Slashdot Mirror


Interviews: Ask John McAfee About His Presidential Run

samzenpus writes: He's run a multi-billion dollar company and hidden in the jungles of Central America while being chased by Belizean authorities, but John McAfee's presidential bid may be his most interesting adventure yet. Last week John said: "Our government is in a dysfunctional state. It is also illiterate when it comes to technology. Technology is not a tool that should be used for a government to invade our privacy. Technology should not be the scapegoat when we fail to protect our digital assets and tools of commerce. These are matters of priorities," when announcing his run. According to his Cyber Party website: "Donkeys and elephants just don't make sense in the modern world. If the federal bureaucracy adopts technology in a meaningful way, it will become much easier to adapt to changes in policy or procedure. 10 hour long congressional hearings will no longer be needed for a simple change in workflow. By adapting a lean approach to government, the amount of savings that can be realized by improved efficiency will eliminate the need for wholesale changes to foundational policies. Other parties consistently lag behind trends in technology – Cyber Party members are committed to staying ahead of the curve and remaining proactive in policymaking." John has agreed to answer any questions you have about his step into politics or any other questions you may have. As usual, ask as many as you'd like, but please, one question per post.

157 comments

  1. NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You ask him!

  2. Ahen,, by JMJimmy · · Score: 0

    Are you insane?

    1. Re:Ahen,, by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Are you insane?

      Yes, he is.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Ahen,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. Still better than the likely alternatives.

    3. Re:Ahen,, by Todd+Palin · · Score: 2

      Anyone that runs for President is insane. It's sort of a job requirement. Certainly, being insane wouldn't disqualify anyone. So, yes, he is qualified to run for President on that criteria.

  3. What will you do when you become president? by Kohath · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What is your agenda for the first 100 days of the McAfee administration?

    1. Re:What will you do when you become president? by halivar · · Score: 5, Funny

      And will be be able to uninstall after that date?

    2. Re:What will you do when you become president? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Or will it be come corrupted, leaving the installer to pull it out piece by piece?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:What will you do when you become president? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or will it be come corrupted, leaving the installer to pull it out piece by piece?

      Gosh, I hate 2nd-amendment uninstalls. So gory.

    4. Re:What will you do when you become president? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I just tend to nuke-and-pave. Yes, it's excessive, but results are guaranteed :)

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  4. Nuclear Power using LFTR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    John, what is your position on Nuclear Power?

    Would you support the re-opening of research into liquid fluoride thorium reactors. These reactor designs, and the thorium fuel cycle were researched back in the 70's and can solve both our energy crisis, be far more environmentally friendly than uranium based fuel cycles, and can even used 'spent' uranium reactor fuel as fuel sources, allowing us to reprocess our vast quantity of spent fuel into less harmful waste, while also capturing the energy from them (instead of having it wasted heating water in spent fuel ponds).

    1. Re:Nuclear Power using LFTR by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Would you support the re-opening of research into liquid fluoride thorium reactors.

      As much as this question is flamebait, the truth is that many people smarter than me see these types of reactors as the only really feasible way out of the environmental mess that we're in. They reduce the need to release carbon, and at the same time clean up the mess that light water reactors leave behind.

      I would support a presidential candidate on this basis alone.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    2. Re:Nuclear Power using LFTR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did not intend this question as flamebait (although I suppose it could be read that way)

      This is a serious question, about the future of nuclear power, which could be made cleaner, safer, and implemented in a more meaningful way through the use of LFTR generation 4 reactors, which also reduce proliferation since the thorium fuel cycle does not produce useful materials for nuclear weapons.

    3. Re:Nuclear Power using LFTR by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      This is really a more generic question about energy subsidies. Thorium needs many billions from goverment to be commercially viable (why else do you think it isn't happening?), but there is also great demand from other technologies. Is Thorium the best way to spend that money, or would some other renewable system be better? Storage tech perhaps. Or just no subsidies for anyone, let them stand on their own merits.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  5. From Defcon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...how do you think recorded footage of you from the strip club party you organized at Defcon this year might impact your run?

  6. Yeah, I'll get right on that by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I'll get right on that....because I really care about what this aging crack addict thinks about foreign policy.

    (sigh) Just kill me now. Please.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Yeah, I'll get right on that by LaurenCates · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, well, look, with Donald Trump running (and having momentum), running for president is now officially a free-for-all.

