Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What To Do About Android Malware?

An anonymous reader writes: What's your approach to detecting and dealing with Android malware? I have a fairly new, fairly fancy phone running Android Lollipop, the recently degraded performance of which leads me to believe that it's infected with malware. That, and a friend who noticed a lot of strange activity coming from my phone's IP — sorry, I don't have the logs, but he pointed out that there were pings coming from my phone to a lot of sketchy addresses — which pretty much seals the deal. There have been lots of stories lately about Android malware that remind me of the old saw about weather: everyone talks about it, but no one does anything about it. However, that can't be completely true, and before I reach a phone crisis, I'd like to get some sane, sage advice about diagnosing malware, and disposing of it, or at least mitigating its damage. When it comes to diagnosing, I don't know what software to trust. I've heard positive things from friends (and seen both positive reviews and terrible negative ones, raising even more meta questions about trust) about Malwarebytes, so I installed their mobile version. This dutifully scans my system, and reports no errors and malware. Which doesn't mean there isn't any, though I'd be happy to find out that I'm just being paranoid. The OS is stock (Motorola Nexus 6) and kept up to date. I have only very conventional apps, all downloaded from Google's Play store, and believe it or not I don't visit any dodgy websites on my phone, at least not intentionally. So: what's the most reliable way to get an accurate view of whether I am dealing with malware at all, and hopefully to eradicate it? Good malware hides well, I know, but is there any tool on the side of the righteous that is currently best at rooting it out? If I find a specific form of malware on my phone, how can I remove it?

191 comments

  1. Google had a chance . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to start with a completely clean slate and get it right. Instead they re-created the Windows ecosystem. Congratulations.

    1. Re:Google had a chance . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess they could have put it in Apple`s Walled Prison right

    2. Re:Google had a chance . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But it's free and open and full of goodness and stuff!

      Curse Apple and their walled garden! I WANT TO BE ABLE TO CHOOSE MY MALWARE FREELY!

    3. Re:Google had a chance . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to Windows 10.

      Would you kindly enjoy the eXperience.

    4. Re:Google had a chance . . . by slazzy · · Score: 2

      You don't choose Malware, good malware chooses you.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    5. Re:Google had a chance . . . by SumDog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's worse that Windows. In Windows you can reinstall the base OS (bloatware free) and then install the drivers and you're done.

      Android is to the point where they should have a standard-driver-package. Manufactures can release something similar to an apk, with the source (or just .o files, who gives a shit) that can auto-compile for all devices. That what you just go ASOP + these special packages and boom. Standard Android. You can use your manufactures custom install as well, but at least you'd have a choice. Google could add in the EULA that voiding warranties for unlocking bootloaders is out of the rules.

      It's not that difficult a fix. You could get manufactures not releasing driver package updates, sure...but at least it would make it easier to do so. Android would benefit from being more like Windows as a general purpose OS at this point.

    6. Re:Google had a chance . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what happens when a device mfg has special firmware to change the (bloatware free) base OS?

    7. Re:Google had a chance . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sure you "can" keep them longer. But lets face it, if you update to the latest iOS, the phone becomes crippled unless you have the latest iphone.
      So you essentially are "forced" to upgrade every year. Not what I'd call "long span of vendor support".

    8. Re:Google had a chance . . . by rworne · · Score: 1

      Funny you mention this, My 2014 iPhone 6+ runs this year's iOS 9 better than it ever did iOS 8. Same goes with the iPad Air too. We have a 5s and a 5c here and their owners haven't complained any either.

      I'd guess you may be right talking about the 4s, but that's 4 years old now and it too runs iOS 9.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    9. Re: Google had a chance . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unhelpful AND bitchy. Now, if you've just been insulting, you could have had the troll trifecta.

    10. Re:Google had a chance . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's all fine. You couldn't pay me to use iOS.

    11. Re: Google had a chance . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's clear by your first comment. You don't know what you are talking about.

    12. Re:Google had a chance . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android is to the point where they should have a standard-driver-package. Manufactures can release something similar to an apk, with the source (or just .o files, who gives a shit) that can auto-compile for all devices.

      Phones are complex, and use IP from various vendors. Chances are they'd violate redistribution clauses if they tried something like this.

      How do you handle cryptographic signing of the firmware to ensure there's no malicious modifications to the ROM? Not that many people will compile from source, they'd just download a ROM from the Internet that may have malware built in. Manufacturers don't want to make this easy.

    13. Re:Google had a chance . . . by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The Google Play store has a record of every app you have installed. You synch your personal data to the cloud or an SD card, you factory reset the phone, and you log onto your Google account and go into the 'my apps' tab of the Play Store and bring back the apps you really use. Its an easy house-cleaning.

    14. Re:Google had a chance . . . by rworne · · Score: 1

      I only pointed out a counter example to an earlier post. I'm not on a mission to convert Android users or get into a pissing match - the choice of OS in this case is just a matter of personal taste.

      It's like arguing over speakers. Specs are good and all that, but the best choice ultimately is what sounds good to the buyer.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    15. Re:Google had a chance . . . by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough this has been a crapshoot for me every time resulting in missing apps.

    16. Re: Google had a chance . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can think of two cases where it won't auto install apps you had:

      1) the app is no longer in the store
      2) you didn't have the current version installed. If it were to just install the current version from the store, it would be giving you an upgrade that you had intentionally been avoiding.

      They're may be other cases too, that's just off the top of my head.

    17. Re: Google had a chance . . . by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      This kind of approach doesn't tend to restore the fact that you were finally on level 42 of Junkfood Smash, either.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    18. Re: Google had a chance . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitch at software developers to include Google Play Games save sync support. Larger developers might not care what you say, but smaller ones will give you better luck. I was successful in convincing developers to add support twice, back in ~2013 when the save sync APIs first came out.

    19. Re:Google had a chance . . . by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      FWIW, my iPhone 5S seems to do just fine on iOS 9, and that's one generation behind yours.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  2. Start over by Fwipp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wipe it. Flash a new ROM; don't install any other app stores, don't download sketchy apps.

    If you have malware, that's cause you (or someone with access to your phone) installed it. Don't do that.

    1. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wipe it. Flash a new ROM; don't install any other app stores, don't download sketchy apps.

      If you have malware, that's cause you (or someone with access to your phone) installed it. Don't do that.

      What about the ones that install from bad advertisements or exploit the browser/apps that come pre-loaded with your phone?

    2. Re:Start over by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wipe it. Flash a new ROM; don't install any other app stores, don't download sketchy apps.

      If you have malware, that's cause you (or someone with access to your phone) installed it. Don't do that.

      In other words voluntarily lock yourself into a walled garden? But isn't one of the biggest advantages of Android the freedom to install anything you want from any place you want?

    3. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With great power comes great responsibility.

    4. Re:Start over by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unlike iOS Android allows you to side load apps *officially* but in this case all bets are off and you MUST understand what you're doing. With Apple there's no such freedom (unless you root your phone which is unsafe and voids your warranty) at all.

      So, Google's walled garden is at your full discretion. If you like the feeling of safety you stay in it. If you want freedom, you can leave it any time you want. Most Android phones even allow you to have root if you're hellbent on having total freedom [to destroy your device].

    5. Re:Start over by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Amazon and F-Droid app stores are fine. Just avoid the less reputable ones until you learn the basics of computer use, like not installing dodgy cracked apps or "free" virus scans etc.

