Slashdot Mirror


Dirty Farm Air May Ward Off Asthma In Children

sciencehabit writes: For researchers trying to untangle the roots of the current epidemic of asthma, one observation is especially intriguing: Children who grow up on dairy farms are much less likely than the average child to develop the respiratory disease. Now, a European team studying mice has homed in on a possible explanation: Bits of bacteria found in farm dust trigger an inflammatory response in the animals' lungs that later protects them from asthma. An enzyme involved in this defense is sometimes disabled in people with asthma, suggesting that treatments inspired by this molecule could ward off the condition in people.

112 comments

  1. Goin' to the farm by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Gonna breathe some of that dairy air!

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Goin' to the farm by Z00L00K · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wouldn't call the farm air dirty, it's still cleaner than the city air we have.

      The difference is that air on farms have a wider variety of bacteria (most of them harmless to humans with a working immune system), and asthma is an auto-immune disease caused by the immune system not being busy enough working on real threats and instead starts to react on all kinds of things that it shouldn't.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Goin' to the farm by Teun · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Having grown up on a farm I can vouch that farm air isn't dirty but at times it might appear to be rich to those not used to nature.
      Statistically there is an interesting correlation between the incidence of asthma and those not having been exposed to nature, this study re-enforced this relation.
      Similar relations exist between kids playing in the dirt (sand/soil) and those with less allergies.

      It's about time to further investigate such.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    3. Re:Goin' to the farm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to stress there is a relation between the two. Whether there is a causal effect remains the question. Maybe those living on a farm would not have lived there if they had asthma, creating a selection bias.

    4. Re: Goin' to the farm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spent tons of time in the hospital, in plastic tents with vaporized medicine as a kid - because of asthma attacks.
      I did end up living on a farm as a teen and then seemingly "grew out of my asthma."

    5. Re:Goin' to the farm by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Having grown up on a farm I can vouch that farm air isn't dirty but at times it might appear to be rich to those not used to nature.

      Well, define 'farm'? Is it the one from the painting? Or some more modern ag operation with a bunch of pesticides and sloppily-burned diesel, and big tires kicking the dirt up into the air? Burning the waste every year? Sometimes the air is pretty nice, sometimes it is beyond horrendous.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Goin' to the farm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grew up and worked on a farm for the first 24 years of my life. I had colds all the time that would last for 2+ months, my pollen allergies caused me to lose a month every spring and a couple of weeks during harvest.

      So, no asthma ... but god help me, I'd have almost preferred it to how bad my allergies were.

    7. Re:Goin' to the farm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is stupid.

      Ever been on a farm? The "bunch of pesticides" you mention are metered out by the DROP these days, and having made contact with (and killed) whatever pest they're designed to kill, they become inert. The stuff is incredibly expensive, and is used in the minimum possible quantities to get the job done. Without it, crops are subject to being completely killed off by weeds or insects. This tends to negatively affect the price of your soy latte.

      "Sloppily-burned diesel"? Here's a little fact for you: Farmers pay for their own diesel fuel, and the way they burn it is ANYTHING but "sloppy". It's true that the government has mandated a bunch of "clean air" regulations for new diesel engines, which causes them to use much more fuel than before (the typical 300hp tractor would produce something closer to 450hp without all of the clean-air "aids"), but that's not caused by farmers being "sloppy". In fact, the regulations have caused a huge spike in the value of machinery that predates them.

      And what "burning waste" are you actually talking about? In the entire process of planting, cultivating, spraying, and harvesting, I can't think of a single article of waste being burned. Time was when discarded seed bags were burned, which is essentially a 3'-high pile of paper burning for probably 2 minutes. And occasionally, a harvested wheat field used to be burned off to clear the stubble, which results in a grass fire that lasts 10 or 15 minutes. These days, seed comes in reusable plastic pods and delivered to the planter by a seed tender. "Less waste" is the name of the game. And wheat fields are rarely burned off nowadays, since no-till practices make it unnecessary. Again, reducing the amount of fuel used, and operating more efficiently.

      I realize it feels great to go on a tirade about something you've read about in a Greenpeace newsletter, but if you're going to do it, it's helpful to know what the fuck you're talking about.

    8. Re:Goin' to the farm by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The "bunch of pesticides" you mention are metered out by the DROP these days,

      Yes, into a tank. Then they are sprayed into the air.

      It's true that the government has mandated a bunch of "clean air" regulations for new diesel engines, which causes them to use much more fuel than before (the typical 300hp tractor would produce something closer to 450hp without all of the clean-air "aids"),

      Who told you that? They lied to you. Emissions controls don't reduce output any more. They just cost money.

