Slashdot Mirror
Analysis Reveals Almost No Real Women On Ashley Madison
gurps_npc writes: Ashley Madison claimed to have about 31 million men and 5.5 million woman enrolled. Those odds are not good for the men, 6:1. But unfortunately, most of those 'women' were fake. This researcher analyzed the data and found only 12,000 actual, real women using Ashley Madison. That means for every 7750 men, there were 3 women. There are reports that Ashley Madison paid people to create fake female profiles. Their website admits that 'some of the users may be there for "entertainment purposes."' The article itself is well written, including a description of the analysis. A charitable person would say that Ashley Madison was selling a fantasy, not reality. But a realist would say Ashley Madison is just a thief stealing money from lonely, unhappy men.
' Their website admits that 'some of the users may be there for "entertainment purposes."'
Not to confuse those with the 'professional' cheaters.
" That means for every 7750 men, there were 3 women"
So does that mean there were 2583 men for every woman?
Can someone put this into football fields for me?
Was Ashley Madison first and foremost a gay hookup site for married men? Or were vanishingly few guys every getting laid through the site? Or were those few women (literally) staggeringly busy?
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Only transgenders with SJW propaganda
Seems like most dating/casual sex sites I've been on
I've been wondering for a long time now about this Ashley Madison issue. After the hacking has gone down does any one really still give a shit about this story?
Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification
...something along the lines of "Welcome to the Internet, where the men are men, the women are men, and the children are FBI agents" ?
What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
7750 men for every 3 women. To anyone surprised by this, let me be the first to say--welcome to the Internet.
Go watch "Love Me" (available on Netflix) about Ukrainian "mail order" brides. Those guys are charging ten bucks per message from the guy to the woman. Ostensibly because of the translation services they off. One of the dudes on there was out $10k on messages to one woman alone.
soylentnews.org
But a realist would say Ashley Madison is just a thief stealing money from lonely, unhappy men.
But a realist would say Ashley Madison is just cheating men cheating on their wives.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
and how many of those female profiles were just astroturf Ashley Madison profiles put there to entice men into joining?
The whole thing is just a sad commentary on the current state of affairs (no pun intended) of the world we live in. Who are the real villains here? The cheating husbands or the people at AM that set up this apparently honey pot of a web site to lure men in and then charge them to delete their profiles after the fact? A curse on all their houses I say.
I figured a site like that would be a sausage fest, women don't seem to have as much trouble getting laid as most men do.
"If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
Likewise, Axe is a thief for selling boys on the idea that spraying themselves will make babes throw themselves at said stinky young men, and Pantene is a thief for selling women on the idea that using their brand of shampoo will make them supermodels.
Or... gurps_npc is a socialist idiot who doesn't know how humans are actually motivated.
"I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
You'd have a better chance of hooking up on Gilligan's Island.
Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
Sounds like the ratio of men to women in STEM major colleges...
An article I saw said what wasn't released was mostly a database of pictures and messages exchanged through the site. It said there were two problems with releasing the pictures, the database is very large (compared to the text files that compress fairly well), and 40% of the pictures were dick shots and they didn't want to release those. They could still release the database of messages though. I think they are doing the same things as the Snowden leaks, release parts at a time to keep the interest alive, and slowly drive the spike through AM's heart.
Ashley prefers to be called "Bruce" now.
That doesn't sound right. I expect that the men completely outnumber the women, and that the 'women' are largely fake, but only 12,000?
With all the advertising that AM has done, and with the huge number of women online (consider pinterest for heavens sake), and the huge number of women that have affairs, it seems unlikely to me that only 12,000 actual women signed up.
The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
I find this whole Ashley Madison issue supports my belief that anybody who would cheat on their spouse / partner or whatever is a looser from the get go. Just goes to show there is a looser born every minute.
