Slashdot Mirror


India's Worrying Draft Encryption Policy

knwny writes: The government of India is working on a new National Encryption Policy the contents of which have raised a few alarms.Among other things, the policy states that citizens and businesses must save all encrypted messages (including personal or unofficial ones) and their plaintext copies for 90 days and make them available to law enforcement agencies as and when demanded. The policy also specifies that only the government of India shall define the algorithms and key sizes for encryption in India. The policy is posted on this website.

114 comments

  1. This should be interesting. by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What happens if, by accident or malicious intent, the storage medium you are using is destroyed? Or ironically enough, if you are attacked with malware that encrypts your drive. How do you explain that you can't decrypt the drive to so they can decrypt your messages? Or that the cloud solution provider you were using is down for a undetermined amount of time?

    --
    Restore the madness of youth's lechery
    1. Re:This should be interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are attacked with malware that encrypts your drive, the government questioning your encryption probably is the least of your concerns.

      Plus, you cannot be held responsible for things that you have no control over.

    2. Re:This should be interesting. by bigpat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What happens if, by accident or malicious intent, the storage medium you are using is destroyed? Or ironically enough, if you are attacked with malware that encrypts your drive. How do you explain that you can't decrypt the drive to so they can decrypt your messages? Or that the cloud solution provider you were using is down for a undetermined amount of time?

      It depends what you are accused of and how politically connected or rich you are. Seriously, a law like this is meant as a catch all that nobody will be able to ensure their compliance with. Basically it outlaws encryption for all practical purposes. So if you are accused of something, anything, and you happened to use encryption then at least they can jail or fine you on a technicality when they can't prove that any real crime has been committed.

    3. Re:This should be interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is like the UK's RIPA law. Say you do a SSL transaction with PFS enabled, you can be hauled into Crown Court, the judge asks for the session key (which is obviously long gone), and the dialog goes like this:

      Magistrate: "What is the session key to your web browsing session at www.cowsrus.com?"
      Arrestee: "No clue."
      Magistrate: "That is another four years to your sentence. Now what is the session key to your web browsing session at www.cowsrus.com?"

      Repeat until a life sentence is achieved. This is an easy legal tactic to keep someone (or their family members) locked up.

      The US is about as bad, but at least there are some Constitutional protections that are invokable.

      How does one protect against this? I wouldn't be surprised to see steganography tools (successors to TrueCrypt and VeraCrypt) advance, as well as offline methods of transporting information. Good old fashioned couriers are a lot harder to intercept as well.

    4. Re:This should be interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite simple.
      A "business person", usually of some high rank has not just one, but lots of business interests. Because of that, he'll outsource all this archiving to an external company, owned by "someone else". When the cops starts sniffing, the archives have an accidental fire that destroys or damages beyond recovery all the records.
      That archives company says "oops, sorry, it was an accident" and if anyone tries to pursue it, they'll discover the owners are impossible to trace.
      The "business person" will be surprised that the ones taking care of his archives are so sloppy and promises to do better next time.

      Well, to be honest, I have no idea how it would be done in India, but I know this is how it would be done in my country.

    5. Re:This should be interesting. by tapspace · · Score: 2

      If you are attacked with malware that encrypts your drive, the government questioning your encryption probably is the least of your concerns.

      Uhhh. What?

      Plus, you cannot be held responsible for things that you have no control over.

      False.

    6. Re:This should be interesting. by INT_QRK · · Score: 1

      Worse yet, what happens if you're a company doing business with Indian partners or subsidiaries and want to protect trade secrets and proprietary information? I would be further discouraged from doing such future business.

    7. Re:This should be interesting. by johanw · · Score: 2

      If you're interested in protecting that you would not do any buisiness with India in the first place.

    8. Re:This should be interesting. by INT_QRK · · Score: 1

      Correct, which India will need to assess to determine a law that works for them, and I, as a business, will need to assess how my risk tolerance bears on any decision to do further business with India.

    9. Re:This should be interesting. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      And that may be the kicker. Outsourcing to India is dead if this gets to law and common practice.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:This should be interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Magistrate: "What is the session key to your web browsing session at www.cowsrus.com?"
      Arrestee: "No clue."
      Magistrate: "That is another four years to your sentence. Now what is the session key to your web browsing session at www.cowsrus.com?"

