Slashdot Mirror


Boeing Demonstrates Drone-Killing Laser

An anonymous reader writes: Boeing has successfully tested a new weapon system that tracks unmanned aircraft and shoots them down with a laser. The system is surprisingly small — it can be transported in a few medium-sized boxes, and two techs can set it up in minutes. The laser needs just a few seconds of continuous [contact] to set a drone aflame, and the tracking gimbal is precise enough to target specific parts of a drone. "Want to zap the tail so it crashes and then you can go retrieve the mostly intact drone and see who is trying to spy on you? Can do. Think it's carrying explosives and you want to completely destroy it? No problem." The laser is controlled with custom targeting software that runs on a laptop, with help from an Xbox 360 controller. Boeing expects the laser system to be ready for sale in the next year or two.

84 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. lasers are for drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You are all Drones. Drones make Rrrrrrrrr. Rrrrrrrrrrrr Drones rrrrrrrrrrr! Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr make the drones. YOU DRONES!!!

    1. Re:lasers are for drones by sycodon · · Score: 1

      OK...now that's funny.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    2. Re:lasers are for drones by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      ...can be transported in a few medium-sized boxes

      Is that a metric or US "medium-sized box"?

      Are we using large or small values of "few" this summer? I can never remember.

      --
      No sig today...
  2. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    can you mount it on a shark?

  3. small? by rossdee · · Score: 1

    it can be transported in a few medium-sized boxes"

    How big is a medium-sized box?

    Rosanna Arquette or John Edwards

    1. Re:small? by skirmish666 · · Score: 2

      The laser needs just a few seconds of continuous to set a drone aflame

      I'd give it a few minutes of continuous just to be safe.

      --
      Sigger than your average
    2. Re:small? by dotancohen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      it can be transported in a few medium-sized boxes"

      How big is a medium-sized box?

      Rosanna Arquette or John Edwards

      This device seems to be an adaptation of the mostly-failed experiments to knock down mortars and grad-style rockets with lasers. Those systems only worked if the projectile was following a previously-known flight path and the laser was set up to protect that specific path, because they couldn't target fast enough. Real-world mortars are less predicable, but drones are slow enough that the targeting seems to work on them.

      It is rather convenient for the researchers that a slower, more media-visible target for their mortar-laser was developed!

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    3. Re:small? by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      About .1 Libraries of Congress.

    4. Re:small? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Which has me wondering just how much unpredictable manoeuvring a small autonomous aircraft would have to do to defeat it.

      What color is it? What about highly reflective surfaces? Many cheap products have "chromed plastic" surfaces. How about ablative surfaces? This is only going to work for a while, as it's going to be easy to design around. But at least it might help keep drones from dropping pistols into prison courtyards for a while.

    5. Re:small? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      The optics, software and servos that make up this kind of system are evolving rapidly- I doubt it is really an adaptation of anything

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    6. Re:small? by fey000 · · Score: 1

      it can be transported in a few medium-sized boxes"

      How big is a medium-sized box?

      Rosanna Arquette or John Edwards

      Bigger than a small box but smaller than a large box.

    7. Re:small? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      People keep bringing up "reflective" surfaces into laser weapon discussions. Think more "energy" than "light". Surfaces: aren't as reflective as you think; particularly at the wavelengths used; and the amount of energy being dumped is enough to change the properties of the surface from the state it was a microsecond before.

    8. Re:small? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Which has me wondering just how much unpredictable manoeuvring a small autonomous aircraft would have to do to defeat it.

      The fine article states that the laser must stay on target for 2 seconds. I don't know if this is to target the plastic (melt, warp, or burn) or the metal (penetrate) components. When targeting mortars the system would heat them until the explosive ignited, when targeting rockets they would be heated until the vehicle failed structurally. I find it hard to believe that these differing applications would all need the same 2 second time period, though.

      Notice that the targeted devices in the video seem to have a dangling antenna, it really seems as though that is helping with targeting. Maybe they can't target drones without the antenna!

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    9. Re:small? by timelorde · · Score: 1
    10. Re:small? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      The optics, software and servos that make up this kind of system are evolving rapidly- I doubt it is really an adaptation of anything

      Sure it is, nobody starts a project like this from scratch. I even recognize the body of the device from infrared cameras from over a decade ago, not identical but very similar.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    11. Re:small? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      There are tens of similar projects the mortar experiment was just one of them

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    12. Re:small? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      There's a picture in the article. Looks about the size of a small microwave oven, less than 2 feet long. (Plus the tripod)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    13. Re:small? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The laser needs just a few seconds of continuous to set a drone aflame

      I'd give it a few minutes of continuous just to be safe.