      And what "burning waste" are you actually talking about? In the entire process of planting, cultivating, spraying, and harvesting, I can't think of a single article of waste being burned.

      That's because you know fuck-all, and you haven't had to drive through the rice fields on the 20 while they're burning.

      I realize it feels great to go on a tirade about something you've read about in a Greenpeace newsletter, but if you're going to do it, it's helpful to know what the fuck you're talking about.

      I live in ag country, and you are a lying piece of shit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Goin' to the farm by dawich · · Score: 1

      Dirty, no. Rich, I like that. Redolent, even. Grew up next to pig farm. Have asthma, anyway. Never want to live near pigs again.

    10. Re:Goin' to the farm by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Science has already explained why this correlation exists. The problem is that parents, especially mothers for some reason, are still stupid and try to separate their children from all sources of bacteria and viruses to such an extreme extent that they cause their children's possibly fatal allergies.
      It boils down to mothers who think entirely with their emotions are fucking stupid.

  2. Makes sense by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 2

    When you consider that the small pox vaccine originated from cow pox and current society's obsession with anti-bacterial everything.

    1. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I let my kids play in the dirt when they were very young, very rarely do they ever get sick. Then I see people trying to live in a sterile environment, and guess what? Always sick.

    2. Re:Makes sense by laurencetux · · Score: 1

      exactly this is why there are many companies that make some very fine detergents to clean the clothes after they get messy.

    3. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was so gross as a child I disgusted my parents. I remember vividly literally making mud pies under the pine trees with a pie plate, dirt, and digging up what I called "treasure"; it was buried cat feces. I gleefully made the stinkiest mud pies possible and taste-tested them.

      I picked up dead birds from the ground, played with bugs, dug under rocks, etc.

      As a middle-aged man, I can cycle 50km a day 5 days/week, my yearly check-up is perfect, my body doesn't look like the typical paunchy, tired, gray-haired people that are my counterparts.

      Is it "genetics", or a happy mix of genetics and early exposure to every micro-organism in the ground?

    4. Re:Makes sense by MacTO · · Score: 2

      If you're cycling 50 km/day, it is likely that you are making ongoing lifestyle choices that contribute to your health. You probably don't have to attribute those choices to genetics or micro-organisms.

    5. Re:Makes sense by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's quite a bit of writing about this, generally termed the hygiene hypothesis. Some is based on good research, some not.

    6. Re:Makes sense by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      This sounds a bit like the theory that children are less likely to develop allergies to common foods like milk, eggs, wheat, and so on if exposed to them at a young age. I have no idea if that's factual or not, but based on how our bodies adapt and develop immunity to common pathogens, it doesn't seem like such an outrageous theory.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    7. Re:Makes sense by Oligonicella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't attach too much but don't downplay their contribution either. Remember Jim FIxx the author of The Complete Book of Running. Heart attack while jogging at 52. Genetics and microbial exposure are part of your health makup.
      .

    8. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was so gross as a child I disgusted my parents. I remember vividly literally making mud pies under the pine trees with a pie plate, dirt, and digging up what I called "treasure"; it was buried cat feces. I gleefully made the stinkiest mud pies possible and taste-tested them.

      I picked up dead birds from the ground, played with bugs, dug under rocks, etc.

      As a middle-aged man, I can cycle 50km a day 5 days/week, my yearly check-up is perfect, my body doesn't look like the typical paunchy, tired, gray-haired people that are my counterparts.

      Is it "genetics", or a happy mix of genetics and early exposure to every micro-organism in the ground?

      I would imagine it is the fact that you cycle 50km/day. Just a wild guess.

    9. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't attach too much but don't downplay their contribution either. Remember Jim FIxx the author of The Complete Book of Running. Heart attack while jogging at 52. Genetics and microbial exposure are part of your health makup. .

      And gave inspiration to one of the best Bill Hicks jokes of all time.

    10. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a remarkable coincidence - and that's exactly what it is: coincidence.

      I wasn't a dirt child, and I almost never get sick.

      I did live on a farm, though, and I do have asthma. Make of that what you will.