      Repeat until a life sentence is achieved. This is an easy legal tactic to keep someone (or their family members) locked up.

      I call bullshit. For a car analogy, it'd be like asking the accused what the firing order of the engine in their car is. It isn't something the average person is going to know. Hell, until recently, I would not have even had enough knowledge to understand the question. Now, I barely have enough to ask it myself, so I might've even asked it wrong.

      Now, if the magistrate was asking for the username and password to www.cowsrus.com, and the accused said they did not know, sadly, you would seem to be correct.

    11. Re:This should be interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does one protect against this?

      Use the second lever labeled "amendment".

    12. Re:This should be interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      __AND__ the plaintext? Surely you are talking India! PLEASE, LET THEM DO...

  2. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are trying to make it easier for their enemies to disrupt them?

    1. Re:Easy by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      They're authoritarian morons, like most politicians and government officials in the security theater industry. Simpering, contemptible, evil morons.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  3. Do you have to prove they are no fake by NotInHere · · Score: 1

    ... or can you simply store some arbitrary log, and tell them it's your actual communication data?

  4. In other news... by Jon.Burgin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the use of Indian consultants is about to drop dramatically.

    1. Re:In other news... by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      "Dears, could you set the encryption on your tunnel to 56 bit please, sir? It is the maximum allowed by law, sir."

      The scary part is that many people will...

    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just scheduled a meeting on this topic, mostly because i had been looking for an excuse to get rid of our outsourced vendor...
      great fodder, india for the lulz

    3. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please do the needful.

    4. Re: In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let us know if any.

  5. India needs a policy on bathing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Until you require your citizens to bathe at least once a week, you don't get any say on technology.

    1. Re:India needs a policy on bathing by CRCulver · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Until you require your citizens to bathe at least once a week

      Look, I would be the first person to criticize Indian standards of hygiene and make one of those "Fix your problems X before doing Y, India" posts: after traveling around India for half a year, and just before I was supposed to fly out, I ended up spending nearly a month in a Delhi hospital after either drinking bad water or eating food that wasn't prepared in a sanitary fashion. The country has a big problem with ensuring treated water, disposing of sewage, and washing hands well when serving food.

      But where foreigners have no right to criticize Indians is bathing. Indians bathe regularly, and I've been impressed to see even the poorest of the poor using any public source of water they could to thoroughly scrub every morning. Indians know how much sweat and odor a tropical or sub-tropical climate could produce. It is often Westerners who are considered the unwashed there.

    2. Re:India needs a policy on bathing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm deal with my own BO that I have had 30+ years to get accustom too doing things like camping and military training. OR wash myself with their water that does not come from a bottle.

      I will stick with the stink.

    3. Re:India needs a policy on bathing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about supplying sanitation to the 500+ million Indian citizens who lack it? Does the Indian government have no shame?

    4. Re:India needs a policy on bathing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that many bathe in the Ganges - which is, for all practical purposes, a sewer.

    5. Re:India needs a policy on bathing by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      You just prove my point, my man. The issue isn't whether you are comfortable with your body odour, it's about how the people around you feel. Even when millions of people have limited access to water, they still think about other people.

  6. Yet another failed attempt ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And here we go with yet another example of politicians and other assholes with no technical understanding deciding to legislate "solutions" for their needs without the barest understanding of reality.

    Yet another country who has decided their need to spy magically changes how technology works.

    And, as usual, this will never work in practice.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Yet another failed attempt ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it amusing that people must store the plaintext copies for 90 days (requiring 2x the storage) instead of merely the key to decrypt the encrypted message.

    2. Re:Yet another failed attempt ... by DigiShaman · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about?! You can bet your ass that the Obama administration and India will develop a coalition of nations to agree on this as treaty binding. This will force Apple and Google and the rest of the software industry to create back-door government APIs into the OS and applications. COUNT ON IT!!!!!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Yet another failed attempt ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would Obummer need that? Executive Orders are plenty enough combined with a Congress willing to rubberstamp any and all surveillance.

    4. Re:Yet another failed attempt ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have the key when you use asymmetric encryption. You could ofcourse also encrypt with your own public key, but there is no requirement to have a keypair yourself to encrypt stuff.

    5. Re:Yet another failed attempt ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're under the mistaken impression that this legislation has anything to do with encryption, technology, or is in any way designed to solve a problem for the public.

