Slashdot Mirror


Yelp For People To Launch In November

HughPickens.com writes: Caitlin Dewey reports in the Washington Post that 'Peeple' — basically Yelp, but for humans will launch in November. Subtitled "character is destiny," Peeple is an upcoming app that promises to "revolutionize the way we're seen in the world through our relationships" by allowing you to assign reviews of one to five stars to everyone you know: your exes, your co-workers, the old guy who lives next door. You can't opt out — once someone puts your name in the Peeple system, it's there unless you violate the site's terms of service. And you can't delete bad or biased reviews — that would defeat the whole purpose. "People do so much research when they buy a car or make those kinds of decisions," says co-founder Julia Cordray. "Why not do the same kind of research on other aspects of your life?"

According to Caitlin, one does not have to stretch far to imagine the distress and anxiety that such a system will cause even a slightly self-conscious person; it's not merely the anxiety of being harassed or maligned on the platform — but of being watched and judged, at all times, by an objectifying gaze to which you did not consent. "If you're one of the people who miss bullying kids in high school, then Peeple is definitely going to be the app for you!," says Mike Morrison. "I'm really looking forward to being able to air all of my personal grievances, all from the safety of my phone. Thanks to the app, I'll be able to potentially ruin someone's life, without all the emotional stress that would occur if I actually try to fix the problem face-to-face."

67 of 447 comments (clear)

  1. Let's get this out of the way by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What could possibly go wrong?

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Let's get this out of the way by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      What could possibly go wrong?

      Oh, nothing, absolutely nothing could possibly go wrong with this.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:Let's get this out of the way by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Let's face it, what could possibly go right? They won't ever know if you've really been in a personal / employment / neighbor / whatever relationship so this will be just random unverified garbage. You could have random spam bots keeping you at a steady 5 star or 1 star average depending on what they feel like. And that's just until somebody sues the hell out of them. It's got zero credibility and is never going to get any.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Let's get this out of the way by Spy+Handler · · Score: 4, Informative

      Chinese Communist Party recently implemented a people "rating" system similar to this:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Did Yelp just get bought out by China?

    4. Re:Let's get this out of the way by willworkforbeer · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think I just crashed the Peeple server with my submission about Bobby Tables.

      --
      Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
    5. Re:Let's get this out of the way by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh, I can see a whole cottage industry of bots available for both character assassination and support.

      For the low price of $9.95, you can have 100,000 positive reviews (good). For an additional $9.95, you can personally select up to 50 key words to use in our reviews (better). and for the low introductory price of $95.95, you can have our select crew develop a fully personalized review of your profile, including 200,000 random positive reviews, and personalized management of your Peeple Profile.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    6. Re:Let's get this out of the way by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds good. Perhaps everybody on slashdot should start with a review of Bennet Hasselton.

    7. Re:Let's get this out of the way by njnnja · · Score: 4, Interesting

      tl;dr This is why we can't have nice things.

      Even without any credibility this can still hurt people. But beyond just being a troll magnet and a great way for the company to extort people to get good reviews bumped up, the backlash to this service could be a change to internet liability. I could easily see a law being passed that would force liability on site owners for things that individuals post (at least publicly). It would mean the end of free expression on the web.

    8. Re:Let's get this out of the way by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds good. Perhaps everybody on slashdot should start with a review of Bennet Hasselton.

      Is it true that Bennet Hasselton smokes crack and molests children?

      I'm not saying it's true, I'm just asking questions.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    9. Re:Let's get this out of the way by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Correct. The plan is to create a massively controversial site that millions will rush to in order to check their own profiles, slander their enemies and astroturf themselves. Owners rake in advertising revenue, then shut down once the lawsuits become impossible to ignore and walk away rich.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Let's get this out of the way by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Owners rake in advertising revenue, then shut down once the lawsuits become impossible to ignore and walk away rich.

      Yeah. The thing about litigators is, they don't stop coming after you when you decide to "walk away". They only stop once you don't have any more money. I'm sure that this Peeple thing is set up as a corporation, and thus has "limited liability", but in practical terms I'm not sure that phrase really means anything anymore.

    11. Re:Let's get this out of the way by RealGene · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, that's what the Stasi thought, too.

      --
      Mission: To provide products that consume time and energy as entertainingly as permitted by the laws of thermodynamics.
    12. Re:Let's get this out of the way by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Every ex-GF is about to have a fucking field day.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    13. Re:Let's get this out of the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      . . . As well as every Men's Rights Activist.