    11. Re:Makes sense by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Explain the cowpox/smallpox thing. Is there actually a correlation there or did you just pull some scienceism out of thin air? Seriously, WTF? Dirty farm air and the development of vaccination have nothing to do with each other unless you want to really reach. I suppose cowpox was contracted by farm workers so there's your brain's connection.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    12. Re:Makes sense by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      There's no supposing on cowpox and people contracting it, milkmaids did get cowpox often. My mother has the scars on her hands from it from when her family lived in east-germany and they were farmers. But you're right on the rest, though there is enough circumstantial evidence to show that living in a sterile environment and not being exposed to contagions does make your immune system weaker.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    13. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A sad exception: I had a buddy who grew up on a farm, before moving to our home town. In his 30s he moved back to the family farm for a change of lifestyle, and it was there that he suffered a fatal asthma attack. I was shocked, as kids we were both somewhat asthmatic, but my friend's asthma didn't seem worse than mine. These days only experience any asthma symptoms if I catch a cold. If its a bad one I'll take some medication for a few weeks. And I still keep a non-expired ventolin around just in case of a sudden attack, which I've thankfully never had.

    14. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is experimentally confirmed. One particularly large UK study (15 years, over 20,000 children) confirms that nut allergies do not develop in children who eat nuts.

    15. Re:Makes sense by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      If you're cycling 50 km/day, it is likely that you are making ongoing lifestyle choices that contribute to your health. You probably don't have to attribute those choices to genetics or micro-organisms.

      You'll be the healthiest guy in the dementia ward.

      It's rather amusing that the biggest chemical enhanced doping sport on earth is used as an example of good health decisions.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    16. Re:Makes sense by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Genetics and microbial exposure are part of your health makup.

      As in most of it. It's weird, looking back through my family history, teh men tend to live to right around 85 years old, except for accident or war.

      My father's generation, with modern medical assistance, better health care, and healthier lifestyle choices, lived to....... 85 years old.

      The idea that doing this or that is going to make you live 30 years longer is merely wishful thinking. Moderation in all things isn't dramatic, but it's the truth.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    17. Re:Makes sense by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      This sounds a bit like the theory that children are less likely to develop allergies to common foods like milk, eggs, wheat, and so on if exposed to them at a young age. I have no idea if that's factual or not, but based on how our bodies adapt and develop immunity to common pathogens, it doesn't seem like such an outrageous theory.

      My son would get these red blotchy marks all over when we took him along with us to visit out horse. We talked to his pediatrician about it, to see what could be done, or if we should keep him away from horses. He told us to keep taking him to the barn as long as it was just the splotches. Sure enough, a few more visits, and no more reaction. The doctor said a little dirt and dander is good.

      Interestingly enough, after he hit his teens, probably 3/4 of his Ice hockey team was on inhalers for athsma, and often the children of the most affluent. I'm pretty convinced there is some relationship.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    18. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Football?

    19. Re:Makes sense by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Explain the cowpox/smallpox thing. Is there actually a correlation there or did you just pull some scienceism out of thin air? Seriously, WTF? Dirty farm air and the development of vaccination have nothing to do with each other unless you want to really reach. I suppose cowpox was contracted by farm workers so there's your brain's connection.

      People who contracted cowpox - which is a rather minor illness, were immune from smallpox, which is a major issue. And with the symptoms of smallpox being rather dramatically evident, people made the connection quickly, since the milkmaids and people around the cows had nice skin, not something that looked like the surface of Mercury.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    20. Re:Makes sense by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Cycling as a recreational activity is good for you. As a pro sport, it's as dangerous and dope-intensive as any other pro sport.

    21. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember Jim FIxx the author of The Complete Book of Running. Heart attack while jogging at 52.

      His father died at 43, so maybe the jogging helped.

      Just sayin'.

    22. Re:Makes sense by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

      As an interesting (or not) aside, if it was named small pox then there must have been a large pox disease. That was gonorrhea.

    23. Re:Makes sense by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      ...and yet we're talking about people being exposed to microbes, which is completely different from viral diseases. Again, how'd you pull that out of your ass?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    24. Re:Makes sense by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Football?

      It's prettyhard to beat bicycle racing for univerasl doping and drug use.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    25. Re:Makes sense by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      ...and yet we're talking about people being exposed to microbes, which is completely different from viral diseases. Again, how'd you pull that out of your ass?

      By following and replying within the context of the conversation thread? You know, explain it to you?

      Jesus, who the fuck peed in your Wheaties today?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    26. Re:Makes sense by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      As an interesting (or not) aside, if it was named small pox then there must have been a large pox disease. That was gonorrhea.

      No, it was syphilis.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  3. And stay out of the silo! by AndyKron · · Score: 2

    And stay out of the silo!

    1. Re:And stay out of the silo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I like pigz! And Wilber and me are moving off to Massachusetts, so we can git *married*!!!