      Short, un-pc but painfully true answer: India is an apartheid state run by privileged class. (Cue shill posters in 3..2..1.. Sorry. India's been like this for 5-10x longer than most other countries have flown their flags period. Its not changing any time soon.)

      They've got two goals: 1. Make sure that the lower classes stay impoverished by limiting their access to private communications. 2. Have a bludgeon that, through selective enforcement, they can use to help keep lower classes impoverished.

      Welcome to geopolitics 101. Try not to stay too long or you'll end up hating humanity.

    6. Re:Yet another failed attempt ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He simply said it won't work, not that it wouldn't weaken the utility of Google/Apple software. It won't work, in the sense that if someone cares about being detected, they will simply elect to use uncompromised software which is beyond all industry's reach.

      It won't be a useful move for fighting crooks, terrorists, etc. It'll just help crooks since most people-who-don't-care will have backdoors making them easier to exploit.

    7. Re:Yet another failed attempt ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another country who has decided their need to spy magically changes how technology works.

      More like the need of the local political elites of catching the corruption whistle blowers.

    8. Re:Yet another failed attempt ... by aminorex · · Score: 1

      What do you expect from a country run by Tata consultants?

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  7. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's worrying about draft encryption ? ...

    1. Re:hmm by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      In case of war, your encryption will be drafted.

    2. Re:hmm by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      too late for me, I already burned my rot13 card.

      try getting THAT data back, suckers!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  8. No Exceptionalism For You! by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

    It's this kind of foolishness which means that countries like India and China will never advance into the first rank of nations. It is part of a pattern of meddling, obstructiveness, distrust and plain lack of freedom that causes backwardness. I chuckle whenever a pundit proclaims that India is the future.

    I hasten to add that American politicians, regulators and the general public now seem intent on thrusting the US backwards, by the same means. America will never be overtaken, but it may fall by the wayside.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    1. Re:No Exceptionalism For You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on what means by the first rank of nations.

      Richest? Oman, Saudi Arabia and the U. A. E. are top tier there, so they can be considered part the first rank in that aspect.

      Best conditions for its people? Scandinavian countries and Switzerland will always be tops there, due to the size and heterogeneous population.

      Best for research and scientific progress? China, India, Iran, Germany, France, Canada, Russia, and the US are there, since progress isn't tied to freedom. At the risk of invoking Godwin's law, 1930s Germany had much progress in the sciences.

      Best for military applications? Israel, the US, China, Russia, even Daesh (with their unstoppable propaganda department) count there.

    2. Re:No Exceptionalism For You! by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      You forget about the BS America has pushed in it's past? Clipper chip? PGP fight? 40-bit export encryption.

    3. Re:No Exceptionalism For You! by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      You did not bother to read my second paragraph??

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    4. Re:No Exceptionalism For You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't read your second paragraph either, until you suggested that GP read it. The first one is so indicative of a troll or a xenophobe that one doesn't expect anything useful from the second.

  9. Re:You certainly know the content of this message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot to point out what exactly is for cows this time... India? Encryption?

  10. reactions by DriveDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This'll just drive the use of steganography, and then the government won't even know when there ARE messages.

    1. Re:reactions by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 4, Funny

      Agent 1: Wow, this guy sure likes sending photos of kittens.
      Agent 2: Oh, look how cute this one is!

    2. Re:reactions by swb · · Score: 1

      What is the state of steganography these days?

      Hiding in plain sight seems to be a pretty good technique in the physical world and in the computer world it would seem to be a terrific to combine with encryption to make the encrypted data hard to identify.

      Especially in today's world where people are constantly sharing images, videos, etc.

      I'm also curious about using steganography in transport protocols -- steganographic data or parameters in HTTP/S requests and responses that would otherwise decode as meaningful, but contain hidden encrypted information.

    3. Re:reactions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Devil's advocate: Stego is easily detected.

      As a government autocrat, if I pushed out a few laws, I can put the kibosh on stego:

      1: A rule mandating all computers run a government owned program similar to antivirus, except searches for programs prohibited by law.

      2: Have #1 in hardware and "robust against tampering". This does work. The latest gen of consoles have not been cracked, satellite isn't pirated, it took a $20,000 bounty to just get root on a flagship smartphone, much less a bootloader break, and even PC piracy has been stopped by things like Valve's Anti Cheat which detect being run in a VM or other items and kill the account.