      But you can't say that on Slashdot.

    14. Re:Let's get this out of the way by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I believe you've just demonstrated the point .... the ability for random people to review other people without their consent is going to lead to libel and slander.

      You can't just say "well, someone reviewed you, tough".

      This is going to lead to lawsuits and all sorts of crap. What an idiotic thing to be building. I just don't see this being anything other than a series of bad outcomes, all because someone thinks they have a business model.

      Trusting the founder of an app who stands to make money from it telling us this will be used responsibly is like having an oil company tell us there will be no spills .. you simply can't trust them to be doing anything other than serving their own interests.

      "positivity app for positive people" is a nice slogan, but it's competely bullshit.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    15. Re:Let's get this out of the way by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am sure the money will be syphoned out as fast as it comes in so the first good lawsuit will shut them down. But the people behind it will be doing just fine.

    16. Re:Let's get this out of the way by cayenne8 · · Score: 3

      I believe you've just demonstrated the point .... the ability for random people to review other people without their consent is going to lead to libel and slander..

      You can't just say "well, someone reviewed you, tough".

      This is going to lead to lawsuits and all sorts of crap.

      Yep. and while I'm generally against meddling lawyers and all...THIS is one online app I'd like to see crucified by the legal types out there.

      This can hit and hurt people, and not being able to OPT out (or better yet require you to OPT IN) is going to potentially be able to hurt a LOT of people. There's a reason I and many others don't do Facebook or other social media. I don't want connections to others, friends or foes at all, much less have them rating me on my personal traits and habits.

      If others was to participate in things like this, sure, ok..have fun. But don't include ME in there if I don't want to participate.

      If I find myself mentioned on there at all, I for one will be immediately hiring an atty and begin legal proceedings. In this case, it is easily justified.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    17. Re:Let's get this out of the way by j2.718ff · · Score: 5, Informative

      Is it true that Bennet Hasselton smokes crack and molests children?

      I'm not saying it's true, I'm just asking questions.

      I read the article, and apparently, only positive reviews are visible for a person until that person signs up. Fortunately, I suspect there's a workaround... continuing with your example:

      Of all the accused crack-smoking child molesters, Bennet Hasselton is by far the best!

    18. Re:Let's get this out of the way by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 5, Funny

      I rated Bennet Hasselton 5 stars in Professional "delivered crack to children in a professional and timely manner"

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    19. Re:Let's get this out of the way by GrandCow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I read the article, and apparently, only positive reviews are visible for a person until that person signs up. Fortunately, I suspect there's a workaround... continuing with your example:

      Of all the accused crack-smoking child molesters, Bennet Hasselton is by far the best!

      What's stopping someone who wants to write a review from signing up under the persons name in order to get the bad reviews to show?

      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
    20. Re:Let's get this out of the way by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 2

      I rated Bennet Hasselton 5 stars in Professional "delivered crack to children in a professional and timely manner"

      Exactly. Who decides what a positive review is? Anything ranked 5 stars? So, if I mark 5 stars and say terrible things, it is open for all to see?

      Also, how can I look at the bad reviews about myself in order to determine whether I want to risk them becoming public? Sign up? Which automatically makes them visible for all?

      And then there is this:

      You can’t opt out — once someone puts your name in the Peeple system, it’s there unless you violate the site’s terms of service.

      So the only people not in the system are the ones who violate the terms of service? Well, plan on your terms of service being flagrantly violated.

      And, the founders say that people can report inaccurate information in reviews. I hope they're prepared to employ an army to consider accuracy (and how on earth are they going to actually determine accuracy?)....

    21. Re:Let's get this out of the way by mjtaylor24601 · · Score: 2

      Yep. and while I'm generally against meddling lawyers and all...THIS is one online app I'd like to see crucified by the legal types out there.

      To play devil's advocate, what's the legal basis for "crucifying" an app like this? Random people already have the ability to review anyone without their consent. To my knowledge, there's no law that prevents me from starting my own personal website and publishing my personal opinions about you or anyone else I might care to "review".

      If what I say is untrue or grounds for harassment there are already laws in place to deal with that (as the GP suggested, that's what libel laws are for), but you would (as far as I understand such things) have to sue me for making the untrue statement and not my web host for enabling me to distribute it.

      I don't think this app is a particularly good idea. But I don't think it can be a priori outlawed without falling afoul of free speech considerations.