I think it was an extortion honeypot, TBH. It's possible that the CEO has criminal connections, or ties to a government intelligence operation. Think about the leverage that could be applied to government officials, politicians, corporate managers, etc. with this information. For example, it's exactly the kind of info the CIA uses against foreign government officials in order to turn them into intelligence assets. And there's already reports of outed AM account holders being extorted to pay up to get their information removed or the blackmailers will forward the info directly to spouses, friends, family, and co-workers. The timing of the release kind of suspect as well. In addition, another site (Rentboy.com, I think) that potentially has damaging info on its account holders was recently raided by the FBI. What if that was a pre-emptive raid in order to keep its database from falling into the hands of hackers and released to the internet? This is Alex Jones territory, I know, but the stated reasons by the Impact Team for releasing the data just doesn't hold water for me.
... were seeing if they could search for someone specific to catch someone.
I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
I'm sorry, but should we think these stats have changed from ye days or yore in chatrooms?
The sweaty fat guy pretending to be a female?
I'm sure if you had honest reporting, there's be a bunch of creepy stats ... how many people got rolled in a hotel room thinking they were gonna get some, how many people have had extortion attempts, how many people have fapped to dirty chats which was really a guy on the other end.
It's the freakin' internet, isn't the fact that a good portion of the women, especially the ones looking for sex, are actually bored guys?
I'm sure people actually were getting laid, and a woman looking for a man is probably going to succeed. But I bet a lot of guys didn't do anything but chat with other guys without realizing it.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
... did not have any real change of getting anything out of it? That is tragic, and makes the actions of those that have hacked the site and then published the data even more evil.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
Indianapolis Nascar staduim 250,000 people.
Indianapolis Nascar staduim 250,000 people.
"Let's do it in the road", with apologies to the Beatles.
The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
So your saying men are sluts?
Sexist!
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
I have to disagree with the numbers.
Unlike others, I insulated myself well, using prepaid Amex registered to a bogus name and address.
As for the reasons, well there are a number, primarily the person I married is no longer the person I married. That aside, call me a coward if you want, but it is what it is.
Now I did joy spend much, about $200. That equates to 400 credits, at 5 credits for initial contact (after which further communications are free). I never used the overpriced gifts and chat functions.
That amounts to about 80 contact attempts. Response rate was about 15 actual females. That's not to say I jumped into bed with all of them, there does need to be a connection, so it's not always about just fucking. I was also very acutely aware of the fakes, one time curiousity profiles, and such. There are patterns you can see, and you avoid contacting new profiles for a while till you see them around a few times. I'm guessing the area you're in makes a difference too, major metro areas have the most fakes. Also way too many woman looking for a free ride, so basically prostitution.
So yes, it is possible to connect with an actual female. If I had to guess, poor coding resulted in the fields the researcher used to generate the stats, where not actually being used reliably.
On a site like that - the only real women would be women that are either desperate or looking for other women.
I had heard that most the women on AM were call girls. Now I doubt that, as I'd think there'd have been a lot more, but still, there's a third category for your list.
They're women who know they're facilitating cheating and quite possibly destroying families - ever seen what divorce does to kids? Even the amicable divorces do a lot of damage, and divorces due to infidelity tend not to be amicable. A woman who understands she's doing that and is okay with that can't be trusted. These are the kinds of women who poke holes in condoms to get that child support money. If the cheating guy has any sort of standing in the community, like holding some sort of local office or operating any significant business, he can now be blackmailed - and that was before the data was breached. There's already been some suicides over this, in fact.
A call girl would be an improvement.
I'm no prude. I'm all for consenting adult people screwing around if that's what they want to do. When I was younger, I did my own share of that. But I didn't have to lie and cheat to do it, and neither do they. I was not married and I openly told the women I was seeing, up front, "hey I'm not looking for a commitment at this time, in fact I am going to see other people, if you want to do the same, be my guest". It was never an issue and they appreciated the honesty. But to marry someone and claim to make an exclusive commitment, and then abuse their trust like that, it's just plain fucked up. No "puritannical morality" is necessary to see how fucked up that really is. Ask anyone who's ever had it done to them.
Sure they do. It's called facebook. More women use facebook than anything else. You're more likely to find a cheating partner on facebook than anywhere else without having to pay anything. And facebook would protect your damn privacy from your spouse more so than Ashley Madison ever would. So what's the point of Ashley Madison?
