Slashdot Mirror


Russia's Plan To Crack Tor Crumbles

mspohr writes: It looks like Russia's effort to crack Tor was harder than they anticipated. The company that won the contract is now trying to get out of it. Bloomberg reports: "The Kremlin was willing to pay 3.9 million rubles ($59,000) to anyone able to crack Tor, a popular tool for communicating anonymously over the Internet. Now the company that won the government contract expects to spend more than twice that amount to abandon the project. The Central Research Institute of Economics, Informatics, and Control Systems—a Moscow arm of Rostec, a state-run maker of helicopters, weapons, and other military and industrial equipment—agreed to pay 10 million rubles ($150,000) to hire a law firm tasked with negotiating a way out of the deal, according to a database of state-purchase disclosures. Lawyers from Pleshakov, Ushkalov and Partners will work with Russian officials on putting an end to the Tor research project, along with several classified contracts, the government documents say."

122 comments

  1. Obfreakingligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, Tor cracks you!

    1. Re:Obfreakingligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm pretty sure the only reason the "editors" accepted this story was for the ISR joke.

    2. Re:Obfreakingligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one historically cromulent joke!

    3. Re: Obfreakingligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if they are saying they could not break it, then they most likely did and are now trying to maximize ROI.

    4. Re:Obfreakingligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't write. Stop it.

  2. too hard or too cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds more like the problem was related to Russia only offering 60k for the effort.

    1. Re:too hard or too cheap? by Bengie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But some fool was stupid enough to take the contract and not be able to deliver.

    2. Re:too hard or too cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The definition of fool I think can be adjusted to now read 'someone foolish enough to endeavor to break Tor for $59k from the Russian government'. Fuck, I'd need at least 20 mil to get me to think about trying, and then fighting off the heat from every organized crime and 'intelligence community' ring for the rest of my life.

    3. Re:too hard or too cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's who gave them the 150k to hire lawyers to get out of the contract... :) (Organized Crime countered with more money to drop the project)

    4. Re:too hard or too cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe that's who gave them the 150k to hire lawyers to get out of the contract... :) (Organized Crime countered with more money to drop the project)

      Reminds me of a joke:
      Guy#1: Help! I lost my wallet with $300, all my credit cards and ID in it. I will give $100 to anyone who finds it and gives it to me.
      Guy#2: I'll give $200! ...

    5. Re:too hard or too cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      trying to get out of the deal because they got a better offer from the americans.

    6. Re:too hard or too cheap? by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      not being able to deliver and taking money is the norm in Russia's business post USSR, so there's nothing new there.

      seriously... it's one of the reasons the economy over there is so small compared to population.. and why people are still growing potatoes in the backyards out of absolute 100% necessity.

      it's also why finland has had to build their fucking water treatment plants for them to keep their (literal) shit out of the gulf of finland.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:too hard or too cheap? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re Cheap or Easy?
      The GCHQ showed the easy way with its Temproa system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      The UK also put a lot of funding into signals intelligence modernisation programme (SIGMOD) over the past years too.
      That allows the UK to reconcile all types of data created in the UK and sent with in the UK and other interesting communications magic.
      Onion routing is then just another data set to match origin to destination on a gov or mil database every day.
      Does Russia face the same network issues? Russia faces constant pressure from NATO backed, created and funded NGO and many well funded Western backed color revolution groups. Rather easy to find using classical police methods given huge funding and low public support numbers.
      US and UK spy networks may test any Russian walk in offer with "internet" contact then if viable offer very advanced sat or low power wireless technology that is not internet based. Safe houses, sites for low power re transmission of data.
      Russia fully understands what it faces politically and from a Western spy perspective. How safe is Onion routing from any well funded gov? As safe as it is from US federal police efforts as seen in open US courts. Onion routing is now within the normal budgets of any well funded federal police support unit globally.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    8. Re:too hard or too cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >why people are still growing potatoes in the backyards out of absolute 100% necessity.

      They are growing potatoes to get absolute 100% vodka.

    9. Re:too hard or too cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia faces constant pressure from NATO backed, created and funded NGO and many well funded Western backed color revolution groups.

      Bullshit. Russia's problems are completely home-grown and are due to the lack of mental capacity of its Communist-bread ruling class to operate a modern state.

      Russia's government faces constant pressure from the members of the Lake Cooperative to squeeze more money for them to steal. I'll remind you only of the Ruble dip in the end of 2014, which turned out to be entirely due to Sechin's (Lake Cooperative member and boss of the state-owned Rosneft) mismanagement of Rosnyeft's debt burden. And of Peskov's $700k watch.

      In the same line for handouts are then people like Kadyrov, Lukashenka and other Russian regions and former SU states who are the best friends Putin has... Until Putin's paying.

      Then come the members of Putin's central and local governments - the real 'Shapito show', starring the merriest clown Mr. Bumblebee (aka Shmele, aka Dmitri Medvedev, aka NeDimon).

      Then come various clowns from the Parliament (from Putin's sex toy Kabaeva, to Zhirik, to Valuev), the media (small and stinky pieces of shit like 'radioactive dust' Kiselyev, 'intrPutinoduce yourself scum' Solovyev), the 'artistic class' - Kobzon, Pugacheva, Putin's bikers and so on.

      NATO doesn't create, backup or fund NGOs, they only encircle Russia with bases and try to have it surrender its natural resources, no? The NGOs are CIA, no?

      Man, you Russkie trolls are just worthless. I heard they even got you out of Savushkina 55 now because you make other tenants look bad.

      Oh, and why did Putin down that plane?