      If I was rich and nobody's told me "no" in a decade or two, I'm sure I could be convinced that I could run for president while balancing random fruits on my head and calling my party the "Hell no to GMOs" party.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    2. Re:Yeah, I'll get right on that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      (sigh) Just kill me now. Please.

      This is probably the #1 thing not to say to John McAfee.

    3. Re:Yeah, I'll get right on that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If I was rich and nobody's told me "no" in a decade or two, I'm sure I could be convinced that I could run for president while balancing random fruits on my head and calling my party the "Hell no to GMOs" party.

      The Green party is on most ballots already, it's just that nobody votes for them.

    4. Re:Yeah, I'll get right on that by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      Yeah, well, look, with Donald Trump running (and having momentum), running for president is now officially a free-for-all.

      It used to be that people asked themselves if they should run for the office of president, now they ask themselves, "Why shouldn't I run for president?"

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    5. Re:Yeah, I'll get right on that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... what an open mind you have!

      No, you're right. Foreign policy is much better left to habitual liars that take millions of dollars to fuck you in the ass. Just choose one of the above - its worked so well up until now.

  7. Serious questions for a serious candidate. by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 3, Funny

    In your opinion, what are the societal implications of electing an alleged murdering drug addict to the office of President? As a followup, if elected will you install a stripper pole in the oval office?

    --

    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    1. Re:Serious questions for a serious candidate. by quantaman · · Score: 1

      In your opinion, what are the societal implications of electing an alleged murdering drug addict to the office of President? As a followup, if elected will you install a stripper pole in the oval office?

      Odd he's starting his own party.

      It sounds like he's the one who could finally challenge Trump in the Republican primary!

      --
      I stole this Sig
    2. Re:Serious questions for a serious candidate. by sls1j · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that the situation with the last 3 presidents? It's just more of the same.

    3. Re:Serious questions for a serious candidate. by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

      In your opinion, what are the societal implications of electing an alleged murdering drug addict to the office of President? As a followup, if elected will you please install a stripper pole in the oval office?

      ftfy

    4. Re:Serious questions for a serious candidate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " what are the societal implications of electing an alleged murdering drug addict to the office of President? "

      No different than before?

    5. Re:Serious questions for a serious candidate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Murder never stopped Ted Kennedy... I guess as long as they don't make it past the senate we're OK. And that innocent until proven guilty thing... so 19th century. I guess I need to get with the times.

      Oh, and drugs are bad.

  8. What's your stand on Confederate submarines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really. It's no more insane than his campaign. I'm not even going to waste a torpedo on this one. Glug, glug, glug all by itself. No BOOM for you!

  9. technology? by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that's the least of a president's worries. Trade, strategic alliances, military actions, departments of education, transportation, etc.......

    never vote for someone just because they "understand technology", and the fundamental problems of the USA even regarding privacy are not in the realm of technology, but rather of who really wields power. Someone who doesn't understand corporate fascism will only become part of the problem

    1. Re:technology? by micahraleigh · · Score: 2

      Herbert Hoover understood technology. He was our only engineer president.

      To make a long story short ... voters became less interested in engineers after his administration.

    2. Re:technology? by Qzukk · · Score: 2

      Or, to put it differently: If we're going to become issues voters and only vote on the technology issue, why should we vote for you instead of Lawrence Lessig?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I thought Carter's B.S. from Annapolis was in engineering.

    4. Re:technology? by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      never vote for someone just because they "understand technology",

      Also keep in mind that if someone makes decisions about technology that you don't like, they probably know exactly what they are doing.
      They have someone on staff who can explain. You want someone who supports your position, not necessarily someone who "understands technology"

    5. Re:technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Lessig fronting a voting reform platform rather than a tech one?

    6. Re:technology? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      But he understood other things too, He was Secretary of Commerce under Harding and worked on relationships between banks, government, business, labor

    7. Re:technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      another "true story" ruined by an eyewitness.

    8. Re:technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >why should we vote for you instead of Lawrence Lessig?

      Possibly because he's not planning to bail out immediately after getting elected.

    9. Re:technology? by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      Ah, you are a student of history. Yes, he was also involved with a number of charities. Roosevelt asked him to run as a Democrat. I think he almost might have, but he replied saying the only Democrat he knew in the Iowa town he grew up in was a drunkard. They started making whiskey cheaper in those days.