      3: Have the machine's Internet access disabled if it doesn't pass an anti-tamper test. Basically how Microsoft bans re-chipped consoles from XBL.

      4: Scan for any stego programs on machines, or require all executables to be signed.

      None of this will make it 100%, but it will mean that it is easier to watch the few people who have the technology or the smarts to do it. From there, it is trivial to update the "anti-whatever" program mandated to look for anything, be it pictures, web sites (blocking sites on routers and client computers), or anything.

      It is only a time before this happens.

    4. Re:reactions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Far from an expert here, but I would imagine the "accept" field could take additional data without causing any problem for normal traffic.

    5. Re:reactions by theendlessnow · · Score: 2

      Agent 1: Wow, this guy sure likes sending photos of kittens. Agent 2: Oh, look how cute this one is!

      Wonder why the second picture file is named operation_curry_storm.jpg?

    6. Re:reactions by zlives · · Score: 1

      LOL, however google search did not reveal anything..

  11. Contradictory.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why have this

    The policy also specifies that only the government of India shall define the algorithms and key sizes for encryption in India.

    When they have enforced key escrow and mandated plaintext retention of said encrypted data?

    1. Re:Contradictory.. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Why have [key size and algorithm limitations] When they have enforced key escrow and mandated plaintext retention of said encrypted data?

      1) So they can eavesdrop without warning the target.
      2) So they can (try to) crack the saved info when somebody says the dog ate his retained data.
      3) So they can have evidence to bust people who don't provide "retained data" that matches what was sent.
      4) The two sets of requirements are belt-and-suspenders. The retention/delivery requirements help cover for times the wiretap decryption fails or the data is lost through some mishandling, equipment failure, or failure to get the wiretap started in time to capture what was of interest to law enforcement.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  12. Doesn't make sense by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I'm accessing an https website in India that would mean that I would have to copy everything I typed in and save it for 90 days. That's every web search, amazon review, etc.

    1. Re:Doesn't make sense by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not to mention all of your spam e-mails that you looked at via HTTPS webmail. Because if you don't keep an unencrypted copy of "herbal viagra for sale by nigerian princes whose daughters want to video chat with you" for 90 days then you're breaking the law!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re: Doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The exploits already do all the work for you. No need citizen. If that don't work surely those back doors will catch the rest. We are here to protect you citizen. Please disperse now.

    3. Re:Doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammar NSA: "spies", not "spys"!

    4. Re:Doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, missed the parent post "Reply to This" link, repeating below :)

    5. Re:Doesn't make sense by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      If I'm accessing an https website in India that would mean that I would have to copy everything I typed in and save it for 90 days.

      And the other end would have to save all your form data in plaintext for 90 days, too. (I presume you mean "If I'm in India, accessing a https website" and not what you actually said; if you're not in India, or an Indian citizen, you're not bound by these laws.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, Microsoft or Apple do make a backup of all your communication and they don't even have any silly 90d limits for data lifetime..

  13. Algorythms and Key Sizes but... by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I see nothing about the number of iterations. There are going to be an awful lot of pissed off spys when they find that decrypting a messages gives them another encrypted message

    1. Re:Algorythms and Key Sizes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've already fooled them with my ROT26!

    2. Re:Algorythms and Key Sizes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would upgrade to Quintuple-DES if I were you (it's 5 times the protection)...

    3. Re:Algorythms and Key Sizes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammar NSA: "spies", not "spys".

  14. Re:You certainly know the content of this message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't Hindu Indians that believe in reincarnation be happy to be cows? Since cows in India are sacred and all.

  15. Outsourcing to India? by Gaygirlie · · Score: 2

    I wonder how this'll affect the companies that outsource stuff over to India and how badly this screw over their customers. I mean, I would imagine many of these outsourced services will need access to customer records and stuff from the company that hired them, but if the government insists on downgrading encryption and stuff it'll make it much easier for attackers to gain unauthorized access or for them to eavesdrop on stuff.

    1. Re:Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it sounds like somebody in the government over there isn't really thinking this through.

    2. Re:Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you tell they outsourced to India? As far as you know, the company you work with is based in UK, or USA or some other part of the world ...

    3. Re:Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody cares, as long as the service price is low and corporate management will continue to get their bonuses for all the saved money. If the corporations are willing to give access to all their data to cheapest possible people, the Indian government is their smallest problem anyway.