      I'm not sure that's a good idea. We only have a limited amount of continuous. Now we seem to have more intermittent on hand so you could use intermittent for a few minutes

    14. Re:small? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you give it too much continuous you could accidentally the whole thing.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    15. Re:small? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Medium Box dimensions: 18" x 18" x 16" (W x L x H)

    16. Re:small? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      There are tens of similar projects the mortar experiment was just one of them

      That makes a lot of sense. The four basic components (threat identification systems, targeting systems, laser and related gimballing robots, and field power systems) all have many applications in other fields as well.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  4. Re:What a great idea! by Forgefather · · Score: 2

    My guess is that this will be marketed towards governments to protect capital buildings from drone attacks. Just recently in Japan someone managed to fly a drone with radioactive and onto the roof of the parliament building and left it there for a week before anyone found it. There have also been other such incidents involving drones, and the white house, to which the secret service have admitted they have no way to stop. These will be far out of reach of you average Joe.

    --
    "There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics"
  5. Re:What a great idea! by mccalli · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Shooting drones down will not solve the problem."

    Shooting drones down will solve the problem of having drones in the air. That's the problem this device is designed to solve. None of the other things you mention come under the remit of this device, and the device was not intended to address or solve them. This is just the latest in anti-aircraft evolution.

  6. Lasers and aircraft... by rs1n · · Score: 1

    While this sounds like a great way to take down those pesky drones that interfere with firefighting, planes landing and taking off, etc. what sort of safeguard does this thing have against something that suddenly occludes its view? Drones can fly up to several hundred, even a thousand feet. Even though it can be controlled via a laptop, reaction time as well as latency in communications would mean anything that happens to get in between the laser and the drone could get severely hurt or damaged. Don't we have enough problems as is with just "common" lasers being pointed at aircraft?

    1. Re:Lasers and aircraft... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      I don't want to shoot down the drone. I want to shoot the person piloting the drone. Triangulate the signal controlling the drone to locate the pilot, and then shine your own laser at the pilot.

      Wow! We don't have a nuclear arms escalation race anymore. But we have a drone arms escalation race. Armaments manufacturers will make a bundle on drone/anti-drone selling weapons.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Lasers and aircraft... by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      4931m, 16,000 feet.

    3. Re:Lasers and aircraft... by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      While this sounds like a great way to take down those pesky drones that interfere with firefighting, planes landing and taking off, etc. what sort of safeguard does this thing have against something that suddenly occludes its view? Drones can fly up to several hundred, even a thousand feet. Even though it can be controlled via a laptop, reaction time as well as latency in communications would mean anything that happens to get in between the laser and the drone could get severely hurt or damaged. Don't we have enough problems as is with just "common" lasers being pointed at aircraft?

      My guess is that this will be mostly used in restricted air spaces like above the white house, above the prisons, and other places like that. It could possibly be used in airports and other restricted areas but it sounds like it's accurate enough so it's not going to mistake a full size aircraft with a small drone and even if it does, it's not going to do real damage to a full size airplane.

    4. Re:Lasers and aircraft... by Wycliffe · · Score: 2

      I don't want to shoot down the drone. I want to shoot the person piloting the drone. Triangulate the signal controlling the drone to locate the pilot, and then shine your own laser at the pilot.

      Wow! We don't have a nuclear arms escalation race anymore. But we have a drone arms escalation race. Armaments manufacturers will make a bundle on drone/anti-drone selling weapons.

      Triangulating is an arms race too. A drone on autopilot doesn't need to be controlled and even if you needed to control it, you could control it with a burner phone so the only thing you would be triangulating on would be the nearest cell tower. There are plenty of other technologies like multiple repeaters, multiple channels, public channels, etc... that could also very easily prevent triangulation.

    5. Re:Lasers and aircraft... by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      it's not going to do real damage to a full size airplane.

      I'm sure that's comforting to the pilots that are blinded right before they crash the plane. Pilots already frequently report encountering laser incidents, on average 10 a night and those incidents aren't using lasers specifically designed to destroy things.

    6. Re:Lasers and aircraft... by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      it's not going to do real damage to a full size airplane.

      I'm sure that's comforting to the pilots that are blinded right before they crash the plane. Pilots already frequently report encountering laser incidents, on average 10 a night and those incidents aren't using lasers specifically designed to destroy things.

      You're talking about a $10 laser pointer owned by a punk kid versus a multi thousand dollar device and the technical knowledge to modify it to target a full size aircraft instead of a drone. Even if you could buy one the limited number of these sold would make them trivial to track. This is FUD. The odds of someone buying one of these and using it on a commercial aircraft is pretty much nil as there would be a dozen easier ways to harass an aircraft.