    2. Re:And stay out of the silo! by darthsilun · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      But I like pigz! And Wilber and me are moving off to Massachusetts, so we can git *married*!!!

      Then Rowan Co., Kentucky is where you want to go.

  4. Re:What is Athma? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or computerized spell-check.... you idiot.

  5. Doesn't jive with the NPR story I heard today by darthsilun · · Score: 2

    The researcher interviewed on the NPR story said <paraphrase>living on a farm during the first year of life reduced the likelihood of having allergies later in life</paraphrase>

    He went on to say that living on a farm later in life did nothing, it had to be in the first year.

    1. Re:Doesn't jive with the NPR story I heard today by bluelip · · Score: 1

      First issue: Listening to NPR
      Last Issue: Trusting NPR

      --

      Yep, I never spell check.
      More incorrect spellings can be found he
  6. Counter-antecdote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was young, I was very social, and I got sick about twice a year.

    Then, in my 30s, I got frustrated with dating and several of my friends moved away, so I lived a single and solitary life for a good decade (online games became our new social outlet, since they span the miles). I got sick exactly twice during that ten year period, once when I broke my rules and made-out with a single mom, and once when I ate at a crowded restaurant while a cold was going around.

    So, at least in my case, the more sterile environment kept me from getting sick, and greater exposure got me sick.

    I have new friends now and kind of want to date again, so I am gearing up for the twice-a-year consequences.

    1. Re:Counter-antecdote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you're a Solarian...

    2. Re:Counter-antecdote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to do the "dirt" exposure while young, it does no good after adolescence.

  7. This is news? by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    I would gasp in surprise, but I was raised on a farm so I'll just breathe normally.

    --
    -Styopa
  8. It's cars by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it's really just car smog folks. This isn't that hard. I had to move to Phoenix for a job and I can see the effect it has. It's always funny to me to see folks trying to come up with a hundred reasons why something is something except the one they don't want it to be. Kinda like that Onion story about Americans wondering when mass shootings will end while it points out the rest of the world doesn't have this problem...

    For a start ban fast food drive throughs. Silly as it sounds card idling there are a large part of the smog problem. Then start cracking down on SUVs. People use 'em like cars, stop letting them get by with a Trucks fuel and emission standards. Discuss among yourselves the rest of the crap we can do to reduce city emissions (public transit would be nice).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:It's cars by FranTaylor · · Score: 2

      For a start ban fast food drive throughs. Silly as it sounds card idling there are a large part of the smog problem.

      it's easier to make cars smarter and it's impossible to make people smarter and expecting otherwise is a sure symptom of insanity

    2. Re:It's cars by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins

      kind of like saying "hi, I make buggy whips and whale oil lamps"

    3. Re:It's cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's impossible to make people smarter

      It's hardly impossible. It's not easy, sure, but not impossible.

      The problem is that the people in power don't want the general public to be smarter because then they might wise up and start voting in their own interests. The people with money don't want the general public to be smarter because they would be harder to exploit both as employees and consumers. The people who badly need to be smarter don't want to work at becoming smarter because it's hard and they would have to admit they aren't perfect. And those who are already smarter are too small a slice of the public to make any difference.

    4. Re:It's cars by Jeremi · · Score: 0

      Discuss among yourselves the rest of the crap we can do to reduce city emissions (public transit would be nice).

      If nothing else, sooner or later electric vehicles will be cheaper to own than gas vehicles, at which point the locally-emitted-smog problem will start to largely go away.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    5. Re:It's cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure ban SUVs and then people will buy light trucks. Already people are buying panel vans (Sprinters, the big mercedes, etc) implicitly to get around fuel economy requirements. In fact, the fuel economy requirements caused SUVs by effectively banning station waggons.

    6. Re:It's cars by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      If that was true, then people born into wealthy families would never grow up poor, and people who win the lottery would never spend it all and end up poor.

      The reality is that some people know how to manage money and make money really well, whereas most people aren't terribly successful at either one or both of those things.

    7. Re:It's cars by khallow · · Score: 1

      For a start ban fast food drive throughs.

      Better ban intersections. There's a lot more cars idling there than at the drive thru,

    8. Re: It's cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Saying you work for a company that really only makes money from sitting on a dominant placement in, say, mobile devices, insures eventual obsolecence and unemployment. Monolithic browsers are popular right now, but only so long as people trust the big companies that make them. Overcoming excessive amounts of trust is just a matter of education.

    9. Re:It's cars by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      For a start ban fast food drive throughs. Silly as it sounds card idling there are a large part of the smog problem.