    4. Re:Outsourcing to India? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      anyone outsourcing to india or china already has shown their hand:

      1) they care nothing about quality and are there ENTIRELY because of low-cost labor

      2) they care nothing about security; they never did. its only about #1

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  16. Valid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I need is encryption that makes my encrypted data look like plain text, pdf reports, etc.

  17. The sound of tech businesses leaving India.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hear that? That's the sound of technology companies closing up their offices in India and Indian businesses looking to move to another country.

    Supply working copies of the encryption hardware and software along with full professional documentation? Yeah, sure. Buh bye.

    1. Re:The sound of tech businesses leaving India.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they haven't left the US over Prism why would they leave over this? Tech companies will simply get on their knees and fellate the government's cock like good like lapdogs.

      Or are you under the delusion that tech companies care about you over their profits?

  18. Re:You certainly know the content of this message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  19. Re:You certainly know the content of this message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you know cows are worshipped in India?

  20. i worry more about by dwpbike · · Score: 0

    texas than i do about india

  21. As usual by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    It will be ineffective and it will be wielded against people who haven't even abused the law.

    What's interesting about this proposal is that it actually includes a proviso that makes some sense. They want you to retain the unencrypted copy so that they can sniff through it, but shockingly, they don't want you to retain it forever. That seems like an admission that there are some secrets which should be protected by cryptography.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:As usual by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      The problem, though, that even the 90 day limit is too much to require. Suppose you go to check your Gmail account. You've accessed it via HTTPS which means it's encrypted which means you now need to keep unencrypted versions of all of your e-mails for 90 days. Yes, even that Nigerian prince e-mail that you immediately went to delete as spam. First, you must save it without encryption and only then can you delete it. This will either a) make using any form of encryption too much of a hassle thus leaving communications open for "security agencies" to look through or b) will result in mass violation of the law which means anyone who runs afoul of the wrong official can be jailed for failing to keep unencrypted copies.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re: As usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we have to save the malware riddled attachment too?

  22. These backwards countries... by Jawnn · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...always trying to invade the privacy of their citizens. I'm just thankful that I Iive in the U.S.A. where that kind of thing... Oh, wait...

  23. What happens in this scenario? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's say for example you have some data you want encrypted from point A to point B. You're not using a tunnel/VPN because the thought police is going to break down your door.

    Encrypt the data with asymmetric crypto, and then encrypt the encrypted payload with whatever broken, master keyed encryption they want you to use. They can break their weak mandatory encryption and just see some high entropy garbage that might or might not be encrypted data. You're technically following the rules.

    Will they start taking a very hard look at the person using any data format they can't identify without cryptanalysis? Maybe go the China Firewall route and make using encryption slow and disconnect prone, if not outright blocked?

    I assume you can get away with this for low amount of data.

  24. Sending pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "are required to store the plaintexts of the corresponding encrypted information for 90 days"
    So if I send a encrypted picture I must store it in plaintext? Do I convert the unencrypted pictures bytes to Unicode-text/ASCII?

  25. Indian Draft Encryption? That Sounds Dumb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How are the cricket teams going to know which young cricket players are available if the draft is encrypted?

  26. Re:You certainly know the content of this message by PPH · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Steganography in cow pictures?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  27. So send an email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are inviting comments. Presumably, they want comments from citizens, but my email address doesn't proclaim me to be a non-citizen.

    To: akrishnan@deity.gov.in

    "Such plain text information shall be stored by the user/organisation/agency for 90 days from the date of transaction and made available to Law Enforcement Agencies"

    I suppose that the next proposition will be that people must save their mail, notes, and memos for ninety days, so that the police may look at them.

    Government has NO RIGHT to mandate what encryption methods a private citizen may or may not use. Nor does it have any right to mandate how or when a private citizen disposes of unwanted messages.

    Arrogant, pompous fools in politics presume to pass meaningless laws. Are you competing with the United States, United Kingdom, and Russia to see who can create the most fascist government?

    1. Re:So send an email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Governments have no rights. . They only have power and authority and chains of obedience.

    2. Re:So send an email by zlives · · Score: 1

      India is a democracy, government has all the rights the people give it.

    3. Re:So send an email by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      No. Democracies with no constitutional restrictions on government presume to possess all possible powers, limited only by The People getting outraged over something and demanding revokation.