      Look, the questioner clearly knows enough to be dangerous to himself but not enough to wield root privileges on his phone. Best thing to do is stick to Play until he understands this stuff. Just because you have the freedom to do something doesn't mean you should assume you can do it competently.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Start over by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      So? It's the same with a PC. Yet malware is actually quite easy to avoid.

      Walled garden and trust are not the same thing.

    7. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes please. The GP was trying to explain that if you don't know what you are doing , you will end up as worse than in the walled garden.
      The apple of knowledge is what forced the first couple in the rel world.

    8. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you have malware, that's cause you (or someone with access to your phone) installed it.

      Not necessarily true. There are quite a few passive vectors for injecting malware into older android apps. The numerous stagefright vulnerabilities included.

    9. Re:Start over by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      In other words voluntarily lock yourself into a walled garden? But isn't one of the biggest advantages of Android the freedom to install anything you want from any place you want?

      I'm not sure why the significance of voluntarily escapes you.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re: Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In iOS 9 you can side load apps without a developer license.

    11. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike iOS Android allows you to side load apps *officially* but in this case all bets are off and you MUST understand what you're doing. With Apple there's no such freedom (unless you root your phone which is unsafe and voids your warranty) at all.

      So, Google's walled garden is at your full discretion. If you like the feeling of safety you stay in it. If you want freedom, you can leave it any time you want. Most Android phones even allow you to have root if you're hellbent on having total freedom [to destroy your device].

      You can sideload / install any apps on iOS that you compile from Xcode yourself. No payment to Apple required. This is allowed by Apple and doesn't void any warranties.

    12. Re: Start over by Karlt1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The difference with a PC is that when a security vulnerability is found on a Dell running Windoes and Microsoft releases a patch, you don't have to wait for Dell and Best Buy to hopefully allow you to update your PC.

      When Google releases a patch for Android, you have to hope that you phone manufacturer and your carrier push the patch to you.

    13. Re:Start over by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      In other words voluntarily lock yourself into a walled garden? But isn't one of the biggest advantages of Android the freedom to install anything you want from any place you want?

      I'm free to invite anyone into my house I want. Yet, I still lock the doors at night. A voluntary walled garden, every night. Arguably literally. Choosing to be safe is like locking your car doors at the mall. If you lock your car doors when you go shopping, you are a hypocrite. You have the freedom to invite absolutely anyone into your car, so locking it DESTROYs your freedom. Why do you hate freedom?

    14. Re:Start over by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you have malware, that's cause you (or someone with access to your phone) installed it. Don't do that.

      So there exists no browser exploit, no vulnerable apps on the app store, and no other way for your phone to have a problem unless you sideload a "bad" APK? Seems like there are some vulnerabilities you are missing on your list.

    15. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best thing to do is stick to Play until he understands this stuff.

      LOL. http://fortune.com/2015/07/08/...

    16. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you lock your car doors when you go shopping, you are a hypocrite. You have the freedom to invite absolutely anyone into your car, so locking it DESTROYs your freedom. Why do you hate freedom?

      Pottering, is that you?

    17. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can sideload / install any apps on iOS that you compile from Xcode yourself. No payment to Apple required.

      Xcode only runs on OS X. How is that "no payment to Apple"?

    18. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can sideload / install any apps on iOS that you compile from Xcode yourself. No payment to Apple required.

      Xcode only runs on OS X. How is that "no payment to Apple"?

      Hackintosh?

    19. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because that allows him to maintain his moral high ground.

    20. Re:Start over by moschner · · Score: 1

      Malware is also served up through compromised ad services. So going to legit sites can still lead to a phone getting malware. Mobile ad networks are usually worse than the regular web.

      I suggest after wiping the phone, to install a good adblocker and to use a browser that blocks ads by default. I personally like using the Ghostery browser.

      If you are also worried, make sure that you have it set NOT to allow installation of apps from unknown sources.

    21. Re:Start over by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Literally.

      You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means

    22. Re:Start over by nickweller · · Score: 1

      timothy has nothing better to do but inject Android FUD into the blogosphere ..

    23. Re:Start over by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Those are covered by "someone with access to your phone", it seems like.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    24. Re: Start over by GrahamJ · · Score: 1

      Or from a reseller. See recent news.

    25. Re:Start over by tepples · · Score: 1

      You paid Apple a premium for the iDevice; you can pay Apple a premium for the Mac. Or you could buy a Mac the next time it's time to replace your computer with a new one anyway.

    26. Re: Start over by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      You only have to wait until you warranty expires on an Android phone and then of course it makes no difference. You will of course need to reference how well that phone works with non-manufacturer specific android builds. Once you no longer have a warranty to lose, well, you have more to lose by sticking to older unpatched Android builds. Google could of course work to create Android releases and an install system for the most popular Android phones to keep them up to date, once they are out of warranty.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    27. Re: Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it's a Samsung device, some of which have been found to disable Windows Updates.

    28. Re:Start over by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Since iOS 8 something-or-other, you've been able to download and install apps from anywhere. No mac, no Xcode, just the iPad and a website.

      This is a complete nightmare now, because my kids fill their iPads up will all sorts of dodgy apps. The whole point of buying iPads was to avoid this - we did have an Android device for a while but it was rapidly filled with adware.

    29. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are covered by "someone with access to your phone", it seems like.

      No phone is exclusively yours, there are recent articles on Slashdot that talk about malware being installed at the factory (some Chinese brand).

    30. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please understand that what you call malware some company calls business idea. Most of the apps in any app-store has the goal of downloading as much data about you as possible, constantly. Does that fit with your idea of how your smartphone should behave? No problem, go ahead and use those apps. If not, then don't use those apps.Google won't change that behavior because it's their business idea too (and to provide that same functionality to others).

    31. Re: Start over by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You're comparing different things. I was comparing Android's permissions to PC's permissions. On a PC I don't have a walled garden and yet it's simple enough to keep my computer malware free.

      You're comparing bugs in the OS, and while I agree with you that Android leaves a lot to be desired in the patching process nearly all malware on Android does NOT rely on bugs in the OS. Most Android malware first requires the installation of a compromised package. Which goes back to my original point: If you trust the package then you shouldn't have a problem.

    32. Re:Start over by Blymie · · Score: 1

      2 :in effect :virtually

      http://i.word.com/idictionary/...

      http://theweek.com/articles/46...

      Words can means more than one thing. Literally is now ALSO = figuratively.

      It's over. Multiple dictictionaries say so. Suck it up and deal with it, his usage was 100%, literally correct.

      English is dynamic, a living language.

    33. Re: Start over by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      There have been numerous security flaws in the crapware bundled with Dell and other manufacturer's PCs. You have to rely on the manufacturer for updates to it, or disable it. Same goes for Android.

      Google does do OS updates for non-Nexus devices. They come via the Play store. It's absolutely untrue that Google can't patch the OS. They can patch it, and what's more the Play store services can detect and remove malware, or put mitigations in for the few security issues they can't patch.

      That's why you don't see vast Android botnets. There are billions of Android devices out there, if security was even half as bad as some people make out we would be seeing armies of 0wned devices attacking us.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    34. Re: Start over by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      There is no in-the-wild exploit to install apps on an Android device without consent. Much less on a Nexus 6, which regularly receives updates that plug any known security holes. The dude probably installed some (cr)app or game from the app store that pings ad servers even when not on foreground, or -since this is slashdot- used his "information wants to be fuh-ree" right and sideloaded pirare apk's.