    10. Re:too hard or too cheap? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      They are growing potatoes to get absolute 100% vodka.

      not really. proper vodka is made from grain. near the fall of the ussr and post that they learnt to get by when stores were empty and pensions would only get you a loaf of bread. so they grew whatever to get by.

      however, northern european(Finnish) moonshine was/is made from potatoes quite often and one of the reasons potatoes spread fast at one point...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    11. Re:too hard or too cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds more like the problem was related to Russia only offering 60k for the effort.

      The low price certainly has a lot to do with the fact that the ruble lost half its value against the dollar in one year. 120K still isn't much, but for Russian standards it's a much better proposition.

    12. Re:too hard or too cheap? by Nephrite · · Score: 2

      Pretty please don't base your posts on BBC broadcasts, I nearly split my sides reading your bullshit.

    13. Re: too hard or too cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What should he do? Get his news straight from
      Russian media? Nahhh that isn't bullshit. It's straight from the horses mouth. Right? Right? No lies and deceit there. Gtfoh. Everyone has an agenda.

  3. why don't they just pretend they cracked it? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Why not pretend they cracked it? For an oppressive government (read for any government) FUD is easily as important as reality, so why not pretend they cracked the system?

    As to the company in question, they could easily set up fake 'tests' to show that they have some positive result, that wouldn't be that difficult. Putin is losing his iron fisted grip on his dick.

    1. Re:why don't they just pretend they cracked it? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Why not pretend they cracked it?

      More to the point, why not pretend they didn't crack it, so they could snoop at will with none of the users knowing about the ongoing breach?

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    2. Re:why don't they just pretend they cracked it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Russians are not dumb. In fact, a lot of major software advances are coming from there. They have a lot of experts who can step in, verify if TOR is cracked or not and set the "pants on fire" flag if need be. Russians tend to be less tolerant of up-front liars (especially for things like this) than US government interests.

      I know you don't like Russia (nor any government which provides things like "roads", "power", "fire/police/EMS", or any service that one doesn't pay for out of one's own pocket), but Putin has only ascended in power, and is definitely not a fool or a moron. He took a broken down country with no food on the shelves, and put it back on the map as a world's superpower, and the second most immigrated to country in the world next to the US.

      While our CIC is struggling to keep the government from shutting down (and the military has been gutted due to the sequester), Putin now has a solid power base in the Middle East while the rest of Europe is dealing with a humanitarian crisis not seen since WWII. He only has to sit tight and let Daesh and internal strife weaken his enemies while he slowly, but surely gains ground. He doesn't even need Pravda... many people will spew anti-US propaganda for him now.

      Don't underestimate him, nor Russia. If a Russian firm can't crack TOR, they can't crack TOR, and unlike the US where they just go bankrupt and reform as another firm the next day, the Russian government is going to hold them to task, both civilly and criminally.

    3. Re:why don't they just pretend they cracked it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holly shit you are a dumb fuck. I hope for your sake you are paid to be this... whatever it is.
      roman_mir

    4. Re:why don't they just pretend they cracked it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dear Mr. AC,

      Putin pays trolls like these to promote anti-western comments.

      Source: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/02/putin-kremlin-inside-russian-troll-house

    5. Re:why don't they just pretend they cracked it? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Well, the US claimed they couldn't crack TOR 2 years ago. Another deception flagging the moment they actually could?

      So many possibilities in this forked fishbone analysis!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    6. Re:why don't they just pretend they cracked it? by fisted · · Score: 1

      government [...] provid[ing] service[s] that one doesn't pay for out of one's own pocket

      Hahahahaha. Oh, wow.

    7. Re:why don't they just pretend they cracked it? by esonik · · Score: 2

      Yes, bad news. That's an almost sure sign that they did actually crack it.

      Probably by running a sufficient number of nodes themselves.

    8. Re:why don't they just pretend they cracked it? by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Russians are not dumb. In fact, a lot of major software advances are coming from here.

      FTFY

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    9. Re:why don't they just pretend they cracked it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they don't, and if they do may god stri

  4. Awwww! by sehlat · · Score: 0

    The poor widdle tywanny can't cwack a widdle cipher. My heart bleeds.

    1. Re:Awwww! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the US government hasn't stopped trying to crack Tor.

    2. Re:Awwww! by bancho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The American government pays better.

    3. Re:Awwww! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So good you ate all the propaganda BS.

      Here is a protip: Ask a mathematician where the best mathematicians come from.

    4. Re:Awwww! by Coren22 · · Score: 1
      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    5. Re:Awwww! by Coren22 · · Score: 0

      Kowalski, until you answer the questions, I won't respond to your trolling. I thoroughly spanked you, and you have to resort to shit posting everything I write because you couldn't win against my irrefutable points. Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file, that's because you SHOULDN'T DO IT. No go draw your diagrams of your next project.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    6. Re:Awwww! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coren22 you trolled apk first and he ended up making you eat your words there hypocrite http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    7. Re:Awwww! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APK is so fucking pathetic he has to post as AC to defend his stupid positions.

    8. Re:Awwww! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, I concur.Privilege escalation is the issue and the system is based on trust but there are some interesting ideas there if APK can get past the criticism and find a way around the things you have mentioned.

    9. Re:Awwww! by KGIII · · Score: 2

      I suspect you mean, where do they go? Where they come from, normally, is a fine higher learning institution. I, myself, attended such an institute and was exposed to many brilliant people. A number of mathematicians remain in academia, some go into the private sector, and some of the best work in the government (which is what I expect you were looking for). However, I've no numbers for this, but I can assure you that there are a great many remaining in the other sectors - many of whom are quite capable.

