Slashdot Mirror
John McAfee Pondering Presidential Bid
An anonymous reader writes: Since this U.S. presidential election cycle clearly isn't chaotic enough already, it seems John McAfee is now considering a campaign as well. Wired reports that McAfee hasn't decided for sure yet, and he's hoping to persuade somebody more charismatic to run with his backing. He said his advisors are pressing him to run, adding, "I have many thousands of emails saying please run for President. It's not something I would just choose to do on my own." What would his platform be? It actually sounds pretty simple: "It's clear that the leadership of our country is illiterate on the fundamental technology that supports everything in life for us now, that is cyber science, our smartphones, our military hardware, our communications." He'd be a strong proponent for privacy and autonomy. We should know in a few days whether McAfee is in or out — Wired says he "seems far more concerned with having his voice heard on one particular issue than with taking a seat in the Oval Office."
Something seems to have changed his mind about politics: in a 2014 interview here, McAfee said. "I would never run for office, neither would I want to be in office, of any kind. I would rather drive a nail through my foot." According to the paperwork McAfee has filed, he is founding a new party (PDF).
I want to know which party he'd run under. Or if he would be independent.
Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
This is a front page story.
Obliteracy: Words with explosions
Most of the other candidates are batshiat crazy, why not throw John into that mix?
Solving Unix problems since 1989...
No, the President does not require a security clearance.
He has access to virtually all information by virtue of his Constitutional office.
He has access to virtually all information by virtue of his Constitutional office.
You'd think so, but there have been times when the President was removed from "need to know" on various bits of information.
The cracking of the Japanese code in WWII was withheld from FDR for a time, and other information has been withheld from time to time.
That being said, your statement is generally true.
I'm thinking Charlie Sheen. Together, they've probably done more drugs than half the country combined. It'd certainly be entertaining!
No, the President does not require a security clearance. He has access to virtually all information by virtue of his Constitutional office.
Yeah, something tells me the POTUS position kinda gets a pass on the whole background investigation thing.
It certainly will have to if Hillary is somehow elected.
Business leaders should spend at least 4 years as a representative in Congress or a state governor in my opinion, and show aptitude there. Running government and dealing with politics is too different from the private sector. You have to learn how to compromise and persuade, not just order around underlings to carry out your vision your way.
This also applies to Trump, Carly, and Carson.
Table-ized A.I.
I wonder if he has also reconsidered his position on driving a nail through his foot?
lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
"Most of the other candidates are batshiat crazy, why not throw John into that mix?"
Here's how I would do it: In every election, place McAfee by default onto both the Republican and Democratic candidate list. The parties would have to go to special trouble to delete him from the list each time before someone better could be run. Deleting him would not be tat easy, either; it would take a special "removal tool."
Wasn't he a fugitive from murder charges, and also not born in the US. Only slightly better presidential option than Trump.
(If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
Maybe the US should just consider picking someone at random. Just write a program that takes all adults that meet the criteria for president (age, born in the US, etc) and select one. Can't be worse than what's going on now. And as a added bonus US carbon emissions will plummet since there won't be all of the campaigning.
Larry Lessig is looking for a running mate, so that he can resign in favor of the VP after reforming the electoral system.
I'm gonna need a spec.
The background check is accomplished during the election campaign. People who oppose a candidate will delve into that persons background in depth looking for the slightest abnormality or perceived wrongdoing to gain electoral advantage. There is nothing the FBI, NSA, CIA, DIA, or any of the other state security services can discover that cannot be discovered by the general public. The closer a person gets to being elected the harder his opponents will look for any thing to derail that persons chances of being elected.
1. No, they're not ineligible.
2. John McAfee isn't a felon.
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
"Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
They ask about your drug usage over the past 7 years. I just went through the process. As long as you aren't currently doing them nor have done them recently, its usually a pass.
Yep, I know I'd want a guy who's voluntarily played Russian Roulette to occupy the presidency.
two reasons:
1) he's not a pansy
2) he does not scare easily
being somewhat serious, for a moment, we have 'leaders' who continue to play the "be afraid! all the fucking time!" card. they now govern by fear and we lose rights more and more as those jerks continue to screw us over for their own good.
I'd like to have someone in office say 'life is hard, its unsafe by definition and by nature and we are not going to legislate you into a 100% safe society.'
not saying HE would be the guy, but someone who takes a few risks is more trustable, to me, than some think-of-the-children perl-clutcher. (oops, I mean pearl.)
--
"It is now safe to switch off your computer."