Or... gurps_npc is a socialist idiot who doesn't know how humans are actually motivated.
Well, what do you expect from a Non-Player Character in the General Universal Role Playing System? Sounds like little more than a personality-less stat-sheet to me.
Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
Kind like those "women" on AM?
"I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
Their tagline should have been: "Life's short, have a gay affair."
If you are a woman, you just go to any dive bar where you are unlikely to see anybody you know, maybe a town over to meet somebody, or do so discretely in other ways. Given that most women have an endless stream of men drooling after them, it is trivial for them to cheat, whereas for men it is very difficult and takes a lot of effort to find somebody. This is the expected results.
ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
It's an "arrangement", these woman are not lonely housewives. The few they got signed up are pros.
SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT
The Ashley Madison scam is not really that different from selling bogus cures to baldness, snoring, erectile disfunction, or cancer, or promising Russian brides, or bogus kickstarter projects (you can usually sport these, but someone must think they are worth doing). The internet can reach people in such numbers that it is even worth posting 'you won't believe..' set of pictures (usually photoshopped) for the tiny advertising rewards. We can either say that this is natural way of things: that the cunning should rip off the dumb, or we can do something about it.
In this particular case, Ashley Madison claimed to have a sex ratio of about 1:6, which might make it compatible with reputable dating agencies. However, it is not likely that there are millions of Smoking Hot Babes Just Waiting For You out there. If Ashley Madison once had one good-looking lady on the books, the AM sysadmin would have got her first. It is not only likely that the Ashley Madison scheme is just as reported, it is almost impossible that it could have been anything else. There might be a real site somewhere, but it is so much more efficient to be a scam.
Ashley Madison is perhaps not a proper subject for schools. However, schools do try to encourage smaller children to be nice to each other, and cautious of strangers. It might be sensible to introduce them to the net alongside instructive examples of pictures that aren't real (Snopes tear-down of the sharks in the flooded mall picture), offers that are too good to be true (pyramid schemes), how to know the person you e-mail is a real person (meet Eliza), and so on. I think this would make most children more aware of what might be happening on the other side of the screen; and it might even discourage the few who might be tempted to run scams when they see how little the returns must be.
https://youtu.be/yrHEu-c2UFg?t=285
The bizarre thing is that recent sociological research shows that in fact there are many more college educated women than men, in some places (like NYC) it's up to 3:1 F:M.
However, maybe the myth that they "want to cheat" might be what's at odds.
I'll just be over here on Tinder where the real ratio matches the sociological research.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
Likewise, Axe is a thief for selling boys on the idea that spraying themselves will make babes throw themselves at said stinky young men
I assume the purpose is that Axe will dissolve the nose lining of any of its victims thereby rendering them unable to smell the remaining BO.
Pantene is a thief for selling women on the idea that using their brand of shampoo will make them supermodels.
I assume from this that you've never grown your hair long. Trust me, if you have long hair, and especially if it's not just dead straight, you need proper haircare products to keep sane. I thought I could wing it with cheap stuff, but that didn't work.
SJW n. One who posts facts.
If you have to cheat on your partner and risk bringing some STD back home then perhaps divorce is in order or maybe time spent with someone in the mental health industry. Have a Great Day sir.
Don't assume.
Anyway, cut your hair, and no more need for "proper hair care products to keep sane".
"I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
Not just for horses, Wilburrrrr
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Posting anonymously for obvious reasons...
In the city I live in (one of the top 10 for population in the US), there were real women on AM who would respond and meet in person. I met two of them for drinks. Of course, the reality of AM is that for me and the women I met it was just a form of marriage counseling where we needed someone to talk through some issues with. In both cases we talked openly about the challenges that arise at different points in marriages and how sex can suffer. We never talked fantasies and, despite obvious chemistry in one of the meetings, never thought of going further than casual conversation. Finding someone to talk to seemed to be what we were after.
Of course, they may have gone on to do more with other men. But, the only reason they said they responded was because mine one of the only non-creepy messages they received. Apparently even married guys think dick pics and very forward sexual comments are the best way to get a woman's attention (tip: no).