      Seeing as you asked, or insinuated that one should, I figure you may as well get an answer from someone who is actually a mathematician. I suspect you're attempting to claim that the best mathematicians go to work in the government. This is not entirely true. I, personally, ended up modeling traffic and working for the government (contractually) much of the time. My company, however, was privately owned and did not work exclusively with a single government and also expanded into pedestrian traffic models.

      Also, I am nearly done with my vacation/wanderlust. Not that is important but I felt it was something worth adding.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    10. Re:Awwww! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do nothing tools criticize apk yet he built a good app and you have zero to show by comparison to it. He easily he rips you apart as he did Coren22's hypocritical bs here http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... every single time you troll him first as Coren22 the troll did.

    11. Re:Awwww! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coren22 you took it up the ass from apk for your stupid hypocrisy after trolling him first http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    12. Re: Awwww! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trolls crying because he got trolled. Give me a break apk. All of the people on slashdot cannot be wrong. Maybe it is you(APK) that is wrong. I bet you never thought about that have you? No you haven't because mommy told you herself that you are a special guy and the smartest person in the family.

      Your arrogance blinds you. That is why no one uses your product on slashdot. Yet you keep spamming it.

    13. Re: Awwww! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fail: /. users and millions worldwide do http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

  5. Ask the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should ask the NSA? Tor is not secure, this is a fact. Tor is a great tool for idiots to think they are covering their tracks. Actual nefarious things on the internet are not done through TOR.

    Onion routing has failed.

    1. Re:Ask the NSA by mlw4428 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's only failed because the NSA has taken over many of the end-points. Onion routing itself is not "broken" nor has it "failed". There are plenty areas of it that are very secure and very difficult to break. Some of the high profile cases were because of stupid mistakes that the site owners did (mixing email accounts/user IDs/other identifying information with external sources).

    2. Re:Ask the NSA by jandrese · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Attacks on TOR invariably work through good old social engineering or browser hacks. I have yet to see an article where someone was successfully tracked through TOR itself instead of some out of band attack. TOR itself isn't the problem, it's the users.

      TOR can't help you if you run some random executable that some random guy on the drug trading message board asked you to run. Believe it or not, this is apparently a very common way for the FBI to catch TOR users, simply asking them to run a Trojan.

      TOR hasn't failed, but it is not a magic bullet either. It is but one piece of a security system.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:Ask the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      None of the stories about how the feds busted the silk road guy add up. It's already demonstrated that the whole "I connected to the server and it gave me a public ip" story was bullshit: the server configuration had been entered into evidence and people reconstructed the server and discovered that it did not, in fact, serve up a captcha with the real IP (in fact, due to a server misconfiguration, it would serve a mysql admin page.) Or the one about the guy having a box of fake IDs mailed to himself from Canada that just so happened to be opened by customs?

      The fact is, TORs developers openly admit that it is not secure against PRISM-level attacks that observe every packet on the internet. They cannot see what is in your packet, but they absolutely can see that your packet is sent to tor node A and 0.5ms later, a packet of the same size is sent to tor node B, which sends a packet of the same size to tor node C, and so on until it gets to the silk road or kiddieporn-r-us, or whatever. Then they can see the packets coming back the same route. This is all metadata. And to figure out where the silk road server is? Easy: they connect to it themselves and track their own packets.

    4. Re:Ask the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I have yet to see an article where someone was successfully tracked through TOR itself instead of some out of band attack

      Parallel construction.

      It's unconstitutional to use NSA's tactics to bust people, so instead of admitting to using unconstitutional techniques, the government figures out a way to "accidentally" find the same information in a legal way.

      You're not going to find an article where the government is admitting to it, but it's happening all the same

    5. Re:Ask the NSA by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If it were feasible for the NSA to take over enough exit nodes to own the network in a way that wouldn't be noticed, why didn't this company simply suggest the same thing. Tell the government that the crack is you spend some tens of millions on servers, spread them around the world and collate all the data.

      Running a very large number of exit nodes is not a practical attack.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Ask the NSA by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      This is why you need something like the old Freenet, except of course it's almost unworkable for normal users because of the crap that ends up on such a system, and the fact that it is only internal, so not much use for obscuring you connecting to internet sites, oh and it's slow as hell.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  6. That's a shame... by TrimTabTim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The cat and mouse game between black-hats and FOSS developers in the end usually just makes the code better. When I read the original article back in Feb, I kind of thought it would be cool if they found a few Tor vuln's to fix, even if they exploited them for a while before the public discovered them.

    But now Putin and his cronies are probably just going to get more aggressive with their anti-encryption stances, if that's even possible. It's all gonna backfire on them one day.

    1. Re:That's a shame... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      When I read the original article back in Feb, I kind of thought it would be cool if they found a few Tor vuln's to fix,

      Maybe they did.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  7. Are we forgetting some zeroes in this article? by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Are we forgetting some zeroes in this article? If it was so easy to break Tor that $59,000 would get the job done, I imagine that it would already be widely known how to crack it. That's less than the price of hiring a single coder for a year.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Are we forgetting some zeroes in this article? by Nutria · · Score: 1

      If it was so easy to break Tor that $59,000 would get the job done

      That much money in Elbonia buys a lot more than $59,000 in the US...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:Are we forgetting some zeroes in this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same thought, although we're probably both thinking in terms of US costs. I think that the author is confusing a "reward" of $59K to some random person dumb enough to give up a vulnerability for that amount (it would go for much more) compared to a likely untold amount of money being paid to the Russian company to figure it out.

    3. Re:Are we forgetting some zeroes in this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It buys more coders. But, Elbonian coders. Does it really buy more than in the US?

