Slashdot Mirror
America Runs Out of IPv4 Internet Addresses
FireFury03 writes: The BBC is reporting that the American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) ran out of spare IP addresses yesterday. "Companies in North America should now accelerate their move to the latest version of the net's addressing system. Now Africa is the only region with any significant blocks of the older version 4 internet addresses available." A British networking company that supplies schools has done an analysis on how concerned IT managers should be. This comes almost exactly 3 years after Europe ran out.
Out of IP addresses? Sounds like a good time to invade somewhere where they mine them!
And just when I finally won the internet yesterday.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
Not from American companies, you silly squirrel.
I just looked at my open wireless router, and I think I've got all the IP addresses.
You are welcome on my lawn.
At this point, ISPs need to mandate that customers use SNI where possible; too many IP addresses are allocated just for an SSL certificate. I think we'll start seeing more Let's Encrypt-type Subject Alternate Name management tools, too.
I mean, not nearly yet. It keeps getting closer. But not yet.
Soon, though.
Soon, I am going to have a very fun week.
-- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
So far the day is going smoothly. I am comparing before and after photos but have detected no anomalies thus far.
Having no ipv4 allocations available is like that very first day when the folks pumping gas at the filling station filled your tank but did not clean your windshield or check the oil. There was great deal of anxiety at first, but (thankfully) people kept arriving for gas and the country slowly adjusted to this 'new normal'.
Then gas station attendants disappeared altogether.
No one knows where they've gone.
So if you work in IT, tie a string to yourself so we can follow it if you go poof.
<blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
No thanks. IPv6 addresses are a mouthful, typically 3x as long when printed. We should move to a version that makes them 1 byte longer.
or this wouldn't be such a big deal.
Don't you dare touch my 192.168.0.0/16! I have claims in 169.254.0.0/16, 10.0.0.0/8 and 172.16.0.0/12 too!
You'll have to pry them from my cold dead routers!
Yeah, whatever, man. Slashdot runs this same story every few months, and has been doing so for years. Previous one is from July: North America Runs Out of IPv4 Addresses. The story never mentions that there are actually other pools that still contain a goldmine of addresses. I also suspect that companies own big blocks that can be freed when the going gets tough. So probably we're still good for a long time.
>> America Runs Out of IPv4 Internet Addresses
Again? ...
http://arstechnica.com/informa...
http://www.zdnet.com/article/n...
Bring on the rush of IPv4 squatters now...
seems like we see one of these every few months. maybe its true, but its hardly a problem we cant as americans drag our feet on. There are numerous practical reasons we have poor ipv6 penetration. not the least of which are:
understanding: greybeards and young guns alike in IT share an almost religious fear of IPv6 sometimes. Its a poltergeist most companies would care to avoid as well, as it would require hiring people who understand ipv6 as well as 4. not just the address, but how to route it, how to firewall it, and how to handle its DNS addressing. unless youre a firmly bunkered BOFH, youll have gaps in your understanding.
infrastructure: ipv6 has been in place at comcast and time warner for a while, but it requires DOCSIS 3 capable modems to handle the traffic and ipv6 capable wireless ap's in many cases. most americans who dont bask in the warm green glow of slashdot havent rushed out to buy a new modem when their current one is just as good. most cable companies were loathe to provide a free or subsidized upgrade (thats probably changed now that theyre common-carrier status) but it doesnt change the meat of the problem. To fix modems would require an upgrade not seen since we switched from analogue to digital broadcast television.
the web.: AWS sites still dont support ipv6. hosting providers like GoDaddy and Dreamhost have done a magnificent job of building out support but dedicated hosting solutions may still include legacy apache and nginx that dont speak 6. vendors like ironport speak ipv6 about as fluently as a slavic tourist, and in many cases proxy software and antispam actually reject ipv6 transported email as they cant handle reverse ipv6 lookups. many appliances rely entirely on hurricane or other public 6-2-4 proxes to maintain any semblance of support for the protocol. other companies like F5 networks have glorious support for ipv6, but few customers that care about it outside of cloud hosting providers.
do yourself a favour, learn it. Learn what it is and how it works, and make it a weekend project at home. youd be surprised how many people raise an eyebrow when you put 'ipv6' on your resume. For my countrymen here in the states, its coming. you cant stop it, and dual stack implementations already exist in your cellphones and public hotspots.
Good people go to bed earlier.
I just checked my IP address and it's 192.168.1.102. Whew, I'm glad I got one before they ran out. No one else can have my IP address!