      The People haven't given them a damned thing -- those in power just took it.

      A proper government is formed by granting a list of powers to it, "and none others".

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:So send an email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India is a democracy,

      This as a long held belief and one of my pet peeves. India is not a democracy. Never was. Never will be.Caste system? Encryption banning? Come on!

    5. Re:So send an email by zlives · · Score: 1

      so you are not arguing if its a democracy.. just not one you consider proper... again power is still with the people, what they choose to do with it... then again encryption is not really on the radar for most indians and much more immediate quality of life issues probably are... not much traction on those either. so ... lets just blame the culture :)

  28. Aka, The "China, Please Snarf My Data" Bill by cmholm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, the Indian Govt thinks that intentionally weak crypto and forced plain text long term storage is a good idea? Never mind what the US might do with this. India's strategic and economic competitor is China, which will thus get so much more info product with so much less effort.

    On the flip side, this may be so unacceptable to the business sector that it'll become another source of graft for officials to look the other way. Aka, The "Bureaucrat Bonus" Bill. Something for everyone.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  29. Hey India! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AyòíÄí{ßpÄê$hGÿ2UÒvï;KÔôöõhÇoQ

  30. Re:You certainly know the content of this message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You misspelled "cat".

  31. A fair bit better than what we deal with.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... with the NSA.

    Calling this worrying means worrying for who? those who have been spying on us illegally/

  32. Fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Government has NO RIGHT to mandate what encryption methods a private citizen may or may not use. Nor does it have any right to mandate how or when a private citizen disposes of unwanted messages.

  33. Government to industry: Empy wallet by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 1

    Stopping a law like this is probably expensive to some major industrialist out there. A fair few Crores Rs I would wager :)

  34. Any DRM exceptions? by Sloppy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Waitaminute. If an Indian watches a DRMed movie, he'll be required by law to have cracked it and ripped it? If I sell DRMed media to Indians, am I going to automatically be a conspirator, if my customer doesn't crack it?

    There needs to be a DRM exception.

    And I'd rather not discuss the consequences of such an exception. ;-)

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Any DRM exceptions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feature, not bug.

      The purpose of regulation in some contexts is to criminalize all behavior to gain leverage. Do what we say or we'll prosecute you for your illegal behavior. It means a breakdown in the rule of law, and the creation of a tyrannical government.

  35. Ministry of Funny Slashdot Subjects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > India's Worrying Draft Encryption Policy

    This sentence means India wants to protect data on the selectively enforced mandatory military service of its citizens, which is a highly laudable aim!

    Draft: a form of conscription, where not every male reaching the military age are pressed into mandatory armed service, but only those unlucky ones who "win" the associated lottery draw. Such a policy may be warranted by the large population of various countries, which have relatively short defence-worthy border lines, eg. India is almost entirely surrounded by oceans and extremely tall mountains on the borders, while USA is entirely bordered by oceans and underdogs.

  36. At least the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    has the common courtesy to build secret backdoors into the encryption and automatically archive all your messages for you ;)

    India is just trying to make their citizens do all the busy work for them.

  37. No mention of terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's not even a passing mention of why this is being done, like um .. protecting from teh badd guyzz

    This hilariously blatant, technologically stupid and never going to work. ... goes and gets some popcorn.

  38. Strange Decision by heretic108 · · Score: 1

    It would appear that India is choosing to squander its immense talent pool, and forego its future as a major world IT player. (Or, as others have pointed out, it's covertly encouraging a new boom in steganography technology.)

    --
    -- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
  39. obscure languages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does a message in obscure language count as encrypted?
    Will it create new work places for translators?

  40. Hoax or incompetence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Symmetric Cryptographic Encryption products with AES, Triple DES and RC4 encryption algorithms and key sizes up to 256 bits are prescribed by the Government for use for protecting information by stakeholders."

    RFC 7465 *prohibits* the continued use of RC4. "RC4 has long been known to have a variety of cryptographic weaknesses."

    AES was re-named by a USA government agency. If I were wanting to keep my data secret from such agencies, I'd be investigating alternatives. Omitting Camellia, Twofish, Serpent, Blowfish, IDEA and taking RC4 over all of them just should remind us all how legislatures ought to keep their opinions out of things they don't understand.

  41. Tell Narenra Modi regime to fuck off by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Tell Narenra Modi regime to fuck off https://www.change.org/p/prime...