    7. Re:Lasers and aircraft... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      The other issue is triangulating kinda relies on either continuous or multiple transmission. It mostly boils down to you observer the transmission form multiple points, and measure the received energy at each. Next you do a bunch of math to figure out where the transmission likely originated from based on the different energy detected at the receiving stations. Doing that with accuracy to handful of meters as would be needed to quickly id a drone operator and respond is kinda hard when

      1) the detection stations are far a part
      2) there are structures or land forms that might absorb EM (you will need more than just the inverse square law)
      3) you don't have a lot of receive station density. (cells can be quite large in rural areas)
      4) you don't know what EM to tune to
      5) dynamic conditions changes in atmosphere etc

      The technology to auto pilot or simply execute on simple instruction is getting smaller lighter and cheaper. Already some consumer drones can proceed to a set GPS coordinates by themselves. If you don't need to be in constant or even frequent contact with the drone but only need to occasionally send a quick "GOTO $lat,$long,$altitude" it might be very hard to track you down.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    8. Re:Lasers and aircraft... by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Already some consumer drones can proceed to a set GPS coordinates by themselves. If you don't need to be in constant or even frequent contact with the drone but only need to occasionally send a quick "GOTO $lat,$long,$altitude" it might be very hard to track you down.

      Exactly. It would probably be easier to jam the GPS signal and/or all radio transmissions but even this isn't foolproof as image recognition is improving as well as multiple ways of counting steps which could easily allow a drone to complete the voyage without GPS or any guidance.

  7. oh the hubris. by nimbius · · Score: 1

    perfect idea, until the drone thats built with reflective, ceramic-composite materials shows up.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:oh the hubris. by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      perfect idea, until the drone thats built with reflective, ceramic-composite materials shows up.

      Then you hire the Kentucky redneck with a shotgun loaded with bird shot.

  8. Counter measures by leathered · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mirrored surfaces on the drone?

    --
    For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    1. Re:Counter measures by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      Laser-killing drone, obviously.

    2. Re:Counter measures by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      Even better: dazzle painting! Add fake tails and wings to your drone and have it recalibrate itself if one of these pieces is blown off. Sort of like a mini version of the a10 Thunderbolt.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    3. Re:Counter measures by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Every time this topic comes up, someone says "teh mirrors".

      And then someone else points out the duration and intensity of these lasers would simply ablate any mirroring before it had a chance to do any good.

      So I'm going to assume this still won't work.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Counter measures by grumbel · · Score: 1

      Can you use a retro reflector to kill the laser before the laser kills the mirror?

    5. Re:Counter measures by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Chrome plating is only about 70% reflective. A bathroom-variety mirror is only about 75% reflective. The remaining 25%-30% of energy from the laser would be absorbed by the drone as heat. Aluminum coatings used on telescope mirrors can get to about 90% reflectivity, about 98% with good coatings. But that's at a specific wavelength (visual spectrum), and they're very delicate (only about 100 nm thick) and degrade as cruft settles on them. That's why electroplated chrome is more popular for decorative reflectivity - it's much more durable. (Silver actually has better reflectivty, but it quickly tarnishes upon contact with the air. Aluminum does too, but the resulting aluminum oxide is transparent in the visible spectrum and forms an airtight barrier protecting the remaining aluminum.)

      So all a mirrored drone would do is increase the amount of time it takes for a laser to shoot it down. If drones did start to go that route, the obvious countermeasure would be to make the laser more powerful. It's a lot easier to make the laser bigger than it is to keep the mirrored surface of a drone pristine.

      Unrelated trivia: The best reflective surface is actually a prism, which relies on a phenomenon called total internal reflection - the same property which makes optical fibers work. Their biggest losses are actually at the air-prism interface where the light enters and exits the prism - typically 99.7%-99.8% transmission. They're highly directional though, so (unless someone can come up with an extremely clever design) wouldn't work omnidirectionally.

  9. Mirrored drones = deadly disco balls? by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

    If it takes this laser 2 seconds to drill through a tough drone body, how long would it take this laser to cause serious injuries to a human being if the drone were protected by mirrors (say mirrors camouflaged by a thin film that the laser can destroy instantly) that reflect the beam downward towards a crowd on the ground?

    1. Re:Mirrored drones = deadly disco balls? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      The mirror coating is barely reflective to a laser, and will burn off just about as quickly as the camouflage coating which you propose. What is needed to have any real effect is an ablative laser coating which continues to be reflective as it is burned away. AFAIK no such material exists as of yet, in spite of being prophesied in roll-playing games (i.e. Battletech.)