    35. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the ones that install from bad advertisements or exploit the browser/apps that come pre-loaded with your phone?

      Is an exploit that makes this possible known? If not, how is this different from a phone from any other vendor?
      A walled garden does not protect against an exploit like that.

    36. Re:Start over by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      My dictionary says (emphasis added),

      Since some people take sense 2 ["virtually"] to be the opposite of sense 1 ["actually"], it has been frequently criticized as a misuse. Instead, the use is pure hyperbole intended to gain emphasis, but it often appears in contexts where no additional emphasis is necessary.

      Translation: You use it like that if you're wanting to be a drama queen waiting to make a point just so you can appear intelligent.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    37. Re:Start over by Blymie · · Score: 1

      That does not make this thread's OP incorrect in using it. It does mean, though, that you've essentially dropped to character assassination, simply because you don't like him using it in the recently dictionary validated way.

      Now that the usage is officially correct, after being added to many dictionaries over the last few years, people need to just get over it. That means, that when someone uses it, changing:

      "I *hate* that, it is incorrect usage"

      to

      "I *hate* that, it *should* be incorrect usage, so I'll make up some arbitrary insult about that usage, due to my emotional dislike of it in that context."

      is quite .... unfair? Stubborn? Self-satisfying? Not sure which, but something akin to those.

      Realistically, you (and others in this thread) that dislike this word, in this usage, are suffering from "old man" syndrome.

      The world is changing! Everything has gone to weed! Bah!

      Embrace change, in a dynamic language.

      NOTE: I say this as someone that *hates* incorrect usage. Its versus it's is my big "bah". I keep posting crap like this:

      "How to keep its and it's straight! It is the same as hers and his. Why?

      Well, my premise is that it used to be "hes", but morphed to 'his' over the years. So:

      he => hes => his
      her => hers
      it => its"

      So.. I DO SYMPATHIZE. However, if its and it's were somehow merged in the dictionary, I think I'd have to give it up.

      The war is over. The battle is lost. There is no going back, no reversion, for literally all eternity, literally has changed. ;)

      The best you can hope for at this point, is that in a few hundred years dictionaries change that second definition to 'archaic'.. like I've seen for some other words.

    38. Re: Start over by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      I can uninstall any crapware that is on a Wndows PC - or I can avoid crapware entirely by buying PCs from Dell's or HPs business units.

      I can also install the newest version of Windows without waiting for the manufacturer. I was even able to stick a Windows 7 disk in an old unsupported Mac Mini from 2006 and install it.

      Yes Google is able to update Google Play Services but there are parts of the low level OS they can't update.

    39. Re: Start over by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      Apple's review process does little to prevent security vulnerabilities. They have a static code analyzer that keeps apps from using non public APIs but that's about it. Security on iOS is a function of the operating system sand boxing apps and a better permission system. I don't have to trust the package.

      If a security vulnerability is found in the OS. It can be patched and at least right now, pushed to every iOS device worldwide introduced since 2011.

    40. Re: Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why is there hardly no malware on iOS? android is riddled with malware, while iOS gets a small fraction of the malware android phones receive.

    41. Re: Start over by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Again you're missing my point. It's not OS level security, but dumb user level security.

      Most of the malware that has actual effect on users is the result of such users installing explicit programs that have questionable requirements i.e. a crappy angry birds rip-off that for some reason needs permission to send SMSes, read your contact list, etc etc. Shit like that is absolutely rife outside the legitimate app stores. And protecting yourself from it is akin to not installing free programs from www.freesoftware.info or some similar crap.

      OS level security holes on mobiles are quite few, and rarely exploited, and there is not a single self-replicating piece of malware on Android or iOS currently that doesn't request a user's explicit permission to install it.

    42. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I've rooted two Android tablets and a phone, and never "destroyed" my device. FUD much?

    43. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words voluntarily lock yourself into a walled garden? But isn't one of the biggest advantages of Android the freedom to install anything you want from any place you want?

      Yes. And you're also free to set yourself on fire but that doesn't mean you're going to do it.

    44. Re: Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IOS users pay for their apps, android appeals to juvenile pirates.

    45. Re: Start over by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      The Stage Fright vulnerability didn't involve installing software from shady app stores.

      The Android security model is a sad joke. For instance just for an app to be able to lower its volume when a phone call comes in, you have to give it permission to monitor your phone calls and to know the details of the call. You also have to give an app all requested permissions at launch for it to work and you can't turn permissions off for an app after it is installed. When you install a third party keyboard on Android, you are basically installing a key logger. With iOS when you install a third party keyboard on iOS, you have to give it explicit permission to access the network.

    46. Re: Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because I no enough to be root and control my software doesn't mean I should pay some such fee for a convenient installer. Android is for boss users. If you can not fight a malware invasion it's not for you. Get a windows phone or iOS if that's the type of bed wetting liberal hand holding you need to make a phone call.

    47. Re: Start over by segin · · Score: 1

      Care to cite your sources? Or are you just shilling away for another payday?

    48. Re: Start over by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      Sources?

      For the highly publicized Stage Fright vulnerability?

      For the fact that on Android you have to give apps all of the requested permissions or you can't run it?

      For the fact that Android has no built in facility to turn off permissions granularly once you install it?

      For the fact that a third party keyboard has full network access and can hypothetically send every keystroke over the Internet?

    49. Re:Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Android ... Just download an app that locks out the Settings app (the app will be for apps in general, just pick the settings)... seems simple enough.

    50. Re: Start over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err... keyboard apps have to request network access on Android. If you don't trust the developer, why are you installing the app? Just because you click no on an i thing doesn't mean they're not doing other shady things like freely accessing gyroscope to see what you're typing (google it - it's a thing). For me, I'd rather not have a million prompts interrupting my user experience - if I don't trust the developer, I won't install the app at all.

      You also realize that jail breaks are effectively Stagefright. It's a privilege escalation vulnerability (that was fixed faster than i os' jb bugs). As long as the device can be jb'd, there's a major security vulnerability blowing right past SF.

    51. Re: Start over by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The Stage Fright vulnerability didn't involve installing software from shady app stores.

      Yes you're right. So with 900million potentially affected devices Android should be rife with malware in ways that should make the Blaster worm blush. right? right? ... *crickets*

      Stage-fright has not been exploited in a self-replicating way. In order to do anything with it you need to know the specifics of the device you're targeting AND also hope that it's one of the 4.3% of devices out there that doesn't have a version of Android that includes ASLR.

      The effects of the bug didn't turn out to be anywhere nearly as serious as the name implied and it isn't actively exploited in the wild. So ... next example?

      The Android security model is a sad joke. For instance just for an app to be able to lower its volume when a phone call comes in, you have to give it permission to monitor your phone calls and to know the details of the call. You also have to give an app all requested permissions at launch for it to work and you can't turn permissions off for an app after it is installed.

      No you don't. You need to give it permission if you want to monitor the phone state continuously in the background while on a call instead of relying on the OS to hand back to the app. You also don't need permission to see if another app is attempting to get audio focus, such as the phone ringing. What you're describing is lazy developers taking an approach that they think is right and easy without actually doing research. You only need the READ_PHONE_STATE permission if you have an app that intends to steal audio back in the middle of the call such as say an alarm. There's also a debate at the moment about whether the IMEI should be able to be read out with a different permission as there's more reasons to read an IMEI than for instance to know the current phone number of an ongoing call.