    10. Re:technology? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Or I'm old; I wasn't around when he was president but was alive when he was writer

    11. Re:technology? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      No it was an uspecified Bachelor of Science degree. He took six month reactor operator training after that. People might be confused as to the term "engineering officer" aboard a nuclear sub, but that is not a designer type of "engineer". A train engine operator type of engineer is closer to truth

    12. Re:technology? by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      Wow. I'm going to tell me wife about that. That's my way of saying I find that remarkable.

  10. Cyber Policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Will your cabinet be allowed to WFH?

  11. Nuclear Fusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    John, what is your position on Nuclear Fusion?

    Would you support increased funding for US participation in ITER? I believe increased funding would allow ITER to achieve it's goals faster. Would you also support alternative programs for researching fusion, including the re-opening of the NIF (National Ignition Facility) which was exploring inertial confinement fusion?

    Clearly, the US can afford such massive undertakings, just be switching its priorities from war (military spending) to peace (energy research)

    If we had near unlimited free energy, there is a lot we could do to help the planet, including completely phasing out coal, natural gas, and oil for electrical production.

    1. Re:Nuclear Fusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does sending tax dollars to ITER relate to advancing nuclear fusion?

      Also, why did you capitalize Nuclear Fusion?

    2. Re:Nuclear Fusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supporting nuclear fusion research through sending more money to ITER would obviously advance nuclear fusion

      See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER

      As for capitalizing nuclear fusion, that was simply copy/paste, and not intentional.

  12. 1 issue candidate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't want to be overly critical with this question as many other candidates can be cast under this umbrella as well (Donald with immigration, Bernie with ridiculous spending policy, Hillary with illegal email is ok... etc).

      Aside from the obviously important issues of information security what are you other positions and although you may not have been able to articulate a complete platform by now who might you share positions with on other issues (between say Ron Paul, and John McCain). I'd also accept more general theories like economic theory of Keynes vs Smith.

  13. Will You Legalize ALL drugs?? by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

    Please say 'YES'. I will forgive your shitty software escapades if you do.

  14. Not a question, but a suggestion: by bistromath007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Make sure you have a big presence on chan boards. Get memes made about you, and generally continue being your awesome-ridiculous self. Don't act professional for the sake of your campaign. That isn't what millenials want, and they are the ones you can get to vote for you if you do your marketing right. Think about that. Millenials might actually vote. All you have to do is entertain them. Get yourself made fun of on John Oliver repeatedly. Be a bigger cartoon character than Donald Trump. You can do this. I believe in you. You're the closest we could ever get to President Zaphod Beeblebrox. Please make it happen.

    1. Re:Not a question, but a suggestion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if your suggesting millennials are behind the rise of Trump or not...
      If that's what you're thinking, you're wrong.
      Something like 2% of trump supporters are under the age of 30, something like 85% are older than 45.
      half earn less than $50,000 a year, and 2/3rds have a high school education, or lower.

      http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/09/09/who_are_trumps_supporters.html

      Trump supporters are poor boomers who haven't achieved a higher education.

    2. Re:Not a question, but a suggestion: by bistromath007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, those are just the actual Trump supporters. He has far more ironic supporters. People my age are thoroughly addicted to sarcasm. Hell, before I heard about McAfee running, I was thinking about voting for Trump. He'd be such a terrible president that he might actually destabilize the federal government, which is a huge net gain despite whatever ridiculous bullshit he'd do to get us there.

      If my vote would be mostly a joke anyway, I'd like it to be a joke that's actually funny, and one that I can pretend might actually solve problems I care about. McAfee is my candidate.

    3. Re:Not a question, but a suggestion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AKA the "we don't know what he stands for exactly but we like the way he stands" crowd.

    4. Re:Not a question, but a suggestion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /pol/ called...

      can't stump the Trump

    5. Re:Not a question, but a suggestion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they managed to get Obama elected...

  15. Margin of victory by Kohath · · Score: 1

    What do you think will be your margin of victory? Do you think it'll be a landslide?

    1. Re:Margin of victory by bobbied · · Score: 1

      What do you think will be your margin of victory?

      About (-100)%. I'll get exactly two votes, mine and some dead guy from Detroit.

      Do you think it'll be a landslide?

      On top of me? Yes...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Margin of victory by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

      >> some dead guy from Detroit

      Not true. The dead are a reliable Democrat bloc.

