Slashdot Mirror


Report: Google Will Return To China

An anonymous reader writes: Google famously withdrew from mainland China in 2010 after fending off a series of cyberattacks from local sources. Now, according to a (paywalled) report from The Information, the company is working on plans to return. "As part of the deal Google is looking to strike, Google would follow the country's laws and block apps that the government objects to, one person told The Information." They're also seeking approval for a Chinese version of Google Play.

82 comments

  1. Folding@Home by sims+2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So I guess we can say google is Folding@Home?

    Seriously though the blockade should stand.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    1. Re:Folding@Home by Tokolosh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is it evil to kowtow to evil?

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    2. Re:Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That google slogan of "dont' be evil" has been nothing but a scam.

    3. Re:Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if there is anything from google that is nsn-xxx-xxxx order it now before it's blocked

    4. Re:Folding@Home by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously though the blockade should stand.

      Leaving China was a mistake. Google's departure accomplished nothing. Google should be in China, to offer people an alternative, even if it is imperfect.

    5. Re:Folding@Home by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Personally I felt they were better off using any one of the many ways to access the uncensored google from china. Which they had to do if they wanted to use google.

      Now they will have the choice between Crippled engine A and Govt run index B.

      They are probably going to use the crippled engine now even if they had a way around before just because its easier.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    6. Re:Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was originally legit before they went public.

    7. Re:Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nah, nah, Google stands by what it says. They just never publicized the full motto:
      "Don't be evil, we're watching you."

    8. Re:Folding@Home by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah I worried about that when it happened.
      I am actually really surprised they still have a search engine.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    9. Re:Folding@Home by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Now they will have the choice between Crippled engine A and Govt run index B.

      They can still access Google outside China by using a VPN. Since porn is censored in China, nearly every post-pubescent male already has access to a working VPN.

    10. Re:Folding@Home by trabby · · Score: 1

      The funny thing about China is although they have workarounds for much of the government censorship is that they don't bother.

      It has to do with internal communication between citizens, they don't go on Facebook not because they can't but because none of their network is there.

      They only work around the censorship when needed for relations with other countries.

      Same goes for using Google services. Google needs a presence there to get some mind share from the populace, even if it is heavily censored.

    11. Re:Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As somebody that used to live in China, not having access to their products was a huge PITA. Google Maps in particular is something for which there really isn't an adequate replacement in China. For locals, it's probably fine, but if you can't read Chinese, the maps were mostly worthless. And Baidu maps wouldn't run at all on my phone as it would crash constantly.

    12. Re:Folding@Home by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Pretty much.

      Seriously, if I wanted to run an authoritarian regime restricting internet content, there are certain things that would be absolutely left unblocked, namely porn and cat memes/videos.

    13. Re:Folding@Home by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      They can still access Google outside China by using a VPN.

      We've got faculty who regularly travel to China - their access to our university VPN service is routinely interfered with.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    14. Re:Folding@Home by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      So I guess we can say google is Folding@Home?

      It didn't get a lot of press, but Google folded to China a couple years ago.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    15. Re:Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was thinking. They're "profit above all else" these days and that's pretty fucking evil.

    16. Re:Folding@Home by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We've got faculty who regularly travel to China - their access to our university VPN service is routinely interfered with.

      They should ask some teenage boys for help. It also makes a huge difference where they are in China. Censorship is very heavy in Beijing, but much lighter in Shanghai and even lighter in smaller cities. It is heavy in Tibet, but much lighter in Xinjiang. That is because Westerners care about the Tibetans because Brad Pitt and Richard Gere made movies about them. But Westerners don't give a crap about the Uighurs.

    17. Re: Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking notes...

      PORN and MEMES...

    18. Re:Folding@Home by fulldecent · · Score: 2

      Yes, China beat the network effect problem by:

          1. Jumping in early
          2. Ruthlessly blocking competition

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    19. Re: Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly pretty common too.

    20. Re:Folding@Home by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 2

      Are you sure? I've been to China multiple times. Some observations:
      - OpenVPN connections are killed at the handshake. Workaround is hide the handshake; there are multiple ways to do this.
      - SSH (allows tunneling) worked fine when I was there this summer. One time, in 2014, it seemed to degrade over time. But this probably was just been my imagination, because of the following:

      CHINA'S INTERNATIONAL PEERING SUCKS ASS. It doesn't matter if you have a T1 at home: international connections are going to be slow as molasses. A lot of people say China "degrades VPNs", but my observation is more that the country just has bad peering to other countries. You can get fast domestic Internet access, but international sites and servers -- the ones that aren't blocked -- are going to be slow and unreliable, because the upstream peering is running at something like 200% capacity, and your packets are going to get frequently dropped.