      Or we could just require fast food restaurants to go even faster, so that no cars idle at all.

      The payment could just be made through something like FastTrack (or the equivalent in your country or state). You could pre-order your food before you even enter your car. In the end, you would just go to the drive thru to pick up your food and drinks. That would end up saving a ton of emissions and time.

    10. Re:It's cars by GNious · · Score: 0

      For a start ban fast food drive throughs.

      Better ban intersections. There's a lot more cars idling there than at the drive thru,

      Is why modern countries have been putting up round-abouts everywhere for the last 20+ years

    11. Re:It's cars by mrbester · · Score: 1

      And some modern countries have been doing that for 60+ years...

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    12. Re:It's cars by KGIII · · Score: 1

      A fairly close friend died recently. He died from a fatal asthma attack that, it seems, failed to wake him. He spent his entire life living in NW Maine in a town that still has fewer than 2500 people.

      Actually, Wikipedia indicates a population of 929 people in Industry, Maine.

      I'd surmise it is more than smog.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    13. Re:It's cars by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      In Maine... where you hide indoors 85% of the year because it's either cold as hell outside or the mosquito swarms are like to murder you.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    14. Re:It's cars by KGIII · · Score: 1

      True but the homes are drafty and let in the outdoor air. Additionally, we've got to go out and retrieve the firewood and hunt for food.

      Actually, it's truly a four season state. That's why I moved here when I retired. I don't take advantage of it enough but the locals do. They don't seem to mind slathering themselves in 99% deet or bundling up with 32 layers.

      Also, your number may be a bit off - you seem to have forgotten both 'mud season' and 'black flies.' I made the mistake of wearing a white long sleeved shirt when out in the early fly fishing season, before the mosquitoes come out in droves, and a friend took a picture of me in my kayak. My shirt was almost black from the flies that covered it. Lesson: Never, ever, wear white. For some reason the black flies are really attracted to it.

      But, if you're prepared then you get to enjoy all the seasons. Mud season kind of sucks but that's when the good fishing is really starting. We've had an amazingly mild summer here this year. I had two days, that I recall, where the temperature was greater than 90 and most hot days have been low 80s. Unfortunately we had a mild winter too. We had a lot of snow but no real cold weather as compared to the norm. Ah well...

      I used to come up here to hunt or vacation. It was great to be able to retire here. But, yeah, we do take risks when we venture outside. There are certain days when I absolutely refuse to go outside unless there's a very compelling reason to do so. With snow, on the other hand, I love going out in it. Driving in the snow is a favorite activity of mine. It's an art. I've found no such art for mosquitoes so slathering myself in poison (and not wearing white or other bright clothes) is my option.

      I wonder why they're attracted to white or bright colors?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    15. Re:It's cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's always funny to me to see folks trying to come up with a hundred reasons why something is something except the one they don't want it to be. Kinda like that Onion story about Americans wondering when mass shootings will end while it points out the rest of the world doesn't have this problem...

      Well, it's clearly not the guns: a number of countries in the developed world (such as New Zealand, Switzerland, and a number of countries in Scandinavia) have similar gun ownership or access.

      By your "logic", it must be something else, something obvious. Given the enormous number of differences between the USA and the other countries with high gun ownership or access, perhaps the wishful thinking is to be found in your head.

  9. Other farm cures by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I hear being gored by a bull cures hiccups.

      -1 WTF

  10. Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the "dirty farm air" that makes you have asthma.. It's the air pollution in the city. Second hand smoke, car exhaust and pollution from the factories... All of that, while you're in the womb... and then in the first few years of your life... It's bad for your lungs.
    There's next to none of that on a farm. The "dirty farm air" is just air that smells like sh*t, it's not actually "dirty", unlike the city's air.

    1. Re:Of course... by ledow · · Score: 1

      Additionally, smelly farm air is exactly what our noses and lungs have dealt with for millions of years. Excrement, grass, mud, soil, etc.

      Now we have things much finer, much more damaging, non-degrading, synthetic, toxic, etc. and shockingly our lungs can't cope with it. Even household dust no longer has anywhere near the same make-up as it used to.

      "Dirt", "grass", "mud", etc. on the floor isn't what will kill your kid. It'll be the "clean air" they live in 24 hours a day next to the road, inside their double-glazing, with no filter between them and the cars and shit outside, and those fucking anti-bacterial wipes.

    2. Re:Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting logical fallacy you have there. Shame if something were to happen to it.