    4. Re: Are we forgetting some zeroes in this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it does, the US also recruits its best coders from Elbonia.

    5. Re:Are we forgetting some zeroes in this article? by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      It buys more coders. But, Elbonian coders. Does it really buy more than in the US?

      Implying the country you live in somehow decides how good of a coder you are.

      Actually in some ways it does. I have no doubts that Russians and Chinese are much better at breaking and cracking software than a USA office zombie.

    6. Re:Are we forgetting some zeroes in this article? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I think they were trying to save some money by being smart. Offer $60k, if no-one takes it start upping the price to see what the lowest bid is.

      Unfortunately for them some idiot decided to take the $60k before realizing that $60bn wouldn't be enough.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Are we forgetting some zeroes in this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The country you live in does not decide how good of a coder you are. However, the education you have access to is much more influential, and that typically has a geopolitical correlation. For one thing, speaking English as a native language will give you an advantage over non-English-speaking coders, because almost all programming languages have English keywords, and almost all documentation is available in English first. Refer to that well-known quote about Linus Torvalds commenting his code in English because it didn't occur to him not to. Heck, read the whole article, JA says it better than I could.

  8. Scope? by s.petry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Large issue not just in Russia, but all Governments. "We want you to do X" becomes a contract to do exactly "X" without anyone questioning what A-W will be required to get to X. Also, is X required or can we get by with W?

    If that seems convoluted, apology and I can try to think of better descriptions.

    Obviously this company agreed to do X. Sounds to me like in Russia you have to actually meet your contractual obligations. Unlike the US which would allow overruns, partial plans, and decades of run around until the project was cancelled. (Nope, I would rather be in the US than the USSR but if we don't admit our own problems we look like idiots complaining about others).

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Scope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like in Russia you have to actually meet your contractual obligations. Unlike the US which would allow overruns, partial plans, and decades of run around until the project was cancelled

      This
      I was just thinking "Where's the abandonment clause in the contract?"
      I also note that it's 10M rubles just to hire the law firm, let alone paying back the 3.9M they got for the job, or any fines.

      On the other hand - it sounds very much like the USA - bosses agree to do X without asking a tech-type if it's even possible.

    2. Re:Scope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except this didn't happen in the USSR. It happened in Russia.

    3. Re:Scope? by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I'm old, you have to cut me some slack. It was the "USSR" for nearly 40 years of my life.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    4. Re: Scope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get back on your lawn, old man.

    5. Re:Scope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... overruns, partial plans, and decades of run around until the project was cancelled.

      The US military makes great case-studies for project managers. Essentially the military has a system-wide goal and works down from that, the goal then changes as people realize what they actually want and turf wars ensue. Such behaviour 'poisons the well' as the contractors face scope creep, road-blocks, increasing imprecision and alienation, which becomes a vicious circle. In short most projects fail because there wasn't a specific, measurable, real, time-limited goal. The US government signs open-ended contracts which help pour more money onto the failure. The contractors in turn bid low, because it's a meaningless promise and encourage buy-in from as many departments as possible.

  9. Smokescreen by qbast · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So they already cracked it and now they are trying to stage very public fiasco in order to convince everybody it is still safe. *dons tinfoil hat*

    1. Re:Smokescreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds more plausible than, "Russia announces it has failed and is incompetent. Putin was quoted as saying, 'Sorry, but we just came up short. Awshucks, we just can't hang with the real hackers. EVERYONE IS SAFE NOW!! Thank you.'"

    2. Re:Smokescreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couple with the comment that claimed $59,000 isn't enough to crack Tor.
      The whole thing was a decoy play. Publicly spread doubt in the security of the Tor system, then make a public statement that Tor remains uncompromised.

      If you trust the government, you trust Tor, but have few if any reasons to use it.
      If you distrust the government, you distrust Tor, but have the most reason to need a secure channel to use.

      End result, Putin wins.

    3. Re:Smokescreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Of course this is the case. It was cracked long before they offered the contract. $60000 is an absurd funding level for a project of national security significance. If it were $60 million, then it would be at least plausible.

      On the other hand, it could also be a double bluff. In that, they were unable to crack it and tried to make it look like they had.

      Ultimately, TOR is of limited use in any nation that monitors traffic. It is just a matter of identifying anyone making a TOR connection, then progressively examining each person. That process can be entirely automated, at least in the US and NATO. It wouldn't take long to have a culled list of probable targets and raise a flag when they were communicating.

      TOR makes people stick out, not blend in.

    4. Re:Smokescreen by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Couple with the comment that claimed $59,000 isn't enough to crack Tor.
      The whole thing was a decoy play. Publicly spread doubt in the security of the Tor system, then make a public statement that Tor remains uncompromised.

      If you trust the government, you trust Tor, but have few if any reasons to use it.
      If you distrust the government, you distrust Tor, but have the most reason to need a secure channel to use.

      End result, Putin wins.

      Possibly, though if I was trying to dodge the US or Iranian government I'd be worried by the fact that Russia thought $60k was enough to crack it.

      If I was Russian I might be more likely to use Tor since this whole thing makes Russia look really incompetent when it comes to trying to handle Tor.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    5. Re:Smokescreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BINGO. If anyone *really* believes Russian SIGINTers do not know ways of demasking TOR users, I have several Brooklyn Bridges on sale for you.

      And if you doubt, just look at Eugene Kaspersky, a former Army Intelligence SIGINTer. He and his company appear to be top notch in the antivirus business.

    6. Re:Smokescreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are arrows which can demask one or all TOR users at a certain point. But the arrow needs to be used judiciously, so we hear little about it.

