" persons opinion

    Everything is one person's opinion until it's tested in a court of law. The article I linked states that such a case has been decided for board games, but not for video games.

    Look, the only company that really doesn't care for streaming is Nintendo, goes to show just how stuck in the past they are.

    From the article I linked: "Capcom can make you get a license for the 'public performance' of the game. In fact, that is exactly what Capcom does with for-profit tournaments" with games in the Street Fighter series. Blizzard likewise has tried to use copyright to give one Korean TV network exclusive rights to StarCraft II . Sega at one time did a massive takedown of its Shining RPG series on YouTube.

    Streaming is built right in to the PS4 and Xbox One.

    From the manual: "For some games, there might be scenes in which video cannot be recorded. The maximum 15 minutes of gameplay that are saved as a video clip do not include scenes in which video cannot be recorded. An icon is displayed in the upper left corner of the screen at the start and end of these scenes." This Ars Technica article agrees. Is a licensee allowed to designate the entire game as such a scene? Apparently so, according to this Polygon article and this reddit post.

  32. Re:N not the only publisher requiring stream royal by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    This Ars Technica article agrees. Is a licensee allowed to designate the entire game as such a scene? Apparently so, according to this Polygon article and this reddit post.

    They "can" but don't, not for Twitch type streaming. The CoD and Minecraft examples you give are for "Share Play" which is different from Twitch/Ustream/Youtube streaming, or "game DVR". Share play lets some one over the internet, log into a "local" mulitplayer game, where they don't even have to own the game.