      However, yes, there will be some reflections while the target is being cooked, and if it is at low altitudes that could be quite dangerous to any spectators.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Mirrored drones = deadly disco balls? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      What if the target's shell is rapidly spinning?

      Then you play Star Castle.

      How do you propose to get vectored thrust in and out of a disco ball?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Mirrored drones = deadly disco balls? by CmdrTamale · · Score: 1

      Vectored thrust - synchronized pulses?
      Steering might be a more interesting problem.
      --
      Fear the new things! Fear the unknown! The government will protect you!

    4. Re:Mirrored drones = deadly disco balls? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that the nice white thermal dissipating ceramic the space shuttle used during atmospheric re-entry would work great as a defense.

      I don't like to make assumptions, but it does sound like a fairly reasonable one to me. I'd like to see someone test it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Mirrored drones = deadly disco balls? by strikethree · · Score: 1

      The mirror coating is barely reflective to a laser, and will burn off just about as quickly as the camouflage coating which you propose. What is needed to have any real effect is an ablative laser coating which continues to be reflective as it is burned away. AFAIK no such material exists as of yet, in spite of being prophesied in roll-playing games (i.e. Battletech.)

      Hm. It seems to me that the ideal way to handle this is to have the material ablate in such a manner that it leaves a cloud of particles hanging in the air, forcing the laser to burn through the cloud as well.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  10. Where is my mosquito laser? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Interesting

    mozzies are way more annoying than drones

    1. Re:Where is my mosquito laser? by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 2

      Exactly! I've been waiting on that thing for years. They keep talking about ending malaria with it. That's fine. I'll even pay $100 instead of $50 to donate one unit to Africa. Just set the blasted thing up in my backyard.

    2. Re:Where is my mosquito laser? by darkshadow · · Score: 2
      --
      -Darkshadow (There was a thing called Heaven; but all the same they used to drink enormous quantities of alcohol.)
    3. Re:Where is my mosquito laser? by ardave8952 · · Score: 1
  11. Drone-Killing Laser by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Now we need someone to make a Laser-Killing Drone.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:Drone-Killing Laser by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      No need. Just drop some chum in the water - you'll instantly distract the shark in charge of the laser.

  12. Mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cue the knuckleheads with their "just put mirrors on the dronze herp derp!"

    Mirrors aren't 100% efficient reflecting all wavelengths. Mirrors are heavy; a mirror covered drone won't work very well.

    1. Re:Mirrors by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      And it has to be a front surface mirror lest the substrate or any protective coverings or coatings absorb the laser energy and negate the point of having a mirror in the first place... I.E. the most difficult kind of mirror to keep as clean and flawless as it has to be to provide the desired protection.

    2. Re:Mirrors by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      Aluminized mylar has 95% IR reflectivity and 90% visible reflectivity. At .001" thickness I don't think you can call it "heavy". It might not make the drone "laser proof" but it sure can't hurt. Have the drone wobble or spin when it gets lased, and you are going to have a bitch of a time keeping the laser on one spot long enough to burn through.
       
      signed A. Knucklehead

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    3. Re:Mirrors by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      That 0.001" is going to get melted instantly by the percentage that isn't reflected.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    4. Re:Mirrors by hey! · · Score: 2

      I don't think you could make the reflective surface perfect enough to make the drone positively laser-proof, but I think a reflective coating would certainly reduce the laser's effective range. Analogously you can't nuke-proof an aircraft, but in the Cold War they were often painted "anti-flash white" to help them survive a bit closer to a detonation.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  13. Number 4 Birdshot is still more fun! by rjune · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll stand by my previous post that #4 birdshot is still more fun, plus it it mirror resistant.

    1. Re:Number 4 Birdshot is still more fun! by rjune · · Score: 1

      Should read: I'll stand by my previous post that #4 birdshot is still more fun, plus it is mirror resistant.

  14. Re:What a great idea! by Barbecue911 · · Score: 2

    My guess is that this will be marketed towards governments to protect capital buildings from drone attacks. Just recently in Japan someone managed to fly a drone with radioactive and onto the roof of the parliament building and left it there for a week before anyone found it.

    This is a failure of detection not interception. The laser will only work if somebody first spots the drone.

  15. Kentucky suburbanites by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Much more likely to actually be used.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  16. Someone will get rich ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... when they figure out how to make it into a bug zapper.

    1. Re:Someone will get rich ... by cmseagle · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Someone will get rich ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

      Pretty cool, but around here they'd need to target yellow jackets to have a commercial winner.

    3. Re:Someone will get rich ... by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      ... when they figure out how to make it into a bug zapper.