      Instead they spread the FBI BS about "how we found Silk Road by means of gumshoe work". Parallel Construction in order to protect the NSA Arrow.

    7. Re:Smokescreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does Anti-Virus work? Use that same method to track bits in and out of TOR, case closed.

    8. Re:Smokescreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or maybe that's what they want you to think, and that they didn't crack it and that you're still safe. Oh wait...

  10. knowing Russia... by Kinwolf · · Score: 2

    Knowing the way Russia works, they probably actually cracked it but wants to appear like they didn't. Honestly, who is gonna follow up on that news to see that the negociation to get out of it truly happens? Exactly.

  11. Or! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they cracked it and this is just a misdirection. Very doubtful though. Also, $59k seems like WAY too little to for such value as cracking TOR.

  12. Engaging Tin Foil Shields by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At first I thought "Good it wasn't broken", then I thought "If they were able to break it what would they do .... uh oh!". Its probably just because I saw "The Imitation Game" a few months ago but "Who Really Knows" (TM).

  13. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    59'000$ for something that the NSA (acording to Snowden) could not crack... Really?? Is Putin watching too much russian TV?!

  14. No doubt about it Tor is broken by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For a long time in my mind there's been no doubt that Tor is broken, at least with respect to the powers available to the United States and its allies. Think about it. There are no where near a million Tor nodes and even fewer exit nodes, and a million servers is a rounding error in the DoD black budget for a year.

    Sure, non DoD Tor nodes exist, but what % of them are p0wned? I'll hazard a guess; just that % required to make it statistically implausible that, combined with traffic analysis, context gleaned from exit nodes a handful of zero-days etc. etc. no one can use Tor and expect sustained anonymity from the government.

    I actually think that's a good thing. Hear me out. For the general Tor user who just wants their ISP , nosy Shark Wire aware neighbor, political opponents, large corporations, website owners land various databrokers to fuck off, they have what they want For dissidents in oppressive nations, those nations probably can't muster the resources to de-anonymize Tor users. For very bad people who want to do very bad things, we can get them, with some effort.

    I know this is a minority opinion, but I think that the opposing opinion is regressive. Once, it wasn't possible for a small group of non-nation-state individuals to wreak mayhem on millions of people at once.

    Once, the amount badness that could be achieved by Bad Guys was a trade-off between the number of people the Bad Guys wanted to effect, the number of people the Bad Guys could enlist to help them and the degree of severity of the Badness itself. Not any more. This changes everything.

    We are living more and more in a world in which a few or even one really fucked up person can reach out and kill. This is nothing but the advancement of technology, and it's not going to stop. That means the power of small groups gets larger and broader even as the size of that group spiral down to one.

    How are we going to counter this general phenomena? I agree, that giving any government unchecked, unobservable, unlimited powers is always a bad idea. (Ironcially, I believe this because of the actions members of administrations who profess to want to "get government off our backs" and told us "government isn't the solution, it's the problem"- Oliver North, James Secord, Dick Cheney, Alberto Gonzales etc etc. )

    But in the face of this hypothetical and not-always hypothetical threat we still have the facts on the ground with respect to advancing technologies and the leverage it gives just anyone.

    I don't think the answer is to limit the power of government. We need that power to exist. I think the answer lies in the people being able to hold the government accountable and their actions rendered transparent to a degree that would shock most people today, both in and out of government. We need to radically re-think the national security 3rd-rail issues like national security classifications, clearances, Presidential directives, etc. etc.

    It will tear this country apart if the government continues to do what it knows it needs to do in order to avert terrorism and societal chaos and the people continue to feel like they have no faith in the integrity of the processes and powers of the government- that it could at any moment turn the death ray on them, and probably will. That whole dynamic, the whole world view needs to be addressed and not just addressed but actually resolved by some radical out of the box thinking no one had done yet.

    We can have both security and freedom, but it's not going to just arise naturally by continuing on with the status quo conceptual categories we are using now.

    1. Re:No doubt about it Tor is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are living more and more in a world in which a few or even one really fucked up person can reach out and kill. This is nothing but the advancement of technology, and it's not going to stop. That means the power of small groups gets larger and broader even as the size of that group spiral down to one.

      That has literally always been the case. Now, if you mean that a few or even one can kill in significant quantities (thousands or more), then that's a truer statement that it's a "new" problem.

    2. Re:No doubt about it Tor is broken by gatfirls · · Score: 2

      Would you consider a nation that spies on it's entire population oppressive? Do you never think there will be a time in which our government overreach will land us in another McCarthy era and use this kind of monitoring to have witch hunts?

      In my opinion the inability to securely communicate is as much of a suppression of free speech as direct suppression.

    3. Re:No doubt about it Tor is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most of the folks working on Tor are skilled, conscientious security software programmers.
      Many of the folks who operate the major Tor exit node projects are skilled, conscientious security-focussed sysadmins.

      Remember a few other things:

      * Tor does not protect against an adversary that can snoop enough of the network between you and any of the possible exit nodes to perform traffic analysis. It *never* has, and has *always* made this limitation *very* clear.

      * Someone who records traffic flowing from a Tor exit node learns no more than someone who records traffic flowing through any given part of the Internet. Indeed, if your ISP were to snoop on your regular Internet traffic, they would be able to derive *far* more information from their surveillance than someone snooping an exit node.

      * The US is *not* the only state-level actor with the capability to wiretap large sections of the internet.
      * If Tor's effectiveness is substantially weakened, both law enforcement and intelligence agencies lose a *very* powerful clandestine intelligence-gathering tool. It's counter-productive for the major powers to work to undermine Tor.