      Android permissions are continuously evolving, and that makes a lot of developers lazy.

      When you install a third party keyboard on Android, you are basically installing a key logger. With iOS when you install a third party keyboard on iOS, you have to give it explicit permission to access the network.

      Which every keyboard app does anyway because they incorporate an online spell checking system including the ability to download multiple languages. What's your point?

    52. Re: Start over by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No he's right about everything, and yet dead wrong about the actual impact that any of what he said has on actual users.

    53. Re:Start over by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      In other words voluntarily lock yourself into a walled garden? But isn't one of the biggest advantages of Android the freedom to install anything you want from any place you want?

      Sure it is, but when you get malware and other crap ... don't bitch to the rest of the world. Nobody said it would be safe, merely that you are free to do it if you want.

      The problem is that even stuff which comes from the official Android stores are barely above what I'd call malware ... they all want access to your contact list, phone, and everything else. Many of them send a lot of your data to ad servers and other parties without you explicitly knowing what is being sent to who and for which purposes.

      It's like owning a PC ... if you install random shit from the internet without knowing what it is, don't complain when you get malware.

      I've taken to uninstalling a LOT of apps from my Android devices, precisely because I don't trust them, and Google has made it impossible for me to do things like deciding on an app-by-app basis what I'm really going to allow it to do. So instead you install a calculator app that wants access to your contact list ... the intelligent solution is to say no, because a calculator doesn't need that shit.

      Even legitimate Android apps are often little more than ad and analytics platforms.

      Any functionality which can be accomplished with either a built-in app, or with a web-page ... delete the damned app. It's probably offering you very little, and invading your privacy a lot. I've gone back and realized there's just so much crap in apps that many of them I simply have tossed.

      The GPs advice is good, and has been good for years: don't install random shit if you don't know where it came from, don't assume software is trustworthy, and stop acting like every app which you want to install has any business with even half the permissions it wants.

      All those apps that want your contact information and to be able to change your network status and all that .. if they don't need these perms for their core function ... they're pretty much asking for carte blanche so they can monetize your experience.

      Either you follow good security practices, or you don't. But if you don't, that's kind of for you to own. You can't have it both ways.

      If you want to be free of a walled garden and install anything you want ... you are your own security, for good or for ill.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    54. Re:Start over by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      No. with a free developers account you can compile on X-code and run in an emulator. To actually get the app onto your device you will have to pay for their $100/year developer account.

      That all of course is not even including the price of actually purchasing a Mac.

  3. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have a Nexus 6. Google have provided useful applicatons that shipped with the device. I don't download anything from the Google Play store. Full stop. I don't need or want anything that did not come with the phone. One reason for going with the Nexus devices is I get a guaranteed update path and a steady stream of patches unlike going with say, Samsung from a carrier. I know friends who go months before getting patches.

    1. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sounds about as useful as the original iPhone 1 then...

    2. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP here. How so? What else do I need. If I live in the Google universe and use their tool offerings, what am I lacking? There are no tools out there I have even considered using outside of the ones on the device. Also, I'm in IT so I'm aware of the various ecosystems and what they offer, but I've never been tempted.

    3. Re: Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amusingly, the original iPhone was about standards for web based content. Developers said, "Fuck that. Open it up."

    4. Re:Easy by Beck_Neard · · Score: 0

      Android updates almost always cause significant system slow-down, often on purpose. This leaves people with the tough choice of either not updating - which results in a potentially vulnerable system - or having to play the updating Russian roulette. Some people choose not to update and I can't say I blame them. The android vendors need to get their shit together and stop dishing out crippling updates.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    5. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another reason I chose to go with the Nexus phone. Straight from Google, updates received and installed moments after they are released. Never a problem, no slowdowns.

    6. Re: Easy by Karlt1 · · Score: 2

      So the only way that you don't get malware and get OS updates (for maybe two years) is by buying the phone from the same company that makes the OS. That sounds like a wall gardened to me

      But then you said you don't install any apps. That's more like a walled desert.

    7. Re: Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like I've tried to explain above, it's not a "desert" if I never intended to use anything else. There is not a single app that I have ever felt compelled to download and install. Ever. I don't play games, so no games. I refuse to use my bank's app on my phone, as I don't trust it. I fail to see how I am missing out on anything to be honest. I primarily use my phone for texting and emails, sometimes calls. Anything else requires a real computer.

    8. Re: Easy by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      How is it a walled garden, when you aren't limited to the Google app store? In most cases, you aren't even limited to the Google-supplied OS on the phone. From another side, iOS is a walled garden because there's a single source of software, curated by Apple. If they allowed other app stores on an un-jailbroken iPhone, no one would call them "walled" either.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    9. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " If I live in the Google universe"... Well, then you already have a malware-infested device. All of Google's apps are the fucking definition of malware. They upload every single detail about your life to their servers. Congratulations!

  4. Jumping to the conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "the recently degraded performance of which leads me to believe that it's infected with malware. "

    Occam's razor says your degraded performance is much more likely to be due to more mundane reasons like incompetent apps / OS (Google, here's looking at you), than malware.

    1. Re:Jumping to the conclusion by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yep, the questioner's phone isn't infected by malware. He bought into the paranoid rants about Android malware that are 99% bullshit.

      If he only downloaded apps from Play he is safe. Google scan every app for malware. He's done a malware scan too. There is nothing wrong. Any performance issues are likely just because he installed a ton of crapware, much of which is now pinging advertising servers that are marked as "bad" on various hosts file lists but are actually just mundane.

      Uninstall some stuff, see if the situation improves. Or wipe back to factory and this time install one app at a time and see if it kills performance. A handy tip is to look at the battery use screen and see which apps are chewing up energy.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Jumping to the conclusion by garbut · · Score: 1

      Replying to undo a mismod

      --
      Oh, should I have sugar-coated that?
    3. Re: Jumping to the conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's the future we all dreamed of.

    4. Re:Jumping to the conclusion by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

      MOD PARENT UP, this is exactly it.

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    5. Re:Jumping to the conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      more likely it's preloaded spyware from the carrier. since many apps now hide their traffic by using the android system services, it's near impossible to narrow down which app is doing it.

      i really hate it because many are setup to quietly sleep when the phone is "off", but when you turn it on they immediately phone home. it gets so bad that you need to turn on a phone and wait a bit before you can use an app that uses the network like google maps.

    6. Re:Jumping to the conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      must not be a very good malware scanner then

      my product finds malware on your device *every single time* you run it

      it even gives you contact information for paid experts at my company that
      will remove that malware over the phone and keep you, your data and
      your family safe

      whats not to love?

    7. Re:Jumping to the conclusion by caseih · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I have an older phone and lately it's been getting slower and slower and kills apps more frequently as memory is tighter now. I don't have many apps, and I don't auto update the apps. The only thing on the phone that automatically updates are the Google Play Services and the Google Play apps, which update often and silently. Both are much much bigger than they used to be. It's kind of out of control.

      The worse thing about the Android ecosystem is the complete lack of version control. Once an update is pushed to the store, all traces of the older versions are gone forever it seems. I've learned the hard way to back all apps up with titanium backup before upgrading any app because you can't roll back updates any other way. And several times an app I really like gets "upgraded" to be completely less useful than it was before. I've been burned a few times that ways so now I always check the little change log in google play and if it doesn't mention security I am much less likely to bother, especially if the app works well. I really wish there was an option to make google play updates and google play services updates such that I am informed when they are ready to update.