      Evolutionary pressure and survival of the fittest doesn't mean what you seem to think it means. Evolution doesn't happen this way.

  11. Living inside a totally antiseptic bubble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People today has a really weird notion - that if they can live in a totally germ-free environment they will enjoy good health

    Professionals - even some DOCTORS - believe that

    I do not know if that is the result of a total breakdown in communication, or people are simply stupid in nature

    1. Re:Living inside a totally antiseptic bubble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Choice # 2.

    2. Re:Living inside a totally antiseptic bubble by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      I will also agree with the second answer.

  12. Farm Dust for sale ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Entrepreneurs, listen up!

    Here's a guaranteed way to make big bucks !

    All you need to do is to Sell our marvellous ""Farm Dust (TM)"

    Parents with new born babies will pay anything for you to supply our "Farm Dust (TM)"

    Don't wait - call 1-800-FARMDST now!

  13. Some hindus drink Cow urine. by espre · · Score: 1

    Some Indians (particularly some Hindus) consider Cow urine as having medicinal properties - according to Vedas. So they use cow urine in some ritualistic drinks. :). Sounds funny, but it may have some basis though it may not have written scientific reasoning. The western "rationalized drug discovery" is relatively new compared to other drug-discovery-by-just-observation.

    1. Re:Some hindus drink Cow urine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like that "Here, eat this root..." pseudo-joke that makes the rounds every so often, and it ends with science saying "Here, eat this root," no matter how fucking wrong it is.

    2. Re:Some hindus drink Cow urine. by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Urine has ammonia. And ammonia does have some medicinal properties according to western science. There is actually nothing weird about that.

    3. Re:Some hindus drink Cow urine. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      There is actually nothing weird about that.

      Yeah there is....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  14. Speaking as an asthmatic by ihtoit · · Score: 2

    I can't agree more with this. Countryside air is a lot easier to deal with than city air. The biggest mistake I ever made was moving back to the city. I should've stayed on the coast, where the offshore wind was clean and crisp, onshore blew over a dairy farm and while it smelled like a cow's bum, at least I could sleep through the night without bolting upright at Dark O'clock for a blast on the salbutamol..

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    1. Re:Speaking as an asthmatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just an aside: your description is very confusing. Did you reverse "onshore" and "offshore" or did you have dairy farms on the beach between the sea and your coastal residence? An "onshore wind" is a wind blowing from the water onto the land and would normally be cool and clean. An "offshore" is the opposite which would normally carry the dirt and dust of the land back out to sea...

    2. Re:Speaking as an asthmatic by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      wrong. An offshore wind is one which originates offshore. An onshore wind is one which originates inland. The confusion is yours.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    3. Re:Speaking as an asthmatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I'm curious what culture you are from... maybe this is one of those things that doesn't translate. See for example the wikipedia article for "onshore breeze", which seems to match the usage here in California. It also mentions a different usage "offshore wind" which just means over water and doesn't imply directionality.

  15. There's only one thing to say . . . by jthill · · Score: 1
    --
    As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
  16. The cause of asthma is stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asthma is treated by administering derivatives of adrenaline and cortisol. Those are stress hormones. Did it ever occur to any genius scientist that asthma may be stress-related?

    Of course not, because the health of our body has nothing to do with what's going on psychologically, right?

    The cause of asthma is stress. Children of stressed parents are stressed. Children are so stressed that the production of their stress hormones becomes exhausted, and they must be administered adrenaline and cortisol externally.

    Kids who grow up in a stressful environment are usually stressed for the rest of their lives. They don't even know they're stressed, because it's always been that way for them.

    Farms may be a less stressful environment. It has nothing to do with the air. What a ridiculous piece of crap research, as always with medical science.

    1. Re:The cause of asthma is stress by ledow · · Score: 2

      We also administer adrenaline when your heart stops.

      Has nobody thought that the cause of heart disease might be stress?

      Fucking idiot. You can't work backwards from a treatment to work out the cause like that without doing a lot of research, and that will tell you the real cause.

      Asthma is a lung condition. The "treatment" is to induce a panic in the body (without a panic in the patient, hopefully) to open up the airways, increase the bloodflow and let them breathe and get oxygen where it's needed because the lungs can't do it enough on their own. It's literally about allowing them to live through the attack, not curing the cause.

      Asthma is also entirely linked to environmental causes, with air particulates and quality being one of the main factors implicated (i.e. sterility and/or pollutants - air fresheners and aerosols are highly implicated too). It's almost certainly an immune response to that environment too.

