Slashdot Mirror


Unearthed E.T. Atari Game Cartridges Score $108K At Auction

MojoKid writes: Hundreds of Atari 2600 cartridges of E.T. The Extra Terrestrial that were excavated last year from a landfill in Alamogordo, New Mexico collectively raked in nearly $108,000 through eBay auctions. Some $65,000 of that will go to the city of Alamogordo, while the Tularosa Basin Historical Society will receive over $16,000. Over $26,600 went to shipping fees and other expenses. A team of excavators led by operational consultant Joe Lewandowski unearthed the E.T. cartridges in front of a film crew. The high profile (among gaming historians) dig was the basis a documentary called Atari: Game Over, which is available for free through the Microsoft Store.

39 of 62 comments (clear)

  1. At least the historical society is getting a piece by wwphx · · Score: 1

    They're moving in to a new (to them) building and probably could use the funds.

    I'm a local, unfortunately I was out of town when the dig happened, otherwise I would've been there doing some photography and laughing.

    --
    When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  2. available for free through the Microsoft Store. by robi5 · · Score: 1

    How ironic

    1. Re:available for free through the Microsoft Store. by rmdingler · · Score: 2

      How ironic

      Sure, but what people get with this physical game cartridge is a really great story to go with their game.

      Priceless.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:available for free through the Microsoft Store. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just wait until the high profile dig to unearth the millions of buried Windows ME diskettes. It'll be the basis a documentary called "Microsoft: WTF?!?", which will be available for free through the Google Store

  3. ha by nomadic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Funny, people have been talking about excavating those cartridges for at least 15+ years.

  4. Documentary on Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... was the basis a documentary called Atari: Game Over, which is available for free through the Microsoft Store.

    It's also on Netflix, for those that don't know what the Microsoft Store is or even want to know what the Microsoft Store is.

    1. Re:Documentary on Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I realise this is the tried-and-tested /. theme, but who from the '80s onward would you say has the greatest responsibility for enabling serious computing for the masses? List five firms that have made a greater contribution than Microsoft to the specific task of getting a personal computer on every desk.

      Or, to tackle your "shitting all over it", what was available in 1981 that was ruined by Microsoft? What was available in the '90s that was ruined by Microsoft? What was available last decade that was ruined by Microsoft?

    2. Re: Documentary on Netflix by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      (Named)

      Named something that was a copy of something which was already relevant when it was created. If that's the best you can do, you've only proven my point. The very best they can do is imitate, and you're lapping it up. Easy to see why you're too cowardly to log in.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re: Documentary on Netflix by popo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As a former financial analyst I could probably name 100 innovations in Excel alone.

      Don't feed the idiot trolls. Microsoft = Bad is all they know.

      --
      ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    4. Re: Documentary on Netflix by buckfeta2014 · · Score: 1

      AJAX is the devil.

      --
      Buck Feta. You know what to do.
    5. Re: Documentary on Netflix by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      As a former financial analyst I could probably name 100 innovations in Excel alone.

      Then we could see how many of those 100 innovations actually existed in earlier products from competitors, except I'm not going to do that much research. Spreadsheets are not exactly new technology.

      Don't feed the idiot trolls. Microsoft = Bad is all they know.

      I'm running Windows 7 right now. But there's nothing innovative about it. I'm not running it because it was full of fresh ideas. I'm running it because that's where the software I want to run can be successfully executed.

      I'm slowly getting the idea that most of you don't have very broad OS experience, and that's why you're so amazed by Microsoft. I used to think that everyone on Slashdot was smart. That was a long time ago, but I still have this tendency to assume that people here are knowledgeable. Problem is, they aren't, especially the Microsoft-lovers who have absolutely minuscule memories. Microsoft has done far more to harm the industry than to help it, but if you only remember the shiny shiny and the PR and what corporations say about themselves, you might forget that Microsoft was proven in court to have abused its monopoly position and to have engaged in all manner of other anticompetitive activity. They got where they are not through technical competence, but through skullduggery. It would really help if people would avoid forgetting that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re: Documentary on Netflix by houghi · · Score: 2

      As a Fijenoord supporter: I agree!

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    7. Re: Documentary on Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Spreadsheets are not exactly new technology."

      Troll move goalpost. Troll don't want to lose.

    8. Re: Documentary on Netflix by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      +1000

      That was the start of AJAX and sophisticated asynchronous web applications. Without it we'd still be stuck with get and post.

      Actually if you want to speak of what Microsoft has done for the web...

      During the DOJ investigation, it was found out (by subpoenaing internal Microsoft memos) that the whole reason Microsoft created Internet Explorer was because they perceived the web as being a threat to Windows. That is, when they saw the rise of Netscape, they noticed how developers could write web applications and plugins for the browser, which ran on any platform, so developers were now free to target Netscape instead of their cash cow.