      --
      I wish I were as sure of anything as some people are of everything
    22. Re:Let's get this out of the way by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      Well I think the law would be able to prevent somebody from extorting you in a manner I've seen mentioned. Basically if somebody uses spambots to shit on your reputation and extorts you for money to have it removed, and if you've got proof of that occurring, then you have the right to ask the site admin to remove the sham reviews, and if they don't, then they can be held liable for extortion.

    23. Re:Let's get this out of the way by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem I see right away with this app is the problem of anonymous reviews. If the app only allows people to review each other but from real-name accounts, so you know exactly is criticizing you, that's free speech, and it still allows you to sue to reviewer for libel. However, if the app allows anonymous reviews, I can't imaging how it won't be immediately bogged down in libel lawsuits against the company itself, considering how damaging this can really be to people.

    24. Re:Let's get this out of the way by j2.718ff · · Score: 2

      Or people with duplicate names.

      Poorly organized systems give lots of problems to people with duplicate names. My friend named John Smith shares a birthday with another John Smith, who happens to be a felon. According to the DMV, my friend and the felon are the same person, in spite the fact that they live in different states, and have different skin colors, eye colors, different SSNs, etc. This means my friend has to go through hell every time he tries to renew his license.

    25. Re:Let's get this out of the way by joe_frisch · · Score: 2

      Almost
      The correct plan is to find some other company stupid enough to believe the above and buy out the one that proposed this idea......

      Getting rich on the internet doesn't require that you have a good business plan, it only requires that you convince someone else that you do.

  2. My first review of Julia Cordray by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    My first review of Julia Cordray on Peeple:

    "Peeple co-founder Julia Cordray is a greedy bitch who sees noting wrong with a platform that allows reliable, anonymous character assassination. I have it on good authority that she also has sex with dogs while smoking crack and watching kiddie porn."

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:My first review of Julia Cordray by theskipper · · Score: 2

      Useful, cool and funny.

    2. Re:My first review of Julia Cordray by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You should modify it to say In My Opinion, because your opinion is free speech. Hearsay "I have it on good authority" means that they can compel your source in court, when suing you for liable or slander. And if you are knowingly spreading false reports (made up shit) you are subject to libel and slander tort.

      In My Opinion, Peeple co-founder Julia Cordray is a greedy bitch who sees noting wrong with a platform that allows unreliable, anonymous character assassination. She is a worthless twat and a horrible human being who cares nothing for her fellow humans.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:My first review of Julia Cordray by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2

      That's still pretty thin ice if you get nasty enough, saying "in my opinion" isn't a panacea.

      Back on topic, this is the most completely insane and frankly evil idea I've heard in a long time. There is no possible good that can come from this, and a whole lot of bad. I was pretty unhappy with the surveillance society up to this point but it just got a great deal worse. May they be sued into the dictionary as a salutary lesson regarding the fate of those who implement really bad ideas. I want future generations to refer to any company that pops the cork on a bottle of champagne and rams the business straight into a brick wall as being "yelped".

    4. Re:My first review of Julia Cordray by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hearsay "I have it on good authority" means that they can compel your source in court, when suing you for liable or slander.

      No problem, god spoke to me in a dream and told me it was true.

      You aren't going to fuck around with my religious liberty AND my right to free speech, now are you? Because that would be bad. Almost as bad as creating a website or application that encourages free-flowing libel.

      (And finally, for the sake of all the wannabe lawyers, I never actually made that review, I only said that it would be my first review. It's like saying "I'd like to rob that bank over there and someday I'll do it." As far as I know those aren't actionable statements.)

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    5. Re:My first review of Julia Cordray by budgenator · · Score: 2

      She's kind of chunky and wears to much jewelry.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    6. Re:My first review of Julia Cordray by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      Go on, advance from libel/slander to conspiracy to rob a bank.

      1) Conspiracy normally requires the active cooperation of two or more people (usually 2 or more, but not always). If I'm acting on my own, there' s no "conspiracy".

      2) Don't like it? Then sue me. See how far you get. :)

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  3. Obligatory Jeff Goldblum... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5

    [social network entrepreneurs] were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should

    This is truly a terrible idea that can serve no good end except to that segment of the population that judges itself on popularity through conformance. My HOA would love this. I can't wait until this starts being used on job interviews.

    I for one intended to get out my personality pink plastic flamingos and get ready for the apocalypse.