    8. Re:Jumping to the conclusion by jrumney · · Score: 1
      If I was the original poster, I'd be more worried about

      a friend who noticed a lot of strange activity coming from my phone's IP — sorry, I don't have the logs, but he pointed out that there were pings coming from my phone to a lot of sketchy addresses

    9. Re:Jumping to the conclusion by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Turning off notifications and background functions on apps also helps a lot. If you have four or five 'news' apps all waiting to pop up a headline and a few games making sounds when the cows need feeding, there are a lot of background tasks running, many of which can be disabled in the App Settings.

    10. Re:Jumping to the conclusion by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Not even Google Play is safe.

      But you have to take into account that there are possible holes that can be utilized when you visit web pages or open messages. Even OTA SMS is a risk.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    11. Re:Jumping to the conclusion by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Pretty much what I thought as soon as I read TFS.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    12. Re:Jumping to the conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the recently degraded performance of which leads me to believe that it's infected with malware. "

      That's just the effect of all these "legitimate" apps keeping the CPU busy with uploading your private data and serving ads. You could call that malware, but it's not the kind of malware Google tries to keep out of the app store.

  5. Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't need or want anything that did not come with the phone.

    Well that sounds like a Sweet Solution.

  6. How about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You rejoice because it means your favourite OS is more popular than iOS, then you pay the malware scanner tax with considerably less enthusiasm.

  7. Verification by Ash-Fox · · Score: 2

    I have a fairly new, fairly fancy phone running Android Lollipop, the recently degraded performance of which leads me to believe that it's infected with malware. That, and a friend who noticed a lot of strange activity coming from my phone's IP â" sorry, I don't have the logs

    I don't believe your friend. Verify it yourself first.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    1. Re:Verification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you never installed anything from other than the playstore, I doubt you have malware, despite the
      AV companies telling you how important their services are, and how Microsoft and Apple both
      say Android malware is extremely prevalent. I don't know a single person who has gotten
      Android malware, even once. And I co-run an Android group.

  8. top by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My android phone can overlay the screen with some version of Linux top. The shown CPU load numbers sometimes shoot up as high as 50, and the rest of the time it's usually over 5, while it should be below 1.0, and close to 0 when idle. Yet non of the processes in the list below it show significant CPU usage.
    Battery drains in a few hours. An identical phone, same type, same age and mostly the same apps doesn't have this problem.
    Has anyone noticed a similarly high CPU load? I can't find this problem on google.

    1. Re: top by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Try the open source app OS Monitor. Network and 'top' info. See the 'battery' usage under regular device settings before it dies to see offenders.

  9. Things to consider by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 5, Informative

    In case you got a sophisticated piece of malware which installed a rootkit into your bootloader or system partition, a simple factory reset will *not* help, so your *only safe* remedy is to reflash your phone *completely*. Google for "Reflash Nexus 6" or follow this link: http://forum.xda-developers.co...

    After that make sure you install apps *only* from Google Play and you have "Allow Unknown Sources" under Security disabled. Make sure that the apps you install have a considerable number of positive reviews and the apps make use of sane permissions.

    Make sure you're the only person who uses your smartphone, because other people may do things you'll regret later. If you absolutely need to let someone use your phone, activate a guest account for them and let them run only the apps they need.

    Create a decent password for your lock screen (at least six digits) and make sure your phone locks after a period of inactivity.

    If you're extremely paranoid, before installing an app, find its offline version, i.e. apk (they are usually easily googeable) and run it through virustotal.com (I usually do that when I install unpopular dubious apps).

    1. Re:Things to consider by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1

      One more thing: never disregard system updates. Install them right away. Perhaps you were p0wned via the stagefright vulnerability. Try to recall if you received MMS'es from unknown people lately.

    2. Re:Things to consider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sane permissions? You obviously have never visited the Google Play Store ;p

    3. Re:Things to consider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or known people who were infected and spamming their contact list.

    4. Re:Things to consider by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      Who downloads apps from outside the app store? That's practically begging for trouble.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    5. Re:Things to consider by nadaou · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To be fair I've more faith in apps from f-droid.org than in I do in apps from the Play store. The flashlight and music player apps there don't want access to your contacts list, unique ID, and wifi connections. And their code seems to be more highly vetted than those in the Play store.

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    6. Re:Things to consider by tepples · · Score: 1

      F-Droid also tended to be lacking in high-production-value games the last time I checked.

    7. Re:Things to consider by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      I agree - some apps installed want access to all the stuff on the phone without constraints even when I don't see a reason for it. And there's no way to exclude the access rights and still install the app.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    8. Re:Things to consider by nadaou · · Score: 2

      It has Robotfindskitten, what else does anyone need?

      (ok, ok, there's no Moon Buggy, yet)

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    9. Re:Things to consider by tepples · · Score: 1

      It has Robotfindskitten

      So does anything with an NES emulator, since I made a robotfindskitten implementation for NES. But a text game with about 2.5K of code that someone could hack up in a night doesn't quite qualify as "high-production-value games".

      , what else does anyone need?

      I was referring to, say, a first-person shooter or action-adventure game with characters more detailed than smiley faces or stick figures and environments more detailed than just a bunch of featureless boxes.

    10. Re:Things to consider by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

      I would like to see better sand-boxing in Android. Even if an app has a legit reason to access x, y and/or z, the option to divert the access to a "fake" x, y and/or z would be very useful. And each app would have its own sandbox, so the fakes are not shared between apps. The fakes would act like the the real things. For example, fake contacts would contain a few "preloaded" default contacts. It could even allow the app to add a very few contacts to the fake.

      Any app that refused to work because it detected a fake should not be allowed.

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    11. Re:Things to consider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

      I would like to see similar functionality in other mobile operating systems as well. It should be totally up to the user if s/he will choose to provide real or fake input per requested resource.

    12. Re:Things to consider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was referring to, say, a first-person shooter or action-adventure game with characters more detailed than smiley faces or stick figures and environments more detailed than just a bunch of featureless boxes.

      Why would you want to waste perfectly good storage, network bandwidth and battery life on a chopped-up, crappy interface, crappy user experience "AAA" game port on a mobile phone instead of using a dedicated mobile gaming device? I don't understand why people feel the need to try and make a phone do something it wasn't designed to do.

  10. Stop side-loading pirated apps! by jomcty · · Score: 1

    Factory reset you phone and stop side-loading shady/pirated apps and you'll be fine. I've never had an issue with malware on Android and I been using it for over five years now (N6).

  11. Re:android malware by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

    Does it have to be AVG?
    btw, I have an older Samsung with no update-path unless I choose to root it. I have essentially blocked the stock browser and have disabled MMS.

    --
    Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
  12. Change your smartphone habits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't do anything sensitive on my smartphone because of the lack of security (physical and logical security). I don't login to my email, banking, or any other sensitive accounts. I don't pay bills with my phone. I realize that might not be an option for some people, but it works for me and I don't worry about malware getting on it. I find my life much more simple to do most of my computer business on the desktop, and leave my smart phone to web browsing and a few apps. If malware gets on my phone, so what? If security is important to you on your phone, you are better off fitting into the walled garden.