      Children today are no more stressed than for the centuries they were shoved up chimneys to clean them, "to be seen and not heard" or just plain abused as a matter of course. A prescribed education in a child-safe environment for 18-20 years followed by 40 hours a day of work is fucking NOTHING compared to previous generations - especially pre-industrialisation - and they had significantly less asthma even adjusted for lifespan.

    2. Re:The cause of asthma is stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny that you draw an example of adrenaline being used for heart attacks, because there is research out there showing a much stronger link between heart disease and stress than other symptoms such as blood pressure or cholesterol levels.

      Stress hormones indeed open up the airways. They are meant to be released in the body for a short duration of time, for increased alertness in threatening situations. The modern condition of chronic stress exhausts the mechanisms for stress hormone production. Poor air quality narrows down airways, in which case stress hormones are supposed to kick in, which doesn't happen, and we have a condition labeled 'asthma'.

      Air quality has improved compared to when kids were shoved up chimneys, while asthma rates have gone up.

      Kids are more stressed these days than they used to. Stress is often unrecognized due to its chronic nature. It's passed on from generation to generation (there are explanations for how this works), and people are never treated for it, because society does not recognize it as a problem, it is considered normal, and symptoms such as asthma, ADHD and heart attacks are treated like problems of the body. Of course these problems also have other factors (air pollution for asthma, over-stimulation for ADHD, poor diet for heart attacks), but I claim chronic stress is the main cause for all of these. Society doesn't know how to treat chronic stress, because chronic stress is a direct result of society itself.

      From personal experience, I've known 2 people who had asthma (it's not very common in my country), and they both had a very emotionally challenging childhood.

      There are reports of a people being permanently cured of their life-long asthma after a session of ayahuasca. An ayahuasca session is often described by participants as "a weight dropping off one's shoulders" AKA relief from chronic stress. (stress they often/always did not even know they had)

      Medical science is both ideological and unscientific. The ideology is that body can and should be separated from the mind. It's unscientific because there is a ton of scientific evidence showing that mind and body are inseparable. There are so many examples and it has been shown over and over again.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not blaming the people who did this research, maybe they have good intentions, who knows. I just think they're on the wrong track entirely.

      And take it easy man, you sound a little stressed.

    3. Re:The cause of asthma is stress by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Farms may be a less stressful environment.

      You have obviously never worked or lived on a farm. Farming is hard work, and frequently highly stressful. Regularly working 90 or 100 hour weeks is stressful in itself, and this is not uncommon during busy periods on a farm.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:The cause of asthma is stress by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      40 hours a day of work is fucking NOTHING compared to previous generations

      Right. I had to get up in the morning at ten o'clock at night, half an hour before I went to bed, eat a lump of cold poison, work twenty-nine hours a day down mill, and pay mill owner for permission to come to work, and when we got home, our Dad would kill us, and dance about on our graves singing "Hallelujah."

      But you try and tell the young people today that... and they won't believe you.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  17. Cow urine.is only for the dead ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hindus do use cow urine, but only for the dead !!!

    They 'purify' the dead by wiping cow urine on the corpse

    How I know? I asked my Hindu friends

    One time I saw bottled cow urine on the shelves in an Indian shop - and those bottled cow urine were certainly *NOT* freish urine, which prompted me to ask several of my Hindu friends about cow urine

    1. Re:Cow urine.is only for the dead ! by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Hindus do use cow urine, but only for the dead !!!

      Not true. If you watch the TV show Bizarre Foods, the host has been served cow urine at least once in India under the guise of "medicine"

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Cow urine.is only for the dead ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you watch bizarre foods relatively often, you also realize about half of what he eats, the locals won't put in their mouths.

  18. A farm environment has many factors at play here by seoras · · Score: 0

    I grew up on a farm and I have asthma. I would have put it down to the consumption of raw, unpasteurised milk by farmers and their families.
    A farm raised child eats much more unprocessed food and is exposed to much higher levels of bacteria.
    The theory that asthma is a modern disease caused by living in a world that's too clean makes a lot of sense.
    We've descended from people who survived due to their strong immune defence.
    This inherited army needs a fight and when it has nothing better to do it attacks it's own.
    Maybe this theory is correct and the farm dust that prevents asthma.
    It didn't help me as dust isn't something you see much of when you grow up on a farm in Scotland where it rains 351 days of the year. :-/

  19. Not news by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    An old Italian tradition was to take babies to farms to smell the air. Occasionally old people with an ailment would do it too.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Not news by evanh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I thought it was common knowledge that asthma was due to environmental training, or rather the lack of.