    4. Re:No doubt about it Tor is broken by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Would you consider a nation that spies on it's entire population oppressive?

      Yes and that's been covered so many times here and in the media. People have spoken out and things are changing for the better (we hope). They know we are watching them so they'll either more careful or will adjust in favor of the public. What people expect now is transparency at almost all levels of government. It will take time but expect things to change UNLESS people stop caring about these issues.

      In my opinion the inability to securely communicate is as much of a suppression of free speech as direct suppression.

      The first amendment doesn't cover this black and white so it's still left for interpretation in courts. There have been cases where encryption was simply considered FUNCTION and not EXPRESSION.

    5. Re:No doubt about it Tor is broken by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 1
      Yes exactly. Basically this holds true:

      Civil Liberties = number of people it takes to do it / (degree of harm * number of people effected)

      All kinds of violence can be categorized using this

      Examples:

      normal person on person crime:
      Large number of people to do small harm to small number of people (aka , normal life) Civil Liberties not effected (stays around 1)

      war
      large number of people to do large harm to large number of people (aka war) civil liberties might go down (as they do at war time)

      humdrum terrorism
      small number of people to do large harm to small (1000s at most) number of people. Civil liberties start to be noticeably effected. It starts to become structural.

      supercharged terrorism
      small number of people, tending towards one, render high degree of damage (death) to large numbers of people (tens of thousands, millions, everyone...). Civil Liberties severely curtailed , eliminated or redefined by public demand. It's structural and it's permanent.

      We want to do everything we can to never reach the last one. This may involve redefining notions which in the face of scientific progress prove themselves to be outdated and archaic.

    6. Re:No doubt about it Tor is broken by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 1

      OK there's a difference between ability to do something and the actual doing of it. No government organization can contemplate the exchanges between all people, much less all people all the time. But they have the ability to zero in people if they believe it's warranted. That's how it's always worked. That's how it is now. The ability to tap a phone was always there, but not all phones were tapped.

      Now, in a sense, all phones ARE tapped, but they don't have the ability to listen to all that, so they're NOT tapped in the sense of they're listening in. Looked at in this way, the concept of "tapped" has been deconstructed into its constituent parts- recording the fact of the call, and human awareness of what was said , followed by action. "Tap" used to imply both of those things.

      You have the right to not incriminate yourself, as ever. The right to remain silent (in the US, but not really in the UK, which is shocking to Americans). But the police had always had the power to subpoena witnesses, material, phone records etc.

      I am not suggesting anyone take the expansion, ease and ubiquity of these police powers without trepidation. I would like to see more worry about them. In response to that worry I would like to see structural, inspectable safeguards, unassailable and possibly anonymous (to the police) overseers, and severe, crippling life-ruining punishment for anyone, at any position of government who abuses them to any degree or anyone who covers up the same, lies about the same to Congress ever for any reason (Clapper) without exception and anyone who knows about the same, but does not report it to a disconnected, legally unassailable watchdog.

      But as time goes on, we will trend towards wanting greater and greater transparency of all individuals, at will, anywhere and everywhere and at any and all times, both in and out of government.

      That's just where we're being forced by both constructive and destructive advances in technology.

    7. Re:No doubt about it Tor is broken by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I'd say about 1/3 run by the US government... another third by China, and the rest by Russia.

    8. Re:No doubt about it Tor is broken by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >> Do you never think there will be a time in which our government overreach will land us in another McCarthy era and use this kind of monitoring to have witch hunts?

      Yes absolutely. In my mind, there's no doubt that if Cheney at. al. had had the powers we have today when they first started their governmental careers we'd have disappeared political opposition, people framed and ruined, entire departments of government at the end of a short blackmail chain. All in the name of "national security", because their opponents' policies would have endangered us all. Even today, Cheney actually makes this claim in the media against Obama. What do you think he would have done to candidate Obama if he had had the chance? After all, national security.

      One source of hope ()and that's all it is really) that this won't materialize is that the people who come of age with this technology won't abuse it just because they've grown up in a time in which fear of it's abuse was discussed in the larger culture, and they don't want to be The Bad Guy. that is, they've absorbed society's norms and values and won't contradict them.

      If that sounds too optimistic to you, sociopaths like Gonzales, Cheney and Oliver North have a preternatural ability to rise to the top of organizations, then you like me are more interested in structural solutions to the McCarthy problem.

      What are those solutions? We don't know, but they must be brought into existence.

    9. Re: No doubt about it Tor is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STfU. When the govt is no longer corrupt and full of greedy liars, THEN we will 'have what we want'. As for tor. It IS secure. How people themselves use encryption and to which ends they use it is ALL that matters. If you have tyrrant/s who would trounce on your individual freedoms-read privacy faggot is when you will see stories of "it's been owned", or "totally not secure". Again, when individual rights of freedoms and privacies are under attack, ANYFUCKINGTHING goes.

    10. Re:No doubt about it Tor is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are living more and more in a world in which a few or even one really fucked up person can reach out and kill. This is nothing but the advancement of technology, and it's not going to stop. That means the power of small groups gets larger and broader even as the size of that group spiral down to one.

      I have long argued that we are well on the way to a level of technology that will enable a single person to exterminate the entire human race forever. This is not a bad thing, and it cannot be stopped. We just need to create a world where no one person has the motivation to do that.

      When the button for "planet cracker" antimatter weapon is under the finger of a single person, we damn well better make sure that person is happy. It could be any of us.

    11. Re:No doubt about it Tor is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the beauty of it. Tor is almost entirely run by intelligence agencies but there are so many competing agencies out there that it still ends up being statistically secure for the users.

