Please accept our apologies for prematurely updating your profile status. Please be assured the status has been corrected, and will be updated at the appropriate time on Tuesday.
Sincerely, Facebook
I have seen a great deal repeating, sharing and believing of these stories, I find it hard to believe that these weren't enough to sway quite a few people.
Their original content is 9/10 of what we watch, without it I don't think my family would continue to subscribe.
Their movie selection is pretty lousy, and not getting any better, I'm sure the stiff competition limits what they can offer.
Anecdotal story of one company, and likely bought and paid for by Apple. If you are really paying that much to maintain your PCs then you a bigger issue on your hands with how you are setting them up and deploying them. Since this is IBM, that is very likely the case, under the constant threat of 'resource actions' much of their higher skilled workers have moved onto more stable pastures.
This is 'almost' as bad as Sony root-kitting peoples PCs to prevent copying.
Not quite as bad, but now I see Samsung in same sleazy slimy light I see Sony.
He implies there is some sort of correlation to banks making donations, and tarp funds being distributed.
Does $1000 seem like an appropriate bribe for a billion dollars?
And since when does the secretary of state have any impact on where tarp funds are distributed?
And what's the freaking point when this money is used for charity anyhow, it's not like they are buying paintings of themselves with it.
Think of the people who receive/re-ship stolen merchandise that were most likely purchased with stolen credit cards. Can they really argue, that they are just performing a service like a mailboxes etc, and not committing a crime?
They need to learn the lesson from World of Warcraft. Take a LOT of that early money, and make more and more content. Also respond quickly to negative feedback/bugs etc.
A courteous employer, that cashes out unused Time off, provides severance when laying off employees, even gives a heads up that layoffs might come in bad times, deserves an effort on your part to minimize the impact of your departure. An employer who doesn't pay out all of the left over vacation time, or lays folks off without severance, or is abusive, you can still be the bigger person, but it's not necessary.
There was a warrant, the fight was whether or not the warrant was legit,and the ruling was 'Yes'.
From the PDF on EFFs site:
The Court held hearings to address these Motions on May 19, 2016, May 26, 2016, and
June 14, 2016. The Court FINDS, for the reasons stated herein, that probable cause supported
the warrant's issuance, that the warrant was sufficiently specific, that the triggering event
occurred, that Defendant is not entitled to a Franks hearing, and that the magistrate judge did not
exceed her jurisdiction or authority in issuing the warrant
Because I think those provisions stand in the way of warning others of a crappy company.
Where stuffy British politicians argue over what is 'non-conventional' without blushing.
And you will have the old outdated one.
Please accept our apologies for prematurely updating your profile status. Please be assured the status has been corrected, and will be updated at the appropriate time on Tuesday. Sincerely, Facebook
I have seen a great deal repeating, sharing and believing of these stories, I find it hard to believe that these weren't enough to sway quite a few people.
That's a pretty massive savings. here come the blocks!
Can it be done fairly and with so much transparency that folks wouldn't confuse it with censorship? It's worth trying.
Their original content is 9/10 of what we watch, without it I don't think my family would continue to subscribe. Their movie selection is pretty lousy, and not getting any better, I'm sure the stiff competition limits what they can offer.
Much prefer someone fly their drone in, than run into a building shooting, or getting shot.
Anecdotal story of one company, and likely bought and paid for by Apple. If you are really paying that much to maintain your PCs then you a bigger issue on your hands with how you are setting them up and deploying them. Since this is IBM, that is very likely the case, under the constant threat of 'resource actions' much of their higher skilled workers have moved onto more stable pastures.
This is 'almost' as bad as Sony root-kitting peoples PCs to prevent copying. Not quite as bad, but now I see Samsung in same sleazy slimy light I see Sony.
Ask him if he could eat poop and die please.
He implies there is some sort of correlation to banks making donations, and tarp funds being distributed. Does $1000 seem like an appropriate bribe for a billion dollars? And since when does the secretary of state have any impact on where tarp funds are distributed? And what's the freaking point when this money is used for charity anyhow, it's not like they are buying paintings of themselves with it.
Think of the people who receive/re-ship stolen merchandise that were most likely purchased with stolen credit cards. Can they really argue, that they are just performing a service like a mailboxes etc, and not committing a crime?
That apprehension will fade fast, and folks will get to enjoy that time more.
If not they need any public funding withdrawn, and get the ITT Treatment with regards to student loans.
Goodness knows this one stunk before it ever started.
A %17 pullback after doubling? seriously, that's not hardly a plummet
They need to learn the lesson from World of Warcraft. Take a LOT of that early money, and make more and more content. Also respond quickly to negative feedback/bugs etc.
That's a pretty quotable remark your kid made :-)
A courteous employer, that cashes out unused Time off, provides severance when laying off employees, even gives a heads up that layoffs might come in bad times, deserves an effort on your part to minimize the impact of your departure. An employer who doesn't pay out all of the left over vacation time, or lays folks off without severance, or is abusive, you can still be the bigger person, but it's not necessary.
They are arguing that they will still be relevant, when the vast majority of their usefulness evaporates.
Good argument, Certainly won't change the verdict in this case, but yea that wording is BS.
so this is legit.
There was a warrant, the fight was whether or not the warrant was legit,and the ruling was 'Yes'. From the PDF on EFFs site: The Court held hearings to address these Motions on May 19, 2016, May 26, 2016, and June 14, 2016. The Court FINDS, for the reasons stated herein, that probable cause supported the warrant's issuance, that the warrant was sufficiently specific, that the triggering event occurred, that Defendant is not entitled to a Franks hearing, and that the magistrate judge did not exceed her jurisdiction or authority in issuing the warrant