    2. Re:Not news by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Recall that in 'old Italy' (or London or Trenton, NJ) the cities were total pigsties. Horses, pigs, dogs, people crapping all over the place. Running water only in some places. Treated sewage nowhere.

      Farms were places of pristine nature, relatively speaking.

      I think you all have this backwards.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  20. Children who play and work outside all day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    instead of spending their time in front of a TV/computer are more healthy. Who would have thunk it?

  21. When I was a kid.... by Computershack · · Score: 1

    We used to play outside, eat mud, get covered in dirt and our bodies built up an immunity to a lot of things. Nowadays kids spend their time glued to a TV, laptop or games console and their parents have houses with higher than hospital levels of cleanliness so the resistance to stuff we built up as kids never happens. When they're then exposed to the outside world they then catch all kinds of nasty stuff.

    --
    I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
  22. Nice to know. by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    Nice to know. If in the future, somebody asks me: "Have you been raised in a barn?" when I failed to close the door, I can say: "Yes, that's why I don't have any Asthma."

  23. Yes we already know this research something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well done, you've figured out something we all knew about from anecdotal as well as scientific evidence.
    There seems to be a slew of "well duh we already knew that" research going on at the moment, perhaps purely for profit.

  24. I doubt that by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Or their ancestors decided not to be farmers if they had asthma. A genetic defect preventing the creation of a certain response usually isn't environmentally caused, it's solely genetic.

  25. It's actually not hard to make people smarter by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 2

    Average intelligence of people worldwide today is higher than it was.

    1) Better nutrition
    2) Better medical care
    3) Reduced disease burden
    4) Elimination of environmental toxins (lead for one!)

    So no, it's actually not impossible AT ALL to make people smarter, though it may be impossible to make an individual such as yourself smarter..... But who knows, in a few years there might be a pill.

    --PM

    1. Re:It's actually not hard to make people smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Average intelligence of people worldwide today is higher than it was.

      Facebook, YouTube and 4chan would like a word with you....

  26. Or it's genetic by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Still possible that farmers with asthma just don't hold up to reproduce as often - that selection would probably take less than a few hundred years.

  27. Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I grew up on a farm, and experienced the various smells there. Now I work in another area with mostly "non-farm" types, and I'm surprised at how delicate some of them are. They're constantly sneezing, slathering their hands with anti-bacterial gel, suffering allergies, wheezing, calling in sick, and are generally sort of weak. "Here, help me pick up this desk, it's almost 50 pounds!" The ones from rural areas (farms or not) seem generally stouter.

  28. I've read that if you live near woods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Or rather a forrest, you gain higher immune response http://www.bing.com/search?q=f...

    Since your system's under "attack" from pollens etc. - so, this *MAY* make some sense also, albeit, not for exactly the same reasons but other "colloidally suspended" particles in the air due to farming/animals (like possibly their dander etc. - et al).

    * I grew up right next to a farm as a boy (birth to 13) & KNOW the terrible smells of a CHICKEN COOP being cleaned (it's nasty, doesn't smell like cow dung, that's perfume by comparison)... wouldn't surprise me if germs feel the SAME way about it (it's nauseating) & they run too!

    APK

    P.S.=> Anyhow - I thought I'd share that part about being near a forrest/wood allegedly boosting your immune system as well... apk

  29. Use better genes instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of going to farms.
    How about you find the genes where not being exposed to dirty farm air does not cause asthma while keeping other benefits of dirty farm air exposure.
    Then make gene therapy for adding those genes too people!
    Better than having to go to farms and smell the pig butts!

  30. Raw Milk? by AlanObject · · Score: 1

    It has been established that children that consume clean raw milk have much lower rates of asthma than the general population. The explanation given is that the active microbes in raw milk help build the body's immune system which has much more to do with gut flora than previously known.

    I know this has no scientific experience but I know that since I have been drinking raw milk, starting 10 years ago at age 49, I get sick much less often than I used to.

  31. Real farms! by LienRag · · Score: 1

    Remember that this study is european, so they're talking about real dairy farms (or something like that), not The Meatrix...

  32. Dirty air in pill form by dmt0 · · Score: 1

    Typical example of the way our industry works. While the problem was found with the way of life and the fact that we isolate ourselves from nature. Instead finding the way to bring nature back into our life, the solution is to take this part of nature, put it into a pill form and monetize the hell out of it. What else is new...

  33. Farmer's Lung is often lethal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send all your kids to farms where they can catch Farmer's Lung: http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/diseases/farmers_lung.html