  16. Mr. McAfee,

    As President of the United States, would you make any significant changes to what drugs you take and how often you take them? If so, could you give us a general sense of what those changes might be?

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Fine. by lambsonic · · Score: 1

      Mr. McAfee,

      As President of the United States, would you make any significant changes to what drugs you take and how often you take them? If so, could you give us a general sense of what those changes might be?

      He will be using the JFK cocktail.

      --
      # make clean sig
  17. What will be your foreign policy intentions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess I don't really need to elaborate. It's a huge subject to go into any nuance, but surely you can generalize for me.

  18. Copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Do you feel that copyright protections on art and entertainment are too weak or too strong, and do you intend to do anything about it?

  19. Why not run under the Democrats/Republican party? by gQuigs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Third party runs in the US aren't really given a remotely fair shot.

    Specifically the republican party primary seems like you would have the best shot there... I would be shocked if you can't make it to the top 10...

  20. How do I uninstall McAfee antivirus? by sims+2 · · Score: 1

    How do I uninstall McAfee antivirus?
    It really bogs down the 10 year old electronic voting machines and the trial expired years ago.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    1. Re:How do I uninstall McAfee antivirus? by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 2

      Pretty sure he already answered that one:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    2. Re:How do I uninstall McAfee antivirus? by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      That is really him in the video isn't it? OMG.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  21. Cybersecurity Knowledge? by jmac_the_man · · Score: 3

    Mr. McAfee, obviously your field of expertise is Information Security. What are the one or two biggest problems facing the Federal government from an IT perspective? How would you solve these problems?

  22. Trump by justcauseisjustthat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What are your thoughts on Donald Trump (another businessman)? And why are you more qualified to be president?

    1. Re:Trump by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      Sorry to grammar police you but your punctuation was way off. Reformatted:

      What are your thoughts on Donald Trump, another businessman (???), and why are you more qualified to be president?

  23. Your stance on offshoring/outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    See subject: Your thoughts on what needs to be done on the account of outsourcing/offshoring jobs in the United States, most specifically on the software industry related front?

    * I think you'd be a great candidate on privacy issues, and from what I've read from you on that note plus your industry experience, there I have little doubts in your knowledge & experience... the above question is what I am interested in, as it affects the USA as a whole.

    (I'm semi-retired from the field myself, only doing contracts here & there/now & then, instead focusing on a real estate related business I run now, but software & tech allowed me to get to this point now for the most part. It changed my life for the better. I hate to see other younger folks being deprived of the same opportunities I had...)

    I don't understand our government and the corporate America that REALLY runs the show behind it (lobbying & what-not) - don't they understand that when you pull jobs you remove taxable income AND a spending/buying public? I think they do - but instead, live for short-term gains only nowadays.

    APK

    P.S.=> Thanks for your time Mr. McAfee... apk

    1. Re:Your stance on offshoring/outsourcing by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Did you offshore your hosts file creation yet?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    2. Re:Your stance on offshoring/outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear known troll of /.: Would you please for once get on topic?

  24. How will you handle the Republican's love of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ignorance? They love being stupid so they hate technology. They hate it. They hate anyone that understands it. They want us to die. How will you keep us from dying? They want us to die.

  25. funding by DoctorBonzo · · Score: 1

    What are the sources of funds for your campaign?

  26. Snowden by gQuigs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Would you pardon Edward Snowden?

    1. Re:Snowden by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Would you pardon Edward Snowden?

      I came to ask this. Alas, no mod points.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    2. Re:Snowden by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      As an inverse to this, would you order the CIA to execute the traitorous bastard?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:Snowden by nvm_my_comment · · Score: 1

      meh that's already the stand of the current gouvernement...

  27. purpose of government by DoctorBonzo · · Score: 2

    What is the purpose of government?

  28. What is your best time? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Can you run in under 2 hours 30 minutes?

    Or are you slower?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  29. life by DoctorBonzo · · Score: 1

    What is a good life?

  30. Where's the rest of the platform? by mr_mischief · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We understand where you stand on surveillance. Where do you stand on these issues?:

    firearms
    abortion
    gay marriage
    investing in prisons and drug stings vs. investing in job training and job creation
    legalizing marijuana
    keeping the FCC from preventing flashing of consumer electronics with new firmware
    net neutrality
    the Keystone XL pipeline
    amnesty for illegal immigrants
    streamlining guest worker visas for legal immigrants
    HB-1 visa quotas
    lowering the skyrocketing levels of student debt
    making healthcare affordable or subsidizing paying for it
    investing in our roads and bridges
    making Internet a common utility like water and electricity

    1. Re:Where's the rest of the platform? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      We understand where you stand on surveillance. Where do you stand on these issues?