    12. Re:No doubt about it Tor is broken by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      There are some flaws in your theory. For example, if the US is willing to try to gain control of enough of the exit nodes to break Tor, then other countries will too. It will become an arms race to install the most exit nodes. I'm sure China would be in on that game for a start.

      Running a lot of exit nodes would also come to the attention of people who work on Tor pretty quickly. It would require a massive effort to distribute them geographically, and to configure and administer them in a way that obfuscated their ownership. While possible, it's at the the fake-moon-landing level of massive conspiracy. What we have seen of the NSA and GCHQ leaks suggests that they do not have that capability, at least not on that scale.

      In any case, say the NSA has cracked Tor. Okay, what does that mean for people using Tor? For most of them, not much. The NSA would never give away the fact that it can unmask Tor users just to go after some drug dealer, paedophile or mid ranking terrorist. Maybe even Bin Laden would have been considered too low value to use it on, when we know it is in use by governments and other spy agencies.

      We are talking about a theoretical, improbable attack that would likely be detected, and only ever used against extremely high value targets in cases where the information can be explained in other ways or kept super top secret. We know from leaked NSA and GCHQ documents that at least a few years ago, when such an attack would still have been possible, they hadn't done it and were unable to crack Tor, instead relying on the user making mistakes.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  15. $59,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What moron would take a government contract for $59,000? Tor is not safe, but it's not going to fall to an amateur team that takes a contract for $59,000 lol.

  16. Not only that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but the CIA actively funds it, it's the only reason the russians wanted to crack it it - to expose the cia ass arseholes

  17. Meaning nothing by Bugler412 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So either they successfully cracked it and are done and want to look they failed. Or they actually failed to crack it and they want out of the deal. Either way, we know nothing more. This article offers no useful information at all.

    1. Re:Meaning nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      that haven't cracked shit. Tor works like it says it does. The problem is the end points and the fact that GO's are running enough them to de-anonymize traffic flowing over them.

    2. Re:Meaning nothing by KGIII · · Score: 2

      I should have said this further up the thread but, oh well...

      Stop using TOR as a proxy, assholes. (I do not mean you, specifically.) Stop downloading torrents through it, assholes. TOR is fine so long as you remain on the .onion domains - as soon as you go into the clear-net you are subject to monitoring. They can, and will, be able to use traffic shaping and timing to determine who you are and where you are going. It has been like this since the start and will remain like this forever.

      It was not meant to use for browsing the regular web. It sure as shit wasn't meant so that you could go to Facebook. It sure as hell isn't meant for torrents. Use it for browsing .onion sites. That is all.

      You can use it to bypass some filters. That's fine. You'll still be subject to tracking.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  18. No, Jackass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason we have cost overruns is because we're willing to take a risk and follow up on potential solutions.

    Hey, think you could do this thing that looks impossible?
    Well, we'll take a look for $price. ... if it's possible, it's going to take at least $$$$ manhours + materials, and might not work.

    At this point, you can say, I'll give uyou $$ if you succeed, and your bidders will say "fuck you" and walk, Alternatively, you can say, I'll give you $$$ to work on it for a year. Then after a year, you pay them for that first year of work, and then decide whether or not they've made enough progress to continue funding it. Turns out that hard problems are generally hard problems, and that when you, the government, keep changing the fucking objective of the project, well, yeah, it's going to take more time and effort to get to whatever it is you think you want this week.

    The problem is completely the government. Our profit is fixed by schedule, and for things wher eyou don't know what you want, well, we're going to take a percentage of profit because we don't believe you will ever decide what you want.

    1. Re:No, Jackass by s.petry · · Score: 1

      The reason we have cost overruns is because we're willing to take a risk and follow up on potential solutions.

      Ha ha ha, OMFG! oh.. wait.. wait... you haf tah .. HAHAHA!!

      Okay, now that I can breath. You go tell it to an ignorant person who has not worked in the defense arena or served in or near a government office. You have a chance at bullshitting the ignorant.

      As for myself, I'm a veteran of the US Army and worked in the Defense area for a very long time (just not within the last few years). I know the games played on both sides of that fence.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    2. Re:No, Jackass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regarding your comment:

      Turns out that hard problems are generally hard problems, and that when you, the government, keep changing the fucking objective of the project, well, yeah, it's going to take more time and effort to get to whatever it is you think you want this week.

      This isn't just governments, it's businesses all over the world! (And, well government bodies have basically turned their operations/duties into a business structure anyways).

      Entity A creates a list of expectation for Entity B to deliver on, usually with a deadline, regular progress reports, and often no room for Change Orders. HOWEVER, the world as we know it isn't a static playing field. With the world globally connected as it is today, news travels quick. Analytic and statistical data is reported to Entity A, which prompts for either a turn of direction or an expansion of the original set of expectations -> all without proper compensations/accommodations since the "contract" is set in stone. So, not only is Entity B bound by contract to deliver by deadline, it must be done without any extra funding. Depending on how Entity A reacts, any bids for Change Orders or delays might be outlined as a breach of the contract which would put Entity B at risk of a lawsuit because of this. And, well we are talking about Russia here... so the consequences could be much worse.

  19. Shit, shit, shit... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    What are we going to do? The commies have clearly discovered a way to replicate our advanced 'unreliable an underperforming military contractor' technology and are now working on perfecting it! How can freedom survive this onslaught?

  20. Whether TOR is cracked or not.. by mindmaster064 · · Score: 1

    It think the best use of it is hiding your IP from every site, and adding another layer of encryption. If you need message security use a message security encryption, and if you need a file encryption use the right tool. Assuming anything on the Internet isn't clear text at all times is just being foolish -- even if the site you are on uses HTTPS it is possible that they are hacked, etc...