      Now, an interesting question is whether their international peering sucks on purpose as an extension of their censorship. Maybe, maybe not. Whatever the case, you can get an uncensored proxy out very easily, but expect some slowness and unpleasantness. Not because they're using some super-duper magic proxy-degrading technology, though. That's probably not happening. If they catch you, they'll probably just cut you off, not slow you down. What's probably happening is that China's international peering sucks, and you're running into the congestion.

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    21. Re:Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      porn is censored

      Have you ever actually been on this side of the Great Firewall?
      There are plenty of porn sites that work all the time, some that work sporadically and some that never work.

    22. Re:Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fat, ignorant lao wai. Plenty of porn sites exist in China, such as this. Like weeds, when the government pulls one, another pops up. No need for proxies either, because there are a lot of porn sites that aren't blocked in China. Even The Hun.

    23. Re:Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More bullshit from the laying asshole in Shanghai, which isn't a real surprise considering it's a haven for shady expats. I've been around more than you, longer than you, and haven't found any evidence to support the idea that different cities have different firewall restrictions. Motherfrucker, do you actually know any teenage boys? They're too busy playing DOTA or CS:GO to give a shit about proxy servers. No one gives a shit about Uighurs because they're dirty Muslims. Duh!

    24. Re:Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've lived here non-stop for over 8 years in 3 cities. Proxy servers are regularly interfered with. Though outside connects are somewhat slower, yes, but my connection is fast enough to stream from comedy central, for example, and my torrent download rates easily excede 10 Mbs. Perhaps higher, but that's what I've got them capped at.

    25. Re:Folding@Home by Hasaf · · Score: 1

      As is so often said, one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter. There are few places that phrase is as true as it is in Xinjiang.

    26. Re:Folding@Home by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Kind of important is the headline is misleading and factually incorrect. It states that Google will return to China. If the summary is accurate they are researching returning to China and have not yet concluded that this is their definite course of action. A more accurate headline would be that Google is considering a return to China.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    27. Re:Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NSA now China: bend over and spread 'em
      Google: how wide?

    28. Re:Folding@Home by Baki · · Score: 1

      The problem is that some groups of freedom fighters throw bombs around and don't seem to care for accidental bystanders becoming victim.
      I guess their theology makes everyone 'guilty'.
      It is mostly people of a certain religion displaying this type of behaviour.
      In the eyes of the vast majority, that makes them terrorists, no matter if their goals are justified, their means are not.

    29. Re:Folding@Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we've been told by China that "they" (all Uighurs) are terrorists (I mean, FFS? Can't you tell? They're *MUSLIMS*!!!)

      In truth, I doubt most westerners don't even know what a Uighur is because China isn't eager for journalists to cover them and reporting something like "YouTube star announces baby number 2"*, "Tennis Pro's Speedy Grip Change-Up"*, Steven Tyler Busks in Russia"* or "Queen Elizabeth Attends Highland Games"* is just so much more important

      *all taken from top "news" stories on Yahoo! No really, not "Sports" or "Entertainment", but "News".

      Uighur, please!

  2. Somebody had to sell Hitler the ovens by John+Jorsett · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess it's too much to expect any company, even the "do no evil" one, to stand up for principle when there's so much money at stake.

    1. Re:Somebody had to sell Hitler the ovens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Godwin's law struck pretty fast on this one.

    2. Re:Somebody had to sell Hitler the ovens by swillden · · Score: 1

      I guess it's too much to expect any company, even the "do no evil" one, to stand up for principle when there's so much money at stake.

      Especially when it's doing absolutely no good. It made sense for Google to stand up to China when it appeared that there was a good chance they could win. But China won. The absence of Google's services did not cause the Chinese people to demand it, and the Great Firewall was successful at blocking and degrading Google's services enough that people largely don't bother. VPN services exist, but the Firewall makes them unreliable and short-lived solutions, so the Chinese just don't use Google much. And those who are doing all of the work to get around the Firewall are those who will do that work to get to uncensored search services anyway.