      Add to that:
      Stance on Israel
      Nuclear power
      Renewable power
      Carbon-based power
      Fusion research
      Edward Snowden
      Manned space exploration
      Robotic space exploration
      Recent Russian expansionism
      Syrian and African refugees

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    2. Re:Where's the rest of the platform? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://mcafee16.com/issues/

    3. Re:Where's the rest of the platform? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Thanks. That's quite helpful. There are still some things I'd like answered out of my original list.

    4. Re:Where's the rest of the platform? by Aryeh+Goretsky · · Score: 1

      Hello,

      To add to the list:

      campaign finance reform (wrt. Citizens United v. FEC)
      copyright infringement (should it be a civil or a criminal matter)
      education (vouchers for private schools)
      intellectual property (in particular, patents on software)
      prostitution (legalization of)

      Regards,

      Aryeh Goretsky

      --
      Dexter is a good dog.
  31. Why don't you proofread your website? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    I know this is almost certainly not McAfee's job personally, but the "cyberparty" website has a glaring typographical error on it. Did they hire former slashdot employees to work on it and not realize it?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  32. Priorities by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

    Would you rather fight one horse-sized Hillary Clinton or 100 duck-sized Donald Trumps?

    Also, "Cyber Party?" Is that like a group sex chat room? I do not want to have a cyber party with you.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    1. Re:Priorities by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1
      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
  33. One World by shuz · · Score: 4

    Hello Mr. McAfee,
    The world largely views the USA as a bully and full of very wealthy people that don't care about those less privileged. As president of the USA, how would you advance world cooperation and work to change world views of the USA to just another location in the world full of mostly average non-privileged individuals living out their lives?

    Unrelated, my best friend almost ran you over at Defcon. He wasn't looking where he is going and apologizes.

    --
    There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
    1. Re:One World by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      Follow-up: how DID you make it to DEFCON this year after getting picked up for DIU and weapons charges?
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

      >> how would you advance world cooperation and work to change world views of the USA to just another location in the world full of mostly average non-privileged individuals living out their lives?
      And for the last poster: why should this be a priority? Is this a question about reducing the size of the terrorist bulls-eye on us or what?

    2. Re:One World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was before DC. He was released the day and went to B-sides.

    3. Re:One World by Kohath · · Score: 1

      The world largely views the USA as a bully and full of very wealthy people that don't care about those less privileged.

      We were promised that the world would love us if we elected Obama. Did the world break it's promise?

    4. Re: One World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the world's loves 51% of us.

    5. Re:One World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that wasn't the world making that promise, it was your media. The world cares about actions not rhetoric or whether you guys can overcome your massive racism problems.

  34. Asked and answered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For all the people asking how to install McAfee antivirus, please see John's announcement on youtube:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKgf5PaBzyg

  35. Why do you live in west Tennessee? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Why do you live in west Tennessee?

    1. Re:Why do you live in west Tennessee? by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      Easy river access - this guy knows how to travel.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  36. Wow by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    I don't know what's more exciting - this, or the Ellen Pao court case!

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be glad when she fades into obscurity. She'll continue to blame everybody but herself for all her woes even though she's her own worst enemy.

      She's downright toxic after the reddit fiasco too and she's making things harder for women everywhere in "the industry"

  37. What is your stance on prostitution in the USA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Would you clamp down on commercial sex, or move towards legitimizing it?

  38. Comment on your last interview by schneidafunk · · Score: 2

    Care to comment on your last answer from your last interview here on slashdot?

    McAfee: The attorney for the House Ways and Means Committee contacted me and asked if I would help. I said “no”. I would never run for office, neither would I want to be in office, of any kind. I would rather drive a nail through my foot.

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Comment on your last interview by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      He has been working on driving the nail through his foot and decided that running for president actually was the better option.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  39. Reality by wstrucke · · Score: 3

    How do you plan to overcome the virtual impossibility of breaking through the two-party system?