No, that's just an artifact of the different policies for assigning the last addresses. RIPE (the European registry) throttled assignments by making the requirements much more strict. That change of policy was considered the point when RIPE ran out of IPv4 addresses, because the remaining addresses are not given out just for asking. Unlike the other registries, ARIN did not institute a policy to extend the availability of IPv4 addresses for transitioning purposes, so they burned through the last 16 million addresses like no tomorrow and are now truly out of IPv4 addresses to assign. They are in fact the first registry without IPv4 addresses in stock. RIPE still has almost a full /8, APNIC has two thirds of an /8, LACNIC has one seventh of an /8, and AFRINIC still has 2.3 /8 blocks.
According to google's ipv6 stats, about 21% of its American visitors access the site via ipv6.
https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=per-country-ipv6-adoption&tab=per-country-ipv6-adoption
That is not as high as Belgium (almost 36%), but it is a start.
Lots of private companies have Class A's and I just don't think Ford needs a Class A. Just like I don't think Apple needs one, nor HP needs two class A's.
This is actually a good study in human nature. A resource exhaustion (with a solution already in place) we could see from a mile off, but will do nothing about until it becomes absurdly painful to continue. Already we see monstrosities like carrier grade NAT which breaks many applications, rather than moving to IPv6 which nearly every device supports.
We'll see this same procrastinating with AGW, fossil fuels, everything else - we won't do anything about it until the economic damage is already being done and the pain level becomes extreme.
Oolite: Elite-like game. For Mac, Linux and Windows
IANA should start charging 1 $ /year / IPV4 address; next year should double the price. The year after the price should be doubled again and so on.
This should force the hoarders to let go of the addresses.
At some point , it would be to expensive to stay on IPV4 and people would migrate to IPV6.
The people who really need and can not move to IPV6 would have the option to keep IPV4 and pay.
Slashdot runs out of original headlines.
exactly as prophicised. I knew this was coming when Gene Ray went into hiding.
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
The truth is, in 2015 if you have an IPv6 only connection then you're royally f*cked.
This is not new news. It's been an issue for several years now, that only IPv6 addresses were being handed out.
Maybe no one listened last time - but this is not the first time this has been announced. http://www.theguardian.com/tec...
Why does HP still hoard 15.0.0.0/8, 16.0.0.0/8, and numerous class B's and Class C's? Someone ask Carly Fiorina, she acquired Compaq/Digital to stake her claim over the additional space for HP.
- What are we running out again? I thought we ran out last month! They are crying wolf!
- IP addresses are assigned by region we only just ran out.
- NAT makes this a non issue. Just use NAT!
- NAT is a broken concept that breaks end-to-end connectivity!
- I won't move to IPv6 they are too hard to type.
- Why are you typing IPv6?
- I can't NAT on IPv6 so it breaks my firewall and its insecure.
- NAT is not a firewall, you can firewall IPv6
- Why don't we just steal some of HP's IP addresses? They have some spare.
- Break the internet by splitting up routing tables even further.
- But NAT has protected us for many years everything works on NAT.
- Everything now needs to connect to a command server. No end-to-end connectivity and nasty workarounds in routers to make applications work.
- But DHCP doesn't work for IPv6!
- DHCP isn't needed, and if it is needed yes it does.
- But we can NAT the NATTING NAT NAT!
- Go fuck your NAT.
But you'll never take my 127.0.0.1
Back in the early days of the Internet my company purchased 4 full class C's, that's over 1000 IPv4 addresses, and that company has since come and gone, yet there they are, still showing as being owned by my old company, just sitting in wait for someone to use.
If I knew how to inform the Internet gods that they existed, I would tell them. But only if they would give me just a tiny segment (maybe 5 usable IPs) for myself?"
That tells me, if I know where there are 4 full class C segments not in use, I'd imaging there are many, many other unused IPv4 addresses not being utilized that could be put back into the pool.
If we just shut down all the porn sites on the Internet, I'm sure we'd get back a good 98% of those IP addresses...
Incipiamus, fratres, servire Domino Deo, quia hucusque vix vel parum in nullo profecimus.
I have Comcast Business as my ISP and I still only get IPv4.
use to advertise their web site on the Daily Planet by saying out their IP address, well that was in 1995.
by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
I hate technicalities, but the RIR for Latam is LACNIC. Oh, poorly chosen demonyms.
Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
There's the equivalent of over 3000 full class Cs on the waiting list for supplying by ARIN right now. (OK, there are currently no requests for a class C as any request that could be satisfied by a class C was, until yesterday, being filled from the available pool)
Recently they got given (IIRC) a /15 and two /16 which were immediately filled from the waiting list.