      So, money aside (not that Google is ignoring the money), there's really nothing to be achieved by staying out of China, and at least some possibility of achieving something by being in China.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Somebody had to sell Hitler the ovens by Chris+Graham · · Score: 1

      Yes there is something to be achieved. Clearly sticking to your principles prevents an apathetic drift to amorality, and sets an example for others to measure against. That is very valuable.

    4. Re:Somebody had to sell Hitler the ovens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One question: Do you buy any electronics made in China? I thought so.

    5. Re:Somebody had to sell Hitler the ovens by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but there are plenty of cases in history where people stuck to their principles... right into the grave...

      Principles only matter if you have a chance to continue to use them and show them off, otherwise they aren't worth a hill of beans...

    6. Re:Somebody had to sell Hitler the ovens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It managed to make Google look a little less evil than they are. Maybe that was important in 2010 and they're stopping any attempt at pretending now.

    7. Re:Somebody had to sell Hitler the ovens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worthwhile to stick to principles when the actions will rally other relevant parties to follow and measure themselves against. But when all other parties instead point at the principles, start laughing, and promptly go the opposite direction, then perhaps it's worth at the very least changing the path to achieve said principles.

      While I would love to have Google won the fight back when it pulled out of China, but it's clear that it instead totally lost that fight plus much more. The question is, do you want Google to survive or not? Do you honestly feel that the world will be better without Google than with? Do you truly feel that without Google, there will be something else to spur on projects like self-driving cars and human longevity the way Google has?

      I personally think Google as a whole is still trying to do the right thing, but has matured a lot and come to grips with how the "real world" works.

  3. Only if they can run our blockade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They might get sunk--by a Confederate submarine. BOOM! Glug, glug, glug.

  4. Today's doodle links to Godwin by paiute · · Score: 2

    Google also announced that they were taking their new time machine back a few years to get into the German market, promising Mr. Hitler that they would block any Jewish-related content.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Today's doodle links to Godwin by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      How has this article been Godwin'd 3 times in the first 20 posts!

    2. Re:Today's doodle links to Godwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Jewish content? Oh wait...

  5. Well jeeze! C'mon... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Who is going to turn down that money? Please! Their little stunt made them look like idiots. Look, business is business, it's not a big stretch to *Orders are orders*..

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Well jeeze! C'mon... by bob_super · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "money has no smell" Old proverb

    2. Re:Well jeeze! C'mon... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      It smells like blood, and bad coke...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Well jeeze! C'mon... by sims+2 · · Score: 2

      Lets say you manufacture a universal translator and you want to sell it in another country they already have a local manufacturer that produces a local version that happens to only support chinese simplified to chinese traditional and back.

      Now to sell your product in their country they require you to cripple your translator that works with any language to only make fart noises unless its chinese simplified to chinese traditional or vice versa.

      On one hand it opens you up to a large underserved market.
      On the other hand manufacturing the inferior product would greatly damage your brand.

      What would you choose?

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    4. Re:Well jeeze! C'mon... by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      What would you choose?

      Whichever comes out mathematically ahead. I wouldn't have to 'choose' anything.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:Well jeeze! C'mon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually related to the Roman emperor Vespasien which created paying latrines.

  6. This is really depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But it's a fundamental property of corporations that they cannot have a heart. It doesn't matter how moral its founders or leadership were, economic realities dictate that a company must break every rule it can. If it does anything different due to moral concerns, it will have by definition deviated from the economically optimal course of action. Keep that up and it will be out-competed or swallowed by the competition.

    1. Re:This is really depressing by sims+2 · · Score: 2

      Hobby Lobby.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    2. Re: This is really depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope it's just reveals attributes of reality you don't happen to like.

      Other possible sources of disappointment:

      Google values revenue over freedom.

      Kim Davis thinks her religious freedom allows her to deny others theirs.

      Trump makes sense to over 20% of Republicans who are accessible to pollsters and willing to go on record.

      Mass market media fails to report on the dubious accuracy of current political polling efforts.

      Critical thinking skills are difficult to learn and harder to practice.

      The Free Market is conceptually false.

      The universe is expanding at an accelerating rate.

  7. Chinese economy, military parades, and their Navy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is simply ensuring that they don't find themselves without a footing in both nations should WWIII ignite. That's at least what they are telling the Chinese...

    To what extent they are loyal to the White House/State Dept./DoJ/DoD is a subject for Julian Assange to report on, but regardless of the presentation: I suspect they are playing both sides for the profit of their shareholders.