  21. Re:*faaart* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sex Conker got some new material?

  22. Of course if you crack an encryption system by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The first thing you would want to do is convince everyone else that you failed.

    1. Re:Of course if you crack an encryption system by erapert · · Score: 1

      We'll know which depending on what happens to the underpaid crackers.
      If the underpaid crackers are arrested and disappeared then we know they failed.
      If the underpaid crackers are able to finagle their legal way to getting out of the contract yet continue to bring in more government contracts then we know they succeeded and that their "failure" was a lie.

  23. Re:*faaart* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    OMG It's Billy the Kid! Hey Billy!

    Bartender: Hey everyone, Billy the Kid is here
    Billy the Kid: Hee haw! Hee haw! Hee haw!

  24. Russia out of crumbles by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    but apparently they have a lot of crack!
    It's not really my thing, though. I don't want to smoke their crack and find myself wanting it again. If I were Russian I would keep my crumbles, thanks.

  25. OR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They got a call from the NSA saying "Don't fuck with our honeypot."

  26. The solution is SAP by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    The solution is SAP, or course. If they'd just hired SAP for this project they could have wasted all that money up front without the need for a middleman.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  27. I let users increase security & speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject:.. Via hosts & my program that imports data from 10 reputable security community sources for blocking a myriad of threats from online - what have YOU done better, Mr. "wannabe security guru" (that can't prove that much about himself either)?

    You're a PROVEN hypocrite I utterly SPANKED today, using your own stupidity to do it -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    APK

    P.S.=> What's that about using admin priveleges again, Coren22? How many programs do you use that YOU HAD TO USE IT YOURSELF, stupid?? Unbelievable... little troll moron TROLLS ME 1st & is "upset" that I am doing it back now, finally?? Make me laugh some more, you little "ne'er-do-well" technically incompetent little bullshit artist do nothing fool... apk

    1. Re:I let users increase security & speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi APK,

      I'm not posting as my user so you don't troll me - I'm not coren22. I've secured infrastructure to ISO standards and no one takes windows seriously as a secure platform while it has ether net plugged into it.

      I read your post from a third party point of view because I wondered if you had a point and Coren22 is right about the privilege escalation issue - you can't fix a design flaw in windows. It's not your fault but if you take the time to understand what he is talking about instead of attacking him you might realize he is actually helping you improve your offering.

      I'm not criticizing you for trying, because I think it is an interesting approach however I think your should take a step back and see if you can address the arguments raised. Instead of wasting your time attacking people why don't you instead ask them what they would do about it and start thinking like a business person who can offer something no one else has thought about. I think it's interesting, I've read you posts but frankly your trolling is a real blemish on your offering.

      The people here know *alot* about technology and maybe that can benefit you.

    2. Re:I let users increase security & speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coren22 attacked him first. I verified it in the link he posted. What's Coren22 done in computing? Nothing. I am not impressed with do nothings like him that troll.

  28. Freedom Host Canary died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The canary on Tor was Freedom Host, as long as Freedom Host was singing Tor worked well enough, when the silk road was closed (twice, two different versions from two different crooks, second closure looked routine like it was automated!), Tor was gone. If I was a Chinese dissident, or a North Korean one or under a dictator like Assad, I would assume Tor does not work and would not trust it.

    I don't think smaller government has anything to do with it, it was funded by the US government so dissidents could communicate freely, and that was good.

    And it was attacked by other agents of the US Government, and that was right too. That was their job.

    But it turns out those attackers have gone beyond attacking, and actually *subverting* the technology to make their attacks easier, that's the problem right there. These back doors in US tech. Some of them appear deliberate, others a function of the NSA getting zero day notices before the patch arrives. Tor looks backdoored.

  29. Russian people are not Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russian [people] are not dumb. They saw how the election did a sudden turn and Putin snatched victory in impossible voting. The projection of all Russians loving Putin is really a Putin message.

    That $59000 is sooo small, it wouldn't even cover a pre-quote in the West, and that reminds us, that Russia is a tiny bluff economy pumped up with oil money. The oil price is low and Putin is struggling to keep the populace distracted from the economy. Attacking neighbors and sending planes around Syria.

    However that doesn't mean he is capable of much beyond his own country.

    Really I think Europe at this point should re-take Georgia and Ukraine while Putin is pooting around Syria. His military is small and he bravado big.

  30. In Fascist Germany, TOR is broken! by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 2

    There is a lot of Soviet films about the Nazis attempting to catch a Soviet agent by selectively powering down the city blocks.

    The same method is fully applicable to TOR. You just make a connection to TOR node you try to find and then block/delay anything except well known ports for, say, 5 seconds. If your traffic is correspondingly delayed then you have blocked the part of the network which contains either intermediate or end node. And you can do it in parallel for all the known TOR hidden nodes.

    You need a control of all the network but it's quite simple since all the main Internet providers are state monopolies. Also, the infrastructure for doing it is being built due to the internet filtering laws.

    The cloud storage networks seem more promising in these circumstances since it's impossible to find post factum who inserted the info to the cloud.

    1. Re:In Fascist Germany, TOR is broken! by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Very good point, just drop connections, suspected users accounts are logged and see if the traffic stops per user :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  31. low ball much? by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

    $59k isn't very much for what they want. the value of cracking tor should be measured in the millions.

    --
    ...
  32. Re: What a latest technology to crack easily by axlworldstore · · Score: 1

    Technology is going to blow up the world and can not able to save at own. So be prepare for that. No data file will be secure from internet.