  13. Sounds Like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Microsoft or Apple ad. FUD anyone?

  14. No posts about antivirus yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Factory reset;

    2. Antivirus;

    3. Don't do the usual dumb stuff you wouldn't do on Windows, i.e.

    - don't run outdated mainstream software;
    - don't run random software downloaded from random sites;
    - always run an adblocker to stop malicious ads;
    - don't visit little-known pron/warez/similarly reputable sites outside of a sandbox (i.e. not at all, on your 'phone).

  15. Look through the logs by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Informative

    a friend who noticed a lot of strange activity coming from my phone's IP — sorry, I don't have the logs, but he pointed out that there were pings coming from my phone to a lot of sketchy addresses — which pretty much seals the deal.

    Pull out WireShark and see what's getting sent. I consider advertisers to be "sketchy addresses," and I think your friend is probably a noob if he didn't show you what was in the packets.
    If you're not interested in doing that, then just factory reset your phone.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  16. Get yourself a real phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. from a company that understands security: Blackberry.

    Who am I kidding, no one cares about security these days, it's all about OOOOH, Shiny!

    Sad.

  17. Nuke it from Orbit. Only way to be sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuke it from Orbit. Only way to be sure.

    And stop using all those "social" apps. THAT is the real issue.

  18. firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best to root, then use AFWall+ (play store). Even malicious apps won't connect to the network. If not rooting, use Mobiwol (play store). Since it creates an internal VPN, it can track traffic so you don't have to read through iptables logs.

    If rooted, install AdAway (f-droid store) to block junk from the few apps you let through your firewall. Also with root, buy Titanium Backup (play store) and "freeze" all unwanted apps that come with a stock Rom.

    Takes some initial setup, but then you never have to dick with it (until you update the OS, which if you have the above, you only need major releases).

  19. Wipe it with stock or CM, then... by thedarb · · Score: 2

    ...don't install stuff you don't need. Don't pirate apps. Educate yourself via XDA on what is safe, what is not, and what apps are simply performance suckers.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:Wipe it with stock or CM, then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How safe is stuff hosted on XDA? I'm genuinely interested because the only updated builds for Galaxy Note phones, that don't drop TouchWiz and all the stylus functionality, can be found there, but I'm not aware of any audits being done on them. Half the mod authors speak broken english too, which doesn't inspire confidence in their abilities, or has a childish "I made this, don't re-use my stuff" mentality.

  20. Trust nothing, not even me by TrimTabTim · · Score: 2

    As with life, you need to think and act for yourself a bit here. No free and easy answers, but it's unlikely that you're "infected", you probably just have a lot of bloatware apps draining resources and spying on you. Remember, the boundary between malware and adware/spyware is thin indeed, so your best bet is to start at the beginning and re-think your digital life.

    Everything we do on our phones fits into one of two broad categories:
    1. Personal and work life. Deeply private, sensitive and important communications with friends, family and colleagues. 2. Time Wasting / Entertainment / Infotainment. Reading news, watching videos, games, app-du-jour, whatever.

    Given the state of our corporate overlords, there is no reasonable way if you care for your privacy and safety to have both sets of functions combined into one device. You got into your predicament by not realizing this. You seem like a conscientious fellow so here's a tip based on what I do:

    Get two devices:
    Phone 1: Email, voice and sms communications, photos. Nothing else. It's my life, both business and personal. NO APPS except the few which support these needs. No social crapware either. If posting that photo of my food can't wait until I get to my laptop, then it helps me realize that it isn't worth uploading - nobody wants to see it anyhow. Phone 2: A phablet with a data only 4g sim card (20 bucks a month for 3 gigs). Has apps, games and browsers for boring flights, lunch breaks, whatever. It can get p0wned, i don't care, as it's registered to a disposable gmail account and contains no personally identifying info apart from the 4g account which Vodafone can spy on. I could drop it in the trash and lose nothing but the cash to buy another, and the 3 gigs is plenty for all my time wasting needs each month.

    For phone 1, you can only be reasonably confident it is clean if you get the phone new, and discipline yourself to not fill it up with crapware. You may root the phone to remove the factory installed bloat ware, but never to side-load even more sketchy apps. Trust nothing.

    For phone 2, it hardly matters what you do as long as you don't fill it up with your private life. Have fun and enjoy if it ever gets malware. Wipe it if it ever gets slow and re-install the apps you enjoyed most. If any of these apps want to make your life "convenient" by tapping into the stuff on Phone number 1: stop. You're welcome.

    It is a shit idea to mix the two spheres, because remember, all of the app authors in the world just want to monetize your life. They aren't writing the apps because they love you, or because they are good Samaritans. Every last one of them (with a few notable exceptions) wants a paycheck. So don't be used, be a user.

  21. simple answer by lkcl · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    What's your approach to detecting and dealing with Android malware?

    don't use android. this is not said in a sarcastic, troll-baiting, flame-fest-demanding or other meaninglessly fucking stupid way or any other way which is to be misunderstood, either accidentally or deliberately. it is said in a simple factual way. if you use a monoculture OS, supplied in binary form only and, for commercial (profit prioritisation) reasons not properly supported by the manufacturer (no, google is NOT the manufacturer of the world's 3rd party android mobile phones, they are the supplier of REFERENCE platform source code which 3rd party manufacturers then take and produce their own customisation and binaries from, and because of the huge fuck-ups that have occurred when 3rd party manufacturers do that, they've been forced to do "flagship" products demonstrating how to do it correctly... but even so they *still* haven't managed to get round the huge "monoculture" problem), then i'm sorry to have to be the messenger here but just like when you run any other proprietary binary-only monoculture OS, then plain and simple, you get everything that you deserve: viruses, malware and more.

    now, if someone wants to go and vote the paragraph above down just because it's quotes not nice quotes, i really don't give a monkey's. fact is, i don't use android, therefore i don't get android malware. no complications, no desire to risk my data or my time dealing with other people's crap proprietary "pseudo-open" software. got a problem with that? i genuinely don't care.

  22. Ask your friend by p.g.king · · Score: 2

    "That, and a friend who noticed a lot of strange activity coming from my phone's IP"

    Sound's like your friend is a load more steps ahead than the rest of us, who have none of the information he was working to. He noticed somehow (no detail here), and he know which sites and which he believes are sketchy. Sounds like the best source of help is this friend.

    1. Re:Ask your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      somehow (no detail here)

      Could be that data connections are using Wi-Fi. I recommend using Wi-Fi as it requires lower power than transmitting all the way to a tower that may be some number of miles away. Well, if you're going through Wi-Fi, the friend may be able to sniff the traffic. I'm not sure that is what actually happened, but it's so straight-forward reasonable that there's no reason to doubt it.

      It's like saying that I bought a new television from the mall. Granted, there's no proof or evidence to suggest that I drove my own car to the mall to accomplish the task, but I doubt that many of my friends will start asking whether I used our local convoluted bus system, or flew a helicopter. They'll probably just assume I did the reasonable thing.

    2. Re:Ask your friend by p.g.king · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between "noticed" and "went looking for", my assumption is that the friend actually went looking for it, knows which sites are "sketchy" etc. My point merely was that if you trust the friend enough to know how to do this, know what they are looking for etc. then they also would be the ones to give you further advice. This person has far more information than everyone guessing here.

  23. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flash a known good ROM with source, do not flash Gapps, audit the certificate store, use F-Droid and take back control. I'll decide what's safe or not, Google.