    It would be foolish to call this is a vote of "no confidence" in the future of the United States. This is a vote of "no confidence" in taking sides at all.

    Watch the news in the coming months and expect the Chinese to play the US electorate like a fiddle while Chickenhawks promise to flex their muscles by borrowing money from the Chinese. "Strong on defense"? The trade deficit is a matter of national security.

    They're gonna be all up in our Blue Water rustlin' our jimmies.
    Boy, oh boy: are some sabers gonna be rattled!

    1...2...3...Existential Crisis: Not It!

  8. of course they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever known an American company to walk away and leave a dollar on the table? It is painfull for them all their money in somebody elses pocket.

  9. Only Google could go to China by turkeydance · · Score: 4, Funny

    old Vulcan paraphrase

    1. Re:Only Google could go to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woosh! GP was just having some fun. Isn't that what slashdot is for?

  10. that's doing evil. by swschrad · · Score: 2

    if the Chinese won't allow free internet access, Google should not be there.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:that's doing evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom on the internet? That has been slowly erroding everywhere since politicians and bankers realized that they had to keep tight control on what people have to say in social and news media streams. Comment sections are quickly disappearing if you haven't noticed. Google should be everywhere it can be. If you deny the Chineese access, you are just shooting yourself in the foot in the future. I for one, applaud Google for restoring access even if it is restricted a bit more than the US and elsewhere.

    2. Re:that's doing evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is enough free internet access in China (vpn's are just an example). The shadow economy, the ultra free market, is currently larger than the official state controlled economy. The current financial problems with the state controlled economy might be the start of the end of the Chinese state controlled economy. Maybe we will witness a USSR style collapse within a few years, where they leaders of the shadow economy (who often are part of the communist regime or have close ties with that regime through bribes) take over the control of the former state controlled economies.

      When it really is the start, than Google wants to be there to be part of the ultra free market. They wouldn't want to see a Baidu in the hands of the Chinese Triad taking the monopoly of search engines in a liberated Chinese free market. When they can be part of the 'unfree' market, they can accumulate a market share for when the state collapses.

      Of course it is also possible that the state controlled economy will recover and we will see another decade or maybe a few decades of communism. But China is industrialized at the moment. Once a country is fully industrialized it no longer needs communism. If the Chinese are able to transform industrial communism into informational communism than they will probably remain communist for the next century. But I can not imagine that they are going to shut down the 'great firewall', allow free flow of information (and thus also capital), and let the people and businesses decide for themselves what they need by communicating with each other and the rest of the word. Google wants to be there to monopolize on the information. They are only regulated in what they can show to the people/businesses. But there are no rules on how they work internally. They can still save whatever they want from whoever they want.

    3. Re:that's doing evil. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Why not?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:that's doing evil. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      If, from what I've read, China gives up on communism (Maoism, really) it is unlikely to be as relatively bloodless as was the fall of the USSR. The countries within the USSR actually have some cultural history of rising up against governing bodies greater than, comparatively speaking, seen in China. My understanding may be faulty but that's what they concluded. This was a topic on an NPR show not too dreadfully long ago. There's likely to be some reduction in their authoritarian stance but a true collapse, like seen in the USSR, is unlikely and, if happens, is likely to be bloody if I understood it properly. I ended up going to the site to read the story after listening to it but, unfortunately, I don't recall the name and can't seem to find it via Google.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  11. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em. by saccade.com · · Score: 1

    Google turning their back on China didn't do much except cost them huge market share (Apple has been doing very well there). Because of all the blocks, an Android phone is almost a brick in China. Maybe they'll even fix Google maps there.

  12. Play Store? What's the point by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unfortunately the ship has sailed for Google. The App store model relies on a monopoly on the phones. China is a country where everyone has an Android phone and none of them come with the Play Store. Instead there are many alternate stores catering specifically to the Chinese market with Chinese apps. Why would you want an app store to enter the market which no one can understand?

    1. Re:Play Store? What's the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Google have sold android as open, while the app store have been a vital proprietary part. Many other phone OS's main problem is the app store.
      Apart from that, Google have also more and more removed the freedom from the user to control what an app is allowed to do.
      The last 3-4 years, they have gone further and further away from 'Do no evil', which leads us to re-entering China...
      With the recent change of morale, there is nothing left to stop them going back to China...