  40. Anti-virus by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    Is there anything you can do about self-reproducing laws? Like how people repeatedly make it illegal to murder, to show they are "tough on crime"?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  41. How can we take you seriously? by Smelly+Von+Smellerto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Trying not to be facetious here, but why should we believe you're genuinely interested in leading this country and not just trying to get some media coverage? What in your recent history would lead a voter to believe you'll take this process seriously enough to make and difference at all?

  42. Clueless by SpankiMonki · · Score: 2

    If technology is the main plank of this guy's platform, then he doesn't have a clue about what's wrong with our government.

    1. Re:Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you did even the slightest bit of research, you wouldn't have looked so foolish posting this.

  43. How change works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does someone from within the system (culture, law, government, etc.) change the system to something different?
    How does someone outside the system, who does not have credibility from within the system convince the system they need to be changed?

    How do either of these forces create change without the need to throw away the existing system (E.G. Bankruptcy, use of force, leaving)?

  44. What Technologies? by Bodhammer · · Score: 2

    What technology research should be government funded and what should be private?

    --
    "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
  45. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way back in the day (late 1990s to early 2000s) McAfee had a solid AV product, until one day a new version turned it into a steaming pile of garbage that unilaterally and without even asking completely trashed my Windows installation by literally deleting half the files on the HDD. That is something that scarred me permanently and led me to dismiss that product out of hand at the mid-size manufacturing company I worked for at the time.

    My question is: if you can't be trusted to produce a trustworthy and competent piece of computer software, how can you expect anybody trust you with the vast arsenal of the United States armed forces?

  46. Broken Summary? by morgauxo · · Score: 1

    I thought he left McAffe (the company) before the whole Belize incident. Or did he run another big corporation at that time?

  47. BS alert by AdamThor · · Score: 1

    "By adapting a lean approach to government, the amount of savings that can be realized by improved efficiency will eliminate the need for wholesale changes to foundational policies."

    The line which amounts to "We will save so much under my administration that I will give you all this pork for NO COST!" has been used before, and it was bullshit back then.

    If you are cynical, you should avoid this line because other cynics (cynical about government? this is a large population) will see your BS clearly. If you actually think you can pull this off then you should recognize that this is not low hanging fruit, it's not easy to do, you should structure your planning to not depend on your ability to do this.

    If this is some sort of meta-joke at the expense of politics and campaigns then carry on.

    --
    -- "Oh. This guy again."
  48. Why Cyber party, why not Pirate party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may not be aware, but the American Pirate party supports most, if not all of your issues.
    Do you know the international Pirate party movement? Would you consider coordinating your effort with them?

  49. Federal Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is your stance on the Federal Reserve? We've only had 2 central banks in the history of this country, both of which are privately owned and ran for a profit by a group of private bankers. Do you agree with the federal reserve enslaving Americans into never-ending debt through interest rates and secret bailouts to foreign banks through tax payer dollars, or do you think we should abandon the Federal Reserve and go back to what the constitution originally states, which is the US treasury can create currency without interest, and does not need to answer to a private corporation for their monetary policy.

  50. How can we trust you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your name is attached to one of the shittiest (if not the shittiest) antivirus products in the history of time. When will you apologize for this grievous injustice to the world?

  51. you sir, are no Dwayne Comacho by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    He's no Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho. But he's close.
    Maybe a Trump / McAfee 2016 ticket would cover all bases.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  52. Dear John by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On a scale of 0 to Snoop Lion, just how fucking high are you?

    Do you think that your level of batshit is equal to or greater than your level prior to bath salts?

  53. single issue much? by nazsco · · Score: 1

    everyone knows that the american people vote on single issues, but your campaign site takes the prize.

    besides cyber security and police state and using technology on goverment processes, what is your second most important issue? if there is any.

  54. target campaign goal? by nazsco · · Score: 1

    Do you have a target goal for the amount of money you need to launder via your campaign? or are going to keep on even after that amount is met?

  55. Would you prefer that we by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (1) Tar, feather, and run your stupid ass out of the race on a rail
    (2) Feather, tar, and run your stupid ass out of the race on a rail
    (3) Run your stupid ass out of the race on a rail, then tar and feather you
    (4) ... you get the idea

  56. Federal security forces by meeotch · · Score: 1

    Would you disband the NSA and TSA, and replace them with a Federal Bureau of Tree-Cops?

  57. Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we get a download link for the removal tool ahead of time, just in case?