      Microsoft was having none of that, so they explicitly designed IE to break the more advanced web standards, as well as introducing activex, so that if IE reached critical mass (say, over 70% of users) then they could render the web to become something that permanently belongs to Windows. After Windows 98 achieved that (by including it built in, which saved download time for dialup users, which were the vast majority at the time) then the world was stuck with IE5 and IE6 for about 7 years, which fully neglected to implement new web standards, and barely even supported HTML4.

      So in other words, Microsoft deliberately held back web development for 7 years.

      Meanwhile, guess what happened when AJAX did finally come around? Microsoft saw their freemail dominance in purchased hotmail fall flat on its face, as gmail's web interface was even faster than the copy of Outlook that most people ran natively on their desktop (the gig of email space was just to get people in, but the webUI was the real innovation there, which unlike hotmail, didn't require a full page reload every time you clicked anything.) Microsoft also saw Google maps completely wipe out their sales of MapPoint and Streets & Trips.

    9. Re:Documentary on Netflix by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Frankly I thought they were making a statement about the game itself by only releasing it on the Microsoft Store.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    10. Re:Documentary on Netflix by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It may be free, but you have to sell your soul to get a Microsoft Account. Or at least get a fake email account.

    11. Re:Documentary on Netflix by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It probably is the best game on the Microsoft Store.

    12. Re: Documentary on Netflix by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, guess what happened when AJAX did finally come around? Microsoft saw their freemail dominance in purchased hotmail fall flat on its face, as gmail's web interface was even faster than the copy of Outlook that most people ran natively on their desktop (the gig of email space was just to get people in, but the webUI was the real innovation there, which unlike hotmail, didn't require a full page reload every time you clicked anything.)

      You mean the AJAX web client that google copied from Microsoft's Exchange Web Client that was released 7 years prior to gmail (1997 vs 2004)?

    13. Re: Documentary on Netflix by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Sorry, Microsoft's Exchange Web Client was in beta in 1995, and released in 1997. Gmail was in beta in 2004, and released in 2009. Pick between them, either a 9 year lead, or 12 year lead. In either case, google had no "innovation" and just copied what Microsoft originally did.

      Other contributions that come to mind are wide spread adoption of TCP Offload, Selective ACK, Window Scaling on the OS side. There are a number of other great improvements that they may not have invented, but brought mainstream... Prioritized I/O being one of the best. As far as research, their advances in speech recognition and machine learning is impressive.

      Filesystems -- FAT32 and NTFS, the later still being very good even today.

  5. One man's trash... by Dareth · · Score: 4, Funny

    One man's trash is another man's treasure. Though if they actually try playing the game they might rebury the whole lot.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:One man's trash... by narcc · · Score: 2

      It's not a bad game at all. With a few tweeks, it's even better.

    2. Re:One man's trash... by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      Actually the Atari 400/800/XL/XE games were MUCH better than the 2600 everyone remembers. The Atari ST games were great as well. The 2600 was a piece of crap.

  6. Re:At least the historical society is getting a pi by MouseR · · Score: 1

    Not much of a piece. City is the winner here.

  7. 1,200 found by Dan+East · · Score: 2

    It looks like they unearthed around 1,200 cartridges. Does that mean there isn't any truth to the legend that hundreds of thousands were buried, or is that all they bothered to locate and excavate? After all, if they dug up 100,000+ cartridges, they would flood their own market and they wouldn't sell for as much on ebay, etc.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:1,200 found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...they would flood their own market and they wouldn't sell for as much on ebay, etc.

      What a hilariously fitting end that would be for one of the games credited with crashing the video game market.

    2. Re:1,200 found by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

      It is a great documentary, and it answers your question.

      --
      Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
    3. Re:1,200 found by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      It looks like they unearthed around 1,200 cartridges. Does that mean there isn't any truth to the legend that hundreds of thousands were buried, or is that all they bothered to locate and excavate? After all, if they dug up 100,000+ cartridges, they would flood their own market and they wouldn't sell for as much on ebay, etc.

      There is truth that maybe 100,000 or so were buried there. They were unsold copies and returns. Alongside that though, they found an equal mix of other games, including pong, space invaders and other popular games. So that part of the truth, that it consisted of all ET cartridges, is false.

      It turns out Atari was having massive overstock of every game, so they sent a lot of it to the dump, but that included many other, more popular games as well.

      As for ET being the downfall, it turned out it sold pretty well - despite it being awful, it sold a lot because well, ET. It just was a bad game (not even the worst). It gets its rap fro several reasons, being one of the last released games that Atari released. Even the programmer was well known for producing hits (including the likes of Yar's Revenge).

      It's just the market got oversaturated with crap that led to the great videogame crash, and ET was among the crap.

      The documentary is actually a pretty good watch, and it helps give credence to part of the myth as well as blowing other parts out of the water.