  24. specifically, Facebook by raymorris · · Score: 5, Informative

    In particular, I wonder if the Facebook app is installed. It's pretty nasty. If you're not a Facebook-aholic, just use your browser to access facebook.com. If you ARE on Facebook 30 times per day or more, recognize that it's having a significant negative impact on your phone (and probably your life), then decide what you want to do.

  25. Meh, Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The worst part about malware in Android is that your phone's manufacturer will likely never provide you with a patch and you'll keep getting infected.

  26. Apple has two ecosystems, Mac could work ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    I guess they could have put it in Apple`s Walled Prison right

    There are two Apple ecosystems, iOS and Mac OS X, both offer app stores where every app is subject to review. The Mac ecosystem also allows a user to download apps directly from a manufacturer. In other words on the Mac if the supplier is trustworthy you can go direct. If the supplier is an unknown you can go app store so you know its been reviewed. Google could have gone this route and reviewed apps on Google play while still allowing side loading for users who wanted to take the risk or who were dealing with reliable direct sources. They still could go that route and begin reviewing apps.

  27. Google Nexus devices are only way to go Android by perpenso · · Score: 2

    At least the Apple works and have a longer span of vendor support. Scoff all you want but I can keep my devices longer as they're both longer lived and longer supported.

    The person having the malware problem and asking questions is using a Nexus 6. That's a product from Google and it gets all upgrades. IMHO the Nexus devices are the only way to go with Android, you are sure of getting long term support and upgrades. For Android development I have a Nexus 4, a 2012 device, and it upgrades to the most recent version of Android.

    1. Re:Google Nexus devices are only way to go Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wonderful advice, unless you travel. If you have to go to a lot of place west of the Mississippi, Verizon can often be your only reliable choice for a network. And Verizon only has the crippled 32gb version, with no memory expansion. I'm often gone for 2-4 weeks at a time, with as much as 20 hours on airplanes during that time, and I can't fit enough off-line movies, etc. into a 32gb phone to make it though. Sorry Google, not everyone is always connected.

    2. Re:Google Nexus devices are only way to go Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The 64gb Nexus 6 works fine on Verizon. Also, all of the Nexus 6s support USB OTG. Plug a flash drive in and you get plenty of storage.

    3. Re:Google Nexus devices are only way to go Android by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Do they make flash drives capable of making up for the headless state of USB connection? Seems to me that you would need something almost a computer in order to handle the interchange overhead or whatever it is called in order to transfer the files on and off the phone. At that point, you really don't need the phone or tablet any more.

  28. Re:android malware by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    https://play.google.com/store/... came with my phone. Seems to be fine, though it too chatty for my liking. I'm not sure if it's a speed app that talks about security, or a security app that talks about speed. It seems to mainly work by shutting down background processes. Though it's domination of the running apps to make sure nothing is running, so it extends battery life, takes more battery life than the background apps did. But I haven't really played around with it much, came with the last update, and didn't get in the way too much.

  29. install ad blocking app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most likely random or malicious seeming network traffic is due to advertising calls. root and install http://adfree.odiousapps.com/ adaway by bigtincan.. hell i'd say root it and have fun with it. if you have a virus or malware it's probably the easiest way to find and remove it.

  30. Simple- don't be stupid by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"What's your approach to detecting and dealing with Android malware"

    Um, not turning on "allow unknown sources" and then installing a bunch of stolen/sketchy/unknown crap from shady/strange/random/unknown places. It mostly really is that simple. I have never had malware on any of my many Android devices.

  31. slowing down is normal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As your load more apps that feel that they most always be loaded into memory ready to go, and eat up cpu while doing much next to nothing other than spy on the user, your device will get slower and slower. And if you upgrade from kitkat to lollipop you'll also feel the hit.

  32. Nope, not malware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you describe

  33. Android Malware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hate to say it, the Android malware issue made up my mind to go with a Windows phone a year ago.

  34. What To Do About Android Malware? by nickweller · · Score: 1

    What To Do About Android Malware? The answer it not to download and install it from unreliable sites ...

  35. Uninstall constantly updating apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep an eye on your updates and uninstall apps that update all the time. I think a lot of malicious android apps are functionality that's implemented in modules that are regularly downloaded as updates for the original malicious app.

  36. Trash it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not trolling, this is why I carry an iPhone

  37. Get an iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teehee!

  38. just get an iphone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do people waste their lives with this off-brand android bullshit...

  39. Two Cracked apps by tepples · · Score: 1

    Just avoid the less reputable ones until you learn the basics of computer use, like not installing dodgy cracked apps

    I agree: someone new to Android should stick to the reputable repositories, which are Google Play, Amazon, and F-Droid, and avoid any app that seeks administrative permissions unless required by an employer. But if there are two apps for reading Cracked on a reputable store, how do I know which are and aren't dodgy? There's the official app but also a third-party app.

    1. Re:Two Cracked apps by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      I agree: someone new to Android should stick to the reputable repositories, which are Google Play, Amazon, and F-Droid

      Did this. Still got adware and popups and degraded performance.

    2. Re:Two Cracked apps by tepples · · Score: 1

      Developers need to eat. Therefore developers do what's profitable. Something the majority does not adopt is unprofitable. The majority prefers adware to paid apps. What's the solution that allows developers to eat?

    3. Re:Two Cracked apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. The number of downloads and reviews that are on the app's page don't help at all. ...wait...

    4. Re:Two Cracked apps by tepples · · Score: 1

      Isn't download count the "if everyone was jumping off a bridge" argument? Over a billion people have downloaded the Facebook and Facebook Messenger apps, yet Facebook is still considered intrusive by many Slashdot users.

  40. Then make a point of buying Nexus by tepples · · Score: 1

    In other words, all Windows PCs are like unlocked Nexus phones: they get updates directly from the operating system publisher.

    1. Re:Then make a point of buying Nexus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, all Windows PCs are like unlocked Nexus phones: they get updates directly from the operating system publisher.

      even with a locked nexus, you can grab the update and sideload it

  41. Early iOS's web standard support was anemic by tepples · · Score: 1

    Amusingly, the original iPhone was about standards for web based content.

    Yet the web browser in iOS didn't support web access to the accelerometer until iOS 4, <input type="file"> until iOS 6, nor WebGL until iOS 8.

  42. Lollipop on Nexus 7 has multi-second pauses by tepples · · Score: 1

    Yet somehow my Nexus 7 (2012; codename grouper) tablet got much slower when upgrading from KitKat (4.4) to Lollipop (5.0 and 5.1). It gets so bad that the UI has multi-second pauses if the Google Play Store app is downloading or installing an application update in the background. And it's not just an app's UI; it's the system UI including swiping down from the top.

    1. Re:Lollipop on Nexus 7 has multi-second pauses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nexus 7 (2012) as a whole has a problem. Its a known problem with the storage subsystem (hardware) about the only way to make the nexus 7 usable after awhile is to manually ftrim the filesystem. Can do it from a command prompt or find one of the many "lag fixer" apps on the playstore.

      I've sworn to never buy anything with an nvidia SOC after dealing with that.

    2. Re:Lollipop on Nexus 7 has multi-second pauses by tepples · · Score: 1

      Yet another problem that can only be fixed with a backup, factory reset, and root.

  43. Depositing checks by tepples · · Score: 1

    I don't login to my email, banking, or any other sensitive accounts. I don't pay bills with my phone.

    So how do you deposit paper checks?