  58. NASA/Space Exploration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you thoughts about Space Exploration? Would you attempt, as President, to fast track money to the likes of NASA? Would you rely on the government for space exploration? Private entities? Both?

    Lastly, I need a job. You have anything brewing in California I can join?

  59. Rules of engagement for cyber espionage by mothrafokker · · Score: 1

    I understand that your platform suggests a massive investment in techno-literacy for Americans, which will take years beyond a presidential term to achieve. In the meantime, given the state of the modern internet with regards to cyber crimes and foreign government-sponsored hacking, what are your plans to protect U.S. technology interests and investments, and when those measures fails, what forms of sanctions can we expect the McAfee administration to seek redress the damages?

    --
    I just can't talk to you when you're right here.
  60. My question is simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who do you think you're kidding?

  61. Well Rounded Governement by mlheur · · Score: 1

    The key issue I've read about relating to your campaign is that the government is "illiterate when it comes to technology". Governing, like managing and leading, requires being an expert in working with advisers, it's up to those advisers to be experts in their fields. Technology aside, what makes you more qualified than other candidates in the fields of National Defense; Foreign Affairs; Environmental Protection; Infrastructure Management; Resource Management; Financial Management; Employment Stability; and Resource Sustainability, etc?

  62. runaway freight train by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mr McAfee, your campaign seems to have the momentum of a runaway freight train. Why are you so popular?

  63. Government Transparency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How would you implement more transparency in government operations and information? Initiatives like opendata.gov are a start, but a frequent slashdot favorite is a full edit log of legislation, so not only which senator/rep, but which of their interns, authored/edited what parts of legislation. Would you try to enforce full readings of legislation before votes, or other methods to force clarity? Would you make the NSA release CVE's of encountered exploits? Do you have an opinion on the allowable extent of government transparency?

  64. Coren22 = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You couldn't prove my points wrong on hosts http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * :)

    (You're obviously STILL 'stinging' after that "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" of yours in that link above still, lmao...)

    APK

    P.S.=> Especially seeing you trolling me now, which only gives that much clearly away, & only to see you be publicly embarassed by YOUR FAIL in that link above, yet again - lol... apk

    1. Re:Coren22 = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!"... apk by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, you stopped replying, but I guess you didn't find that thread.

      Can your hosts files block the host file advertisements I keep finding disguised as Slashdot posts?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    2. Re:Coren22 = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coren22 lies aren't helping you. Apk's last replier there http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and you ran from his challenge since you were unable to prove every single one of his points wrong. You didn't even prove 1 wrong.

    3. Re:Coren22 = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coren22 your post history shows you troll n' run here http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    4. Re:Coren22 = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!"... apk by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Lol, lame sockpuppet again, grow up APK, no one thinks people actually talk exactly like you and worship the ground you walk on.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    5. Re:Coren22 = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!"... apk by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Another lame sockpuppet, nobody thinks this isn't you APK.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  65. Answer the question here (again)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prove me wrong (can't be done): Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop C&C communique
    3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop C&C communique
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop C&C communique
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get you past a dnsbl
    12.) Keep you off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
    14.) Work on anything webbound (ie email programs) multiplatform.
    15.) Give you easily controlled data
    16.) Do all that & block ads better than addons more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory usage

    * ANSWER ="NO" to each above on ab+ doing it as well or @ ALL + hosts = already on every device natively.

    APK

    P.S.=> Ab+ does less than hosts & less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):

    Ab+'s 128mb memory inefficiency http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts consume 3-11mb using my program initially).

    +

    ClarityRay defeats it by dumping addons in use in a browser via native browser methods!

    +

    Ab+'s paid to not do its job http://www.businessinsider.com...

    Ab+ adds complexity from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).

    ---

    What's best?

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    In its 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    ... apk

    1. Re:Answer the question here (again)... apk by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Can hosts file:

      1. Stop APK Spam?
      2. Make you not sound like an insane drooling moron?
      3. Make your typing style not extremely painful to read?
      4. Work without admin privileges?
      5. Handle Dynamic host or geographic distribution of hosts?

      Run FORREST Run!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    2. Re:Answer the question here (again)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear known /. troll Coren22: Can you ever be on topic and stop trolling?

  66. Thanks for failing (especially here)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knew you couldn't do it - nobody ever has, or will + your ad hominem attacks (completely illogical & offtopic) aren't cutting it either!

    * :)

    (You can't help it - I got the best of you & this stupidity is the "best you got"? Please... lol!)