    2. Re:Play Store? What's the point by _merlin · · Score: 1

      Best thing about Chinese internet access is all the fucking Google trackers are blocked without the need for browser extensions. It's annoying if you're accessing a site that loads jQuery from the Google APIs server as you might have to wait for the request to time out before it will display. Seriously though, why do people even do this? Is it really that hard to host jQuery yourself?

    3. Re:Play Store? What's the point by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The answer to that is easy. Google has far more bandwidth so by linking to them not only do you decrease your own server load but your users can also access the content faster. Speaking of, there's every chance that your user already has cached the jQuery copy from Google so they may not be downloading anything new at all.

      Centralising APIs do offer advantages.

  13. don't be merely evil by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    don't be evil, be greedy.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  14. Maybe they thought it is reaonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Google caved in europe based on laws and reasons passed there, even if not accepted in other places. China has its reasoning for censorship, even if not accepted in most other places.

    If Google disagreed with the reasoning for both, how are they supposed to act?

  15. Google already kowtow to the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now tell me the bit about kowtowing to the evil again ...

  16. Google Versus China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Google exited China it was doing all the grandstanding it could - trumpeting how they refuse to 'work with the devil'

    Not long after that Google was exposed to be cooperating with the NSA - and this time, it was spying on the Americans, for NSA

    It could be said that Google's returning to China might be on the behest of the NSA --- to spy on the Chinese

  17. Slashdot: Update Your Google Icon by ZipK · · Score: 1

    Time to update to Google's new, super sleek san serif logo.

  18. While IBM looks to send H1-b's over as well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not content with decimating the US workforce in the current era, IBM would then use their own guest workers to develop and market a Hollerith machine.

  19. Expat in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've been living in China for 3 years now (close to Shanghai in Jaingsu province).

    I try to spread the word about VPN's to friends here. I've offered to help them get prepaid credit cards to pay anonymously to western service providers.

    They don't care. They don't see any value in it. They don't care about Google, Facebook, YouTube because they have their own stuff which is better for them.

    They know their news sources lie and that's bjust how it is. I know one Chinese guy (one) that uses a western VPN (Astrill).

    I use StrongVPN. It's not a great provider for privacy, ect but I've had a good experience. PPTP seems to work best if you change the host every so often. I assume because it's weak and they can get into it if you want.

    OpenVPN just doesn't work. L2TP doesn't work well at home (China Telecom) or on my mobile (China Unicom) but works great on my phone when using my employers wifi.

    I assume L2TP is functional there because we're a tax paying business and we need a VPN to bridge our LAN's so they choose not to mess with it.

    1. Re: Expat in China by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

      They know their news sources lie

      If only more westerners were prepared to accept that.

    2. Re:Expat in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I enjoy reading posts about china as they are generally more entertaining then other posts.

      All you see are post after post about how evil china is, how depressed the Chinese are, etc.
      The funny thing is almost none of them as the question "what do the Chinese think/want"?
      Why do they need facebook and google when they have their own services in their native language? More like google/facebook want to monetize the Chinese with endless streams of ads..

      If as a society the chinese dont want porn, why cant they make that choice? The US sure had issues with porn back in the day, and continue to do so with many other types of porn.

      Most posting here have never been to china, and i'd wager many dont even have a passport. This doesnt prevent them from being armchair critics and experts on a country they have never been to... based purely on their own news which is also full of lies and jingoism.

      (I own a home in Guangxi region and have been there many times).

    3. Re:Expat in China by _merlin · · Score: 1

      If as a society the chinese dont want porn, why cant they make that choice? The US sure had issues with porn back in the day, and continue to do so with many other types of porn.

      (I'm posting this from Shanghai, using a Chinese internet connection without a VPN, so I hopefully have half a clue about what I'm talking about.) China as a society doesn't seem to have a problem with porn. It isn't generally on display, but you can ask for "huang DVD" at plenty of shops and be shown a selection of skin flicks. Every night someone comes through this hotel and slips business cards advertising escort services under everyone's doors. Relatively few web sites are actually blocked, I mean 4chan with its rampant porn, gore, hate and conspiracy theories is fully accessible for fuck's sake. It's nowhere near as restricted as westerners seem to imagine.

  20. Google is another example of how Trump is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they didn't have stupid negotiators like our politicians, google woulden't be crawling back now.

  21. It is about the time by polind · · Score: 1

    I mean, this kind of PR event is meaningless after PRISM.