    4. Re:1,200 found by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

      The documentary tries to show that ET has become known for being a crap game, without many people ever playing it. Many thought the game was too challenging, which does not necessarily equal the game being crap. I have not taken the time to play the game, so I will not call it crap.

      --
      Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
    5. Re:1,200 found by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      Atari also had the 400/800 computers and the 5200 in that timeframe which were much better than the 2600. The Atari 400/800/XL/XE was nearly twice as fast as the C64 with a much larger color palette and better I/O. C64 had better hardware sprites though.

    6. Re:1,200 found by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      It gets its rap fro several reasons, being one of the last released games that Atari released.

      Are you smoking crack? Atari had the 7800 after that, the XE Game System, the Lynx and the Jaguar. Atari also had 2 relatively successful lines of computers as well that sold until the early 90's.

      Atari was bought by Tramiel in '84 and some aspects of quality declined but they were still alive and kickin'.

  8. E.T. phone home, tell them that HE'S RICH BITCH! by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

    Not such a failure NOW, huh, Atari?

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  9. 180k isn't very much for the effort involved. by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

    By the time you include the cost of excavation, the cost of shipping, and all the labor involved from the research, getting permission, filming it, etc... then $108k is peanuts and likely doesn't even cover a fraction of the costs. My guess is that they would be deeply in the red if it wasn't for the film but they have likely made considerably more than the $108k by selling rights to the film.

  10. I wonder how much mine are worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I recently excavated several Atari cartridges from my closet. I think there's 2 or 3 ETs there and up to a dozen Combat. Offering $100 each for them.

  11. $57 for Zaxxon, yikes! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    $108,000 / 900 = $120 per cartridge

    Assuming $40 price in 1982, after inflation, that is $98.92, so an "investor" would profit about $20 per. That doesn't account for shipping, and assuming his mom let him store them in the basement for free next to his bed.

    Of course you could buy them for a dollar a pound soon after release.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  12. I don't care how much they paid for them... by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    I don't care how much they paid for them. The game still sucks!

  13. Microsoft by sjbe · · Score: 2

    List five firms that have made a greater contribution than Microsoft to the specific task of getting a personal computer on every desk.

    I can think of three you could make a solid argument for. IBM, Apple and Intel. Microsoft would certainly fall somewhere in the top 5 though. Exactly where is an exercise for the reader.

    What was available in the '90s that was ruined by Microsoft?

    Web standards and web browsers is probably the best example. Third party OEM operating system installation though restrictive licensing agreements. Security - macro viruses in particular. DRM facilitation.

    What was available last decade that was ruined by Microsoft?

    Nokia comes to mind... The Windows interface also.

  14. Re:Waste of money by moeinvt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "The only sane reason I could see to dig the things up is so that they could be properly recycled..."

    The "sane" reason for digging them up is that they were apparently worth $108,000 at auction. Very sane.

    As far as a sane reason for buying one, I'm at a loss. Nostalgia?

  15. Re:Excel "innovations" by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

    As a power Excel user, you'd be a great person to create/reference an Excel/Google spreadsheet/Libreoffice Calc/others comparison table, grouped and/or sorted by the more useful spreadsheet functions. It would help people discover the more useful functionality and avoid the fluff and distractions added in recent years.

  16. Comparing spreadsheets by sjbe · · Score: 1

    As a power Excel user, you'd be a great person to create/reference an Excel/Google spreadsheet/Libreoffice Calc/others comparison table...

    Such lists can be misleading. For example both LibreOffice and Excel have decent pivot table functionality but there are some quirks to each. Hard to explain the differences briefly in a table. Little things can sometimes make a big difference in which you might choose. For example I used LibreOffice Base to tie into an old database for some spreadsheets at my company. Access couldn't connect for some obscure technical reason.

    Here is the Cliff Notes version:

    Excel is probably the best overall but LibreOffice is good enough for most people unless everyone you work with is using Excel. The extra features and polish in Excel won't matter for 95% of the users out there. If you really use stuff like VBA heavily then it's probably ok to fork over the money for Excel. If you aren't tied to Excel by a userbase or specific feature need then go with LibreOffice. It's pretty easy to migrate to Excel if you have the need down the line in most cases. LibreOffice obviously is the easy choice if you use Linux. My company for example standardized on LibreOffice and it's been fine for our needs. There are other spreadsheets out there but unless one has a very specific feature need it would be hard to justify using them. For example Apple's Numbers spreadsheet is ok but it lacks some features and nobody really uses it so it's only really useful for personal projects.

    The cloud versions (Google, MS, etc) are fine for simple projects and collaborations but if you have hard core number crunching to do or need pretty formatting or need to integrate with other office suite software then you'll usually go with Excel or LibreOffice. I expect the cloud versions will get better in time but they aren't there yet. Excel has better cloud integration than LibreOffice if that matters to you but neither integrates super well with Google's offerings.