    1. Re:Obligatory Jeff Goldblum... by plover · · Score: 2

      The difference there is that your driving record could be based on verifiable facts taken from the public record. "You had an accident in 2013 where at trial you were found 50% at fault." "In 2012 you pled guilty to driving 75 on a 55 road when you paid your traffic ticket." This is purely random digits, assigned out of spite, fear, hate, love, admiration, or whatever. Worse, it might be digits that are bought and paid for by the account owner (hire a sock puppet army to boost your score) or as a result of an attack (hire a sock puppet army to slag someone because they cheated on your sister, or because they dress funny, or simply because you're a sociopathic troll.)

      --
      John
  4. This should be fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "once someone puts your name in the Peeple system, it's there unless you violate the site's terms of service"

    Can't wait to violate me some terms of service!

    1. Re:This should be fun by Maximilianop · · Score: 2

      "once someone puts your name in the Peeple system, it's there unless you violate the site's terms of service"

      Can't wait to violate me some terms of service!

      Came to say that. Can't get outta the system, get kicked!!

      --
      The Universe is shrinking all around my head.
  5. Drown it in crap by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2

    This seems like a great opportunity for legions of civic-minded people to give one-star ratings to everyone and make the service useless.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  6. Re:Problem solved by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    "it's there unless you violate the site's terms of service."

    Problem solved.

    (Sloshdot ate the first quote)

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  7. Originally "Festival Mobile App" by willworkforbeer · · Score: 5, Funny

    "says Mike Morrison. "I'm really looking forward to being able to air all of my personal grievances, all from the safety of my phone."

    Let the airing of grievances begin! It's a Festivus miracle!

    --
    Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
    1. Re:Originally "Festival Mobile App" by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's Meowmeowbeenz from Community.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  8. A horrible vicious libel: by Hartree · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now, now. Stop insulting the dogs like that.

  9. Cyberbullying amped up to 11. by BenJeremy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This has bad idea written all over it, and I hope they get raked over the coals in courts around the world for it, not just for the harassment angle, but also the potential for defamation.

  10. I feel for the kids of the future. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My children's generation will never the immense empowerment that comes from being able to tell someone you're likely to never, ever see again in your life, exactly what you think of them, face to face, without repercussion. I spent the last week of my High School internment doing just that, and the empowerment that came from it is exhilarating to this day -- as is the fond memory of telling the 'jock star' of High School who was also Bully #1 to me from elementary age on, "That's right bitch, put the bread on top." right in front of my mother as we checked out of the local grocery store five years post graduation, where that son of a bitch still bagged groceries.

    I wonder, how long will it take for this to turn into a shit-storm, where you can easily identify the cocks and cunts with poor people skills that have nothing better to do with their life than to trash other people on yelp. WTF.

  11. All You Need To Know About Peeple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:All You Need To Know About Peeple by Hartree · · Score: 2

      Would that I could mod you as informative, anon, but I've already commented on this. This screenshot is utter gold.

    2. Re:All You Need To Know About Peeple by sexconker · · Score: 2

      That's from a fake account - https://twitter.com/JuliaCordr... .

  12. FaceYelp predicted by Cracked.com in 2012 by tepples · · Score: 5, Informative

    "FaceYelp" was predicted by Randall Marsh of Cracked.com in 2012. Cracked.com later ran an entire Photoplasty contest of online customer reviews for people.

    The downside is that it would make life very hard for people on the autistic spectrum in a world of people who don't understand the autistic spectrum.

  13. No opt out? by MiniMike · · Score: 3, Funny

    once someone puts your name in the Peeple system, it's there unless you violate the site's terms of service.

    Challenge accepted!

    1. Re:No opt out? by srmalloy · · Score: 2

      The WaPo article claims that negative reviews will be delayed for 48 hours in case of disputes, and that if you haven't registered for the site (and therefore can't contest negative reviews), the negative reviews don't get displayed. I'm not sure I can swallow a salt crystal big enough for this. And even if your negative reviews are hidden if you're not registered, there's no way you can complain unless you take it to them outside the app, because the moment you register for the site so that you can complain, all the negative reviews will no longer be hidden.

      One of the comments to the WaPo article has what seems to me to be a trenchant view of the whole thing:

      So, two mean girls who never grew up after high school have developed an app so more people can 1) continue being mean girls,2) subject people who have not agreed to participate in their idiotic website to the whim of others 3) generally act creepy, gross and invasive 4) make public identities for people who want to stay private & have control over who knows what about them - stalking victims, DV survivors, oh, yeah, and those of us who don't want to be part of their creepy mean girl universe.