The problem with giving you (and anybody else) a /28 is that unless it's aggregated at the ISP, the global routing tables are going to explode (they're already pretty bad unfortunately)
So if you want that /29 then you're going to have to find someone who can use the rest of the /24 who will route that subset to you.
God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
Ah, four class Cs. That should satisfy demand for a good 2 minutes or so.
v4's problem isn't that parts of it are unused. It's that it's just too small. Returning little blocks here and there won't fix that.
When the internet started, I pushed for a 5-octet IP address.
Nobody listened.
That's okay, because IPv6 magically makes routing tables better, because magic. IPv6 is a nightmare. We just pray that the automated tools work, and use v4 for everything that needs to work. Yes, your cell phone is an v6 machine, and that's fine, because nobody gives a shit if you miss a facebook post. However, all of our towers are on a private v4 network because v6 keeps breaking things.
This makes me wonder.. The company I worked for up to 2010, was a government contractor, and prior to around 2007 or so, every user machine on the network had a routable dhcp assigned address. I recall when we changed to a NAT''ed scheme for all of the workstations. I wonder if the several Class C assignments we *had* been using were reassigned or are *still* sitting out there unused.. I'm betting the latter..
THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
I sugest that someone contacts sky broadband abuse and ask them who had 2A02:C7D:1623:F800::/56 deligated at the relevant times and if needed take legal action
This is a huge opportunity for IP address brokerage.
You mean like ? They already exist, and have for a long time.
IPv4 addresses seem to be going for about $8 to $9 at the moment, in blocks of 256 or larger. That makes a class-C allocation worth less than $2,500. So I doubt there's a crisis just yet. Not even worth the trouble of pursuing it - and the hassle of retweaking your routers and ISP relations - if you happen to have some you could part with.
But it will be interesting to watch the prices now that the US registry has announced that it is "officially out" of address. That will tell us if/when reshuffling is insufficient to hold off a real crunch but IPv6 adoption is still inadequate to mitigate the need.
It will also be interesting to see if a new digital divide develops, with some people still without IPv6 connectivity and stuff they want only available via IPv6. (Again, I doubt it will be an issue.)
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
"Nothing will change rapidly, so there is no great pressure to rush through big changes. "
I don't agree with the analogy, there's technology in place that is more versatile yet more complicated and there's the stop gap measure of forcing more and more NAT.
Oh you mean the technology that dare not speak its name (IPv6?)? I dare not speak of it.
The US built the Internet and we can take it all back with a tantrum! At any given time less than 18 million of us actually give a damn. Presently there are ~8 million unemployed persons living behind NAT firewalls, forgotten and uncounted, who could really use some help. Toss in some veterans too, especially those having trouble getting health care. Let us give them each a public IP address. Not one of those worthlessly fiat "exceeds the number of molecules in the Universe" IPv6 addresses either. They deserve something of real estimable value tied to the 'gold' IPv4 standard. But where could one obtain, say, almost 18 million IP addresses?
You do it by breaking all the rules at once, so no one can fault anyone because we're all busy being swept away by a flood. You know, like the rules and procedures for immigration you thought were there all along? And then you woke up one day and the government, all those border agents and paper-stampers were just, simply, missing? Or maybe they are hiding in New Jersey pumping gas. If you were a smart and dedicated alien who was applying for a visa and following those rules you'd feel really foolish then, to see them just come on in while you are still on a waiting list.
Just like the immigrants, it's time to make everyone on the ARIN waiting list feel foolish. It's time to open the gates.
RFC1918 is the first target. It's time to nationalize so-called 'private enterprise' address space and return it to the public, in happy glorious peoples' revolution. Let's begin to roll back the network bits for 10/8, 172.16/12 and 192.168/16 and 169.254/16 (Windows 98 rulez!) one bit at a time, one bit per hour. Starting tomorrow. Better look for the IOS password, you're going to need it! Or hell, let's just roll it all back at once. Remove those bogon filters and BGP blackholes and let it all leak out, let's have a democratic slate-wiping Internet version of thermonuclear war, and from the ashes there will rise a glorious dawn of reallocation... a new era of /32 advertisements followed by a presidential election where every candidate is an independent.
NUTS TO NAT !!!
<blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
We've had IPv6 and 100 Gbps Internet2 for years now.
Grow up and stop connecting your toaster to the Internet IPv4. Nobody wants to see pictures of your toast.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
Those big automotive waste millions of addresses as well.. Chrysler (FCA) has 3 Class B's just here in the US. Ford has several A's/B's GM has at least 6 Class B's and a bunch of Class C's Daimler also has it's own Class A. Chrysler is by far the furthest ahead in IPv6 deployment from what I have heard.
Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, and Android 2.x no longer receive security updates. This means they are likely vulnerable to "forever day" exploits that surreptitiously install malware that adds other means of exfiltrating data from a system. An attaker doesn't need to Firesheep a victim's session cookie if he can install a keylogger that captures a whole password. Heck, an attacker could just install a keylogger that captures a victim's keystrokes when entering a credit card number. So if Windows XP is insecure in this manner, why even try to offer "secure" services to an insecure client?
What's wrong with a reverse proxy handling all the HTTPS work in front of a bunch of application servers on their own VMs?
Run Forrest Run!
http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
Proven wrong yet again.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Big reason for that would be that at the time they did it, it was on equipment that used IPv4 as it was then - without NAT. NAT was only something that came later to 'address' the shortage of addresses. But at the time that these networks were set up, the protocol didn't have that, and therefore, they had to use public IP addresses for both their internal LANs as well as their outward facing boxes.
Maybe we should all be assigned a /64 from birth and have it tattooed on our arms.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Acting like you somehow won any of those arguments, then posting agreeing with yourself? Really? How pathetic are you?
You won nothing in any of those discussions, and you don't even seem to understand how very wrong you are.
What is DNSBL APK? What internet service uses it? How does it work? How will your hosts file prevent it? How will you get around your block on a DNSBL that prevents you sending mail to servers that use it?
Please inform me oh wise ass. You know everything about the internet and its functions, but you can't even understand the difference between these two things:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Please inform me of how you will get around DNSBL? Please show me how wise you are.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
...Europe ran out." I'd be more impressed if I'd heard anything about this in Europe. If people are suffering there, nobody's talking about it...
It will also be interesting to see if a new digital divide develops, with some people still without IPv6 connectivity and stuff they want only available via IPv6. (Again, I doubt it will be an issue.)
Just start a rumor that Google gives preferential page rank to IPv6, then everybody and everything will be on it!
Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
A new digital divide can only be due to IPv4 scarcity. There won't be any scarcity of IPv6 addresses to anyone anywhere. Only problem may be a place not having IPv6 supporting equipment, but that's not something that one can't shop around for
I remember something along the lines of those guys reserving like half the address space ...
So when will the cloud providers FINALLY start really supporting IPv6? My company, as many do, uses Amazon EC2, RDS, S3, etc.., and the closest Amazon gets to IPv6 is their load balancers, which can't support the domain apex unless you also use their DNS. I refuse to pay per query for their DNS, so that means I can't use their load balancers for my websites and my client's websites. So no IPv6 for me.
And as far as I can tell, Google's and Microsoft's clouds still don't support IPv6 either.. :(
. Define sqrt(x) as something really evil like (x / rand()), and bury it deep. Watch your coworkers go nuts.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
See subject & "read em' & weep" Dave420 http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
* "EATING YOUR WORDS" != GOOD NUTRITION fool!
APK
P.S.=> How'd they taste, Dave420? Flavored with the "bitter taste of SELF-defeat", & washed down with your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH ramming them down?? LMAO @ U, fool... apk
See subject: Eating your words != good nutrition you hypocrite noob http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
"So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)
Tell us another one, hypocrite - You admitted using admin priv yourself & how else could I programmatically update hosts minus it inside Windows, hmmm?
ANSWER:
I have to do it that way, to protect AND speed up users plus make their connections online more reliable!
(The latter of which also functions to make users faster than adblocking alone, by resolving host-domain names to IP address from hosts cached in RAM locally - far faster than calling out to remote DNS & less complex + less overheads ridden vs. locally installed DNS (less power, & FAR LESS if done on a separate machine)).
---
Aha! What's this Coren22 admits?
"Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)
See subject & BOTH quotes from you contradicting yourself!
(& a REAL security pro, Aryeh Goretsky of NOD32/ESET agrees hosts = good security -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ).
APK
P.S.=> LMAO - "EAT YOUR WORDS" you hypocritical STUPID little technically incompetent troll wannabe security guru, lol - you're constantly trolling me, your post history shows it - NOW, you're getting a DOSE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE (How's it taste? Better than how "eating your words" does I bet!)
... apk
Hello User: Thank you for contacting WOW! Internet, Cable , and Phone via email. My name is Sherri. I apologize for the delay in responding to your email. I apologize for the inconvenience but at this time there is no information about when we will start utilizing the IPv6 protocol. Please let us know if there is anything else that we can do to assist you. If you have an issue that requires immediate attention, WOW! Customer Service is available 24/7 for your convenience at 1-866-496-9669. Respectfully, Sherri - C6671 Advanced Support Specialist, Tier II WOW! Internet, Cable and Phone