"Why don't we do it in the road". If you're going to quote the Beatles, get it right!
Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
So most of these guys whose lives are now ruined never even got any out of it in the first place? Or was that a very busy few women? Oh, man, and I already thought it was a stupid thing to sign up for!
There are some REAL sluts out there. 3 women to 7000+ men? WOOF.
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
. . . old! . . . (bah-doom boom!)
If you shake someone's hand and risk bringing some respiratory disease back home then perhaps divorce is in order or maybe time spent with someone in the mental health industry. Have a Great Day ma'am.
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
That the ration was 2500 to one. Many people are saying to the BBC and others that they had little trouble meeting on the site.
There probably was a big disparity for all the reasons stated, but I'd be surprised if the end result was greater than about 50:1
Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
Karma: Chameleon
I have a question for the guys out there who do this:
When has this ever worked?
How many guys have actually gotten dates as a direct result of posting explicit photos to their dating profile?
Editor, A1-AAA AmeriCaptions
Since we are two orders of magnitude away from the goal, +50% really doesn't matter.
Also, I agree with WP to not consider race tracks as "stadiums". And I rarely agree with WP.
Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
it's just reality that it's easier for women to get men than it is for men to get women.
Its also a LOT easier for a gay man to get sex than a straight man.
Thats why so many sex-addicted men become gay.
In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
I'm deleting all 6 of my accounts. I simply cant abide dishonesty.
The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
slowly drive the spike through AM's heart.
Are you kidding? There are 1 girl for every 2200 guys or so, between that factoid and the media interest in this, I'd be a months pay they've gotten more subscribers in the last month than in the last year.
This is doing nothing but good for them, all they need to do is put up a reminder about pre-paid CCs when signing up.
2200:1 ratio is better than 0:1 ratio that most of these people actually have of meeting a girl that's willing to sleep with a married man.
If they had a greater than 0 chance without Ashley Madison, they'd never have used AM in the first place.
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
I hope the people who created/run that site a prosecuted for fraud. And all of the others, like PlentyOfFish.
Clearly, that's how the researcher likes his sex. Personally, even when I was younger I don't think I could have managed more than a threesome.
"When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
Theory: Ashley Madison (Avid Life) "hacked" i.e. leaked, their own data as a publicity stunt (since their site was pathetic). Occam's Razor - it explains a few things quite simply. It explains how they managed to hack in. (No hacking involved.) It explains why they're so confident as to offer a huge bounty for the hackers when it seems clear they're about to go broke. (No hackers will be found.) It explains their strange silence to their customers. (You know like the guy who kills his wife, but claims she's missing, but then the cops get phone records and find out he's the ONLY one amongst all her friends & relatives, who ISN'T blowing up her phone with "Where are you?" messages.)
You only have to look at the affiliate marketing commission being offered by these casual dating sites to see it's "men only"
I had a look at this a few years ago but, as my website is 95% female audience, it made no sense to try it.
So if they have no interest in paying for referrals of women where do the women come from?
Digging deeper you'll find that most of the affiliate partners are the porn websites.
The conclusion I came to was that the entire "casual dating" industry was just the monetisation of the online porn industry.
The BBC did an expose on it a few years back.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1TNwC4ctNE
I've wondered how long it'll be before this gets political and regulated.
Before the internet we had to take Polaroids of our junk and leave them under cute girls windshield wipers.
I didn't actually do this. But it happened.
I will never understand why the girls didn't swap them like baseball cards.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
Your saying that there are men that love pussy so much, they change over? Seems unlikely.
More likely gay men are just as slutty as straight men. If it wasn't for women keeping us down, we'd all be getting pussy at a local park.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
Your saying that there are men that love pussy so much, they change over? Seems unlikely.
More likely gay men are just as slutty as straight men. If it wasn't for women keeping us down, we'd all be getting pussy at a local park.
Its not that they love pussy, they love getting off. So they change over. Seems likely to me.
In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
Maybe..... Maybe Not................