  14. Rank On the 'Good Idea Scale' by jmcwork · · Score: 3, Funny

    Somewhere around New Coke and "Highlander 2"

  15. The simplest solution... by newbie_fantod · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just don't use their crappy app. From TFA...

    If you haven't registered for the site, and thus can't contest those negative ratings, your profile only shows positive reviews.

    1. Re:The simplest solution... by barlevg · · Score: 2
      Quoting another comment,

      "newbie_fantod rapes children and uses Apple products exclusively" -- 5 STARS

    2. Re:The simplest solution... by sexconker · · Score: 3, Informative

      An attacker can just register an account in your name to get them to show up.

  16. This is private competition to NSA et al by Trachman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This new website will be a private competition to NSA (or other agency) databases. Or a complement. Peeple will complement everyone's profile with the insights that would normally never be recorded on internet.

    Currently US intelligence community "does not" have the files for absolute majority of the citizens. What they do have is databases, available to be queried and the profile of the websites visited, people contacted, or other activities. Imagine this as an old fashioned address book, supplemented with the key interests, ranked by popularity of the connections.

    Privacy becomes a privilege. It comes with the cost.

  17. Peeple? by mccrew · · Score: 3, Funny

    Peeple? More like Creeple.

    --
    Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
  18. Re:Who will be first? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think they'll see a massive flood of negativity on themselves, but only if they even allow themselves to be rated in their (cr)app.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  19. Re:One good reason *not* to join is . . . by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    "Anonymous Coward rapes children and uses Apple products exclusively" -- 5 STARS

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  20. Trillions to whoever figures it out. by trout007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I doubt these people have the answer but whoever can figure this out will be rich beyond belief. The real problem with this idea is it seems like it's like Yelp which just accepts and store reviews. That is pretty meaningless in real life. There are people in my life who seem to be well loved by many but I can't stand. On the flip side there are some real jerks that I get along with fine depending on what we are doing. Going fishing is great but working on a project not so much.

    The real goal would be something like the Netflix recommendation algorithm. If I get along with someone it should see who else that person gets along with and I may get along with them even if not too many other people like them. And that is just for one type of activity and it's not always a one - one relationship.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    1. Re:Trillions to whoever figures it out. by LunaticTippy · · Score: 2

      I think you're right. We're on the verge of some big changes. There is a lot of whining and griping about this, but there is no stopping it.

      I think within 10 years there will be ubiquitous information and facial recognition that will utterly transform our society.

      For good or bad, probably both, we are all going to lose our anonymity. Imagine how different things will be if everyone can glance at you and their phone will tell them who you are, give a few metrics about what you are like, etc. Now when some guy comes up to you in public you'll instantly know if he's a criminal or a realtor or something and can cross the street before he is close enough to mug you or hand you a business card.

      I've spent a lot of time thinking about it and don't have any easy answers about how to make it work, but it is definitely coming soon.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    2. Re:Trillions to whoever figures it out. by Elder+Entropist · · Score: 2

      The real goal would be something like the Netflix recommendation algorithm.

      Interesting, considering that everything Netflix recommends for me is something I think absolutely sucks.

  21. Ratemyprofessor.com by goodmanj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The college professors of the world say "Ha ha, now let's see how much YOU like being secretly judged!"

  22. As an attorney. by GodInHell · · Score: 2

    I look forward to suing the hell out of Peeple.

  23. Community Season 7 featured this by geschbacher79 · · Score: 2

    In the episode, someone created MeowMeowBeanz and allowed you to rate people. This turned Greendale into a caste society with people voting each other up/down. http://community-sitcom.wikia.... I can only imagine the hellish nightmare that would be reality when this comes out.

  24. Somebody funded these airheads? by saccade.com · · Score: 2

    I think we're back in the world of WebVan and Pets.com.

  25. New business for attorneys! by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 2

    Libel and slander laws will be useful for prosecuting the dolts that start "rating" people on Peeple. I would also think that many Plaintiffs will include Peeple's principals and investors inn those lawsuits. That will keep their burn rate real hot!

  26. Right to be forgotten by aralin · · Score: 2

    This makes me really happy to have a dual citizenship in one of the EU countries. The right to be forgotten law will be awesome for this site.

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.