    APK

    P.S.=> "Onwards & UPWARDS"... apk

    1. Re:Thanks for failing (especially here)... apk by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Still can't answer a single question asked of you? Run FORREST Run!

      I don't need to answer your questions, I use other programs to do what your "program" does, and none of them have the serious security problems your program has.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  67. What "security problem"'s that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject, & yes, you RAN as usual here http://interviews.slashdot.org...

    * :)

    FACT: Hosts do FAR more with FAR LESS resource consumption than ANY *single* browser addon there is, & they aren't detectable & blockable by native browser methods easily either... You futher prove that fact via your evasions vs. that fair challenge of mine to you in that link above... lol - thanks for making ME look GOOD, & yourself, by way of comparison? Well, "not so good", lmao...

    (You're a waste of my time, other than providing myself & others amusement @ your troll "ne'er-do-well" antics).

    APK

    P.S.=> I love it - ought to make Mr. McAfee LAUGH @ U hugely should he read my post & answer my question... apk

    1. Re:What "security problem"'s that? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Browser addons such as adblock plus does not require privilege escalation in order to install, your software requires privileges in order to even update.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  68. Adblock's easily detected & blocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: by native browser methods & can't do the 1 job it had fully by default, in blocking ALL ads!

    * What you describe IS a security PROTECTION in Windows, protecting hosts via alteration by malware (which MY program also does, protecting the hosts file vs. that also while it is resident)!

    ---

    Plus - My program's NOT malware by ANY means & here's the proof of that:

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    (They also have a copy of my sourcecode they verified as 100% safe - why else would they BOTH hosts + recommend my ware above all others of its kind then?)

    &

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    In its 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    (..., & the ONLY WAY to update hosts & have it take is to have admin priveleges (which YOU assign to my application's shortcut as the program's directions instruct you to do): That's NO SECURITY ISSUE: It's normal!

    APK

    P.S.=> You obviously need to brush up on your computer tech know-how, lol... apk

  69. Coren22 caught in another lie again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Someone looked & saw I had last word there. They corrected you! You needed it after your lies you spouted before it, lmao...

    * You fail again!

    APK

    P.S.=> You can't HELP but fail, can you? Nope... apk

  70. Coren22 caught in yet another lie... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Coren22, you DO "run, forrest: run!!!", a lot - that post proves it again (like this exchange did here -> when you RAN from that completely FAIR challenge I put to you, for the 100th time now probably (lol), & @ least you're consistent - you ALWAYS "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!").

    * Lastly - projecting your OWN "modus operandi" troll? After all - you ARE completely offtopic here, as per your trolling usual, after all... lmao!

    APK

    P.S.=> Aren't your legs TIRED from all that running? What might help is you CHANGING YOUR DIET!

    "Eating your words != GOOD NUTRITION!!!"

    ... apk

  71. Likelihood by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    What do you feel the likelihood of getting elected is as a numerical percent?

  72. Can't have a criminal in office! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wait... been there, done that

  73. Can't have a criminal in office! by iq145 · · Score: 1

    Oh wait... been there, done that

  74. Coren22 the hypocrite noob "eats his words" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    quote> "So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)

    Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?

    ANSWER:

    I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!

    (The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).

    ---

    Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?

    "Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)

    See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!

    (& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)

    ... apk

  75. Coren22 the hypocrite noob "eats his words" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    quote> "So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)

    Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?

    ANSWER:

    I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!

    (The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).

    ---

    Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?

    "Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)

    See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!

    (& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)

    ... apk

  76. Coren22 the hypocrite noob "eats his words" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    quote> "So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)

    Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?

    ANSWER:

    I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!

    (The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).

    ---

    Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?

    "Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)

    See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!

    (& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)

    ... apk

  77. Coren22 the hypocrite noob "eats his words" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)

    Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?

    ANSWER:

    I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!

    (The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).

    ---

    Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?

    "Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)

    See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!

    (& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)

    ... apk

  78. Coren22 the hypocrite noob "eats his words" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)

    Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?

    ANSWER:

    I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!

    (The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).

    ---

    Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?

    "Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)

    See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!

    (& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)

    ... apk

  79. Coren22 the hypocrite noob "eats his words" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)

    Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?

    ANSWER:

    I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!

    (The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).

    ---

    Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?

    "Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)

    See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!

    (& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).

    APK

    P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)

    ... apk