    Occasionally I receive a paper check from a relative who tells me she's too old and set in her ways to consider using the electronic funds transfer button on the bank's website. Some other people may be working for employers that issue paper checks because they are too small to offer payroll direct deposit. Chase Bank has a check deposit app for phones, which operates by photographing the front and back of a check with the phone's rear-facing camera, but none for desktop computers. (A Chase representative confirmed this to me.) During much of the year, I ride my bicycle to an ATM seven minutes away from my house and deposit the check there. But during about one-third of the year, the weather makes cycling impractical.

    1. Re:Depositing checks by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      I have never used paper checks the last 20 years. They are considered obsolete here.

      Even at shops you are almost a suspect for fraud if you show up with a check unless you are over 70.

      Every employer here do direct deposit to your bank account - it's even simpler for them than to produce a check.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Depositing checks by tepples · · Score: 1

      I have never used paper checks the last 20 years. They are considered obsolete here.

      So how do individuals send payments to individuals, especially if the sender doesn't subscribe to a cellular data plan?

      Even at shops you are almost a suspect for fraud if you show up with a check unless you are over 70.

      Which this relative is. In shops, she pays with her debit card, but she mails checks with birthday cards and the like.

      Every employer here do direct deposit to your bank account

      So should someone who gets "I'm sorry; our payroll processor declined my request to add direct deposit" update his resume?

    3. Re:Depositing checks by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      I have never used paper checks the last 20 years. They are considered obsolete here.

      So how do individuals send payments to individuals, especially if the sender doesn't subscribe to a cellular data plan?

      Direct bank transfers or cash. Sometimes indirect transfers through a payment service.

      Even at shops you are almost a suspect for fraud if you show up with a check unless you are over 70.

      Which this relative is. In shops, she pays with her debit card, but she mails checks with birthday cards and the like.

      Every employer here do direct deposit to your bank account

      So should someone who gets "I'm sorry; our payroll processor declined my request to add direct deposit" update his resume?

      In the rare case someone don't have a bank account that a direct transfer can be done to then it's a question of cash, but those cases are so rare that checks won't work either because there's nowhere to cash the checks without finding a bank office that can do it, and you need a bank account to cash a check - so back to the fact that it would happen so rarely that it's going to cause problems.

      Checks are obsolete here.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  44. Non-Five Eyes countries by tepples · · Score: 1

    Half the mod authors speak broken english too

    But I'm willing to bet that their English is better than your Polish, or German, or whatever language is official in the non-Five Eyes countries where mod authors tend to live.

  45. Re:specifically, Facebook by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    Or you can just switch off notifications all the stuff you don't care about, and set it to sync rarely. Problem solved.

    I have a wakelock analysis program installed and Facebook is never in the top ten.

  46. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move to iOS

  47. The best thing you can do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Admit you're an open sores sheep. Get Toreball's dick out of your mouth and RMS's dick out of your ass.

  48. Educate people on their freedoms to do dumb things by DrXym · · Score: 1
    Virtually all of this malware comes from warez sites and other dubious sources malvertising etc. If people are really so dumb as to download "sexy girl screensaver" or some cracked software which asks for ALL the permissions then they get everything they deserve.

    Stick to the official store or a trusted third party one. It's highly unlikely that you will be infected and if by misfortune you are, there is a chance that the software can be remotely killed and removed before it does any harm.

  49. Look at the Facebook app permissions and terms by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Have a good look at all the permissions that the Facebook app has. I know, it'll take quite a long time to read the whole list. Then look at the terms of use. You've solved a small part of the problem. You are of course free to make your own decisions. Thoee decisions are not without costs.

  50. Hummmm.... by HugoBotas · · Score: 1

    Root -> xposed -> xprivacy -> Done

  51. A few choices... by sigmabody · · Score: 1

    - Complete, firmware-level wipe (if possible, depends on phone model), re-installation of stock firmware, or...
    - Complete, firmware-level wipe (if possible, depends on phone model), installation of custom ROM (which will support some of the phone functionality, depending on ROM), and...
    - Avoid anything not from the google app store, and any app requiring high-level permissions, and any app requiring access you don't want it to have, or...

    - Get an iPhone (which is not 100% safe, but safer than essentially any Android configuration, with the "walled garden" drawback)

    Those are your options if you're concerned about malware on your mobile device at this point.

  52. Re: android malware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take it you did not read the article on slashdot yesterday about avg changing their TOS.
    They now collect all your data and sell it to advertisers. So go ahead and install malware to delete the malware. Very smart indeed.

  53. Talk of online transfers makes her go redneck by tepples · · Score: 1

    In the rare case someone don't have a bank account that a direct transfer can be done to then it's a question of cash

    She has a bank account capable of direct transfer. Though she routinely uses her bank's web site to check her balance, she is unwilling to learn to use its online form for sending a direct transfer: "I'm old and set in my ways, and I ain't usin' no online transfer." She breaks into the redneck dialect that she reserves for when she is frustrated and understands that her appeal to emotion and tradition is invalid. To her, the alternative to a check is not paying at all. So during the cycling off-season, when daily high temperatures can be below the freezing point of water at 1 atmosphere, I'm back to holding live checks for several days at a time until I otherwise have an opportunity to be near one of my bank's ATMs that takes deposits.

    Or should most people buy a car to work around receiving the occasional paper check?

    1. Re:Talk of online transfers makes her go redneck by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      That's right - if you get a personal check it can be a headache to get money from it around here, so private transactions are very rarely done with checks these days since it requires that you have a good bank where you actually can transfer the check to your account - and you often have to pay a fee for it too.

      Direct transfers are free of charge.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  54. Easy by bigdavex · · Score: 1

    Install a restraining bolt.

    --
    -Dave
  55. Re: Google Nexus devices are only way to go Androi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am in Laos (SE Asia) and spend time in Seattle and MD. No problems since I use prepaid where ever I go. T-Mobile mobile seems to work for US coverage. And there are very reasonable local options every where else. options

  56. windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Phone and tablet. Also on my desktop.

  57. Tier between text and AAA by tepples · · Score: 1

    Why would you want to waste perfectly good storage, network bandwidth and battery life on a chopped-up, crappy interface, crappy user experience "AAA" game port on a mobile phone instead of using a dedicated mobile gaming device?

    Because there's a mid-tier between text (the example of robotfindskitten) and AAA, and not all games in this mid-tier happen to be ported to PlayStation Vita. Some games are from smaller studios that can't afford a simultaneous release across five platforms (Android, iOS, Windows Phone, PlayStation Vita, and Nintendo 3DS). Instead, they use revenue from one platform to fund a port to other platforms, and the platforms of least resistance tend to get the game first. Someone who visits the developer's web site might see something like this:

    Google Play (Android): [ Buy Now ]
    App Store (iPhone and iPad): Coming soon. To be notified of updates, [ Sign Up ]
    Windows Store (Windows Phone): Coming soon. To be notified of updates, [ Sign Up ]

    Other platforms: If you represent a licensed publisher interested in bringing this game to PlayStation Store and Nintendo e-Shop, [ Contact Us ]

    Or because your pocket and your cellular service budget are big enough for one device, not two or three.

  58. Re:specifically, Facebook by droptone · · Score: 1

    Or just install Tinfoil for Facebook which is just a wrapper on the mobile site and fairly limited in terms of the permissions needed.

    --
    Every post I make begins with the assumption P=~P.