      Easy, just claim the drone has a microphone.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  17. Mirrors anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Lol. I would just put mirrors on my drone and destroy the laser.

    Idiots.

  18. Open source rocks. by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Can't wait until this makes it to the open source community!

  19. Re:"a few seconds of continuous"... what? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1
  20. What kind and size of drone are we talking about? by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    Are we talking about those relatively small drones with multiple propellers that cost $1k or so and fly at a few hundred feet altitude or are we talking about the big ones the CIA and military use in places like Syria and Iraq? The big ones may have GPS guided bombs able to be flown at night or through clouds and fog and can be effective weapons in bad weather. Lasers aren't very useful in bad weather situations because of light scattering. Would this anti-drone device be useful for, maybe, shooting down Amazon packages?

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  21. Just mirror coat the drone by packetspike · · Score: 1

    So this is all they can come up with, just mirror coat the drone and the laser is of no use. We coat glass with compounds that create perfect mirrors, you could do the same with drone covering... My 8m old baby could do better than this.

  22. Re:What a great idea! by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    I do believe some guy in New jersey beat Boeing to this goal by a year, and for hundreds of millions less....

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  23. Re:What a great idea! by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

    I do believe some guy in New jersey beat Boeing to this goal by a year, and for hundreds of millions less.... (resubmitted thanks to /.'s odd URL wiping behavior)

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  24. Re:Mirrors - Won't somebody think of the children? by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 1

    Going to make interesting cases when someone gets blinded or dazzled so that they have an accident by the light reflecting off the drone.

    This will make a lot of lawyers rich deciding whom to sue.

  25. That continuous is bad news! by chuckugly · · Score: 1

    "The laser needs just a few seconds of continuous to set a drone aflame"

    That continuous is bad news! Who knew? I wonder if Amazon sells it?

  26. Re:What a great idea! by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

    My guess is that this will be marketed towards governments to protect capital buildings from drone attacks. Just recently in Japan someone managed to fly a drone with radioactive and onto the roof of the parliament building and left it there for a week before anyone found it. There have also been other such incidents involving drones, and the white house, to which the secret service have admitted they have no way to stop. These will be far out of reach of you average Joe.

    They will be obligatory if you want to have a large wedding reception in Afghanistan.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  27. What about manned aircraft by davidwr · · Score: 1

    When this tech gets simple enough that any suicidal mass-murderer can get ahold of one, no low-flying aircraft will be safe - which means no aircraft taking off or landing in a populated area will be safe.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:What about manned aircraft by davidwr · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more along the lines of a jumbo jet taking taking off or landing from a typical urban airport.

      When easy-to-conceal-until-you-use-them, cheap anti-aircraft weapons that can take down a passenger jet that's less than 10,000 feet in the air hit the black market, you'll start to see suicidal murderers who want their 15-minutes-of-infamy using them on US soil.

      I say "suicidal" because once you fire one of these, you will be found, and once you are caught, you can plan on spending the rest of your life in jail or if you are death-penalty-eligible, getting the state to help you in your suicide wish.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  28. Needs refinement by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    When they get to shark helmet size let me know. I still want my sharks with fricken laser beams.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  29. no RPG or ack-ack guns... by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    This is a ridiculous assertion. Rocket Propelled Grenades are not for sale at gun shows in the US.

    Some civilians do own .50 anti-aircraft guns with significant licensing. Not 'extreme survivalists' so much as military memorabilia collectors.

  30. Drone Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Begun, The Drone War has!

  31. Re:What a great idea! by Forgefather · · Score: 1

    Even if they spot the drone what can they do about it? It's not like they can randomly fire bird shot at it, and they don't have any sort of practical anti air system for such a small flying device. The laser system is meant to fill that gap.

    --
    "There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics"
  32. Oh, rats... by rgbatduke · · Score: 1

    So they finally invented something that would make me seriously consider buying an Xbox. I hope they have it in the stores in time for Christmas. I can think of a dozen great uses for it -- killing flies, drilling holes through would-be burglar's shoes (feet inside), a new way to light the barbecue grill. In fact, who needs the grill? Next summer I can reprogram it to keep the squirrels out of my peaches at the same time it prepares me a tasty laser-grilled peach-fed squirrel for dinner out of the ones that move too slowly! One wonders if it is sensitive enough to keep a yard cleared of mosquitoes (without putting anyone's eyes out, of course, at the yard party).

    rgb

    --
    Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
  33. One corner reflector carrying drone from disaster. by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

    That is all it would take, a team of drones with the first one being a decoy that will damage the laser. Sorry Boeing but there is a smarter way of taking out drones, without projectiles or lasers.